Download png, svg
AI explanation
As more babies were named Ivory, it led to a spike in pastel-colored baby outfits. This, in turn, caused a rise in demand for blue and red dyes. With the sudden need for more dyes, the prices shot up, making it more lucrative for farmers in Texas to switch from cattle ranching to growing dye plants. As a result, there was a shortage of cattle, leading to higher beef prices. The Texas Rangers, fueled by the most expensive beef in the league, were able to power their way to a higher division finish, proving once and for all that there's no steak-like motivation!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] Show a vibrant and energetic city street scene in Texas, with a diverse crowd gathered around a proud couple announcing the name "Ivory" for their newborn baby amidst a lively street fair. The newborn is swaddled in a blanket, held high by the beaming parents, with onlookers smiling and applauding. In the background, the Texas Rangers baseball team celebrates their first-place finish in the American League West Division, with players and fans cheering and waving flags. Capture the sense of joy and excitement pulsating through the entire bustling city. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Ivory and Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic Psychedelic A photo-realistic image Psychedelic Symbolism
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Ivory and Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Texas city, a crowd gathers around the popular new baby name "Ivory," as proud parents announce it during a lively street fair. In the background, a group of enthusiastic fans cheer on the Texas Rangers as they celebrate their first-place finish in the American League West Division, bringing smiles and excitement to the whole community.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Texas city, a crowd gathers around the popular new baby name "Ivory," as proud parents announce it during a lively street fair. In the background, a group of enthusiastic fans cheer on the Texas Rangers as they celebrate their first-place finish in the American League West Division, bringing smiles and excitement to the whole community. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] Show a vibrant and energetic city street scene in Texas, with a diverse crowd gathered around a proud couple announcing the name "Ivory" for their newborn baby amidst a lively street fair. The newborn is swaddled in a blanket, held high by the beaming parents, with onlookers smiling and applauding. In the background, the Texas Rangers baseball team celebrates their first-place finish in the American League West Division, with players and fans cheering and waving flags. Capture the sense of joy and excitement pulsating through the entire bustling city.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Ivory caused Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position to increase.
AI academic paper
The Ivory Connection: A Study on the Interplay between the Popularity of the Name Ivory and the Texas Rangers' Performance in the American League West Division The Journal of Sports Anthropology and Name-Based Performance Studies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ivory and Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title a clever pun.
Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Baseball Reference to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8382802 and p < 0.01 for 1976 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Ivory Connection: A Study on the Interplay between the Popularity of the Name Ivory and the Texas Rangers' Performance in the American League West Division"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious relationship between the prevalence of the moniker "Ivory" and the standings of the Texas Rangers in the competitive landscape of the American League West Division. By delving into data from the US Social Security Administration and Baseball Reference spanning the years 1976 to 2022, our research team uncovered an unexpected correlation between the frequency of the name "Ivory" and the performance of the Texas Rangers. The correlation coefficient of 0.8382802 and p < 0.01 denotes a robust statistical connection, implying that there may be more to a name than meets the eye, especially when it comes to the triumphs and tribulations of a baseball team. This investigation offers a unique blend of sociolinguistics and sports analytics, unraveling a comical yet thought-provoking coalescence of nomenclature and athletic prowess. It is our hope that this study sparks further discussion and prompts a closer examination of the whimsical interplay between personal nomenclature and team performance, shedding light on the quirky dynamics that underpin our beloved pastimes.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ivory and Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Ivory Connection: A Study on the Interplay between the Popularity of the Name Ivory and the Texas Rangers' Performance in the American League West Division"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious relationship between the prevalence of the moniker "Ivory" and the standings of the Texas Rangers in the competitive landscape of the American League West Division. By delving into data from the US Social Security Administration and Baseball Reference spanning the years 1976 to 2022, our research team uncovered an unexpected correlation between the frequency of the name "Ivory" and the performance of the Texas Rangers. The correlation coefficient of 0.8382802 and p < 0.01 denotes a robust statistical connection, implying that there may be more to a name than meets the eye, especially when it comes to the triumphs and tribulations of a baseball team. This investigation offers a unique blend of sociolinguistics and sports analytics, unraveling a comical yet thought-provoking coalescence of nomenclature and athletic prowess. It is our hope that this study sparks further discussion and prompts a closer examination of the whimsical interplay between personal nomenclature and team performance, shedding light on the quirky dynamics that underpin our beloved pastimes.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of statistical analysis and the idiosyncrasies of the human condition has long been a source of fascination for researchers across diverse disciplines. From the infamous "Dr. Seuss Effect" on childhood literacy to the impact of Harry Potter on the popularity of owls as household pets, the curious connections between names and cultural phenomena have never failed to pique academic interest. In this vein, the present study examines the correlation between the prevalence of the name "Ivory" and the performance of the Texas Rangers in the tumultuous domain of the American League West Division.
As with any endeavor of scholarly inquiry, it is essential to ground our exploration in established literature and theory. Previous studies have delved into the influence of names on various aspects of life, ranging from professional success to romantic pursuits. However, the mosaic of statistical analysis and baseball standings presents a novel and lighthearted terrain for investigation. Never before has such an inquiry probed the intersection of personal nomenclature and team dynamics, encapsulating the whimsical essence of sports culture and societal nomenclature.
The enigmatic allure of the Texas Rangers' journey through the American League West Division, intertwined with the ebb and flow of the name "Ivory," sets the stage for a whimsical and compelling adventure into the world of sports linguistics. While skeptics may scoff at the idea of a name wielding tangible influence over the triumphs and travails of a baseball team, the robust statistical foundation underpinning this work substantiates the possibility of an unconventional linkage that transcends mere happenstance.
With this paper, we embark on a journey that acknowledges the potential for perceptible yet unconventional threads between the realm of nomenclature and the fervent fervor of baseball. As we elucidate our findings, we invite readers to join us in exploring the unexpected confluence of personal monikers and athletic saga, unfolding a narrative that pays homage to the delightful caprice of human experience.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ivory and Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Ivory Connection: A Study on the Interplay between the Popularity of the Name Ivory and the Texas Rangers' Performance in the American League West Division"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious relationship between the prevalence of the moniker "Ivory" and the standings of the Texas Rangers in the competitive landscape of the American League West Division. By delving into data from the US Social Security Administration and Baseball Reference spanning the years 1976 to 2022, our research team uncovered an unexpected correlation between the frequency of the name "Ivory" and the performance of the Texas Rangers. The correlation coefficient of 0.8382802 and p < 0.01 denotes a robust statistical connection, implying that there may be more to a name than meets the eye, especially when it comes to the triumphs and tribulations of a baseball team. This investigation offers a unique blend of sociolinguistics and sports analytics, unraveling a comical yet thought-provoking coalescence of nomenclature and athletic prowess. It is our hope that this study sparks further discussion and prompts a closer examination of the whimsical interplay between personal nomenclature and team performance, shedding light on the quirky dynamics that underpin our beloved pastimes.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of statistical analysis and the idiosyncrasies of the human condition has long been a source of fascination for researchers across diverse disciplines. From the infamous "Dr. Seuss Effect" on childhood literacy to the impact of Harry Potter on the popularity of owls as household pets, the curious connections between names and cultural phenomena have never failed to pique academic interest. In this vein, the present study examines the correlation between the prevalence of the name "Ivory" and the performance of the Texas Rangers in the tumultuous domain of the American League West Division.
As with any endeavor of scholarly inquiry, it is essential to ground our exploration in established literature and theory. Previous studies have delved into the influence of names on various aspects of life, ranging from professional success to romantic pursuits. However, the mosaic of statistical analysis and baseball standings presents a novel and lighthearted terrain for investigation. Never before has such an inquiry probed the intersection of personal nomenclature and team dynamics, encapsulating the whimsical essence of sports culture and societal nomenclature.
The enigmatic allure of the Texas Rangers' journey through the American League West Division, intertwined with the ebb and flow of the name "Ivory," sets the stage for a whimsical and compelling adventure into the world of sports linguistics. While skeptics may scoff at the idea of a name wielding tangible influence over the triumphs and travails of a baseball team, the robust statistical foundation underpinning this work substantiates the possibility of an unconventional linkage that transcends mere happenstance.
With this paper, we embark on a journey that acknowledges the potential for perceptible yet unconventional threads between the realm of nomenclature and the fervent fervor of baseball. As we elucidate our findings, we invite readers to join us in exploring the unexpected confluence of personal monikers and athletic saga, unfolding a narrative that pays homage to the delightful caprice of human experience.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2005) examine the impact of personal names on professional trajectory and conclude that there may indeed be subtle implications of nomenclature that extend beyond mere denotation. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2010) delve into the psychological dimensions of names, postulating that individuals may internalize societal perceptions associated with their names, which could, in turn, influence their behavior and outcomes.
Expanding the purview beyond the realm of sociolinguistics, the literature on sports performance and team dynamics provides invaluable insights into the intricate interplay of factors that shape athletic success. Stalwart studies by Adams (2013) and Brown (2017) have elucidated the multifaceted nature of team morale, strategy, and athleticism. Furthermore, analyses of fan demographics by Miller (2019) and Campbell (2021) have shed light on the fervent emotions and communal identity forged within sports culture.
Transitioning to the domain of popular literature, non-fiction works such as "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner (2005) and "Blink" by Gladwell (2007) offer intriguing perspectives on societal anomalies and patterns, weaving narratives that encompass the whimsical quirks of human behavior and decision-making. On a tangentially related note, the fictional realm presents narratives that, while not explicitly centered on sports and nomenclature, offer tantalizing glimpses into the capricious interplay of fate and nomenclature. Works such as "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Night Circus" by Erin Morgenstern beckon readers into enchanting worlds where the very essence of a name holds palpable power and enigmatic allure.
Venturing further into unconventional avenues of inquiry, the authors grapple with the intricacies of data acquisition and embark on an unorthodox review of ephemeral snippets from commonplace artifacts. Appealing to the idiosyncratic ethos of research, the authors draw from an amalgamation of sources, including but not limited to, the eclectic tapestries of tales inscribed on library book spines, the whimsical timbre of bedtime stories whispered by generations past, and the cryptic musings embedded within the sprawling enigma of CVS receipts. The latter, in particular, offers an unexpected trove of inscriptions, intertwining mundane transactions with enigmatic codes and unruly coupon jargon – a veritable mosaic of contemporary lore.
As the researchers traverse the landscape of literature, from the hallowed halls of academia to the fantastical realms of fiction, they embrace the droll and the unexpected, acknowledging that within the seemingly mundane and unassuming lies the potential for scholarly illumination. This mosaic of exploration sets the stage for a robust investigation that celebrates the whimsical, the absurd, and the unforeseen, propelling the study of the "Ivory Connection" into a realm replete with scholarly mirth and boundless revelation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ivory and Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Baseball Reference . You used data from 1976 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Ivory Connection: A Study on the Interplay between the Popularity of the Name Ivory and the Texas Rangers' Performance in the American League West Division"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious relationship between the prevalence of the moniker "Ivory" and the standings of the Texas Rangers in the competitive landscape of the American League West Division. By delving into data from the US Social Security Administration and Baseball Reference spanning the years 1976 to 2022, our research team uncovered an unexpected correlation between the frequency of the name "Ivory" and the performance of the Texas Rangers. The correlation coefficient of 0.8382802 and p < 0.01 denotes a robust statistical connection, implying that there may be more to a name than meets the eye, especially when it comes to the triumphs and tribulations of a baseball team. This investigation offers a unique blend of sociolinguistics and sports analytics, unraveling a comical yet thought-provoking coalescence of nomenclature and athletic prowess. It is our hope that this study sparks further discussion and prompts a closer examination of the whimsical interplay between personal nomenclature and team performance, shedding light on the quirky dynamics that underpin our beloved pastimes.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of statistical analysis and the idiosyncrasies of the human condition has long been a source of fascination for researchers across diverse disciplines. From the infamous "Dr. Seuss Effect" on childhood literacy to the impact of Harry Potter on the popularity of owls as household pets, the curious connections between names and cultural phenomena have never failed to pique academic interest. In this vein, the present study examines the correlation between the prevalence of the name "Ivory" and the performance of the Texas Rangers in the tumultuous domain of the American League West Division.
As with any endeavor of scholarly inquiry, it is essential to ground our exploration in established literature and theory. Previous studies have delved into the influence of names on various aspects of life, ranging from professional success to romantic pursuits. However, the mosaic of statistical analysis and baseball standings presents a novel and lighthearted terrain for investigation. Never before has such an inquiry probed the intersection of personal nomenclature and team dynamics, encapsulating the whimsical essence of sports culture and societal nomenclature.
The enigmatic allure of the Texas Rangers' journey through the American League West Division, intertwined with the ebb and flow of the name "Ivory," sets the stage for a whimsical and compelling adventure into the world of sports linguistics. While skeptics may scoff at the idea of a name wielding tangible influence over the triumphs and travails of a baseball team, the robust statistical foundation underpinning this work substantiates the possibility of an unconventional linkage that transcends mere happenstance.
With this paper, we embark on a journey that acknowledges the potential for perceptible yet unconventional threads between the realm of nomenclature and the fervent fervor of baseball. As we elucidate our findings, we invite readers to join us in exploring the unexpected confluence of personal monikers and athletic saga, unfolding a narrative that pays homage to the delightful caprice of human experience.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The assembly of data for this study involved a meticulous fusion of sociolinguistic scrutiny and baseball analytics, encompassing a period spanning from 1976 to 2022. Our first step was to harness the resources of the US Social Security Administration, summoning forth the moniker "Ivory" from the depths of historical birth records. With fervent dedication, we sought to trace the undulating waves of Ivory's prominence across time, capturing the ebbs and flows of a name distinctly poised to make its mark in the annals of nomenclature.
Next, to gauge the Texas Rangers' performance in the American League West Division, we ventured forth into the treasure trove that is Baseball Reference. We delved deep into the statistical compendium, immersing ourselves in the illustrious victories and humbling defeats that populate the rich tapestry of baseball history. With the precision of a seasoned archaeologist unearthing ancient relics, we unearthed the Rangers' league standings throughout the years, mindful of the capricious winds of fate that govern the ebb and flow of competitive sports.
The harmonious symphony of data gathered from these disparate yet harmonious sources culminated in a unified database that served as the compass for our odyssey into uncharted scholarly territory. With the synthesis of these unique datasets, we embarked on a journey of exploration, deftly navigating through the intricacies of statistical analysis and linguistic enigma in search of the elusive connection between the eponymous "Ivory" and the dramatic fortunes of the Texas Rangers.
Once the repository of data had been forged, we employed rigorous statistical methodologies to fathom the intricate dance between the name "Ivory" and the Texas Rangers' standing in the American League West Division. Utilizing time-series analysis, correlation coefficients, and rigorous regression modeling, we mapped the interplay of these peculiar variables, plumbing the depths of statistical significance to discern the presence of meaningful patterns and connections.
Amidst the fervor of this exploration, we also remained acutely aware of the potential for confounding variables, ensuring that our analytical lens remained razor-sharp in the face of confounding factors that could obfuscate the true nature of the Ivory-Rangers confluence. With scholarly precision and unyielding resolve, we endeavored to unravel the complex tapestry that entwines nomenclature and athletic prowess, embracing the peculiarity of our chosen inquiry with a twinkle in our eyes and a robustness in our methodology.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ivory and Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Baseball Reference .
For the time period 1976 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8382802, r-squared of 0.7027136, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Ivory Connection: A Study on the Interplay between the Popularity of the Name Ivory and the Texas Rangers' Performance in the American League West Division"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious relationship between the prevalence of the moniker "Ivory" and the standings of the Texas Rangers in the competitive landscape of the American League West Division. By delving into data from the US Social Security Administration and Baseball Reference spanning the years 1976 to 2022, our research team uncovered an unexpected correlation between the frequency of the name "Ivory" and the performance of the Texas Rangers. The correlation coefficient of 0.8382802 and p < 0.01 denotes a robust statistical connection, implying that there may be more to a name than meets the eye, especially when it comes to the triumphs and tribulations of a baseball team. This investigation offers a unique blend of sociolinguistics and sports analytics, unraveling a comical yet thought-provoking coalescence of nomenclature and athletic prowess. It is our hope that this study sparks further discussion and prompts a closer examination of the whimsical interplay between personal nomenclature and team performance, shedding light on the quirky dynamics that underpin our beloved pastimes.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of statistical analysis and the idiosyncrasies of the human condition has long been a source of fascination for researchers across diverse disciplines. From the infamous "Dr. Seuss Effect" on childhood literacy to the impact of Harry Potter on the popularity of owls as household pets, the curious connections between names and cultural phenomena have never failed to pique academic interest. In this vein, the present study examines the correlation between the prevalence of the name "Ivory" and the performance of the Texas Rangers in the tumultuous domain of the American League West Division.
As with any endeavor of scholarly inquiry, it is essential to ground our exploration in established literature and theory. Previous studies have delved into the influence of names on various aspects of life, ranging from professional success to romantic pursuits. However, the mosaic of statistical analysis and baseball standings presents a novel and lighthearted terrain for investigation. Never before has such an inquiry probed the intersection of personal nomenclature and team dynamics, encapsulating the whimsical essence of sports culture and societal nomenclature.
The enigmatic allure of the Texas Rangers' journey through the American League West Division, intertwined with the ebb and flow of the name "Ivory," sets the stage for a whimsical and compelling adventure into the world of sports linguistics. While skeptics may scoff at the idea of a name wielding tangible influence over the triumphs and travails of a baseball team, the robust statistical foundation underpinning this work substantiates the possibility of an unconventional linkage that transcends mere happenstance.
With this paper, we embark on a journey that acknowledges the potential for perceptible yet unconventional threads between the realm of nomenclature and the fervent fervor of baseball. As we elucidate our findings, we invite readers to join us in exploring the unexpected confluence of personal monikers and athletic saga, unfolding a narrative that pays homage to the delightful caprice of human experience.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data spanning the years 1976 to 2022 revealed a significant correlation between the frequency of the name "Ivory" and the performance of the Texas Rangers in the American League West Division. The correlation coefficient of 0.8382802 highlights a robust and unexpected statistical connection, making this study an intriguing blend of sociolinguistics and sports analytics. This correlation indicates that there may be more than mere coincidence at play in the realms of personal nomenclature and baseball prowess.
The r-squared value of 0.7027136 suggests that approximately 70% of the variation in the Texas Rangers' division finish position can be explained by the popularity of the name "Ivory." This finding further underscores the tangible influence that nomenclature may exert on the ebb and flow of a baseball team's performance, offering a novel perspective on the intricate interplay between personal names and athletic achievements. While skeptics may remain unconvinced, the statistical foundation of this correlation provides compelling evidence of an unexpected linkage that transcends mere happenstance.
The p-value of less than 0.01 adds another layer of support to our findings, indicating a high level of statistical significance. This underscores the robustness of the correlation between the prevalence of the name "Ivory" and the Texas Rangers' standing in the competitive landscape of the American League West Division. The data-driven confirmation of this connection sets the stage for a novel and whimsical exploration of the interplay between personal nomenclature and team dynamics, shedding light on the quirky dynamics that underpin our beloved pastimes.
To visually encapsulate the strength of the correlation, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) is presented, showcasing the unmistakable trend between the frequency of the name "Ivory" and the Texas Rangers' performance in the American League West Division. The scatterplot provides a clear illustration of the robust statistical connection uncovered in this study, highlighting the unexpected interplay between personal nomenclature and athletic achievements. The whimsical nature of this correlation adds a delightful caprice to the narrative of team dynamics and societal nomenclature, inviting further exploration and scholarly discourse on this curious intersection.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ivory and Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"The Ivory Connection: A Study on the Interplay between the Popularity of the Name Ivory and the Texas Rangers' Performance in the American League West Division"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious relationship between the prevalence of the moniker "Ivory" and the standings of the Texas Rangers in the competitive landscape of the American League West Division. By delving into data from the US Social Security Administration and Baseball Reference spanning the years 1976 to 2022, our research team uncovered an unexpected correlation between the frequency of the name "Ivory" and the performance of the Texas Rangers. The correlation coefficient of 0.8382802 and p < 0.01 denotes a robust statistical connection, implying that there may be more to a name than meets the eye, especially when it comes to the triumphs and tribulations of a baseball team. This investigation offers a unique blend of sociolinguistics and sports analytics, unraveling a comical yet thought-provoking coalescence of nomenclature and athletic prowess. It is our hope that this study sparks further discussion and prompts a closer examination of the whimsical interplay between personal nomenclature and team performance, shedding light on the quirky dynamics that underpin our beloved pastimes.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2005) examine the impact of personal names on professional trajectory and conclude that there may indeed be subtle implications of nomenclature that extend beyond mere denotation. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2010) delve into the psychological dimensions of names, postulating that individuals may internalize societal perceptions associated with their names, which could, in turn, influence their behavior and outcomes.
Expanding the purview beyond the realm of sociolinguistics, the literature on sports performance and team dynamics provides invaluable insights into the intricate interplay of factors that shape athletic success. Stalwart studies by Adams (2013) and Brown (2017) have elucidated the multifaceted nature of team morale, strategy, and athleticism. Furthermore, analyses of fan demographics by Miller (2019) and Campbell (2021) have shed light on the fervent emotions and communal identity forged within sports culture.
Transitioning to the domain of popular literature, non-fiction works such as "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner (2005) and "Blink" by Gladwell (2007) offer intriguing perspectives on societal anomalies and patterns, weaving narratives that encompass the whimsical quirks of human behavior and decision-making. On a tangentially related note, the fictional realm presents narratives that, while not explicitly centered on sports and nomenclature, offer tantalizing glimpses into the capricious interplay of fate and nomenclature. Works such as "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Night Circus" by Erin Morgenstern beckon readers into enchanting worlds where the very essence of a name holds palpable power and enigmatic allure.
Venturing further into unconventional avenues of inquiry, the authors grapple with the intricacies of data acquisition and embark on an unorthodox review of ephemeral snippets from commonplace artifacts. Appealing to the idiosyncratic ethos of research, the authors draw from an amalgamation of sources, including but not limited to, the eclectic tapestries of tales inscribed on library book spines, the whimsical timbre of bedtime stories whispered by generations past, and the cryptic musings embedded within the sprawling enigma of CVS receipts. The latter, in particular, offers an unexpected trove of inscriptions, intertwining mundane transactions with enigmatic codes and unruly coupon jargon – a veritable mosaic of contemporary lore.
As the researchers traverse the landscape of literature, from the hallowed halls of academia to the fantastical realms of fiction, they embrace the droll and the unexpected, acknowledging that within the seemingly mundane and unassuming lies the potential for scholarly illumination. This mosaic of exploration sets the stage for a robust investigation that celebrates the whimsical, the absurd, and the unforeseen, propelling the study of the "Ivory Connection" into a realm replete with scholarly mirth and boundless revelation.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data spanning the years 1976 to 2022 revealed a significant correlation between the frequency of the name "Ivory" and the performance of the Texas Rangers in the American League West Division. The correlation coefficient of 0.8382802 highlights a robust and unexpected statistical connection, making this study an intriguing blend of sociolinguistics and sports analytics. This correlation indicates that there may be more than mere coincidence at play in the realms of personal nomenclature and baseball prowess.
The r-squared value of 0.7027136 suggests that approximately 70% of the variation in the Texas Rangers' division finish position can be explained by the popularity of the name "Ivory." This finding further underscores the tangible influence that nomenclature may exert on the ebb and flow of a baseball team's performance, offering a novel perspective on the intricate interplay between personal names and athletic achievements. While skeptics may remain unconvinced, the statistical foundation of this correlation provides compelling evidence of an unexpected linkage that transcends mere happenstance.
The p-value of less than 0.01 adds another layer of support to our findings, indicating a high level of statistical significance. This underscores the robustness of the correlation between the prevalence of the name "Ivory" and the Texas Rangers' standing in the competitive landscape of the American League West Division. The data-driven confirmation of this connection sets the stage for a novel and whimsical exploration of the interplay between personal nomenclature and team dynamics, shedding light on the quirky dynamics that underpin our beloved pastimes.
To visually encapsulate the strength of the correlation, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) is presented, showcasing the unmistakable trend between the frequency of the name "Ivory" and the Texas Rangers' performance in the American League West Division. The scatterplot provides a clear illustration of the robust statistical connection uncovered in this study, highlighting the unexpected interplay between personal nomenclature and athletic achievements. The whimsical nature of this correlation adds a delightful caprice to the narrative of team dynamics and societal nomenclature, inviting further exploration and scholarly discourse on this curious intersection.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of this study provide compelling evidence that there may indeed be a substantive connection between the prevalence of the name "Ivory" and the performance of the Texas Rangers in the American League West Division. Our results not only support prior research on the potential psychological implications of nomenclature but also point to a whimsical yet significant interplay between personal names and athletic prowess.
Drawing from the work of Smith and Doe (2005), which hinted at the subtle impact of names on professional trajectories, and the psychological dimensions of names explored by Jones et al. (2010), our investigation offers empirical support and extends these theoretical underpinnings into the realm of sports analytics. The robust statistical correlation coefficient and the r-squared value of 0.7027136 lend credence to the notion that the frequency of the name "Ivory" may indeed exert a palpable influence on the Texas Rangers' standings within their division. It is truly a testament to the potential ramifications of seemingly innocuous nomenclature.
Furthermore, the statistical significance indicated by a p-value of less than 0.01 echoes the substantial nature of this unexpected linkage. While we acknowledge the novelty and lightheartedness of this line of inquiry, the robustness of the statistical foundation cannot be overlooked. It is a prime example of how scholarly pursuits, even those tinged with humor and whimsy, can uncover unexpected revelations.
Our results also resonate with the unorthodox avenues of inquiry encompassed within our literature review. While we may have playfully acknowledged the droll and the unexpected, it is clear that our findings present a serious and intriguing perspective on the unique interplay between personal nomenclature and team dynamics. This mosaic of exploration, from the esoteric realms of fiction to the pragmatic world of sports analytics, has indeed set the stage for a spirited investigation that celebrates the whimsical and the unforeseen.
In conclusion, our study sheds light on the quirky dynamics that underpin our beloved pastimes, providing a refreshing lens through which to view the idiosyncrasies of societal dynamics. The unexpected marriage of sociolinguistics and sports analytics offers a unique blend of scholarly mirth and boundless revelation, inviting further discourse and exploration of the enchanting "Ivory Connection."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Ivory and Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Ivory Connection: A Study on the Interplay between the Popularity of the Name Ivory and the Texas Rangers' Performance in the American League West Division"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the curious relationship between the prevalence of the moniker "Ivory" and the standings of the Texas Rangers in the competitive landscape of the American League West Division. By delving into data from the US Social Security Administration and Baseball Reference spanning the years 1976 to 2022, our research team uncovered an unexpected correlation between the frequency of the name "Ivory" and the performance of the Texas Rangers. The correlation coefficient of 0.8382802 and p < 0.01 denotes a robust statistical connection, implying that there may be more to a name than meets the eye, especially when it comes to the triumphs and tribulations of a baseball team. This investigation offers a unique blend of sociolinguistics and sports analytics, unraveling a comical yet thought-provoking coalescence of nomenclature and athletic prowess. It is our hope that this study sparks further discussion and prompts a closer examination of the whimsical interplay between personal nomenclature and team performance, shedding light on the quirky dynamics that underpin our beloved pastimes.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of statistical analysis and the idiosyncrasies of the human condition has long been a source of fascination for researchers across diverse disciplines. From the infamous "Dr. Seuss Effect" on childhood literacy to the impact of Harry Potter on the popularity of owls as household pets, the curious connections between names and cultural phenomena have never failed to pique academic interest. In this vein, the present study examines the correlation between the prevalence of the name "Ivory" and the performance of the Texas Rangers in the tumultuous domain of the American League West Division.
As with any endeavor of scholarly inquiry, it is essential to ground our exploration in established literature and theory. Previous studies have delved into the influence of names on various aspects of life, ranging from professional success to romantic pursuits. However, the mosaic of statistical analysis and baseball standings presents a novel and lighthearted terrain for investigation. Never before has such an inquiry probed the intersection of personal nomenclature and team dynamics, encapsulating the whimsical essence of sports culture and societal nomenclature.
The enigmatic allure of the Texas Rangers' journey through the American League West Division, intertwined with the ebb and flow of the name "Ivory," sets the stage for a whimsical and compelling adventure into the world of sports linguistics. While skeptics may scoff at the idea of a name wielding tangible influence over the triumphs and travails of a baseball team, the robust statistical foundation underpinning this work substantiates the possibility of an unconventional linkage that transcends mere happenstance.
With this paper, we embark on a journey that acknowledges the potential for perceptible yet unconventional threads between the realm of nomenclature and the fervent fervor of baseball. As we elucidate our findings, we invite readers to join us in exploring the unexpected confluence of personal monikers and athletic saga, unfolding a narrative that pays homage to the delightful caprice of human experience.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of data spanning the years 1976 to 2022 revealed a significant correlation between the frequency of the name "Ivory" and the performance of the Texas Rangers in the American League West Division. The correlation coefficient of 0.8382802 highlights a robust and unexpected statistical connection, making this study an intriguing blend of sociolinguistics and sports analytics. This correlation indicates that there may be more than mere coincidence at play in the realms of personal nomenclature and baseball prowess.
The r-squared value of 0.7027136 suggests that approximately 70% of the variation in the Texas Rangers' division finish position can be explained by the popularity of the name "Ivory." This finding further underscores the tangible influence that nomenclature may exert on the ebb and flow of a baseball team's performance, offering a novel perspective on the intricate interplay between personal names and athletic achievements. While skeptics may remain unconvinced, the statistical foundation of this correlation provides compelling evidence of an unexpected linkage that transcends mere happenstance.
The p-value of less than 0.01 adds another layer of support to our findings, indicating a high level of statistical significance. This underscores the robustness of the correlation between the prevalence of the name "Ivory" and the Texas Rangers' standing in the competitive landscape of the American League West Division. The data-driven confirmation of this connection sets the stage for a novel and whimsical exploration of the interplay between personal nomenclature and team dynamics, shedding light on the quirky dynamics that underpin our beloved pastimes.
To visually encapsulate the strength of the correlation, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) is presented, showcasing the unmistakable trend between the frequency of the name "Ivory" and the Texas Rangers' performance in the American League West Division. The scatterplot provides a clear illustration of the robust statistical connection uncovered in this study, highlighting the unexpected interplay between personal nomenclature and athletic achievements. The whimsical nature of this correlation adds a delightful caprice to the narrative of team dynamics and societal nomenclature, inviting further exploration and scholarly discourse on this curious intersection.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has unveiled a fascinating correlation between the prevalence of the name "Ivory" and the performance of the Texas Rangers in the American League West Division. The robust statistical findings, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8382802 and a p-value of less than 0.01, underscore the unexpected influence that personal nomenclature may exert on the ebbs and flows of baseball prowess. These results inspire a lighthearted yet thought-provoking contemplation of the quirky dynamics at play in the confluence of names and athletic achievements.
The whimsical nature of this correlation, encapsulated in the scatterplot (Fig. 1), paints a delightful portrait of the comical yet compelling interplay between personal monikers and the saga of team dynamics. The narrative that emerges from our findings adds a refreshing dash of caprice to the fervent fervor of baseball, prompting us to appreciate the delightful unpredictability that underpins our beloved pastime.
This study, as whimsical as it may seem, has significant implications for understanding the idiosyncrasies of human experience and cultural phenomena. It is our hope that this investigation sparks further discourse and prompts a closer examination of the delightful yet unexpected confluence of nomenclature and athletic prowess. After all, the realm of sports linguistics and societal nomenclature abounds with a richness that invites continual exploration and discovery.
In light of these findings, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as the results of this study offer a robust and unequivocal confirmation of the interplay between the name "Ivory" and the Texas Rangers' performance in the American League West Division. It seems that when it comes to baseball dynamics, there truly may be more to a name than meets the eye.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Ivory Connection: A Study on the Interplay between the Popularity of the Name Ivory and the Texas Rangers' Performance in the American League West Division. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Sports Anthropology and Name-Based Performance Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Ivory Connection: A Study on the Interplay between the Popularity of the Name Ivory and the Texas Rangers' Performance in the American League West Division. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Sports and Nameology Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Ivory Connection: A Study on the Interplay between the Popularity of the Name Ivory and the Texas Rangers' Performance in the American League West Division with an abstract of This study investigates the curious relationship between the prevalence of the moniker "Ivory" and the standings of the Texas Rangers in the competitive landscape of the American League West Division. By delving into data from the US Social Security Administration and Baseball Reference spanning the years 1976 to 2022, our research team uncovered an unexpected correlation between the frequency of the name "Ivory" and the performance of the Texas Rangers. The correlation coefficient of 0.8382802 and p < 0.01 denotes a robust statistical connection, implying that there may be more to a name than meets the eye, especially when it comes to the triumphs and tribulations of a baseball team. This investigation offers a unique blend of sociolinguistics and sports analytics, unraveling a comical yet thought-provoking coalescence of nomenclature and athletic prowess. It is our hope that this study sparks further discussion and prompts a closer examination of the whimsical interplay between personal nomenclature and team performance, shedding light on the quirky dynamics that underpin our beloved pastimes.
ChatGPT:
Ivory, Texas Rangers, American League West Division, name prevalence, correlation, Social Security Administration data, Baseball Reference, sociolinguistics, sports analytics, team performance, nomenclature, whimsical interplay, team standings, baseball team, statistical connection, research study
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Popularity of the first name IvoryDetailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Ivory
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Ivory
Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position
Source: Baseball Reference
See what else correlates with Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.7027136 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 70.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Ivory) over the 47 years from 1976 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.0E-13. 0.0000000000001959480366205423
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.84 in 2.0E-11% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 5,103,393,824,438 random variables You don't actually need 5 trillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 46 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 46 because we have two variables measured over a period of 47 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.73, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | 1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990 | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Popularity of the first name Ivory (Babies born) | 100 | 116 | 125 | 166 | 149 | 137 | 258 | 244 | 193 | 201 | 180 | 172 | 182 | 161 | 183 | 173 | 157 | 183 | 159 | 132 | 162 | 143 | 187 | 181 | 172 | 182 | 154 | 180 | 141 | 181 | 163 | 158 | 166 | 141 | 146 | 175 | 281 | 331 | 406 | 431 | 491 | 517 | 501 | 569 | 518 | 565 | 628 |
Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position (Position) | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 31.4 | 30.1 | 28.6 | 27.2 | 28.3 | 0.976 | 29.3 | 30.3 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data.
In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.
For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.
(This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([100,116,125,166,149,137,258,244,193,201,180,172,182,161,183,173,157,183,159,132,162,143,187,181,172,182,154,180,141,181,163,158,166,141,146,175,281,331,406,431,491,517,501,569,518,565,628,])
array_2 = np.array([4,2,2,3,4,2,6,3,7,7,2,6,6,4,3,3,4,2,1,3,1,3,1,1,4,4,4,4,3,3,3,4,2,2,1,1,2,2,5,31.4,30.1,28.6,27.2,28.3,0.976,29.3,30.3,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Ivory"
array_2_name = "Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Popularity of the first name Ivory
- Line chart for only Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: The Ivory Connection: A Study on the Interplay between the Popularity of the Name Ivory and the Texas Rangers' Performance in the American League West Division
You're a rater extraordinaire!
Correlation ID: 1624 · Black Variable ID: 3924 · Red Variable ID: 205