about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,839 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Associates degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and the second variable is Ross Stores' stock price (ROST).  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people became knowledgeable about social and historical trends, they developed a heightened appreciation for the fashion at Ross Stores, leading to increased demand and ultimately driving up the stock price. It's like the Enlightenment, but with discounted brand-name clothing!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s depicting a group of happy students in graduation gowns holding their Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History. The students are portrayed checking their smartphones to see the rising stock price of Ross Stores, smiling with excitement as they see the positive trend. The illustration should capture the essence of the 1960s comic style while conveying the joy and optimism of the students as they embark on their new journey. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Associates degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and Ross Stores' stock price. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Glitch art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Cute cartoon Voxel art An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Associates degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and Ross Stores' stock price together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A group of happy students in graduation gowns holding their Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History while checking their smartphones to see the rising stock price of Ross Stores, smiling with excitement as they see the positive trend.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: A group of happy students in graduation gowns holding their Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History while checking their smartphones to see the rising stock price of Ross Stores, smiling with excitement as they see the positive trend. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s depicting a group of happy students in graduation gowns holding their Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History. The students are portrayed checking their smartphones to see the rising stock price of Ross Stores, smiling with excitement as they see the positive trend. The illustration should capture the essence of the 1960s comic style while conveying the joy and optimism of the students as they embark on their new journey.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Associates degrees awarded in Social sciences and history caused Ross Stores' stock price (ROST) to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Unearthing the Root Causes: Exploring the Relationship Between Associates Degrees in Social Sciences and History and Ross Stores' Stock Price

The Journal of Retail Analysis and Liberal Arts Integration

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and Ross Stores' stock price (ROST). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9850862 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Unearthing the Root Causes: Exploring the Relationship Between Associates Degrees in Social Sciences and History and Ross Stores' Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
The link between educational achievements and stock market movements has been a topic of both intrigue and skepticism. In this study, we meticulously scrutinize the connection between the conferral of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST), a prominent player in the retail industry. Against the backdrop of theoretical models, anecdotal evidence, and a smattering of humorous stock market puns, we utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a ten-year analysis spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9850862, with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, offering nettlesome insights into the dynamic interplay between academic pursuits and market forces. This research not only sheds light on an obscure nexus but also cautions against underestimating the influence of erstwhile history buffs and social science scholars on the capricious realm of stock prices.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and Ross Stores' stock price (ROST). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unearthing the Root Causes: Exploring the Relationship Between Associates Degrees in Social Sciences and History and Ross Stores' Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
The link between educational achievements and stock market movements has been a topic of both intrigue and skepticism. In this study, we meticulously scrutinize the connection between the conferral of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST), a prominent player in the retail industry. Against the backdrop of theoretical models, anecdotal evidence, and a smattering of humorous stock market puns, we utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a ten-year analysis spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9850862, with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, offering nettlesome insights into the dynamic interplay between academic pursuits and market forces. This research not only sheds light on an obscure nexus but also cautions against underestimating the influence of erstwhile history buffs and social science scholars on the capricious realm of stock prices.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intertwining relationship between academic achievements and stock market trends has long piqued the curiosity of scholars and financial analysts alike. The quest to discern the nuanced connections between seemingly disparate realms such as the conferral of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST) has, thus far, yielded a bountiful crop of theories and conjectures. It is against this backdrop of "serious" academia and financial jargon that we embark upon our investigation, armed with statistical measures and a zest for uncovering the underlying fabric of this unlikely correlation.

While some may view the pursuit of such associations as a quixotic endeavor, we find ourselves irresistibly drawn to the tantalizing prospect of unearthing potential causative links, all while navigating the labyrinthine pathways of stock market fluctuations and academic pursuits. Indeed, our endeavor encapsulates both the whimsical fascination of probing into unconventional relationships and the earnest rigor of empirical research.

The premise of this study stands on the precipice of conventional wisdom, daring to thrust itself into the uncharted territories of academic disciplines and the volatility of stock markets. By delving deep into the annals of the National Center for Education Statistics and harnessing the wealth of market data from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we endeavor to unveil the covert liaisons between the conferral of Associates degrees in the seemingly unrelated spheres of Social Sciences and History and the stock price movements of Ross Stores (ROST).

As we embark on this expedition, we acknowledge that our pursuit intertwines the mundane with the mystique, melding academic data with market indices, and weaving anecdotes with statistical significance. With a measured dose of skepticism and a hint of whimsy, we brace ourselves for the multifaceted journey of unraveling the correlation – or cause célèbre, if you will – between the pursuits of history buffs and social science savants and the capricious dance of a retail giant's stock price.

In the subsequent sections of this paper, we aim to navigate the intricate web of data analysis while peppering our discourse with witticisms, puns, and unanticipated whimsies, all in the noble pursuit of shedding light on this improbable and intriguing nexus. Join us, if you will, as we embark on this academic odyssey, where the laughter of history and the gravity of stock prices intermingle in our quest to uncover the underlying roots of this hitherto overlooked link.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and Ross Stores' stock price (ROST). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unearthing the Root Causes: Exploring the Relationship Between Associates Degrees in Social Sciences and History and Ross Stores' Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
The link between educational achievements and stock market movements has been a topic of both intrigue and skepticism. In this study, we meticulously scrutinize the connection between the conferral of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST), a prominent player in the retail industry. Against the backdrop of theoretical models, anecdotal evidence, and a smattering of humorous stock market puns, we utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a ten-year analysis spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9850862, with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, offering nettlesome insights into the dynamic interplay between academic pursuits and market forces. This research not only sheds light on an obscure nexus but also cautions against underestimating the influence of erstwhile history buffs and social science scholars on the capricious realm of stock prices.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwining relationship between academic achievements and stock market trends has long piqued the curiosity of scholars and financial analysts alike. The quest to discern the nuanced connections between seemingly disparate realms such as the conferral of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST) has, thus far, yielded a bountiful crop of theories and conjectures. It is against this backdrop of "serious" academia and financial jargon that we embark upon our investigation, armed with statistical measures and a zest for uncovering the underlying fabric of this unlikely correlation.
While some may view the pursuit of such associations as a quixotic endeavor, we find ourselves irresistibly drawn to the tantalizing prospect of unearthing potential causative links, all while navigating the labyrinthine pathways of stock market fluctuations and academic pursuits. Indeed, our endeavor encapsulates both the whimsical fascination of probing into unconventional relationships and the earnest rigor of empirical research.
The premise of this study stands on the precipice of conventional wisdom, daring to thrust itself into the uncharted territories of academic disciplines and the volatility of stock markets. By delving deep into the annals of the National Center for Education Statistics and harnessing the wealth of market data from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we endeavor to unveil the covert liaisons between the conferral of Associates degrees in the seemingly unrelated spheres of Social Sciences and History and the stock price movements of Ross Stores (ROST).
As we embark on this expedition, we acknowledge that our pursuit intertwines the mundane with the mystique, melding academic data with market indices, and weaving anecdotes with statistical significance. With a measured dose of skepticism and a hint of whimsy, we brace ourselves for the multifaceted journey of unraveling the correlation – or cause célèbre, if you will – between the pursuits of history buffs and social science savants and the capricious dance of a retail giant's stock price.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we aim to navigate the intricate web of data analysis while peppering our discourse with witticisms, puns, and unanticipated whimsies, all in the noble pursuit of shedding light on this improbable and intriguing nexus. Join us, if you will, as we embark on this academic odyssey, where the laughter of history and the gravity of stock prices intermingle in our quest to uncover the underlying roots of this hitherto overlooked link.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The current state of scholarship regarding the correlation between academic achievements and stock market movements provides a rich tapestry of both serious inquiry and peculiar conjectures. Smith et al. (2018) delved into the esoteric realm of educational influences on market dynamics, offering a comprehensive analysis of the link between humanities degrees and retail stock performance. However, as we plunge deeper into this nexus, we encounter not only the solemn tomes of financial analysis but also a smattering of less conventional sources that have dared to ponder the elusive connections.

In "The History of Market Trends: An In-Depth Analysis" by Doe (2015), the author explores the unsuspected influences of historical academic pursuits on the ebb and flow of stock prices. This work lays the groundwork for our own endeavor, inviting us to contemplate the intriguing interplay between history and market forces with a blend of skepticism and open-minded speculation. Furthermore, Jones et al. (2020) probed the uncharted territories of academic disciplines and stock market volatility, peppering their discourse with witticisms and puns in an attempt to decipher the confounding relationship between the pursuit of knowledge and the unpredictability of market movements.

Venturing into the realm of non-fiction literature, works such as "The Wealth of Nations" by Adam Smith and "A Random Walk Down Wall Street" by Burton Malkiel beckon us to contemplate the subtle undercurrents that may tie the ostensibly divergent worlds of academia and stock markets. Meanwhile, fictitious tomes such as "The Mystery of the Missing Stock Prices" by Agatha Christie and "The Quirks of Quants: A Tale of Financial Forecasting" by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle provide a whimsical respite, albeit at the fringes of relevance, as we navigate the labyrinthine pathways of historical pursuits and financial caprices.

Drawing inspiration from unorthodox sources, the board game "Stock Market Monopoly" inadvertently perpetuates the myth of stock market mastery, while the blithe randomness of "Chutes and Ladders: Wall Street Edition" humorously underscores the serendipitous nature of market movements, albeit in a purely ludic context. These unconventional musings inform our approach to our investigation, subtly reminding us of the whimsical nature of our scholarly pursuit.

As we meander through this scholarly labyrinth, let us harness the rigors of empirical research, interspersed with a sprinkling of levity, as we unravel the enigmatic bond between Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores. Join us in this earnest endeavor, that it may be, in equal parts, illuminating and entertaining.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and Ross Stores' stock price (ROST). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unearthing the Root Causes: Exploring the Relationship Between Associates Degrees in Social Sciences and History and Ross Stores' Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
The link between educational achievements and stock market movements has been a topic of both intrigue and skepticism. In this study, we meticulously scrutinize the connection between the conferral of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST), a prominent player in the retail industry. Against the backdrop of theoretical models, anecdotal evidence, and a smattering of humorous stock market puns, we utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a ten-year analysis spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9850862, with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, offering nettlesome insights into the dynamic interplay between academic pursuits and market forces. This research not only sheds light on an obscure nexus but also cautions against underestimating the influence of erstwhile history buffs and social science scholars on the capricious realm of stock prices.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intertwining relationship between academic achievements and stock market trends has long piqued the curiosity of scholars and financial analysts alike. The quest to discern the nuanced connections between seemingly disparate realms such as the conferral of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST) has, thus far, yielded a bountiful crop of theories and conjectures. It is against this backdrop of "serious" academia and financial jargon that we embark upon our investigation, armed with statistical measures and a zest for uncovering the underlying fabric of this unlikely correlation.
While some may view the pursuit of such associations as a quixotic endeavor, we find ourselves irresistibly drawn to the tantalizing prospect of unearthing potential causative links, all while navigating the labyrinthine pathways of stock market fluctuations and academic pursuits. Indeed, our endeavor encapsulates both the whimsical fascination of probing into unconventional relationships and the earnest rigor of empirical research.
The premise of this study stands on the precipice of conventional wisdom, daring to thrust itself into the uncharted territories of academic disciplines and the volatility of stock markets. By delving deep into the annals of the National Center for Education Statistics and harnessing the wealth of market data from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we endeavor to unveil the covert liaisons between the conferral of Associates degrees in the seemingly unrelated spheres of Social Sciences and History and the stock price movements of Ross Stores (ROST).
As we embark on this expedition, we acknowledge that our pursuit intertwines the mundane with the mystique, melding academic data with market indices, and weaving anecdotes with statistical significance. With a measured dose of skepticism and a hint of whimsy, we brace ourselves for the multifaceted journey of unraveling the correlation – or cause célèbre, if you will – between the pursuits of history buffs and social science savants and the capricious dance of a retail giant's stock price.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we aim to navigate the intricate web of data analysis while peppering our discourse with witticisms, puns, and unanticipated whimsies, all in the noble pursuit of shedding light on this improbable and intriguing nexus. Join us, if you will, as we embark on this academic odyssey, where the laughter of history and the gravity of stock prices intermingle in our quest to uncover the underlying roots of this hitherto overlooked link.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic correlation between the conferral of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST), we employed an extensive array of research methods that rivaled the complexity of deciphering esoteric historical manuscripts. Our data collection unfolded like a riveting tale, with a plot twist at every turn – sourced from the National Center for Education Statistics and complemented by the extensive market insights proffered by LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv).

Our journey through the quagmire of data analysis commenced with the procurement of historical data on the issuance of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History from the National Center for Education Statistics. With a discerning eye for detail and a flair for perusing labyrinthine databases, we sifted through the annals of academic conferrals, akin to unearthing buried treasures in a scholarly treasure hunt.

Simultaneously, our foray into the volatile realm of stock prices involved the procurement of historical stock data of Ross Stores (ROST) from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). Our methodological sleight of hand, akin to a financial wizardry, entailed the frugal use of a smorgasbord of stock market indices, day-to-day price movements, and arcane trading volumes – all facets as integral to our research as the ingredients of a well-crafted potion.

With kernels of data in hand, we employed the venerable statistical software SAS to undertake a rigorous analysis that would rival the precision of an expert archer aiming to decipher the intricate relationship between academic pursuits and market vicissitudes. Our commitment to precision was unwavering, akin to the steely resolve of a board game enthusiast dissecting the rules of a new game.

Subsequently, we employed a series of statistical tools, including correlation analyses, regression models, and time series assessments, to plumb the depths of our collected data. This analytical odyssey was not devoid of twists and turns, and much like a nail-biting whodunit, we confronted unexpected plot developments and statistical anomalies.

Our methodology was further fortified with robust strategies to account for potential confounders, outliers, and other lurking specters that could imperil the sanctity of our findings. We leveraged the wisdom of renowned statisticians and financial mavericks, while keeping our own pun-laden humor closely under wraps.

Lastly, we navigated the ethereal realms of statistical significance testing, where p-values shimmered like elusive fireflies in the night. We guarded against the siren call of spurious conclusions with the vigilance of a seasoned mariner navigating treacherous waters.

In corroboration with these data-driven quests, we treaded lightly, mindful of the potential biases and pitfalls that may elude the casual observer, evoking the image of a cautious explorer navigating a minefield of potential academic mishaps.

Our methodology rests on a foundation of unwavering commitment, statistical prowess, and a touch of academic whimsy, as we set forth to unravel the hitherto obscure connection between Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price movements of Ross Stores.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and Ross Stores' stock price (ROST). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9850862, r-squared of 0.9703948, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unearthing the Root Causes: Exploring the Relationship Between Associates Degrees in Social Sciences and History and Ross Stores' Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
The link between educational achievements and stock market movements has been a topic of both intrigue and skepticism. In this study, we meticulously scrutinize the connection between the conferral of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST), a prominent player in the retail industry. Against the backdrop of theoretical models, anecdotal evidence, and a smattering of humorous stock market puns, we utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a ten-year analysis spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9850862, with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, offering nettlesome insights into the dynamic interplay between academic pursuits and market forces. This research not only sheds light on an obscure nexus but also cautions against underestimating the influence of erstwhile history buffs and social science scholars on the capricious realm of stock prices.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intertwining relationship between academic achievements and stock market trends has long piqued the curiosity of scholars and financial analysts alike. The quest to discern the nuanced connections between seemingly disparate realms such as the conferral of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST) has, thus far, yielded a bountiful crop of theories and conjectures. It is against this backdrop of "serious" academia and financial jargon that we embark upon our investigation, armed with statistical measures and a zest for uncovering the underlying fabric of this unlikely correlation.
While some may view the pursuit of such associations as a quixotic endeavor, we find ourselves irresistibly drawn to the tantalizing prospect of unearthing potential causative links, all while navigating the labyrinthine pathways of stock market fluctuations and academic pursuits. Indeed, our endeavor encapsulates both the whimsical fascination of probing into unconventional relationships and the earnest rigor of empirical research.
The premise of this study stands on the precipice of conventional wisdom, daring to thrust itself into the uncharted territories of academic disciplines and the volatility of stock markets. By delving deep into the annals of the National Center for Education Statistics and harnessing the wealth of market data from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we endeavor to unveil the covert liaisons between the conferral of Associates degrees in the seemingly unrelated spheres of Social Sciences and History and the stock price movements of Ross Stores (ROST).
As we embark on this expedition, we acknowledge that our pursuit intertwines the mundane with the mystique, melding academic data with market indices, and weaving anecdotes with statistical significance. With a measured dose of skepticism and a hint of whimsy, we brace ourselves for the multifaceted journey of unraveling the correlation – or cause célèbre, if you will – between the pursuits of history buffs and social science savants and the capricious dance of a retail giant's stock price.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we aim to navigate the intricate web of data analysis while peppering our discourse with witticisms, puns, and unanticipated whimsies, all in the noble pursuit of shedding light on this improbable and intriguing nexus. Join us, if you will, as we embark on this academic odyssey, where the laughter of history and the gravity of stock prices intermingle in our quest to uncover the underlying roots of this hitherto overlooked link.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The pursuit of uncovering the elusive connections between the conferral of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the capricious realm of the stock market has yielded a treasure trove of insights. Our ten-year analysis from 2011 to 2021 has unearthed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9850862, with an r-squared of 0.9703948 and a statistical significance of p < 0.01, affirming the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly incongruent phenomena.

Figure 1 illustrates the strong correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST), elucidating the remarkably synchronized patterns that underlie this unlikely nexus.

This resounding correlation between academic pursuits and market dynamics not only defies conventional wisdom but also underscores the intricacies of the stock market, where the quixotic influence of erstwhile history buffs and social science scholars cannot be overlooked. The findings present a compelling narrative that challenges the dichotomy between academic endeavors and financial markets, compelling us to reconsider the underappreciated role of knowledge seekers in shaping stock price movements.

In light of these intriguing results, we are prompted to reconsider the nebulous interplay between educational milestones and market forces, evoking a sense of wonder at the unanticipated and multifaceted ramifications of academic achievements on the ebb and flow of stock prices.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and Ross Stores' stock price (ROST). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Unearthing the Root Causes: Exploring the Relationship Between Associates Degrees in Social Sciences and History and Ross Stores' Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
The link between educational achievements and stock market movements has been a topic of both intrigue and skepticism. In this study, we meticulously scrutinize the connection between the conferral of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST), a prominent player in the retail industry. Against the backdrop of theoretical models, anecdotal evidence, and a smattering of humorous stock market puns, we utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a ten-year analysis spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9850862, with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, offering nettlesome insights into the dynamic interplay between academic pursuits and market forces. This research not only sheds light on an obscure nexus but also cautions against underestimating the influence of erstwhile history buffs and social science scholars on the capricious realm of stock prices.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The current state of scholarship regarding the correlation between academic achievements and stock market movements provides a rich tapestry of both serious inquiry and peculiar conjectures. Smith et al. (2018) delved into the esoteric realm of educational influences on market dynamics, offering a comprehensive analysis of the link between humanities degrees and retail stock performance. However, as we plunge deeper into this nexus, we encounter not only the solemn tomes of financial analysis but also a smattering of less conventional sources that have dared to ponder the elusive connections.
In "The History of Market Trends: An In-Depth Analysis" by Doe (2015), the author explores the unsuspected influences of historical academic pursuits on the ebb and flow of stock prices. This work lays the groundwork for our own endeavor, inviting us to contemplate the intriguing interplay between history and market forces with a blend of skepticism and open-minded speculation. Furthermore, Jones et al. (2020) probed the uncharted territories of academic disciplines and stock market volatility, peppering their discourse with witticisms and puns in an attempt to decipher the confounding relationship between the pursuit of knowledge and the unpredictability of market movements.
Venturing into the realm of non-fiction literature, works such as "The Wealth of Nations" by Adam Smith and "A Random Walk Down Wall Street" by Burton Malkiel beckon us to contemplate the subtle undercurrents that may tie the ostensibly divergent worlds of academia and stock markets. Meanwhile, fictitious tomes such as "The Mystery of the Missing Stock Prices" by Agatha Christie and "The Quirks of Quants: A Tale of Financial Forecasting" by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle provide a whimsical respite, albeit at the fringes of relevance, as we navigate the labyrinthine pathways of historical pursuits and financial caprices.
Drawing inspiration from unorthodox sources, the board game "Stock Market Monopoly" inadvertently perpetuates the myth of stock market mastery, while the blithe randomness of "Chutes and Ladders: Wall Street Edition" humorously underscores the serendipitous nature of market movements, albeit in a purely ludic context. These unconventional musings inform our approach to our investigation, subtly reminding us of the whimsical nature of our scholarly pursuit.
As we meander through this scholarly labyrinth, let us harness the rigors of empirical research, interspersed with a sprinkling of levity, as we unravel the enigmatic bond between Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores. Join us in this earnest endeavor, that it may be, in equal parts, illuminating and entertaining.

[[RESULTS]]
The pursuit of uncovering the elusive connections between the conferral of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the capricious realm of the stock market has yielded a treasure trove of insights. Our ten-year analysis from 2011 to 2021 has unearthed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9850862, with an r-squared of 0.9703948 and a statistical significance of p < 0.01, affirming the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly incongruent phenomena.
Figure 1 illustrates the strong correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST), elucidating the remarkably synchronized patterns that underlie this unlikely nexus.
This resounding correlation between academic pursuits and market dynamics not only defies conventional wisdom but also underscores the intricacies of the stock market, where the quixotic influence of erstwhile history buffs and social science scholars cannot be overlooked. The findings present a compelling narrative that challenges the dichotomy between academic endeavors and financial markets, compelling us to reconsider the underappreciated role of knowledge seekers in shaping stock price movements.
In light of these intriguing results, we are prompted to reconsider the nebulous interplay between educational milestones and market forces, evoking a sense of wonder at the unanticipated and multifaceted ramifications of academic achievements on the ebb and flow of stock prices.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The striking correlation uncovered in our study between Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST) provides intriguing food for thought and warrants further discussion. Building on the whimsical observations and unconventional musings from the literature review, our findings support the prior research that dared to ponder the elusive connections between academic pursuits and market forces.

Smith et al. (2018) set the stage for our investigation by delving into the link between humanities degrees and retail stock performance. Their earnest inquiry into the intricate relationship between academic achievements and market dynamics finds resonance in our own discernment of the remarkably synchronized patterns underlying this unlikely nexus. Furthermore, the speculative yet serious work of Doe (2015) and the pun-laden exploration by Jones et al. (2020) into the uncharted territories of academic disciplines and stock market volatility serve as beacons guiding our empirical investigation.

The resounding correlation coefficient of 0.9850862 and the r-squared of 0.9703948 affirm the robustness of the relationship between conferral of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the capricious realm of the stock market. These statistically significant findings starkly challenge the dichotomy between academic endeavors and financial markets, underscoring the intricacies of the stock market and implicitly acknowledging the quixotic influence of erstwhile history buffs and social science scholars. The unexpected support of prior conjectures and offhand remarks subtly reinforces the notion that academia and market forces may not be as incongruent as commonly assumed.

This study offers nettlesome but illuminating insights, cautioning against underestimating the influence of historical pursuits and social science scholarship on the ebb and flow of stock prices. The unanticipated and multifaceted ramifications of academic achievements found in our research evoke a sense of wonder, beckoning scholars to further unravel the enigmatic bond between educational milestones and market forces. As we navigate the scholarly labyrinth with a sprinkle of levity, let us heed the call for earnest endeavors that are both illuminating and entertaining.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Social sciences and history and Ross Stores' stock price (ROST). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Unearthing the Root Causes: Exploring the Relationship Between Associates Degrees in Social Sciences and History and Ross Stores' Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
The link between educational achievements and stock market movements has been a topic of both intrigue and skepticism. In this study, we meticulously scrutinize the connection between the conferral of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST), a prominent player in the retail industry. Against the backdrop of theoretical models, anecdotal evidence, and a smattering of humorous stock market puns, we utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a ten-year analysis spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9850862, with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, offering nettlesome insights into the dynamic interplay between academic pursuits and market forces. This research not only sheds light on an obscure nexus but also cautions against underestimating the influence of erstwhile history buffs and social science scholars on the capricious realm of stock prices.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intertwining relationship between academic achievements and stock market trends has long piqued the curiosity of scholars and financial analysts alike. The quest to discern the nuanced connections between seemingly disparate realms such as the conferral of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST) has, thus far, yielded a bountiful crop of theories and conjectures. It is against this backdrop of "serious" academia and financial jargon that we embark upon our investigation, armed with statistical measures and a zest for uncovering the underlying fabric of this unlikely correlation.
While some may view the pursuit of such associations as a quixotic endeavor, we find ourselves irresistibly drawn to the tantalizing prospect of unearthing potential causative links, all while navigating the labyrinthine pathways of stock market fluctuations and academic pursuits. Indeed, our endeavor encapsulates both the whimsical fascination of probing into unconventional relationships and the earnest rigor of empirical research.
The premise of this study stands on the precipice of conventional wisdom, daring to thrust itself into the uncharted territories of academic disciplines and the volatility of stock markets. By delving deep into the annals of the National Center for Education Statistics and harnessing the wealth of market data from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we endeavor to unveil the covert liaisons between the conferral of Associates degrees in the seemingly unrelated spheres of Social Sciences and History and the stock price movements of Ross Stores (ROST).
As we embark on this expedition, we acknowledge that our pursuit intertwines the mundane with the mystique, melding academic data with market indices, and weaving anecdotes with statistical significance. With a measured dose of skepticism and a hint of whimsy, we brace ourselves for the multifaceted journey of unraveling the correlation – or cause célèbre, if you will – between the pursuits of history buffs and social science savants and the capricious dance of a retail giant's stock price.
In the subsequent sections of this paper, we aim to navigate the intricate web of data analysis while peppering our discourse with witticisms, puns, and unanticipated whimsies, all in the noble pursuit of shedding light on this improbable and intriguing nexus. Join us, if you will, as we embark on this academic odyssey, where the laughter of history and the gravity of stock prices intermingle in our quest to uncover the underlying roots of this hitherto overlooked link.

[[RESULTS]]
The pursuit of uncovering the elusive connections between the conferral of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the capricious realm of the stock market has yielded a treasure trove of insights. Our ten-year analysis from 2011 to 2021 has unearthed a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9850862, with an r-squared of 0.9703948 and a statistical significance of p < 0.01, affirming the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly incongruent phenomena.
Figure 1 illustrates the strong correlation between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST), elucidating the remarkably synchronized patterns that underlie this unlikely nexus.
This resounding correlation between academic pursuits and market dynamics not only defies conventional wisdom but also underscores the intricacies of the stock market, where the quixotic influence of erstwhile history buffs and social science scholars cannot be overlooked. The findings present a compelling narrative that challenges the dichotomy between academic endeavors and financial markets, compelling us to reconsider the underappreciated role of knowledge seekers in shaping stock price movements.
In light of these intriguing results, we are prompted to reconsider the nebulous interplay between educational milestones and market forces, evoking a sense of wonder at the unanticipated and multifaceted ramifications of academic achievements on the ebb and flow of stock prices.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the entangled enigma of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST) has unveiled a remarkably robust correlation, challenging conventional wisdom and humorously raising the specter of erudite individuals waltzing with market forces. The strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9850862, coupled with an imposing statistical significance of p < 0.01, underscores the symbiotic relationship between these seemingly incongruous domains.

As we reflect on the whimsical dance between academia and the stock market, our findings elicit a sense of intrigue and amusement, emphasizing the interwoven tapestry of history buffs and social science aficionados influencing the capricious trajectory of stock prices. Figure 1 aptly captures this synchronized tango, offering a visual testament to the unexpected interconnectedness of these realms.

This study not only offers nettlesome insights but also emphasizes the imperative nature of embracing the capricious influence of erstwhile knowledge seekers on stock market dynamics. It is, however, crucial to recognize the limitations inherent in our analysis and the inherently capricious nature of the stock market, where behind every correlation, there may lurk an elusive causation or a humorous anecdote waiting to be uncovered.

In light of our findings, we assert that further research should explore the potential mechanisms underpinning this unanticipated nexus, potentially shedding light on the hitherto overlooked role of academic achievements in shaping market forces. Nevertheless, it is with a dash of whimsy and a twinkle in our eyes that we declare: no more research is needed in this area. After all, isn't it refreshing to uncover the unexpected and embrace the delightful folly in unraveling the mysteries of our interconnected world?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Unearthing the Root Causes: Exploring the Relationship Between Associates Degrees in Social Sciences and History and Ross Stores' Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Retail Analysis and Liberal Arts Integration


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Unearthing the Root Causes: Exploring the Relationship Between Associates Degrees in Social Sciences and History and Ross Stores' Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Economic and Sociocultural Research (CESR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Unearthing the Root Causes: Exploring the Relationship Between Associates Degrees in Social Sciences and History and Ross Stores' Stock Price with an abstract of The link between educational achievements and stock market movements has been a topic of both intrigue and skepticism. In this study, we meticulously scrutinize the connection between the conferral of Associates degrees in Social Sciences and History and the stock price of Ross Stores (ROST), a prominent player in the retail industry. Against the backdrop of theoretical models, anecdotal evidence, and a smattering of humorous stock market puns, we utilized data from the National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct a ten-year analysis spanning from 2011 to 2021. Our findings reveal a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9850862, with a statistical significance of p < 0.01, offering nettlesome insights into the dynamic interplay between academic pursuits and market forces. This research not only sheds light on an obscure nexus but also cautions against underestimating the influence of erstwhile history buffs and social science scholars on the capricious realm of stock prices.

ChatGPT:

Associates degrees, Social Sciences, History, Ross Stores, stock price, correlation, educational achievements, retail industry, National Center for Education Statistics, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, market forces, academic pursuits, stock market movements

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Associates degrees awarded in Social sciences and history
Detailed data title: Associate's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions with a field of study of Social sciences and history
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associates degrees awarded in Social sciences and history

Ross Stores' stock price (ROST)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Ross Stores (ROST) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Ross Stores' stock price (ROST)

Correlation r = 0.9850862 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9703948 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Ross Stores' stock price (ROST)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Associates degrees awarded in Social sciences and history) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.5E-8. 0.0000000346149144927782700000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 3.5E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 28,889,281 random variables You don't actually need 28 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.94, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Associates degrees awarded in Social sciences and history (Degrees awarded)1277214132156681655417916200562139223692259742824128822
Ross Stores' stock price (ROST) (Stock price)16.0124.2427.1437.1847.425366.0280.8681.8116.48122.54




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([12772,14132,15668,16554,17916,20056,21392,23692,25974,28241,28822,])
array_2 = np.array([16.01,24.24,27.14,37.18,47.42,53,66.02,80.86,81.8,116.48,122.54,])
array_1_name = "Associates degrees awarded in Social sciences and history"
array_2_name = "Ross Stores' stock price (ROST)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 1839 · Black Variable ID: 1255 · Red Variable ID: 1778
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0