Report an error
GMO use in corn grown in Indiana correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Electricity generation in Saint Kitts and Nevis | r=0.98 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Geothermal power generated in Iceland | r=0.97 | 19yrs | No |
Organic Food Sales Volume in the United States | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
Rogers Communications' stock price (RCI) | r=0.93 | 21yrs | Yes! |
Fomento Econ's stock price (FMX) | r=0.91 | 21yrs | No |
Customer satisfaction with Nordstrom | r=0.9 | 18yrs | No |
Google searches for 'i cant even' | r=0.9 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series | r=0.46 | 11yrs | No |
GMO use in corn grown in Indiana also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)