about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,915 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the score difference decreased, so did the spidey senses of the fans. With a closer game, they were too wrapped up in the baseball action to focus on trapping spiders. The web of excitement on the field left them with no room to catch any arachnids at home. It seems when the stakes are high in the World Series, the only thing getting caught are fly balls, not spiders. Who knew that the secret to spider-free homes lay in the outcome of the final game! Remember, a tight game keeps the spider traps at bay.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image in the style of cute 2D animation that shows the winning team of the World Series celebrating their victory with a 3-run lead. Meanwhile, in a quiet corner of the stadium, depict a fan sitting discreetly and using their phone to google "how to trap a spider" as a spider crawls along the edge of their seat. The celebration should be joyful and energetic, while the fan's action should be subtle and perhaps comically anxious. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art a Polaroid photo Cyberpunk Symbolism Cute 2D animation
ChatGPT: Cute 2D animation

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the final game of the World Series, the winning team celebrates their victory with a 3-run lead, while in a quiet corner of the stadium, a fan discreetly googles "how to trap a spider" on their phone, as a spider crawls along the edge of their seat.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute 2D animation ] and depicting this scene: In the final game of the World Series, the winning team celebrates their victory with a 3-run lead, while in a quiet corner of the stadium, a fan discreetly googles "how to trap a spider" on their phone, as a spider crawls along the edge of their seat. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image in the style of cute 2D animation that shows the winning team of the World Series celebrating their victory with a 3-run lead. Meanwhile, in a quiet corner of the stadium, depict a fan sitting discreetly and using their phone to google "how to trap a spider" as a spider crawls along the edge of their seat. The celebration should be joyful and energetic, while the fan's action should be subtle and perhaps comically anxious.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series caused how to trap a spider (Google searches for 'how to trap a spider') to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Spidey Scores: The Surprising Connection Between World Series Score Difference and Arachnid Traps

The Journal of Eccentric Ecological Discoveries

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6888648 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Spidey Scores: The Surprising Connection Between World Series Score Difference and Arachnid Traps

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Drawing from data obtained from Wikipedia and Google Trends, the research team conducted an analysis covering the years 2007 to 2022. The study found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6888648 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a high likelihood that the observed relationship is not due to random chance. The unexpected link between baseball game outcomes and spider-trapping inquiries raises intriguing questions about the human psyche and the quirky interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research sheds light on the quirkier side of human behavior and the peculiar ways in which our interests may be influenced by seemingly unrelated external factors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spidey Scores: The Surprising Connection Between World Series Score Difference and Arachnid Traps

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Drawing from data obtained from Wikipedia and Google Trends, the research team conducted an analysis covering the years 2007 to 2022. The study found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6888648 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a high likelihood that the observed relationship is not due to random chance. The unexpected link between baseball game outcomes and spider-trapping inquiries raises intriguing questions about the human psyche and the quirky interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research sheds light on the quirkier side of human behavior and the peculiar ways in which our interests may be influenced by seemingly unrelated external factors.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The World Series, an annual championship series of Major League Baseball, has long been a subject of close scrutiny and analysis by sports enthusiasts and statisticians alike. The nail-biting tension, the high-stakes drama, and the tantalizing possibility of a grand slam all contribute to the allure of this famed sporting event. However, amidst the excitement of bat-and-ball, a rather unexpected connection has emerged, prompting us to delve into the peculiar interplay between this pinnacle of athletic competition and an altogether different realm - the spider-catching domain.

While one might not immediately associate the final game of the World Series with the prospect of spider entrapment, our investigation into the matter has revealed a surprising correlation between the score difference in this pivotal game and the level of interest in capturing our arachnid friends. The notion that the outcome of a baseball game could hold sway over our inclination to seek out tips for corralling eight-legged critters may appear implausible at first glance. Yet, as we shall illustrate, the linkage between these seemingly disparate phenomena extends beyond mere happenstance, and instead opens up a web of intriguing possibilities.

The present inquiry aims to uncover the underlying mechanisms driving the observed correlation, utilizing a range of statistical methods and data sources. By dissecting the association between the intensity of World Series outcomes and the public's proclivity to contemplate spider-trapping techniques, we hope to shed light on the peculiar entanglement of sports fervor and everyday curiosities. In doing so, we endeavor to illuminate the less-explored dimensions of human behavior, and to offer a lively examination of the quirks that animate our collective consciousness.

While our investigation is underpinned by a serious scientific inquiry, at its core lies a curiosity for the unexpected and a dedication to unearthing the whimsical aspects of human interaction with the world around us. As we embark on this journey of discovery, we invite the reader to join us in unraveling the enigmatic connection between the World Series score difference and our increasingly entangled relationship with the world of arachnids.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spidey Scores: The Surprising Connection Between World Series Score Difference and Arachnid Traps

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Drawing from data obtained from Wikipedia and Google Trends, the research team conducted an analysis covering the years 2007 to 2022. The study found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6888648 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a high likelihood that the observed relationship is not due to random chance. The unexpected link between baseball game outcomes and spider-trapping inquiries raises intriguing questions about the human psyche and the quirky interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research sheds light on the quirkier side of human behavior and the peculiar ways in which our interests may be influenced by seemingly unrelated external factors.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The World Series, an annual championship series of Major League Baseball, has long been a subject of close scrutiny and analysis by sports enthusiasts and statisticians alike. The nail-biting tension, the high-stakes drama, and the tantalizing possibility of a grand slam all contribute to the allure of this famed sporting event. However, amidst the excitement of bat-and-ball, a rather unexpected connection has emerged, prompting us to delve into the peculiar interplay between this pinnacle of athletic competition and an altogether different realm - the spider-catching domain.
While one might not immediately associate the final game of the World Series with the prospect of spider entrapment, our investigation into the matter has revealed a surprising correlation between the score difference in this pivotal game and the level of interest in capturing our arachnid friends. The notion that the outcome of a baseball game could hold sway over our inclination to seek out tips for corralling eight-legged critters may appear implausible at first glance. Yet, as we shall illustrate, the linkage between these seemingly disparate phenomena extends beyond mere happenstance, and instead opens up a web of intriguing possibilities.
The present inquiry aims to uncover the underlying mechanisms driving the observed correlation, utilizing a range of statistical methods and data sources. By dissecting the association between the intensity of World Series outcomes and the public's proclivity to contemplate spider-trapping techniques, we hope to shed light on the peculiar entanglement of sports fervor and everyday curiosities. In doing so, we endeavor to illuminate the less-explored dimensions of human behavior, and to offer a lively examination of the quirks that animate our collective consciousness.
While our investigation is underpinned by a serious scientific inquiry, at its core lies a curiosity for the unexpected and a dedication to unearthing the whimsical aspects of human interaction with the world around us. As we embark on this journey of discovery, we invite the reader to join us in unraveling the enigmatic connection between the World Series score difference and our increasingly entangled relationship with the world of arachnids.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous research has laid the groundwork for our investigation into the link between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider.' Smith (2010) provided an in-depth analysis of sports-related phenomena and their unexpected connections to seemingly unrelated domains. Similarly, Doe (2015) explored the intricacies of human behavior and the propensity for curiosity-driven activities. Furthermore, Jones (2018) delved into the complexities of internet search patterns and the underlying motivations behind seemingly mundane inquiries. These scholarly works offer valuable insights into the broader context of our study and provide a foundation for exploring the quirky relationship between baseball outcomes and arachnid entrapment inquiries.

Turning our attention to related non-fiction works, "Spiders: A Comprehensive Guide to Arachnid Behavior" by ArachnoSmith (2017) presents a comprehensive examination of spider behaviors and the human inclination to interact with these fascinating creatures. In a similar vein, "Baseball: A Statistical Analysis of America's Favorite Pastime" by BatJones (2019) offers an in-depth exploration of the statistical intricacies of baseball and the potential ripple effects of game outcomes on unrelated human activities.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, "The Amazing Spider-Man: The Untold Story" by MarvelDoe (2013) has captivated audiences with its imaginative portrayal of a web-slinging superhero and the impact of his adventures on the collective human consciousness. On a more whimsical note, "Charlotte's Web" by E. B. White (1952) provides a timeless narrative that intertwines the world of barnyard animals with the poignant tale of a remarkable spider. While these fictional works may not offer direct insights into our research question, their portrayal of human-spider interactions and the remarkable influence of sports-themed storytelling on popular culture adds a layer of playful nuance to our exploration of the World Series and spider-trapping curiosities.

As we delve into the intersection of baseball fervor and spider-catching intrigue, it is essential to acknowledge the unconventional sources that have informed our inquiry. Childhood cartoons such as "Spider-Man: The Animated Series" and "The Baseball Bunch" have undoubtedly left indelible impressions on our collective consciousness, highlighting the enduring fascination with both athletic endeavors and arachnid encounters. Through these seemingly disparate yet strangely interconnected influences, our investigation takes on a delightfully curious and unexpected dimension, inviting us to reflect on the quirks and oddities that color our human experience.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends . You used data from 2007 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spidey Scores: The Surprising Connection Between World Series Score Difference and Arachnid Traps

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Drawing from data obtained from Wikipedia and Google Trends, the research team conducted an analysis covering the years 2007 to 2022. The study found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6888648 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a high likelihood that the observed relationship is not due to random chance. The unexpected link between baseball game outcomes and spider-trapping inquiries raises intriguing questions about the human psyche and the quirky interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research sheds light on the quirkier side of human behavior and the peculiar ways in which our interests may be influenced by seemingly unrelated external factors.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The World Series, an annual championship series of Major League Baseball, has long been a subject of close scrutiny and analysis by sports enthusiasts and statisticians alike. The nail-biting tension, the high-stakes drama, and the tantalizing possibility of a grand slam all contribute to the allure of this famed sporting event. However, amidst the excitement of bat-and-ball, a rather unexpected connection has emerged, prompting us to delve into the peculiar interplay between this pinnacle of athletic competition and an altogether different realm - the spider-catching domain.
While one might not immediately associate the final game of the World Series with the prospect of spider entrapment, our investigation into the matter has revealed a surprising correlation between the score difference in this pivotal game and the level of interest in capturing our arachnid friends. The notion that the outcome of a baseball game could hold sway over our inclination to seek out tips for corralling eight-legged critters may appear implausible at first glance. Yet, as we shall illustrate, the linkage between these seemingly disparate phenomena extends beyond mere happenstance, and instead opens up a web of intriguing possibilities.
The present inquiry aims to uncover the underlying mechanisms driving the observed correlation, utilizing a range of statistical methods and data sources. By dissecting the association between the intensity of World Series outcomes and the public's proclivity to contemplate spider-trapping techniques, we hope to shed light on the peculiar entanglement of sports fervor and everyday curiosities. In doing so, we endeavor to illuminate the less-explored dimensions of human behavior, and to offer a lively examination of the quirks that animate our collective consciousness.
While our investigation is underpinned by a serious scientific inquiry, at its core lies a curiosity for the unexpected and a dedication to unearthing the whimsical aspects of human interaction with the world around us. As we embark on this journey of discovery, we invite the reader to join us in unraveling the enigmatic connection between the World Series score difference and our increasingly entangled relationship with the world of arachnids.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The first step in this study involved collecting data on the score difference in the final game of the World Series from the years 2007 to 2022. This data was obtained from publicly available sources, including but not limited to sports databases, baseball fan forums, and even the occasional carrier pigeon bearing statistics. It was imperative to ensure comprehensive coverage of all relevant games, regardless of the teams in contention or the potential presence of spider-themed mascots.

In parallel, the research team turned its attention to the rather curious domain of spider-related Internet searches. Utilizing the enigmatic powers of the all-knowing Google Trends, we examined the frequency of searches for 'how to trap a spider' during corresponding periods to the World Series final games. The team had to navigate through an intricate web of internet data, occasionally getting entangled in other curious search queries along the way, such as "Do spiders like baseball?", "Infield fly rule for spiders," and "Eight-legged outfielders: a biological analysis."

Having amassed this diverse array of data, the next stage of the methodology involved rigorously analyzing the relationship between the score difference in the final World Series game and the volume of spider-trapping inquiries. Statistical procedures were employed to determine the strength and significance of any observed associations, ensuring that the findings were not merely a chance occurrence brought about by an errant foul ball or an off-target Google search.

The analysis included the calculation of correlation coefficients and the application of regression models to explore the extent to which variations in the World Series score difference could explain the fluctuations in the public's interest in spider entrapment strategies. This process demanded a keen eye for detail, as any oversight could result in drawing conclusions that were as tangled as a spider's web after a rainstorm – a predicament the research team was determined to avoid.

Furthermore, to validate the robustness of the findings, sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the stability of the observed relationship across different time periods and subgroups of interest. This enabled the research team to ascertain the generalizability of the results while ensuring that the study did not fall prey to the whims of an unpredictable sports season or an unexpected surge in arachnophobia.

In summary, the methodology employed in this study combined the meticulous gathering of data from diverse sources with the rigorous application of statistical methods to uncover the captivating relationship between seemingly incongruous phenomena. Despite the occasional sticky situation and the alluring temptations of puns, the research team remained steadfast in its commitment to unraveling the enthralling mystery of Spidey Scores.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends .

For the time period 2007 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6888648, r-squared of 0.4745348, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spidey Scores: The Surprising Connection Between World Series Score Difference and Arachnid Traps

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Drawing from data obtained from Wikipedia and Google Trends, the research team conducted an analysis covering the years 2007 to 2022. The study found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6888648 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a high likelihood that the observed relationship is not due to random chance. The unexpected link between baseball game outcomes and spider-trapping inquiries raises intriguing questions about the human psyche and the quirky interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research sheds light on the quirkier side of human behavior and the peculiar ways in which our interests may be influenced by seemingly unrelated external factors.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The World Series, an annual championship series of Major League Baseball, has long been a subject of close scrutiny and analysis by sports enthusiasts and statisticians alike. The nail-biting tension, the high-stakes drama, and the tantalizing possibility of a grand slam all contribute to the allure of this famed sporting event. However, amidst the excitement of bat-and-ball, a rather unexpected connection has emerged, prompting us to delve into the peculiar interplay between this pinnacle of athletic competition and an altogether different realm - the spider-catching domain.
While one might not immediately associate the final game of the World Series with the prospect of spider entrapment, our investigation into the matter has revealed a surprising correlation between the score difference in this pivotal game and the level of interest in capturing our arachnid friends. The notion that the outcome of a baseball game could hold sway over our inclination to seek out tips for corralling eight-legged critters may appear implausible at first glance. Yet, as we shall illustrate, the linkage between these seemingly disparate phenomena extends beyond mere happenstance, and instead opens up a web of intriguing possibilities.
The present inquiry aims to uncover the underlying mechanisms driving the observed correlation, utilizing a range of statistical methods and data sources. By dissecting the association between the intensity of World Series outcomes and the public's proclivity to contemplate spider-trapping techniques, we hope to shed light on the peculiar entanglement of sports fervor and everyday curiosities. In doing so, we endeavor to illuminate the less-explored dimensions of human behavior, and to offer a lively examination of the quirks that animate our collective consciousness.
While our investigation is underpinned by a serious scientific inquiry, at its core lies a curiosity for the unexpected and a dedication to unearthing the whimsical aspects of human interaction with the world around us. As we embark on this journey of discovery, we invite the reader to join us in unraveling the enigmatic connection between the World Series score difference and our increasingly entangled relationship with the world of arachnids.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data from 2007 to 2022 revealed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.6888648, p < 0.01) between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the volume of Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) was found to be 0.4745348, indicating that 47.45% of the variation in spider trapping searches can be explained by the score difference in the World Series final game.

The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually depicts the robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The upward trend in the plot elegantly captures the parallel increase in the World Series score difference and the Google searches for spider-trapping methods. Although we are all for uncovering novel and unexpected links, the strength of this association did give us pause – after all, who would have thought that the fate of a baseball game could influence our collective preoccupation with capturing creepy crawlers?

This unexpected finding opens a veritable Pandora's box of questions. Could it be that the nail-biting thrill of a closely contested World Series game sends our collective heart rates soaring, prompting a subconscious desire to assert our control over the pesky creatures lurking in our midst? Or perhaps it's an unconscious urge for control – after all, what better way to regain a sense of dominion than by successfully trapping a spider after a heart-wrenching defeat or a triumphant victory?

Our data analysis did not allow us to pinpoint the precise reasons behind this curious correlation, but we do hope that this revelation sparks further inquiry into the quirky interplay between sports outcomes and our everyday idiosyncrasies. The unexpected nature of this connection serves as a gentle reminder that the human psyche is as intricate as a meticulously woven spider’s web, filled with curious threads that are waiting to be unraveled.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Spidey Scores: The Surprising Connection Between World Series Score Difference and Arachnid Traps

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Drawing from data obtained from Wikipedia and Google Trends, the research team conducted an analysis covering the years 2007 to 2022. The study found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6888648 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a high likelihood that the observed relationship is not due to random chance. The unexpected link between baseball game outcomes and spider-trapping inquiries raises intriguing questions about the human psyche and the quirky interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research sheds light on the quirkier side of human behavior and the peculiar ways in which our interests may be influenced by seemingly unrelated external factors.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous research has laid the groundwork for our investigation into the link between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider.' Smith (2010) provided an in-depth analysis of sports-related phenomena and their unexpected connections to seemingly unrelated domains. Similarly, Doe (2015) explored the intricacies of human behavior and the propensity for curiosity-driven activities. Furthermore, Jones (2018) delved into the complexities of internet search patterns and the underlying motivations behind seemingly mundane inquiries. These scholarly works offer valuable insights into the broader context of our study and provide a foundation for exploring the quirky relationship between baseball outcomes and arachnid entrapment inquiries.
Turning our attention to related non-fiction works, "Spiders: A Comprehensive Guide to Arachnid Behavior" by ArachnoSmith (2017) presents a comprehensive examination of spider behaviors and the human inclination to interact with these fascinating creatures. In a similar vein, "Baseball: A Statistical Analysis of America's Favorite Pastime" by BatJones (2019) offers an in-depth exploration of the statistical intricacies of baseball and the potential ripple effects of game outcomes on unrelated human activities.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, "The Amazing Spider-Man: The Untold Story" by MarvelDoe (2013) has captivated audiences with its imaginative portrayal of a web-slinging superhero and the impact of his adventures on the collective human consciousness. On a more whimsical note, "Charlotte's Web" by E. B. White (1952) provides a timeless narrative that intertwines the world of barnyard animals with the poignant tale of a remarkable spider. While these fictional works may not offer direct insights into our research question, their portrayal of human-spider interactions and the remarkable influence of sports-themed storytelling on popular culture adds a layer of playful nuance to our exploration of the World Series and spider-trapping curiosities.
As we delve into the intersection of baseball fervor and spider-catching intrigue, it is essential to acknowledge the unconventional sources that have informed our inquiry. Childhood cartoons such as "Spider-Man: The Animated Series" and "The Baseball Bunch" have undoubtedly left indelible impressions on our collective consciousness, highlighting the enduring fascination with both athletic endeavors and arachnid encounters. Through these seemingly disparate yet strangely interconnected influences, our investigation takes on a delightfully curious and unexpected dimension, inviting us to reflect on the quirks and oddities that color our human experience.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from 2007 to 2022 revealed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.6888648, p < 0.01) between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the volume of Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) was found to be 0.4745348, indicating that 47.45% of the variation in spider trapping searches can be explained by the score difference in the World Series final game.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually depicts the robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The upward trend in the plot elegantly captures the parallel increase in the World Series score difference and the Google searches for spider-trapping methods. Although we are all for uncovering novel and unexpected links, the strength of this association did give us pause – after all, who would have thought that the fate of a baseball game could influence our collective preoccupation with capturing creepy crawlers?
This unexpected finding opens a veritable Pandora's box of questions. Could it be that the nail-biting thrill of a closely contested World Series game sends our collective heart rates soaring, prompting a subconscious desire to assert our control over the pesky creatures lurking in our midst? Or perhaps it's an unconscious urge for control – after all, what better way to regain a sense of dominion than by successfully trapping a spider after a heart-wrenching defeat or a triumphant victory?
Our data analysis did not allow us to pinpoint the precise reasons behind this curious correlation, but we do hope that this revelation sparks further inquiry into the quirky interplay between sports outcomes and our everyday idiosyncrasies. The unexpected nature of this connection serves as a gentle reminder that the human psyche is as intricate as a meticulously woven spider’s web, filled with curious threads that are waiting to be unraveled.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study have shed light on the intriguing relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. The robust positive correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables, as depicted by the correlation coefficient of 0.6888648 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, aligns with the prior research on unexpected connections in seemingly disparate domains.

Drawing from the literature review, the work of Smith (2010) and Doe (2015) served as a guiding beacon, illuminating the unexpected links between sports-related phenomena and curiosity-driven activities. The connection between the nail-biting intensity of a closely contested World Series game and the subsequent surge in spider-trapping inquiries reflects the intricate interplay between our emotional engagements and peculiar, seemingly unrelated daily endeavors. The whimsical influences of childhood cartoons and fiction, as highlighted by MarvelDoe (2013) and E. B. White (1952), have added a layer of playful nuance to our exploration, reiterating the playful and unexpected dimensions that enrich our human experiences.

Our results provide empirical support for these prior works, demonstrating that the unanticipated allure of a pivotal baseball showdown can indeed nudge individuals toward seeking control over the eight-legged inhabitants sharing our living spaces. The coefficient of determination of 0.4745348 further underscores that 47.45% of the variation in spider trapping searches can be attributed to the score difference in the World Series final game, laying a statistical foundation for the unexpected psychological phenomena at play.

The unexpected nature of this connection invites further inquiry into the quirks and oddities that color our human experiences. While our study did not decipher the precise motives driving this peculiar correlation, it serves as a gentle reminder that the human psyche is as intricate and surprising as a meticulously woven spider’s web, filled with curious threads waiting to unravel.

In conclusion, this research has opened up a captivating Pandora's box of questions, nudging us to delve deeper into the whimsical interplay between sports outcomes and our everyday idiosyncrasies. As we contemplate the unexpected ways in which our passions and pursuits intertwine, the Spidey Scores phenomenon stands as a whimsical ode to the peculiar curiosities that define our human nature.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Spidey Scores: The Surprising Connection Between World Series Score Difference and Arachnid Traps

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the curious relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Drawing from data obtained from Wikipedia and Google Trends, the research team conducted an analysis covering the years 2007 to 2022. The study found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6888648 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a high likelihood that the observed relationship is not due to random chance. The unexpected link between baseball game outcomes and spider-trapping inquiries raises intriguing questions about the human psyche and the quirky interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research sheds light on the quirkier side of human behavior and the peculiar ways in which our interests may be influenced by seemingly unrelated external factors.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The World Series, an annual championship series of Major League Baseball, has long been a subject of close scrutiny and analysis by sports enthusiasts and statisticians alike. The nail-biting tension, the high-stakes drama, and the tantalizing possibility of a grand slam all contribute to the allure of this famed sporting event. However, amidst the excitement of bat-and-ball, a rather unexpected connection has emerged, prompting us to delve into the peculiar interplay between this pinnacle of athletic competition and an altogether different realm - the spider-catching domain.
While one might not immediately associate the final game of the World Series with the prospect of spider entrapment, our investigation into the matter has revealed a surprising correlation between the score difference in this pivotal game and the level of interest in capturing our arachnid friends. The notion that the outcome of a baseball game could hold sway over our inclination to seek out tips for corralling eight-legged critters may appear implausible at first glance. Yet, as we shall illustrate, the linkage between these seemingly disparate phenomena extends beyond mere happenstance, and instead opens up a web of intriguing possibilities.
The present inquiry aims to uncover the underlying mechanisms driving the observed correlation, utilizing a range of statistical methods and data sources. By dissecting the association between the intensity of World Series outcomes and the public's proclivity to contemplate spider-trapping techniques, we hope to shed light on the peculiar entanglement of sports fervor and everyday curiosities. In doing so, we endeavor to illuminate the less-explored dimensions of human behavior, and to offer a lively examination of the quirks that animate our collective consciousness.
While our investigation is underpinned by a serious scientific inquiry, at its core lies a curiosity for the unexpected and a dedication to unearthing the whimsical aspects of human interaction with the world around us. As we embark on this journey of discovery, we invite the reader to join us in unraveling the enigmatic connection between the World Series score difference and our increasingly entangled relationship with the world of arachnids.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from 2007 to 2022 revealed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.6888648, p < 0.01) between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the volume of Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. The coefficient of determination (r-squared) was found to be 0.4745348, indicating that 47.45% of the variation in spider trapping searches can be explained by the score difference in the World Series final game.
The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually depicts the robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The upward trend in the plot elegantly captures the parallel increase in the World Series score difference and the Google searches for spider-trapping methods. Although we are all for uncovering novel and unexpected links, the strength of this association did give us pause – after all, who would have thought that the fate of a baseball game could influence our collective preoccupation with capturing creepy crawlers?
This unexpected finding opens a veritable Pandora's box of questions. Could it be that the nail-biting thrill of a closely contested World Series game sends our collective heart rates soaring, prompting a subconscious desire to assert our control over the pesky creatures lurking in our midst? Or perhaps it's an unconscious urge for control – after all, what better way to regain a sense of dominion than by successfully trapping a spider after a heart-wrenching defeat or a triumphant victory?
Our data analysis did not allow us to pinpoint the precise reasons behind this curious correlation, but we do hope that this revelation sparks further inquiry into the quirky interplay between sports outcomes and our everyday idiosyncrasies. The unexpected nature of this connection serves as a gentle reminder that the human psyche is as intricate as a meticulously woven spider’s web, filled with curious threads that are waiting to be unraveled.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has unveiled a rather unexpected entwining of two seemingly unrelated domains - the nail-biting world of baseball and the intriguing realm of arachnid entrapment. The robust correlation between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and the volume of Google searches for 'how to trap a spider' has left us spinning with curiosity, much like a confused spider caught in its own web. The statistically significant findings not only endorse the presence of a genuine link between these peculiar variables but also beckon us to venture further into the uncharted territories of human behavior and its whims.

The realization that the intensity of a baseball game could spark a surge in our collective interest in confining our arachnid counterparts is as bewildering as stumbling upon a spider web in an unexpected place – surprising, whimsical, and oddly fascinating. It prompts us to ponder whether the nail-biting tension of a close World Series game compels us to seek a semblance of control by contemplating the capture of our eight-legged adversaries. Alternatively, it may be a subconscious manifestation of our desire to weave our own web of triumph in the aftermath of emotional sporting conquests.

Our findings underscore the intricate tapestry of human behavior, offering a gentle nudge to explore the quirky interstices that punctuate our daily lives. As we navigate the labyrinthine corridors of human curiosity, it is increasingly clear that the whims of the human mind are as unpredictable as the erratic movements of an unsuspecting spider. Our study, despite its offbeat nature, underscores the need to embrace the unanticipated and to celebrate the whimsical harmonies that thread through the symphony of our collective consciousness.

However, as intriguing as these findings may be, we must acknowledge the limitations of our study and resist the temptation to spin an elaborate web of unfounded conjectures. At this juncture, we contend that further research in this unconventional junction of baseball and spider-catching inquiries would be akin to chasing an elusive spider - entertaining, yet ultimately inconclusive. Therefore, we assert, with all due solemnity, that no further research is needed in this unique intersection of sporting excitement and spider-centric preoccupations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Spidey Scores: The Surprising Connection Between World Series Score Difference and Arachnid Traps. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Eccentric Ecological Discoveries


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Spidey Scores: The Surprising Connection Between World Series Score Difference and Arachnid Traps. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Animal Behavior Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Spidey Scores: The Surprising Connection Between World Series Score Difference and Arachnid Traps with an abstract of This paper investigates the curious relationship between the score difference in the final game of the World Series and Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'. Drawing from data obtained from Wikipedia and Google Trends, the research team conducted an analysis covering the years 2007 to 2022. The study found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6888648 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a high likelihood that the observed relationship is not due to random chance. The unexpected link between baseball game outcomes and spider-trapping inquiries raises intriguing questions about the human psyche and the quirky interplay between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This research sheds light on the quirkier side of human behavior and the peculiar ways in which our interests may be influenced by seemingly unrelated external factors.

ChatGPT:

World Series score difference, arachnid traps, Google searches, spider trapping, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, baseball game outcomes, human psyche, human behavior, external factors, unusual correlations, quirky behavior, unrelated phenomena, Google Trends, Wikipedia data

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series
Detailed data title: Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series

Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to trap a spider' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'

Correlation r = 0.6888648 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4745348 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 47.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to trap a spider') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series) over the 16 years from 2007 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0032. 0.0031648521938760447000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.69 in 0.32% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 316 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.29, 0.88 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series (Score difference)4323142131131222
Google searches for 'how to trap a spider' (Rel. search volume)12.91675.666674.4166745.1666712.91678.255.56.666674.166675.757.166675.666676.755.833336.25




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4,3,2,3,1,4,2,1,3,1,1,3,1,2,2,2,])
array_2 = np.array([12.9167,5.66667,4.41667,4,5.16667,12.9167,8.25,5.5,6.66667,4.16667,5.75,7.16667,5.66667,6.75,5.83333,6.25,])
array_1_name = "Score Difference in the Final Game of the World Series"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to trap a spider'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 1915 · Black Variable ID: 107 · Red Variable ID: 1448
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0