Report an error
Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Votes for Libertarian Senators in Alaska | r=0.99 | 7yrs | No |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Hawaii | r=0.9 | 12yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the 'pepe' meme | r=0.88 | 17yrs | No |
Votes for the Libertarian Presidential candidate in Virginia | r=0.85 | 11yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Ivory | r=0.84 | 47yrs | Yes! |
The number of preschool special education teachers in Ohio | r=0.81 | 11yrs | No |
The number of firefighters in Texas | r=0.71 | 13yrs | No |
Golden State Warriors' Seasonal Total Wins | r=0.63 | 47yrs | No |
Texas Rangers' American League West Division finish position also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)