about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,778 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Number of public school students in 11th grade and the second variable is Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of public school students in 11th grade increases, so does the collective brainpower. This inadvertently leads to more efficient hot dog eating techniques being discovered and shared on the internet. The Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion, being a keen observer of online trends, picks up on these new methods and incorporates them into their training regimen, ultimately leading to an increase in hotdogs consumed. It's a case of academic achievement indirectly fueling gastronomic glory!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Cutsy art illustration] Generate an image of a bustling high school cafeteria, with 11th grade students happily chatting, eating lunch, and studying. Capture the colorful and vibrant atmosphere of the cafeteria. In the same image, depict a crowded Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, with the reigning champion holding up a trophy triumphantly amid a sea of empty hot dog buns. Ensure the illustration juxtaposes the energetic cafeteria scene with the competitive eating event in a visually engaging way, all while maintaining a charming, whimsical style. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Number of public school students in 11th grade and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style Cutsy art illustration Woodblock painting High-tech Photorealism
ChatGPT: Cutsy art illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Number of public school students in 11th grade and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling high school cafeteria, a group of 11th grade students sit at tables enjoying their lunch break. Meanwhile, at a crowded Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, the reigning champion proudly holds up a trophy surrounded by empty hot dog buns.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cutsy art illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling high school cafeteria, a group of 11th grade students sit at tables enjoying their lunch break. Meanwhile, at a crowded Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, the reigning champion proudly holds up a trophy surrounded by empty hot dog buns. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Cutsy art illustration] Generate an image of a bustling high school cafeteria, with 11th grade students happily chatting, eating lunch, and studying. Capture the colorful and vibrant atmosphere of the cafeteria. In the same image, depict a crowded Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, with the reigning champion holding up a trophy triumphantly amid a sea of empty hot dog buns. Ensure the illustration juxtaposes the energetic cafeteria scene with the competitive eating event in a visually engaging way, all while maintaining a charming, whimsical style.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Number of public school students in 11th grade caused Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Bun Fun: Uncovering the Link Between Young Teens in Their 11th Grade and Frankfurter Feasting

The International Journal of Sausage Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 11th grade and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9525783 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Bun Fun: Uncovering the Link Between Young Teens in Their 11th Grade and Frankfurter Feasting

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into an unexpected nexus between the number of high school students in their 11th grade and the consumption of hotdogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the trusty Wikipedia, our research uncovers a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9525783, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the years 1990 to 2022. The findings of this study not only whisk up interest in the world of competitive eating but also tantalize with the tantalizing thought of a potential correlation between academic milestones and gastronomic feats.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 11th grade and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bun Fun: Uncovering the Link Between Young Teens in Their 11th Grade and Frankfurter Feasting

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into an unexpected nexus between the number of high school students in their 11th grade and the consumption of hotdogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the trusty Wikipedia, our research uncovers a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9525783, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the years 1990 to 2022. The findings of this study not only whisk up interest in the world of competitive eating but also tantalize with the tantalizing thought of a potential correlation between academic milestones and gastronomic feats.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

As the saying goes, "There's always room for puns" - a sentiment particularly felt at the annual Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, where contestants devour impressive quantities of frankfurters with the zeal of a student tackling a lunchtime hotdog in the school cafeteria. In this study, we embark on a lighthearted yet intriguing exploration of the often overlooked connection between the number of high school students in their 11th grade and the astonishing feats of hot dog consumption by the legendary champions of Nathan's famous competition.

While the world of academic research often focuses on weighty matters, we decided to tackle a topic with a bit more 'bite'. Our research was sparked by a casual conversation at a local hotdog stand – where the idea of exploring the potential link between educational demographics and hot dog consumption was met with a mix of skepticism and amusement. The skepticism quickly transformed into intrigue as we delved into the data and uncovered a correlation that could not be dismissed as mere baloney or hogwash.

In a world where academic accolades and competitive eating seem as different as night and day, our study aims to bridge the gap between these seemingly disparate realms. Could it be that the number-crunching in 11th grade classrooms has an inexplicable impact on the hotdog-crunching at Coney Island? Join us on this light-hearted yet compelling inquiry as we endeavor to unravel the enigma of this unexpected correlation.

While our study may be seasoned with a pinch of humor and a dollop of frivolity, the statistical rigor underpinning our analysis is no laughing matter. So, grab a hotdog (or two) and prepare to digest the surprising findings that await in the subsequent sections of this paper. With every statistical bite, we aim to shed light on a connection that may leave you relishing the unconventional links between academic milestones and competitive eating accomplishments. Let the bun fun begin!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 11th grade and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bun Fun: Uncovering the Link Between Young Teens in Their 11th Grade and Frankfurter Feasting

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into an unexpected nexus between the number of high school students in their 11th grade and the consumption of hotdogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the trusty Wikipedia, our research uncovers a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9525783, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the years 1990 to 2022. The findings of this study not only whisk up interest in the world of competitive eating but also tantalize with the tantalizing thought of a potential correlation between academic milestones and gastronomic feats.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As the saying goes, "There's always room for puns" - a sentiment particularly felt at the annual Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, where contestants devour impressive quantities of frankfurters with the zeal of a student tackling a lunchtime hotdog in the school cafeteria. In this study, we embark on a lighthearted yet intriguing exploration of the often overlooked connection between the number of high school students in their 11th grade and the astonishing feats of hot dog consumption by the legendary champions of Nathan's famous competition.
While the world of academic research often focuses on weighty matters, we decided to tackle a topic with a bit more 'bite'. Our research was sparked by a casual conversation at a local hotdog stand – where the idea of exploring the potential link between educational demographics and hot dog consumption was met with a mix of skepticism and amusement. The skepticism quickly transformed into intrigue as we delved into the data and uncovered a correlation that could not be dismissed as mere baloney or hogwash.
In a world where academic accolades and competitive eating seem as different as night and day, our study aims to bridge the gap between these seemingly disparate realms. Could it be that the number-crunching in 11th grade classrooms has an inexplicable impact on the hotdog-crunching at Coney Island? Join us on this light-hearted yet compelling inquiry as we endeavor to unravel the enigma of this unexpected correlation.
While our study may be seasoned with a pinch of humor and a dollop of frivolity, the statistical rigor underpinning our analysis is no laughing matter. So, grab a hotdog (or two) and prepare to digest the surprising findings that await in the subsequent sections of this paper. With every statistical bite, we aim to shed light on a connection that may leave you relishing the unconventional links between academic milestones and competitive eating accomplishments. Let the bun fun begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, Smith et al. (2010) delves into the often-neglected nexus between educational demographics and competitive eating, uncovering surprising correlations between academic achievements and feats of gastronomic prowess. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) have extensively examined the dietary habits of high school students in their 11th grade, shedding light on the potential influences of academic stress on eating behaviors.

Steering away from the traditional academic literature, we also consulted non-fiction sources related to competitive eating and education. In "Frankfurters and Final Exams: A Study of Unlikely Pairings" by Culinary Scholar (2018), the author discusses the unexpected parallels between academic milestones and culinary indulgences. Furthermore, "Educational Endeavors and Eating Escapades: Unraveling the Unbelievable Bond" by Dietary Detective (2016) provides intriguing insights into the interplay between educational environments and consuming capacities.

Turning to the world of fiction, we elicit further support for our unconventional inquiry. "The Gulp of Grades: An Epic Tale of Academic Appetites" by Novel Nibbler (2014) paints a vivid picture of the connection between high school years and epicurean endeavors. Moreover, "The Hotdog Chronicles: A Journey Through Buns and Books" by Fictional Feaster (2012) weaves a compelling narrative around the unexpected synergy between educational pursuits and culinary conquests.

In expanding our search, we also drew inspiration from cinematic representations that tangentially relate to the subject at hand. "Teenage Muncher's Delight" (2008) breathes life into the challenges of high school and the world of competitive eating, offering a cinematic portrayal of the potential connections between academic milestones and hotdog consumption. Furthermore, "Coney Island Capers: The Saga of Sausages and Scholars" (2005) takes viewers on a whimsical journey, echoing the themes of our investigation in an entertaining and thought-provoking manner.

As we move forward in our analysis, these whimsical yet related sources provide a broader context for our study, enriching the tapestry of interdisciplinary connections between educational demographics and gustatory accomplishments.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 11th grade and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Wikipedia . You used data from 1990 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bun Fun: Uncovering the Link Between Young Teens in Their 11th Grade and Frankfurter Feasting

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into an unexpected nexus between the number of high school students in their 11th grade and the consumption of hotdogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the trusty Wikipedia, our research uncovers a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9525783, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the years 1990 to 2022. The findings of this study not only whisk up interest in the world of competitive eating but also tantalize with the tantalizing thought of a potential correlation between academic milestones and gastronomic feats.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As the saying goes, "There's always room for puns" - a sentiment particularly felt at the annual Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, where contestants devour impressive quantities of frankfurters with the zeal of a student tackling a lunchtime hotdog in the school cafeteria. In this study, we embark on a lighthearted yet intriguing exploration of the often overlooked connection between the number of high school students in their 11th grade and the astonishing feats of hot dog consumption by the legendary champions of Nathan's famous competition.
While the world of academic research often focuses on weighty matters, we decided to tackle a topic with a bit more 'bite'. Our research was sparked by a casual conversation at a local hotdog stand – where the idea of exploring the potential link between educational demographics and hot dog consumption was met with a mix of skepticism and amusement. The skepticism quickly transformed into intrigue as we delved into the data and uncovered a correlation that could not be dismissed as mere baloney or hogwash.
In a world where academic accolades and competitive eating seem as different as night and day, our study aims to bridge the gap between these seemingly disparate realms. Could it be that the number-crunching in 11th grade classrooms has an inexplicable impact on the hotdog-crunching at Coney Island? Join us on this light-hearted yet compelling inquiry as we endeavor to unravel the enigma of this unexpected correlation.
While our study may be seasoned with a pinch of humor and a dollop of frivolity, the statistical rigor underpinning our analysis is no laughing matter. So, grab a hotdog (or two) and prepare to digest the surprising findings that await in the subsequent sections of this paper. With every statistical bite, we aim to shed light on a connection that may leave you relishing the unconventional links between academic milestones and competitive eating accomplishments. Let the bun fun begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Sample Selection:
To uncover the mysterious link between the number of public school students in their 11th grade and the hotdog consumption prowess of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champion, we embarked on a quest through the labyrinthine networks of the National Center for Education Statistics and the delightful rabbit hole of Wikipedia. The journey began with a casual browsing of statistics and ended with a riveting slideshow presentation on the surprisingly captivating world of educational demographics.

Data Collection:
Armed with determination, spreadsheets, and a healthy dose of skepticism, we scoured the available data from 1990 to 2022, sifting through the digital haystack to find some statistical needles. The search involved encoding complex algorithms to decipher the relationship between teen academics and the consumption habits of elite hotdog devourers. Our data collection process was as meticulous as a hotdog eating contest judge, aiming to capture every single nugget of information, both relevant and ribtickling.

Data Analysis:
With an artillery of statistical software and a knack for extracting tantalizing insights, we set out to crunch numbers with the precision of a hotdog bun manufacturer. We employed regression models, correlation analyses, and various spatial statistical techniques to unearth any semblance of a link between these seemingly incongruous variables. Through rigorous mathematical acrobatics, we aimed to illuminate the seemingly dimly lit connection between academic institutions and competitive eating arenas.

Control Variables:
Our analysis also accounted for potential confounding factors, such as regional differences in hotdog consumption and fluctuations in 11th-grade population size. Moreover, we kept a vigilant eye on exogenous variables that might sneakily join the academic and culinary fray. This included the introduction of new condiments, changes in hotdog bun textures, and possible fluctuations in exam schedules that could tantalizingly skew the results.

Ethical Considerations:
Throughout the data collection and analysis processes, we ensured the utmost respect for the privacy and integrity of the educational and gastronomic data involved. Additionally, we maintained a stance of neutrality and professionalism, refraining from any undue bias in our investigation, despite the tempting aroma of the research subject.

By blending scientific rigor with a lighthearted approach, we aim to quench the thirst for knowledge while tickling the taste buds of statistical aficionados and competitive eating enthusiasts alike. With our methodologies as robust as a well-grilled sausage, we present our findings in the subsequent sections, hoping to satiate your appetite for unusual academic-epicurean connections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 11th grade and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Wikipedia .

For the time period 1990 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9525783, r-squared of 0.9074055, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Bun Fun: Uncovering the Link Between Young Teens in Their 11th Grade and Frankfurter Feasting

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into an unexpected nexus between the number of high school students in their 11th grade and the consumption of hotdogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the trusty Wikipedia, our research uncovers a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9525783, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the years 1990 to 2022. The findings of this study not only whisk up interest in the world of competitive eating but also tantalize with the tantalizing thought of a potential correlation between academic milestones and gastronomic feats.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
As the saying goes, "There's always room for puns" - a sentiment particularly felt at the annual Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, where contestants devour impressive quantities of frankfurters with the zeal of a student tackling a lunchtime hotdog in the school cafeteria. In this study, we embark on a lighthearted yet intriguing exploration of the often overlooked connection between the number of high school students in their 11th grade and the astonishing feats of hot dog consumption by the legendary champions of Nathan's famous competition.
While the world of academic research often focuses on weighty matters, we decided to tackle a topic with a bit more 'bite'. Our research was sparked by a casual conversation at a local hotdog stand – where the idea of exploring the potential link between educational demographics and hot dog consumption was met with a mix of skepticism and amusement. The skepticism quickly transformed into intrigue as we delved into the data and uncovered a correlation that could not be dismissed as mere baloney or hogwash.
In a world where academic accolades and competitive eating seem as different as night and day, our study aims to bridge the gap between these seemingly disparate realms. Could it be that the number-crunching in 11th grade classrooms has an inexplicable impact on the hotdog-crunching at Coney Island? Join us on this light-hearted yet compelling inquiry as we endeavor to unravel the enigma of this unexpected correlation.
While our study may be seasoned with a pinch of humor and a dollop of frivolity, the statistical rigor underpinning our analysis is no laughing matter. So, grab a hotdog (or two) and prepare to digest the surprising findings that await in the subsequent sections of this paper. With every statistical bite, we aim to shed light on a connection that may leave you relishing the unconventional links between academic milestones and competitive eating accomplishments. Let the bun fun begin!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

We can't help but relish the tantalizing correlation uncovered in this study. After churning through the data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Wikipedia, we found a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9525783 between the number of public school students in their 11th grade and the hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. That's right, folks - there's a statistical link between academia and frankfurter feasting!

Not only was the correlation coefficient impressive, but the r-squared value of 0.9074055 tells us that a whopping 90.7% of the variability in hotdog consumption can be explained by the number of 11th grade students. It's as if the number of young minds in their junior year has a direct bearing on the incredible hotdog-devouring abilities of the Nathan's champion. Who would have thought that academic milestones and gastronomic feats could be so intimately intertwined?

And just to add a cherry on top of this statistical sundae, the p-value was less than 0.01, indicating that this connection is certainly no fluke - unless we're talking about a hotdog-eating contest, in which case it would be entirely apropos.

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that vividly illustrates this robust association. You can see the trend line stretching proudly through the data points, showcasing the unmistakable link between the number of 11th graders and the hotdog-consumption prowess of the Nathan's champion. It's a sight to behold, much like witnessing a masterful hotdog-eating performance itself.

In conclusion, we have uncovered a statistical relationship that not only delights the taste buds of statistical aficionados but also ignites curiosity about the unexpected connections that underlie academic and culinary phenomena. The findings of this study not only satisfy our appetite for statistical discovery but also leave us hungry for further exploration of the delightful, yet perplexing, world of bun fun.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 11th grade and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Bun Fun: Uncovering the Link Between Young Teens in Their 11th Grade and Frankfurter Feasting

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into an unexpected nexus between the number of high school students in their 11th grade and the consumption of hotdogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the trusty Wikipedia, our research uncovers a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9525783, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the years 1990 to 2022. The findings of this study not only whisk up interest in the world of competitive eating but also tantalize with the tantalizing thought of a potential correlation between academic milestones and gastronomic feats.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith et al. (2010) delves into the often-neglected nexus between educational demographics and competitive eating, uncovering surprising correlations between academic achievements and feats of gastronomic prowess. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) have extensively examined the dietary habits of high school students in their 11th grade, shedding light on the potential influences of academic stress on eating behaviors.
Steering away from the traditional academic literature, we also consulted non-fiction sources related to competitive eating and education. In "Frankfurters and Final Exams: A Study of Unlikely Pairings" by Culinary Scholar (2018), the author discusses the unexpected parallels between academic milestones and culinary indulgences. Furthermore, "Educational Endeavors and Eating Escapades: Unraveling the Unbelievable Bond" by Dietary Detective (2016) provides intriguing insights into the interplay between educational environments and consuming capacities.
Turning to the world of fiction, we elicit further support for our unconventional inquiry. "The Gulp of Grades: An Epic Tale of Academic Appetites" by Novel Nibbler (2014) paints a vivid picture of the connection between high school years and epicurean endeavors. Moreover, "The Hotdog Chronicles: A Journey Through Buns and Books" by Fictional Feaster (2012) weaves a compelling narrative around the unexpected synergy between educational pursuits and culinary conquests.
In expanding our search, we also drew inspiration from cinematic representations that tangentially relate to the subject at hand. "Teenage Muncher's Delight" (2008) breathes life into the challenges of high school and the world of competitive eating, offering a cinematic portrayal of the potential connections between academic milestones and hotdog consumption. Furthermore, "Coney Island Capers: The Saga of Sausages and Scholars" (2005) takes viewers on a whimsical journey, echoing the themes of our investigation in an entertaining and thought-provoking manner.
As we move forward in our analysis, these whimsical yet related sources provide a broader context for our study, enriching the tapestry of interdisciplinary connections between educational demographics and gustatory accomplishments.

[[RESULTS]]
We can't help but relish the tantalizing correlation uncovered in this study. After churning through the data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Wikipedia, we found a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9525783 between the number of public school students in their 11th grade and the hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. That's right, folks - there's a statistical link between academia and frankfurter feasting!
Not only was the correlation coefficient impressive, but the r-squared value of 0.9074055 tells us that a whopping 90.7% of the variability in hotdog consumption can be explained by the number of 11th grade students. It's as if the number of young minds in their junior year has a direct bearing on the incredible hotdog-devouring abilities of the Nathan's champion. Who would have thought that academic milestones and gastronomic feats could be so intimately intertwined?
And just to add a cherry on top of this statistical sundae, the p-value was less than 0.01, indicating that this connection is certainly no fluke - unless we're talking about a hotdog-eating contest, in which case it would be entirely apropos.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that vividly illustrates this robust association. You can see the trend line stretching proudly through the data points, showcasing the unmistakable link between the number of 11th graders and the hotdog-consumption prowess of the Nathan's champion. It's a sight to behold, much like witnessing a masterful hotdog-eating performance itself.
In conclusion, we have uncovered a statistical relationship that not only delights the taste buds of statistical aficionados but also ignites curiosity about the unexpected connections that underlie academic and culinary phenomena. The findings of this study not only satisfy our appetite for statistical discovery but also leave us hungry for further exploration of the delightful, yet perplexing, world of bun fun.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The hearty results of our study not only bolster the existing research but also add a generous helping of statistical gravitas to the burgeoning field of academic inquiry into the curious link between educational demographics and competitive eating. As we delve deeper into the implications of our findings, we find ourselves grappling with a conundrum that is both appetizing and academically tantalizing.

The correlation coefficient of 0.9525783 that we merrily uncovered lends support to the works of Smith et al. (2010) and Doe and Jones (2015), who, with serious intent, teased out the subtle influences of academic milestones on culinary feats. Our study doesn't just ketchup with their findings, but rather relishes in the robustness of their previous inquiries. These whimsically titled publications, such as "Frankfurters and Final Exams: A Study of Unlikely Pairings" and "Educational Endeavors and Eating Escapades: Unraveling the Unbelievable Bond," are now garnished with our statistically significant addition, enriching the academic buffet of literature in this niche area.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9074055 underscores the savory notion that a large proportion of the variation in hotdog consumption can be sausaged to the number of 11th grade students. In other words, it seems that the academic gravitas of these young minds has an overwhelming impact on the voracious victors of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. This resonates with the intangible yet formidable ways in which academic environments can influence the consumption capacities of competitive eaters, as astutely hinted at in the fictional works "The Gulp of Grades: An Epic Tale of Academic Appetites" and "The Hotdog Chronicles: A Journey Through Buns and Books."

Ah, the p-value of less than 0.01! With a result so tantalizing, one could say the probability of a spurious connection is as low as the chances of finding a vegetarian at a sausage fest. Our findings echo the themes portrayed in the cinematic representations "Teenage Muncher's Delight" and "Coney Island Capers: The Saga of Sausages and Scholars," adding a layer of statistical intrigue to the whimsical portrayal of academia and gastronomic indulgence.

In essence, our study not only adds statistical meat to the bone of existing literature but also sets the table for further exploration of the unexpected connections that underpin academic and culinary phenomena. The delightful world of bun fun certainly holds promise for future studies and may just provide the perfect opportunity for scholars to sink their teeth into a truly unique field of inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of public school students in 11th grade and Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Bun Fun: Uncovering the Link Between Young Teens in Their 11th Grade and Frankfurter Feasting

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into an unexpected nexus between the number of high school students in their 11th grade and the consumption of hotdogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the trusty Wikipedia, our research uncovers a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9525783, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the years 1990 to 2022. The findings of this study not only whisk up interest in the world of competitive eating but also tantalize with the tantalizing thought of a potential correlation between academic milestones and gastronomic feats.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
As the saying goes, "There's always room for puns" - a sentiment particularly felt at the annual Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, where contestants devour impressive quantities of frankfurters with the zeal of a student tackling a lunchtime hotdog in the school cafeteria. In this study, we embark on a lighthearted yet intriguing exploration of the often overlooked connection between the number of high school students in their 11th grade and the astonishing feats of hot dog consumption by the legendary champions of Nathan's famous competition.
While the world of academic research often focuses on weighty matters, we decided to tackle a topic with a bit more 'bite'. Our research was sparked by a casual conversation at a local hotdog stand – where the idea of exploring the potential link between educational demographics and hot dog consumption was met with a mix of skepticism and amusement. The skepticism quickly transformed into intrigue as we delved into the data and uncovered a correlation that could not be dismissed as mere baloney or hogwash.
In a world where academic accolades and competitive eating seem as different as night and day, our study aims to bridge the gap between these seemingly disparate realms. Could it be that the number-crunching in 11th grade classrooms has an inexplicable impact on the hotdog-crunching at Coney Island? Join us on this light-hearted yet compelling inquiry as we endeavor to unravel the enigma of this unexpected correlation.
While our study may be seasoned with a pinch of humor and a dollop of frivolity, the statistical rigor underpinning our analysis is no laughing matter. So, grab a hotdog (or two) and prepare to digest the surprising findings that await in the subsequent sections of this paper. With every statistical bite, we aim to shed light on a connection that may leave you relishing the unconventional links between academic milestones and competitive eating accomplishments. Let the bun fun begin!

[[RESULTS]]
We can't help but relish the tantalizing correlation uncovered in this study. After churning through the data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Wikipedia, we found a strikingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.9525783 between the number of public school students in their 11th grade and the hotdogs consumed by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. That's right, folks - there's a statistical link between academia and frankfurter feasting!
Not only was the correlation coefficient impressive, but the r-squared value of 0.9074055 tells us that a whopping 90.7% of the variability in hotdog consumption can be explained by the number of 11th grade students. It's as if the number of young minds in their junior year has a direct bearing on the incredible hotdog-devouring abilities of the Nathan's champion. Who would have thought that academic milestones and gastronomic feats could be so intimately intertwined?
And just to add a cherry on top of this statistical sundae, the p-value was less than 0.01, indicating that this connection is certainly no fluke - unless we're talking about a hotdog-eating contest, in which case it would be entirely apropos.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that vividly illustrates this robust association. You can see the trend line stretching proudly through the data points, showcasing the unmistakable link between the number of 11th graders and the hotdog-consumption prowess of the Nathan's champion. It's a sight to behold, much like witnessing a masterful hotdog-eating performance itself.
In conclusion, we have uncovered a statistical relationship that not only delights the taste buds of statistical aficionados but also ignites curiosity about the unexpected connections that underlie academic and culinary phenomena. The findings of this study not only satisfy our appetite for statistical discovery but also leave us hungry for further exploration of the delightful, yet perplexing, world of bun fun.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the wise words of Oscar Wilde, "Life is too short to miss the joy of a perfectly grilled hotdog!" Our study has certainly embraced this sentiment, uncovering a correlation so strong that it's enough to make your statistical buns sizzle. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9525783, it seems that as the number of 11th graders rises, so does the hotdog consumption of the Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition champion. It's a statistical match made in meaty heaven!

As we wrap up this gastronomically-themed statistical adventure, it's clear that our findings have mustard, I mean, mustered quite the appetite for further investigation. The idea that academic milestones could somehow influence the devouring of hotdogs at a competitive level is as tantalizing as the aroma of a sizzling grill on a summer day. It's a veritable feast for thought, challenging conventional notions of cause and effect.

The robust statistical evidence we've amassed not only adds a spicy kick to the field of competitive eating research but also serves as a reminder that statistical inquiry can be as flavorful as any culinary delight. By uncovering this unlikely connection, we have not only broadened our understanding of the world but also ignited a craving for more unconventional statistical pairings.

However, it's time to put a lid on this particular study. In the grand tradition of a well-timed punchline, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. We've relished the statistical tale of academic triumph and hotdog heroism, leaving us with the sense that sometimes, statistical correlations are indeed a "wiener"-takes-all game.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Bun Fun: Uncovering the Link Between Young Teens in Their 11th Grade and Frankfurter Feasting. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Sausage Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Bun Fun: Uncovering the Link Between Young Teens in Their 11th Grade and Frankfurter Feasting. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Sausage Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Bun Fun: Uncovering the Link Between Young Teens in Their 11th Grade and Frankfurter Feasting with an abstract of This study delves into an unexpected nexus between the number of high school students in their 11th grade and the consumption of hotdogs by the champion of Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition. Drawing on data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the trusty Wikipedia, our research uncovers a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9525783, with statistical significance at p < 0.01, spanning the years 1990 to 2022. The findings of this study not only whisk up interest in the world of competitive eating but also tantalize with the tantalizing thought of a potential correlation between academic milestones and gastronomic feats.

ChatGPT:

"11th grade student population, hot dog consumption, correlation coefficient, National Center for Education Statistics, Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition, competitive eating, academic milestones, potential correlation, statistical significance, gastronomic feats, high school student data"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Number of public school students in 11th grade
Detailed data title: 11th grade enrollment in public elementary and secondary schools
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Number of public school students in 11th grade

Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Detailed data title: Hotdog Consumption by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion

Correlation r = 0.9525783 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9074055 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Number of public school students in 11th grade) over the 33 years from 1990 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.4E-17. 0.0000000000000000142756668651
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 1.4E-15% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 70,049,267,011,457,056 random variables You don't actually need 70 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 32 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 32 because we have two variables measured over a period of 33 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.91, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Number of public school students in 11th grade (Students)261163026451002655950275123027481902826020293030029719203020900303394030828403173940322887032772203369340345442035514403557480354810035409603538480354584035282603525620356786035978303669060367675036527403670810370039036929003670020
Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion (Hotdogs eaten)1621.519172019.522.2524.51920.25255050.544.553.334953.7566596854626869616270727471757663




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,213 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 635,695,369 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2611630,2645100,2655950,2751230,2748190,2826020,2930300,2971920,3020900,3033940,3082840,3173940,3228870,3277220,3369340,3454420,3551440,3557480,3548100,3540960,3538480,3545840,3528260,3525620,3567860,3597830,3669060,3676750,3652740,3670810,3700390,3692900,3670020,])
array_2 = np.array([16,21.5,19,17,20,19.5,22.25,24.5,19,20.25,25,50,50.5,44.5,53.33,49,53.75,66,59,68,54,62,68,69,61,62,70,72,74,71,75,76,63,])
array_1_name = "Number of public school students in 11th grade"
array_2_name = "Hotdogs consumed by Nathan's Hot Dog Eating Competition Champion"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 1778 · Black Variable ID: 1309 · Red Variable ID: 500
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0