Report an error
Air quality in Los Angeles correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Total likes of Mark Rober YouTube videos | r=0.95 | 13yrs | No |
Total likes of MrBeast's YouTube videos | r=0.94 | 12yrs | No |
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Engineering technologies | r=0.9 | 10yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Music and dance | r=0.89 | 11yrs | No |
Patents granted to Amazon | r=0.86 | 9yrs | No |
Total likes of Steve Mould's YouTube videos | r=0.85 | 15yrs | No |
Patents granted to Mitsubishi | r=0.83 | 12yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Reyna | r=0.8 | 43yrs | Yes! |
Electricity generation in Austria | r=0.75 | 42yrs | No |
Gasoline pumped in South Korea | r=0.74 | 43yrs | No |
Ulta Beauty's stock price (ULTA) | r=0.73 | 16yrs | No |
Total comments on Steve Mould's YouTube videos | r=0.72 | 15yrs | No |
Average milk produced per cow in the US | r=0.67 | 43yrs | No |
USA Population | r=0.65 | 43yrs | No |
The number of movies Nicolas Cage appeared in | r=0.62 | 44yrs | No |
Air quality in Los Angeles also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)