Report an error
Number of public school students in 1st grade correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of Public Library Members in the UK | r=0.94 | 12yrs | Yes! |
The number of insurance claims adjusters in Illinois | r=0.9 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Fossil fuel use in El Salvador | r=0.78 | 32yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'how to fake your own death' | r=0.67 | 19yrs | No |
The number of private detectives in Louisiana | r=-0.84 | 20yrs | No |
Number of public school students in 1st grade also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)