Spurious correlation #1,649 · View random
A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the second variable is UFO sightings in Florida. The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Fossil fuel use in Suriname and the second variable is UFO sightings in Florida. The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

Download png, svg

AI explanation

As the fossil fuels were burned in Suriname, they released mysterious and unusual emissions into the atmosphere. These emissions inadvertently acted as a beacon for intergalactic travelers, guiding UFOs towards the Sunshine State. It seems the aliens have a burgeoning interest in fossil fuel emissions as their preferred choice of celestial entertainment.

^{Show image generation prompt} Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image that captures a surreal atmosphere blending the mystique of the Amazon rainforest and the celestial curiosity of an unidentified flying object. In the foreground, the campfire illuminates a group of people gathered in the dense Suriname rainforest. The characters are depicted with muted colors, hinting at their intention and curiosity. The firewood and cooking utensils add depth to the scene, showcasing the group's resourcefulness. In the background, set against the vast Florida night sky, a UFO streaks across the horizon, leaving a trail of sparkling lights in its wake. The dotted halftone pattern from 1960s comic books adds a vintage touch, recreating the intrigue and wonder of witnessing such an extraordinary event. The fusion of nature, human presence, and the unknown creates an evocative composition that invites the viewer to ponder the intersection of worlds. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.

This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Fossil fuel use in Suriname and UFO sightings in Florida. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Voxel art Cutsy graphics A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Symbolism Charcoal
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Fossil fuel use in Suriname and UFO sightings in Florida together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the dense rainforest of Suriname, a group of people gather around a campfire, its flickering flames illuminating their intent faces. They are cooking a meal using firewood collected from the nearby trees, while in the vast Florida night sky above, a mysterious unidentified object zooms by, leaving a trail of sparkling lights in its wake.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In the dense rainforest of Suriname, a group of people gather around a campfire, its flickering flames illuminating their intent faces. They are cooking a meal using firewood collected from the nearby trees, while in the vast Florida night sky above, a mysterious unidentified object zooms by, leaving a trail of sparkling lights in its wake. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image that captures a surreal atmosphere blending the mystique of the Amazon rainforest and the celestial curiosity of an unidentified flying object. In the foreground, the campfire illuminates a group of people gathered in the dense Suriname rainforest. The characters are depicted with muted colors, hinting at their intention and curiosity. The firewood and cooking utensils add depth to the scene, showcasing the group's resourcefulness. In the background, set against the vast Florida night sky, a UFO streaks across the horizon, leaving a trail of sparkling lights in its wake. The dotted halftone pattern from 1960s comic books adds a vintage touch, recreating the intrigue and wonder of witnessing such an extraordinary event. The fusion of nature, human presence, and the unknown creates an evocative composition that invites the viewer to ponder the intersection of worlds.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
^{Show prompt for explanation} Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Fossil fuel use in Suriname caused UFO sightings in Florida to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)

Fueling UFO Fables: The Fossil Fuel-Fueled Florida UFO Phenomenon

The Journal of Extraterrestrial Energy Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!

^{Show prompt used to generate this paper} Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and UFO sightings in Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling UFO Fables: The Fossil Fuel-Fueled Florida UFO Phenomenon

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between fossil fuel use in Suriname and UFO sightings in Florida has long been a subject of derision and disbelief in the scientific community. However, our research team decided to boldly go where no economist has gone before and delve into this enigmatic association. Our study utilized data from the Energy Information Administration and the National UFO Reporting Center to analyze the relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.

Contrary to our expectations, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8839778 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 1980 to 2021. This peculiar correlation suggests a potential link between the burning of fossil fuels in Suriname and the mysterious appearance of unidentified flying objects in the skies of Florida. Could it be that extraterrestrial beings are drawn to the emissions from fossil fuel combustion, or are Floridians more likely to mistake ordinary aircraft for otherworldly visitors after exposure to air pollution?

While our results are certainly thought-provoking, we must urge caution in jumping to otherworldly conclusions. The correlation discovered may be completely coincidental or influenced by confounding variables that have eluded our investigation. Nevertheless, our study illuminates an intriguing area for further research, challenging established paradigms and inviting scholars to consider the cosmic implications of earthly energy practices.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the realm of scientific inquiry, it is a rare privilege to explore the intersection of two seemingly unrelated phenomena and emerge with findings that defy expectations. Our research delves into the shadowy realm of UFO sightings in Florida and the fossil fuel activities in Suriname, a conjunction that has elicited skepticism and raised eyebrows in the scientific community. It is a journey into the unknown, where skepticism meets speculation, and where extraterrestrial enigmas collide with earthly energy consumption.
The debate around UFO sightings and alien encounters can be as intense as the heat emitted from a spacecraft re-entering the Earth's atmosphere. From blurry photographs to dubious eyewitness accounts, the UFO terrain is fertile ground for skepticism, intrigue, and the occasional tin-foil hat enthusiast. On the other hand, the realms of economics and energy production often call to mind complex equations, supply and demand curves, and, if we're being honest, the occasional nap-inducing PowerPoint presentation.
However, it is precisely at this intersection of the otherworldly and the mundanely terrestrial that our research takes flight (pun absolutely intended). With data in one hand and a telescope in the other – figuratively speaking, of course – we set out to explore the enigmatic connection between the consumption of fossil fuels in Suriname and the purported sightings of UFOs in the skies of Florida.
While it may seem like we've embarked on a journey that Captain Kirk and the Starship Enterprise would envy, our aim is to bring rigorous scientific inquiry to a topic that has historically been relegated to late-night conspiracy theory discussions and grainy cable television documentaries. By subjecting this peculiar correlation to rigorous analysis, we hope to shed light on a phenomenon that has long been shrouded in disbelief and skepticism.
In the following sections, we will discuss the methodology, findings, and implications of our study, aiming to fuel both intellectual curiosity and the occasional chuckle as we navigate the cosmic conundrum of the Fossil Fuel-Fueled Florida UFO Phenomenon. So, buckle your seatbelts and prepare for lift-off into the world of scientific exploration that is, quite literally, out of this world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find a significant relationship between fossil fuel consumption in Suriname and atmospheric disturbances in the vicinity of the Bermuda Triangle. However, our focus lies on the unconventional connection between Surinamese fossil fuel use and the ethereal dance of unidentified flying objects above the sunshine state of Florida.

Turning our attention from scientific journals to literature tangentially related to our topic, "The Energy Non-Crisis" by Lindsey Williams sheds light on the clandestine maneuverings of the fossil fuel industry, but fails to mention any extraterrestrial involvement. On the contrary, "UFOs Are Real: Here's the Proof" by Ed Walters provides an enthusiastic account of extraterrestrial encounters, yet disappointingly neglects to address the ecological impact of alien spacecraft propulsion.

Venturing further into the realm of fiction, H.G. Wells' "War of the Worlds" and Arthur C. Clarke's "Childhood's End" present riveting tales of extraterrestrial incursions, but regrettably offer no insights into the proclivities of intergalactic travelers for earthly emissions. It is a striking omission indeed.

On a lighter note, a tweet from @SpaceCadet82 asserts, "Just saw a fleet of UFOs in Florida, must be all the rocket launches messing with the aliens' navigation systems #SpaceTrafficJam." While not a scholarly source by any stretch, the anecdotal evidence adds a layer of levity to our investigation.

As we navigate through this whimsical intersection of fuel and fantasy, we find ourselves intrigued by the web of speculation, half-truths, and unbridled imagination that characterizes this unusual scholarly pursuit. What emerges is a tapestry woven from the threads of fact and fanciful conjecture, where the boundary between serious inquiry and whimsical speculation blurs like the outline of a passing UFO in the night sky.

The literature, though varied in its focus and credibility, fails to offer a comprehensive understanding of the curious correlation we seek to elucidate. However, fear not, dear reader, for our intrepid research aims to unravel the enigmatic connection between terrestrial fuel consumption and celestial visitations, even if it boldly goes where traditional scholarship hesitates to tread.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and UFO sightings in Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and National UFO Reporting Center . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling UFO Fables: The Fossil Fuel-Fueled Florida UFO Phenomenon

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between fossil fuel use in Suriname and UFO sightings in Florida has long been a subject of derision and disbelief in the scientific community. However, our research team decided to boldly go where no economist has gone before and delve into this enigmatic association. Our study utilized data from the Energy Information Administration and the National UFO Reporting Center to analyze the relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.

Contrary to our expectations, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8839778 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 1980 to 2021. This peculiar correlation suggests a potential link between the burning of fossil fuels in Suriname and the mysterious appearance of unidentified flying objects in the skies of Florida. Could it be that extraterrestrial beings are drawn to the emissions from fossil fuel combustion, or are Floridians more likely to mistake ordinary aircraft for otherworldly visitors after exposure to air pollution?

While our results are certainly thought-provoking, we must urge caution in jumping to otherworldly conclusions. The correlation discovered may be completely coincidental or influenced by confounding variables that have eluded our investigation. Nevertheless, our study illuminates an intriguing area for further research, challenging established paradigms and inviting scholars to consider the cosmic implications of earthly energy practices.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the realm of scientific inquiry, it is a rare privilege to explore the intersection of two seemingly unrelated phenomena and emerge with findings that defy expectations. Our research delves into the shadowy realm of UFO sightings in Florida and the fossil fuel activities in Suriname, a conjunction that has elicited skepticism and raised eyebrows in the scientific community. It is a journey into the unknown, where skepticism meets speculation, and where extraterrestrial enigmas collide with earthly energy consumption.
The debate around UFO sightings and alien encounters can be as intense as the heat emitted from a spacecraft re-entering the Earth's atmosphere. From blurry photographs to dubious eyewitness accounts, the UFO terrain is fertile ground for skepticism, intrigue, and the occasional tin-foil hat enthusiast. On the other hand, the realms of economics and energy production often call to mind complex equations, supply and demand curves, and, if we're being honest, the occasional nap-inducing PowerPoint presentation.
However, it is precisely at this intersection of the otherworldly and the mundanely terrestrial that our research takes flight (pun absolutely intended). With data in one hand and a telescope in the other – figuratively speaking, of course – we set out to explore the enigmatic connection between the consumption of fossil fuels in Suriname and the purported sightings of UFOs in the skies of Florida.
While it may seem like we've embarked on a journey that Captain Kirk and the Starship Enterprise would envy, our aim is to bring rigorous scientific inquiry to a topic that has historically been relegated to late-night conspiracy theory discussions and grainy cable television documentaries. By subjecting this peculiar correlation to rigorous analysis, we hope to shed light on a phenomenon that has long been shrouded in disbelief and skepticism.
In the following sections, we will discuss the methodology, findings, and implications of our study, aiming to fuel both intellectual curiosity and the occasional chuckle as we navigate the cosmic conundrum of the Fossil Fuel-Fueled Florida UFO Phenomenon. So, buckle your seatbelts and prepare for lift-off into the world of scientific exploration that is, quite literally, out of this world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To tackle the titillating mystery of the Fossil Fuel-Fueled Florida UFO Phenomenon, our research team employed a methodological approach that was as rigorous as it was, dare we say, out of this world. Our investigation involved a blend of traditional econometric analysis, cosmic speculation, and a healthy dose of good old-fashioned curiosity.

**Data Collection**
Our data collection process resembled a treasure hunt across the vast expanse of the internet, as we scoured sources ranging from the Energy Information Administration to the National UFO Reporting Center. We combed through decades of data, from 1980 to 2021, extracting information on Suriname's fossil fuel use and Florida's UFO sightings with the precision of an extraterrestrial tractor beam.

**Econometric Analysis**
Applying traditional econometric methods to unearth the potential relationship between fossil fuel consumption in Suriname and UFO sightings in Florida, we utilized statistical tools that were as reliable as an alien abduction story on a late-night talk show. This included time-series analysis, regression models, and diagnostic tests, which allowed us to probe the depths of this enigmatic connection with a level of scrutiny that would make Mulder and Scully proud.

**Speculative Probing**
In addition to our robust econometric analysis, we bravely ventured into the speculative unknown, considering hypothetical mechanisms that could underpin the observed correlation. This included pondering whether extraterrestrial beings possess an inexplicable affinity for the emissions of fossil fuel combustion or if Floridians, under the influence of air pollution, are simply more likely to mistake conventional aircraft for cosmic interlopers.

**Cosmic Calibration**
To ensure that our findings resonated with the cosmic conundrum at hand, we calibrated our analysis with a telescope in one hand (figuratively speaking, of course) and a cosmic compass in the other. While these metaphorical instruments may not have provided tangible data, they served as a reminder of the intergalactic implications of our research – and as entertaining conversation pieces at departmental seminars.

**Confounder Consideration**
In the spirit of thorough inquiry, we also scrutinized potential confounding variables that could confound our analysis. After all, in a study that traverses the celestial and terrestrial, one must be attentive to the gravitational pull of alternative explanations and unseen cosmic forces.

From the depths of traditional statistical analysis to the heights of speculative pondering, our methodology sought to unveil the cosmic threads that entwine the fossil fuel activities in Suriname with the curious sightings of UFOs in Florida. This blend of precision, speculation, and a touch of cosmic curiosity propelled our investigation into the realm of scholarly inquiry that is, quite literally, out of this world.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and UFO sightings in Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and National UFO Reporting Center .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8839778, r-squared of 0.7814168, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling UFO Fables: The Fossil Fuel-Fueled Florida UFO Phenomenon

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between fossil fuel use in Suriname and UFO sightings in Florida has long been a subject of derision and disbelief in the scientific community. However, our research team decided to boldly go where no economist has gone before and delve into this enigmatic association. Our study utilized data from the Energy Information Administration and the National UFO Reporting Center to analyze the relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.

Contrary to our expectations, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8839778 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 1980 to 2021. This peculiar correlation suggests a potential link between the burning of fossil fuels in Suriname and the mysterious appearance of unidentified flying objects in the skies of Florida. Could it be that extraterrestrial beings are drawn to the emissions from fossil fuel combustion, or are Floridians more likely to mistake ordinary aircraft for otherworldly visitors after exposure to air pollution?

While our results are certainly thought-provoking, we must urge caution in jumping to otherworldly conclusions. The correlation discovered may be completely coincidental or influenced by confounding variables that have eluded our investigation. Nevertheless, our study illuminates an intriguing area for further research, challenging established paradigms and inviting scholars to consider the cosmic implications of earthly energy practices.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
In the realm of scientific inquiry, it is a rare privilege to explore the intersection of two seemingly unrelated phenomena and emerge with findings that defy expectations. Our research delves into the shadowy realm of UFO sightings in Florida and the fossil fuel activities in Suriname, a conjunction that has elicited skepticism and raised eyebrows in the scientific community. It is a journey into the unknown, where skepticism meets speculation, and where extraterrestrial enigmas collide with earthly energy consumption.
The debate around UFO sightings and alien encounters can be as intense as the heat emitted from a spacecraft re-entering the Earth's atmosphere. From blurry photographs to dubious eyewitness accounts, the UFO terrain is fertile ground for skepticism, intrigue, and the occasional tin-foil hat enthusiast. On the other hand, the realms of economics and energy production often call to mind complex equations, supply and demand curves, and, if we're being honest, the occasional nap-inducing PowerPoint presentation.
However, it is precisely at this intersection of the otherworldly and the mundanely terrestrial that our research takes flight (pun absolutely intended). With data in one hand and a telescope in the other – figuratively speaking, of course – we set out to explore the enigmatic connection between the consumption of fossil fuels in Suriname and the purported sightings of UFOs in the skies of Florida.
While it may seem like we've embarked on a journey that Captain Kirk and the Starship Enterprise would envy, our aim is to bring rigorous scientific inquiry to a topic that has historically been relegated to late-night conspiracy theory discussions and grainy cable television documentaries. By subjecting this peculiar correlation to rigorous analysis, we hope to shed light on a phenomenon that has long been shrouded in disbelief and skepticism.
In the following sections, we will discuss the methodology, findings, and implications of our study, aiming to fuel both intellectual curiosity and the occasional chuckle as we navigate the cosmic conundrum of the Fossil Fuel-Fueled Florida UFO Phenomenon. So, buckle your seatbelts and prepare for lift-off into the world of scientific exploration that is, quite literally, out of this world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]

ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation ventured into uncharted territory, examining the purported connection between fossil fuel use in Suriname and UFO sightings in Florida. The statistical analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and the National UFO Reporting Center unearthed a surprising revelation: a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8839778, an r-squared of 0.7814168, and a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 1980 to 2021.

Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that visually encapsulates this remarkable correlation—an otherworldly relationship indeed. The scatterplot graphically illustrates the eerie synergy between fossil fuel use in Suriname and the frequency of UFO sightings in the Floridian skies, leaving us both perplexed and entertained by the cosmic dance of data points.

The presence of such a robust correlation not only raises eyebrows but also evokes a plethora of questions. Could there be a cosmic conspiracy at play, drawing extraterrestrial beings to the emissions from fossil fuel combustion? Or perhaps Floridians, after prolonged exposure to air pollution from Suriname, are prone to misidentifying ordinary aircraft as celestial visitors, eliciting tales of UFO sightings that captivate believers and skeptics alike?

These findings - as peculiar as they may seem - do not come without their theoretical and practical implications. At the very least, our study challenges conventional wisdom and beckons the scientific community to ponder the cosmic implications of earthly energy practices, all while raising a quizzical eyebrow and a knowing wink in the direction of the unknown.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and UFO sightings in Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Fueling UFO Fables: The Fossil Fuel-Fueled Florida UFO Phenomenon

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between fossil fuel use in Suriname and UFO sightings in Florida has long been a subject of derision and disbelief in the scientific community. However, our research team decided to boldly go where no economist has gone before and delve into this enigmatic association. Our study utilized data from the Energy Information Administration and the National UFO Reporting Center to analyze the relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.

Contrary to our expectations, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8839778 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 1980 to 2021. This peculiar correlation suggests a potential link between the burning of fossil fuels in Suriname and the mysterious appearance of unidentified flying objects in the skies of Florida. Could it be that extraterrestrial beings are drawn to the emissions from fossil fuel combustion, or are Floridians more likely to mistake ordinary aircraft for otherworldly visitors after exposure to air pollution?

While our results are certainly thought-provoking, we must urge caution in jumping to otherworldly conclusions. The correlation discovered may be completely coincidental or influenced by confounding variables that have eluded our investigation. Nevertheless, our study illuminates an intriguing area for further research, challenging established paradigms and inviting scholars to consider the cosmic implications of earthly energy practices.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a significant relationship between fossil fuel consumption in Suriname and atmospheric disturbances in the vicinity of the Bermuda Triangle. However, our focus lies on the unconventional connection between Surinamese fossil fuel use and the ethereal dance of unidentified flying objects above the sunshine state of Florida.
Turning our attention from scientific journals to literature tangentially related to our topic, "The Energy Non-Crisis" by Lindsey Williams sheds light on the clandestine maneuverings of the fossil fuel industry, but fails to mention any extraterrestrial involvement. On the contrary, "UFOs Are Real: Here's the Proof" by Ed Walters provides an enthusiastic account of extraterrestrial encounters, yet disappointingly neglects to address the ecological impact of alien spacecraft propulsion.
Venturing further into the realm of fiction, H.G. Wells' "War of the Worlds" and Arthur C. Clarke's "Childhood's End" present riveting tales of extraterrestrial incursions, but regrettably offer no insights into the proclivities of intergalactic travelers for earthly emissions. It is a striking omission indeed.
On a lighter note, a tweet from @SpaceCadet82 asserts, "Just saw a fleet of UFOs in Florida, must be all the rocket launches messing with the aliens' navigation systems #SpaceTrafficJam." While not a scholarly source by any stretch, the anecdotal evidence adds a layer of levity to our investigation.
As we navigate through this whimsical intersection of fuel and fantasy, we find ourselves intrigued by the web of speculation, half-truths, and unbridled imagination that characterizes this unusual scholarly pursuit. What emerges is a tapestry woven from the threads of fact and fanciful conjecture, where the boundary between serious inquiry and whimsical speculation blurs like the outline of a passing UFO in the night sky.
The literature, though varied in its focus and credibility, fails to offer a comprehensive understanding of the curious correlation we seek to elucidate. However, fear not, dear reader, for our intrepid research aims to unravel the enigmatic connection between terrestrial fuel consumption and celestial visitations, even if it boldly goes where traditional scholarship hesitates to tread.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation ventured into uncharted territory, examining the purported connection between fossil fuel use in Suriname and UFO sightings in Florida. The statistical analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and the National UFO Reporting Center unearthed a surprising revelation: a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8839778, an r-squared of 0.7814168, and a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 1980 to 2021.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that visually encapsulates this remarkable correlation—an otherworldly relationship indeed. The scatterplot graphically illustrates the eerie synergy between fossil fuel use in Suriname and the frequency of UFO sightings in the Floridian skies, leaving us both perplexed and entertained by the cosmic dance of data points.
The presence of such a robust correlation not only raises eyebrows but also evokes a plethora of questions. Could there be a cosmic conspiracy at play, drawing extraterrestrial beings to the emissions from fossil fuel combustion? Or perhaps Floridians, after prolonged exposure to air pollution from Suriname, are prone to misidentifying ordinary aircraft as celestial visitors, eliciting tales of UFO sightings that captivate believers and skeptics alike?
These findings - as peculiar as they may seem - do not come without their theoretical and practical implications. At the very least, our study challenges conventional wisdom and beckons the scientific community to ponder the cosmic implications of earthly energy practices, all while raising a quizzical eyebrow and a knowing wink in the direction of the unknown.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our results offer tantalizing evidence of a potential linkage between the consumption of fossil fuels in Suriname and the fabled sightings of UFOs in Florida. The remarkably high correlation coefficient and significant p-value corroborate the prior work of Smith et al., who also identified connections between Surinamese fossil fuel use and atmospheric disturbances in the Bermuda Triangle. What a revelation - who knew that the otherworldly phenomena in the skies might be tied to earthly energy practices?

Delving into the literature review, we find ourselves revisiting the whimsical tweet from @SpaceCadet82, which mused about the potential impact of rocket launches on alien navigation systems. Little did we know that this anecdotal comment would lead us down the path of statistical inquiry, hinting at a potential real-world correlation between earthly energy activities and extraterrestrial visitations. It appears that even the musings of amateur stargazers can contribute to the body of scientific knowledge!

Moreover, the absence of scholarly insight from H.G. Wells and Arthur C. Clarke regarding intergalactic travelers' propensities for earthly emissions now seems like a missed opportunity for scientific inquiry. Who's to say that the Martians in "War of the Worlds" weren't actually attracted to coal-fired power plants? These oversights now take on a whole new significance in light of our findings.

Our study, while rooted in statistical analysis and scientific rigor, has serendipitously given credence to seemingly outlandish connections between fuel consumption and ethereal encounters. As we ponder the cosmic implications of our results, we cannot help but reflect on the mysterious allure of UFO sightings in Florida and the potential role of fossil fuel emissions. Could it be that extraterrestrial beings are indeed drawn to the emissions from fossil fuel combustion, or are Floridians more likely to mistake ordinary aircraft for otherworldly visitors after exposure to air pollution?

So, as we conclude this discussion (pun intended), we are left with a conundrum fit for the ages. Our research has illuminated a strange and awe-inspiring link, challenging conventional wisdom and beckoning the scientific community to consider the interplay between terrestrial activities and celestial phenomena. This peculiar connection not only invites further scholarly inquiry but also leaves us marveling at the enigmatic dance of data points that has unfolded before us. The cosmos indeed holds many mysteries, and it seems our earthly endeavors may have attracted the attention of the great beyond in ways we never anticipated.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Suriname and UFO sightings in Florida. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fueling UFO Fables: The Fossil Fuel-Fueled Florida UFO Phenomenon

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between fossil fuel use in Suriname and UFO sightings in Florida has long been a subject of derision and disbelief in the scientific community. However, our research team decided to boldly go where no economist has gone before and delve into this enigmatic association. Our study utilized data from the Energy Information Administration and the National UFO Reporting Center to analyze the relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.

Contrary to our expectations, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8839778 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 1980 to 2021. This peculiar correlation suggests a potential link between the burning of fossil fuels in Suriname and the mysterious appearance of unidentified flying objects in the skies of Florida. Could it be that extraterrestrial beings are drawn to the emissions from fossil fuel combustion, or are Floridians more likely to mistake ordinary aircraft for otherworldly visitors after exposure to air pollution?

While our results are certainly thought-provoking, we must urge caution in jumping to otherworldly conclusions. The correlation discovered may be completely coincidental or influenced by confounding variables that have eluded our investigation. Nevertheless, our study illuminates an intriguing area for further research, challenging established paradigms and inviting scholars to consider the cosmic implications of earthly energy practices.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
In the realm of scientific inquiry, it is a rare privilege to explore the intersection of two seemingly unrelated phenomena and emerge with findings that defy expectations. Our research delves into the shadowy realm of UFO sightings in Florida and the fossil fuel activities in Suriname, a conjunction that has elicited skepticism and raised eyebrows in the scientific community. It is a journey into the unknown, where skepticism meets speculation, and where extraterrestrial enigmas collide with earthly energy consumption.
The debate around UFO sightings and alien encounters can be as intense as the heat emitted from a spacecraft re-entering the Earth's atmosphere. From blurry photographs to dubious eyewitness accounts, the UFO terrain is fertile ground for skepticism, intrigue, and the occasional tin-foil hat enthusiast. On the other hand, the realms of economics and energy production often call to mind complex equations, supply and demand curves, and, if we're being honest, the occasional nap-inducing PowerPoint presentation.
However, it is precisely at this intersection of the otherworldly and the mundanely terrestrial that our research takes flight (pun absolutely intended). With data in one hand and a telescope in the other – figuratively speaking, of course – we set out to explore the enigmatic connection between the consumption of fossil fuels in Suriname and the purported sightings of UFOs in the skies of Florida.
While it may seem like we've embarked on a journey that Captain Kirk and the Starship Enterprise would envy, our aim is to bring rigorous scientific inquiry to a topic that has historically been relegated to late-night conspiracy theory discussions and grainy cable television documentaries. By subjecting this peculiar correlation to rigorous analysis, we hope to shed light on a phenomenon that has long been shrouded in disbelief and skepticism.
In the following sections, we will discuss the methodology, findings, and implications of our study, aiming to fuel both intellectual curiosity and the occasional chuckle as we navigate the cosmic conundrum of the Fossil Fuel-Fueled Florida UFO Phenomenon. So, buckle your seatbelts and prepare for lift-off into the world of scientific exploration that is, quite literally, out of this world.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation ventured into uncharted territory, examining the purported connection between fossil fuel use in Suriname and UFO sightings in Florida. The statistical analysis of data from the Energy Information Administration and the National UFO Reporting Center unearthed a surprising revelation: a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.8839778, an r-squared of 0.7814168, and a p-value of less than 0.01 over the period spanning from 1980 to 2021.
Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot that visually encapsulates this remarkable correlation—an otherworldly relationship indeed. The scatterplot graphically illustrates the eerie synergy between fossil fuel use in Suriname and the frequency of UFO sightings in the Floridian skies, leaving us both perplexed and entertained by the cosmic dance of data points.
The presence of such a robust correlation not only raises eyebrows but also evokes a plethora of questions. Could there be a cosmic conspiracy at play, drawing extraterrestrial beings to the emissions from fossil fuel combustion? Or perhaps Floridians, after prolonged exposure to air pollution from Suriname, are prone to misidentifying ordinary aircraft as celestial visitors, eliciting tales of UFO sightings that captivate believers and skeptics alike?
These findings - as peculiar as they may seem - do not come without their theoretical and practical implications. At the very least, our study challenges conventional wisdom and beckons the scientific community to ponder the cosmic implications of earthly energy practices, all while raising a quizzical eyebrow and a knowing wink in the direction of the unknown.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]

ChatGPT:

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our study has steered us through the cosmic conundrum of the Fossil Fuel-Fueled Florida UFO Phenomenon, uncovering a correlation that is as mystifying as it is entertaining. The statistically significant relationship between Suriname's fossil fuel use and Florida's UFO sightings has left us pondering whether aliens are true aficionados of carbon emissions or if Floridians have a penchant for mistaking aircraft for intergalactic visitors after a hearty dose of air pollution.

While our findings may seem out of this world, we must exercise caution before hailing the arrival of our extraterrestrial neighbors or launching a UFO-themed music festival. The correlation observed may be purely coincidental or influenced by confounding factors that elude our understanding – and let's face it, the universe loves a good mystery.

It is clear that our results open the portal to a realm of inquiry that exists at the intersection of skepticism and speculation, challenging us to consider the cosmic implications of earthly energy practices. However, in the spirit of scientific inquiry – and to preserve our professional reputations – we must acknowledge the need for further research to corroborate and expand upon our findings.

That being said, let's not embark on an interstellar quest for more data just yet. Perhaps it's best to leave this curious correlation hanging in the cosmic breeze, where it can serve as a cautionary tale against jumping to otherworldly conclusions based on statistical quirkiness. For now, let's stow our telescopes and embolden ourselves to seek greater scientific enlightenment from more earthly endeavors. As the great minds of our time once said, "keep looking up, but mind the statistics."

In the spirit of academic diligence and maintaining scientific sanity, it is with a sense of responsibility and a hint of relief that we tentatively assert: no more research is needed in this peculiar and perplexing area.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fueling UFO Fables: The Fossil Fuel-Fueled Florida UFO Phenomenon. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Extraterrestrial Energy Studies

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fueling UFO Fables: The Fossil Fuel-Fueled Florida UFO Phenomenon. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Extraterrestrial Enigma Studies

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fueling UFO Fables: The Fossil Fuel-Fueled Florida UFO Phenomenon with an abstract of The connection between fossil fuel use in Suriname and UFO sightings in Florida has long been a subject of derision and disbelief in the scientific community. However, our research team decided to boldly go where no economist has gone before and delve into this enigmatic association. Our study utilized data from the Energy Information Administration and the National UFO Reporting Center to analyze the relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
Contrary to our expectations, our findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8839778 and a significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period from 1980 to 2021. This peculiar correlation suggests a potential link between the burning of fossil fuels in Suriname and the mysterious appearance of unidentified flying objects in the skies of Florida. Could it be that extraterrestrial beings are drawn to the emissions from fossil fuel combustion, or are Floridians more likely to mistake ordinary aircraft for otherworldly visitors after exposure to air pollution?
While our results are certainly thought-provoking, we must urge caution in jumping to otherworldly conclusions. The correlation discovered may be completely coincidental or influenced by confounding variables that have eluded our investigation. Nevertheless, our study illuminates an intriguing area for further research, challenging established paradigms and inviting scholars to consider the cosmic implications of earthly energy practices.

ChatGPT:

fossil fuel use, Suriname, UFO sightings, Florida, correlation, fossil fuel combustion, unidentified flying objects, emissions, burning fossil fuels, air pollution, correlation coefficient, National UFO Reporting Center, energy practices, cosmic implications

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.

Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error

Data details

Fossil fuel use in Suriname
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Suriname in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Suriname

UFO sightings in Florida
Detailed data title: UFO sightings reported in Florida
Source: National UFO Reporting Center
See what else correlates with UFO sightings in Florida

Correlation r = 0.8839778 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r² = 0.7814168 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 78.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., UFO sightings in Florida) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Suriname) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.7E-15.^Show 0.0000000000000087346007025134
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme.^Note More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.88 in 8.7E-13% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 114,487,202,570,376 random variables^Note You don't actually need 114 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, ^Note Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
^{Read more about the confidence interval} The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!

All values for the years included above: ^Note If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.

	1980	1981	1982	1983	1984	1985	1986	1987	1988	1989	1990	1991	1992	1993	1994	1995	1996	1997	1998	1999	2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021
Fossil fuel use in Suriname (Billion kWh)	0.641	0.499	0.253	0.363	0.262	0.21	0.411	0.348	0.402	0.256	0.33	0.289	0.289	0.3	0.307	0.315	0.125	0.125	0.127	0.129	0.687	0.691	0.69	0.692	0.693	0.697	0.701	0.701	0.701	0.703	0.48316	0.8554	1.07066	1.08758	1.36582	1.45982	1.11766	0.94282	0.88266	0.98794	0.938013	0.998046
UFO sightings in Florida (UFO sightings)	8	10	5	7	7	17	8	12	13	15	11	7	12	9	20	19	30	47	100	102	115	137	145	202	194	233	205	254	284	240	215	329	440	519	610	449	347	323	213	339	349	155

Why this works

Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
Lack of causal connection: There is probably^Note Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple^Note Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.

Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. ^{Show the steps to do this.} Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."

# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.641,0.499,0.253,0.363,0.262,0.21,0.411,0.348,0.402,0.256,0.33,0.289,0.289,0.3,0.307,0.315,0.125,0.125,0.127,0.129,0.687,0.691,0.69,0.692,0.693,0.697,0.701,0.701,0.701,0.703,0.48316,0.8554,1.07066,1.08758,1.36582,1.45982,1.11766,0.94282,0.88266,0.98794,0.938013,0.998046,])
array_2 = np.array([8,10,5,7,7,17,8,12,13,15,11,7,12,9,20,19,30,47,100,102,115,137,145,202,194,233,205,254,284,240,215,329,440,519,610,449,347,323,213,339,349,155,])
array_1_name = "Fossil fuel use in Suriname"
array_2_name = "UFO sightings in Florida"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)

Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. ^Note Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:

High resolution line chart ^Note The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.

If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.

Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape.
High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
Alternative high resolution line chart
Scatterplot
Portable line chart (png)
Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
Line chart for only Fossil fuel use in Suriname
Line chart for only UFO sightings in Florida
AI-generated correlation image
The spurious research paper: Fueling UFO Fables: The Fossil Fuel-Fueled Florida UFO Phenomenon

View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!

Correlation ID: 1649 · Black Variable ID: 24004 · Red Variable ID: 1149


Problem variable:
Issue:
Additional details: Optional
Confirm you are a human: