about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,846 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'cat memes' and the second variable is Associates degrees awarded in Theology.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the world became more familiar with the concept of the 'purr-fect' existence through cat memes, individuals felt a spiritual awakening, prompting them to pursue a deeper understanding of life and the universe. The memes served as a catalyst for contemplation, leading to a surge in interest in Theology and religious vocations. It's almost as if the internet was saying, "Let there be purr-spective!"

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s depicting a cozy living room. A person is sitting on a comfortable couch with a laptop open, typing "cat memes" into the Google search bar. Near the laptop, a framed certificate for an Associate's degree in Theology and religious vocations hangs on the wall, surrounded by peaceful, spiritual decor. The lighting should be warm and inviting, capturing the homely atmosphere of the scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Google searches for 'cat memes' and Associates degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Scalar art Futuristic An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Art nouveau
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Google searches for 'cat memes' and Associates degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy living room, a person is sitting on a comfortable couch with a laptop open, typing "cat memes" into the Google search bar. Near the laptop, a framed certificate for an Associate's degree in Theology and religious vocations hangs on the wall, surrounded by peaceful, spiritual decor.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy living room, a person is sitting on a comfortable couch with a laptop open, typing "cat memes" into the Google search bar. Near the laptop, a framed certificate for an Associate's degree in Theology and religious vocations hangs on the wall, surrounded by peaceful, spiritual decor. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s depicting a cozy living room. A person is sitting on a comfortable couch with a laptop open, typing "cat memes" into the Google search bar. Near the laptop, a framed certificate for an Associate's degree in Theology and religious vocations hangs on the wall, surrounded by peaceful, spiritual decor. The lighting should be warm and inviting, capturing the homely atmosphere of the scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in cat memes (Google searches for 'cat memes') caused Associates degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Feline Funnies and Divine Degrees: A Pawsitively Purrplexing Correlation between 'Cat Memes' Google Searches and Associates Degrees in Theology and Religious Vocations

The Whiskered Wisdom Journal

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Associates degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and National Center for Education Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9492033 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Feline Funnies and Divine Degrees: A Pawsitively Purrplexing Correlation between 'Cat Memes' Google Searches and Associates Degrees in Theology and Religious Vocations"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of 'cat memes' in internet culture and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations. Leveraging data from Google Trends and the National Center for Education Statistics, we sought to untangle this seemingly whimsical yet statistically significant association. Through rigorous analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9492033 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the unprecedented influence of feline-themed humor on educational pursuits in spiritual disciplines, but also raise tantalizing questions about the interconnectedness of internet trends and academic pathways. This study underscores the need for scholarly exploration of seemingly lighthearted phenomena, urging researchers to embrace the unexpected avenues through which human interests manifest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Associates degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Feline Funnies and Divine Degrees: A Pawsitively Purrplexing Correlation between 'Cat Memes' Google Searches and Associates Degrees in Theology and Religious Vocations"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of 'cat memes' in internet culture and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations. Leveraging data from Google Trends and the National Center for Education Statistics, we sought to untangle this seemingly whimsical yet statistically significant association. Through rigorous analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9492033 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the unprecedented influence of feline-themed humor on educational pursuits in spiritual disciplines, but also raise tantalizing questions about the interconnectedness of internet trends and academic pathways. This study underscores the need for scholarly exploration of seemingly lighthearted phenomena, urging researchers to embrace the unexpected avenues through which human interests manifest.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the realm of academic inquiry, it is not uncommon for researchers to stumble upon perplexing and unexpected correlations that pique intellectual curiosity. While the pursuit of knowledge often leads us down conventional paths, occasionally, we find ourselves venturing into uncharted territories of inquiry that may at first glance seem whimsical or inconsequential. Such is the case with the present study, where we seek to unravel the fascinating relationship between the abundance of 'cat memes' in the digital sphere and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations.

Upon first encounter, one may be forgiven for raising a skeptical eyebrow at the notion that the online quest for feline-themed humor could be intertwined with the pursuit of theological education. Nevertheless, the world of statistical analysis often invites us to explore the unexpected and uncover the hidden connections that underlie seemingly disparate phenomena. This investigation has been guided by the curious confluence of cultural trends and academic pursuits, prompting us to delve into the depths of Google searches and educational statistics in search of elucidation.

Indeed, as we embark on this journey of inquiry, we must keep in mind the dialectic between the playful and the profound, the ridiculous and the reverent. While the notion of 'cat memes' may evoke lighthearted amusement, our endeavor to uncover their relationship to the conferral of degrees in theological disciplines is driven by a firm commitment to rigorous scholarship and scientific inquiry. It is in this spirit that we endeavor to examine the correlation between these unlikely bedfellows, all the while maintaining a keen sense of intellectual levity in our approach.

As we tread the hallowed halls of statistical analysis and scholarly investigation, we invite the reader to join us in this whimsical yet intellectually stimulating endeavor, as we untangle the web of 'cat memes' and theological education with fervor and feline fascination.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Associates degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Feline Funnies and Divine Degrees: A Pawsitively Purrplexing Correlation between 'Cat Memes' Google Searches and Associates Degrees in Theology and Religious Vocations"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of 'cat memes' in internet culture and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations. Leveraging data from Google Trends and the National Center for Education Statistics, we sought to untangle this seemingly whimsical yet statistically significant association. Through rigorous analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9492033 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the unprecedented influence of feline-themed humor on educational pursuits in spiritual disciplines, but also raise tantalizing questions about the interconnectedness of internet trends and academic pathways. This study underscores the need for scholarly exploration of seemingly lighthearted phenomena, urging researchers to embrace the unexpected avenues through which human interests manifest.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is not uncommon for researchers to stumble upon perplexing and unexpected correlations that pique intellectual curiosity. While the pursuit of knowledge often leads us down conventional paths, occasionally, we find ourselves venturing into uncharted territories of inquiry that may at first glance seem whimsical or inconsequential. Such is the case with the present study, where we seek to unravel the fascinating relationship between the abundance of 'cat memes' in the digital sphere and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations.
Upon first encounter, one may be forgiven for raising a skeptical eyebrow at the notion that the online quest for feline-themed humor could be intertwined with the pursuit of theological education. Nevertheless, the world of statistical analysis often invites us to explore the unexpected and uncover the hidden connections that underlie seemingly disparate phenomena. This investigation has been guided by the curious confluence of cultural trends and academic pursuits, prompting us to delve into the depths of Google searches and educational statistics in search of elucidation.
Indeed, as we embark on this journey of inquiry, we must keep in mind the dialectic between the playful and the profound, the ridiculous and the reverent. While the notion of 'cat memes' may evoke lighthearted amusement, our endeavor to uncover their relationship to the conferral of degrees in theological disciplines is driven by a firm commitment to rigorous scholarship and scientific inquiry. It is in this spirit that we endeavor to examine the correlation between these unlikely bedfellows, all the while maintaining a keen sense of intellectual levity in our approach.
As we tread the hallowed halls of statistical analysis and scholarly investigation, we invite the reader to join us in this whimsical yet intellectually stimulating endeavor, as we untangle the web of 'cat memes' and theological education with fervor and feline fascination.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The endeavor to discern the potential correlation between Google searches for 'cat memes' and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations has prompted a thorough investigation into existing literature.
Smith et al. (2015) examined the impact of internet memes on cultural trends, touching upon the pervasive influence of feline-themed humor within online communities. Interestingly, their findings hinted at the potential for memes to shape societal behaviors, albeit with a focus on a broader spectrum of cultural phenomena.
Expanding the scope of inquiry to educational pursuits, Doe (2018) delved into the factors influencing student enrollment in religious studies programs, emphasizing the role of contemporary influences in shaping academic interests. This work, while not specifically addressing 'cat memes,' laid the groundwork for considering external factors in the realm of theological education.

Moving beyond strictly academic research, Jones' "Kitty Capers: A Cultural History of Cat Memes" (2019) offers an intriguing exploration of the cultural significance of cat-themed internet humor, although its focus remains predominantly on the societal impact rather than academic pathways.
On a divergent yet tangentially related note, "Divine Paws: Nurturing the Spirit through Feline Companions" (Purrington, 2006) takes a heartwarming look at the spiritual connection between humans and cats, potentially alluding to the broader spiritual realm encompassing theological education, in a metaphorical sense.
With these scholarly and semi-scholarly works as a foundation, the authors find themselves at a crossroads where serious inquiry meets the unexplored frontiers of internet humor and spiritual vocations. As the pursuit of knowledge often demands, the exploration of this peculiar connection between 'cat memes' and theological education beckons the academic community to approach the subject matter with intellectual rigor and an appreciative nod to the occasionally whimsical twists of scholarly inquiry.
In addition to traditional sources, the authors have spared no effort in seeking insights from unconventional written sources, including the backs of shampoo bottles, in pursuit of a comprehensive survey of the guidance available in all forms of literature. While these sources may not appear directly related, they have provided valuable reminders to maintain a balanced perspective, cleanliness, and a healthy sense of humor throughout the research process.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Associates degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and National Center for Education Statistics . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Feline Funnies and Divine Degrees: A Pawsitively Purrplexing Correlation between 'Cat Memes' Google Searches and Associates Degrees in Theology and Religious Vocations"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of 'cat memes' in internet culture and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations. Leveraging data from Google Trends and the National Center for Education Statistics, we sought to untangle this seemingly whimsical yet statistically significant association. Through rigorous analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9492033 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the unprecedented influence of feline-themed humor on educational pursuits in spiritual disciplines, but also raise tantalizing questions about the interconnectedness of internet trends and academic pathways. This study underscores the need for scholarly exploration of seemingly lighthearted phenomena, urging researchers to embrace the unexpected avenues through which human interests manifest.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is not uncommon for researchers to stumble upon perplexing and unexpected correlations that pique intellectual curiosity. While the pursuit of knowledge often leads us down conventional paths, occasionally, we find ourselves venturing into uncharted territories of inquiry that may at first glance seem whimsical or inconsequential. Such is the case with the present study, where we seek to unravel the fascinating relationship between the abundance of 'cat memes' in the digital sphere and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations.
Upon first encounter, one may be forgiven for raising a skeptical eyebrow at the notion that the online quest for feline-themed humor could be intertwined with the pursuit of theological education. Nevertheless, the world of statistical analysis often invites us to explore the unexpected and uncover the hidden connections that underlie seemingly disparate phenomena. This investigation has been guided by the curious confluence of cultural trends and academic pursuits, prompting us to delve into the depths of Google searches and educational statistics in search of elucidation.
Indeed, as we embark on this journey of inquiry, we must keep in mind the dialectic between the playful and the profound, the ridiculous and the reverent. While the notion of 'cat memes' may evoke lighthearted amusement, our endeavor to uncover their relationship to the conferral of degrees in theological disciplines is driven by a firm commitment to rigorous scholarship and scientific inquiry. It is in this spirit that we endeavor to examine the correlation between these unlikely bedfellows, all the while maintaining a keen sense of intellectual levity in our approach.
As we tread the hallowed halls of statistical analysis and scholarly investigation, we invite the reader to join us in this whimsical yet intellectually stimulating endeavor, as we untangle the web of 'cat memes' and theological education with fervor and feline fascination.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To disentangle the enigmatic relationship between the proliferation of 'cat memes' in cybernetic arenas and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations, our research team devised an intricate yet, dare we say, purrfectly concocted methodological framework.

First and foremost, data pertaining to Google searches for 'cat memes' was procured from the exhaustive repository of Google Trends. Through this feline-focused portal, we carefully charted the ebbs and flows of internet users' interest in feline frivolity, spanning from the year 2011 to 2021. In what can only be described as a meowtaphorical expedition, our researchers diligently delved into the intricacies of internet culture to capture the zeitgeist of the 'meme-scape'.

On the other paw, we sought to harness the intellectual allure and pedagogical prowess of Theology and religious vocations by marshaling data from the venerable National Center for Education Statistics. Through this august institution, we unearthed a treasure trove of information on the conferral of Associates degrees in the aforementioned disciplines, ensuring that our investigative lens had a keen, almost theological, focus.

Ah, but here is where we tread the fine line between statistical rigidity and the uncharted depths of zany curiosity. Enveloped in the mist of statistical alacrity, we correlated the temporal patterns of 'cat memes' searches with the bestowment of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations to discern any discernible, albeit whimsical, relationship.

Adopting a methodological lens that was as peppery as a ginger cat and as snoozy as a contented tabby, we conducted a correlation analysis to unveil the intricate dance of statistical significance between these seemingly incongruent variables. Like a diligent feline retracting its claws before a mischievous pounce, we employed a Pearson correlation coefficient alongside its formidable comrade-in-arms, the p-value, to showcase the strength and statistical veracity of this unlikely pairing.

In the realm of statistical significance, with its unabashed penchant for intrigue and its flirtatious dance with uncertainty, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9492033, with a p-value that boldly ventured into the domain of less than 0.01. These findings, whisker them as we may, unveiled a rather beguiling association between the prevalence of 'cat memes' and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations, presenting a statistical cat-astrophe that, we must admit, left us purrplexed yet titillated.

In essence, our feline-fueled expedition into the mirthful domain of 'cat memes' and the solemn halls of theological education summoned the spirit of scientific inquiry to unveil an interconnectedness as unexpected as a cat leaping into a bathtub. Thus, armed with statistical precision and an insatiable appetite for academic curiosity, we pounced upon the correlation between these seemingly divergent variables, unwavering in our endeavor to unravel the feline mysteries that pervade the academic world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Associates degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and National Center for Education Statistics .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9492033, r-squared of 0.9009870, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Feline Funnies and Divine Degrees: A Pawsitively Purrplexing Correlation between 'Cat Memes' Google Searches and Associates Degrees in Theology and Religious Vocations"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of 'cat memes' in internet culture and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations. Leveraging data from Google Trends and the National Center for Education Statistics, we sought to untangle this seemingly whimsical yet statistically significant association. Through rigorous analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9492033 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the unprecedented influence of feline-themed humor on educational pursuits in spiritual disciplines, but also raise tantalizing questions about the interconnectedness of internet trends and academic pathways. This study underscores the need for scholarly exploration of seemingly lighthearted phenomena, urging researchers to embrace the unexpected avenues through which human interests manifest.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is not uncommon for researchers to stumble upon perplexing and unexpected correlations that pique intellectual curiosity. While the pursuit of knowledge often leads us down conventional paths, occasionally, we find ourselves venturing into uncharted territories of inquiry that may at first glance seem whimsical or inconsequential. Such is the case with the present study, where we seek to unravel the fascinating relationship between the abundance of 'cat memes' in the digital sphere and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations.
Upon first encounter, one may be forgiven for raising a skeptical eyebrow at the notion that the online quest for feline-themed humor could be intertwined with the pursuit of theological education. Nevertheless, the world of statistical analysis often invites us to explore the unexpected and uncover the hidden connections that underlie seemingly disparate phenomena. This investigation has been guided by the curious confluence of cultural trends and academic pursuits, prompting us to delve into the depths of Google searches and educational statistics in search of elucidation.
Indeed, as we embark on this journey of inquiry, we must keep in mind the dialectic between the playful and the profound, the ridiculous and the reverent. While the notion of 'cat memes' may evoke lighthearted amusement, our endeavor to uncover their relationship to the conferral of degrees in theological disciplines is driven by a firm commitment to rigorous scholarship and scientific inquiry. It is in this spirit that we endeavor to examine the correlation between these unlikely bedfellows, all the while maintaining a keen sense of intellectual levity in our approach.
As we tread the hallowed halls of statistical analysis and scholarly investigation, we invite the reader to join us in this whimsical yet intellectually stimulating endeavor, as we untangle the web of 'cat memes' and theological education with fervor and feline fascination.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis conducted for the period from 2011 to 2021 uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9492033, with an r-squared value of 0.9009870 and a p-value less than 0.01. This indicates a strong positive relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'cat memes' and the number of Associates degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations.

Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the strikingly clear relationship between the two variables. The plot reveals a trend that is akin to a cat's curiosity – undeniably strong and difficult to ignore. The upward trajectory of the scatterplot evokes the graceful and mysterious movements of a cat as it pounces on a laser pointer, capturing the essence of this unexpectedly entwined phenomenon in a visually captivating manner.

It is crucial to note that while the correlation is robust, we must exercise caution in drawing causational inferences. Correlation does not imply causation, and it would be imprudent to assert that 'cat memes' directly lead individuals to pursue degrees in Theology and religious vocations. Nevertheless, the strength of the association prompts us to pause and ponder over the intricate dynamics of online culture and academic aspirations.

In the world of research, it is as though we have stumbled upon a purrplexing puzzle, one that demands our attention and curiosity. This study serves as a reminder to embrace the unexpected and to approach statistical findings with a sense of humor – much like the lighthearted spirit of a cat meme itself.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Associates degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Feline Funnies and Divine Degrees: A Pawsitively Purrplexing Correlation between 'Cat Memes' Google Searches and Associates Degrees in Theology and Religious Vocations"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of 'cat memes' in internet culture and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations. Leveraging data from Google Trends and the National Center for Education Statistics, we sought to untangle this seemingly whimsical yet statistically significant association. Through rigorous analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9492033 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the unprecedented influence of feline-themed humor on educational pursuits in spiritual disciplines, but also raise tantalizing questions about the interconnectedness of internet trends and academic pathways. This study underscores the need for scholarly exploration of seemingly lighthearted phenomena, urging researchers to embrace the unexpected avenues through which human interests manifest.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The endeavor to discern the potential correlation between Google searches for 'cat memes' and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations has prompted a thorough investigation into existing literature.
Smith et al. (2015) examined the impact of internet memes on cultural trends, touching upon the pervasive influence of feline-themed humor within online communities. Interestingly, their findings hinted at the potential for memes to shape societal behaviors, albeit with a focus on a broader spectrum of cultural phenomena.
Expanding the scope of inquiry to educational pursuits, Doe (2018) delved into the factors influencing student enrollment in religious studies programs, emphasizing the role of contemporary influences in shaping academic interests. This work, while not specifically addressing 'cat memes,' laid the groundwork for considering external factors in the realm of theological education.
Moving beyond strictly academic research, Jones' "Kitty Capers: A Cultural History of Cat Memes" (2019) offers an intriguing exploration of the cultural significance of cat-themed internet humor, although its focus remains predominantly on the societal impact rather than academic pathways.
On a divergent yet tangentially related note, "Divine Paws: Nurturing the Spirit through Feline Companions" (Purrington, 2006) takes a heartwarming look at the spiritual connection between humans and cats, potentially alluding to the broader spiritual realm encompassing theological education, in a metaphorical sense.
With these scholarly and semi-scholarly works as a foundation, the authors find themselves at a crossroads where serious inquiry meets the unexplored frontiers of internet humor and spiritual vocations. As the pursuit of knowledge often demands, the exploration of this peculiar connection between 'cat memes' and theological education beckons the academic community to approach the subject matter with intellectual rigor and an appreciative nod to the occasionally whimsical twists of scholarly inquiry.
In addition to traditional sources, the authors have spared no effort in seeking insights from unconventional written sources, including the backs of shampoo bottles, in pursuit of a comprehensive survey of the guidance available in all forms of literature. While these sources may not appear directly related, they have provided valuable reminders to maintain a balanced perspective, cleanliness, and a healthy sense of humor throughout the research process.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted for the period from 2011 to 2021 uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9492033, with an r-squared value of 0.9009870 and a p-value less than 0.01. This indicates a strong positive relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'cat memes' and the number of Associates degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the strikingly clear relationship between the two variables. The plot reveals a trend that is akin to a cat's curiosity – undeniably strong and difficult to ignore. The upward trajectory of the scatterplot evokes the graceful and mysterious movements of a cat as it pounces on a laser pointer, capturing the essence of this unexpectedly entwined phenomenon in a visually captivating manner.
It is crucial to note that while the correlation is robust, we must exercise caution in drawing causational inferences. Correlation does not imply causation, and it would be imprudent to assert that 'cat memes' directly lead individuals to pursue degrees in Theology and religious vocations. Nevertheless, the strength of the association prompts us to pause and ponder over the intricate dynamics of online culture and academic aspirations.
In the world of research, it is as though we have stumbled upon a purrplexing puzzle, one that demands our attention and curiosity. This study serves as a reminder to embrace the unexpected and to approach statistical findings with a sense of humor – much like the lighthearted spirit of a cat meme itself.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study illuminate a rather purrplexing yet undeniably significant correlation between Google searches for 'cat memes' and the awarding of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations. This unexpected finding not only aligns with prior research on the potential influence of internet memes on cultural trends but also adds a whimsical twist to the serious realm of educational pursuits in spiritual disciplines.

Building upon the work of Smith et al. (2015), whose insights hinted at the ability of memes to shape societal behaviors, our findings suggest that 'cat memes' wield an unprecedented influence, leading individuals down the contemplative path of theological education. While the serious implications of this relationship cannot be overlooked, we cannot help but marvel at the wondrous, albeit feline-themed, journey that this correlation has taken us on.

Doe's (2018) exploration into the factors influencing student enrollment in religious studies programs, though not directly addressing 'cat memes,' has laid the groundwork for our understanding of external influences on theological education. The unexpected alignment of our results with Doe's prior findings cannot escape notice, reminding us that scholarly inquiry often paves the way for serendipitous discoveries.

Moreover, in light of Purrington's (2006) work on the spiritual connection between humans and cats, we are prompted to consider the metaphorical significance of feline companionship in the context of theological education. There seems to be an almost divine alignment between the enigmatic allure of cat behavior and the pursuit of spiritual understanding, as reflected in our statistically robust findings. While these connections may seem far-fetched at first glance, they underscore the intrinsic interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated societal phenomena.

In extending the dialogue to include unconventional sources of insight, including the backs of shampoo bottles, our study has reinforced the necessity of maintaining a balanced perspective and a healthy sense of humor in the pursuit of knowledge. It is as though the wisps of wisdom from these diverse sources have gently nudged us towards embracing the unexpected, much like the delightfully unpredictable nature of 'cat memes' and their influence on academic pathways.

It is essential to acknowledge the limitations of our study. We must tread cautiously, recognizing that correlation does not imply causation, and the enthralling association uncovered in our findings must be met with a degree of scholarly skepticism. Nonetheless, the statistically significant relationship between 'cat memes' and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations demands a thoughtful reevaluation of the boundaries between internet culture and academic pursuits.

Our study has transcended the conventional confines of research, presenting a captivating illustration of the unexpected yet poignant interplay between online humor and scholarly pursuits. As we continue to unravel the mysteries underpinning societal trends and educational choices, the feline-inspired capers of our statistical exploration serve as a lighthearted yet thought-provoking reminder to embrace the delightful uncertainties that research often unveils.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Associates degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Feline Funnies and Divine Degrees: A Pawsitively Purrplexing Correlation between 'Cat Memes' Google Searches and Associates Degrees in Theology and Religious Vocations"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of 'cat memes' in internet culture and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations. Leveraging data from Google Trends and the National Center for Education Statistics, we sought to untangle this seemingly whimsical yet statistically significant association. Through rigorous analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9492033 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the unprecedented influence of feline-themed humor on educational pursuits in spiritual disciplines, but also raise tantalizing questions about the interconnectedness of internet trends and academic pathways. This study underscores the need for scholarly exploration of seemingly lighthearted phenomena, urging researchers to embrace the unexpected avenues through which human interests manifest.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, it is not uncommon for researchers to stumble upon perplexing and unexpected correlations that pique intellectual curiosity. While the pursuit of knowledge often leads us down conventional paths, occasionally, we find ourselves venturing into uncharted territories of inquiry that may at first glance seem whimsical or inconsequential. Such is the case with the present study, where we seek to unravel the fascinating relationship between the abundance of 'cat memes' in the digital sphere and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations.
Upon first encounter, one may be forgiven for raising a skeptical eyebrow at the notion that the online quest for feline-themed humor could be intertwined with the pursuit of theological education. Nevertheless, the world of statistical analysis often invites us to explore the unexpected and uncover the hidden connections that underlie seemingly disparate phenomena. This investigation has been guided by the curious confluence of cultural trends and academic pursuits, prompting us to delve into the depths of Google searches and educational statistics in search of elucidation.
Indeed, as we embark on this journey of inquiry, we must keep in mind the dialectic between the playful and the profound, the ridiculous and the reverent. While the notion of 'cat memes' may evoke lighthearted amusement, our endeavor to uncover their relationship to the conferral of degrees in theological disciplines is driven by a firm commitment to rigorous scholarship and scientific inquiry. It is in this spirit that we endeavor to examine the correlation between these unlikely bedfellows, all the while maintaining a keen sense of intellectual levity in our approach.
As we tread the hallowed halls of statistical analysis and scholarly investigation, we invite the reader to join us in this whimsical yet intellectually stimulating endeavor, as we untangle the web of 'cat memes' and theological education with fervor and feline fascination.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis conducted for the period from 2011 to 2021 uncovered a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9492033, with an r-squared value of 0.9009870 and a p-value less than 0.01. This indicates a strong positive relationship between the frequency of Google searches for 'cat memes' and the number of Associates degrees awarded in Theology and religious vocations.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the strikingly clear relationship between the two variables. The plot reveals a trend that is akin to a cat's curiosity – undeniably strong and difficult to ignore. The upward trajectory of the scatterplot evokes the graceful and mysterious movements of a cat as it pounces on a laser pointer, capturing the essence of this unexpectedly entwined phenomenon in a visually captivating manner.
It is crucial to note that while the correlation is robust, we must exercise caution in drawing causational inferences. Correlation does not imply causation, and it would be imprudent to assert that 'cat memes' directly lead individuals to pursue degrees in Theology and religious vocations. Nevertheless, the strength of the association prompts us to pause and ponder over the intricate dynamics of online culture and academic aspirations.
In the world of research, it is as though we have stumbled upon a purrplexing puzzle, one that demands our attention and curiosity. This study serves as a reminder to embrace the unexpected and to approach statistical findings with a sense of humor – much like the lighthearted spirit of a cat meme itself.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the results of our study highlight the seemingly improbable yet statistically robust correlation between Google searches for 'cat memes' and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations. The feline-themed trend appears to pawsitively purrplex academic pursuits in spiritual disciplines, leaving us with a curious conundrum. As we reflect on the statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9492033, one cannot help but admire the uncanny allure of this connection, much like a cat's ability to mesmerize with its enigmatic presence.

While our findings do not imply a direct causal relationship, they undoubtedly raise intriguing questions about the interplay between internet culture and educational endeavors in theological fields. It is as though the whimsical world of 'cat memes' has stealthily crept into the hallowed halls of theological inquiry, meowing a siren song that beckons students toward the pursuit of divine knowledge.

We encourage fellow scholars to embrace the unexpected and delight in the lighthearted curiosity that pervades this correlation, akin to the playful antics of a mischievous feline companion. However, given the emphatic strength of our statistical findings, it is with a straight face that we assert that further research in this domain may be as unnecessary as herding cats. The statistical relationship has been illuminated, and it appears that in this instance, the mystery of 'cat memes' and divine degrees has been nicely unpacked.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Feline Funnies and Divine Degrees: A Pawsitively Purrplexing Correlation between 'Cat Memes' Google Searches and Associates Degrees in Theology and Religious Vocations. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Whiskered Wisdom Journal


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Feline Funnies and Divine Degrees: A Pawsitively Purrplexing Correlation between 'Cat Memes' Google Searches and Associates Degrees in Theology and Religious Vocations. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for Feline and Ecclesiastical Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Feline Funnies and Divine Degrees: A Pawsitively Purrplexing Correlation between 'Cat Memes' Google Searches and Associates Degrees in Theology and Religious Vocations with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing relationship between the prevalence of 'cat memes' in internet culture and the conferral of Associates degrees in Theology and religious vocations. Leveraging data from Google Trends and the National Center for Education Statistics, we sought to untangle this seemingly whimsical yet statistically significant association. Through rigorous analysis, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9492033 with p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings not only shed light on the unprecedented influence of feline-themed humor on educational pursuits in spiritual disciplines, but also raise tantalizing questions about the interconnectedness of internet trends and academic pathways. This study underscores the need for scholarly exploration of seemingly lighthearted phenomena, urging researchers to embrace the unexpected avenues through which human interests manifest.

ChatGPT:

'cat memes', Google searches, associates degrees, theology, religious vocations, internet culture, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, Google Trends, National Center for Education Statistics, academic pathways, spiritual disciplines, internet trends, scholarly exploration

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'cat memes'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'cat memes' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'cat memes'

Associates degrees awarded in Theology
Detailed data title: Associate's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions with a field of study of Theology and religious vocations
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associates degrees awarded in Theology

Correlation r = 0.9492033 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9009870 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Associates degrees awarded in Theology) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'cat memes') over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.2E-6. 0.0000081617367369691190000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 0.00082% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 122,523 random variables You don't actually need 122 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Google searches for 'cat memes' (Rel. search volume)1.69.2519.2519.529.7536.666740.535.7545.333330.166721
Associates degrees awarded in Theology (Degrees awarded)758839881944113510891164112711311079982




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1.6,9.25,19.25,19.5,29.75,36.6667,40.5,35.75,45.3333,30.1667,21,])
array_2 = np.array([758,839,881,944,1135,1089,1164,1127,1131,1079,982,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'cat memes'"
array_2_name = "Associates degrees awarded in Theology"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 1846 · Black Variable ID: 1355 · Red Variable ID: 1258
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0