Download png, svg
AI explanation
As GMO cotton in Tennessee became more prevalent, it led to the production of stronger and more resilient fibers. This inadvertently made it easier to wrap and transport a body without leaving a trace. You could say the GMO cotton inadvertently became the "body of evidence" in perfecting the art of concealment.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image depicting a surreal scene set in a vast cotton field in Tennessee. Rows of genetically modified cotton plants extend into the distance, creating a mesmerizing pattern. In the midst of the sprawling greenery, a lone farm worker consults a smartphone, searching for "how to hide a body" on Google. The juxtaposition of the serene landscape with the eerie search on the smartphone creates a thought-provoking visual. Emphasize the tranquility of the cotton field and the stark contrast of the farm worker's actions. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A Discovery magazine cover image An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Parallax art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Scalar art
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and Google searches for 'how to hide a body' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast cotton field in Tennessee, rows of genetically modified cotton plants stretch into the distance. Amidst the sprawling greenery, a farm worker can be seen consulting a smartphone, searching for "how to hide a body" on Google.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a vast cotton field in Tennessee, rows of genetically modified cotton plants stretch into the distance. Amidst the sprawling greenery, a farm worker can be seen consulting a smartphone, searching for "how to hide a body" on Google. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image depicting a surreal scene set in a vast cotton field in Tennessee. Rows of genetically modified cotton plants extend into the distance, creating a mesmerizing pattern. In the midst of the sprawling greenery, a lone farm worker consults a smartphone, searching for "how to hide a body" on Google. The juxtaposition of the serene landscape with the eerie search on the smartphone creates a thought-provoking visual. Emphasize the tranquility of the cotton field and the stark contrast of the farm worker's actions.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in cotton in Tennessee caused how to hide a body (Google searches for 'how to hide a body') to increase. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
Cotton Math: GMOs and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body' in Tennessee The Journal of Irreverent Agronomy Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Include a pun in the title.
Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.5554573 and p < 0.05 for 2005 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton Math: GMOs and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body' in Tennessee"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigated the rather curious connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we embarked on a statistical adventure to unravel this perplexing correlation. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5554573 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the period spanning 2005 to 2022. While the results may seem as bizarre as searching for cotton in a haystack, the implications are nothing short of amusing and thought-provoking. Join us as we unveil the peculiar link between biotechnology and internet queries about clandestine activities, bringing a whole new meaning to ethical concerns and harvesting information.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton Math: GMOs and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body' in Tennessee"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigated the rather curious connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we embarked on a statistical adventure to unravel this perplexing correlation. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5554573 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the period spanning 2005 to 2022. While the results may seem as bizarre as searching for cotton in a haystack, the implications are nothing short of amusing and thought-provoking. Join us as we unveil the peculiar link between biotechnology and internet queries about clandestine activities, bringing a whole new meaning to ethical concerns and harvesting information.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been the subject of widespread debate, speculation, and skepticism, often leaving many to wonder if they are a blessing or a curse, a boon or a bane. The use of GMOs in agriculture has led to fervent discussions about their potential impact on the environment, human health, and, apparently, even criminal activities. In this study, we aim to shed light on a rather unexpected and quirky association between the cultivation of GMO cotton in Tennessee and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Yes, you read that correctly. We are delving into the intriguing intersection of biotechnology and internet queries about clandestine activities.
Imagine stumbling upon a unique correlation between the growth of GMO cotton and the curiosity about the best methods to conceal a body. It's akin to finding a needle in a biotechnological haystack, but once we uncovered this link, we knew there was no turning back.
As we embark on this unusual expedition, we invite you to put on your academic detective hats and join us in unraveling this peculiar association. We assure you that while the topic may seem more lighthearted than your typical research endeavor, the implications are no laughing matter. So, grab a cup of coffee (or tea, if you're feeling fancy) and let's explore the unexpected synergy between agricultural science and macabre internet inquiries.
The correlation coefficient of 0.5554573 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the period from 2005 to 2022 will have you on the edge of your seat, or at the very least, scratching your head in bewilderment. But fear not, for we are here to guide you through this maze of statistical intrigue and criminological curiosities.
As we dive deeper into the whimsical world of GMOs and Google searches, we hope to provide valuable insights that transcend the boundaries of conventional agricultural research. After all, who would have thought that biotechnology and true crime aficionados could find common ground in the digital sphere?
So, without further ado, let us embark on this righteous quest to unravel the outlandish association between cotton math, GMOs, and Google queries about body concealment, and perhaps uncover a few surprises along the way. Stick with us as we traverse through the fields of statistical significance and internet peculiarity, and remember to keep your sense of humor handy – you never know when a statistical anomaly might induce a chuckle.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton Math: GMOs and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body' in Tennessee"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigated the rather curious connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we embarked on a statistical adventure to unravel this perplexing correlation. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5554573 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the period spanning 2005 to 2022. While the results may seem as bizarre as searching for cotton in a haystack, the implications are nothing short of amusing and thought-provoking. Join us as we unveil the peculiar link between biotechnology and internet queries about clandestine activities, bringing a whole new meaning to ethical concerns and harvesting information.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been the subject of widespread debate, speculation, and skepticism, often leaving many to wonder if they are a blessing or a curse, a boon or a bane. The use of GMOs in agriculture has led to fervent discussions about their potential impact on the environment, human health, and, apparently, even criminal activities. In this study, we aim to shed light on a rather unexpected and quirky association between the cultivation of GMO cotton in Tennessee and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Yes, you read that correctly. We are delving into the intriguing intersection of biotechnology and internet queries about clandestine activities.
Imagine stumbling upon a unique correlation between the growth of GMO cotton and the curiosity about the best methods to conceal a body. It's akin to finding a needle in a biotechnological haystack, but once we uncovered this link, we knew there was no turning back.
As we embark on this unusual expedition, we invite you to put on your academic detective hats and join us in unraveling this peculiar association. We assure you that while the topic may seem more lighthearted than your typical research endeavor, the implications are no laughing matter. So, grab a cup of coffee (or tea, if you're feeling fancy) and let's explore the unexpected synergy between agricultural science and macabre internet inquiries.
The correlation coefficient of 0.5554573 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the period from 2005 to 2022 will have you on the edge of your seat, or at the very least, scratching your head in bewilderment. But fear not, for we are here to guide you through this maze of statistical intrigue and criminological curiosities.
As we dive deeper into the whimsical world of GMOs and Google searches, we hope to provide valuable insights that transcend the boundaries of conventional agricultural research. After all, who would have thought that biotechnology and true crime aficionados could find common ground in the digital sphere?
So, without further ado, let us embark on this righteous quest to unravel the outlandish association between cotton math, GMOs, and Google queries about body concealment, and perhaps uncover a few surprises along the way. Stick with us as we traverse through the fields of statistical significance and internet peculiarity, and remember to keep your sense of humor handy – you never know when a statistical anomaly might induce a chuckle.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of the correlation between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and Google searches for 'how to hide a body' in Tennessee is a tale as fascinating as it is unexpected. One might expect scholarly explorations of GMOs to focus on agricultural productivity, environmental impact, or even public health, but the peculiar human curiosity about clandestine activities adds a layer of intrigue that could make even the most seasoned researcher raise an eyebrow.
Smith et al. (2010) initially set the stage for unusual connections between agricultural practices and the human psyche. Their work shed light on the potential societal impact of biotechnological advancements but did not foresee the peculiar fascination with the mysterious art of body concealment. While Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the broader implications of GMOs in agriculture, little did they know that their research could have led to an unforeseen crossover with inquiries about covert activities. It's almost like opening a can of worms and finding a treasure map inside – unexpected, puzzling, and a bit perplexing.
The book "The Hidden Harvest: Genetically Modified Crops and Secret Societies" by A. Gardener (2017) presents a fictional exploration of clandestine activities intersecting with biotechnology. While fictional, this book captivates the imagination with the possibility of a world where GMOs and criminal inquiries collide. It is a reminder that reality can indeed be stranger than fiction, especially when it comes to the unexpected connections we stumble upon in the course of scientific inquiry.
As we navigate this uncharted territory, it is essential to consider the unexpected sources of inspiration that might have influenced the peculiar intersection of GMOs and covert queries. Perhaps the board game "Clue" and its enigmatic search for a perpetrator and a location could have sparked an interest in concealment, albeit in a less dire context. Similarly, the game "Carcassonne" with its intricate farming strategies could have subconsciously ignited a curiosity about the nuances of agricultural practices, including the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation.
At this juncture, it is essential to maintain a sense of humor and an open mind as we embark on this unconventional journey of discovery. The next section will delve into the statistical analysis of this correlation, but let's not forget to appreciate the unexpected comedic relief in the labyrinth of scholarly exploration. After all, who thought that biotechnology and the art of hidden agendas could find themselves entangled in such a whimsical dance? Let us proceed with caution and a dash of levity as we unravel this intriguing tale, for the path to enlightenment might just be peppered with unexpected chuckles along the way.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2005 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton Math: GMOs and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body' in Tennessee"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigated the rather curious connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we embarked on a statistical adventure to unravel this perplexing correlation. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5554573 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the period spanning 2005 to 2022. While the results may seem as bizarre as searching for cotton in a haystack, the implications are nothing short of amusing and thought-provoking. Join us as we unveil the peculiar link between biotechnology and internet queries about clandestine activities, bringing a whole new meaning to ethical concerns and harvesting information.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been the subject of widespread debate, speculation, and skepticism, often leaving many to wonder if they are a blessing or a curse, a boon or a bane. The use of GMOs in agriculture has led to fervent discussions about their potential impact on the environment, human health, and, apparently, even criminal activities. In this study, we aim to shed light on a rather unexpected and quirky association between the cultivation of GMO cotton in Tennessee and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Yes, you read that correctly. We are delving into the intriguing intersection of biotechnology and internet queries about clandestine activities.
Imagine stumbling upon a unique correlation between the growth of GMO cotton and the curiosity about the best methods to conceal a body. It's akin to finding a needle in a biotechnological haystack, but once we uncovered this link, we knew there was no turning back.
As we embark on this unusual expedition, we invite you to put on your academic detective hats and join us in unraveling this peculiar association. We assure you that while the topic may seem more lighthearted than your typical research endeavor, the implications are no laughing matter. So, grab a cup of coffee (or tea, if you're feeling fancy) and let's explore the unexpected synergy between agricultural science and macabre internet inquiries.
The correlation coefficient of 0.5554573 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the period from 2005 to 2022 will have you on the edge of your seat, or at the very least, scratching your head in bewilderment. But fear not, for we are here to guide you through this maze of statistical intrigue and criminological curiosities.
As we dive deeper into the whimsical world of GMOs and Google searches, we hope to provide valuable insights that transcend the boundaries of conventional agricultural research. After all, who would have thought that biotechnology and true crime aficionados could find common ground in the digital sphere?
So, without further ado, let us embark on this righteous quest to unravel the outlandish association between cotton math, GMOs, and Google queries about body concealment, and perhaps uncover a few surprises along the way. Stick with us as we traverse through the fields of statistical significance and internet peculiarity, and remember to keep your sense of humor handy – you never know when a statistical anomaly might induce a chuckle.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
METHODOLOGY
To investigate the intriguing correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to hide a body', we employed a combination of data collection, statistical analysis, and criminological curiosity. Our research methods may have seemed as complex as decoding a cryptic message, but fear not – we shall unravel the enigma for you.
Data Collection:
We gathered data on the adoption of GMO cotton in Tennessee from 2005 to 2022 from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). This included detailed information on the acreage of cotton fields under GMO cultivation, as well as the types of GMO strains used. For the frequency of Google searches for 'how to hide a body', we turned to the treasure trove of internet data provided by Google Trends. The search query data were aggregated and anonymized to provide insights into the temporal patterns of this intriguing online inquiry.
Statistical Analysis:
With our data in hand, we delved into statistical analyses as diverse as the cotton varieties in Tennessee. We calculated the correlation coefficient between the adoption of GMO cotton and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to hide a body' using the Pearson correlation method. Our statistical models navigated through the crosswinds of confounding variables and outliers to reveal the strength and direction of the relationship between these seemingly incongruous factors.
Criminological Curiosities:
In an unconventional twist, we dabbled in criminological theory to understand the potential motivations behind the Google searches for body concealment. We pondered if the allure of clandestine activities was correlated with the widespread adoption of biotechnological advancements in cotton farming, or if this connection was merely a statistical aberration worthy of a trivia quiz.
Limitations and Considerations:
We acknowledge the inherent limitations of utilizing internet search query data as a proxy for behavioral patterns and real-world activities. Furthermore, the scope of our study was confined to the state of Tennessee, and extrapolating the findings to other regions warrants caution. However, despite these limitations, our findings offer a distinctive vantage point – a tongue-in-cheek exploration at the intersection of biotechnology and spooky internet inquiries.
In undertaking this research, we aimed to weave together the strands of agricultural science, statistical analysis, and digital intrigue to shed light on a correlation that elicits both bemusement and contemplation. As we peer through the lens of GMOs and Google searches, we invite our readers to join us in unraveling the whimsical world of cotton math and criminological curiosities. After all, who knew that GMOs and morbid internet queries could make for such an unexpected duo? It seems only fitting to conclude with a pun: let's just say this research left no stone unturned.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .
For the time period 2005 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.5554573, r-squared of 0.3085328, and p < 0.05.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton Math: GMOs and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body' in Tennessee"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigated the rather curious connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we embarked on a statistical adventure to unravel this perplexing correlation. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5554573 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the period spanning 2005 to 2022. While the results may seem as bizarre as searching for cotton in a haystack, the implications are nothing short of amusing and thought-provoking. Join us as we unveil the peculiar link between biotechnology and internet queries about clandestine activities, bringing a whole new meaning to ethical concerns and harvesting information.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been the subject of widespread debate, speculation, and skepticism, often leaving many to wonder if they are a blessing or a curse, a boon or a bane. The use of GMOs in agriculture has led to fervent discussions about their potential impact on the environment, human health, and, apparently, even criminal activities. In this study, we aim to shed light on a rather unexpected and quirky association between the cultivation of GMO cotton in Tennessee and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Yes, you read that correctly. We are delving into the intriguing intersection of biotechnology and internet queries about clandestine activities.
Imagine stumbling upon a unique correlation between the growth of GMO cotton and the curiosity about the best methods to conceal a body. It's akin to finding a needle in a biotechnological haystack, but once we uncovered this link, we knew there was no turning back.
As we embark on this unusual expedition, we invite you to put on your academic detective hats and join us in unraveling this peculiar association. We assure you that while the topic may seem more lighthearted than your typical research endeavor, the implications are no laughing matter. So, grab a cup of coffee (or tea, if you're feeling fancy) and let's explore the unexpected synergy between agricultural science and macabre internet inquiries.
The correlation coefficient of 0.5554573 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the period from 2005 to 2022 will have you on the edge of your seat, or at the very least, scratching your head in bewilderment. But fear not, for we are here to guide you through this maze of statistical intrigue and criminological curiosities.
As we dive deeper into the whimsical world of GMOs and Google searches, we hope to provide valuable insights that transcend the boundaries of conventional agricultural research. After all, who would have thought that biotechnology and true crime aficionados could find common ground in the digital sphere?
So, without further ado, let us embark on this righteous quest to unravel the outlandish association between cotton math, GMOs, and Google queries about body concealment, and perhaps uncover a few surprises along the way. Stick with us as we traverse through the fields of statistical significance and internet peculiarity, and remember to keep your sense of humor handy – you never know when a statistical anomaly might induce a chuckle.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The outcomes of our investigation into the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to hide a body' revealed a rather unexpected and, dare we say, whimsical correlation. From 2005 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.5554573, indicating a moderate positive association between these peculiar variables. Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.3085328 suggested that approximately 30.85% of the variability in 'how to hide a body' Google searches could be explained by the use of GMO cotton.
The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 further bolstered our findings, providing evidence that this correlation was not merely a fortuitous figment of our statistical imagination. Fig. 1 exemplifies the strength of this relationship, showcasing a scatterplot that would make even the most seasoned agricultural statistician do a double-take.
In essence, our research indicates that as the adoption of GMO cotton increased, so did the interest in information regarding the concealment of bodies, as evidenced by the surge in Google searches pertaining to this cryptic topic. While the connection may seem as unlikely as a genetically modified cotton candy, the data speak for themselves, beckoning us to contemplate the intertwining of biotechnological advancements and the enigmatic inquiries of internet users.
Now, some may find it puzzling that such an association exists, but as researchers, we are no strangers to the unexpected and the idiosyncratic. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in embracing the unanticipated and recognizing that even the most incongruous correlations can unveil intriguing insights. After all, who knew that delving into the world of agricultural biotechnology would lead us down a path to pondering clandestine activities?
In the spirit of scientific inquiry, we now turn our attention to dissecting the implications of these findings and delving into the labyrinth of questions that this correlation raises. So, prepare your thinking caps and brace yourselves for a riveting exploration of the unexpected juncture between GMOs and Google searches for less-than-wholesome advice. And, most importantly, let's not forget to appreciate the humor in this peculiar correlation, proving that even in the realm of research, there's always room for a good laugh.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton Math: GMOs and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body' in Tennessee"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigated the rather curious connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we embarked on a statistical adventure to unravel this perplexing correlation. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5554573 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the period spanning 2005 to 2022. While the results may seem as bizarre as searching for cotton in a haystack, the implications are nothing short of amusing and thought-provoking. Join us as we unveil the peculiar link between biotechnology and internet queries about clandestine activities, bringing a whole new meaning to ethical concerns and harvesting information.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of the correlation between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and Google searches for 'how to hide a body' in Tennessee is a tale as fascinating as it is unexpected. One might expect scholarly explorations of GMOs to focus on agricultural productivity, environmental impact, or even public health, but the peculiar human curiosity about clandestine activities adds a layer of intrigue that could make even the most seasoned researcher raise an eyebrow.
Smith et al. (2010) initially set the stage for unusual connections between agricultural practices and the human psyche. Their work shed light on the potential societal impact of biotechnological advancements but did not foresee the peculiar fascination with the mysterious art of body concealment. While Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the broader implications of GMOs in agriculture, little did they know that their research could have led to an unforeseen crossover with inquiries about covert activities. It's almost like opening a can of worms and finding a treasure map inside – unexpected, puzzling, and a bit perplexing.
The book "The Hidden Harvest: Genetically Modified Crops and Secret Societies" by A. Gardener (2017) presents a fictional exploration of clandestine activities intersecting with biotechnology. While fictional, this book captivates the imagination with the possibility of a world where GMOs and criminal inquiries collide. It is a reminder that reality can indeed be stranger than fiction, especially when it comes to the unexpected connections we stumble upon in the course of scientific inquiry.
As we navigate this uncharted territory, it is essential to consider the unexpected sources of inspiration that might have influenced the peculiar intersection of GMOs and covert queries. Perhaps the board game "Clue" and its enigmatic search for a perpetrator and a location could have sparked an interest in concealment, albeit in a less dire context. Similarly, the game "Carcassonne" with its intricate farming strategies could have subconsciously ignited a curiosity about the nuances of agricultural practices, including the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation.
At this juncture, it is essential to maintain a sense of humor and an open mind as we embark on this unconventional journey of discovery. The next section will delve into the statistical analysis of this correlation, but let's not forget to appreciate the unexpected comedic relief in the labyrinth of scholarly exploration. After all, who thought that biotechnology and the art of hidden agendas could find themselves entangled in such a whimsical dance? Let us proceed with caution and a dash of levity as we unravel this intriguing tale, for the path to enlightenment might just be peppered with unexpected chuckles along the way.
[[RESULTS]]
The outcomes of our investigation into the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to hide a body' revealed a rather unexpected and, dare we say, whimsical correlation. From 2005 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.5554573, indicating a moderate positive association between these peculiar variables. Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.3085328 suggested that approximately 30.85% of the variability in 'how to hide a body' Google searches could be explained by the use of GMO cotton.
The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 further bolstered our findings, providing evidence that this correlation was not merely a fortuitous figment of our statistical imagination. Fig. 1 exemplifies the strength of this relationship, showcasing a scatterplot that would make even the most seasoned agricultural statistician do a double-take.
In essence, our research indicates that as the adoption of GMO cotton increased, so did the interest in information regarding the concealment of bodies, as evidenced by the surge in Google searches pertaining to this cryptic topic. While the connection may seem as unlikely as a genetically modified cotton candy, the data speak for themselves, beckoning us to contemplate the intertwining of biotechnological advancements and the enigmatic inquiries of internet users.
Now, some may find it puzzling that such an association exists, but as researchers, we are no strangers to the unexpected and the idiosyncratic. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in embracing the unanticipated and recognizing that even the most incongruous correlations can unveil intriguing insights. After all, who knew that delving into the world of agricultural biotechnology would lead us down a path to pondering clandestine activities?
In the spirit of scientific inquiry, we now turn our attention to dissecting the implications of these findings and delving into the labyrinth of questions that this correlation raises. So, prepare your thinking caps and brace yourselves for a riveting exploration of the unexpected juncture between GMOs and Google searches for less-than-wholesome advice. And, most importantly, let's not forget to appreciate the humor in this peculiar correlation, proving that even in the realm of research, there's always room for a good laugh.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Well, well, well, dear colleagues, let's untangle the web we've spun in this rather whimsical correlation between GMO cotton and Google searches for body concealment. Our findings not only illustrate the statistical significance of this relationship but also tickle the curiosity bone with unexpected revelations.
It's rather amusing, isn't it? The idea that GMO cotton and the art of clandestine activities could have a rendezvous in the digital realm. Our results supported the prior research by Smith et al. (2010) and Doe and Jones (2015) who unwittingly set the stage for our discovery. It's as if they planted the seeds from which our peculiar findings would eventually blossom, much like the cotton bolls in a Tennessee field.
Now, thinking seriously, our statistical analysis has confirmed a moderate positive association between the use of GMO cotton and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. The correlation coefficient of 0.5554573 not only raised eyebrows but also demonstrated a noteworthy relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. While it may seem as incongruous as finding a needle in a biologically modified haystack, the significance of our findings cannot be overstated.
These results may prompt us to reevaluate the way we view the world, reminding us that curiosity knows no bounds and sometimes leads us down unforeseen paths. While our study may have stumbled upon an unexpected correlation, it is a testament to the multifaceted impact of agricultural biotechnology on our collective psyche.
As we prepare for further exploration of the implications of our findings, let's not forget the unexpected journeys of discovery that science can take us on. After all, who would have thought that a study on GMO cotton in Tennessee could lead us to contemplate the mysteries of human inquisitiveness?
So, as we mull over the implications and delve deeper into the enigmatic relationship between GMOs and Google searches for less-than-wholesome advice, let's not lose sight of the unexpected chuckles that research can bring. After all, a little humor goes a long way, especially when it comes to unraveling the mysteries of human behavior and the quirky correlations that seem to pop up when least expected.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Tennessee and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Cotton Math: GMOs and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body' in Tennessee"
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigated the rather curious connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we embarked on a statistical adventure to unravel this perplexing correlation. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5554573 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the period spanning 2005 to 2022. While the results may seem as bizarre as searching for cotton in a haystack, the implications are nothing short of amusing and thought-provoking. Join us as we unveil the peculiar link between biotechnology and internet queries about clandestine activities, bringing a whole new meaning to ethical concerns and harvesting information.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been the subject of widespread debate, speculation, and skepticism, often leaving many to wonder if they are a blessing or a curse, a boon or a bane. The use of GMOs in agriculture has led to fervent discussions about their potential impact on the environment, human health, and, apparently, even criminal activities. In this study, we aim to shed light on a rather unexpected and quirky association between the cultivation of GMO cotton in Tennessee and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Yes, you read that correctly. We are delving into the intriguing intersection of biotechnology and internet queries about clandestine activities.
Imagine stumbling upon a unique correlation between the growth of GMO cotton and the curiosity about the best methods to conceal a body. It's akin to finding a needle in a biotechnological haystack, but once we uncovered this link, we knew there was no turning back.
As we embark on this unusual expedition, we invite you to put on your academic detective hats and join us in unraveling this peculiar association. We assure you that while the topic may seem more lighthearted than your typical research endeavor, the implications are no laughing matter. So, grab a cup of coffee (or tea, if you're feeling fancy) and let's explore the unexpected synergy between agricultural science and macabre internet inquiries.
The correlation coefficient of 0.5554573 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the period from 2005 to 2022 will have you on the edge of your seat, or at the very least, scratching your head in bewilderment. But fear not, for we are here to guide you through this maze of statistical intrigue and criminological curiosities.
As we dive deeper into the whimsical world of GMOs and Google searches, we hope to provide valuable insights that transcend the boundaries of conventional agricultural research. After all, who would have thought that biotechnology and true crime aficionados could find common ground in the digital sphere?
So, without further ado, let us embark on this righteous quest to unravel the outlandish association between cotton math, GMOs, and Google queries about body concealment, and perhaps uncover a few surprises along the way. Stick with us as we traverse through the fields of statistical significance and internet peculiarity, and remember to keep your sense of humor handy – you never know when a statistical anomaly might induce a chuckle.
[[RESULTS]]
The outcomes of our investigation into the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to hide a body' revealed a rather unexpected and, dare we say, whimsical correlation. From 2005 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.5554573, indicating a moderate positive association between these peculiar variables. Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.3085328 suggested that approximately 30.85% of the variability in 'how to hide a body' Google searches could be explained by the use of GMO cotton.
The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 further bolstered our findings, providing evidence that this correlation was not merely a fortuitous figment of our statistical imagination. Fig. 1 exemplifies the strength of this relationship, showcasing a scatterplot that would make even the most seasoned agricultural statistician do a double-take.
In essence, our research indicates that as the adoption of GMO cotton increased, so did the interest in information regarding the concealment of bodies, as evidenced by the surge in Google searches pertaining to this cryptic topic. While the connection may seem as unlikely as a genetically modified cotton candy, the data speak for themselves, beckoning us to contemplate the intertwining of biotechnological advancements and the enigmatic inquiries of internet users.
Now, some may find it puzzling that such an association exists, but as researchers, we are no strangers to the unexpected and the idiosyncratic. We invite our esteemed colleagues to join us in embracing the unanticipated and recognizing that even the most incongruous correlations can unveil intriguing insights. After all, who knew that delving into the world of agricultural biotechnology would lead us down a path to pondering clandestine activities?
In the spirit of scientific inquiry, we now turn our attention to dissecting the implications of these findings and delving into the labyrinth of questions that this correlation raises. So, prepare your thinking caps and brace yourselves for a riveting exploration of the unexpected juncture between GMOs and Google searches for less-than-wholesome advice. And, most importantly, let's not forget to appreciate the humor in this peculiar correlation, proving that even in the realm of research, there's always room for a good laugh.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our investigation has unfurled a correlation more surprising than finding a pair of cargo pants in a biotech lab. The connection between the use of GMOs in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to hide a body' has certainly raised more eyebrows than a 90s boy band. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.5554573 and the p-value less than 0.05 have left us more puzzled than trying to assemble IKEA furniture without the instructions.
As we reflect on these findings, we can't help but marvel at the ever-unpredictable nature of scientific inquiry. It's a bit like a game of Clue, isn't it? Who knew that Colonel Mustard was in the conservatory with a bottle of Roundup Ready cotton? But in all seriousness, the implications of our research cannot be overlooked. We must consider the societal implications and ponder the ramifications of this unusual link between agricultural biotechnology and true crime-related internet searches. It's like a crossover episode of "Law and Order" and "The Food Network" that we never saw coming.
Despite the humor this unforeseen association may provoke, we must acknowledge the potential ethical and practical considerations that arise. Who would have thought that the intersection of biotechnology and cyber sleuthing would lead us down such a peculiar path? In the spirit of scholarly exploration, we urge our fellow researchers to embrace the unconventional and the unexpected, for who knows what other enigmatic connections await our discovery in the vast expanse of research?
In the vein of full disclosure, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. We believe that this is quite enough cotton math for now, and it's time to reroute our academic GPS to more conventional agricultural investigations. In the words of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, it's time to close this case and bid adieu to the perplexing correlation between GMOs and Google searches for 'how to hide a body'.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Cotton Math: GMOs and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body' in Tennessee. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Irreverent Agronomy
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Cotton Math: GMOs and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body' in Tennessee. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Quirky Agricultural Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Cotton Math: GMOs and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body' in Tennessee with an abstract of In this study, we investigated the rather curious connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Tennessee and the prevalence of Google searches for 'how to hide a body'. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we embarked on a statistical adventure to unravel this perplexing correlation. Our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.5554573 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the period spanning 2005 to 2022. While the results may seem as bizarre as searching for cotton in a haystack, the implications are nothing short of amusing and thought-provoking. Join us as we unveil the peculiar link between biotechnology and internet queries about clandestine activities, bringing a whole new meaning to ethical concerns and harvesting information.
ChatGPT:
cotton cultivation, genetically modified organisms, GMOs, Tennessee, Google searches, hiding a body, USDA data, Google Trends, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, biotechnology, internet queries, ethical concerns, harvesting information
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
GMO use in cotton in TennesseeDetailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Tennessee genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Tennessee
Google searches for 'how to hide a body'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to hide a body' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to hide a body'
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.3085328 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 30.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to hide a body') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Tennessee) over the 18 years from 2005 through 2022.
p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.017. 0.0167042880741677630000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.56 in 1.7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 60 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.12, 0.81 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
GMO use in cotton in Tennessee (GMO cotton %) | 96 | 93 | 98 | 97 | 97 | 98 | 98 | 97 | 96 | 99 | 99 | 98 | 99 | 96 | 99 | 97 | 99 | 99 |
Google searches for 'how to hide a body' (Rel. search volume) | 6.33333 | 6.58333 | 8.25 | 15.75 | 15.5833 | 16.25 | 30.1667 | 51.4167 | 54.0833 | 83 | 70.5833 | 43.6667 | 38.75 | 36.4167 | 41.3333 | 56.5833 | 75.25 | 72.25 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([96,93,98,97,97,98,98,97,96,99,99,98,99,96,99,97,99,99,])
array_2 = np.array([6.33333,6.58333,8.25,15.75,15.5833,16.25,30.1667,51.4167,54.0833,83,70.5833,43.6667,38.75,36.4167,41.3333,56.5833,75.25,72.25,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Tennessee"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to hide a body'"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only GMO use in cotton in Tennessee
- Line chart for only Google searches for 'how to hide a body'
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Cotton Math: GMOs and Google Searches for 'How to Hide a Body' in Tennessee
Your rating skills are legendary!
Correlation ID: 1890 · Black Variable ID: 810 · Red Variable ID: 1513