Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the number of Reynas grew, so did the demand for personalized license plates. This led to a decrease in the overall number of cars on the road in Los Angeles, ultimately improving air quality. It seems like the name Reyna is truly paving the way for smog-free skies!
Model: dalle-3
Prompt: The prompt for DALL-E 3 is "Create a cyber-folk inspired image of a group of people gathered under a large tree in a beautiful Los Angeles park. In the background, the iconic Hollywood sign is visible against a clear blue sky. As the sun sets, the air is crisp and refreshing. Among the group, several children are happily playing, with one of them named Reyna. She is surrounded by friends and joyfully laughing amid the pleasant and good air quality in the city." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Reyna and Good air quality in Los Angeles. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image Data cyber art Charcoal Cyber folk Cyber folk
ChatGPT: Cyber folk
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Reyna and Good air quality in Los Angeles together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a beautiful Los Angeles park, a group of people gathers under the shade of a large tree. In the background, the famous Hollywood sign is visible through the clear blue sky. As the sun sets, the air is crisp and refreshing. Among the group, there are several children happily playing, and one of them is called Reyna. She is surrounded by friends and laughs joyfully, enjoying the pleasant and good air quality in the city.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyber folk ] and depicting this scene: In a beautiful Los Angeles park, a group of people gathers under the shade of a large tree. In the background, the famous Hollywood sign is visible through the clear blue sky. As the sun sets, the air is crisp and refreshing. Among the group, there are several children happily playing, and one of them is called Reyna. She is surrounded by friends and laughs joyfully, enjoying the pleasant and good air quality in the city. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: The prompt for DALL-E 3 is "Create a cyber-folk inspired image of a group of people gathered under a large tree in a beautiful Los Angeles park. In the background, the iconic Hollywood sign is visible against a clear blue sky. As the sun sets, the air is crisp and refreshing. Among the group, several children are happily playing, with one of them named Reyna. She is surrounded by friends and joyfully laughing amid the pleasant and good air quality in the city."
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Reyna caused Air quality in Los Angeles to increase.
AI academic paper
 |
Every Breath You Take: The Surprisingly Breathable Connection between the Popularity of the First Name Reyna and Air Quality in Los Angeles The Journal of Unorthodox Interdisciplinary Research Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reyna and Air quality in Los Angeles. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7977054 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Every Breath You Take: The Surprisingly Breathable Connection between the Popularity of the First Name Reyna and Air Quality in Los Angeles
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the seldom-explored relationship between the frequency of the first name Reyna and air quality in the Los Angeles area. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency spanning the years 1980 to 2022, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to unravel this enigmatic correlation. The findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7977054 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between the rise and fall of the name Reyna and fluctuations in air quality. Our results not only shed light on this unconventional relationship but also underscore the pervasive influence of nomenclature on environmental conditions.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reyna and Air quality in Los Angeles. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Every Breath You Take: The Surprisingly Breathable Connection between the Popularity of the First Name Reyna and Air Quality in Los Angeles
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the seldom-explored relationship between the frequency of the first name Reyna and air quality in the Los Angeles area. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency spanning the years 1980 to 2022, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to unravel this enigmatic correlation. The findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7977054 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between the rise and fall of the name Reyna and fluctuations in air quality. Our results not only shed light on this unconventional relationship but also underscore the pervasive influence of nomenclature on environmental conditions.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between human behavior and environmental conditions has long been a subject of keen interest and investigation. Researchers have diligently probed the impact of factors such as industrial emissions, vehicular traffic, and geographical features on air quality. However, a less conventional variable has emerged as the focus of our inquiry in this study: the popularity of the first name Reyna. While this may initially appear to be an arbitrary and improbable variable, our investigation seeks to elucidate its unforeseen connection to air quality in the urban sprawl of Los Angeles.
As we embark upon this investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the propensity of researchers to delve into uncharted territory, even if it means navigating through unorthodox avenues. Hence, our study adds a touch of novelty to the landscape of environmental research, coupling the gravitas of scientific inquiry with the whimsy of exploring an unexpected thematic link.
Through the lens of statistical analysis, our research endeavors to unravel the inexplicable correlation between the ebb and flow of the name Reyna and the atmospheric nuances of the Los Angeles region. By discerning patterns within datasets from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we seek to shed light on this idiosyncratic association as well as highlight the potential influence of nomenclature on environmental dynamics.
We anticipate that our findings will not only provoke contemplation but also inject a touch of levity into the often austere domain of environmental research. While the implications of our work may not be immediately evident, the quirkiness of the inquiry itself serves as a gentle reminder that scientific exploration need not always adhere to traditional avenues.
In the following sections, we provide an in-depth exploration of our methodological approach, the nuances of our data analysis, and the compelling findings that beckon for further elucidation. It is our hope that this foray into uncharted territory will stimulate curiosity, elicit contemplation, and, perchance, inspire a chuckle or two amidst the rigors of scientific inquiry. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a scholarly journey that promises both intellectual intrigue and the occasional bemused smile.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reyna and Air quality in Los Angeles. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Every Breath You Take: The Surprisingly Breathable Connection between the Popularity of the First Name Reyna and Air Quality in Los Angeles
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the seldom-explored relationship between the frequency of the first name Reyna and air quality in the Los Angeles area. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency spanning the years 1980 to 2022, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to unravel this enigmatic correlation. The findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7977054 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between the rise and fall of the name Reyna and fluctuations in air quality. Our results not only shed light on this unconventional relationship but also underscore the pervasive influence of nomenclature on environmental conditions.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between human behavior and environmental conditions has long been a subject of keen interest and investigation. Researchers have diligently probed the impact of factors such as industrial emissions, vehicular traffic, and geographical features on air quality. However, a less conventional variable has emerged as the focus of our inquiry in this study: the popularity of the first name Reyna. While this may initially appear to be an arbitrary and improbable variable, our investigation seeks to elucidate its unforeseen connection to air quality in the urban sprawl of Los Angeles.
As we embark upon this investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the propensity of researchers to delve into uncharted territory, even if it means navigating through unorthodox avenues. Hence, our study adds a touch of novelty to the landscape of environmental research, coupling the gravitas of scientific inquiry with the whimsy of exploring an unexpected thematic link.
Through the lens of statistical analysis, our research endeavors to unravel the inexplicable correlation between the ebb and flow of the name Reyna and the atmospheric nuances of the Los Angeles region. By discerning patterns within datasets from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we seek to shed light on this idiosyncratic association as well as highlight the potential influence of nomenclature on environmental dynamics.
We anticipate that our findings will not only provoke contemplation but also inject a touch of levity into the often austere domain of environmental research. While the implications of our work may not be immediately evident, the quirkiness of the inquiry itself serves as a gentle reminder that scientific exploration need not always adhere to traditional avenues.
In the following sections, we provide an in-depth exploration of our methodological approach, the nuances of our data analysis, and the compelling findings that beckon for further elucidation. It is our hope that this foray into uncharted territory will stimulate curiosity, elicit contemplation, and, perchance, inspire a chuckle or two amidst the rigors of scientific inquiry. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a scholarly journey that promises both intellectual intrigue and the occasional bemused smile.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between the frequency of given names and environmental conditions has received limited attention in scholarly literature, but the few existing studies have hinted at intriguing connections. Smith and Doe (2010) surveyed the prevalence of various names and observed subtle variations in air quality in metropolitan areas. Similarly, Jones et al. (2015) delved into the statistical association between popular names and atmospheric conditions, albeit in a different geographical context. Meanwhile, in "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum, suggesting the possibility of unforeseen links between nomenclature and environmental factors that merit further exploration.
Turning to the world of non-fiction, works such as "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis of Urban Air Quality" and "The Naming Effect: Unraveling the Psychology of Personal Names" offer broader insights into the intersection of human behavior and environmental phenomena. While ostensibly unrelated to the specific correlation under investigation, these publications underscore the multidimensionality of the subject matter and the potential for unanticipated connections.
On a more speculative note, fictional works like "The Name of the Wind" and "The Air Awakens" evoke thematic elements that, by sheer serendipity, align with the central focus of this inquiry. Though their narratives may not yield empirical evidence, the allure of their titles serves as a subtle reminder of the interplay between naming conventions and atmospheric conditions, if only in the realm of imagination.
Additionally, an exploration of popular culture reveals television shows such as "The Good Place" and "Parks and Recreation," which, while not directly related to the research topic, acquaint the viewer with the idiosyncrasies of human identity and the potential reverberations within their respective environments. This exposure to diverse narratives underscores the richness of contextual influences and provides a nod to the complex interweaving of human existence and ambient surroundings.
In sum, the existing literature, both scholarly and popular, hints at a broader landscape of connections between human naming conventions and environmental dynamics, setting the stage for our investigation into the unexpected bond between the first name Reyna and air quality in Los Angeles.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reyna and Air quality in Los Angeles. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 1980 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Every Breath You Take: The Surprisingly Breathable Connection between the Popularity of the First Name Reyna and Air Quality in Los Angeles
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the seldom-explored relationship between the frequency of the first name Reyna and air quality in the Los Angeles area. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency spanning the years 1980 to 2022, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to unravel this enigmatic correlation. The findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7977054 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between the rise and fall of the name Reyna and fluctuations in air quality. Our results not only shed light on this unconventional relationship but also underscore the pervasive influence of nomenclature on environmental conditions.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The interplay between human behavior and environmental conditions has long been a subject of keen interest and investigation. Researchers have diligently probed the impact of factors such as industrial emissions, vehicular traffic, and geographical features on air quality. However, a less conventional variable has emerged as the focus of our inquiry in this study: the popularity of the first name Reyna. While this may initially appear to be an arbitrary and improbable variable, our investigation seeks to elucidate its unforeseen connection to air quality in the urban sprawl of Los Angeles.
As we embark upon this investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the propensity of researchers to delve into uncharted territory, even if it means navigating through unorthodox avenues. Hence, our study adds a touch of novelty to the landscape of environmental research, coupling the gravitas of scientific inquiry with the whimsy of exploring an unexpected thematic link.
Through the lens of statistical analysis, our research endeavors to unravel the inexplicable correlation between the ebb and flow of the name Reyna and the atmospheric nuances of the Los Angeles region. By discerning patterns within datasets from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we seek to shed light on this idiosyncratic association as well as highlight the potential influence of nomenclature on environmental dynamics.
We anticipate that our findings will not only provoke contemplation but also inject a touch of levity into the often austere domain of environmental research. While the implications of our work may not be immediately evident, the quirkiness of the inquiry itself serves as a gentle reminder that scientific exploration need not always adhere to traditional avenues.
In the following sections, we provide an in-depth exploration of our methodological approach, the nuances of our data analysis, and the compelling findings that beckon for further elucidation. It is our hope that this foray into uncharted territory will stimulate curiosity, elicit contemplation, and, perchance, inspire a chuckle or two amidst the rigors of scientific inquiry. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a scholarly journey that promises both intellectual intrigue and the occasional bemused smile.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The methodology employed in this study was designed to rigorously examine the relationship between the popularity of the first name Reyna and air quality in the Los Angeles area. Data pertaining to the frequency of the name Reyna was sourced from the US Social Security Administration, while air quality indicators were gleaned from the Environmental Protection Agency. The temporal scope of the study encompassed the years 1980 to 2022, thus offering a comprehensive overview of the vicissitudes in both nomenclature and atmospheric conditions over this duration.
The initial phase of this inquiry involved wrangling with the idiosyncrasies of the datasets, akin to untangling a web of alphabetical and algorithmic conundrums. As such, the data curation process necessitated meticulous attention to detail, akin to donning a pair of bespoke statistical spectacles. Through the deft use of digital tools and programming languages, the team harnessed the power of data manipulation techniques to cleanse, harmonize, and harmoniously blend the disparate strands of information.
Subsequently, statistical analyses were conducted with the precision of a seasoned sommelier savoring the nuances of a complex vintage. Correlation coefficients were computed to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between the frequency of the name Reyna and air quality parameters. Hypothesis testing, bearing the weight of statistical scrutiny, sought to discern the presence of a meaningful association, navigating through the labyrinth of p-values with Sherlockian acumen.
Moreover, measures were undertaken to control for potential confounding variables, ensuring that the observed relationship between the eponymous nomenclature and atmospheric conditions retained its clarity amidst the cacophony of covariates. The process of variable selection resembled a delicate dance, orchestrating a symphony of predictors to mitigate the risk of spurious associations akin to a maestro leading a concert of causality.
Additionally, exploratory data visualization techniques were employed to encapsulate the evocative dance between the undulating curves of name frequency and the undulating waves of pollutant levels, akin to painting a picture with pixels and plot points. These visual representations served as illustrative vignettes, elucidating the patterns and trajectories inherent in this unorthodox liaison.
Lastly, as we traversed the terrain of this analysis, cautionary measures were implemented with the sagacity of seasoned explorers. The potential for Type I errors lurked like a mischievous imp, necessitating the fortification of our statistical ramparts through judicious application of significance thresholds and effect size considerations.
Thus, the methodology undertaken in this study not only navigated the uncharted waters of nomenclatural influence on environmental dynamics but also embraced the art of scientific inquiry with a touch of whimsy and mirth.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reyna and Air quality in Los Angeles. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Environmental Protection Agency .
For the time period 1980 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7977054, r-squared of 0.6363339, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Every Breath You Take: The Surprisingly Breathable Connection between the Popularity of the First Name Reyna and Air Quality in Los Angeles
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the seldom-explored relationship between the frequency of the first name Reyna and air quality in the Los Angeles area. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency spanning the years 1980 to 2022, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to unravel this enigmatic correlation. The findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7977054 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between the rise and fall of the name Reyna and fluctuations in air quality. Our results not only shed light on this unconventional relationship but also underscore the pervasive influence of nomenclature on environmental conditions.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The interplay between human behavior and environmental conditions has long been a subject of keen interest and investigation. Researchers have diligently probed the impact of factors such as industrial emissions, vehicular traffic, and geographical features on air quality. However, a less conventional variable has emerged as the focus of our inquiry in this study: the popularity of the first name Reyna. While this may initially appear to be an arbitrary and improbable variable, our investigation seeks to elucidate its unforeseen connection to air quality in the urban sprawl of Los Angeles.
As we embark upon this investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the propensity of researchers to delve into uncharted territory, even if it means navigating through unorthodox avenues. Hence, our study adds a touch of novelty to the landscape of environmental research, coupling the gravitas of scientific inquiry with the whimsy of exploring an unexpected thematic link.
Through the lens of statistical analysis, our research endeavors to unravel the inexplicable correlation between the ebb and flow of the name Reyna and the atmospheric nuances of the Los Angeles region. By discerning patterns within datasets from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we seek to shed light on this idiosyncratic association as well as highlight the potential influence of nomenclature on environmental dynamics.
We anticipate that our findings will not only provoke contemplation but also inject a touch of levity into the often austere domain of environmental research. While the implications of our work may not be immediately evident, the quirkiness of the inquiry itself serves as a gentle reminder that scientific exploration need not always adhere to traditional avenues.
In the following sections, we provide an in-depth exploration of our methodological approach, the nuances of our data analysis, and the compelling findings that beckon for further elucidation. It is our hope that this foray into uncharted territory will stimulate curiosity, elicit contemplation, and, perchance, inspire a chuckle or two amidst the rigors of scientific inquiry. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a scholarly journey that promises both intellectual intrigue and the occasional bemused smile.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a notable correlation between the frequency of the first name Reyna and the air quality in the Los Angeles area from 1980 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.7977054 indicated a strong positive relationship between the variations in the popularity of the name Reyna and the fluctuations in air quality. This finding has sparked both astonishment and curiosity within the research community, prompting a closer examination of the underlying mechanisms at play.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6363339 suggests that approximately 63.6% of the variability in air quality can be explained by the changes in the popularity of the name Reyna. This substantial proportion underscores the robustness of the association and hints at the potential explanatory power of this peculiar variable.
Notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates a high level of statistical significance, corroborating the validity of the observed relationship. It is important to note that this level of significance underscores the unlikelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by random chance alone, bolstering the credibility of the findings.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the compelling correlation between the variables, with the data points forming a discernible pattern that aligns with the calculated correlation coefficient. The stark coherence between the two sets of data points serves as a striking visual representation of this unexpected connection, inviting further contemplation and analysis.
This unusual linkage between the popularity of the first name Reyna and air quality in Los Angeles has opened a Pandora's box of questions and speculations, beckoning researchers to delve deeper into the intricate interplay between nomenclature and environmental phenomena. While the ramifications of this correlation may initially seem perplexing, they undeniably underscore the fascinating and multifaceted nature of scientific inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reyna and Air quality in Los Angeles. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Every Breath You Take: The Surprisingly Breathable Connection between the Popularity of the First Name Reyna and Air Quality in Los Angeles
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the seldom-explored relationship between the frequency of the first name Reyna and air quality in the Los Angeles area. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency spanning the years 1980 to 2022, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to unravel this enigmatic correlation. The findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7977054 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between the rise and fall of the name Reyna and fluctuations in air quality. Our results not only shed light on this unconventional relationship but also underscore the pervasive influence of nomenclature on environmental conditions.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between the frequency of given names and environmental conditions has received limited attention in scholarly literature, but the few existing studies have hinted at intriguing connections. Smith and Doe (2010) surveyed the prevalence of various names and observed subtle variations in air quality in metropolitan areas. Similarly, Jones et al. (2015) delved into the statistical association between popular names and atmospheric conditions, albeit in a different geographical context. Meanwhile, in "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum, suggesting the possibility of unforeseen links between nomenclature and environmental factors that merit further exploration.
Turning to the world of non-fiction, works such as "The Air We Breathe: A Comprehensive Analysis of Urban Air Quality" and "The Naming Effect: Unraveling the Psychology of Personal Names" offer broader insights into the intersection of human behavior and environmental phenomena. While ostensibly unrelated to the specific correlation under investigation, these publications underscore the multidimensionality of the subject matter and the potential for unanticipated connections.
On a more speculative note, fictional works like "The Name of the Wind" and "The Air Awakens" evoke thematic elements that, by sheer serendipity, align with the central focus of this inquiry. Though their narratives may not yield empirical evidence, the allure of their titles serves as a subtle reminder of the interplay between naming conventions and atmospheric conditions, if only in the realm of imagination.
Additionally, an exploration of popular culture reveals television shows such as "The Good Place" and "Parks and Recreation," which, while not directly related to the research topic, acquaint the viewer with the idiosyncrasies of human identity and the potential reverberations within their respective environments. This exposure to diverse narratives underscores the richness of contextual influences and provides a nod to the complex interweaving of human existence and ambient surroundings.
In sum, the existing literature, both scholarly and popular, hints at a broader landscape of connections between human naming conventions and environmental dynamics, setting the stage for our investigation into the unexpected bond between the first name Reyna and air quality in Los Angeles.
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a notable correlation between the frequency of the first name Reyna and the air quality in the Los Angeles area from 1980 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.7977054 indicated a strong positive relationship between the variations in the popularity of the name Reyna and the fluctuations in air quality. This finding has sparked both astonishment and curiosity within the research community, prompting a closer examination of the underlying mechanisms at play.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6363339 suggests that approximately 63.6% of the variability in air quality can be explained by the changes in the popularity of the name Reyna. This substantial proportion underscores the robustness of the association and hints at the potential explanatory power of this peculiar variable.
Notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates a high level of statistical significance, corroborating the validity of the observed relationship. It is important to note that this level of significance underscores the unlikelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by random chance alone, bolstering the credibility of the findings.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the compelling correlation between the variables, with the data points forming a discernible pattern that aligns with the calculated correlation coefficient. The stark coherence between the two sets of data points serves as a striking visual representation of this unexpected connection, inviting further contemplation and analysis.
This unusual linkage between the popularity of the first name Reyna and air quality in Los Angeles has opened a Pandora's box of questions and speculations, beckoning researchers to delve deeper into the intricate interplay between nomenclature and environmental phenomena. While the ramifications of this correlation may initially seem perplexing, they undeniably underscore the fascinating and multifaceted nature of scientific inquiry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of the current study lend robust support to the sporadically cultivated body of literature investigating the interface between human nomenclature and ecological elements. The striking correlation coefficient and high level of statistical significance fortify the argument for a substantive association between the popularity of the first name Reyna and air quality in Los Angeles. These results echo the whispers of Smith and Doe (2010) and the musings of Jones et al. (2015) who, amidst the scientific community's raised eyebrows, surreptitiously hinted at the possibility of such an uncanny link.
The substantial r-squared value implicates the frequency of the name Reyna in accounting for over 63.6% of the variability in air quality, underscoring the influential role of this seemingly inconspicuous variable. This revelation prompts a reevaluation of the potential nuances and ramifications of nomenclatural dynamics within environmental contexts, urging future research to consider the far-reaching implications of personal nomenclature on atmospheric conditions.
The visually compelling scatterplot, akin to a breathtaking work of visual art, substantiates the emergent relationship between the name Reyna and air quality, resembling a surrealist masterpiece with its resolute depiction of this unexpected correlation. The vivid representation of this striking bond beckons contemplation and invites further investigation into the intricate interplay between the ebb and flow of personal monikers and the delicate dance of atmospheric constituents.
While this unanticipated association may seem as peculiar as a platypus in a petting zoo, it undeniably demonstrates the rich tapestry of scientific inquiry, with its capacity to unearth remarkable connections and challenge conventional wisdom. This revelatory exploration highlights the uncharted territories ripe for scholarly pursuit and reinforces the captivating complexity of the interconnections that underpin our world, reminding us to remain open-minded in the pursuit of knowledge.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Reyna and Air quality in Los Angeles. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Every Breath You Take: The Surprisingly Breathable Connection between the Popularity of the First Name Reyna and Air Quality in Los Angeles
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the seldom-explored relationship between the frequency of the first name Reyna and air quality in the Los Angeles area. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency spanning the years 1980 to 2022, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to unravel this enigmatic correlation. The findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7977054 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between the rise and fall of the name Reyna and fluctuations in air quality. Our results not only shed light on this unconventional relationship but also underscore the pervasive influence of nomenclature on environmental conditions.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The interplay between human behavior and environmental conditions has long been a subject of keen interest and investigation. Researchers have diligently probed the impact of factors such as industrial emissions, vehicular traffic, and geographical features on air quality. However, a less conventional variable has emerged as the focus of our inquiry in this study: the popularity of the first name Reyna. While this may initially appear to be an arbitrary and improbable variable, our investigation seeks to elucidate its unforeseen connection to air quality in the urban sprawl of Los Angeles.
As we embark upon this investigation, it is crucial to acknowledge the propensity of researchers to delve into uncharted territory, even if it means navigating through unorthodox avenues. Hence, our study adds a touch of novelty to the landscape of environmental research, coupling the gravitas of scientific inquiry with the whimsy of exploring an unexpected thematic link.
Through the lens of statistical analysis, our research endeavors to unravel the inexplicable correlation between the ebb and flow of the name Reyna and the atmospheric nuances of the Los Angeles region. By discerning patterns within datasets from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency, we seek to shed light on this idiosyncratic association as well as highlight the potential influence of nomenclature on environmental dynamics.
We anticipate that our findings will not only provoke contemplation but also inject a touch of levity into the often austere domain of environmental research. While the implications of our work may not be immediately evident, the quirkiness of the inquiry itself serves as a gentle reminder that scientific exploration need not always adhere to traditional avenues.
In the following sections, we provide an in-depth exploration of our methodological approach, the nuances of our data analysis, and the compelling findings that beckon for further elucidation. It is our hope that this foray into uncharted territory will stimulate curiosity, elicit contemplation, and, perchance, inspire a chuckle or two amidst the rigors of scientific inquiry. So, fasten your seatbelts and prepare for a scholarly journey that promises both intellectual intrigue and the occasional bemused smile.
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a notable correlation between the frequency of the first name Reyna and the air quality in the Los Angeles area from 1980 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.7977054 indicated a strong positive relationship between the variations in the popularity of the name Reyna and the fluctuations in air quality. This finding has sparked both astonishment and curiosity within the research community, prompting a closer examination of the underlying mechanisms at play.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.6363339 suggests that approximately 63.6% of the variability in air quality can be explained by the changes in the popularity of the name Reyna. This substantial proportion underscores the robustness of the association and hints at the potential explanatory power of this peculiar variable.
Notably, the p-value of less than 0.01 indicates a high level of statistical significance, corroborating the validity of the observed relationship. It is important to note that this level of significance underscores the unlikelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by random chance alone, bolstering the credibility of the findings.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the compelling correlation between the variables, with the data points forming a discernible pattern that aligns with the calculated correlation coefficient. The stark coherence between the two sets of data points serves as a striking visual representation of this unexpected connection, inviting further contemplation and analysis.
This unusual linkage between the popularity of the first name Reyna and air quality in Los Angeles has opened a Pandora's box of questions and speculations, beckoning researchers to delve deeper into the intricate interplay between nomenclature and environmental phenomena. While the ramifications of this correlation may initially seem perplexing, they undeniably underscore the fascinating and multifaceted nature of scientific inquiry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our investigation into the relationship between the prevalence of the first name Reyna and air quality in Los Angeles has yielded remarkably compelling findings. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.7977054 and the statistically significant p-value underscore the robustness of this unexpected association, indicating that approximately 63.6% of the variability in air quality can be explained by variations in the popularity of the name Reyna. This unanticipated connection has left researchers simultaneously scratching their heads and marveling at the whims of statistical fate.
The scatterplot depicting this correlation (Fig. 1) serves as a visual testament to the inexplicable alignment of these seemingly disparate variables, prompting a mixture of incredulity and wry amusement within the scientific community. The unlikelihood of such a strong correlation occurring by random chance alone serves as a gentle reminder that, in the realm of empirical inquiry, truth can indeed be stranger than fiction.
While our analysis has shed light on this idiosyncratic association, it also beckons the question: what unseen forces might be at play, guiding the ebb and flow of both the name Reyna and the atmospheric quality of Los Angeles? The enigma of this relationship serves as a profound catalyst for continued contemplation, invoking the spirit of curiosity and the occasional chuckle amidst the rigors of empirical exploration.
Ultimately, the unexpected linkage between nomenclature and environmental conditions reinforces the notion that scientific inquiry can be as capricious as it is calculated. Our foray into this uncharted terrain has not only sparked intellectual intrigue but also surreptitiously injected a moment of levity into the often staid landscape of environmental research.
As such, we assert with confidence that no further research into this perplexing correlation is needed. After all, some mysteries are best left to the whims of statistical serendipity.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Every Breath You Take: The Surprisingly Breathable Connection between the Popularity of the First Name Reyna and Air Quality in Los Angeles. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Unorthodox Interdisciplinary Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Every Breath You Take: The Surprisingly Breathable Connection between the Popularity of the First Name Reyna and Air Quality in Los Angeles. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Quirky Name-Research and Environmental Investigation
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Every Breath You Take: The Surprisingly Breathable Connection between the Popularity of the First Name Reyna and Air Quality in Los Angeles with an abstract of This study investigates the seldom-explored relationship between the frequency of the first name Reyna and air quality in the Los Angeles area. Using data from the US Social Security Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency spanning the years 1980 to 2022, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to unravel this enigmatic correlation. The findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7977054 and p < 0.01, indicating a robust association between the rise and fall of the name Reyna and fluctuations in air quality. Our results not only shed light on this unconventional relationship but also underscore the pervasive influence of nomenclature on environmental conditions.
ChatGPT:
frequency of first name Reyna, air quality Los Angeles, Social Security Administration data, Environmental Protection Agency data, correlation between name Reyna and air quality, statistical analysis, Los Angeles air quality fluctuations, influence of nomenclature on environmental conditions
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Popularity of the first name ReynaDetailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Reyna
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Reyna
Air quality in Los Angeles
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with good air quality in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air quality in Los Angeles
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.6363339 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 63.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air quality in Los Angeles) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Reyna) over the 43 years from 1980 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.5E-10. 0.0000000001513087838029226800
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 1.5E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 6,609,001,638 random variables You don't actually need 6 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 42 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 42 because we have two variables measured over a period of 43 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.65, 0.89 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
| 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | 1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
| Popularity of the first name Reyna (Babies born) | 171 | 149 | 156 | 158 | 195 | 195 | 169 | 215 | 202 | 199 | 288 | 263 | 284 | 306 | 355 | 403 | 391 | 413 | 393 | 413 | 444 | 441 | 446 | 492 | 433 | 474 | 485 | 503 | 448 | 414 | 356 | 380 | 383 | 376 | 391 | 402 | 440 | 456 | 494 | 493 | 492 | 520 | 514 |
| Air quality in Los Angeles (Good air quality) | 1.63934 | 1.09589 | 1.91781 | 3.0137 | 1.0929 | 2.73973 | 1.91781 | 1.36986 | 2.45902 | 2.46575 | 3.83562 | 4.10959 | 5.7377 | 7.94521 | 6.0274 | 12.0548 | 11.2022 | 9.0411 | 14.5205 | 4.65753 | 7.37705 | 5.20548 | 9.31507 | 8.49315 | 5.7377 | 15.0685 | 15.6164 | 11.5068 | 6.8306 | 9.0411 | 8.76712 | 3.56164 | 8.74317 | 6.0274 | 6.30137 | 6.30137 | 8.74317 | 10.411 | 9.58904 | 18.0822 | 16.3934 | 10.6849 | 10.9589 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([171,149,156,158,195,195,169,215,202,199,288,263,284,306,355,403,391,413,393,413,444,441,446,492,433,474,485,503,448,414,356,380,383,376,391,402,440,456,494,493,492,520,514,])
array_2 = np.array([1.63934,1.09589,1.91781,3.0137,1.0929,2.73973,1.91781,1.36986,2.45902,2.46575,3.83562,4.10959,5.7377,7.94521,6.0274,12.0548,11.2022,9.0411,14.5205,4.65753,7.37705,5.20548,9.31507,8.49315,5.7377,15.0685,15.6164,11.5068,6.8306,9.0411,8.76712,3.56164,8.74317,6.0274,6.30137,6.30137,8.74317,10.411,9.58904,18.0822,16.3934,10.6849,10.9589,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Reyna"
array_2_name = "Air quality in Los Angeles"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Popularity of the first name Reyna
- Line chart for only Air quality in Los Angeles
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Every Breath You Take: The Surprisingly Breathable Connection between the Popularity of the First Name Reyna and Air Quality in Los Angeles
You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!
Correlation ID: 1976 · Black Variable ID: 3060 · Red Variable ID: 20842
