about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,047 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and the second variable is Electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The genetically modified corn stalks in Indiana have developed a natural ability to conduct electricity, creating a new source of power. As the corn fields become electrified, Saint Kitts and Nevis are unknowingly receiving a boost in electricity generation, turning the Midwest into the shocking new hub of renewable energy. It's a-maize-ing how the corn industry is really sparking change in the Caribbean power scene!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a TIME magazine cover featuring a striking scene where a vast and lush cornfield in Indiana stretches into the distance. The tall green stalks of genetically modified corn sway gently in the breeze, creating a mesmerizing and peaceful atmosphere. In the background, a modern wind turbine stands tall and graceful, blending seamlessly into the landscape as it generates electricity for the island of Saint Kitts and Nevis. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art Hyper-realistic A TIME magazine cover image Cutsy graphics Woodblock painting
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast cornfield in Indiana, tall green stalks of genetically modified corn sway gently in the breeze. In the background, a modern wind turbine stands tall, generating electricity for the island of Saint Kitts and Nevis.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a vast cornfield in Indiana, tall green stalks of genetically modified corn sway gently in the breeze. In the background, a modern wind turbine stands tall, generating electricity for the island of Saint Kitts and Nevis. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a TIME magazine cover featuring a striking scene where a vast and lush cornfield in Indiana stretches into the distance. The tall green stalks of genetically modified corn sway gently in the breeze, creating a mesmerizing and peaceful atmosphere. In the background, a modern wind turbine stands tall and graceful, blending seamlessly into the landscape as it generates electricity for the island of Saint Kitts and Nevis.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Indiana caused Electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Shocking Connection: The Kernel-Currant Nexus Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and Electricity Generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis

The Journal of Agronomic Amperage

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9825280 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connection: The Kernel-Currant Nexus Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and Electricity Generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The elusive relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) use in corn grown in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis has been a source of corn-fusion for researchers and pun enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into this electrifying link, utilizing data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration to spark our analysis. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9825280 and p < 0.01 for the time frame spanning 2003 to 2021. Through this cornucopia of data, we hope to shed light on this dynamic relationship and plant the seeds for further inquiry into the shocking synergy between agricultural practices and power generation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connection: The Kernel-Currant Nexus Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and Electricity Generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The elusive relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) use in corn grown in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis has been a source of corn-fusion for researchers and pun enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into this electrifying link, utilizing data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration to spark our analysis. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9825280 and p < 0.01 for the time frame spanning 2003 to 2021. Through this cornucopia of data, we hope to shed light on this dynamic relationship and plant the seeds for further inquiry into the shocking synergy between agricultural practices and power generation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The interconnectedness of ecological systems never ceases to amaze researchers and laymen alike. One might think that the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the heartland of Indiana could have about as much impact on electricity generation in the idyllic island nation of Saint Kitts and Nevis as a cornstalk would have on an electrical socket - yet, our investigation into this electrifying conundrum begs to differ.

As researchers, we are constantly reminded that the world is a-maize-ing, and the synergies and correlations that emerge from seemingly unrelated phenomena are a constant source of wonder. The disparate nature of GMO cultivation and the generation of electricity might seem as unrelated as ear corn and a lightbulb, but our analysis has revealed an unexpected and statistically robust connection that has left us both stunned and pleasantly surprised.

The aim of this study is to peel back the layers of the corn husk, so to speak, and shine a light on the tantalizing relationship between the agricultural practices in the American Midwest and the electricity production in the Caribbean. While some might say we are cracking a-maize-ing codes or embarking on a shocking journey (pun intended), we take our investigation seriously in the hopes of illuminating the hidden ties between these two divergent activities.

With the field of research becoming increasingly complex, our study seeks to bring some levity to the discussion while producing robust statistical evidence to validate the surprising connections we unveil. Through our intensive exploration of data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we aim to sow the seeds of knowledge, cultivate a deeper understanding of this unlikely synergy, and provide a spark for further investigation into the agricultural-electric continuum. You may find yourself wondering if we are just husking around, but fear not - our findings are anything but corny.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connection: The Kernel-Currant Nexus Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and Electricity Generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The elusive relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) use in corn grown in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis has been a source of corn-fusion for researchers and pun enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into this electrifying link, utilizing data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration to spark our analysis. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9825280 and p < 0.01 for the time frame spanning 2003 to 2021. Through this cornucopia of data, we hope to shed light on this dynamic relationship and plant the seeds for further inquiry into the shocking synergy between agricultural practices and power generation.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interconnectedness of ecological systems never ceases to amaze researchers and laymen alike. One might think that the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the heartland of Indiana could have about as much impact on electricity generation in the idyllic island nation of Saint Kitts and Nevis as a cornstalk would have on an electrical socket - yet, our investigation into this electrifying conundrum begs to differ.
As researchers, we are constantly reminded that the world is a-maize-ing, and the synergies and correlations that emerge from seemingly unrelated phenomena are a constant source of wonder. The disparate nature of GMO cultivation and the generation of electricity might seem as unrelated as ear corn and a lightbulb, but our analysis has revealed an unexpected and statistically robust connection that has left us both stunned and pleasantly surprised.
The aim of this study is to peel back the layers of the corn husk, so to speak, and shine a light on the tantalizing relationship between the agricultural practices in the American Midwest and the electricity production in the Caribbean. While some might say we are cracking a-maize-ing codes or embarking on a shocking journey (pun intended), we take our investigation seriously in the hopes of illuminating the hidden ties between these two divergent activities.
With the field of research becoming increasingly complex, our study seeks to bring some levity to the discussion while producing robust statistical evidence to validate the surprising connections we unveil. Through our intensive exploration of data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we aim to sow the seeds of knowledge, cultivate a deeper understanding of this unlikely synergy, and provide a spark for further investigation into the agricultural-electric continuum. You may find yourself wondering if we are just husking around, but fear not - our findings are anything but corny.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith and Jones' Study on GMO Corn and Energy Generation," the authors find a statistically significant positive correlation between the cultivation of GMO corn in Indiana and the generation of electricity in Saint Kitts and Nevis. The study astutely notes that, much like the elusive search for the perfect popcorn-to-kernel ratio, understanding this connection requires a multidisciplinary approach that considers the agricultural and energy landscapes in both regions.

Building on this corn-tinuum of research, Doe and Co.'s investigation in "Corn, Currents, and Curiosities" dives deeper into the statistical intricacies, uncovering a shocking relationship between the number of genetically modified strands in corn crops and the kilowatt-hours produced by the coconut-powered generators of Saint Kitts and Nevis. The study cleverly emphasizes the need for further research to cultivate a more comprehensive understanding of the unexpected synergy between agriculture and electricity.

Moving beyond the academic realm, real world implications of this cornundrum take center stage in works such as "The Power of GMO: A Shocking Tale" and "Cornfields and Kilowatts: An Electrifying Odyssey," shedding light on the practical implications of this electrifying connection.

Additionally, fictional literature presents intriguing parallels, as seen in novels such as "Electric Maize Dreams" and "The Corn Identity," where the protagonists uncover a clandestine conspiracy involving genetically modified corn and a covert electrical revolution on a remote Caribbean island.

It is essential to consider the influence of popular culture on societal perceptions of this seemingly unlikely relationship. Films like "The Corn Ultimatum" and "Electric Ears: High Voltage Harvest" offer a cinematic exploration of the intertwining fates of GMO corn fields and electricity generation, blurring the lines between agricultural drama and electrifying action.

In considering the breadth of literature in this domain, it becomes evident that the intersection between GMO corn cultivation in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis is far from a mere kernel of truth; rather, it is an electrifying tapestry of interwoven narratives that continues to captivate both scientific inquiry and creative imagination alike.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2003 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connection: The Kernel-Currant Nexus Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and Electricity Generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The elusive relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) use in corn grown in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis has been a source of corn-fusion for researchers and pun enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into this electrifying link, utilizing data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration to spark our analysis. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9825280 and p < 0.01 for the time frame spanning 2003 to 2021. Through this cornucopia of data, we hope to shed light on this dynamic relationship and plant the seeds for further inquiry into the shocking synergy between agricultural practices and power generation.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interconnectedness of ecological systems never ceases to amaze researchers and laymen alike. One might think that the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the heartland of Indiana could have about as much impact on electricity generation in the idyllic island nation of Saint Kitts and Nevis as a cornstalk would have on an electrical socket - yet, our investigation into this electrifying conundrum begs to differ.
As researchers, we are constantly reminded that the world is a-maize-ing, and the synergies and correlations that emerge from seemingly unrelated phenomena are a constant source of wonder. The disparate nature of GMO cultivation and the generation of electricity might seem as unrelated as ear corn and a lightbulb, but our analysis has revealed an unexpected and statistically robust connection that has left us both stunned and pleasantly surprised.
The aim of this study is to peel back the layers of the corn husk, so to speak, and shine a light on the tantalizing relationship between the agricultural practices in the American Midwest and the electricity production in the Caribbean. While some might say we are cracking a-maize-ing codes or embarking on a shocking journey (pun intended), we take our investigation seriously in the hopes of illuminating the hidden ties between these two divergent activities.
With the field of research becoming increasingly complex, our study seeks to bring some levity to the discussion while producing robust statistical evidence to validate the surprising connections we unveil. Through our intensive exploration of data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we aim to sow the seeds of knowledge, cultivate a deeper understanding of this unlikely synergy, and provide a spark for further investigation into the agricultural-electric continuum. You may find yourself wondering if we are just husking around, but fear not - our findings are anything but corny.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the electrifying link between GMO corn cultivation in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis, our research team employed a highly meticulous and slightly whimsical approach. Utilizing data spanning the years 2003 to 2021, we embarked on a journey that could be likened to traversing a corn maze on a windy day - both perplexing and exhilarating.

Data Collection:
Our intrepid team scoured the vast expanse of the internet, navigating through the virtual fields of information to gather relevant data. While we primarily leaned on the agricultural treasure trove of the USDA and the electric energy expertise of the Energy Information Administration, we also ventured into the digital wilderness of scholarly articles and reputable databases to pluck the ripest data for our analysis. We acknowledge that our data collection process may sound as convoluted as a corn-rowing machine in a tornado, but rest assured, we wielded statistical shears to trim away any potential biases.

Cultivating Variables:
In cultivating our variables for analysis, we embraced a diversity akin to the varieties of corn in the Great Corn Belt itself. For GMO corn cultivation in Indiana, we meticulously compiled data on acreage, yield, and GMO adoption rates. As for the electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis, we harvested data on generation capacity, fuel mix, and electricity production. Uniting these diverse aspects was no small feat, but we found our statistical crop to be as bountiful as an Indiana cornfield in late summer.

Statistical Analysis:
In sifting through our data harvest, we deployed an arsenal of statistical tools that could rival the assortment of gadgets in a farmer's shed. Our analysis involved correlation coefficients that were more intricately entwined than a tangle of cornstalks, and regression models that teased out the hidden patterns lurking within our data. Upon wrangling our data with extreme care, we were able to extract insights that were as illuminating as a well-lit corn maze.

Considerations and Limitations:
Like any research endeavor, our study was not without its ear-cobbling moments. While we endeavored to meticulously control for confounding variables, we remain mindful of the potential for unmeasured factors to cast a shadow over our findings. Additionally, the variability and complexity of both the agricultural and energy sectors introduce a level of nuance that cannot be captured in its entirety by our statistical machinations. Conversely, the robustness of our chosen datasets provides a strong foundation for our analysis.

In conclusion, our methodology, while sprinkled with humor and whimsy, was underpinned by a rigorous and comprehensive approach to uncovering the shocking connection between GMO corn cultivation in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis. Our findings, much like the harvest after a season of toiling in the fields, promise to yield fruitful insights and furnish fertile ground for further investigation into this captivating multidisciplinary junction.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2003 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9825280, r-squared of 0.9653612, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connection: The Kernel-Currant Nexus Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and Electricity Generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The elusive relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) use in corn grown in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis has been a source of corn-fusion for researchers and pun enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into this electrifying link, utilizing data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration to spark our analysis. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9825280 and p < 0.01 for the time frame spanning 2003 to 2021. Through this cornucopia of data, we hope to shed light on this dynamic relationship and plant the seeds for further inquiry into the shocking synergy between agricultural practices and power generation.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The interconnectedness of ecological systems never ceases to amaze researchers and laymen alike. One might think that the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the heartland of Indiana could have about as much impact on electricity generation in the idyllic island nation of Saint Kitts and Nevis as a cornstalk would have on an electrical socket - yet, our investigation into this electrifying conundrum begs to differ.
As researchers, we are constantly reminded that the world is a-maize-ing, and the synergies and correlations that emerge from seemingly unrelated phenomena are a constant source of wonder. The disparate nature of GMO cultivation and the generation of electricity might seem as unrelated as ear corn and a lightbulb, but our analysis has revealed an unexpected and statistically robust connection that has left us both stunned and pleasantly surprised.
The aim of this study is to peel back the layers of the corn husk, so to speak, and shine a light on the tantalizing relationship between the agricultural practices in the American Midwest and the electricity production in the Caribbean. While some might say we are cracking a-maize-ing codes or embarking on a shocking journey (pun intended), we take our investigation seriously in the hopes of illuminating the hidden ties between these two divergent activities.
With the field of research becoming increasingly complex, our study seeks to bring some levity to the discussion while producing robust statistical evidence to validate the surprising connections we unveil. Through our intensive exploration of data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we aim to sow the seeds of knowledge, cultivate a deeper understanding of this unlikely synergy, and provide a spark for further investigation into the agricultural-electric continuum. You may find yourself wondering if we are just husking around, but fear not - our findings are anything but corny.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the relationship between GMO corn cultivation in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis are nothing short of electrifying! Our analysis uncovered a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9825280, indicating a strong positive linear relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) further confirmed the powerful association, with a value of 0.9653612, illuminating just how tightly these variables are linked. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings are statistically significant, providing a jolt of confidence in the robustness of the observed relationship.

Fig. 1 illustrates this eye-popping correlation with a scatterplot that demonstrates the striking coherence between GMO corn use in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis. The data points practically leap off the page, leaving no doubt that there is a kernel-currant connection at play.

In summary, our results not only confirm the surprising correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors but also hint at an underlying unity in the grand symphony of interconnected systems. This shocking revelation promises to spark new avenues of inquiry and plant the seeds for further exploration into the electrifying nexus between agricultural practices and power generation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connection: The Kernel-Currant Nexus Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and Electricity Generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The elusive relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) use in corn grown in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis has been a source of corn-fusion for researchers and pun enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into this electrifying link, utilizing data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration to spark our analysis. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9825280 and p < 0.01 for the time frame spanning 2003 to 2021. Through this cornucopia of data, we hope to shed light on this dynamic relationship and plant the seeds for further inquiry into the shocking synergy between agricultural practices and power generation.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith and Jones' Study on GMO Corn and Energy Generation," the authors find a statistically significant positive correlation between the cultivation of GMO corn in Indiana and the generation of electricity in Saint Kitts and Nevis. The study astutely notes that, much like the elusive search for the perfect popcorn-to-kernel ratio, understanding this connection requires a multidisciplinary approach that considers the agricultural and energy landscapes in both regions.
Building on this corn-tinuum of research, Doe and Co.'s investigation in "Corn, Currents, and Curiosities" dives deeper into the statistical intricacies, uncovering a shocking relationship between the number of genetically modified strands in corn crops and the kilowatt-hours produced by the coconut-powered generators of Saint Kitts and Nevis. The study cleverly emphasizes the need for further research to cultivate a more comprehensive understanding of the unexpected synergy between agriculture and electricity.
Moving beyond the academic realm, real world implications of this cornundrum take center stage in works such as "The Power of GMO: A Shocking Tale" and "Cornfields and Kilowatts: An Electrifying Odyssey," shedding light on the practical implications of this electrifying connection.
Additionally, fictional literature presents intriguing parallels, as seen in novels such as "Electric Maize Dreams" and "The Corn Identity," where the protagonists uncover a clandestine conspiracy involving genetically modified corn and a covert electrical revolution on a remote Caribbean island.
It is essential to consider the influence of popular culture on societal perceptions of this seemingly unlikely relationship. Films like "The Corn Ultimatum" and "Electric Ears: High Voltage Harvest" offer a cinematic exploration of the intertwining fates of GMO corn fields and electricity generation, blurring the lines between agricultural drama and electrifying action.
In considering the breadth of literature in this domain, it becomes evident that the intersection between GMO corn cultivation in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis is far from a mere kernel of truth; rather, it is an electrifying tapestry of interwoven narratives that continues to captivate both scientific inquiry and creative imagination alike.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the relationship between GMO corn cultivation in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis are nothing short of electrifying! Our analysis uncovered a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9825280, indicating a strong positive linear relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) further confirmed the powerful association, with a value of 0.9653612, illuminating just how tightly these variables are linked. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings are statistically significant, providing a jolt of confidence in the robustness of the observed relationship.
Fig. 1 illustrates this eye-popping correlation with a scatterplot that demonstrates the striking coherence between GMO corn use in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis. The data points practically leap off the page, leaving no doubt that there is a kernel-currant connection at play.
In summary, our results not only confirm the surprising correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors but also hint at an underlying unity in the grand symphony of interconnected systems. This shocking revelation promises to spark new avenues of inquiry and plant the seeds for further exploration into the electrifying nexus between agricultural practices and power generation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The intriguing link between GMO corn cultivation in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis has long been the subject of speculation, agricultural acumen, and pun-tastic wordplay. Our findings not only validate the previous research but also illuminate the profound nature of this kernel-currant nexus.

Building on the work of "Smith and Jones," we have demonstrated a robust positive correlation that electrifies the connection between GMO corn use and electricity generation. This synergy, much like the curious case of corn's cob-nection to current, defies conventional logic and highlights the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate domains. Our results, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9825280 and a minuscule p-value, provide a compelling statistical endorsement of the interconnectedness between these two diverse phenomena.

Flipping the pages back to the corn-tinuum of research, the studies by "Doe and Co." have paved the way for our investigation, delving into the electrifying intricacies of corn cultivation and power generation. Their emphasis on the need for further research rings true, especially in light of our current findings, which lay the groundwork for delving deeper into the electrifying saga of GMO corn and electricity generation.

The literature review, which chronicled the cornucopia of knowledge on this electrifying conjunction, illuminated not only the scientific endeavors but also the cultural and cinematic representations of this surprising partnership. As the protagonists in "Electric Maize Dreams" and "The Corn Identity" unraveled a covert conspiracy involving GMO corn and a clandestine electrical revolution, our research now serves as a real-world catalyst for uncovering the volt-age of this electrifying tale.

Moreover, our results echo the implications highlighted in "The Power of GMO: A Shocking Tale" and "Cornfields and Kilowatts: An Electrifying Odyssey," underscoring the real-world impact of this cornundrum. As we venture into the uncharted territories of agricultural-electrical intrigue, our findings provide a jolt of excitement for practitioners and policymakers alike.

In conclusion, our study not only affirms the electrically charged relationship between GMO corn cultivation in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis but also serves as a fulcrum for facilitating further research and discourse on this fascinating kernel-currant nexus. The sparks fly as we collectively embark on a journey to unearth the enthralling narratives and practical implications of this unexpected synergy, illuminating the path towards a deeper understanding of the electrifying symphony between agriculture and power generation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Connection: The Kernel-Currant Nexus Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and Electricity Generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The elusive relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) use in corn grown in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis has been a source of corn-fusion for researchers and pun enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into this electrifying link, utilizing data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration to spark our analysis. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9825280 and p < 0.01 for the time frame spanning 2003 to 2021. Through this cornucopia of data, we hope to shed light on this dynamic relationship and plant the seeds for further inquiry into the shocking synergy between agricultural practices and power generation.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The interconnectedness of ecological systems never ceases to amaze researchers and laymen alike. One might think that the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the heartland of Indiana could have about as much impact on electricity generation in the idyllic island nation of Saint Kitts and Nevis as a cornstalk would have on an electrical socket - yet, our investigation into this electrifying conundrum begs to differ.
As researchers, we are constantly reminded that the world is a-maize-ing, and the synergies and correlations that emerge from seemingly unrelated phenomena are a constant source of wonder. The disparate nature of GMO cultivation and the generation of electricity might seem as unrelated as ear corn and a lightbulb, but our analysis has revealed an unexpected and statistically robust connection that has left us both stunned and pleasantly surprised.
The aim of this study is to peel back the layers of the corn husk, so to speak, and shine a light on the tantalizing relationship between the agricultural practices in the American Midwest and the electricity production in the Caribbean. While some might say we are cracking a-maize-ing codes or embarking on a shocking journey (pun intended), we take our investigation seriously in the hopes of illuminating the hidden ties between these two divergent activities.
With the field of research becoming increasingly complex, our study seeks to bring some levity to the discussion while producing robust statistical evidence to validate the surprising connections we unveil. Through our intensive exploration of data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we aim to sow the seeds of knowledge, cultivate a deeper understanding of this unlikely synergy, and provide a spark for further investigation into the agricultural-electric continuum. You may find yourself wondering if we are just husking around, but fear not - our findings are anything but corny.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the relationship between GMO corn cultivation in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis are nothing short of electrifying! Our analysis uncovered a shockingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9825280, indicating a strong positive linear relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) further confirmed the powerful association, with a value of 0.9653612, illuminating just how tightly these variables are linked. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings are statistically significant, providing a jolt of confidence in the robustness of the observed relationship.
Fig. 1 illustrates this eye-popping correlation with a scatterplot that demonstrates the striking coherence between GMO corn use in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis. The data points practically leap off the page, leaving no doubt that there is a kernel-currant connection at play.
In summary, our results not only confirm the surprising correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors but also hint at an underlying unity in the grand symphony of interconnected systems. This shocking revelation promises to spark new avenues of inquiry and plant the seeds for further exploration into the electrifying nexus between agricultural practices and power generation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has shed light on the electrifying connection between GMO corn cultivation in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis. It's clear that this unlikely pair has quite the "shocking" relationship - it's like they're earresistibly attracted to each other! The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9825280 has left us feeling positively "cornfounded" - who knew that corn and electricity could be in such a "kernal" relationship?

Our findings suggest that the power generated in Saint Kitts and Nevis may have some "corny" origins indeed, and the notion of corn power is no longer just a-maize-ing fantasy. Perhaps we should start thinking about "ear-lectricity" instead of electricity!

However, despite the temptation to crack many more corny jokes, we must assert that no further research is needed in this area. The statistical evidence speaks volumes, and it's safe to say that we have successfully unearthed and illuminated this intriguing, albeit unconventional, connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Shocking Connection: The Kernel-Currant Nexus Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and Electricity Generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agronomic Amperage


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Shocking Connection: The Kernel-Currant Nexus Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and Electricity Generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Global Agricultural and Energy Nexus Research Institute (GAENRI)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Shocking Connection: The Kernel-Currant Nexus Between GMO Corn Cultivation in Indiana and Electricity Generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis with an abstract of The elusive relationship between genetically modified organism (GMO) use in corn grown in Indiana and electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis has been a source of corn-fusion for researchers and pun enthusiasts alike. In this study, we delve into this electrifying link, utilizing data from the USDA and Energy Information Administration to spark our analysis. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9825280 and p < 0.01 for the time frame spanning 2003 to 2021. Through this cornucopia of data, we hope to shed light on this dynamic relationship and plant the seeds for further inquiry into the shocking synergy between agricultural practices and power generation.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn cultivation Indiana, electricity generation Saint Kitts Nevis, correlation coefficient GMO corn electricity generation, USDA data electricity generation analysis, GMO corn cultivation impact electricity generation, Indiana corn production, Saint Kitts Nevis power generation, agricultural practices electricity generation correlation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Indiana
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Indiana genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Indiana

Electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis
Detailed data title: Total electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis

Correlation r = 0.9825280 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9653612 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 96.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Indiana) over the 19 years from 2003 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.5E-14. 0.0000000000000747231002292832
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 7.5E-12% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 13,382,742,377,278 random variables You don't actually need 13 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.95, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in corn grown in Indiana (GMO corn %)12412305555565660737876757577767478
Electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis (Billion kWh)0.1190.1220.1250.1270.1570.1670.1730.1790.1890.20.2060.206340.2026740.2118860.212740.213740.213740.2032420.215865




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,2,4,12,30,55,55,56,56,60,73,78,76,75,75,77,76,74,78,])
array_2 = np.array([0.119,0.122,0.125,0.127,0.157,0.167,0.173,0.179,0.189,0.2,0.206,0.20634,0.202674,0.211886,0.21274,0.21374,0.21374,0.203242,0.215865,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Indiana"
array_2_name = "Electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 2047 · Black Variable ID: 740 · Red Variable ID: 23931
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0