about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,950 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Whitley and the second variable is Points scored by the Buffalo Bills.  The chart goes from 1982 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Every time a baby was named Whitley, a magical aura of good luck enveloped the Buffalo Bills, leading to heightened focus, agility, and scoring abilities on the field. It's like they were receiving a direct infusion of positive energy and unstoppable determination from all the little Whitleys out there. It got to the point where the announcers were considering replacing the phrase "He shoots, he scores!" with "Whitley is in the air, and the Bills are on fire!"

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate a black-and-white newspaper illustration of a crowded football stadium with a jumbotron displaying the name "Whitley" and the Buffalo Bills' increasing points on the scoreboard, as the crowd cheers in excitement. Capture the energy and enthusiasm of the cheering crowd as they celebrate the game. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Whitley and Points scored by the Buffalo Bills. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Vaporwave A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Woodblock painting A black-and-white newspaper illustration
ChatGPT: A black-and-white newspaper illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Whitley and Points scored by the Buffalo Bills together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A crowded football stadium cheers as Whitley, a popular name, is displayed on the jumbotron next to the Buffalo Bills' increasing points on the scoreboard.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A black-and-white newspaper illustration ] and depicting this scene: A crowded football stadium cheers as Whitley, a popular name, is displayed on the jumbotron next to the Buffalo Bills' increasing points on the scoreboard. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate a black-and-white newspaper illustration of a crowded football stadium with a jumbotron displaying the name "Whitley" and the Buffalo Bills' increasing points on the scoreboard, as the crowd cheers in excitement. Capture the energy and enthusiasm of the cheering crowd as they celebrate the game.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Whitley caused Points scored by the Buffalo Bills to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Name Game: Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox

The Journal of Sports Science and Conundrums

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Whitley and Points scored by the Buffalo Bills. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6540958 and p < 0.01 for 1982 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Name Game: Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the peculiar phenomena of the first name "Whitley" in relation to the performance of the Buffalo Bills in the NFL. Through meticulous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com spanning the years 1982 to 2022, we unveil a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6540958 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings suggest an intriguing link between the popularity of the name "Whitley" and the points scored by the Buffalo Bills. Further investigation is warranted to unravel this enigmatic connection, which might just be the touchdown pass of statistical anomalies in the realm of naming and football.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Whitley and Points scored by the Buffalo Bills. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Name Game: Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the peculiar phenomena of the first name "Whitley" in relation to the performance of the Buffalo Bills in the NFL. Through meticulous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com spanning the years 1982 to 2022, we unveil a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6540958 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings suggest an intriguing link between the popularity of the name "Whitley" and the points scored by the Buffalo Bills. Further investigation is warranted to unravel this enigmatic connection, which might just be the touchdown pass of statistical anomalies in the realm of naming and football.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The whimsical world of statistical anomalies and peculiar correlations never ceases to amaze the astute researcher. In this paper, we embark on a delightful journey to untangle the enchanting mystery of the first name "Whitley" and its potential influence on the performance of the venerable Buffalo Bills in the National Football League (NFL). Despite what the skeptics might say, there is amusement and enlightening knowledge to be unveiled at the intersection of nomenclature and athletic prowess.

As we venture into the labyrinth of data, let us first set the stage for our investigation. The nickname "Whitley" emerges from the sprawling tapestry of American first names, bearing a charming and distinct charm that beckons us to explore its hidden depths. Meanwhile, the Buffalo Bills stand as a formidable and time-honored institution in the grand colosseum of professional football, with a legacy as rich and tantalizing as a freshly baked touchdown pie.

Through a fusion of data hailing from the US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com, our quest for revelations leads us to an unexpected aftermath. The correlation coefficient of 0.6540958, coupled with a p-value less than 0.01, hints at a connection more tantalizing than a well-executed flea flicker play. This charming synchronization between the popularity of the name "Whitley" and the points scored by the Buffalo Bills beckons us to plunge deeper into the annals of naming conventions and athletic triumphs. It poses an enigma that tickles the fancy of the inquisitive soul and sets our imaginations on a fascinating voyage into the realm of statistical curiosities.

As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we sincerely hope that readers will join us in this whimsical exploration, where the confluence of names and numbers may yet uncover a cosmic conundrum that is both profound and jocular. The "Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox" that we present here might just be the scientific equivalent of a touchdown dance—intriguing, captivating, and guaranteed to leave a lasting impression.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Whitley and Points scored by the Buffalo Bills. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Name Game: Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the peculiar phenomena of the first name "Whitley" in relation to the performance of the Buffalo Bills in the NFL. Through meticulous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com spanning the years 1982 to 2022, we unveil a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6540958 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings suggest an intriguing link between the popularity of the name "Whitley" and the points scored by the Buffalo Bills. Further investigation is warranted to unravel this enigmatic connection, which might just be the touchdown pass of statistical anomalies in the realm of naming and football.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The whimsical world of statistical anomalies and peculiar correlations never ceases to amaze the astute researcher. In this paper, we embark on a delightful journey to untangle the enchanting mystery of the first name "Whitley" and its potential influence on the performance of the venerable Buffalo Bills in the National Football League (NFL). Despite what the skeptics might say, there is amusement and enlightening knowledge to be unveiled at the intersection of nomenclature and athletic prowess.
As we venture into the labyrinth of data, let us first set the stage for our investigation. The nickname "Whitley" emerges from the sprawling tapestry of American first names, bearing a charming and distinct charm that beckons us to explore its hidden depths. Meanwhile, the Buffalo Bills stand as a formidable and time-honored institution in the grand colosseum of professional football, with a legacy as rich and tantalizing as a freshly baked touchdown pie.
Through a fusion of data hailing from the US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com, our quest for revelations leads us to an unexpected aftermath. The correlation coefficient of 0.6540958, coupled with a p-value less than 0.01, hints at a connection more tantalizing than a well-executed flea flicker play. This charming synchronization between the popularity of the name "Whitley" and the points scored by the Buffalo Bills beckons us to plunge deeper into the annals of naming conventions and athletic triumphs. It poses an enigma that tickles the fancy of the inquisitive soul and sets our imaginations on a fascinating voyage into the realm of statistical curiosities.
As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we sincerely hope that readers will join us in this whimsical exploration, where the confluence of names and numbers may yet uncover a cosmic conundrum that is both profound and jocular. The "Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox" that we present here might just be the scientific equivalent of a touchdown dance—intriguing, captivating, and guaranteed to leave a lasting impression.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature surrounding the intriguing relationship between the name "Whitley" and the performance of the Buffalo Bills is a fascinating blend of statistical analysis and whimsical curiosity. Smith et al. (2010) conducted a comprehensive study delving into the societal impact of first names, while Doe and Jones (2015) explored the psychological implications of name popularity. Both studies provide a valuable foundation for understanding the multifaceted nature of names and their potential influences.

In "The Power of Names," Smith et al. (2010) examine the cultural significance of first names and their societal implications. The authors delve into the complex interplay between nomenclature and human perception, shedding light on the potential psychological and social effects of name popularity. The study serves as a thought-provoking backdrop for our investigation into the enigmatic allure of the name "Whitley" and its unlikely correlation to football performance.

Furthermore, in "The Psychology of Names," Doe and Jones (2015) offer a nuanced exploration of the psychological underpinnings of name popularity. Their research delves into the subconscious associations and perceptions tied to specific names, uncovering intriguing insights into the potential impact of nomenclature on individual behaviors and societal dynamics. Such psychological nuances may underpin the curious connection between the name "Whitley" and the Buffalo Bills' scoring prowess, warranting deeper exploration.

Diverging from the realm of non-fiction, several fictional works offer whimsical perspectives on the idiosyncrasies of names and their potential influences. "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco, though not directly related to naming conventions in football, provides a fascinating exploration of semiotics and the significance of language—a theme that resonates with our investigation into the whimsical world of names and football performance.

Similarly, the classic novel "Jane Eyre" by Charlotte Brontë, through its titular character, offers a poignant reflection on the significance of individual names and their symbolic implications. While the novel may not directly address football statistics, the themes of identity and influence intertwined with names offer a thought-provoking lens through which to contemplate the unexpected correlation between the name "Whitley" and the Buffalo Bills' scoring prowess.

In exploring the realm of popular culture, television shows such as "The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air" and "A Different World" offer nuanced portrayals of character names and their cultural connotations. The eclectic mix of names in these shows provides a lighthearted yet insightful backdrop for contemplating the peculiar connection between the name "Whitley" and the Buffalo Bills' performance, infusing our scholarly pursuit with a touch of whimsy and mirth.

As we navigate this juxtaposition between earnest academic inquiry and lighthearted musings, the literature review sets the stage for our charming exploration of the "Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox." Embracing the intersection of statistical curiosities and whimsical revelations, we embark on a scholarly escapade that promises to enlighten and entertain in equal measure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Whitley and Points scored by the Buffalo Bills. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com . You used data from 1982 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Name Game: Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the peculiar phenomena of the first name "Whitley" in relation to the performance of the Buffalo Bills in the NFL. Through meticulous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com spanning the years 1982 to 2022, we unveil a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6540958 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings suggest an intriguing link between the popularity of the name "Whitley" and the points scored by the Buffalo Bills. Further investigation is warranted to unravel this enigmatic connection, which might just be the touchdown pass of statistical anomalies in the realm of naming and football.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The whimsical world of statistical anomalies and peculiar correlations never ceases to amaze the astute researcher. In this paper, we embark on a delightful journey to untangle the enchanting mystery of the first name "Whitley" and its potential influence on the performance of the venerable Buffalo Bills in the National Football League (NFL). Despite what the skeptics might say, there is amusement and enlightening knowledge to be unveiled at the intersection of nomenclature and athletic prowess.
As we venture into the labyrinth of data, let us first set the stage for our investigation. The nickname "Whitley" emerges from the sprawling tapestry of American first names, bearing a charming and distinct charm that beckons us to explore its hidden depths. Meanwhile, the Buffalo Bills stand as a formidable and time-honored institution in the grand colosseum of professional football, with a legacy as rich and tantalizing as a freshly baked touchdown pie.
Through a fusion of data hailing from the US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com, our quest for revelations leads us to an unexpected aftermath. The correlation coefficient of 0.6540958, coupled with a p-value less than 0.01, hints at a connection more tantalizing than a well-executed flea flicker play. This charming synchronization between the popularity of the name "Whitley" and the points scored by the Buffalo Bills beckons us to plunge deeper into the annals of naming conventions and athletic triumphs. It poses an enigma that tickles the fancy of the inquisitive soul and sets our imaginations on a fascinating voyage into the realm of statistical curiosities.
As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we sincerely hope that readers will join us in this whimsical exploration, where the confluence of names and numbers may yet uncover a cosmic conundrum that is both profound and jocular. The "Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox" that we present here might just be the scientific equivalent of a touchdown dance—intriguing, captivating, and guaranteed to leave a lasting impression.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To tackle the confounding correlation between the popularity of the moniker "Whitley" and the scoring performance of the Buffalo Bills, a medley of methodological musings and statistical shenanigans was employed. The data, primarily extracted from the US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com, captivated our attention from the years 1982 to 2022.

Firstly, a careful culling of the historical records of the US Social Security Administration was conducted to extract the ebbs and flows of the name "Whitley" as it ebbed and flowed through the tides of popularity. For those familiar with the unpredictable currents of name trends, the annual name data resembled a veritable rollercoaster ride of popularity, with "Whitley" experiencing its own exhilarating loop-de-loops.

Forthwith, the statistical treasure trove of Pro-Football-Reference.com lured us into its domain as we extracted the illustrious performance metrics of the Buffalo Bills. Touchdowns, field goals, extra points—every numeric nugget was meticulously transcribed and scrutinized, akin to a team's playbook under intense review.

Now, the data dance emerges as we carefully align and intertwine the temporal facets of name popularity and gridiron glory. Leveraging the mystical powers of correlation analysis, we embraced the notion that "Whitley" and Buffalo Bills' points scored may not just be the odd couple of nomenclature and sports performance.

Through the lens of rigorous statistical techniques, including regression analysis and exploratory data visualization, we sought to unravel the mystique behind this curious coupling, akin to deciphering a complex route tree in American football.

Furthermore, a multi-levelled, variable-centered approach allowed for the systematic disentangling of potential confounding factors like team performance fluctuations, head coach superstitions, and perhaps even the cosmic influence of celestial bodies on the turf.

In conclusion, our methodology sauntered through the garden of data collection, embraced the art of correlation, and pirouetted around confounding variables with the grace of a nimble wide receiver. The systematic integration of data from disparate sources, coupled with robust statistical analyses resembling a balanced offensive playbook, laid the foundation for our unconventional yet enlightening investigation into the whimsical "Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Whitley and Points scored by the Buffalo Bills. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com .

For the time period 1982 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6540958, r-squared of 0.4278413, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Name Game: Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the peculiar phenomena of the first name "Whitley" in relation to the performance of the Buffalo Bills in the NFL. Through meticulous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com spanning the years 1982 to 2022, we unveil a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6540958 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings suggest an intriguing link between the popularity of the name "Whitley" and the points scored by the Buffalo Bills. Further investigation is warranted to unravel this enigmatic connection, which might just be the touchdown pass of statistical anomalies in the realm of naming and football.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The whimsical world of statistical anomalies and peculiar correlations never ceases to amaze the astute researcher. In this paper, we embark on a delightful journey to untangle the enchanting mystery of the first name "Whitley" and its potential influence on the performance of the venerable Buffalo Bills in the National Football League (NFL). Despite what the skeptics might say, there is amusement and enlightening knowledge to be unveiled at the intersection of nomenclature and athletic prowess.
As we venture into the labyrinth of data, let us first set the stage for our investigation. The nickname "Whitley" emerges from the sprawling tapestry of American first names, bearing a charming and distinct charm that beckons us to explore its hidden depths. Meanwhile, the Buffalo Bills stand as a formidable and time-honored institution in the grand colosseum of professional football, with a legacy as rich and tantalizing as a freshly baked touchdown pie.
Through a fusion of data hailing from the US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com, our quest for revelations leads us to an unexpected aftermath. The correlation coefficient of 0.6540958, coupled with a p-value less than 0.01, hints at a connection more tantalizing than a well-executed flea flicker play. This charming synchronization between the popularity of the name "Whitley" and the points scored by the Buffalo Bills beckons us to plunge deeper into the annals of naming conventions and athletic triumphs. It poses an enigma that tickles the fancy of the inquisitive soul and sets our imaginations on a fascinating voyage into the realm of statistical curiosities.
As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we sincerely hope that readers will join us in this whimsical exploration, where the confluence of names and numbers may yet uncover a cosmic conundrum that is both profound and jocular. The "Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox" that we present here might just be the scientific equivalent of a touchdown dance—intriguing, captivating, and guaranteed to leave a lasting impression.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data gleaned from the US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com brings us to the intriguing nexus of the name "Whitley" and the performance of the Buffalo Bills in the NFL. Our investigation has unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6540958, an r-squared of 0.4278413, and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a remarkably significant relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Fig. 1 illustrates the compelling scatterplot, showcasing the compelling correlation between the popularity of the name "Whitley" and the points scored by the Buffalo Bills.

The statistically robust correlation we uncovered suggests that the popularity of the name "Whitley" may indeed wield a mysterious influence over the scoring prowess of the Buffalo Bills. This paradoxical connection, akin to a long bomb pass in the quirky playbook of statistical anomalies, beckons for further scrutiny and contemplation. It prompts us to ponder whether there may be an unseen force at play, akin to the cosmic alignments that influence the trajectories of celestial bodies.

Our findings pave the way for a whimsical yet serious inquiry into the mystique of names and their potential influence on the fates of sporting entities. The "Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox" has left us with an enigmatic puzzle that defies easy explanations, yet promises to entertain and captivate the scientific and sporting communities alike.

As we stand at the intersection of statistical oddities and athletic achievements, let us not lose sight of the whimsy and wonder that the "Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox" unfurls before us. It is a charming conundrum that reminds us of the delightful surprises that can emerge when one delves into the labyrinth of data and human experience, akin to stumbling upon a hidden Easter egg in the grand tapestry of statistical and athletic endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Whitley and Points scored by the Buffalo Bills. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Name Game: Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the peculiar phenomena of the first name "Whitley" in relation to the performance of the Buffalo Bills in the NFL. Through meticulous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com spanning the years 1982 to 2022, we unveil a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6540958 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings suggest an intriguing link between the popularity of the name "Whitley" and the points scored by the Buffalo Bills. Further investigation is warranted to unravel this enigmatic connection, which might just be the touchdown pass of statistical anomalies in the realm of naming and football.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature surrounding the intriguing relationship between the name "Whitley" and the performance of the Buffalo Bills is a fascinating blend of statistical analysis and whimsical curiosity. Smith et al. (2010) conducted a comprehensive study delving into the societal impact of first names, while Doe and Jones (2015) explored the psychological implications of name popularity. Both studies provide a valuable foundation for understanding the multifaceted nature of names and their potential influences.
In "The Power of Names," Smith et al. (2010) examine the cultural significance of first names and their societal implications. The authors delve into the complex interplay between nomenclature and human perception, shedding light on the potential psychological and social effects of name popularity. The study serves as a thought-provoking backdrop for our investigation into the enigmatic allure of the name "Whitley" and its unlikely correlation to football performance.
Furthermore, in "The Psychology of Names," Doe and Jones (2015) offer a nuanced exploration of the psychological underpinnings of name popularity. Their research delves into the subconscious associations and perceptions tied to specific names, uncovering intriguing insights into the potential impact of nomenclature on individual behaviors and societal dynamics. Such psychological nuances may underpin the curious connection between the name "Whitley" and the Buffalo Bills' scoring prowess, warranting deeper exploration.
Diverging from the realm of non-fiction, several fictional works offer whimsical perspectives on the idiosyncrasies of names and their potential influences. "The Name of the Rose" by Umberto Eco, though not directly related to naming conventions in football, provides a fascinating exploration of semiotics and the significance of language—a theme that resonates with our investigation into the whimsical world of names and football performance.
Similarly, the classic novel "Jane Eyre" by Charlotte Brontë, through its titular character, offers a poignant reflection on the significance of individual names and their symbolic implications. While the novel may not directly address football statistics, the themes of identity and influence intertwined with names offer a thought-provoking lens through which to contemplate the unexpected correlation between the name "Whitley" and the Buffalo Bills' scoring prowess.
In exploring the realm of popular culture, television shows such as "The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air" and "A Different World" offer nuanced portrayals of character names and their cultural connotations. The eclectic mix of names in these shows provides a lighthearted yet insightful backdrop for contemplating the peculiar connection between the name "Whitley" and the Buffalo Bills' performance, infusing our scholarly pursuit with a touch of whimsy and mirth.
As we navigate this juxtaposition between earnest academic inquiry and lighthearted musings, the literature review sets the stage for our charming exploration of the "Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox." Embracing the intersection of statistical curiosities and whimsical revelations, we embark on a scholarly escapade that promises to enlighten and entertain in equal measure.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data gleaned from the US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com brings us to the intriguing nexus of the name "Whitley" and the performance of the Buffalo Bills in the NFL. Our investigation has unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6540958, an r-squared of 0.4278413, and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a remarkably significant relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Fig. 1 illustrates the compelling scatterplot, showcasing the compelling correlation between the popularity of the name "Whitley" and the points scored by the Buffalo Bills.
The statistically robust correlation we uncovered suggests that the popularity of the name "Whitley" may indeed wield a mysterious influence over the scoring prowess of the Buffalo Bills. This paradoxical connection, akin to a long bomb pass in the quirky playbook of statistical anomalies, beckons for further scrutiny and contemplation. It prompts us to ponder whether there may be an unseen force at play, akin to the cosmic alignments that influence the trajectories of celestial bodies.
Our findings pave the way for a whimsical yet serious inquiry into the mystique of names and their potential influence on the fates of sporting entities. The "Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox" has left us with an enigmatic puzzle that defies easy explanations, yet promises to entertain and captivate the scientific and sporting communities alike.
As we stand at the intersection of statistical oddities and athletic achievements, let us not lose sight of the whimsy and wonder that the "Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox" unfurls before us. It is a charming conundrum that reminds us of the delightful surprises that can emerge when one delves into the labyrinth of data and human experience, akin to stumbling upon a hidden Easter egg in the grand tapestry of statistical and athletic endeavors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings illuminate a truly peculiar connection between the name "Whitley" and the performance of the Buffalo Bills, providing a brainteaser that rivals the complexity of a well-executed flea-flicker play. The correlation coefficient of 0.6540958 and the significant p-value endorse the unlikely relationship, urging us to contemplate the potential influences at play. This discovery reinforces the esoteric allure of names and their enigmatic sway over seemingly unrelated domains, akin to a surprise onside kick catching both fans and statisticians off guard.

Harking back to the literature review, the psychological and societal perspectives on name popularity offer intriguing parallels to our results. Smith et al.'s (2010) exploration of the social impact of names, though not specifically focused on sports, resonates with the unexpected link we have uncovered. Likewise, Doe and Jones' (2015) study on the psychology of names provides insight into the subconscious associations tied to nomenclature, echoing the mysterious influence "Whitley" seems to exert on the Buffalo Bills' scoring prowess. These earlier works, which may have initially seemed like mere placeholders in the end zone of academic literature, have now emerged as playmaking contributors to our understanding of this whimsical conundrum.

Our results not only corroborate but also enrich the whimsical juxtaposition between earnest statistical investigation and serendipitous findings, reminiscent of an unlikely quarterback-turned-receiver completing a Hail Mary pass.

Intriguingly, our study teases the possibility that there may be undiscovered forces at play, much like the elusive phenomenon of a ball spinning through an unpredictable trajectory mid-air. This unexpected link between a name and football performance adds a dash of whimsy to our scholarly pursuits, akin to a fumble-turned-touchdown celebrating the unpredictability of human experience.

As the "Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox" continues to bewilder and captivate, we are reminded that within the world of statistics lies a theater of the unexpected—a field where the most surprising finds lurk amidst the sea of data. Our investigation has unveiled a convivial anomaly that promises to spark lively contemplation and delight, akin to a boisterous touchdown celebration in the often-serious arena of academic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Whitley and Points scored by the Buffalo Bills. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Name Game: Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research delves into the peculiar phenomena of the first name "Whitley" in relation to the performance of the Buffalo Bills in the NFL. Through meticulous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com spanning the years 1982 to 2022, we unveil a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6540958 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings suggest an intriguing link between the popularity of the name "Whitley" and the points scored by the Buffalo Bills. Further investigation is warranted to unravel this enigmatic connection, which might just be the touchdown pass of statistical anomalies in the realm of naming and football.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The whimsical world of statistical anomalies and peculiar correlations never ceases to amaze the astute researcher. In this paper, we embark on a delightful journey to untangle the enchanting mystery of the first name "Whitley" and its potential influence on the performance of the venerable Buffalo Bills in the National Football League (NFL). Despite what the skeptics might say, there is amusement and enlightening knowledge to be unveiled at the intersection of nomenclature and athletic prowess.
As we venture into the labyrinth of data, let us first set the stage for our investigation. The nickname "Whitley" emerges from the sprawling tapestry of American first names, bearing a charming and distinct charm that beckons us to explore its hidden depths. Meanwhile, the Buffalo Bills stand as a formidable and time-honored institution in the grand colosseum of professional football, with a legacy as rich and tantalizing as a freshly baked touchdown pie.
Through a fusion of data hailing from the US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com, our quest for revelations leads us to an unexpected aftermath. The correlation coefficient of 0.6540958, coupled with a p-value less than 0.01, hints at a connection more tantalizing than a well-executed flea flicker play. This charming synchronization between the popularity of the name "Whitley" and the points scored by the Buffalo Bills beckons us to plunge deeper into the annals of naming conventions and athletic triumphs. It poses an enigma that tickles the fancy of the inquisitive soul and sets our imaginations on a fascinating voyage into the realm of statistical curiosities.
As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we sincerely hope that readers will join us in this whimsical exploration, where the confluence of names and numbers may yet uncover a cosmic conundrum that is both profound and jocular. The "Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox" that we present here might just be the scientific equivalent of a touchdown dance—intriguing, captivating, and guaranteed to leave a lasting impression.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data gleaned from the US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com brings us to the intriguing nexus of the name "Whitley" and the performance of the Buffalo Bills in the NFL. Our investigation has unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6540958, an r-squared of 0.4278413, and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a remarkably significant relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Fig. 1 illustrates the compelling scatterplot, showcasing the compelling correlation between the popularity of the name "Whitley" and the points scored by the Buffalo Bills.
The statistically robust correlation we uncovered suggests that the popularity of the name "Whitley" may indeed wield a mysterious influence over the scoring prowess of the Buffalo Bills. This paradoxical connection, akin to a long bomb pass in the quirky playbook of statistical anomalies, beckons for further scrutiny and contemplation. It prompts us to ponder whether there may be an unseen force at play, akin to the cosmic alignments that influence the trajectories of celestial bodies.
Our findings pave the way for a whimsical yet serious inquiry into the mystique of names and their potential influence on the fates of sporting entities. The "Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox" has left us with an enigmatic puzzle that defies easy explanations, yet promises to entertain and captivate the scientific and sporting communities alike.
As we stand at the intersection of statistical oddities and athletic achievements, let us not lose sight of the whimsy and wonder that the "Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox" unfurls before us. It is a charming conundrum that reminds us of the delightful surprises that can emerge when one delves into the labyrinth of data and human experience, akin to stumbling upon a hidden Easter egg in the grand tapestry of statistical and athletic endeavors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our exploration into the captivating conundrum of the "Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox" has undoubtedly left us as giddy as a quarterback who's just thrown a game-winning Hail Mary pass. The robust correlation coefficient and significant p-value have presented us with a statistical oddity that is as puzzling as it is amusing. It's as if we've stumbled upon a fumble recovery in the end zone - unexpected and yet strangely delightful.

The serendipitous link between the popularity of the name "Whitley" and the points scored by the Buffalo Bills opens a Pandora's Box of whimsical possibilities. Could there be a cosmic force at play, akin to the mysterious influences that govern the trajectories of comets? Or perhaps there is a hidden playbook in the realm of statistical anomalies—where names and numbers dance together in an intricate ballet, reminiscent of a well-coordinated end zone celebration.

As we bid adieu to this endearing paradox, we urge fellow researchers to revel in the charm and merriment it has bestowed upon us, much like a surprise onside kick that keeps the game of statistical inquiry entertaining and lighthearted. With a correlation coefficient as inexplicably strong as a defensive line refusing to yield, we can confidently assert that no further research is needed in this area. After all, sometimes, statistical anomalies are simply meant to be enjoyed like a touchdown dance in the end zone of scientific inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Name Game: Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sports Science and Conundrums


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Name Game: Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Advancement of Nonsensical Research (SANR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Name Game: Whitley's Placekicker/Receiver Paradox with an abstract of This research delves into the peculiar phenomena of the first name "Whitley" in relation to the performance of the Buffalo Bills in the NFL. Through meticulous analysis of data from the US Social Security Administration and Pro-Football-Reference.com spanning the years 1982 to 2022, we unveil a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.6540958 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our findings suggest an intriguing link between the popularity of the name "Whitley" and the points scored by the Buffalo Bills. Further investigation is warranted to unravel this enigmatic connection, which might just be the touchdown pass of statistical anomalies in the realm of naming and football.

ChatGPT:

Whitley, Buffalo Bills, NFL, first name popularity, Whitley name correlation, Social Security Administration data, Pro Football Reference statistics, name performance in sports, statistical anomalies, naming trends in football

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Whitley
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Whitley
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Whitley

Points scored by the Buffalo Bills
Detailed data title: Total points scored during the year by the Buffalo Bills
Source: Pro-Football-Reference.com
See what else correlates with Points scored by the Buffalo Bills

Correlation r = 0.6540958 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4278413 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 42.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Points scored by the Buffalo Bills) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Whitley) over the 41 years from 1982 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.5E-6. 0.0000035184214219979625000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.65 in 0.00035% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 284,218 random variables You don't actually need 284 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 40 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 40 because we have two variables measured over a period of 41 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.43, 0.8 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19821983198419851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Whitley (Babies born)50668505214924483752432061871461341111161041049099839291908182111127164168185211238284300306328308369377
Points scored by the Buffalo Bills (Bills points)150283250200287270329409428458381329340350319255400320315265379243395271300252336258283372344339343379399302269314501483455




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5,0,6,6,8,50,521,492,448,375,243,206,187,146,134,111,116,104,104,90,99,83,92,91,90,81,82,111,127,164,168,185,211,238,284,300,306,328,308,369,377,])
array_2 = np.array([150,283,250,200,287,270,329,409,428,458,381,329,340,350,319,255,400,320,315,265,379,243,395,271,300,252,336,258,283,372,344,339,343,379,399,302,269,314,501,483,455,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Whitley"
array_2_name = "Points scored by the Buffalo Bills"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 1950 · Black Variable ID: 4192 · Red Variable ID: 19681
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0