about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,107 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Eleanor and the second variable is Biomass power generated in Thailand.  The chart goes from 1995 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of baby Eleanors grew, so did the demand for alternative energy sources, leading to a surge in the Thai biomass power sector. After all, it's no coincidence that Eleanor sounds like a renewable energy superhero!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling street in Thailand, with vibrant biomass power mills lining the sidewalks. Plumes of steam rise from the chimneys, adding to the dynamic energy of the scene. In the foreground, a group of children run through the street, their laughter echoing alongside the hum of the power plants. The surroundings are fused with the essence of cyber folk, capturing the intersection of tradition and technology in a vibrant and playful manner. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Eleanor and Biomass power generated in Thailand. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A scene from Skyrim 3D Pixar Style Cyber folk Psychedelic Cyber folk
ChatGPT: Cyber folk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Eleanor and Biomass power generated in Thailand together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A bustling street in Thailand is lined with vibrant biomass power mills, with plumes of steam rising from their chimneys. Among the crowds, a group of children playfully call out the name "Eleanor" as they run through the street, their laughter mixing with the hum of the power plants in the background.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyber folk ] and depicting this scene: A bustling street in Thailand is lined with vibrant biomass power mills, with plumes of steam rising from their chimneys. Among the crowds, a group of children playfully call out the name "Eleanor" as they run through the street, their laughter mixing with the hum of the power plants in the background. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a bustling street in Thailand, with vibrant biomass power mills lining the sidewalks. Plumes of steam rise from the chimneys, adding to the dynamic energy of the scene. In the foreground, a group of children run through the street, their laughter echoing alongside the hum of the power plants. The surroundings are fused with the essence of cyber folk, capturing the intersection of tradition and technology in a vibrant and playful manner.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Eleanor caused Biomass power generated in Thailand to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Electrical Eleanors: A Shocking Correlation Between the Name Eleanor's Popularity and Biomass Power Generation in Thailand

Journal of Puns and Power Generation

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Eleanor and Biomass power generated in Thailand. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9784686 and p < 0.01 for 1995 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Electrical Eleanors: A Shocking Correlation Between the Name Eleanor's Popularity and Biomass Power Generation in Thailand"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the surprising relationship between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and the generation of biomass power in Thailand. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a thorough analysis from 1995 to 2021. The results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9784686 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association between the two variables. In addition to shedding light on this quirky phenomenon, we aim to spark further investigation into the seemingly electrifying influence of names on renewable energy trends.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Eleanor and Biomass power generated in Thailand. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Electrical Eleanors: A Shocking Correlation Between the Name Eleanor's Popularity and Biomass Power Generation in Thailand"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the surprising relationship between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and the generation of biomass power in Thailand. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a thorough analysis from 1995 to 2021. The results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9784686 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association between the two variables. In addition to shedding light on this quirky phenomenon, we aim to spark further investigation into the seemingly electrifying influence of names on renewable energy trends.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The concept of names having an influence on various aspects of life has been a topic of fascination for centuries. From career choices to social interactions, the names we are given at birth seem to carry an unseen force that shapes our destinies. However, few could have predicted that the popularity of a particular name, such as Eleanor, could hold any sway over the generation of biomass power in a country like Thailand.

In recent years, the energy industry has been abuzz with the potential of renewable resources, and biomass power has emerged as a key player in the quest for sustainable energy sources. Meanwhile, the name Eleanor, with its classic charm and timeless appeal, has quietly maintained a presence, unassuming but persistent, in the social landscape.

The notion that these seemingly disparate elements could be intertwined might initially elicit skepticism or even a raised eyebrow. It is in this spirit of curiosity and a touch of lightheartedness that we venture forth to explore the unexpected and, dare we say, electrifying connection between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and the production of biomass power in the kingdom of Thailand.

As we embark on this journey of discovery, we do so with a sense of wonder and a hint of whimsy, recognizing that scholarly pursuit can coexist with a lighthearted appreciation of life's quirks and curiosities. After all, who would have thought that a name and a form of renewable energy could share a secret bond, waiting to be unveiled and celebrated in the realm of academia?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Eleanor and Biomass power generated in Thailand. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Electrical Eleanors: A Shocking Correlation Between the Name Eleanor's Popularity and Biomass Power Generation in Thailand"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the surprising relationship between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and the generation of biomass power in Thailand. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a thorough analysis from 1995 to 2021. The results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9784686 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association between the two variables. In addition to shedding light on this quirky phenomenon, we aim to spark further investigation into the seemingly electrifying influence of names on renewable energy trends.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The concept of names having an influence on various aspects of life has been a topic of fascination for centuries. From career choices to social interactions, the names we are given at birth seem to carry an unseen force that shapes our destinies. However, few could have predicted that the popularity of a particular name, such as Eleanor, could hold any sway over the generation of biomass power in a country like Thailand.
In recent years, the energy industry has been abuzz with the potential of renewable resources, and biomass power has emerged as a key player in the quest for sustainable energy sources. Meanwhile, the name Eleanor, with its classic charm and timeless appeal, has quietly maintained a presence, unassuming but persistent, in the social landscape.
The notion that these seemingly disparate elements could be intertwined might initially elicit skepticism or even a raised eyebrow. It is in this spirit of curiosity and a touch of lightheartedness that we venture forth to explore the unexpected and, dare we say, electrifying connection between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and the production of biomass power in the kingdom of Thailand.
As we embark on this journey of discovery, we do so with a sense of wonder and a hint of whimsy, recognizing that scholarly pursuit can coexist with a lighthearted appreciation of life's quirks and curiosities. After all, who would have thought that a name and a form of renewable energy could share a secret bond, waiting to be unveiled and celebrated in the realm of academia?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Numerous studies have delved into the fascinating realm of human names and their potential impacts on various facets of life. Smith et al. (2010) investigated the influence of names on career success, while Doe and Jones (2015) explored the connection between names and social dynamics. However, it was the work of Brown and Miller (2018) that hinted at the peculiar possibility of a name's popularity influencing environmental trends.

Furthermore, a comprehensive review of relevant non-fiction literature reveals a myriad of sources that hint at the potential interconnectedness of names and environmental phenomena. In "The Power of Names" by White (2012), the author discusses the subtle yet profound influence of names on societal structures. Additionally, "Renewable Energy and You: A Practical Guide" by Green (2016) provides insights into the factors that drive the adoption of sustainable energy solutions.

Moving beyond the realm of non-fiction, one encounters a curious assortment of fictional works that, at first glance, appear unrelated to our investigation. However, a closer examination unveils the underlying parallels. For instance, in "Eleanor's Renewable Realm" by Blue (2005), a captivating tale unfolds, hinting at the potential synergy between a name and the vitality of nature. Likewise, the dystopian novel "Biomass Babes" by Red (2010) presents a speculative narrative that inadvertently touches upon the symbiotic relationship between human nomenclature and environmental developments.

In a departure from conventional scholarly sources, it is worth noting that the authors of this research paper employed an unconventional approach to literature review by examining an array of varied materials, including but not limited to, whimsical children's stories, cryptic fortune cookie messages, and anecdotes from eccentric individuals. Furthermore, the authors took noteworthy inspiration from perusing supermarket tabloids, fortuitous encounters with talking parrots, and even the cryptic messages hidden within CVS receipts – all of which yielded no discernible insights but did provoke many a hearty chuckle and raised eyebrow.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Eleanor and Biomass power generated in Thailand. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1995 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Electrical Eleanors: A Shocking Correlation Between the Name Eleanor's Popularity and Biomass Power Generation in Thailand"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the surprising relationship between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and the generation of biomass power in Thailand. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a thorough analysis from 1995 to 2021. The results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9784686 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association between the two variables. In addition to shedding light on this quirky phenomenon, we aim to spark further investigation into the seemingly electrifying influence of names on renewable energy trends.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The concept of names having an influence on various aspects of life has been a topic of fascination for centuries. From career choices to social interactions, the names we are given at birth seem to carry an unseen force that shapes our destinies. However, few could have predicted that the popularity of a particular name, such as Eleanor, could hold any sway over the generation of biomass power in a country like Thailand.
In recent years, the energy industry has been abuzz with the potential of renewable resources, and biomass power has emerged as a key player in the quest for sustainable energy sources. Meanwhile, the name Eleanor, with its classic charm and timeless appeal, has quietly maintained a presence, unassuming but persistent, in the social landscape.
The notion that these seemingly disparate elements could be intertwined might initially elicit skepticism or even a raised eyebrow. It is in this spirit of curiosity and a touch of lightheartedness that we venture forth to explore the unexpected and, dare we say, electrifying connection between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and the production of biomass power in the kingdom of Thailand.
As we embark on this journey of discovery, we do so with a sense of wonder and a hint of whimsy, recognizing that scholarly pursuit can coexist with a lighthearted appreciation of life's quirks and curiosities. After all, who would have thought that a name and a form of renewable energy could share a secret bond, waiting to be unveiled and celebrated in the realm of academia?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the perplexing link between the popularity of the name Eleanor and biomass power generation in Thailand, a rigorous and, dare we say, electrifying approach was employed. The primary data sources for this study were the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, which provided comprehensive datasets spanning the period from 1995 to 2021.

Upon harnessing the power of the internet, our research team embarked on an odyssey of data collection, scouring vast digital archives and venturing into the depths of online repositories. The quest for the popularity of the name Eleanor led us through the annals of social security records, where the ebb and flow of this illustrious appellation was meticulously charted. Meanwhile, the pursuit of biomass power generation statistics in Thailand took us on a journey through the digital jungle of energy databases, navigating the twists and turns of kilowatts and renewable energy potentials.

Having wrangled these disparate datasets into submission, the next step involved a series of curious computations and enigmatic analyses. The statistical relationship between the popularity of the name Eleanor and biomass power generation in Thailand was unveiled through the mystical arts of correlation coefficients and hypothesis tests. The wily tools of regression analysis were also summoned to disentangle the intricate web of variables, shedding light on the seemingly shocking connection between these otherwise unrelated phenomena.

In the spirit of scholarly inquiry and a dash of whimsy, the data were subjected to rigorous scrutiny to ensure the robustness of the findings. Sensitivity analyses were performed, teasing out the threads of uncertainty and scrutinizing the resilience of the statistical associations. Through these esoteric exercises, the compelling link between the name Eleanor and biomass power generation in Thailand emerged, sparking a frisson of excitement and a hint of disbelief.

As we unravel this peculiar entanglement, it is essential to acknowledge the limitations of our study. While the data sources underpinning this investigation are substantial, they are not immune to the quirks and idiosyncrasies that often permeate large-scale datasets. Furthermore, the generalization of our findings beyond the confines of Thailand and the specific time frame warrants caution, urging future scholars to tread carefully as they venture into this uncharted territory of name-based influences on renewable energy dynamics.

In the pursuit of scientific inquiry, it is crucial to maintain a balance between solemnity and mirth, recognizing that scholarly endeavors can, indeed, accommodate a touch of levity. With this in mind, the methodologies employed in this study sought to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the name Eleanor and the generation of biomass power in Thailand, infusing the pursuit of knowledge with a measure of curiosity and, perhaps, a whisper of enchantment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Eleanor and Biomass power generated in Thailand. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1995 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9784686, r-squared of 0.9574007, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Electrical Eleanors: A Shocking Correlation Between the Name Eleanor's Popularity and Biomass Power Generation in Thailand"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the surprising relationship between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and the generation of biomass power in Thailand. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a thorough analysis from 1995 to 2021. The results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9784686 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association between the two variables. In addition to shedding light on this quirky phenomenon, we aim to spark further investigation into the seemingly electrifying influence of names on renewable energy trends.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The concept of names having an influence on various aspects of life has been a topic of fascination for centuries. From career choices to social interactions, the names we are given at birth seem to carry an unseen force that shapes our destinies. However, few could have predicted that the popularity of a particular name, such as Eleanor, could hold any sway over the generation of biomass power in a country like Thailand.
In recent years, the energy industry has been abuzz with the potential of renewable resources, and biomass power has emerged as a key player in the quest for sustainable energy sources. Meanwhile, the name Eleanor, with its classic charm and timeless appeal, has quietly maintained a presence, unassuming but persistent, in the social landscape.
The notion that these seemingly disparate elements could be intertwined might initially elicit skepticism or even a raised eyebrow. It is in this spirit of curiosity and a touch of lightheartedness that we venture forth to explore the unexpected and, dare we say, electrifying connection between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and the production of biomass power in the kingdom of Thailand.
As we embark on this journey of discovery, we do so with a sense of wonder and a hint of whimsy, recognizing that scholarly pursuit can coexist with a lighthearted appreciation of life's quirks and curiosities. After all, who would have thought that a name and a form of renewable energy could share a secret bond, waiting to be unveiled and celebrated in the realm of academia?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data gathered from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration yielded some truly hair-raising findings. We found a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9784686 between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and biomass power generation in Thailand. The r-squared value of 0.9574007 further reinforced the robustness of this relationship. This connection was confirmed to be statistically significant, with a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving no room for doubt about the shocking nature of our discovery.

Figure 1 illustrates this stunning correlation with a scatterplot that visually conveys the tight relationship between the two variables. The strong positive association between the popularity of the name Eleanor and the generation of biomass power in Thailand is as clear as day, illuminating a previously unnoticed link that sparks excitement in the world of academia.

The implications of these findings are absolutely electrifying, as they open the door to a new realm of investigation into the mysterious ways in which names and energy trends may be entwined. This unexpected connection challenges conventional wisdom and energizes further exploration into the unseen forces that shape our world, reminding us that even in the realm of scholarly pursuit, there is room for a spark of whimsy and a jolt of surprise.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Eleanor and Biomass power generated in Thailand. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Electrical Eleanors: A Shocking Correlation Between the Name Eleanor's Popularity and Biomass Power Generation in Thailand"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the surprising relationship between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and the generation of biomass power in Thailand. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a thorough analysis from 1995 to 2021. The results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9784686 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association between the two variables. In addition to shedding light on this quirky phenomenon, we aim to spark further investigation into the seemingly electrifying influence of names on renewable energy trends.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous studies have delved into the fascinating realm of human names and their potential impacts on various facets of life. Smith et al. (2010) investigated the influence of names on career success, while Doe and Jones (2015) explored the connection between names and social dynamics. However, it was the work of Brown and Miller (2018) that hinted at the peculiar possibility of a name's popularity influencing environmental trends.
Furthermore, a comprehensive review of relevant non-fiction literature reveals a myriad of sources that hint at the potential interconnectedness of names and environmental phenomena. In "The Power of Names" by White (2012), the author discusses the subtle yet profound influence of names on societal structures. Additionally, "Renewable Energy and You: A Practical Guide" by Green (2016) provides insights into the factors that drive the adoption of sustainable energy solutions.
Moving beyond the realm of non-fiction, one encounters a curious assortment of fictional works that, at first glance, appear unrelated to our investigation. However, a closer examination unveils the underlying parallels. For instance, in "Eleanor's Renewable Realm" by Blue (2005), a captivating tale unfolds, hinting at the potential synergy between a name and the vitality of nature. Likewise, the dystopian novel "Biomass Babes" by Red (2010) presents a speculative narrative that inadvertently touches upon the symbiotic relationship between human nomenclature and environmental developments.
In a departure from conventional scholarly sources, it is worth noting that the authors of this research paper employed an unconventional approach to literature review by examining an array of varied materials, including but not limited to, whimsical children's stories, cryptic fortune cookie messages, and anecdotes from eccentric individuals. Furthermore, the authors took noteworthy inspiration from perusing supermarket tabloids, fortuitous encounters with talking parrots, and even the cryptic messages hidden within CVS receipts – all of which yielded no discernible insights but did provoke many a hearty chuckle and raised eyebrow.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data gathered from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration yielded some truly hair-raising findings. We found a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9784686 between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and biomass power generation in Thailand. The r-squared value of 0.9574007 further reinforced the robustness of this relationship. This connection was confirmed to be statistically significant, with a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving no room for doubt about the shocking nature of our discovery.
Figure 1 illustrates this stunning correlation with a scatterplot that visually conveys the tight relationship between the two variables. The strong positive association between the popularity of the name Eleanor and the generation of biomass power in Thailand is as clear as day, illuminating a previously unnoticed link that sparks excitement in the world of academia.
The implications of these findings are absolutely electrifying, as they open the door to a new realm of investigation into the mysterious ways in which names and energy trends may be entwined. This unexpected connection challenges conventional wisdom and energizes further exploration into the unseen forces that shape our world, reminding us that even in the realm of scholarly pursuit, there is room for a spark of whimsy and a jolt of surprise.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The electrifying findings of our study have sparked a lively discussion in the academic community. Our results align with prior research by Brown and Miller (2018), who hinted at the possibility of names influencing environmental trends. The shockingly high correlation coefficient we uncovered further supports the notion that names may indeed hold an unexpected sway over energy-related phenomena. The statistical significance of our findings, with a p-value of less than 0.01, zaps away any doubts about the legitimacy of this connection.

Reflecting on the whimsical literature review, it is striking to note the seemingly far-fetched nature of the sources that initially inspired our investigation. Despite their quirky origins, there is a certain resonance with our findings, illustrating the unpredictable and surprising ways in which scholarly pursuits can unfold. The synergy between "Eleanor's Renewable Realm" by Blue (2005) and our results is both amusing and thought-provoking, underscoring the intricate relationship between human nomenclature and environmental dynamics.

Our analysis not only confirms the correlation between the popularity of the name Eleanor and biomass power generation in Thailand but also sheds light on the hitherto overlooked influence of names on renewable energy trends. The implications of this connection are indeed electrifying, breathing new life into the exploration of unconventional factors that shape our world. As researchers, we must remain open to the unexpected and be willing to embrace the whimsy that can arise from even the most unusual studies, for it is in these moments of surprise that we may stumble upon the most illuminating discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Eleanor and Biomass power generated in Thailand. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Electrical Eleanors: A Shocking Correlation Between the Name Eleanor's Popularity and Biomass Power Generation in Thailand"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the surprising relationship between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and the generation of biomass power in Thailand. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a thorough analysis from 1995 to 2021. The results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9784686 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association between the two variables. In addition to shedding light on this quirky phenomenon, we aim to spark further investigation into the seemingly electrifying influence of names on renewable energy trends.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The concept of names having an influence on various aspects of life has been a topic of fascination for centuries. From career choices to social interactions, the names we are given at birth seem to carry an unseen force that shapes our destinies. However, few could have predicted that the popularity of a particular name, such as Eleanor, could hold any sway over the generation of biomass power in a country like Thailand.
In recent years, the energy industry has been abuzz with the potential of renewable resources, and biomass power has emerged as a key player in the quest for sustainable energy sources. Meanwhile, the name Eleanor, with its classic charm and timeless appeal, has quietly maintained a presence, unassuming but persistent, in the social landscape.
The notion that these seemingly disparate elements could be intertwined might initially elicit skepticism or even a raised eyebrow. It is in this spirit of curiosity and a touch of lightheartedness that we venture forth to explore the unexpected and, dare we say, electrifying connection between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and the production of biomass power in the kingdom of Thailand.
As we embark on this journey of discovery, we do so with a sense of wonder and a hint of whimsy, recognizing that scholarly pursuit can coexist with a lighthearted appreciation of life's quirks and curiosities. After all, who would have thought that a name and a form of renewable energy could share a secret bond, waiting to be unveiled and celebrated in the realm of academia?

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data gathered from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration yielded some truly hair-raising findings. We found a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9784686 between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and biomass power generation in Thailand. The r-squared value of 0.9574007 further reinforced the robustness of this relationship. This connection was confirmed to be statistically significant, with a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving no room for doubt about the shocking nature of our discovery.
Figure 1 illustrates this stunning correlation with a scatterplot that visually conveys the tight relationship between the two variables. The strong positive association between the popularity of the name Eleanor and the generation of biomass power in Thailand is as clear as day, illuminating a previously unnoticed link that sparks excitement in the world of academia.
The implications of these findings are absolutely electrifying, as they open the door to a new realm of investigation into the mysterious ways in which names and energy trends may be entwined. This unexpected connection challenges conventional wisdom and energizes further exploration into the unseen forces that shape our world, reminding us that even in the realm of scholarly pursuit, there is room for a spark of whimsy and a jolt of surprise.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has shed light on the shockingly strong correlation between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and biomass power generation in Thailand, leaving us positively charged with excitement and curiosity. This unexpected relationship has certainly sparked an electrifying buzz in the academic community, sparking thoughts of potential "power names" and "watt a coincidence" jokes.

The implications of our findings are truly electrifying, as they suggest a potential avenue for renewable energy awareness campaigns targeting expectant parents. Imagine baby showers featuring biomass-themed decorations and onesies with slogans like "Eleanor: Generating Renewable Energy Since 1920!"

Furthermore, our research underscores the need for a paradigm shift in the way we view the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. Perhaps the universe has a sense of humor, as it seemingly nudges parents towards naming their children in ways that unknowingly influence the energy landscape of a country halfway across the world.

In the spirit of scientific inquiry, we suggest that no further research is needed in this area, as the results of our study have left us feeling positively charged and fully "amp"le in our understanding of the radiant connection between nomenclature and renewable energy. After all, isn't it "shocking" enough that the name Eleanor could have such a "powerful" impact on biomass energy generation in Thailand?

This concludes our study, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the quirks of life, the mysteries of the cosmos, and the electrifying nature of interdisciplinary research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Electrical Eleanors: A Shocking Correlation Between the Name Eleanor's Popularity and Biomass Power Generation in Thailand. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Puns and Power Generation


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Electrical Eleanors: A Shocking Correlation Between the Name Eleanor's Popularity and Biomass Power Generation in Thailand. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Quirky Research and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Electrical Eleanors: A Shocking Correlation Between the Name Eleanor's Popularity and Biomass Power Generation in Thailand with an abstract of This study examines the surprising relationship between the popularity of the first name Eleanor and the generation of biomass power in Thailand. Utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, we conducted a thorough analysis from 1995 to 2021. The results revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9784686 and p < 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association between the two variables. In addition to shedding light on this quirky phenomenon, we aim to spark further investigation into the seemingly electrifying influence of names on renewable energy trends.

ChatGPT:

"popularity of the name Eleanor", "biomass power generation Thailand", "US Social Security Administration data", "Energy Information Administration data", "correlation coefficient analysis", "renewable energy trends", "influence of names on energy generation"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Eleanor
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Eleanor
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Eleanor

Biomass power generated in Thailand
Detailed data title: Total biomass power generated in Thailand in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Biomass power generated in Thailand

Correlation r = 0.9784686 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9574007 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Biomass power generated in Thailand) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Eleanor) over the 27 years from 1995 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.2E-18. 0.0000000000000000011882099517
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 1.2E-16% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 841,602,107,918,113,664 random variables You don't actually need 841 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 26 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 26 because we have two variables measured over a period of 27 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.95, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Eleanor (Babies born)4374875377196887718269611007106312371221127113421491185120832381301137394438513855475732620063757093
Biomass power generated in Thailand (Billion kWh)0.2880.860.3430.3190.8660.5090.4920.6861.1511.281.531.4691.7962.6063.0713.3854.2864.4016.6977.1597.43617.98915.386316.334218.484116.616119.7916




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([437,487,537,719,688,771,826,961,1007,1063,1237,1221,1271,1342,1491,1851,2083,2381,3011,3739,4438,5138,5547,5732,6200,6375,7093,])
array_2 = np.array([0.288,0.86,0.343,0.319,0.866,0.509,0.492,0.686,1.151,1.28,1.53,1.469,1.796,2.606,3.071,3.385,4.286,4.401,6.697,7.159,7.436,17.989,15.3863,16.3342,18.4841,16.6161,19.7916,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Eleanor"
array_2_name = "Biomass power generated in Thailand"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 2107 · Black Variable ID: 2905 · Red Variable ID: 24033
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0