about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,644 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Milk consumption and the second variable is Robberies in Pennsylvania.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The cows in Pennsylvania formed a neighborhood watch and started patrolling the streets, udderly deterring any would-be robbers. With their moovement, they were able to milk the situation for all it was worth, leaving the thieves utterly cowed and unable to dairy to commit any crimes. It seems that when it comes to reducing robberies, the stakes are high and the steaks are rare, but in this case, it's just a case of dairy air leading to a safer dairy state. Remember, it's a pasturely known fact that when there's a lack of lactose, there's also a lack of law loss.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie, depicting a bustling Pennsylvania town where a group of people gather at a local convenience store, purchasing cartons of milk. In the background, a police car speeds by, responding to a reported robbery at a nearby bank. The sky is clear and the sun is shining, casting warm golden rays over the charming small town. The store's exterior features a classic red and white facade, with colorful flowers in window boxes. The people are depicted with diverse expressions and unique character designs, each carrying their own carton of milk. The police car is brightly colored with flashing lights and the town's iconic landmarks can be seen in the distance, giving a sense of community and familiarity. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Milk consumption and Robberies in Pennsylvania. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Whimsical illustration Scalar art Charcoal Glitch art
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Milk consumption and Robberies in Pennsylvania together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Pennsylvania town, a group of people gather at a local convenience store, purchasing cartons of milk. In the background, a police car speeds by, responding to a reported robbery at a nearby bank.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Pennsylvania town, a group of people gather at a local convenience store, purchasing cartons of milk. In the background, a police car speeds by, responding to a reported robbery at a nearby bank. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie, depicting a bustling Pennsylvania town where a group of people gather at a local convenience store, purchasing cartons of milk. In the background, a police car speeds by, responding to a reported robbery at a nearby bank. The sky is clear and the sun is shining, casting warm golden rays over the charming small town. The store's exterior features a classic red and white facade, with colorful flowers in window boxes. The people are depicted with diverse expressions and unique character designs, each carrying their own carton of milk. The police car is brightly colored with flashing lights and the town's iconic landmarks can be seen in the distance, giving a sense of community and familiarity.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Milk consumption caused Robberies in Pennsylvania to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Dairy Dilemma: Milk Consumption and Robbery Rates in Pennsylvania

The Journal of Agrarian Economics and Criminal Justice

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Robberies in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9635588 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Dairy Dilemma: Milk Consumption and Robbery Rates in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
This udderly intriguing study delves into the surprising relationship between milk consumption and robbery rates in the state of Pennsylvania. The research team utilized data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to investigate this curious correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9635588 and p < 0.01 spanning the years 1990 to 2021, our findings are nothing to cry over spilt milk.

The results of our study reveal a statistically significant positive association between the per capita milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania. This unexpected link raises the question: "Got milk, got crimes?" Our analysis suggests that an increase in milk consumption is indeed associated with a rise in robbery incidents, a phenomena that may be coined, "The Milk Bandit Effect."

At the risk of sounding cheesy, our research suggests that the relationship between milk consumption and crime rates may be more than a mere dairy coincidence. The implications of these findings are not just a case of "whole" or "skim" evidence, but rather a reminder to approach data analysis with a discerning eye.

In conclusion, this study sheds light on an illuminating connection between milk consumption and robberies in Pennsylvania and provides food for thought in understanding societal influences on criminal behavior. It leaves us pondering: "Do criminals really cry over spilt milk, or do they just make a quick getaway?"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Robberies in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Dairy Dilemma: Milk Consumption and Robbery Rates in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
This udderly intriguing study delves into the surprising relationship between milk consumption and robbery rates in the state of Pennsylvania. The research team utilized data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to investigate this curious correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9635588 and p < 0.01 spanning the years 1990 to 2021, our findings are nothing to cry over spilt milk.

The results of our study reveal a statistically significant positive association between the per capita milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania. This unexpected link raises the question: "Got milk, got crimes?" Our analysis suggests that an increase in milk consumption is indeed associated with a rise in robbery incidents, a phenomena that may be coined, "The Milk Bandit Effect."

At the risk of sounding cheesy, our research suggests that the relationship between milk consumption and crime rates may be more than a mere dairy coincidence. The implications of these findings are not just a case of "whole" or "skim" evidence, but rather a reminder to approach data analysis with a discerning eye.

In conclusion, this study sheds light on an illuminating connection between milk consumption and robberies in Pennsylvania and provides food for thought in understanding societal influences on criminal behavior. It leaves us pondering: "Do criminals really cry over spilt milk, or do they just make a quick getaway?"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between dietary habits and societal trends has long been an area of interest and speculation. In recent years, studies have increasingly examined the potential association between food consumption and crime rates, seeking to unravel the mysteries of human behavior. Building upon this line of inquiry, the present research explores the intriguing link between milk consumption and robbery rates in the state of Pennsylvania.

Whipping up a delicious blend of statistical analysis and dairy humor, this study aims to elucidate whether there is a legitimate correlation between milk intake and criminal activity. We aim to milk this topic for all its worth, carefully curdling through the data to determine if there is indeed a direct cheese-to-crime connection.

Are you ready for a pun-laden journey into the world of correlation and criminal conduct? Well, grab a glass of milk and let's dive into the compelling findings that emerged from our rigorous analysis. It's time to separate the whey from the curds and dispel the myths surrounding this thought-provoking relationship.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Robberies in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Dairy Dilemma: Milk Consumption and Robbery Rates in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
This udderly intriguing study delves into the surprising relationship between milk consumption and robbery rates in the state of Pennsylvania. The research team utilized data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to investigate this curious correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9635588 and p < 0.01 spanning the years 1990 to 2021, our findings are nothing to cry over spilt milk.

The results of our study reveal a statistically significant positive association between the per capita milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania. This unexpected link raises the question: "Got milk, got crimes?" Our analysis suggests that an increase in milk consumption is indeed associated with a rise in robbery incidents, a phenomena that may be coined, "The Milk Bandit Effect."

At the risk of sounding cheesy, our research suggests that the relationship between milk consumption and crime rates may be more than a mere dairy coincidence. The implications of these findings are not just a case of "whole" or "skim" evidence, but rather a reminder to approach data analysis with a discerning eye.

In conclusion, this study sheds light on an illuminating connection between milk consumption and robberies in Pennsylvania and provides food for thought in understanding societal influences on criminal behavior. It leaves us pondering: "Do criminals really cry over spilt milk, or do they just make a quick getaway?"

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between dietary habits and societal trends has long been an area of interest and speculation. In recent years, studies have increasingly examined the potential association between food consumption and crime rates, seeking to unravel the mysteries of human behavior. Building upon this line of inquiry, the present research explores the intriguing link between milk consumption and robbery rates in the state of Pennsylvania.
Whipping up a delicious blend of statistical analysis and dairy humor, this study aims to elucidate whether there is a legitimate correlation between milk intake and criminal activity. We aim to milk this topic for all its worth, carefully curdling through the data to determine if there is indeed a direct cheese-to-crime connection.
Are you ready for a pun-laden journey into the world of correlation and criminal conduct? Well, grab a glass of milk and let's dive into the compelling findings that emerged from our rigorous analysis. It's time to separate the whey from the curds and dispel the myths surrounding this thought-provoking relationship.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The existing literature on the relationship between dietary habits and societal behavior provides a valuable foundation for investigating the intriguing link between milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania. Smith et al. (2015) found a positive correlation between dairy intake and criminal activity in urban populations, laying the groundwork for further exploration in this area. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) suggested a potential link between calcium-rich foods and aggressive behavior, hinting at a potential dairy dilemma that merits deeper investigation.

In "Milk and Misdeeds: Exploring the Dairy-Crime Connection," the authors delve into the historical patterns of milk consumption and criminal activity, unearthing surprising parallels that challenge conventional wisdom. Their analysis suggests that lactose-induced aggressions may be worth further scrutiny, and perhaps even a curfew on dairy products in certain regions. It's clear that the calcium content in milk may not be the only thing "getting into people's bones."

Drawing inspiration from non-fiction works, "Milk: The White Scandal" and "Got Milked? The Cows Strike Back," shed light on the dark underbelly of the dairy industry and its potential impact on societal behavior. These books highlight the complexities of milk consumption and its implications for human conduct, raising pertinent questions about the role of lactose in the proverbial "cereal" killer.

Turning to fictional narratives, "The Milkman Murders" and "Dairy of a Madman" offer a whimsical yet thought-provoking exploration of the dairy-crime connection in their respective plots. While fictional in nature, these narratives offer imaginative interpretations of the potential repercussions of excessive lactose consumption, adding a dash of intrigue to the scholarly discourse.

In addition, notable TV shows such as "Milk Mysteries" and "Criminal Dairy Investigations" provide a unique perspective on the intersection of dairy products and criminal activity, offering dramatized narratives that captivate audiences while raising provocative questions about the potential influence of milk on law enforcement dynamics. These shows offer an entertaining yet insightful glimpse into the intersection of milk and mayhem, further fueling our curiosity about the dairy-crime correlation.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Robberies in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1990 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Dairy Dilemma: Milk Consumption and Robbery Rates in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
This udderly intriguing study delves into the surprising relationship between milk consumption and robbery rates in the state of Pennsylvania. The research team utilized data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to investigate this curious correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9635588 and p < 0.01 spanning the years 1990 to 2021, our findings are nothing to cry over spilt milk.

The results of our study reveal a statistically significant positive association between the per capita milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania. This unexpected link raises the question: "Got milk, got crimes?" Our analysis suggests that an increase in milk consumption is indeed associated with a rise in robbery incidents, a phenomena that may be coined, "The Milk Bandit Effect."

At the risk of sounding cheesy, our research suggests that the relationship between milk consumption and crime rates may be more than a mere dairy coincidence. The implications of these findings are not just a case of "whole" or "skim" evidence, but rather a reminder to approach data analysis with a discerning eye.

In conclusion, this study sheds light on an illuminating connection between milk consumption and robberies in Pennsylvania and provides food for thought in understanding societal influences on criminal behavior. It leaves us pondering: "Do criminals really cry over spilt milk, or do they just make a quick getaway?"

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between dietary habits and societal trends has long been an area of interest and speculation. In recent years, studies have increasingly examined the potential association between food consumption and crime rates, seeking to unravel the mysteries of human behavior. Building upon this line of inquiry, the present research explores the intriguing link between milk consumption and robbery rates in the state of Pennsylvania.
Whipping up a delicious blend of statistical analysis and dairy humor, this study aims to elucidate whether there is a legitimate correlation between milk intake and criminal activity. We aim to milk this topic for all its worth, carefully curdling through the data to determine if there is indeed a direct cheese-to-crime connection.
Are you ready for a pun-laden journey into the world of correlation and criminal conduct? Well, grab a glass of milk and let's dive into the compelling findings that emerged from our rigorous analysis. It's time to separate the whey from the curds and dispel the myths surrounding this thought-provoking relationship.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the potential association between milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania, a methodologically robust approach was adopted. This involved the collection and analysis of data spanning the years 1990 to 2021 from reputable sources such as the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Criminal Justice Information Services. The data obtained included annual per capita milk consumption in gallons and the number of reported robbery incidents in Pennsylvania.

The initial step in this dairy-driven adventure involved the careful extraction of milk consumption data from the USDA's records. This process was as meticulous as separating the cream from the milk, ensuring that only reliable and accurate figures were included in the analysis. The FBI's records on reported robbery incidents were similarly scrutinized, with thorough attention paid to identifying and eliminating any potential sources of bias or error.

Once the data had been gathered, the research team embarked on a painstaking endeavor to clean, homogenize, and pasteurize the datasets. This rigorous process involved rigorous filtering to ensure that only the creamiest, most representative data points were retained for further analysis. As we all know, when it comes to statistical analysis, the stakes are high, but the curdles are higher.

The correlation between milk consumption and robbery rates was evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient, a stalwart statistical measure of association. This analysis aimed to ascertain the strength and direction of the relationship between these variables, allowing for a deeper understanding of the potential link between dairy products and criminal activity. This process was conducted with utmost precision, leaving no room for lactose tolerance to skew the findings.

In line with best practices in statistical analysis, the significance of the correlation was assessed using a two-tailed t-test for the correlation coefficient. The utilization of such rigorous statistical methods ensured that our findings were not simply based on random chance, steering clear of any "milked" interpretations.

A set of sensitivity analyses was also performed to examine the robustness of the findings, akin to double-checking the expiration date on a carton of milk. This involved exploring various sub-samples, time periods, and regional variations within Pennsylvania to confirm the consistency of the correlation across different contexts.

In summary, the methodology employed in this study adhered to the highest standards of data collection, cleaning, and analysis, setting a new standard in the investigation of dairy-related factors in criminal behavior. Our approach was rigorous, meticulous, and unapologetically cheesy, reflecting the seriousness with which we sought to address this curious correlation between milk consumption and robbery rates.

So let's "moo-ve" forward to examine the findings of this study, but don't "whey-ste" your attention just yet – there's still "udderly" fascinating analysis to come!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Robberies in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1990 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9635588, r-squared of 0.9284456, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Dairy Dilemma: Milk Consumption and Robbery Rates in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
This udderly intriguing study delves into the surprising relationship between milk consumption and robbery rates in the state of Pennsylvania. The research team utilized data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to investigate this curious correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9635588 and p < 0.01 spanning the years 1990 to 2021, our findings are nothing to cry over spilt milk.

The results of our study reveal a statistically significant positive association between the per capita milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania. This unexpected link raises the question: "Got milk, got crimes?" Our analysis suggests that an increase in milk consumption is indeed associated with a rise in robbery incidents, a phenomena that may be coined, "The Milk Bandit Effect."

At the risk of sounding cheesy, our research suggests that the relationship between milk consumption and crime rates may be more than a mere dairy coincidence. The implications of these findings are not just a case of "whole" or "skim" evidence, but rather a reminder to approach data analysis with a discerning eye.

In conclusion, this study sheds light on an illuminating connection between milk consumption and robberies in Pennsylvania and provides food for thought in understanding societal influences on criminal behavior. It leaves us pondering: "Do criminals really cry over spilt milk, or do they just make a quick getaway?"

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between dietary habits and societal trends has long been an area of interest and speculation. In recent years, studies have increasingly examined the potential association between food consumption and crime rates, seeking to unravel the mysteries of human behavior. Building upon this line of inquiry, the present research explores the intriguing link between milk consumption and robbery rates in the state of Pennsylvania.
Whipping up a delicious blend of statistical analysis and dairy humor, this study aims to elucidate whether there is a legitimate correlation between milk intake and criminal activity. We aim to milk this topic for all its worth, carefully curdling through the data to determine if there is indeed a direct cheese-to-crime connection.
Are you ready for a pun-laden journey into the world of correlation and criminal conduct? Well, grab a glass of milk and let's dive into the compelling findings that emerged from our rigorous analysis. It's time to separate the whey from the curds and dispel the myths surrounding this thought-provoking relationship.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania yielded noteworthy results. Our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between per capita milk consumption and robbery incidents, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9635588 and an r-squared of 0.9284456 for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This correlation was found to be statistically significant at the p < 0.01 level, indicating a robust relationship between these variables.

Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between milk consumption and robbery rates. The data points show a clear pattern, resembling a trail of spilled milk leading to an uptick in criminal activity. This visual representation confirms the robustness of the positive association observed in our analysis.

Now, did you hear about the kidnapping at the dairy farm? The cows were all taken for "moo-lk" ransom! Speaking of dairy and crime, our research suggests that while one might cry over spilt milk, it appears that increased milk consumption is associated with an increase in robbery rates. It seems that in Pennsylvania, moo-tivated criminals may indeed be turning to milk for more than just their morning cereal.

Our statistical model not only indicates a strong correlation but also provides evidence of a causal relationship, suggesting that the more milk is consumed, the higher the robbery rates tend to be. This finding may have far-reaching implications for understanding the societal factors influencing criminal behavior and could lead to a reevaluation of the commonly accepted wisdom about the impact of dietary choices on criminal activity.

In summary, our study has "milked" the statistical data to reveal a compelling association between milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania. This unexpected relationship opens the door to further research into the potential mechanisms underlying this correlation and highlights the importance of considering dietary influences on societal behavior. As we ruminate on these findings, it might just be time to rethink the notion that "milk does a body good" in every context!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Robberies in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Dairy Dilemma: Milk Consumption and Robbery Rates in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
This udderly intriguing study delves into the surprising relationship between milk consumption and robbery rates in the state of Pennsylvania. The research team utilized data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to investigate this curious correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9635588 and p < 0.01 spanning the years 1990 to 2021, our findings are nothing to cry over spilt milk.

The results of our study reveal a statistically significant positive association between the per capita milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania. This unexpected link raises the question: "Got milk, got crimes?" Our analysis suggests that an increase in milk consumption is indeed associated with a rise in robbery incidents, a phenomena that may be coined, "The Milk Bandit Effect."

At the risk of sounding cheesy, our research suggests that the relationship between milk consumption and crime rates may be more than a mere dairy coincidence. The implications of these findings are not just a case of "whole" or "skim" evidence, but rather a reminder to approach data analysis with a discerning eye.

In conclusion, this study sheds light on an illuminating connection between milk consumption and robberies in Pennsylvania and provides food for thought in understanding societal influences on criminal behavior. It leaves us pondering: "Do criminals really cry over spilt milk, or do they just make a quick getaway?"

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The existing literature on the relationship between dietary habits and societal behavior provides a valuable foundation for investigating the intriguing link between milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania. Smith et al. (2015) found a positive correlation between dairy intake and criminal activity in urban populations, laying the groundwork for further exploration in this area. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) suggested a potential link between calcium-rich foods and aggressive behavior, hinting at a potential dairy dilemma that merits deeper investigation.
In "Milk and Misdeeds: Exploring the Dairy-Crime Connection," the authors delve into the historical patterns of milk consumption and criminal activity, unearthing surprising parallels that challenge conventional wisdom. Their analysis suggests that lactose-induced aggressions may be worth further scrutiny, and perhaps even a curfew on dairy products in certain regions. It's clear that the calcium content in milk may not be the only thing "getting into people's bones."
Drawing inspiration from non-fiction works, "Milk: The White Scandal" and "Got Milked? The Cows Strike Back," shed light on the dark underbelly of the dairy industry and its potential impact on societal behavior. These books highlight the complexities of milk consumption and its implications for human conduct, raising pertinent questions about the role of lactose in the proverbial "cereal" killer.
Turning to fictional narratives, "The Milkman Murders" and "Dairy of a Madman" offer a whimsical yet thought-provoking exploration of the dairy-crime connection in their respective plots. While fictional in nature, these narratives offer imaginative interpretations of the potential repercussions of excessive lactose consumption, adding a dash of intrigue to the scholarly discourse.
In addition, notable TV shows such as "Milk Mysteries" and "Criminal Dairy Investigations" provide a unique perspective on the intersection of dairy products and criminal activity, offering dramatized narratives that captivate audiences while raising provocative questions about the potential influence of milk on law enforcement dynamics. These shows offer an entertaining yet insightful glimpse into the intersection of milk and mayhem, further fueling our curiosity about the dairy-crime correlation.


[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania yielded noteworthy results. Our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between per capita milk consumption and robbery incidents, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9635588 and an r-squared of 0.9284456 for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This correlation was found to be statistically significant at the p < 0.01 level, indicating a robust relationship between these variables.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between milk consumption and robbery rates. The data points show a clear pattern, resembling a trail of spilled milk leading to an uptick in criminal activity. This visual representation confirms the robustness of the positive association observed in our analysis.
Now, did you hear about the kidnapping at the dairy farm? The cows were all taken for "moo-lk" ransom! Speaking of dairy and crime, our research suggests that while one might cry over spilt milk, it appears that increased milk consumption is associated with an increase in robbery rates. It seems that in Pennsylvania, moo-tivated criminals may indeed be turning to milk for more than just their morning cereal.
Our statistical model not only indicates a strong correlation but also provides evidence of a causal relationship, suggesting that the more milk is consumed, the higher the robbery rates tend to be. This finding may have far-reaching implications for understanding the societal factors influencing criminal behavior and could lead to a reevaluation of the commonly accepted wisdom about the impact of dietary choices on criminal activity.
In summary, our study has "milked" the statistical data to reveal a compelling association between milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania. This unexpected relationship opens the door to further research into the potential mechanisms underlying this correlation and highlights the importance of considering dietary influences on societal behavior. As we ruminate on these findings, it might just be time to rethink the notion that "milk does a body good" in every context!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study offer compelling evidence of a significant positive association between milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania. The correlation coefficient of 0.9635588 and the p-value of less than 0.01 for the period from 1990 to 2021 highlight the robustness of this relationship. These results support prior research by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), who hinted at a potential connection between dairy intake and criminal activity. It appears that the phrase "Got milk, got crimes?" may hold more weight than previously believed, and our study serves as a serious attempt to "skim" through the potential influences of milk consumption on criminal behavior.

The strong positive correlation we observed aligns with previous studies that have explored the impact of dietary habits on societal conduct. While the notion of lactose-induced aggression may have initially sounded like a "moo-t" point, our results support the growing body of evidence suggesting that dietary choices, including milk consumption, can indeed play a role in shaping criminal behavior. This makes one wonder whether criminals have a penchant for dairy products not just for the calcium content but also for the potential to "milk" the situation for their benefit.

Our findings go beyond mere statistical associations and suggest a potential causal relationship between milk consumption and robbery rates. The observed increase in robbery incidents corresponding to higher levels of milk consumption raises intriguing questions about the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. It seems that in Pennsylvania, the allure of milk may extend beyond the breakfast table and into the realm of criminal activity, prompting us to consider the potential impact of this seemingly innocuous beverage on law enforcement dynamics.

As we "whey" the implications of our findings, it becomes evident that the dairy-crime correlation is not just a matter of "whole" or "skim" evidence but rather a complex interplay of societal, nutritional, and behavioral factors. This correlation "mooves" us beyond traditional understandings of crime determinants and emphasizes the need for a nuanced approach to examining the multifaceted influences on criminal behavior.

In conclusion, our study contributes to the literature by providing rigorous evidence of the curious association between milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania. The unexpected nature of this relationships should encourage further research into the potential mechanisms at play, which could ultimately lead to a better understanding of the broader societal implications of dietary choices. It seems that in the realm of criminal behavior, the question "Got milk?" may indeed prompt a closer inspection of the contents.

Now, did you hear about the dairy farmer who got acquitted of all charges? The jury found that the evidence was just too "cheesy" to be "milked."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Milk consumption and Robberies in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Dairy Dilemma: Milk Consumption and Robbery Rates in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
This udderly intriguing study delves into the surprising relationship between milk consumption and robbery rates in the state of Pennsylvania. The research team utilized data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to investigate this curious correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9635588 and p < 0.01 spanning the years 1990 to 2021, our findings are nothing to cry over spilt milk.

The results of our study reveal a statistically significant positive association between the per capita milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania. This unexpected link raises the question: "Got milk, got crimes?" Our analysis suggests that an increase in milk consumption is indeed associated with a rise in robbery incidents, a phenomena that may be coined, "The Milk Bandit Effect."

At the risk of sounding cheesy, our research suggests that the relationship between milk consumption and crime rates may be more than a mere dairy coincidence. The implications of these findings are not just a case of "whole" or "skim" evidence, but rather a reminder to approach data analysis with a discerning eye.

In conclusion, this study sheds light on an illuminating connection between milk consumption and robberies in Pennsylvania and provides food for thought in understanding societal influences on criminal behavior. It leaves us pondering: "Do criminals really cry over spilt milk, or do they just make a quick getaway?"

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between dietary habits and societal trends has long been an area of interest and speculation. In recent years, studies have increasingly examined the potential association between food consumption and crime rates, seeking to unravel the mysteries of human behavior. Building upon this line of inquiry, the present research explores the intriguing link between milk consumption and robbery rates in the state of Pennsylvania.
Whipping up a delicious blend of statistical analysis and dairy humor, this study aims to elucidate whether there is a legitimate correlation between milk intake and criminal activity. We aim to milk this topic for all its worth, carefully curdling through the data to determine if there is indeed a direct cheese-to-crime connection.
Are you ready for a pun-laden journey into the world of correlation and criminal conduct? Well, grab a glass of milk and let's dive into the compelling findings that emerged from our rigorous analysis. It's time to separate the whey from the curds and dispel the myths surrounding this thought-provoking relationship.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania yielded noteworthy results. Our findings revealed a strong positive correlation between per capita milk consumption and robbery incidents, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9635588 and an r-squared of 0.9284456 for the time period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This correlation was found to be statistically significant at the p < 0.01 level, indicating a robust relationship between these variables.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between milk consumption and robbery rates. The data points show a clear pattern, resembling a trail of spilled milk leading to an uptick in criminal activity. This visual representation confirms the robustness of the positive association observed in our analysis.
Now, did you hear about the kidnapping at the dairy farm? The cows were all taken for "moo-lk" ransom! Speaking of dairy and crime, our research suggests that while one might cry over spilt milk, it appears that increased milk consumption is associated with an increase in robbery rates. It seems that in Pennsylvania, moo-tivated criminals may indeed be turning to milk for more than just their morning cereal.
Our statistical model not only indicates a strong correlation but also provides evidence of a causal relationship, suggesting that the more milk is consumed, the higher the robbery rates tend to be. This finding may have far-reaching implications for understanding the societal factors influencing criminal behavior and could lead to a reevaluation of the commonly accepted wisdom about the impact of dietary choices on criminal activity.
In summary, our study has "milked" the statistical data to reveal a compelling association between milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania. This unexpected relationship opens the door to further research into the potential mechanisms underlying this correlation and highlights the importance of considering dietary influences on societal behavior. As we ruminate on these findings, it might just be time to rethink the notion that "milk does a body good" in every context!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has churned out some thought-provoking findings regarding the unexpected relationship between milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania. The statistically significant positive correlation between these variables suggests that perhaps "cereal" criminals are finding a new source of motivation in the dairy aisle. One can't help but wonder if lactose intolerance may be a small price to pay for decreased criminal temptation.

Our findings have uncovered what may be considered the "Milk Bandit Effect," with the statistical data pouring over us like an unexpected milk shower. As we consider the implications of this correlation, it's clear that the oft-quoted saying, "Don't cry over spilt milk," may need a criminal context, urging perpetrators to refrain from leaving behind a milky trail of evidence.

This study provides a fascinating insight into the potential influence of dietary habits on criminal behavior, perhaps prompting policymakers to reconsider the allocation of resources from crime prevention to lactose-intolerance prevention. After all, it seems that in Pennsylvania, the choice between 2% and skim may be a more crucial decision than previously thought.

As we mull over these findings, it's crucial to take them with a grain of salt—or perhaps a sprinkle of Parmesan. The age-old question, "Got milk, got crimes?" has moved from a whimsical inquiry to a statistical reality that demands further exploration and scrutiny. But, of course, it behooves us to remember not to cry over the myriad milk-related puns that have inevitably flooded the discussion.

Upon these findings, one thing is necessarily clear: no more research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Dairy Dilemma: Milk Consumption and Robbery Rates in Pennsylvania. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agrarian Economics and Criminal Justice


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Dairy Dilemma: Milk Consumption and Robbery Rates in Pennsylvania. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for the Advancement of Bovine Behavioral Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Dairy Dilemma: Milk Consumption and Robbery Rates in Pennsylvania with an abstract of This udderly intriguing study delves into the surprising relationship between milk consumption and robbery rates in the state of Pennsylvania. The research team utilized data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to investigate this curious correlation. With a correlation coefficient of 0.9635588 and p < 0.01 spanning the years 1990 to 2021, our findings are nothing to cry over spilt milk.
The results of our study reveal a statistically significant positive association between the per capita milk consumption and robbery rates in Pennsylvania. This unexpected link raises the question: "Got milk, got crimes?" Our analysis suggests that an increase in milk consumption is indeed associated with a rise in robbery incidents, a phenomena that may be coined, "The Milk Bandit Effect."
At the risk of sounding cheesy, our research suggests that the relationship between milk consumption and crime rates may be more than a mere dairy coincidence. The implications of these findings are not just a case of "whole" or "skim" evidence, but rather a reminder to approach data analysis with a discerning eye.
In conclusion, this study sheds light on an illuminating connection between milk consumption and robberies in Pennsylvania and provides food for thought in understanding societal influences on criminal behavior. It leaves us pondering: "Do criminals really cry over spilt milk, or do they just make a quick getaway?

ChatGPT:

milk consumption, robbery rates, Pennsylvania, USDA data, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, per capita milk consumption, crime rates, "The Milk Bandit Effect", dairy coincidence, data analysis, societal influences, criminal behavior

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Milk consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Fluid beverage milk in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Milk consumption

Robberies in Pennsylvania
Detailed data title: The robbery rate per 100,000 residents in Pennsylvania
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Robberies in Pennsylvania

Correlation r = 0.9635588 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9284456 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Robberies in Pennsylvania) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Milk consumption) over the 32 years from 1990 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.9E-19. 0.0000000000000000009871625377
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 9.9E-17% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,013,004,405,870,091,264 random variables You don't actually need 1 quintillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 31 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 31 because we have two variables measured over a period of 32 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.93, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Milk consumption (Pounds per person)220218215210208205205201198197196192191188185185185183181181177173169164158155153149145141141134
Robberies in Pennsylvania (Robbery rate)176.2193.9180.7179186.7189.3189156.3164.9155.7147.8142.2139.2145.3149.1154.9169.6156.4151.6138.9128.8126.8123.3115.3105.9101.496.392.17776.283.963.1




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([220,218,215,210,208,205,205,201,198,197,196,192,191,188,185,185,185,183,181,181,177,173,169,164,158,155,153,149,145,141,141,134,])
array_2 = np.array([176.2,193.9,180.7,179,186.7,189.3,189,156.3,164.9,155.7,147.8,142.2,139.2,145.3,149.1,154.9,169.6,156.4,151.6,138.9,128.8,126.8,123.3,115.3,105.9,101.4,96.3,92.1,77,76.2,83.9,63.1,])
array_1_name = "Milk consumption"
array_2_name = "Robberies in Pennsylvania"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 1644 · Black Variable ID: 554 · Red Variable ID: 20213
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0