about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,672 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Arson in New Mexico and the second variable is Google searches for 'desktop background'.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Apparently, as the number of arson incidents decreased in New Mexico, there was a corresponding decrease in the production of fiery desktop backgrounds. It seems that without the fiery inspiration, people were just not as motivated to search for new and exciting desktop backgrounds.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Woodblock painting ] Create an image of a serene New Mexico sunset, where warm, vibrant colors light up the sky, casting a gentle glow over the sprawling landscape. In the foreground, a person sits on a blanket, using their laptop to search for an inspiring desktop background image, surrounded by the flickering warmth of a bonfire and the silhouettes of people gathered around it. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Arson in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Symbolism Concept art Cubism Psychedelic Woodblock painting
ChatGPT: Woodblock painting

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Arson in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a picturesque New Mexico landscape, a vibrant sunset lights up the horizon as people gather around a bonfire. Meanwhile, in the foreground, a person sits on their laptop, typing in "desktop background" into the Google search bar, looking for a beautiful image to adorn their screensaver.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Woodblock painting ] and depicting this scene: In a picturesque New Mexico landscape, a vibrant sunset lights up the horizon as people gather around a bonfire. Meanwhile, in the foreground, a person sits on their laptop, typing in "desktop background" into the Google search bar, looking for a beautiful image to adorn their screensaver. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Woodblock painting ] Create an image of a serene New Mexico sunset, where warm, vibrant colors light up the sky, casting a gentle glow over the sprawling landscape. In the foreground, a person sits on a blanket, using their laptop to search for an inspiring desktop background image, surrounded by the flickering warmth of a bonfire and the silhouettes of people gathered around it.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Arson in New Mexico caused desktop background (Google searches for 'desktop background') to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Playing with Fire: Arson's Link to Desktop Background Desire

Journal of Pyrokinetic Psychology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8909121 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: Arson's Link to Desktop Background Desire

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing association between arson incidents in New Mexico and Google searches for "desktop background." Utilizing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.8909121 and p < 0.01 was identified for the period spanning from 2007 to 2022. The results reveal a peculiar relationship between acts of arson and individuals' interest in sprucing up their digital workspaces. The implications of these findings and potential causative factors are discussed, shedding light on the unexpected connectivity between fiery phenomena and virtual visual aesthetics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: Arson's Link to Desktop Background Desire

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing association between arson incidents in New Mexico and Google searches for "desktop background." Utilizing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.8909121 and p < 0.01 was identified for the period spanning from 2007 to 2022. The results reveal a peculiar relationship between acts of arson and individuals' interest in sprucing up their digital workspaces. The implications of these findings and potential causative factors are discussed, shedding light on the unexpected connectivity between fiery phenomena and virtual visual aesthetics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The prevalence and impact of arson incidents have long been a subject of immense concern and interest within the public sphere, law enforcement agencies, and the research community. Arson, the deliberate and criminal act of setting fire to property, not only inflicts substantial economic and social costs but also poses significant threats to public safety and well-being. In parallel, the pursuit of aesthetic pleasures and the customization of digital workspaces in contemporary society have increasingly become enmeshed in individuals' daily routines. Surprisingly, the intersection of these seemingly disparate domains - arson and desktop background preferences - has garnered attention due to the revelation of an unexpected correlation between these phenomena. This study delves into this unanticipated relationship, seeking to unravel the underlying dynamics and potential implications of the linkage between arson in New Mexico and Google searches for "desktop background."

The juxtaposition of arson and digital aesthetics may at first glance appear peculiar and enigmatic, akin to a matchstick igniting an unexpected burst of creativity in a seemingly unrelated domain. The study aims to explore the nuances of this association by examining data obtained from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services juxtaposed with insights from Google Trends. The emerging correlation reveals an underlying interplay between acts of arson and individuals' proclivity towards embellishing their virtual work environments. This unanticipated association raises intriguing questions about the underlying human motivations and behavioral drivers that intertwine seemingly unrelated pursuits. As we peel back the layers of this curious connection, we are compelled to consider the multifaceted nature of human curiosity, desire, and perhaps even subliminal inclinations that manifest in ways we may not readily comprehend.

Therefore, this paper seeks to elucidate the empirical evidence of the nexus between arson and desktop background pursuits, as well as to provide a platform for pondering the broader implications and potential causative factors underlying this perplexing correlation. The findings unearthed from this investigation offer a unique vantage point from which to contemplate the interplay between physical and virtual domains, thereby unlocking unexpected insights into our collective human predilections and the intricate interweaving of seemingly disparate aspects of modern life. Through this exploration, we aim to ignite further scholarly discourse and spark a conflagration of curiosity in untangling the enigmatic bond between flames and pixels.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: Arson's Link to Desktop Background Desire

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing association between arson incidents in New Mexico and Google searches for "desktop background." Utilizing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.8909121 and p < 0.01 was identified for the period spanning from 2007 to 2022. The results reveal a peculiar relationship between acts of arson and individuals' interest in sprucing up their digital workspaces. The implications of these findings and potential causative factors are discussed, shedding light on the unexpected connectivity between fiery phenomena and virtual visual aesthetics.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The prevalence and impact of arson incidents have long been a subject of immense concern and interest within the public sphere, law enforcement agencies, and the research community. Arson, the deliberate and criminal act of setting fire to property, not only inflicts substantial economic and social costs but also poses significant threats to public safety and well-being. In parallel, the pursuit of aesthetic pleasures and the customization of digital workspaces in contemporary society have increasingly become enmeshed in individuals' daily routines. Surprisingly, the intersection of these seemingly disparate domains - arson and desktop background preferences - has garnered attention due to the revelation of an unexpected correlation between these phenomena. This study delves into this unanticipated relationship, seeking to unravel the underlying dynamics and potential implications of the linkage between arson in New Mexico and Google searches for "desktop background."
The juxtaposition of arson and digital aesthetics may at first glance appear peculiar and enigmatic, akin to a matchstick igniting an unexpected burst of creativity in a seemingly unrelated domain. The study aims to explore the nuances of this association by examining data obtained from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services juxtaposed with insights from Google Trends. The emerging correlation reveals an underlying interplay between acts of arson and individuals' proclivity towards embellishing their virtual work environments. This unanticipated association raises intriguing questions about the underlying human motivations and behavioral drivers that intertwine seemingly unrelated pursuits. As we peel back the layers of this curious connection, we are compelled to consider the multifaceted nature of human curiosity, desire, and perhaps even subliminal inclinations that manifest in ways we may not readily comprehend.
Therefore, this paper seeks to elucidate the empirical evidence of the nexus between arson and desktop background pursuits, as well as to provide a platform for pondering the broader implications and potential causative factors underlying this perplexing correlation. The findings unearthed from this investigation offer a unique vantage point from which to contemplate the interplay between physical and virtual domains, thereby unlocking unexpected insights into our collective human predilections and the intricate interweaving of seemingly disparate aspects of modern life. Through this exploration, we aim to ignite further scholarly discourse and spark a conflagration of curiosity in untangling the enigmatic bond between flames and pixels.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors find that Smith et al. (2015) conducted a study on the prevalence and correlates of arson incidents in the southwestern United States, including New Mexico. The study uncovered alarming trends in arson occurrences and underscored the significant economic and social costs associated with these criminal acts. Additionally, the authors highlight the potential impact of arson on public safety and underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions to mitigate the incidence of deliberate fire setting.
Doe and Jones (2018) investigated the behavioral patterns and motivations underpinning individuals' online search queries related to digital customization, including desktop backgrounds. Their analysis revealed intriguing insights into the evolving preferences of internet users for personalizing their virtual workspaces. Moreover, the authors documented the increasing significance of digital aesthetics in shaping individuals' immersive experiences within the digital realm.
Turning to related non-fiction literature, "The Psychology of Arson" by Firestone (2012) offers a comprehensive examination of the psychological underpinnings of arson behaviors, shedding light on the complex interplay between cognitive processes and incendiary actions. In a similar vein, "Digital Aesthetics: A Historical Perspective" by Artman (2016) delves into the evolving landscape of digital visual culture, providing a historical backdrop for understanding the contemporary fascination with virtual aesthetic enhancements.
On a more fictional note, "Burning Desires: A Tale of Arson and Intrigue" by Novelist (2019) weaves a captivating narrative around the enigmatic allure of arson, while "Pixels on Fire: The Quest for the Ultimate Desktop Background" by ImaginativeWriter (2020) casts a whimsical lens on the quest for the perfect digital backdrop, drawing parallels to the fiery passions ignited within the virtual realm.
In the realm of internet culture, the meme "This is fine" featuring a cartoon dog calmly sipping coffee in a burning room humorously encapsulates the juxtaposition of a disastrous situation with a nonchalant response, offering a humorous perspective on the unexpected linkage between fire and nonchalance, albeit in a different context. Furthermore, the meme "Desktop Background Guy" humorously portrays the relentless pursuit of the ideal desktop background, providing a lighthearted take on the digital aesthetic quest that resonates with individuals' fervent search for visual satisfaction in the virtual sphere.

It is quite intriguing how the seemingly disparate domains of arson and digital aesthetics have managed to converge in this body of literature, offering unexpected parallels between fiery phenomena and virtual visual pursuits. These findings serve to underscore the multifaceted nature of human interests and motivations, reflecting the intricate interplay between physical and virtual realms.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends . You used data from 2007 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: Arson's Link to Desktop Background Desire

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing association between arson incidents in New Mexico and Google searches for "desktop background." Utilizing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.8909121 and p < 0.01 was identified for the period spanning from 2007 to 2022. The results reveal a peculiar relationship between acts of arson and individuals' interest in sprucing up their digital workspaces. The implications of these findings and potential causative factors are discussed, shedding light on the unexpected connectivity between fiery phenomena and virtual visual aesthetics.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The prevalence and impact of arson incidents have long been a subject of immense concern and interest within the public sphere, law enforcement agencies, and the research community. Arson, the deliberate and criminal act of setting fire to property, not only inflicts substantial economic and social costs but also poses significant threats to public safety and well-being. In parallel, the pursuit of aesthetic pleasures and the customization of digital workspaces in contemporary society have increasingly become enmeshed in individuals' daily routines. Surprisingly, the intersection of these seemingly disparate domains - arson and desktop background preferences - has garnered attention due to the revelation of an unexpected correlation between these phenomena. This study delves into this unanticipated relationship, seeking to unravel the underlying dynamics and potential implications of the linkage between arson in New Mexico and Google searches for "desktop background."
The juxtaposition of arson and digital aesthetics may at first glance appear peculiar and enigmatic, akin to a matchstick igniting an unexpected burst of creativity in a seemingly unrelated domain. The study aims to explore the nuances of this association by examining data obtained from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services juxtaposed with insights from Google Trends. The emerging correlation reveals an underlying interplay between acts of arson and individuals' proclivity towards embellishing their virtual work environments. This unanticipated association raises intriguing questions about the underlying human motivations and behavioral drivers that intertwine seemingly unrelated pursuits. As we peel back the layers of this curious connection, we are compelled to consider the multifaceted nature of human curiosity, desire, and perhaps even subliminal inclinations that manifest in ways we may not readily comprehend.
Therefore, this paper seeks to elucidate the empirical evidence of the nexus between arson and desktop background pursuits, as well as to provide a platform for pondering the broader implications and potential causative factors underlying this perplexing correlation. The findings unearthed from this investigation offer a unique vantage point from which to contemplate the interplay between physical and virtual domains, thereby unlocking unexpected insights into our collective human predilections and the intricate interweaving of seemingly disparate aspects of modern life. Through this exploration, we aim to ignite further scholarly discourse and spark a conflagration of curiosity in untangling the enigmatic bond between flames and pixels.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
Data pertaining to arson incidents in New Mexico was collected from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, capturing reported cases of deliberate fire-setting from 2007 to 2022. Arson data was meticulously sifted through, akin to searching for a needle in a haystack, to identify instances relevant to the geographical scope of New Mexico. It is essential to note that the acquisition of this data did not involve any actual pyromania, but rather meticulous sifting through databases in a methodical and responsible manner.

To investigate the seemingly incongruous relationship between arson and desktop background searches, Google Trends data was harnessed to measure the search interest in the term "desktop background" within the same temporal span. The intricacies of online search behavior were scrutinized, illuminating the digital trails left by users seeking to adorn their virtual workspaces with a diverse array of background imagery.

Data Analysis:
The obtained arson data, like a smoldering enigma waiting to be unraveled, was subjected to rigorous statistical analyses to detect any underlying patterns or associations. A correlation analysis was performed to ascertain the strength and direction of the relationship between arson incidents and Google searches for "desktop background." The generation of correlation coefficients and p-values served as the kindling for illuminating any potential linkage between these seemingly disparate phenomena.

Additionally, a time-series analysis was conducted to discern temporal trends in arson incidents and desktop background searches, providing insight into potential fluctuations and synchronicities between these divergent domains. The aim was to discern whether peaks and troughs in arson activity corresponded to commensurate changes in digital aesthetic pursuits, akin to a dance of fiery and pixelated rhythms.

Ethical Considerations:
Throughout the course of this study, ethical considerations were paramount. Respect for the privacy of individuals involved in arson incidents and internet users embarking on virtual adornment quests was upheld. The utilization of data from public sources, while crucial for the pursuit of knowledge, involved conscientious handling to ensure the protection of individual privacy and the responsible use of information.

Limitations:
Despite the comprehensive nature of the data utilized, it is important to acknowledge certain limitations inherent to this study. The availability and comprehensiveness of arson data, although meticulously garnished, may not capture the entirety of fire-related incidents within the geographical confines of New Mexico. Furthermore, the nuances of individual search behavior captured by Google Trends may not encapsulate the full spectrum of virtual workspace adornment endeavors, leaving certain subtleties unexplored in our quest to understand the intricate juxtaposition of arson and desktop background pursuits.

In summary, the methodological approach adopted in this study aimed to sift through the ashes of arson data, uncover the digital footprints of desktop background pursuits, and shed light on the unexpected connectivity between these seemingly distinct realms. The collective utilization of data sources hailing from the domains of public safety and virtual search behaviors engendered a multidimensional exploration, akin to kindling a scholarly flame that illuminates the enigmatic linkage between fires and pixels.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends .

For the time period 2007 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8909121, r-squared of 0.7937243, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: Arson's Link to Desktop Background Desire

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing association between arson incidents in New Mexico and Google searches for "desktop background." Utilizing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.8909121 and p < 0.01 was identified for the period spanning from 2007 to 2022. The results reveal a peculiar relationship between acts of arson and individuals' interest in sprucing up their digital workspaces. The implications of these findings and potential causative factors are discussed, shedding light on the unexpected connectivity between fiery phenomena and virtual visual aesthetics.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The prevalence and impact of arson incidents have long been a subject of immense concern and interest within the public sphere, law enforcement agencies, and the research community. Arson, the deliberate and criminal act of setting fire to property, not only inflicts substantial economic and social costs but also poses significant threats to public safety and well-being. In parallel, the pursuit of aesthetic pleasures and the customization of digital workspaces in contemporary society have increasingly become enmeshed in individuals' daily routines. Surprisingly, the intersection of these seemingly disparate domains - arson and desktop background preferences - has garnered attention due to the revelation of an unexpected correlation between these phenomena. This study delves into this unanticipated relationship, seeking to unravel the underlying dynamics and potential implications of the linkage between arson in New Mexico and Google searches for "desktop background."
The juxtaposition of arson and digital aesthetics may at first glance appear peculiar and enigmatic, akin to a matchstick igniting an unexpected burst of creativity in a seemingly unrelated domain. The study aims to explore the nuances of this association by examining data obtained from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services juxtaposed with insights from Google Trends. The emerging correlation reveals an underlying interplay between acts of arson and individuals' proclivity towards embellishing their virtual work environments. This unanticipated association raises intriguing questions about the underlying human motivations and behavioral drivers that intertwine seemingly unrelated pursuits. As we peel back the layers of this curious connection, we are compelled to consider the multifaceted nature of human curiosity, desire, and perhaps even subliminal inclinations that manifest in ways we may not readily comprehend.
Therefore, this paper seeks to elucidate the empirical evidence of the nexus between arson and desktop background pursuits, as well as to provide a platform for pondering the broader implications and potential causative factors underlying this perplexing correlation. The findings unearthed from this investigation offer a unique vantage point from which to contemplate the interplay between physical and virtual domains, thereby unlocking unexpected insights into our collective human predilections and the intricate interweaving of seemingly disparate aspects of modern life. Through this exploration, we aim to ignite further scholarly discourse and spark a conflagration of curiosity in untangling the enigmatic bond between flames and pixels.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The quantitative analysis unveiled a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8909121 between arson incidents in New Mexico and Google searches for "desktop background" over the period 2007 to 2022. The coefficient implies a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena, indicating that as arson events increased, so did the interest in sprucing up digital workspaces with captivating visuals. The coefficient being close to 1 suggests a robust linear association, albeit with some intriguing subtleties to unpack.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7937243 signifies that approximately 79.37% of the variability in desktop background searches can be explained by the variability in arson incidents. This finding underscores the substantial degree of shared variance between the two variables, reinforcing the strength of the identified relationship.

Notably, the p-value of < 0.01 indicates that the correlation observed is statistically significant, firmly establishing the likelihood that this association is not merely a random occurrence.

In Figure 1, the scatterplot visually encapsulates the compelling correlation, serving as a graphic testament to the unexpected bond between arson and digital aesthetic pursuits. This visual representation showcases the tight clustering of data points around the ascending trendline, providing a clear depiction of the synchronous ebb and flow of arson incidents and the quest for visually captivating desktop backgrounds.

The robustness of these statistical findings invites contemplation on the underlying mechanisms driving this curious connection, perhaps illuminating the unsuspected human proclivity to seek digital creative refuge in the midst of fiery phenomena. The implications of these results prompt further exploration into the intriguing interplay between elemental forces and virtual adornments, setting ablaze inquiries into the complex interdependence of seemingly incongruent domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: Arson's Link to Desktop Background Desire

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing association between arson incidents in New Mexico and Google searches for "desktop background." Utilizing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.8909121 and p < 0.01 was identified for the period spanning from 2007 to 2022. The results reveal a peculiar relationship between acts of arson and individuals' interest in sprucing up their digital workspaces. The implications of these findings and potential causative factors are discussed, shedding light on the unexpected connectivity between fiery phenomena and virtual visual aesthetics.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors find that Smith et al. (2015) conducted a study on the prevalence and correlates of arson incidents in the southwestern United States, including New Mexico. The study uncovered alarming trends in arson occurrences and underscored the significant economic and social costs associated with these criminal acts. Additionally, the authors highlight the potential impact of arson on public safety and underscore the urgent need for targeted interventions to mitigate the incidence of deliberate fire setting.
Doe and Jones (2018) investigated the behavioral patterns and motivations underpinning individuals' online search queries related to digital customization, including desktop backgrounds. Their analysis revealed intriguing insights into the evolving preferences of internet users for personalizing their virtual workspaces. Moreover, the authors documented the increasing significance of digital aesthetics in shaping individuals' immersive experiences within the digital realm.
Turning to related non-fiction literature, "The Psychology of Arson" by Firestone (2012) offers a comprehensive examination of the psychological underpinnings of arson behaviors, shedding light on the complex interplay between cognitive processes and incendiary actions. In a similar vein, "Digital Aesthetics: A Historical Perspective" by Artman (2016) delves into the evolving landscape of digital visual culture, providing a historical backdrop for understanding the contemporary fascination with virtual aesthetic enhancements.
On a more fictional note, "Burning Desires: A Tale of Arson and Intrigue" by Novelist (2019) weaves a captivating narrative around the enigmatic allure of arson, while "Pixels on Fire: The Quest for the Ultimate Desktop Background" by ImaginativeWriter (2020) casts a whimsical lens on the quest for the perfect digital backdrop, drawing parallels to the fiery passions ignited within the virtual realm.
In the realm of internet culture, the meme "This is fine" featuring a cartoon dog calmly sipping coffee in a burning room humorously encapsulates the juxtaposition of a disastrous situation with a nonchalant response, offering a humorous perspective on the unexpected linkage between fire and nonchalance, albeit in a different context. Furthermore, the meme "Desktop Background Guy" humorously portrays the relentless pursuit of the ideal desktop background, providing a lighthearted take on the digital aesthetic quest that resonates with individuals' fervent search for visual satisfaction in the virtual sphere.

It is quite intriguing how the seemingly disparate domains of arson and digital aesthetics have managed to converge in this body of literature, offering unexpected parallels between fiery phenomena and virtual visual pursuits. These findings serve to underscore the multifaceted nature of human interests and motivations, reflecting the intricate interplay between physical and virtual realms.

[[RESULTS]]
The quantitative analysis unveiled a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8909121 between arson incidents in New Mexico and Google searches for "desktop background" over the period 2007 to 2022. The coefficient implies a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena, indicating that as arson events increased, so did the interest in sprucing up digital workspaces with captivating visuals. The coefficient being close to 1 suggests a robust linear association, albeit with some intriguing subtleties to unpack.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7937243 signifies that approximately 79.37% of the variability in desktop background searches can be explained by the variability in arson incidents. This finding underscores the substantial degree of shared variance between the two variables, reinforcing the strength of the identified relationship.
Notably, the p-value of < 0.01 indicates that the correlation observed is statistically significant, firmly establishing the likelihood that this association is not merely a random occurrence.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot visually encapsulates the compelling correlation, serving as a graphic testament to the unexpected bond between arson and digital aesthetic pursuits. This visual representation showcases the tight clustering of data points around the ascending trendline, providing a clear depiction of the synchronous ebb and flow of arson incidents and the quest for visually captivating desktop backgrounds.
The robustness of these statistical findings invites contemplation on the underlying mechanisms driving this curious connection, perhaps illuminating the unsuspected human proclivity to seek digital creative refuge in the midst of fiery phenomena. The implications of these results prompt further exploration into the intriguing interplay between elemental forces and virtual adornments, setting ablaze inquiries into the complex interdependence of seemingly incongruent domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this investigation substantiate the prior research on arson incidents and individual's interest in digital customization, specifically in the realm of desktop backgrounds. The strong positive correlation coefficient of 0.8909121 aligns with the alarming trends in arson occurrences identified by Smith et al. (2015). This echoes the significant economic and social costs highlighted in their study and emphasizes the urgent need for targeted interventions to curb deliberate fire setting. It appears that individuals' quest for visually captivating desktop backgrounds may be intertwined with the prevalence of arson incidents, suggesting a curious convergence between criminal acts and virtual aesthetic preferences.

Drawing on the insights of Doe and Jones (2018), the results of this study underscore the increasing significance of digital aesthetics in shaping individuals' immersive experiences within the virtual realm. The strong linear relationship between arson incidents and desktop background searches, as indicated by the high r-squared value, lends further support to the evolving preferences of internet users for personalizing their digital workspaces. It appears that the allure of arson may have unexpected parallels with the drive to create visually compelling digital environments, transcending the boundaries of physical and virtual realms.

Moreover, delving into non-fiction literature, the comprehensive examination of the psychological underpinnings of arson behaviors by Firestone (2012) provides a lens through which to interpret the unexpected linkage between arson and digital aesthetic pursuits. The p-value of < 0.01 fortifies the statistical significance of this association, lending credence to the complex interplay between cognitive processes and individuals' virtual visual endeavors. This underscores the malleability of human interests and motivations, illuminating the intricate fusion of elemental forces and virtual adornments in the digital era.

In light of these findings, the unexpected connection between arson in New Mexico and Google searches for "desktop background" prompts reflection on the multifaceted nature of human interests, transcending traditional categorizations. The robust statistical support for this association draws attention to the complex interdependence of seemingly disparate domains, setting ablaze inquiries into the intriguing interplay between fiery phenomena and virtual visual aesthetics.

However, the possibility remains that unobserved variables may underlie this association, and as such, further research is warranted to unravel the nuanced mechanisms driving this curious relationship. Nonetheless, these findings invite contemplation on the whimsical interplays within the human psyche and the unexpected convergence of fiery passions and virtual pursuits.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in New Mexico and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Playing with Fire: Arson's Link to Desktop Background Desire

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the intriguing association between arson incidents in New Mexico and Google searches for "desktop background." Utilizing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.8909121 and p < 0.01 was identified for the period spanning from 2007 to 2022. The results reveal a peculiar relationship between acts of arson and individuals' interest in sprucing up their digital workspaces. The implications of these findings and potential causative factors are discussed, shedding light on the unexpected connectivity between fiery phenomena and virtual visual aesthetics.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The prevalence and impact of arson incidents have long been a subject of immense concern and interest within the public sphere, law enforcement agencies, and the research community. Arson, the deliberate and criminal act of setting fire to property, not only inflicts substantial economic and social costs but also poses significant threats to public safety and well-being. In parallel, the pursuit of aesthetic pleasures and the customization of digital workspaces in contemporary society have increasingly become enmeshed in individuals' daily routines. Surprisingly, the intersection of these seemingly disparate domains - arson and desktop background preferences - has garnered attention due to the revelation of an unexpected correlation between these phenomena. This study delves into this unanticipated relationship, seeking to unravel the underlying dynamics and potential implications of the linkage between arson in New Mexico and Google searches for "desktop background."
The juxtaposition of arson and digital aesthetics may at first glance appear peculiar and enigmatic, akin to a matchstick igniting an unexpected burst of creativity in a seemingly unrelated domain. The study aims to explore the nuances of this association by examining data obtained from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services juxtaposed with insights from Google Trends. The emerging correlation reveals an underlying interplay between acts of arson and individuals' proclivity towards embellishing their virtual work environments. This unanticipated association raises intriguing questions about the underlying human motivations and behavioral drivers that intertwine seemingly unrelated pursuits. As we peel back the layers of this curious connection, we are compelled to consider the multifaceted nature of human curiosity, desire, and perhaps even subliminal inclinations that manifest in ways we may not readily comprehend.
Therefore, this paper seeks to elucidate the empirical evidence of the nexus between arson and desktop background pursuits, as well as to provide a platform for pondering the broader implications and potential causative factors underlying this perplexing correlation. The findings unearthed from this investigation offer a unique vantage point from which to contemplate the interplay between physical and virtual domains, thereby unlocking unexpected insights into our collective human predilections and the intricate interweaving of seemingly disparate aspects of modern life. Through this exploration, we aim to ignite further scholarly discourse and spark a conflagration of curiosity in untangling the enigmatic bond between flames and pixels.

[[RESULTS]]
The quantitative analysis unveiled a notable correlation coefficient of 0.8909121 between arson incidents in New Mexico and Google searches for "desktop background" over the period 2007 to 2022. The coefficient implies a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena, indicating that as arson events increased, so did the interest in sprucing up digital workspaces with captivating visuals. The coefficient being close to 1 suggests a robust linear association, albeit with some intriguing subtleties to unpack.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7937243 signifies that approximately 79.37% of the variability in desktop background searches can be explained by the variability in arson incidents. This finding underscores the substantial degree of shared variance between the two variables, reinforcing the strength of the identified relationship.
Notably, the p-value of < 0.01 indicates that the correlation observed is statistically significant, firmly establishing the likelihood that this association is not merely a random occurrence.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot visually encapsulates the compelling correlation, serving as a graphic testament to the unexpected bond between arson and digital aesthetic pursuits. This visual representation showcases the tight clustering of data points around the ascending trendline, providing a clear depiction of the synchronous ebb and flow of arson incidents and the quest for visually captivating desktop backgrounds.
The robustness of these statistical findings invites contemplation on the underlying mechanisms driving this curious connection, perhaps illuminating the unsuspected human proclivity to seek digital creative refuge in the midst of fiery phenomena. The implications of these results prompt further exploration into the intriguing interplay between elemental forces and virtual adornments, setting ablaze inquiries into the complex interdependence of seemingly incongruent domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study unveil a compelling and robust association between arson incidents in New Mexico and Google searches for "desktop background." The correlation coefficient of 0.8909121, accompanied by a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01, underscores the surprising synchrony between these seemingly unrelated spheres. The robustness of these statistical revelations points towards an intriguing interplay between pyrotechnic pursuits and digital aesthetic inclinations.

The unanticipated bond between flames and pixels prompts contemplation on the underlying psychological and behavioral motivations interweaving these disparate realms. One may ponder whether the allure of vibrant desktop backgrounds serves as a subliminal coping mechanism amidst fiery phenomena or as a curious manifestation of human proclivities in the face of adversity.

While our study sheds light on this peculiar correlation, it also kindles fervor for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms and potential causal factors driving this unexpected connection. However, it seems unlikely that any further research would yield a clearer understanding of the nuanced interplay at hand. Therefore, it may be time to let this particular fiery fascination simmer and shift our scholarly gaze towards other unanticipated intersections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Playing with Fire: Arson's Link to Desktop Background Desire. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Pyrokinetic Psychology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Playing with Fire: Arson's Link to Desktop Background Desire. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Pyrographic Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Playing with Fire: Arson's Link to Desktop Background Desire with an abstract of This study investigates the intriguing association between arson incidents in New Mexico and Google searches for "desktop background." Utilizing data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.8909121 and p < 0.01 was identified for the period spanning from 2007 to 2022. The results reveal a peculiar relationship between acts of arson and individuals' interest in sprucing up their digital workspaces. The implications of these findings and potential causative factors are discussed, shedding light on the unexpected connectivity between fiery phenomena and virtual visual aesthetics.

ChatGPT:

arson incidents, arson investigation, arson statistics, arson data, arson causes, arson trends, arson correlation, arson research, Google searches, desktop background, digital workspace, virtual aesthetics, visual aesthetics, correlation coefficient, causative factors

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Arson in New Mexico
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in New Mexico
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in New Mexico

Google searches for 'desktop background'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'desktop background' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'desktop background'

Correlation r = 0.8909121 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7937243 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 79.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'desktop background') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Arson in New Mexico) over the 16 years from 2007 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.7E-6. 0.0000036779713482330057000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 0.00037% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 271,889 random variables You don't actually need 271 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.71, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Arson in New Mexico (Arson rate)2728.822.320.320.921.418.219.915.820.215.914.614.818.816.615.6
Google searches for 'desktop background' (Rel. search volume)81.833386.575.333366.166760.333354.7546.166741.916738.833330.583326.7523.916722.416724.752022.25




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([27,28.8,22.3,20.3,20.9,21.4,18.2,19.9,15.8,20.2,15.9,14.6,14.8,18.8,16.6,15.6,])
array_2 = np.array([81.8333,86.5,75.3333,66.1667,60.3333,54.75,46.1667,41.9167,38.8333,30.5833,26.75,23.9167,22.4167,24.75,20,22.25,])
array_1_name = "Arson in New Mexico"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'desktop background'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 1672 · Black Variable ID: 20058 · Red Variable ID: 1462
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0