Report an error
Master's degrees awarded in literature correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Jaden | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jake | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
Burglaries in New Hampshire | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Colorado | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
The number of layout workers, metal and plastic in Ohio | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Bryn | r=0.99 | 10yrs | No |
Burglary rates in the US | r=0.98 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'download firefox' | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Jasmine | r=0.97 | 10yrs | No |
US birth rates of triplets or more | r=0.96 | 10yrs | No |
Cenovus Energy's stock price (CVE) | r=0.96 | 10yrs | Yes! |
Annual Email Spam Rates | r=0.94 | 10yrs | No |
Jet fuel used in Zambia | r=0.93 | 10yrs | No |
Master's degrees awarded in literature also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)