about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,019 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Rocky and the second variable is Air pollution in Provo, Utah.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Fewer people were yelling "Yo, Adrian!" and revving up their cars in excitement.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Cute 2D animation ] prompt: Create an adorable scene in a bustling park in Provo, Utah, with children named Rocky joyfully playing amongst vibrant trees and chirping birds. Everyone is wearing delightful face masks, and the sun, with a determined expression, tries to shine through the pollution, casting shimmering rays on the children. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Rocky and Poor air quality in Provo, Utah. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyberpunk Steampunk Cute 2D animation Brutalism Art nouveau
ChatGPT: Cute 2D animation

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Rocky and Poor air quality in Provo, Utah together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling park in Provo, Utah, children with the name Rocky run and play under a hazy sky. People wear masks as they walk by, and the sun struggles to shine through the pollution.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute 2D animation ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling park in Provo, Utah, children with the name Rocky run and play under a hazy sky. People wear masks as they walk by, and the sun struggles to shine through the pollution. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Cute 2D animation ] prompt: Create an adorable scene in a bustling park in Provo, Utah, with children named Rocky joyfully playing amongst vibrant trees and chirping birds. Everyone is wearing delightful face masks, and the sun, with a determined expression, tries to shine through the pollution, casting shimmering rays on the children.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Rocky caused Air pollution in Provo, Utah to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Rocky Air: The Air-ia of Rocky Names and Pollution Levels in Provo, Utah

Journal of Rocky Air Quality Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rocky and Air pollution in Provo, Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6183992 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Rocky Air: The Air-ia of Rocky Names and Pollution Levels in Provo, Utah"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The phenomenon of baby names and air pollution may seem unrelated, but our study delves into the surprising connection between the popularity of the first name "Rocky" and air pollution in the scenic town of Provo, Utah. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we employed rigorous statistical methods to explore this whimsical relationship. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6183992 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning 1980 to 2018. Intriguingly, the hazier the air, the rockier the names, as our findings shed light on this peculiar correlation. This study not only adds a breath of fresh air to the field of baby name research but also offers a breath-taking view of the unexpected interplay between personal nomenclature and environmental factors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rocky and Air pollution in Provo, Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rocky Air: The Air-ia of Rocky Names and Pollution Levels in Provo, Utah"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The phenomenon of baby names and air pollution may seem unrelated, but our study delves into the surprising connection between the popularity of the first name "Rocky" and air pollution in the scenic town of Provo, Utah. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we employed rigorous statistical methods to explore this whimsical relationship. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6183992 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning 1980 to 2018. Intriguingly, the hazier the air, the rockier the names, as our findings shed light on this peculiar correlation. This study not only adds a breath of fresh air to the field of baby name research but also offers a breath-taking view of the unexpected interplay between personal nomenclature and environmental factors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The naming of children is a decision filled with endless possibilities and implications. Whether it be influenced by familial tradition, cultural heritage, or the quest for originality, the choice of a name carries a weight of significance, setting the stage for an individual's identity from birth. Similarly, air pollution is a pressing environmental issue that affects public health and ecosystems, with its own complexities and ramifications.

Yet, amidst the solemnity of these two subjects, a whimsical question emerged: could there be a correlation between the popularity of a particular first name and levels of air pollution? This seemingly incongruous connection piqued our curiosity and led to the investigation that we present in this study.

For decades, the name "Rocky" has been both a source of inspiration and an embodiment of resilience, conjuring images of the determined boxer Rocky Balboa and the majestic Rocky Mountains. Meanwhile, Provo, Utah, with its charming landscapes, has been a picturesque backdrop for residents and visitors alike. The intertwining of these seemingly disparate elements forms the backdrop for our investigation.

Our study aims to uncover patterns in the data of the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, shedding light on the potential link between the frequency of the name "Rocky" and the level of air pollution in Provo, Utah. The intersection of the playful and the profound, the fanciful and the factual, as we examine this correlation, proves to be an enthralling prospect. While the initial notion may appear lighthearted, our rigorous statistical methods and meticulous data analysis aim to lend gravity to our findings.

With this in mind, we embark on a journey to explore the unexpected relationship between personal nomenclature and environmental factors. Through our scholarly pursuit, we seek to bring clarity to this hazy correlation and, in doing so, contribute a breath of fresh air to the world of name research and environmental science. Thus, we invite readers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic "Rocky Air" and its intriguing implications for the social and environmental landscapes of Provo, Utah.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rocky and Air pollution in Provo, Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rocky Air: The Air-ia of Rocky Names and Pollution Levels in Provo, Utah"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The phenomenon of baby names and air pollution may seem unrelated, but our study delves into the surprising connection between the popularity of the first name "Rocky" and air pollution in the scenic town of Provo, Utah. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we employed rigorous statistical methods to explore this whimsical relationship. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6183992 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning 1980 to 2018. Intriguingly, the hazier the air, the rockier the names, as our findings shed light on this peculiar correlation. This study not only adds a breath of fresh air to the field of baby name research but also offers a breath-taking view of the unexpected interplay between personal nomenclature and environmental factors.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The naming of children is a decision filled with endless possibilities and implications. Whether it be influenced by familial tradition, cultural heritage, or the quest for originality, the choice of a name carries a weight of significance, setting the stage for an individual's identity from birth. Similarly, air pollution is a pressing environmental issue that affects public health and ecosystems, with its own complexities and ramifications.
Yet, amidst the solemnity of these two subjects, a whimsical question emerged: could there be a correlation between the popularity of a particular first name and levels of air pollution? This seemingly incongruous connection piqued our curiosity and led to the investigation that we present in this study.
For decades, the name "Rocky" has been both a source of inspiration and an embodiment of resilience, conjuring images of the determined boxer Rocky Balboa and the majestic Rocky Mountains. Meanwhile, Provo, Utah, with its charming landscapes, has been a picturesque backdrop for residents and visitors alike. The intertwining of these seemingly disparate elements forms the backdrop for our investigation.
Our study aims to uncover patterns in the data of the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, shedding light on the potential link between the frequency of the name "Rocky" and the level of air pollution in Provo, Utah. The intersection of the playful and the profound, the fanciful and the factual, as we examine this correlation, proves to be an enthralling prospect. While the initial notion may appear lighthearted, our rigorous statistical methods and meticulous data analysis aim to lend gravity to our findings.
With this in mind, we embark on a journey to explore the unexpected relationship between personal nomenclature and environmental factors. Through our scholarly pursuit, we seek to bring clarity to this hazy correlation and, in doing so, contribute a breath of fresh air to the world of name research and environmental science. Thus, we invite readers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic "Rocky Air" and its intriguing implications for the social and environmental landscapes of Provo, Utah.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of the potential connection between the popularity of the first name "Rocky" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah has unearthed a diverse array of scholarly and literary works that touch on elements of personal nomenclature, environmental factors, and the unexpected blending of the playful and the profound. Smith and Doe (2005) examine patterns in baby name trends, shedding light on the societal influences that shape naming practices. Meanwhile, Jones (2010) delves into the complexities of air pollution and its impact on public health, offering a comprehensive analysis of environmental factors.

Moving beyond the realm of academic research, "The Baby Name Wizard" by Laura Wattenberg provides an engaging exploration of naming patterns, offering insights into the cultural and historical influences that shape naming practices. Additionally, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner takes a captivating look at unconventional correlations and unexpected relationships, setting the stage for our own investigation into the peculiar link between the name "Rocky" and air pollution levels.

In the realm of fiction, "Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs" by Judi Barrett offers a whimsical portrayal of unexpected weather phenomena, prompting contemplation on the potential whimsy of air quality. Moreover, the legendary "Rocky" film series featuring Sylvester Stallone introduces an iconic character whose resilience and determination may reverberate within the landscapes of Provo, Utah, as we contemplate the potential ramifications of the "Rocky" name phenomenon.

On a more lighthearted note, the animated series "Rocky and Bullwinkle" presents a playful dynamic between a tenacious squirrel and a well-intentioned moose, offering a light-hearted backdrop for our exploration of the unexpected correlation between personal nomenclature and environmental factors. Similarly, the children's show "Dora the Explorer" invites viewers on a journey of exploration and discovery, mirroring our own scholarly pursuit of unraveling the enigmatic "Rocky Air" and its implications.

In synthesizing the various sources, we are poised to embark on our own investigation, delving into the enthralling interplay of personal names and environmental influences as we seek to elucidate the unexpected relationship between the name "Rocky" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rocky and Air pollution in Provo, Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1980 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rocky Air: The Air-ia of Rocky Names and Pollution Levels in Provo, Utah"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The phenomenon of baby names and air pollution may seem unrelated, but our study delves into the surprising connection between the popularity of the first name "Rocky" and air pollution in the scenic town of Provo, Utah. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we employed rigorous statistical methods to explore this whimsical relationship. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6183992 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning 1980 to 2018. Intriguingly, the hazier the air, the rockier the names, as our findings shed light on this peculiar correlation. This study not only adds a breath of fresh air to the field of baby name research but also offers a breath-taking view of the unexpected interplay between personal nomenclature and environmental factors.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The naming of children is a decision filled with endless possibilities and implications. Whether it be influenced by familial tradition, cultural heritage, or the quest for originality, the choice of a name carries a weight of significance, setting the stage for an individual's identity from birth. Similarly, air pollution is a pressing environmental issue that affects public health and ecosystems, with its own complexities and ramifications.
Yet, amidst the solemnity of these two subjects, a whimsical question emerged: could there be a correlation between the popularity of a particular first name and levels of air pollution? This seemingly incongruous connection piqued our curiosity and led to the investigation that we present in this study.
For decades, the name "Rocky" has been both a source of inspiration and an embodiment of resilience, conjuring images of the determined boxer Rocky Balboa and the majestic Rocky Mountains. Meanwhile, Provo, Utah, with its charming landscapes, has been a picturesque backdrop for residents and visitors alike. The intertwining of these seemingly disparate elements forms the backdrop for our investigation.
Our study aims to uncover patterns in the data of the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, shedding light on the potential link between the frequency of the name "Rocky" and the level of air pollution in Provo, Utah. The intersection of the playful and the profound, the fanciful and the factual, as we examine this correlation, proves to be an enthralling prospect. While the initial notion may appear lighthearted, our rigorous statistical methods and meticulous data analysis aim to lend gravity to our findings.
With this in mind, we embark on a journey to explore the unexpected relationship between personal nomenclature and environmental factors. Through our scholarly pursuit, we seek to bring clarity to this hazy correlation and, in doing so, contribute a breath of fresh air to the world of name research and environmental science. Thus, we invite readers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic "Rocky Air" and its intriguing implications for the social and environmental landscapes of Provo, Utah.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To explore the intriguing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Rocky" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah, our research team employed a range of methodological approaches. Data on the frequency of the name "Rocky" was obtained from the US Social Security Administration, while information on air pollution levels in Provo, Utah, was sourced from the Environmental Protection Agency. The study period spanned from 1980 to 2018, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of trends over nearly four decades.

The first step in our methodology involved the compilation and organization of the "Rocky" name frequency data from the US Social Security Administration. The data were carefully curated and processed to ensure accuracy and completeness, providing a robust foundation for our subsequent analysis. Meanwhile, air pollution data for Provo, Utah, were meticulously collected and verified to capture the dynamic fluctuations in pollution levels over the study period.

To establish the association between the popularity of the name "Rocky" and air pollution levels, advanced statistical methods were employed. A series of correlation analyses were conducted, with a primary focus on identifying the strength and direction of the relationship between the two variables. The utilization of rigorous statistical techniques allowed for the estimation of correlation coefficients and associated significance levels, providing empirical evidence of the connection under investigation.

Furthermore, to account for potential confounding variables and temporal dynamics, multivariate regression models were employed to examine the relationship between the frequency of the name "Rocky" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah. This approach facilitated the isolation of the specific impact of the "Rocky" name popularity on air pollution, controlling for other relevant factors that may influence pollution levels in the region.

In addition, temporal analysis techniques, including time series modeling and trend exploration, were utilized to capture the evolving nature of the relationship over the study period. This allowed for a deeper understanding of the long-term trends and fluctuations in both the frequency of the name "Rocky" and air pollution levels, offering valuable insights into the dynamic interplay between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.

Moreover, spatial analysis methods were applied to examine variations in the correlation across different geographical regions within Provo, Utah. By considering spatial heterogeneity, our study aimed to uncover potential localized patterns in the relationship between the "Rocky" name popularity and air pollution levels, offering a nuanced perspective on the geographic dynamics of this association.

Overall, the methodology employed in this study integrated robust data collection, advanced statistical analyses, and comprehensive modeling techniques to elucidate the intricate relationship between the popularity of the name "Rocky" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah. The interdisciplinary nature of our approach, combining elements of demography, environmental science, and statistical modeling, provided a holistic framework for unraveling this unique and unexpected correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rocky and Air pollution in Provo, Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 1980 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.6183992, r-squared of 0.3824176, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Rocky Air: The Air-ia of Rocky Names and Pollution Levels in Provo, Utah"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The phenomenon of baby names and air pollution may seem unrelated, but our study delves into the surprising connection between the popularity of the first name "Rocky" and air pollution in the scenic town of Provo, Utah. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we employed rigorous statistical methods to explore this whimsical relationship. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6183992 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning 1980 to 2018. Intriguingly, the hazier the air, the rockier the names, as our findings shed light on this peculiar correlation. This study not only adds a breath of fresh air to the field of baby name research but also offers a breath-taking view of the unexpected interplay between personal nomenclature and environmental factors.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The naming of children is a decision filled with endless possibilities and implications. Whether it be influenced by familial tradition, cultural heritage, or the quest for originality, the choice of a name carries a weight of significance, setting the stage for an individual's identity from birth. Similarly, air pollution is a pressing environmental issue that affects public health and ecosystems, with its own complexities and ramifications.
Yet, amidst the solemnity of these two subjects, a whimsical question emerged: could there be a correlation between the popularity of a particular first name and levels of air pollution? This seemingly incongruous connection piqued our curiosity and led to the investigation that we present in this study.
For decades, the name "Rocky" has been both a source of inspiration and an embodiment of resilience, conjuring images of the determined boxer Rocky Balboa and the majestic Rocky Mountains. Meanwhile, Provo, Utah, with its charming landscapes, has been a picturesque backdrop for residents and visitors alike. The intertwining of these seemingly disparate elements forms the backdrop for our investigation.
Our study aims to uncover patterns in the data of the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, shedding light on the potential link between the frequency of the name "Rocky" and the level of air pollution in Provo, Utah. The intersection of the playful and the profound, the fanciful and the factual, as we examine this correlation, proves to be an enthralling prospect. While the initial notion may appear lighthearted, our rigorous statistical methods and meticulous data analysis aim to lend gravity to our findings.
With this in mind, we embark on a journey to explore the unexpected relationship between personal nomenclature and environmental factors. Through our scholarly pursuit, we seek to bring clarity to this hazy correlation and, in doing so, contribute a breath of fresh air to the world of name research and environmental science. Thus, we invite readers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic "Rocky Air" and its intriguing implications for the social and environmental landscapes of Provo, Utah.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a notable correlation between the popularity of the first name "Rocky" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah. Over the period from 1980 to 2018, a correlation coefficient of 0.6183992 and an r-squared value of 0.3824176 were obtained, indicating a moderately strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further supports the significance of this correlation.

The scatterplot in Fig. 1 provides a visual representation of the observed correlation, demonstrating a clear trend that may surprise even the most skeptical observers. The upward sloping pattern of the data points depicts the curious coupling of "Rocky" names with higher levels of air pollution, offering an intriguing visual insight into this unexpected relationship.

The findings of this study expand our understanding of the intricate interplay between personal names and environmental influences. The remarkable correlation between the popularity of the name "Rocky" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah prompts further reflection on the underlying factors driving this peculiar association. While the notion of names affecting air quality may seem far-fetched at first glance, our rigorous statistical analysis brings this whimsical connection to the forefront of scholarly discourse.

In conclusion, our investigation into the "Rocky Air" phenomenon presents a compelling case for the unanticipated link between personal nomenclature and environmental conditions. The implications of this study reach beyond the realms of traditional research inquiries, offering a fresh perspective on the intricate tapestry of human identity and environmental phenomena. This research not only adds a breath of fresh air to the field of baby name studies but also invites us to marvel at the curious dance of personal names and atmospheric factors.

These findings urge further exploration into the potential influence of names on environmental dynamics, marking a captivating departure from conventional research inquiries. While the connection between "Rocky" names and air pollution in Provo, Utah may initially appear whimsical, the statistical evidence speaks volumes about the underlying correlation, inviting scholars to dive deeper into the captivating world of unusual name-environment relationships.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rocky and Air pollution in Provo, Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Rocky Air: The Air-ia of Rocky Names and Pollution Levels in Provo, Utah"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The phenomenon of baby names and air pollution may seem unrelated, but our study delves into the surprising connection between the popularity of the first name "Rocky" and air pollution in the scenic town of Provo, Utah. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we employed rigorous statistical methods to explore this whimsical relationship. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6183992 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning 1980 to 2018. Intriguingly, the hazier the air, the rockier the names, as our findings shed light on this peculiar correlation. This study not only adds a breath of fresh air to the field of baby name research but also offers a breath-taking view of the unexpected interplay between personal nomenclature and environmental factors.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of the potential connection between the popularity of the first name "Rocky" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah has unearthed a diverse array of scholarly and literary works that touch on elements of personal nomenclature, environmental factors, and the unexpected blending of the playful and the profound. Smith and Doe (2005) examine patterns in baby name trends, shedding light on the societal influences that shape naming practices. Meanwhile, Jones (2010) delves into the complexities of air pollution and its impact on public health, offering a comprehensive analysis of environmental factors.
Moving beyond the realm of academic research, "The Baby Name Wizard" by Laura Wattenberg provides an engaging exploration of naming patterns, offering insights into the cultural and historical influences that shape naming practices. Additionally, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner takes a captivating look at unconventional correlations and unexpected relationships, setting the stage for our own investigation into the peculiar link between the name "Rocky" and air pollution levels.
In the realm of fiction, "Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs" by Judi Barrett offers a whimsical portrayal of unexpected weather phenomena, prompting contemplation on the potential whimsy of air quality. Moreover, the legendary "Rocky" film series featuring Sylvester Stallone introduces an iconic character whose resilience and determination may reverberate within the landscapes of Provo, Utah, as we contemplate the potential ramifications of the "Rocky" name phenomenon.
On a more lighthearted note, the animated series "Rocky and Bullwinkle" presents a playful dynamic between a tenacious squirrel and a well-intentioned moose, offering a light-hearted backdrop for our exploration of the unexpected correlation between personal nomenclature and environmental factors. Similarly, the children's show "Dora the Explorer" invites viewers on a journey of exploration and discovery, mirroring our own scholarly pursuit of unraveling the enigmatic "Rocky Air" and its implications.
In synthesizing the various sources, we are poised to embark on our own investigation, delving into the enthralling interplay of personal names and environmental influences as we seek to elucidate the unexpected relationship between the name "Rocky" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a notable correlation between the popularity of the first name "Rocky" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah. Over the period from 1980 to 2018, a correlation coefficient of 0.6183992 and an r-squared value of 0.3824176 were obtained, indicating a moderately strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further supports the significance of this correlation.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 provides a visual representation of the observed correlation, demonstrating a clear trend that may surprise even the most skeptical observers. The upward sloping pattern of the data points depicts the curious coupling of "Rocky" names with higher levels of air pollution, offering an intriguing visual insight into this unexpected relationship.
The findings of this study expand our understanding of the intricate interplay between personal names and environmental influences. The remarkable correlation between the popularity of the name "Rocky" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah prompts further reflection on the underlying factors driving this peculiar association. While the notion of names affecting air quality may seem far-fetched at first glance, our rigorous statistical analysis brings this whimsical connection to the forefront of scholarly discourse.
In conclusion, our investigation into the "Rocky Air" phenomenon presents a compelling case for the unanticipated link between personal nomenclature and environmental conditions. The implications of this study reach beyond the realms of traditional research inquiries, offering a fresh perspective on the intricate tapestry of human identity and environmental phenomena. This research not only adds a breath of fresh air to the field of baby name studies but also invites us to marvel at the curious dance of personal names and atmospheric factors.
These findings urge further exploration into the potential influence of names on environmental dynamics, marking a captivating departure from conventional research inquiries. While the connection between "Rocky" names and air pollution in Provo, Utah may initially appear whimsical, the statistical evidence speaks volumes about the underlying correlation, inviting scholars to dive deeper into the captivating world of unusual name-environment relationships.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have illuminated a rather surprising relationship between the popularity of the first name "Rocky" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah. Our results align with the prior research highlighting unexpected correlations and offbeat relationships, as elucidated by Jones (2010) and the captivating exploration of unconventional connections in "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.6183992 and the striking scatterplot pattern support the whimsical notion of a connection between personal nomenclature and atmospheric conditions, echoing the levity found in the playful dynamic of "Rocky and Bullwinkle."

It is intriguing to note that the hazier the air, the more prevalent the "Rocky" names in the region of Provo, Utah, peaking curiosity akin to the whimsical portrayal of unexpected weather phenomena in "Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs" by Barrett. This unexpected relationship offers a fresh breeze in the field of baby name studies, mirroring the whimsy and curiosity found in "Dora the Explorer."

While our findings may appear to tread on the border of fanciful speculation, the robust statistical evidence lends a weighty gravitas to this curious correlation. The correlation coefficient and p-value underscore the significance of this unexpected relationship, anchoring the seemingly whimsical "Rocky Air" phenomenon in the realm of empirical observation and scholarly discourse.

In conclusion, our study not only sheds light on the unanticipated link between personal names and environmental conditions but also invites a contemplation of the whimsical and the profound in the realm of research inquiries. The results serve as a testament to the enthralling narrative of unusual name-environment relationships, underscoring the captivating interplay between societal phenomena and environmental dynamics. This study adds an unexpected twist to the landscape of academic inquiry, offering a breath-taking panorama of the potential interconnections that lurk beneath the surface of seemingly disparate domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Rocky and Air pollution in Provo, Utah. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Rocky Air: The Air-ia of Rocky Names and Pollution Levels in Provo, Utah"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The phenomenon of baby names and air pollution may seem unrelated, but our study delves into the surprising connection between the popularity of the first name "Rocky" and air pollution in the scenic town of Provo, Utah. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we employed rigorous statistical methods to explore this whimsical relationship. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6183992 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning 1980 to 2018. Intriguingly, the hazier the air, the rockier the names, as our findings shed light on this peculiar correlation. This study not only adds a breath of fresh air to the field of baby name research but also offers a breath-taking view of the unexpected interplay between personal nomenclature and environmental factors.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The naming of children is a decision filled with endless possibilities and implications. Whether it be influenced by familial tradition, cultural heritage, or the quest for originality, the choice of a name carries a weight of significance, setting the stage for an individual's identity from birth. Similarly, air pollution is a pressing environmental issue that affects public health and ecosystems, with its own complexities and ramifications.
Yet, amidst the solemnity of these two subjects, a whimsical question emerged: could there be a correlation between the popularity of a particular first name and levels of air pollution? This seemingly incongruous connection piqued our curiosity and led to the investigation that we present in this study.
For decades, the name "Rocky" has been both a source of inspiration and an embodiment of resilience, conjuring images of the determined boxer Rocky Balboa and the majestic Rocky Mountains. Meanwhile, Provo, Utah, with its charming landscapes, has been a picturesque backdrop for residents and visitors alike. The intertwining of these seemingly disparate elements forms the backdrop for our investigation.
Our study aims to uncover patterns in the data of the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, shedding light on the potential link between the frequency of the name "Rocky" and the level of air pollution in Provo, Utah. The intersection of the playful and the profound, the fanciful and the factual, as we examine this correlation, proves to be an enthralling prospect. While the initial notion may appear lighthearted, our rigorous statistical methods and meticulous data analysis aim to lend gravity to our findings.
With this in mind, we embark on a journey to explore the unexpected relationship between personal nomenclature and environmental factors. Through our scholarly pursuit, we seek to bring clarity to this hazy correlation and, in doing so, contribute a breath of fresh air to the world of name research and environmental science. Thus, we invite readers to join us in unraveling the enigmatic "Rocky Air" and its intriguing implications for the social and environmental landscapes of Provo, Utah.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a notable correlation between the popularity of the first name "Rocky" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah. Over the period from 1980 to 2018, a correlation coefficient of 0.6183992 and an r-squared value of 0.3824176 were obtained, indicating a moderately strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The p-value of less than 0.01 further supports the significance of this correlation.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 provides a visual representation of the observed correlation, demonstrating a clear trend that may surprise even the most skeptical observers. The upward sloping pattern of the data points depicts the curious coupling of "Rocky" names with higher levels of air pollution, offering an intriguing visual insight into this unexpected relationship.
The findings of this study expand our understanding of the intricate interplay between personal names and environmental influences. The remarkable correlation between the popularity of the name "Rocky" and air pollution levels in Provo, Utah prompts further reflection on the underlying factors driving this peculiar association. While the notion of names affecting air quality may seem far-fetched at first glance, our rigorous statistical analysis brings this whimsical connection to the forefront of scholarly discourse.
In conclusion, our investigation into the "Rocky Air" phenomenon presents a compelling case for the unanticipated link between personal nomenclature and environmental conditions. The implications of this study reach beyond the realms of traditional research inquiries, offering a fresh perspective on the intricate tapestry of human identity and environmental phenomena. This research not only adds a breath of fresh air to the field of baby name studies but also invites us to marvel at the curious dance of personal names and atmospheric factors.
These findings urge further exploration into the potential influence of names on environmental dynamics, marking a captivating departure from conventional research inquiries. While the connection between "Rocky" names and air pollution in Provo, Utah may initially appear whimsical, the statistical evidence speaks volumes about the underlying correlation, inviting scholars to dive deeper into the captivating world of unusual name-environment relationships.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In culmination, our study has unearthed a striking link between the prevalence of the first name "Rocky" and air pollution levels in the idyllic locale of Provo, Utah. The correlation coefficient of 0.6183992 and r-squared value of 0.3824176 shine a spotlight on this unanticipated relationship, leaving us breathless at the unexpected intertwining of personal nomenclature and atmospheric conditions.

While the initial inquiry into this peculiar correlation may have been lighthearted, our rigorous analysis has lent gravitas to the whimsical connection between "Rocky" names and air quality. The scatterplot in Figure 1 lays bare this surprising trend, inviting us to marvel at the mysterious dance of nomenclature and environmental factors.

The implications of this investigation transcend the boundaries of traditional research pursuits, injecting a breath of fresh air into the domain of name studies and environmental science. Furthermore, the findings of this study urge further exploration into the potential influence of names on environmental dynamics, challenging us to contemplate the broader impact of personal nomenclature on the world around us.

In light of these revelations, we assert with confidence that no further research is necessary in this area. The results of this study stand as a testament to the enigmatic interplay between human names and atmospheric phenomena, leaving us with a newfound appreciation for the whimsy and wonder that permeate the scientific landscape.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Rocky Air: The Air-ia of Rocky Names and Pollution Levels in Provo, Utah. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Rocky Air Quality Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Rocky Air: The Air-ia of Rocky Names and Pollution Levels in Provo, Utah. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for High Altitude Aerography and Environmental Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Rocky Air: The Air-ia of Rocky Names and Pollution Levels in Provo, Utah with an abstract of The phenomenon of baby names and air pollution may seem unrelated, but our study delves into the surprising connection between the popularity of the first name "Rocky" and air pollution in the scenic town of Provo, Utah. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we employed rigorous statistical methods to explore this whimsical relationship. Our analysis revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6183992 and p < 0.01 for the time period spanning 1980 to 2018. Intriguingly, the hazier the air, the rockier the names, as our findings shed light on this peculiar correlation. This study not only adds a breath of fresh air to the field of baby name research but also offers a breath-taking view of the unexpected interplay between personal nomenclature and environmental factors.

ChatGPT:

"Rocky baby names," "air pollution correlation," "Provo, Utah demographics," "US Social Security Administration data," "Environmental Protection Agency air quality," "baby name popularity," "correlation coefficient analysis," "whimsical relationship study," "personal nomenclature research"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Rocky
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Rocky
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Rocky

Air pollution in Provo, Utah
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Provo-Orem, UT
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Provo, Utah

Correlation r = 0.6183992 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.3824176 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 38.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Provo, Utah) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Rocky) over the 39 years from 1980 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.7E-5. 0.0000272272114284492030000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.62 in 0.0027% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 36,728 random variables You don't actually need 36 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 38 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 38 because we have two variables measured over a period of 39 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.38, 0.78 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018
Popularity of the first name Rocky (Babies born)607601599492431411410316296228235209189203175190142142140131172159148160159180189216197187163186188197211237217227249
Air pollution in Provo, Utah (Bad air quality days)0.8196726.301376.849325.219782.459021.369864.657531.369860.5464482.465751.369860.5479450.2732240000.27322401.643840.8219181.639343.01371.643840.5479453.551911.0958903.01370.5464481.369860.54794500.2732244.38356000.5464480.8219181.91781




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([607,601,599,492,431,411,410,316,296,228,235,209,189,203,175,190,142,142,140,131,172,159,148,160,159,180,189,216,197,187,163,186,188,197,211,237,217,227,249,])
array_2 = np.array([0.819672,6.30137,6.84932,5.21978,2.45902,1.36986,4.65753,1.36986,0.546448,2.46575,1.36986,0.547945,0.273224,0,0,0,0.273224,0,1.64384,0.821918,1.63934,3.0137,1.64384,0.547945,3.55191,1.09589,0,3.0137,0.546448,1.36986,0.547945,0,0.273224,4.38356,0,0,0.546448,0.821918,1.91781,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Rocky"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Provo, Utah"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 2019 · Black Variable ID: 4093 · Red Variable ID: 21099
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0