about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,952 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Master's degrees awarded in literature and the second variable is Burglary rates in the US.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters decreased, there was a corresponding decline in the production of overly complex and convoluted academic papers. This reduction in impenetrable jargon and labyrinthine prose perplexed potential burglars, who found it much easier to simply get a regular job than to decipher the verbose writings. After all, why break into a house when you can't even break down a dense paragraph?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Whimsical illustration ] In a library filled with warm, golden light, a stack of enchantingly bound books labeled "English Literature" rests on an ornate wooden table, accompanied by a prestigious diploma adorned with "Master's Degree" in elegant script. Radiating an air of tranquility, the scene is magically captured with swirls of sparkling dust dancing in the air. Suddenly, a shadowy figure with a mysterious mask and a crowbar emerges, casting an ominous silhouette amidst the serene surroundings, creating a stark contrast of light and darkness. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and Burglary rates. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A Discovery magazine cover image Cyber folk Whimsical illustration Minimalism Low poly
ChatGPT: Whimsical illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and Burglary rates together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a peaceful library, a stack of beautifully bound books labeled "English Literature" sits alongside a diploma with "Master's Degree" written in elegant script. Suddenly, a shadowy figure with a mask and a crowbar approaches, casting a sinister presence in the otherwise serene space.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Whimsical illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a peaceful library, a stack of beautifully bound books labeled "English Literature" sits alongside a diploma with "Master's Degree" written in elegant script. Suddenly, a shadowy figure with a mask and a crowbar approaches, casting a sinister presence in the otherwise serene space. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Whimsical illustration ] In a library filled with warm, golden light, a stack of enchantingly bound books labeled "English Literature" rests on an ornate wooden table, accompanied by a prestigious diploma adorned with "Master's Degree" in elegant script. Radiating an air of tranquility, the scene is magically captured with swirls of sparkling dust dancing in the air. Suddenly, a shadowy figure with a mysterious mask and a crowbar emerges, casting an ominous silhouette amidst the serene surroundings, creating a stark contrast of light and darkness.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters caused Burglary rates to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Turning Over a New Leaf: The Prose and Cons of Master's Degrees in English Language and Literature on Burglary Rates

The Journal of Irreverent Interdisciplinary Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and Burglary rates. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9752797 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Turning Over a New Leaf: The Prose and Cons of Master's Degrees in English Language and Literature on Burglary Rates

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates in the United States from 2012 to 2021. By utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.9752797 was discovered, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected finding suggests a striking link between the pursuit of academic excellence in English language and literature and the inclination towards illicit entries. The implications of this study prompt a closer examination of the potential influence of advanced literary knowledge on criminal behavior, offering a fresh perspective on the role of education in society.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and Burglary rates. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Turning Over a New Leaf: The Prose and Cons of Master's Degrees in English Language and Literature on Burglary Rates

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates in the United States from 2012 to 2021. By utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.9752797 was discovered, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected finding suggests a striking link between the pursuit of academic excellence in English language and literature and the inclination towards illicit entries. The implications of this study prompt a closer examination of the potential influence of advanced literary knowledge on criminal behavior, offering a fresh perspective on the role of education in society.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The pursuit of knowledge and the study of literature have long been revered as noble and enriching pursuits, celebrated for their ability to broaden the mind and cultivate a deeper understanding of the human experience. However, amidst the hallowed halls of academia, a peculiar relationship has emerged, one that connects the conferral of Master's degrees in English language and literature/letters to the rather unexpected realm of burglary rates. This odd coupling of seemingly disparate realms beckons the curious mind to delve deeper into the labyrinthine corridors of statistical analysis, in search of the elusive threads that bind together the pursuit of literary enlightenment and the perpetration of clandestine acts.

As the saying goes, "the pen is mightier than the sword," but could it also be mightier than the crowbar? Or perhaps, in the case of our findings, the keyboard might hold more sway than the lock pick. Indeed, the unexpected correlation uncovered between Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates has raised eyebrows and prompted a reevaluation of the potential influence of advanced literary knowledge on criminal behavior. While this revelation may come as a surprise to many, it serves as a potent reminder of the intricate and often perplexing interplay between education, intellectual pursuits, and societal phenomena.

The aim of this study is not to cast aspersions upon the pursuit of higher education in the field of English language and literature, nor to paint all literary scholars with the brush of thievery. Rather, it is an earnest endeavor to unravel the enigma of this association, to shed light on a curious correlation that challenges conventional wisdom and invites a more nuanced understanding of the impact of education on human behavior. In doing so, we hope to turn over a new leaf in the scholarly discourse and provoke a robust dialogue on the unexpected and, dare we say, novel connections that can be unearthed through the lens of empirical inquiry.

Join us as we embark on a journey through the annals of educational attainment and criminal activity, and let the prose and cons of Master's degrees in English language and literature/letters reveal themselves in a manner that is both illuminating and, quite possibly, a tad bit larcenous.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and Burglary rates. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Turning Over a New Leaf: The Prose and Cons of Master's Degrees in English Language and Literature on Burglary Rates

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates in the United States from 2012 to 2021. By utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.9752797 was discovered, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected finding suggests a striking link between the pursuit of academic excellence in English language and literature and the inclination towards illicit entries. The implications of this study prompt a closer examination of the potential influence of advanced literary knowledge on criminal behavior, offering a fresh perspective on the role of education in society.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge and the study of literature have long been revered as noble and enriching pursuits, celebrated for their ability to broaden the mind and cultivate a deeper understanding of the human experience. However, amidst the hallowed halls of academia, a peculiar relationship has emerged, one that connects the conferral of Master's degrees in English language and literature/letters to the rather unexpected realm of burglary rates. This odd coupling of seemingly disparate realms beckons the curious mind to delve deeper into the labyrinthine corridors of statistical analysis, in search of the elusive threads that bind together the pursuit of literary enlightenment and the perpetration of clandestine acts.
As the saying goes, "the pen is mightier than the sword," but could it also be mightier than the crowbar? Or perhaps, in the case of our findings, the keyboard might hold more sway than the lock pick. Indeed, the unexpected correlation uncovered between Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates has raised eyebrows and prompted a reevaluation of the potential influence of advanced literary knowledge on criminal behavior. While this revelation may come as a surprise to many, it serves as a potent reminder of the intricate and often perplexing interplay between education, intellectual pursuits, and societal phenomena.
The aim of this study is not to cast aspersions upon the pursuit of higher education in the field of English language and literature, nor to paint all literary scholars with the brush of thievery. Rather, it is an earnest endeavor to unravel the enigma of this association, to shed light on a curious correlation that challenges conventional wisdom and invites a more nuanced understanding of the impact of education on human behavior. In doing so, we hope to turn over a new leaf in the scholarly discourse and provoke a robust dialogue on the unexpected and, dare we say, novel connections that can be unearthed through the lens of empirical inquiry.
Join us as we embark on a journey through the annals of educational attainment and criminal activity, and let the prose and cons of Master's degrees in English language and literature/letters reveal themselves in a manner that is both illuminating and, quite possibly, a tad bit larcenous.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith (2015) examines the relationship between advanced education in the humanities and the propensity for criminal behavior, shedding light on the potential repercussions of pursuing expertise in language and literature. Doe (2018), in a similar vein, delves into the nuances of intellectual pursuits and their unanticipated intersection with illicit activities. Additionally, Jones (2019) contributes to this body of research by documenting the impact of academic achievements in literary fields on societal trends, including those of a more, shall we say, clandestine nature.

In "Book," the authors find that individuals with a penchant for parsing prose may be predisposed to perpetrating peculiar pilfering escapades. This revelation prompts a reconsideration of the phrase "the pen is mightier than the sword" to include a reference to the lockpick, underscoring the oft-unacknowledged versatility of literary expertise in contemporary society.

Continuing along this literary trail, Durden (2012) elucidates the potential allure of literary knowledge in the commission of covert activities, offering a profound yet oddly lighthearted exploration of the gray areas between academic pursuits and the temptations of, shall we say, unconventional appropriation.

Turning to non-fiction works, "The Art of the Heist" and "The Burglar's Guide to the City" provide intriguing insights into the intersection of literary acumen and the art of, well, liberating certain possessions from their usual owners.

On the fictional side, the works of Arthur Conan Doyle and Agatha Christie illuminate the intricate movements of the mind, albeit in the pursuit of justice rather than, ahem, "alternative redistribution of personal property." Likewise, the adventures of a certain gentleman thief in Maurice Leblanc's "Arsène Lupin, Gentleman Burglar" offer a captivating fictional portrayal of the cunning and erudition that may be associated with, shall we say, nontraditional acquisitions.

Turning to visual media, the dazzling escapades of a high-functioning sociopathic consultant in "Sherlock" and the gripping exploits of a morally ambiguous chemist-cum-criminal in "Breaking Bad" present compelling narratives that blur the boundaries between intellectual prowess and, let us say, less-than-law-abiding activities.

The diverse range of sources traversed in this literature review underscores the complexity and, dare I say, the whimsical nature of the relationship between literary mastery and, well, let's call it innovative wealth procurement. As we journey further into the study of this curious correlation, it becomes increasingly clear that the prose and cons of Master's degrees in English language and literature/letters offer a blend of the unexpected and the unabashedly entertaining, beckoning us to embrace the larcenous undercurrents of academic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and Burglary rates. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Turning Over a New Leaf: The Prose and Cons of Master's Degrees in English Language and Literature on Burglary Rates

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates in the United States from 2012 to 2021. By utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.9752797 was discovered, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected finding suggests a striking link between the pursuit of academic excellence in English language and literature and the inclination towards illicit entries. The implications of this study prompt a closer examination of the potential influence of advanced literary knowledge on criminal behavior, offering a fresh perspective on the role of education in society.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge and the study of literature have long been revered as noble and enriching pursuits, celebrated for their ability to broaden the mind and cultivate a deeper understanding of the human experience. However, amidst the hallowed halls of academia, a peculiar relationship has emerged, one that connects the conferral of Master's degrees in English language and literature/letters to the rather unexpected realm of burglary rates. This odd coupling of seemingly disparate realms beckons the curious mind to delve deeper into the labyrinthine corridors of statistical analysis, in search of the elusive threads that bind together the pursuit of literary enlightenment and the perpetration of clandestine acts.
As the saying goes, "the pen is mightier than the sword," but could it also be mightier than the crowbar? Or perhaps, in the case of our findings, the keyboard might hold more sway than the lock pick. Indeed, the unexpected correlation uncovered between Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates has raised eyebrows and prompted a reevaluation of the potential influence of advanced literary knowledge on criminal behavior. While this revelation may come as a surprise to many, it serves as a potent reminder of the intricate and often perplexing interplay between education, intellectual pursuits, and societal phenomena.
The aim of this study is not to cast aspersions upon the pursuit of higher education in the field of English language and literature, nor to paint all literary scholars with the brush of thievery. Rather, it is an earnest endeavor to unravel the enigma of this association, to shed light on a curious correlation that challenges conventional wisdom and invites a more nuanced understanding of the impact of education on human behavior. In doing so, we hope to turn over a new leaf in the scholarly discourse and provoke a robust dialogue on the unexpected and, dare we say, novel connections that can be unearthed through the lens of empirical inquiry.
Join us as we embark on a journey through the annals of educational attainment and criminal activity, and let the prose and cons of Master's degrees in English language and literature/letters reveal themselves in a manner that is both illuminating and, quite possibly, a tad bit larcenous.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]
The data for this research was collected from the National Center for Education Statistics regarding the number of Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters from 2012 to 2021. This information was obtained through a series of rigorous and undoubtedly thrilling web searches, where the research team skillfully navigated the labyrinthine corridors of the internet, braving pop-up ads and clickbait with steely determination.

The burglary rates for the same time period were sourced from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, utilizing a combination of data extraction techniques that would make even the most elusive cat burglar envious. The raw data was then subjected to extensive cleaning and organization, akin to deciphering an ancient manuscript to unveil its hidden truths.

Once the datasets were scrubbed clean of any discrepancies and inconsistencies, the real fun began. Statistical analysis took center stage, with a generous helping of regression models, correlation coefficients, and p-values. The research team engaged in a series of high-stakes calculations, reminiscent of a daredevil tightrope walker navigating the treacherous chasm of academic inquiry.

The correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates was examined using the robust Pearson correlation coefficient. The resulting coefficient of 0.9752797 stood tall and proud, much like a literary protagonist facing insurmountable odds. Furthermore, the awe-inspiring p-value of less than 0.01 emerged as a beacon of statistical significance in the murky sea of data points, beckoning researchers to sail forth with confidence into uncharted waters of academic discovery.

In order to ensure the integrity and reliability of the findings, a battery of sensitivity analyses and diagnostic tests were employed, akin to running a thorough background check on each and every statistical output. This meticulous process provided reassurance that the relationship uncovered between Master's degrees in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates was not a mere whimsical fancy, but a robust and steadfast connection worthy of scholarly consideration.

Adhering to the highest standards of research ethics and methodological rigor, the study also accounted for potential confounding variables, lest an opportunistic interloper attempt to sully the purity of the findings. The results were then cross-validated through various techniques, ensuring that the correlation observed was not a mirage in the desert of statistical exploration but a veritable oasis of knowledge in the arid landscape of academic inquiry.

In summary, the methodology employed in this research employed a balanced blend of meticulous data collection, dexterous statistical analysis, and unwavering adherence to academic integrity, resulting in a comprehensive and compelling exploration of the intriguing nexus between Master's degrees in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and Burglary rates. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9752797, r-squared of 0.9511705, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Turning Over a New Leaf: The Prose and Cons of Master's Degrees in English Language and Literature on Burglary Rates

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates in the United States from 2012 to 2021. By utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.9752797 was discovered, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected finding suggests a striking link between the pursuit of academic excellence in English language and literature and the inclination towards illicit entries. The implications of this study prompt a closer examination of the potential influence of advanced literary knowledge on criminal behavior, offering a fresh perspective on the role of education in society.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The pursuit of knowledge and the study of literature have long been revered as noble and enriching pursuits, celebrated for their ability to broaden the mind and cultivate a deeper understanding of the human experience. However, amidst the hallowed halls of academia, a peculiar relationship has emerged, one that connects the conferral of Master's degrees in English language and literature/letters to the rather unexpected realm of burglary rates. This odd coupling of seemingly disparate realms beckons the curious mind to delve deeper into the labyrinthine corridors of statistical analysis, in search of the elusive threads that bind together the pursuit of literary enlightenment and the perpetration of clandestine acts.
As the saying goes, "the pen is mightier than the sword," but could it also be mightier than the crowbar? Or perhaps, in the case of our findings, the keyboard might hold more sway than the lock pick. Indeed, the unexpected correlation uncovered between Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates has raised eyebrows and prompted a reevaluation of the potential influence of advanced literary knowledge on criminal behavior. While this revelation may come as a surprise to many, it serves as a potent reminder of the intricate and often perplexing interplay between education, intellectual pursuits, and societal phenomena.
The aim of this study is not to cast aspersions upon the pursuit of higher education in the field of English language and literature, nor to paint all literary scholars with the brush of thievery. Rather, it is an earnest endeavor to unravel the enigma of this association, to shed light on a curious correlation that challenges conventional wisdom and invites a more nuanced understanding of the impact of education on human behavior. In doing so, we hope to turn over a new leaf in the scholarly discourse and provoke a robust dialogue on the unexpected and, dare we say, novel connections that can be unearthed through the lens of empirical inquiry.
Join us as we embark on a journey through the annals of educational attainment and criminal activity, and let the prose and cons of Master's degrees in English language and literature/letters reveal themselves in a manner that is both illuminating and, quite possibly, a tad bit larcenous.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis revealed a strikingly strong correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates in the United States from 2012 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9752797 and an r-squared value of 0.9511705 evidenced a robust and significant positive relationship between these ostensibly disparate variables. This unexpected finding instigates a reconsideration of the seemingly innocuous pursuit of advanced study in the realm of English language and literature, revealing the potential entanglement of academic pursuits and illicit activities.

The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 vividly illustrates the compelling association uncovered in this study. Each point on the plot represents a unique year, with the x-axis denoting the number of Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and the y-axis signifying burglary rates. The tight clustering of data points along a steeply ascending trendline underscores the unmistakable correlation between these two variables. It is, indeed, a visual representation that conveys the unexpected intertwining of erudition and wrongful entry.

While the precise mechanisms underlying this correlation remain enigmatic, the robust statistical evidence presented in this study compels a closer examination of the potential influence of advanced literary knowledge on criminal propensities. The implications are thought-provoking, challenging conventional assumptions about the societal impact of academic pursuits and prompting a reevaluation of the multifaceted roles education plays in shaping human behavior.

The unexpected nature of this correlation underscores the complexity of human phenomena and the unforeseen intersections that can emerge from empirical inquiry. As we grapple with the implications of these findings, it becomes apparent that the intellectual landscape is far more labyrinthine and peppered with surprises than previously conceived. This study serves as a call to arms for further exploration and reflection on the unanticipated connections that can be unearthed through the lens of rigorous empirical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and Burglary rates. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Turning Over a New Leaf: The Prose and Cons of Master's Degrees in English Language and Literature on Burglary Rates

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates in the United States from 2012 to 2021. By utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.9752797 was discovered, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected finding suggests a striking link between the pursuit of academic excellence in English language and literature and the inclination towards illicit entries. The implications of this study prompt a closer examination of the potential influence of advanced literary knowledge on criminal behavior, offering a fresh perspective on the role of education in society.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith (2015) examines the relationship between advanced education in the humanities and the propensity for criminal behavior, shedding light on the potential repercussions of pursuing expertise in language and literature. Doe (2018), in a similar vein, delves into the nuances of intellectual pursuits and their unanticipated intersection with illicit activities. Additionally, Jones (2019) contributes to this body of research by documenting the impact of academic achievements in literary fields on societal trends, including those of a more, shall we say, clandestine nature.
In "Book," the authors find that individuals with a penchant for parsing prose may be predisposed to perpetrating peculiar pilfering escapades. This revelation prompts a reconsideration of the phrase "the pen is mightier than the sword" to include a reference to the lockpick, underscoring the oft-unacknowledged versatility of literary expertise in contemporary society.
Continuing along this literary trail, Durden (2012) elucidates the potential allure of literary knowledge in the commission of covert activities, offering a profound yet oddly lighthearted exploration of the gray areas between academic pursuits and the temptations of, shall we say, unconventional appropriation.
Turning to non-fiction works, "The Art of the Heist" and "The Burglar's Guide to the City" provide intriguing insights into the intersection of literary acumen and the art of, well, liberating certain possessions from their usual owners.
On the fictional side, the works of Arthur Conan Doyle and Agatha Christie illuminate the intricate movements of the mind, albeit in the pursuit of justice rather than, ahem, "alternative redistribution of personal property." Likewise, the adventures of a certain gentleman thief in Maurice Leblanc's "Arsène Lupin, Gentleman Burglar" offer a captivating fictional portrayal of the cunning and erudition that may be associated with, shall we say, nontraditional acquisitions.
Turning to visual media, the dazzling escapades of a high-functioning sociopathic consultant in "Sherlock" and the gripping exploits of a morally ambiguous chemist-cum-criminal in "Breaking Bad" present compelling narratives that blur the boundaries between intellectual prowess and, let us say, less-than-law-abiding activities.
The diverse range of sources traversed in this literature review underscores the complexity and, dare I say, the whimsical nature of the relationship between literary mastery and, well, let's call it innovative wealth procurement. As we journey further into the study of this curious correlation, it becomes increasingly clear that the prose and cons of Master's degrees in English language and literature/letters offer a blend of the unexpected and the unabashedly entertaining, beckoning us to embrace the larcenous undercurrents of academic inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a strikingly strong correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates in the United States from 2012 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9752797 and an r-squared value of 0.9511705 evidenced a robust and significant positive relationship between these ostensibly disparate variables. This unexpected finding instigates a reconsideration of the seemingly innocuous pursuit of advanced study in the realm of English language and literature, revealing the potential entanglement of academic pursuits and illicit activities.
The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 vividly illustrates the compelling association uncovered in this study. Each point on the plot represents a unique year, with the x-axis denoting the number of Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and the y-axis signifying burglary rates. The tight clustering of data points along a steeply ascending trendline underscores the unmistakable correlation between these two variables. It is, indeed, a visual representation that conveys the unexpected intertwining of erudition and wrongful entry.
While the precise mechanisms underlying this correlation remain enigmatic, the robust statistical evidence presented in this study compels a closer examination of the potential influence of advanced literary knowledge on criminal propensities. The implications are thought-provoking, challenging conventional assumptions about the societal impact of academic pursuits and prompting a reevaluation of the multifaceted roles education plays in shaping human behavior.
The unexpected nature of this correlation underscores the complexity of human phenomena and the unforeseen intersections that can emerge from empirical inquiry. As we grapple with the implications of these findings, it becomes apparent that the intellectual landscape is far more labyrinthine and peppered with surprises than previously conceived. This study serves as a call to arms for further exploration and reflection on the unanticipated connections that can be unearthed through the lens of rigorous empirical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The curious correlation unearthed in this study beckons us to contemplate the multifaceted relationship between literary erudition and, let's say, unconventional extracurricular pursuits. The results of our investigation not only align with prior research but also shed light on the unexpected intertwining of academic achievements in English language and literature/letters with the proclivity for illicit entries.

Our findings align with Smith's (2015) exploration of the repercussions of advanced education in the humanities and its intersection with criminal behavior. The robust statistical evidence presented in our study supports the premise that individuals with a penchant for parsing prose may indeed be predisposed to perpetrating peculiar pilfering escapades, as humorously envisioned in the literature review. This unexpected correlation between literary mastery and, well, innovative wealth procurement challenges traditional assumptions about the societal impact of academic pursuits.

Furthermore, the striking association between the number of Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates resonates with the work of Doe (2018) and Jones (2019), who delved into the nuances of intellectual pursuits and their unanticipated intersection with illicit activities. It appears that our findings have peeled back the layers of conventional wisdom, revealing the larcenous undercurrents of academic inquiry and prompting a reevaluation of the multifaceted roles education plays in shaping human behavior.

The unexpected nature of this correlation underscores the complexity of human phenomena and the unforeseen intersections that can emerge from empirical inquiry, as playfully highlighted in the literature review. While the precise mechanisms underlying this correlation remain enigmatic, the robust statistical evidence presented in our study compels a closer examination of the potential influence of advanced literary knowledge on criminal propensities. It is, indeed, a visual representation that conveys the unexpected intertwining of erudition and wrongful entry.

In conclusion, our study has introduced a fresh perspective on the role of education in society, with an emphasis on the, let's say, unorthodox propensities associated with academic pursuits in English language and literature. This unexpected correlation underscores the whimsical nature of the relationship between literary mastery and, well, let's call it innovative wealth procurement, challenging conventional assumptions and beckoning us to embrace the unexpected connections that emerge through rigorous empirical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and Burglary rates. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Turning Over a New Leaf: The Prose and Cons of Master's Degrees in English Language and Literature on Burglary Rates

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates in the United States from 2012 to 2021. By utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.9752797 was discovered, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected finding suggests a striking link between the pursuit of academic excellence in English language and literature and the inclination towards illicit entries. The implications of this study prompt a closer examination of the potential influence of advanced literary knowledge on criminal behavior, offering a fresh perspective on the role of education in society.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The pursuit of knowledge and the study of literature have long been revered as noble and enriching pursuits, celebrated for their ability to broaden the mind and cultivate a deeper understanding of the human experience. However, amidst the hallowed halls of academia, a peculiar relationship has emerged, one that connects the conferral of Master's degrees in English language and literature/letters to the rather unexpected realm of burglary rates. This odd coupling of seemingly disparate realms beckons the curious mind to delve deeper into the labyrinthine corridors of statistical analysis, in search of the elusive threads that bind together the pursuit of literary enlightenment and the perpetration of clandestine acts.
As the saying goes, "the pen is mightier than the sword," but could it also be mightier than the crowbar? Or perhaps, in the case of our findings, the keyboard might hold more sway than the lock pick. Indeed, the unexpected correlation uncovered between Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates has raised eyebrows and prompted a reevaluation of the potential influence of advanced literary knowledge on criminal behavior. While this revelation may come as a surprise to many, it serves as a potent reminder of the intricate and often perplexing interplay between education, intellectual pursuits, and societal phenomena.
The aim of this study is not to cast aspersions upon the pursuit of higher education in the field of English language and literature, nor to paint all literary scholars with the brush of thievery. Rather, it is an earnest endeavor to unravel the enigma of this association, to shed light on a curious correlation that challenges conventional wisdom and invites a more nuanced understanding of the impact of education on human behavior. In doing so, we hope to turn over a new leaf in the scholarly discourse and provoke a robust dialogue on the unexpected and, dare we say, novel connections that can be unearthed through the lens of empirical inquiry.
Join us as we embark on a journey through the annals of educational attainment and criminal activity, and let the prose and cons of Master's degrees in English language and literature/letters reveal themselves in a manner that is both illuminating and, quite possibly, a tad bit larcenous.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a strikingly strong correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates in the United States from 2012 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.9752797 and an r-squared value of 0.9511705 evidenced a robust and significant positive relationship between these ostensibly disparate variables. This unexpected finding instigates a reconsideration of the seemingly innocuous pursuit of advanced study in the realm of English language and literature, revealing the potential entanglement of academic pursuits and illicit activities.
The scatterplot depicted in Fig. 1 vividly illustrates the compelling association uncovered in this study. Each point on the plot represents a unique year, with the x-axis denoting the number of Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and the y-axis signifying burglary rates. The tight clustering of data points along a steeply ascending trendline underscores the unmistakable correlation between these two variables. It is, indeed, a visual representation that conveys the unexpected intertwining of erudition and wrongful entry.
While the precise mechanisms underlying this correlation remain enigmatic, the robust statistical evidence presented in this study compels a closer examination of the potential influence of advanced literary knowledge on criminal propensities. The implications are thought-provoking, challenging conventional assumptions about the societal impact of academic pursuits and prompting a reevaluation of the multifaceted roles education plays in shaping human behavior.
The unexpected nature of this correlation underscores the complexity of human phenomena and the unforeseen intersections that can emerge from empirical inquiry. As we grapple with the implications of these findings, it becomes apparent that the intellectual landscape is far more labyrinthine and peppered with surprises than previously conceived. This study serves as a call to arms for further exploration and reflection on the unanticipated connections that can be unearthed through the lens of rigorous empirical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study have brought to light a most intriguing and, dare I say, novel association between the pursuit of advanced knowledge in English language and literature/letters and the rather unexpected realm of burglary rates. The robust statistical evidence of a significant positive correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in this esteemed discipline and the incidence of illicit entries into private abodes underscores the need for a deeper understanding of the potential entanglement of erudition and unlawful activities.

The juxtaposition of academia and criminal behavior may seem as incongruous as a sonnet in a police report, yet the compelling statistical link uncovered in this investigation beckons us to ponder the interplay of intellectual pursuits and deviant deeds. Perhaps, as scholars delve into the annals of Shakespeare and Chaucer, there lurks an unforeseen influence that extends beyond the pages of literature and into the realm of illicit entry.

While one may be tempted to make light of this correlation, dismissing it as mere happenstance, the robustness of the statistical evidence and the visual depiction in Fig. 1 lend credence to the validity of this unexpected connection. This revelation prompts a reexamination of the societal impact of academic pursuits, challenging conventional assumptions and inviting a more nuanced understanding of the complex interplay between education and human behavior.

The implications of these findings are as far-reaching as they are unexpected, invoking a reconsideration of the multifaceted roles education plays in shaping the contours of human actions. This study invites further inquiry into the mechanisms that underpin this perplexing correlation, as well as a deeper reflection on the myriad and often perplexing intersections that emerge from empirical investigation.

In light of these revelations, it is clear that the intellectual landscape is far more intricate and dotted with surprises than previously conceived. However, our findings compel us to maintain a poised, albeit bemused, stance, recognizing that correlations do not imply causation. Nevertheless, the unexpected nature of this association invites a robust dialogue on the myriad connections that can be unearthed through the lens of empirical analysis.

Finally, in our assessment of this unexpected correlation, it is the unequivocal conclusion of this study that no further research is needed in this area. This peculiar entanglement of academic pursuits and illicit entries stands as a testament to the enigmatic and serendipitous nature of empirical inquiry, offering a tableau of unexpected connections that both beguile and challenge our preconceptions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Turning Over a New Leaf: The Prose and Cons of Master's Degrees in English Language and Literature on Burglary Rates. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Irreverent Interdisciplinary Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Turning Over a New Leaf: The Prose and Cons of Master's Degrees in English Language and Literature on Burglary Rates. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Applied Linguistics and Crime Prevention


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Turning Over a New Leaf: The Prose and Cons of Master's Degrees in English Language and Literature on Burglary Rates with an abstract of This paper explores the correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in English language and literature/letters and burglary rates in the United States from 2012 to 2021. By utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, a significant positive correlation coefficient of 0.9752797 was discovered, with a p-value of less than 0.01. This unexpected finding suggests a striking link between the pursuit of academic excellence in English language and literature and the inclination towards illicit entries. The implications of this study prompt a closer examination of the potential influence of advanced literary knowledge on criminal behavior, offering a fresh perspective on the role of education in society.

ChatGPT:

Master's degrees, English language and literature, burglary rates, correlation, academic excellence, criminal behavior, education, influence, advanced literary knowledge, society, National Center for Education Statistics, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, correlation coefficient, p-value, United States, 2012-2021

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Master's degrees awarded in literature
Detailed data title: Master's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions in English language and literature/letters
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Master's degrees awarded in literature

Burglary rates in the US
Detailed data title: The burglary rate per 100,000 residents in United States
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Burglary rates in the US

Correlation r = 0.9752797 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9511705 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 95.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Burglary rates in the US) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Master's degrees awarded in literature) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.6E-6. 0.0000015858061809387546000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 0.00016% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 630,594 random variables You don't actually need 630 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.9, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Master's degrees awarded in literature (Degrees awarded)9938975592948928858182448300821778627850
Burglary rates in the US (Burglary rate)672.2610.5537.2494.7468.9429.7378340.5314.2270.9




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([9938,9755,9294,8928,8581,8244,8300,8217,7862,7850,])
array_2 = np.array([672.2,610.5,537.2,494.7,468.9,429.7,378,340.5,314.2,270.9,])
array_1_name = "Master's degrees awarded in literature"
array_2_name = "Burglary rates in the US"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 1952 · Black Variable ID: 1322 · Red Variable ID: 20084
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0