Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the number of 1st graders in public schools in El Salvador increases, so does the demand for school buses, leading to a fossil fuel frenzy! It seems these youngsters are really *fueling* the nation's transportation sector. Seems like El Salvador is experiencing a grade-1 surge in fossil fuel use, all thanks to their education system's popularity! The situation is getting pretty *elementary*, my dear Watson.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a black-and-white newspaper illustration of a lively classroom in El Salvador. Show a group of 1st grade students sitting at their desks, absorbed in learning, with colorful drawings and educational posters decorating the classroom walls. Meanwhile, outside the window, depict a line of school buses emitting fossil fuel exhaust as they transport students to and from school. The contrast between the vibrant interior and the pollution outside should be evident in the illustration. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Number of public school students in 1st grade and Fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Art nouveau Photorealism Data cyber art A black-and-white newspaper illustration A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: A black-and-white newspaper illustration
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Number of public school students in 1st grade and Fossil fuel use in El Salvador together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a colorful classroom in El Salvador, a group of 1st grade students is sitting attentively at their desks, with bright drawings and educational posters adorning the walls. Meanwhile, outside the classroom, a line of school buses runs on fossil fuel, taking students to and from school.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A black-and-white newspaper illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a colorful classroom in El Salvador, a group of 1st grade students is sitting attentively at their desks, with bright drawings and educational posters adorning the walls. Meanwhile, outside the classroom, a line of school buses runs on fossil fuel, taking students to and from school. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a black-and-white newspaper illustration of a lively classroom in El Salvador. Show a group of 1st grade students sitting at their desks, absorbed in learning, with colorful drawings and educational posters decorating the classroom walls. Meanwhile, outside the window, depict a line of school buses emitting fossil fuel exhaust as they transport students to and from school. The contrast between the vibrant interior and the pollution outside should be evident in the illustration.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Number of public school students in 1st grade positively influenced Fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
First Grade Fossil Fiasco: A Study of the Connection Between Student Enrollment and Fuel Consumption in El Salvador The Journal of Educational Archaeology and Environmental Economics Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 1st grade and Fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.
Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7790569 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
First Grade Fossil Fiasco: A Study of the Connection Between Student Enrollment and Fuel Consumption in El Salvador
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Combining data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this unlikely pairing, seeking to uncover any meaningful correlation. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.7790569 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021. While the causality of this relationship remains uncertain, our results suggest that there may be more to the dynamics of fossil fuel use in El Salvador than mere coincidence. Our study is a light-hearted reminder that, in the world of statistics, even the most unexpected correlations can fuel our curiosity and spark new avenues of investigation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 1st grade and Fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
First Grade Fossil Fiasco: A Study of the Connection Between Student Enrollment and Fuel Consumption in El Salvador
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Combining data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this unlikely pairing, seeking to uncover any meaningful correlation. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.7790569 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021. While the causality of this relationship remains uncertain, our results suggest that there may be more to the dynamics of fossil fuel use in El Salvador than mere coincidence. Our study is a light-hearted reminder that, in the world of statistics, even the most unexpected correlations can fuel our curiosity and spark new avenues of investigation.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, buckle up and get ready to embark on a statistical rollercoaster ride through the seemingly disparate worlds of first-grade enrollment and fossil fuel consumption in El Salvador. When we first stumbled upon the idea of investigating this peculiar connection, we couldn't help but scratch our heads and wonder if there was a touch of madness to our methods. After all, what could possibly link the innocent chatter of youngsters in their early school years to the burning of fossil fuels in a small Central American country? But as they say, "where there's a correlation, there's a causation" – or was it the other way around?
The title of this research paper alone might prompt a few raised eyebrows and a fair share of good-natured chuckling. "First Grade Fossil Fiasco" – now that's a mouthful that even the most seasoned academic could appreciate. We assure you, dear readers, that our intentions are as serious as a penguin in a tuxedo. Our aim is to shine a light on this unconventional association and see if there's more than meets the eye, or if it's just a statistical fluke that's gone the length.
The abstract gives you a saucy taste of what's to come in this paper. We ventured into the labyrinth of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, armed with nothing but our wits and a warehouse of calculators. Lo and behold, our arduous efforts rewarded us with a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.7790569, and a p-value that would make any statistician weak at the knees.
So, grab your thinking caps and brace yourselves for a journey through the unexpected, the quirky, and the downright baffling. In the realm of statistics, where the wild things are, we're about to venture into uncharted territory where first graders and fossil fuels collide in the most improbable of ways.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 1st grade and Fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
First Grade Fossil Fiasco: A Study of the Connection Between Student Enrollment and Fuel Consumption in El Salvador
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Combining data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this unlikely pairing, seeking to uncover any meaningful correlation. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.7790569 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021. While the causality of this relationship remains uncertain, our results suggest that there may be more to the dynamics of fossil fuel use in El Salvador than mere coincidence. Our study is a light-hearted reminder that, in the world of statistics, even the most unexpected correlations can fuel our curiosity and spark new avenues of investigation.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, buckle up and get ready to embark on a statistical rollercoaster ride through the seemingly disparate worlds of first-grade enrollment and fossil fuel consumption in El Salvador. When we first stumbled upon the idea of investigating this peculiar connection, we couldn't help but scratch our heads and wonder if there was a touch of madness to our methods. After all, what could possibly link the innocent chatter of youngsters in their early school years to the burning of fossil fuels in a small Central American country? But as they say, "where there's a correlation, there's a causation" – or was it the other way around?
The title of this research paper alone might prompt a few raised eyebrows and a fair share of good-natured chuckling. "First Grade Fossil Fiasco" – now that's a mouthful that even the most seasoned academic could appreciate. We assure you, dear readers, that our intentions are as serious as a penguin in a tuxedo. Our aim is to shine a light on this unconventional association and see if there's more than meets the eye, or if it's just a statistical fluke that's gone the length.
The abstract gives you a saucy taste of what's to come in this paper. We ventured into the labyrinth of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, armed with nothing but our wits and a warehouse of calculators. Lo and behold, our arduous efforts rewarded us with a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.7790569, and a p-value that would make any statistician weak at the knees.
So, grab your thinking caps and brace yourselves for a journey through the unexpected, the quirky, and the downright baffling. In the realm of statistics, where the wild things are, we're about to venture into uncharted territory where first graders and fossil fuels collide in the most improbable of ways.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between the number of first-grade students in public schools and fossil fuel use in El Salvador may seem like an odd pairing, but as John Smith et al. noted in their seminal work "Educational Trends and Environmental Impacts," unexpected correlations can often reveal underlying dynamics that are worthy of exploration. In their study, Smith et al. presented the idea that the behavior of young students could potentially influence broader environmental patterns, setting the stage for our investigation into the intersecting realms of academia and fossil fuels.
Building upon this foundation, Jane Doe's research in "Economic Implications of Education and Energy Consumption" emphasizes the need to consider unconventional variables in the analysis of energy usage. Doe's work cast a spotlight on the unexplored potential of educational factors in shaping societal energy patterns, serving as a catalyst for our inquiry into the peculiar nexus of first-grade enrollment and fuel consumption.
While the literature on this specific connection may be limited, it is worth noting the broader context of environmental and educational interactions. In "The Economics of Energy and Education," Adam Jones intricately wove together strands of energy economics and educational policy, suggesting an intertwined relationship that extends far beyond conventional wisdom. Jones's theoretical framework laid the groundwork for our investigation, urging us to venture beyond the well-trodden paths of statistical analysis.
As we delve further into the literature, we dare to take a lighthearted detour into the world of non-fiction books that orbit the realms of education and energy. "Energy: A Human History" by Richard Rhodes and "Teach Like Your Hair's on Fire" by Rafe Esquith serve as beacons of knowledge in the sea of data and statistics, offering insights into the human dimension of energy use and the transformative power of education, no matter how fiery the situation.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, the profound allegories of Ursula K. Le Guin's "The Dispossessed" and Paolo Bacigalupi's "The Water Knife" enrich our contemplation of societal structures and resource allocation, prompting us to consider the intricate web of influences that shape energy policies and educational landscapes.
In a surprising twist, animated characters from beloved children's shows such as "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" and "Magic School Bus" beckon us to revisit the fundamental principles of environmental stewardship and scientific exploration. While we may not have Ms. Frizzle's magical bus at our disposal, we embark on our research journey with a similar sense of wonder and enthusiasm, hoping to uncover the unexpected magic that lies at the intersection of first-grade fervor and fossil fuel fascination.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 1st grade and Fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1990 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
First Grade Fossil Fiasco: A Study of the Connection Between Student Enrollment and Fuel Consumption in El Salvador
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Combining data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this unlikely pairing, seeking to uncover any meaningful correlation. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.7790569 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021. While the causality of this relationship remains uncertain, our results suggest that there may be more to the dynamics of fossil fuel use in El Salvador than mere coincidence. Our study is a light-hearted reminder that, in the world of statistics, even the most unexpected correlations can fuel our curiosity and spark new avenues of investigation.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, buckle up and get ready to embark on a statistical rollercoaster ride through the seemingly disparate worlds of first-grade enrollment and fossil fuel consumption in El Salvador. When we first stumbled upon the idea of investigating this peculiar connection, we couldn't help but scratch our heads and wonder if there was a touch of madness to our methods. After all, what could possibly link the innocent chatter of youngsters in their early school years to the burning of fossil fuels in a small Central American country? But as they say, "where there's a correlation, there's a causation" – or was it the other way around?
The title of this research paper alone might prompt a few raised eyebrows and a fair share of good-natured chuckling. "First Grade Fossil Fiasco" – now that's a mouthful that even the most seasoned academic could appreciate. We assure you, dear readers, that our intentions are as serious as a penguin in a tuxedo. Our aim is to shine a light on this unconventional association and see if there's more than meets the eye, or if it's just a statistical fluke that's gone the length.
The abstract gives you a saucy taste of what's to come in this paper. We ventured into the labyrinth of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, armed with nothing but our wits and a warehouse of calculators. Lo and behold, our arduous efforts rewarded us with a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.7790569, and a p-value that would make any statistician weak at the knees.
So, grab your thinking caps and brace yourselves for a journey through the unexpected, the quirky, and the downright baffling. In the realm of statistics, where the wild things are, we're about to venture into uncharted territory where first graders and fossil fuels collide in the most improbable of ways.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unravel the enigmatic connection between the number of first-grade public school students and fossil fuel use in El Salvador, our research team undertook a rollicking rollercoaster ride through the fields of data collection, manipulation, and analysis. We harnessed the formidable power of the internet, bravely scouring the digital plains for data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration. Armed with nothing but our trusty spreadsheets and a surplus of caffeinated beverages, we embarked on a cumbersome yet exhilarating journey through the years 1990 to 2021.
Our first port of call was the winding corridors of the National Center for Education Statistics, where we delved into the colorful tapestry of first-grade student enrollment figures. With a click here and a scroll there, we gathered a bountiful harvest of data representing the ebb and flow of youthful minds entering the hallowed halls of El Salvadorian public schools. Meanwhile, our adventurous spirit led us to the hallowed archives of the Energy Information Administration, where the alluring scent of fossil fuel consumption data beckoned us forth. Like intrepid explorers of statistical treasures, we mined these databases for nuggets of knowledge on the consumption of fossil fuels by our Salvadorian comrades.
Having amassed this veritable treasure trove of data, we huddled together in our research den, surrounded by walls adorned with equations and the steady hum of computing machinery. Our analysis began with the meticulous scrutiny of the temporal patterns within the datasets, akin to deciphering the rhythmic beats of a complex symphony. We engaged in a tango of statistical tests, including Pearson correlation coefficients and their towering confidence intervals, to discern any potential link between first-grade student enrollment and fossil fuel use.
Our pursuit was not devoid of challenges and pratfalls; we encountered the occasional data quirk, akin to a mischievous gremlin prancing through our numerical abode. Yet, armed with the potent elixir of statistical wizardry and the wisdom of our academic elders, we steered through these tempestuous waters with the grace of a swan navigating a stormy lake.
Ultimately, after weathering many a statistical squall, our analysis revealed a surprising positive correlation coefficient of 0.7790569, accompanied by a p-value that shimmered with significance. This improbable link between innocent young scholars and the fiery embrace of fossil fuels left us both baffled and exhilarated, reminding us that in the realm of statistics, the unexpected is often the most illuminating.
In conclusion, our methodological odyssey through the labyrinthine landscape of data collection and analysis provided us with a tantalizing glimpse into the enigmatic dance of first-grade enrollment and fossil fuel consumption in El Salvador, reminding us that in the world of statistics, even the most whimsical of correlations can fuel our curiosity and lead us to surprising revelations.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 1st grade and Fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Energy Information Administration .
For the time period 1990 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7790569, r-squared of 0.6069296, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
First Grade Fossil Fiasco: A Study of the Connection Between Student Enrollment and Fuel Consumption in El Salvador
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Combining data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this unlikely pairing, seeking to uncover any meaningful correlation. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.7790569 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021. While the causality of this relationship remains uncertain, our results suggest that there may be more to the dynamics of fossil fuel use in El Salvador than mere coincidence. Our study is a light-hearted reminder that, in the world of statistics, even the most unexpected correlations can fuel our curiosity and spark new avenues of investigation.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen, buckle up and get ready to embark on a statistical rollercoaster ride through the seemingly disparate worlds of first-grade enrollment and fossil fuel consumption in El Salvador. When we first stumbled upon the idea of investigating this peculiar connection, we couldn't help but scratch our heads and wonder if there was a touch of madness to our methods. After all, what could possibly link the innocent chatter of youngsters in their early school years to the burning of fossil fuels in a small Central American country? But as they say, "where there's a correlation, there's a causation" – or was it the other way around?
The title of this research paper alone might prompt a few raised eyebrows and a fair share of good-natured chuckling. "First Grade Fossil Fiasco" – now that's a mouthful that even the most seasoned academic could appreciate. We assure you, dear readers, that our intentions are as serious as a penguin in a tuxedo. Our aim is to shine a light on this unconventional association and see if there's more than meets the eye, or if it's just a statistical fluke that's gone the length.
The abstract gives you a saucy taste of what's to come in this paper. We ventured into the labyrinth of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, armed with nothing but our wits and a warehouse of calculators. Lo and behold, our arduous efforts rewarded us with a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.7790569, and a p-value that would make any statistician weak at the knees.
So, grab your thinking caps and brace yourselves for a journey through the unexpected, the quirky, and the downright baffling. In the realm of statistics, where the wild things are, we're about to venture into uncharted territory where first graders and fossil fuels collide in the most improbable of ways.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our unlikely investigation into the correlation between the number of public school students in 1st grade and fossil fuel use in El Salvador have left us both amused and astonished. Our analysis covering the years 1990 to 2021 yielded a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7790569, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated factors. It's as if the first graders are whispering secrets to the fossil fuels, and in turn, the fuels are igniting the curiosity of the students!
The R-squared value of 0.6069296 further solidifies the tightness of the connection, suggesting that over 60% of the variation in fossil fuel use can be explained by changes in first-grade enrollment. If this were a school report card, these variables would undoubtedly be at the top of the class, earning gold stars for their outstanding teamwork.
To put it in simple terms, our findings imply that as the number of first graders in El Salvador increases, so too does the consumption of fossil fuels. It's a correlation that defies convention and tickles the imagination. It's as if the children's laughter propels the fossil fuel consumption, painting a portrait of unexpected symbiosis.
The p-value of less than 0.01 serves as the cherry on top of this statistical sundae, providing overwhelming evidence to reject the null hypothesis and affirming that this relationship is no mere statistical fluke. It seems that the statistical gods were in a mischievous mood when they decided to intertwine these two variables in such a captivating dance.
To illustrate the strength of this extraordinary correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly showcases the unmistakable, uphill trend between first-grade enrollment and fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Uniting these two diverse elements under the umbrella of statistical significance has unveiled a striking partnership that demands further exploration and contemplation.
In conclusion, our research raises more questions than answers, but isn't that the beauty of statistical inquiry? Our findings remind us that within the realm of data analysis, even the most unexpected pairings can yield fascinating insights, and that sometimes, statistical relationships can be as whimsical and capricious as a game of musical chairs.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 1st grade and Fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
First Grade Fossil Fiasco: A Study of the Connection Between Student Enrollment and Fuel Consumption in El Salvador
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Combining data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this unlikely pairing, seeking to uncover any meaningful correlation. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.7790569 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021. While the causality of this relationship remains uncertain, our results suggest that there may be more to the dynamics of fossil fuel use in El Salvador than mere coincidence. Our study is a light-hearted reminder that, in the world of statistics, even the most unexpected correlations can fuel our curiosity and spark new avenues of investigation.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between the number of first-grade students in public schools and fossil fuel use in El Salvador may seem like an odd pairing, but as John Smith et al. noted in their seminal work "Educational Trends and Environmental Impacts," unexpected correlations can often reveal underlying dynamics that are worthy of exploration. In their study, Smith et al. presented the idea that the behavior of young students could potentially influence broader environmental patterns, setting the stage for our investigation into the intersecting realms of academia and fossil fuels.
Building upon this foundation, Jane Doe's research in "Economic Implications of Education and Energy Consumption" emphasizes the need to consider unconventional variables in the analysis of energy usage. Doe's work cast a spotlight on the unexplored potential of educational factors in shaping societal energy patterns, serving as a catalyst for our inquiry into the peculiar nexus of first-grade enrollment and fuel consumption.
While the literature on this specific connection may be limited, it is worth noting the broader context of environmental and educational interactions. In "The Economics of Energy and Education," Adam Jones intricately wove together strands of energy economics and educational policy, suggesting an intertwined relationship that extends far beyond conventional wisdom. Jones's theoretical framework laid the groundwork for our investigation, urging us to venture beyond the well-trodden paths of statistical analysis.
As we delve further into the literature, we dare to take a lighthearted detour into the world of non-fiction books that orbit the realms of education and energy. "Energy: A Human History" by Richard Rhodes and "Teach Like Your Hair's on Fire" by Rafe Esquith serve as beacons of knowledge in the sea of data and statistics, offering insights into the human dimension of energy use and the transformative power of education, no matter how fiery the situation.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, the profound allegories of Ursula K. Le Guin's "The Dispossessed" and Paolo Bacigalupi's "The Water Knife" enrich our contemplation of societal structures and resource allocation, prompting us to consider the intricate web of influences that shape energy policies and educational landscapes.
In a surprising twist, animated characters from beloved children's shows such as "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" and "Magic School Bus" beckon us to revisit the fundamental principles of environmental stewardship and scientific exploration. While we may not have Ms. Frizzle's magical bus at our disposal, we embark on our research journey with a similar sense of wonder and enthusiasm, hoping to uncover the unexpected magic that lies at the intersection of first-grade fervor and fossil fuel fascination.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our unlikely investigation into the correlation between the number of public school students in 1st grade and fossil fuel use in El Salvador have left us both amused and astonished. Our analysis covering the years 1990 to 2021 yielded a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7790569, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated factors. It's as if the first graders are whispering secrets to the fossil fuels, and in turn, the fuels are igniting the curiosity of the students!
The R-squared value of 0.6069296 further solidifies the tightness of the connection, suggesting that over 60% of the variation in fossil fuel use can be explained by changes in first-grade enrollment. If this were a school report card, these variables would undoubtedly be at the top of the class, earning gold stars for their outstanding teamwork.
To put it in simple terms, our findings imply that as the number of first graders in El Salvador increases, so too does the consumption of fossil fuels. It's a correlation that defies convention and tickles the imagination. It's as if the children's laughter propels the fossil fuel consumption, painting a portrait of unexpected symbiosis.
The p-value of less than 0.01 serves as the cherry on top of this statistical sundae, providing overwhelming evidence to reject the null hypothesis and affirming that this relationship is no mere statistical fluke. It seems that the statistical gods were in a mischievous mood when they decided to intertwine these two variables in such a captivating dance.
To illustrate the strength of this extraordinary correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly showcases the unmistakable, uphill trend between first-grade enrollment and fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Uniting these two diverse elements under the umbrella of statistical significance has unveiled a striking partnership that demands further exploration and contemplation.
In conclusion, our research raises more questions than answers, but isn't that the beauty of statistical inquiry? Our findings remind us that within the realm of data analysis, even the most unexpected pairings can yield fascinating insights, and that sometimes, statistical relationships can be as whimsical and capricious as a game of musical chairs.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our investigation into the surprising connection between the number of first-grade students in public schools and fossil fuel use in El Salvador has revealed an unexpected alliance that defies conventional wisdom. While the notion of first graders influencing the consumption of fossil fuels may initially evoke playful skepticism, our robust correlation coefficient of 0.7790569 lends statistical weight to this unorthodox relationship. It's as if the innocence of the classroom is whispering secrets to the industrial machinery, igniting a whimsical dance of numbers that captivates the imagination.
Our findings not only echo the insightful musings of John Smith et al. and Jane Doe, who paved the way for the exploration of unconventional correlations, but also serve as a whimsical reminder of the boundless potential for statistical serendipity. The unexpected puppet mastery of first-grade enrollment over fossil fuel use raises questions about the underlying dynamics at play, inviting further inquiry into the symbiotic intertwining of education and energy on a societal scale.
Building upon the theoretical groundwork laid by Adam Jones, in which the intricate relationship between energy economics and educational policy was probed, our results breathe life into the uncharted territories of statistical whimsy. From the lighthearted detours into non-fiction and fiction realms that orbit the educational and energy spheres, our journey of investigation has brought an element of playfulness to the otherwise serious discourse of statistical analysis, reminding us that within the realm of data, there is room for both scholarly rigor and whimsical curiosity.
The unmistakable uphill trend depicted in our scatterplot not only showcases the compelling partnership between first-grade enrollment and fossil fuel use but also serves as a visual testament to the captivating nature of statistical discovery. It's as if the data points are engaged in an intricate waltz, with each step revealing a new layer of the enigmatic relationship that transcends traditional statistical paradigms.
Our research grants credence to the notion that statistical relationships can transcend the ordinary and border on the whimsical, challenging us to embrace the unexpected and approach data analysis with a sense of wonder. As we navigate these uncharted statistical waters, our findings beckon fellow researchers to explore the captivating dance of numbers and uncover the enchanting narratives that lurk beneath the surface of seemingly incongruous correlations. After all, in the realm of statistics, even the most surprising pairings can lead to meaningful insights, reminding us that statistical inquiry is simultaneously a serious pursuit and a whimsical adventure.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 1st grade and Fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
First Grade Fossil Fiasco: A Study of the Connection Between Student Enrollment and Fuel Consumption in El Salvador
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Combining data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this unlikely pairing, seeking to uncover any meaningful correlation. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.7790569 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021. While the causality of this relationship remains uncertain, our results suggest that there may be more to the dynamics of fossil fuel use in El Salvador than mere coincidence. Our study is a light-hearted reminder that, in the world of statistics, even the most unexpected correlations can fuel our curiosity and spark new avenues of investigation.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, buckle up and get ready to embark on a statistical rollercoaster ride through the seemingly disparate worlds of first-grade enrollment and fossil fuel consumption in El Salvador. When we first stumbled upon the idea of investigating this peculiar connection, we couldn't help but scratch our heads and wonder if there was a touch of madness to our methods. After all, what could possibly link the innocent chatter of youngsters in their early school years to the burning of fossil fuels in a small Central American country? But as they say, "where there's a correlation, there's a causation" – or was it the other way around?
The title of this research paper alone might prompt a few raised eyebrows and a fair share of good-natured chuckling. "First Grade Fossil Fiasco" – now that's a mouthful that even the most seasoned academic could appreciate. We assure you, dear readers, that our intentions are as serious as a penguin in a tuxedo. Our aim is to shine a light on this unconventional association and see if there's more than meets the eye, or if it's just a statistical fluke that's gone the length.
The abstract gives you a saucy taste of what's to come in this paper. We ventured into the labyrinth of data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, armed with nothing but our wits and a warehouse of calculators. Lo and behold, our arduous efforts rewarded us with a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.7790569, and a p-value that would make any statistician weak at the knees.
So, grab your thinking caps and brace yourselves for a journey through the unexpected, the quirky, and the downright baffling. In the realm of statistics, where the wild things are, we're about to venture into uncharted territory where first graders and fossil fuels collide in the most improbable of ways.
[[RESULTS]]
The results of our unlikely investigation into the correlation between the number of public school students in 1st grade and fossil fuel use in El Salvador have left us both amused and astonished. Our analysis covering the years 1990 to 2021 yielded a robust correlation coefficient of 0.7790569, indicating a remarkably strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated factors. It's as if the first graders are whispering secrets to the fossil fuels, and in turn, the fuels are igniting the curiosity of the students!
The R-squared value of 0.6069296 further solidifies the tightness of the connection, suggesting that over 60% of the variation in fossil fuel use can be explained by changes in first-grade enrollment. If this were a school report card, these variables would undoubtedly be at the top of the class, earning gold stars for their outstanding teamwork.
To put it in simple terms, our findings imply that as the number of first graders in El Salvador increases, so too does the consumption of fossil fuels. It's a correlation that defies convention and tickles the imagination. It's as if the children's laughter propels the fossil fuel consumption, painting a portrait of unexpected symbiosis.
The p-value of less than 0.01 serves as the cherry on top of this statistical sundae, providing overwhelming evidence to reject the null hypothesis and affirming that this relationship is no mere statistical fluke. It seems that the statistical gods were in a mischievous mood when they decided to intertwine these two variables in such a captivating dance.
To illustrate the strength of this extraordinary correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that vividly showcases the unmistakable, uphill trend between first-grade enrollment and fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Uniting these two diverse elements under the umbrella of statistical significance has unveiled a striking partnership that demands further exploration and contemplation.
In conclusion, our research raises more questions than answers, but isn't that the beauty of statistical inquiry? Our findings remind us that within the realm of data analysis, even the most unexpected pairings can yield fascinating insights, and that sometimes, statistical relationships can be as whimsical and capricious as a game of musical chairs.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has unveiled a surprising and robust connection between the number of first-grade students in El Salvador and the consumption of fossil fuels. It seems that as the youthful chatter and pitter-patter of tiny feet grow in the classrooms, so too does the appetite for fossil fuels in this small Central American nation. One could say that the exuberance of the first graders is in perfect harmony with the combustion of fossil fuels, creating a symphony of statistical significance.
As we reflect on the unusual yet compelling correlation coefficient of 0.7790569, we can't help but marvel at the unexpected dance of data that has unfolded before our eyes. It's as if the first graders are whispering secrets to the fossil fuels, and in turn, the fuels are igniting the curiosity of the students! The R-squared value of 0.6069296 further solidifies the notion that these two variables are in cahoots, with over 60% of the variation in fossil fuel use being accounted for by changes in first-grade enrollment. It's a partnership that deserves recognition, as if these variables earned themselves a spot in the statistical hall of fame.
Our findings, supported by a p-value of less than 0.01, present compelling evidence that this correlation is no laughing matter. Well, maybe a little bit of laughter is warranted, considering the sheer whimsy of this statistical saga. The unexpected nature of this connection stands as a testament to the delightful unpredictability of statistical analysis.
Hence, in the spirit of academic curiosity and statistical wit, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. It seems the first-grade fossil fiasco has made its mark in the annals of statistical oddities, leaving us with a sense of wonder and a newfound appreciation for the quirkiness of statistical relationships. As the saying goes, "correlation does not imply causation, but it sure does make for an amusing statistical yarn."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited First Grade Fossil Fiasco: A Study of the Connection Between Student Enrollment and Fuel Consumption in El Salvador. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Educational Archaeology and Environmental Economics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited First Grade Fossil Fiasco: A Study of the Connection Between Student Enrollment and Fuel Consumption in El Salvador. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Quirky Geoscience Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled First Grade Fossil Fiasco: A Study of the Connection Between Student Enrollment and Fuel Consumption in El Salvador with an abstract of In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the number of public school students in 1st grade and fossil fuel use in El Salvador. Combining data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into this unlikely pairing, seeking to uncover any meaningful correlation. Our findings reveal a surprisingly strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.7790569 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 1990 to 2021. While the causality of this relationship remains uncertain, our results suggest that there may be more to the dynamics of fossil fuel use in El Salvador than mere coincidence. Our study is a light-hearted reminder that, in the world of statistics, even the most unexpected correlations can fuel our curiosity and spark new avenues of investigation.
ChatGPT:
public school students, 1st grade enrollment, fossil fuel consumption, El Salvador, correlation, National Center for Education Statistics, Energy Information Administration, positive correlation coefficient, causality, dynamics of fossil fuel use, statistical analysis
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Number of public school students in 1st gradeDetailed data title: 1st grade enrollment in public elementary and secondary schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Number of public school students in 1st grade
Fossil fuel use in El Salvador
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in El Salvador in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in El Salvador
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.6069296 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 60.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Fossil fuel use in El Salvador) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Number of public school students in 1st grade) over the 32 years from 1990 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.5E-7. 0.0000001502583113361621400000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.78 in 1.5E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 6,655,206 random variables You don't actually need 6 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 31 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 31 because we have two variables measured over a period of 32 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.59, 0.89 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
Number of public school students in 1st grade (Students) | 3499430 | 3556280 | 3541710 | 3529070 | 3593380 | 3670900 | 3770420 | 3754590 | 3727160 | 3684120 | 3635660 | 3614070 | 3593840 | 3612510 | 3663000 | 3690850 | 3751140 | 3750070 | 3708480 | 3728770 | 3753950 | 3772640 | 3823600 | 3884820 | 3863490 | 3768140 | 3693850 | 3667170 | 3640650 | 3646680 | 3522210 | 3457730 |
Fossil fuel use in El Salvador (Billion kWh) | 0.159 | 0.648 | 0.633 | 0.857 | 1.232 | 1.358 | 1.02 | 1.604 | 1.688 | 1.319 | 1.757 | 1.653 | 1.83 | 1.747 | 1.9036 | 1.9094 | 2.358 | 2.463 | 2.262 | 2.592 | 2.092 | 2.255 | 2.48 | 2.481 | 2.508 | 2.526 | 2.505 | 1.39934 | 1.19997 | 1.75595 | 0.977059 | 1.03959 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3499430,3556280,3541710,3529070,3593380,3670900,3770420,3754590,3727160,3684120,3635660,3614070,3593840,3612510,3663000,3690850,3751140,3750070,3708480,3728770,3753950,3772640,3823600,3884820,3863490,3768140,3693850,3667170,3640650,3646680,3522210,3457730,])
array_2 = np.array([0.159,0.648,0.633,0.857,1.232,1.358,1.02,1.604,1.688,1.319,1.757,1.653,1.83,1.747,1.9036,1.9094,2.358,2.463,2.262,2.592,2.092,2.255,2.48,2.481,2.508,2.526,2.505,1.39934,1.19997,1.75595,0.977059,1.03959,])
array_1_name = "Number of public school students in 1st grade"
array_2_name = "Fossil fuel use in El Salvador"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Number of public school students in 1st grade
- Line chart for only Fossil fuel use in El Salvador
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: First Grade Fossil Fiasco: A Study of the Connection Between Student Enrollment and Fuel Consumption in El Salvador
Your dedication to rating warms my heart!
Correlation ID: 1841 · Black Variable ID: 1298 · Red Variable ID: 23646