Report an error
Popularity of the first name Eleanor correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Wind power generated in Poland | r=0.99 | 27yrs | Yes! |
Total wind power generated globally | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
The number of compliance officers in Utah | r=0.99 | 13yrs | No |
Wind power generated in United Kingdom | r=0.99 | 34yrs | Yes! |
Biomass power generated in Thailand | r=0.98 | 27yrs | Yes! |
The number of industrial machinery mechanics in Michigan | r=0.98 | 20yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Eleanor also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)