about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,558 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and the second variable is xkcd comics published about romance.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The decreasing GMO use in Michigan corn led to a resurgence of traditional corn qualities, including a romantic ambiance in the corn fields. This inspired the xkcd comic artist to shift focus from romance to the more captivating topic of non-GMO corn, inadvertently leading to a decrease in romance-themed xkcd comics.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a cutesy farmer happily reading an xkcd comic about romance in his cornfield in Michigan. He should be surrounded by genetically modified corn crops, and there is a sense of cheerfulness and contentment in the scene. Keep the colors bright and the overall aesthetic light-hearted and fun. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and xkcd comics published about romance. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Oragami Cutsy graphics Futuristic Data cyber art Cute cartoon
ChatGPT: Cutesy graphics

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and xkcd comics published about romance together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A farmer in a cornfield in Michigan is happily reading an xkcd comic about romance while checking on his genetically modified corn crops.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cutesy graphics ] and depicting this scene: A farmer in a cornfield in Michigan is happily reading an xkcd comic about romance while checking on his genetically modified corn crops. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a cutesy farmer happily reading an xkcd comic about romance in his cornfield in Michigan. He should be surrounded by genetically modified corn crops, and there is a sense of cheerfulness and contentment in the scene. Keep the colors bright and the overall aesthetic light-hearted and fun.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in Michigan caused xkcd comics published about romance to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
GMOs and Giggles: The Correlation between Corn Genetics in Michigan and Romance in xkcd Comics

The Journal of Agricultural Humor and Pop Culture

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and xkcd comics published about romance. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from USDA and AI analysis of xkcd comics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9432671 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
GMOs and Giggles: The Correlation between Corn Genetics in Michigan and Romance in xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a topic of much controversy and concern, particularly in the realm of food production. This study delves into the correlation between the use of GMOs in the cultivation of corn in Michigan and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics. The research team employed data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to analyze the prevalence of GMOs in corn grown in Michigan, and utilized advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis to quantify and assess the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics published from 2007 to 2023.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9432671 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn and the themes of romance depicted in xkcd comics during the studied period. This unexpected connection prompts further exploration and raises intriguing questions about the influence of agricultural practices on the popular culture representation of romantic relationships. It seems the corny GMO jokes keep appearing in unexpected places, just like a-maize-ing romance in xkcd comics. Our research provides valuable insight into the intersection of food production and pop culture, shedding light on the unexpected connections that lurk beneath the surface.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and xkcd comics published about romance. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMOs and Giggles: The Correlation between Corn Genetics in Michigan and Romance in xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a topic of much controversy and concern, particularly in the realm of food production. This study delves into the correlation between the use of GMOs in the cultivation of corn in Michigan and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics. The research team employed data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to analyze the prevalence of GMOs in corn grown in Michigan, and utilized advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis to quantify and assess the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics published from 2007 to 2023.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9432671 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn and the themes of romance depicted in xkcd comics during the studied period. This unexpected connection prompts further exploration and raises intriguing questions about the influence of agricultural practices on the popular culture representation of romantic relationships. It seems the corny GMO jokes keep appearing in unexpected places, just like a-maize-ing romance in xkcd comics. Our research provides valuable insight into the intersection of food production and pop culture, shedding light on the unexpected connections that lurk beneath the surface.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a subject of intense debate. Critics fear the long-term consequences of tampering with nature, while proponents laud the potential for increased crop yield and resistance to pests. Meanwhile, in the realm of popular culture, xkcd comics have been serving up a delightful concoction of humor, science, and romance. It seems that GMOs and xkcd comics might share more than just a penchant for acronyms - they could be entangled in a corny romance of their own. It's like they say, "GMOs and romance - it's all in the husk!"

In this study, we set out to investigate the possible connection between the prevalence of GMOs in corn grown in Michigan and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics. Utilizing data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and employing advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis, we sought to unravel the mystery behind the potential link between agroengineering and comic romance. One might say we were determined to peel back the layers of this enigmatic relationship, just like shucking an ear of corn.

The correlation coefficient of 0.9432671 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analysis was as surprising as finding a corny joke in a dad's repertoire. It appears that the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn is intertwined with the themes of romance depicted in xkcd comics. This unexpected correlation challenges conventional wisdom and provokes speculation about the impact of agricultural practices on the portrayal of romantic relationships in popular culture. It's almost as if the GMOs are whispering sweet nothings into the ears of xkcd comics, creating an unexpected symphony of love and maize.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and xkcd comics published about romance. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMOs and Giggles: The Correlation between Corn Genetics in Michigan and Romance in xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a topic of much controversy and concern, particularly in the realm of food production. This study delves into the correlation between the use of GMOs in the cultivation of corn in Michigan and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics. The research team employed data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to analyze the prevalence of GMOs in corn grown in Michigan, and utilized advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis to quantify and assess the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics published from 2007 to 2023.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9432671 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn and the themes of romance depicted in xkcd comics during the studied period. This unexpected connection prompts further exploration and raises intriguing questions about the influence of agricultural practices on the popular culture representation of romantic relationships. It seems the corny GMO jokes keep appearing in unexpected places, just like a-maize-ing romance in xkcd comics. Our research provides valuable insight into the intersection of food production and pop culture, shedding light on the unexpected connections that lurk beneath the surface.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a subject of intense debate. Critics fear the long-term consequences of tampering with nature, while proponents laud the potential for increased crop yield and resistance to pests. Meanwhile, in the realm of popular culture, xkcd comics have been serving up a delightful concoction of humor, science, and romance. It seems that GMOs and xkcd comics might share more than just a penchant for acronyms - they could be entangled in a corny romance of their own. It's like they say, "GMOs and romance - it's all in the husk!"
In this study, we set out to investigate the possible connection between the prevalence of GMOs in corn grown in Michigan and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics. Utilizing data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and employing advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis, we sought to unravel the mystery behind the potential link between agroengineering and comic romance. One might say we were determined to peel back the layers of this enigmatic relationship, just like shucking an ear of corn.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9432671 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analysis was as surprising as finding a corny joke in a dad's repertoire. It appears that the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn is intertwined with the themes of romance depicted in xkcd comics. This unexpected correlation challenges conventional wisdom and provokes speculation about the impact of agricultural practices on the portrayal of romantic relationships in popular culture. It's almost as if the GMOs are whispering sweet nothings into the ears of xkcd comics, creating an unexpected symphony of love and maize.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous studies have examined the impact of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture on various aspects of food production and environmental sustainability. Smith and colleagues (2015) investigated the effects of GMO use in corn cultivation on crop yields and pest resistance, while Doe (2018) explored consumer perceptions and concerns regarding GMOs in food products. Jones (2020) conducted a comprehensive review of the regulatory frameworks governing GMO cultivation and distribution in the United States. It appears these researchers were trying to "ketchup" with the latest developments in GMO technology.

In "The Omnivore's Dilemma," Pollan (2006) provided a thought-provoking critique of industrial agriculture and its repercussions on the broader food ecosystem. Similarly, Schlosser (2001) in "Fast Food Nation" examined the impact of agroindustry on food production and the environment. Meanwhile, in the realm of fiction, Atwood's "Oryx and Crake" (2003) presented a dystopian narrative that delved into the consequences of genetic engineering and corporate control of food sources. It's almost as if these authors were "cob-ing" the kernels of truth about GMOs in their narratives.

Turning to popular culture, the film "Food, Inc." (2008) offered a compelling exposé of the industrial food production system in the United States, touching on themes of genetic modification and agricultural practices. In a different vein, the documentary "King Corn" (2007) followed two college friends as they planted and harvested an acre of corn in Iowa, shedding light on the role of corn in American agriculture and the food industry. It seems these films were "popping" with insights about GMOs and corn cultivation.

While the connection between GMO use in Michigan corn and themes of romance in xkcd comics may initially appear tenuous, our analysis suggests a robust correlation between these seemingly disparate domains. This unexpected association calls for further investigation and invites speculation about the influence of agricultural practices on the portrayal of romantic relationships in popular culture. It seems that GMOs and romance are "stalking" each other in unexpected ways, much like the characters in a suspenseful love story.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and xkcd comics published about romance. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and AI analysis of xkcd comics . You used data from 2007 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMOs and Giggles: The Correlation between Corn Genetics in Michigan and Romance in xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a topic of much controversy and concern, particularly in the realm of food production. This study delves into the correlation between the use of GMOs in the cultivation of corn in Michigan and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics. The research team employed data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to analyze the prevalence of GMOs in corn grown in Michigan, and utilized advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis to quantify and assess the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics published from 2007 to 2023.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9432671 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn and the themes of romance depicted in xkcd comics during the studied period. This unexpected connection prompts further exploration and raises intriguing questions about the influence of agricultural practices on the popular culture representation of romantic relationships. It seems the corny GMO jokes keep appearing in unexpected places, just like a-maize-ing romance in xkcd comics. Our research provides valuable insight into the intersection of food production and pop culture, shedding light on the unexpected connections that lurk beneath the surface.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a subject of intense debate. Critics fear the long-term consequences of tampering with nature, while proponents laud the potential for increased crop yield and resistance to pests. Meanwhile, in the realm of popular culture, xkcd comics have been serving up a delightful concoction of humor, science, and romance. It seems that GMOs and xkcd comics might share more than just a penchant for acronyms - they could be entangled in a corny romance of their own. It's like they say, "GMOs and romance - it's all in the husk!"
In this study, we set out to investigate the possible connection between the prevalence of GMOs in corn grown in Michigan and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics. Utilizing data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and employing advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis, we sought to unravel the mystery behind the potential link between agroengineering and comic romance. One might say we were determined to peel back the layers of this enigmatic relationship, just like shucking an ear of corn.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9432671 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analysis was as surprising as finding a corny joke in a dad's repertoire. It appears that the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn is intertwined with the themes of romance depicted in xkcd comics. This unexpected correlation challenges conventional wisdom and provokes speculation about the impact of agricultural practices on the portrayal of romantic relationships in popular culture. It's almost as if the GMOs are whispering sweet nothings into the ears of xkcd comics, creating an unexpected symphony of love and maize.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To delve into the possible correlation between the prevalence of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Michigan corn and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics, a multifaceted approach was undertaken. Data on GMO usage in corn cultivation in Michigan was gathered from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) records, with a keen eye for those juicy bits of information that would help us crack this cornundrum. The information collected included the types of GMOs employed, their respective adoption rates, and the total acreage of GMO corn grown in Michigan. It was essential to ensure that our data collection process was as thorough as a cornstalk's growth in fertile soil.

Simultaneously, an advanced artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm was developed and trained to analyze the themes and portrayal of romance in xkcd comics published from 2007 to 2023. This algorithm was designed to detect and quantify characteristics such as romantic encounters, love-based puns, and heartwarming moments, while filtering out irrelevant content with the precision of a chef separating corn kernels from the cob.

The resulting data from both sources were then harmonized and cross-referenced to identify potential relationships or patterns, akin to the way two star-crossed kernels of corn find each other in a crowded cob. Through a combination of statistical analyses, including correlation coefficients and regression models, we sought to unveil any underlying connections between these seemingly disparate domains of GMO agriculture and web-based comic art. It was as if we were peering inside the husk of a mystery, eager to reveal the kernels of truth buried within.

To validate the findings and address any potential confounding variables, sensitivity analyses were performed, examining the impact of factors such as regional climate variations, demographic shifts, and cultural trends on the observed relationship. Additionally, a series of control experiments were conducted to ascertain that the identified correlation was not merely the result of a kernel of coincidence, but a genuine linkage worthy of further scholarly consideration.

The details of our methodological framework aim to provide a transparent and rigorous examination of the interconnectedness between GMO usage in Michigan corn and the thematic representation of romance in xkcd comics. Just as a good corny joke has layers of humor waiting to be unraveled, our methodology peels back the layers of this intriguing relationship, shedding light on the unexpected connections that lurk within the fields of agriculture and popular culture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and xkcd comics published about romance. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and AI analysis of xkcd comics .

For the time period 2007 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9432671, r-squared of 0.8897529, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMOs and Giggles: The Correlation between Corn Genetics in Michigan and Romance in xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a topic of much controversy and concern, particularly in the realm of food production. This study delves into the correlation between the use of GMOs in the cultivation of corn in Michigan and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics. The research team employed data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to analyze the prevalence of GMOs in corn grown in Michigan, and utilized advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis to quantify and assess the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics published from 2007 to 2023.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9432671 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn and the themes of romance depicted in xkcd comics during the studied period. This unexpected connection prompts further exploration and raises intriguing questions about the influence of agricultural practices on the popular culture representation of romantic relationships. It seems the corny GMO jokes keep appearing in unexpected places, just like a-maize-ing romance in xkcd comics. Our research provides valuable insight into the intersection of food production and pop culture, shedding light on the unexpected connections that lurk beneath the surface.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a subject of intense debate. Critics fear the long-term consequences of tampering with nature, while proponents laud the potential for increased crop yield and resistance to pests. Meanwhile, in the realm of popular culture, xkcd comics have been serving up a delightful concoction of humor, science, and romance. It seems that GMOs and xkcd comics might share more than just a penchant for acronyms - they could be entangled in a corny romance of their own. It's like they say, "GMOs and romance - it's all in the husk!"
In this study, we set out to investigate the possible connection between the prevalence of GMOs in corn grown in Michigan and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics. Utilizing data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and employing advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis, we sought to unravel the mystery behind the potential link between agroengineering and comic romance. One might say we were determined to peel back the layers of this enigmatic relationship, just like shucking an ear of corn.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9432671 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analysis was as surprising as finding a corny joke in a dad's repertoire. It appears that the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn is intertwined with the themes of romance depicted in xkcd comics. This unexpected correlation challenges conventional wisdom and provokes speculation about the impact of agricultural practices on the portrayal of romantic relationships in popular culture. It's almost as if the GMOs are whispering sweet nothings into the ears of xkcd comics, creating an unexpected symphony of love and maize.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9432671 between the prevalence of GMOs in corn grown in Michigan and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics published from 2007 to 2023. This correlation implies a significant statistical relationship between these two seemingly unrelated domains, akin to finding a kernel of truth in a field of corn.

Furthermore, the computed r-squared value of 0.8897529 indicates that approximately 89% of the variation in the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics can be explained by the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn. This notable explanatory power of GMO prevalence on the romantic content of xkcd comics is as compelling as a well-crafted pun.

The significance level (p < 0.01) further substantiates the robustness of the observed relationship, providing strong evidence that the correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. This result is as rare as finding a genetically unmodified unicorn in a cornfield.

The accompanying scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation between the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn and the themes of romance in xkcd comics. The scatterplot illustrates the intertwined nature of these variables, underscoring the unexpected connection between agricultural practices and the portrayal of romantic relationships in popular culture. It's almost as if the corn and the comic are locked in a dance as enchanting as a moonlit stroll through a field of genetically modified sweethearts.

In conclusion, our findings highlight the fascinating association between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and the themes of romance in xkcd comics. This unanticipated correlation paves the way for further exploration into the influences of agricultural practices on cultural expression, demonstrating that what may appear as unrelated elements can indeed be intertwined in a delightfully intriguing manner. This research adds a new dimension to the discourse on GMOs and popular culture, reminding us that sometimes, the most unexpected connections can blossom like a cornstalk in the summer sun.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and xkcd comics published about romance. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
GMOs and Giggles: The Correlation between Corn Genetics in Michigan and Romance in xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a topic of much controversy and concern, particularly in the realm of food production. This study delves into the correlation between the use of GMOs in the cultivation of corn in Michigan and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics. The research team employed data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to analyze the prevalence of GMOs in corn grown in Michigan, and utilized advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis to quantify and assess the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics published from 2007 to 2023.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9432671 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn and the themes of romance depicted in xkcd comics during the studied period. This unexpected connection prompts further exploration and raises intriguing questions about the influence of agricultural practices on the popular culture representation of romantic relationships. It seems the corny GMO jokes keep appearing in unexpected places, just like a-maize-ing romance in xkcd comics. Our research provides valuable insight into the intersection of food production and pop culture, shedding light on the unexpected connections that lurk beneath the surface.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous studies have examined the impact of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture on various aspects of food production and environmental sustainability. Smith and colleagues (2015) investigated the effects of GMO use in corn cultivation on crop yields and pest resistance, while Doe (2018) explored consumer perceptions and concerns regarding GMOs in food products. Jones (2020) conducted a comprehensive review of the regulatory frameworks governing GMO cultivation and distribution in the United States. It appears these researchers were trying to "ketchup" with the latest developments in GMO technology.
In "The Omnivore's Dilemma," Pollan (2006) provided a thought-provoking critique of industrial agriculture and its repercussions on the broader food ecosystem. Similarly, Schlosser (2001) in "Fast Food Nation" examined the impact of agroindustry on food production and the environment. Meanwhile, in the realm of fiction, Atwood's "Oryx and Crake" (2003) presented a dystopian narrative that delved into the consequences of genetic engineering and corporate control of food sources. It's almost as if these authors were "cob-ing" the kernels of truth about GMOs in their narratives.
Turning to popular culture, the film "Food, Inc." (2008) offered a compelling exposé of the industrial food production system in the United States, touching on themes of genetic modification and agricultural practices. In a different vein, the documentary "King Corn" (2007) followed two college friends as they planted and harvested an acre of corn in Iowa, shedding light on the role of corn in American agriculture and the food industry. It seems these films were "popping" with insights about GMOs and corn cultivation.
While the connection between GMO use in Michigan corn and themes of romance in xkcd comics may initially appear tenuous, our analysis suggests a robust correlation between these seemingly disparate domains. This unexpected association calls for further investigation and invites speculation about the influence of agricultural practices on the portrayal of romantic relationships in popular culture. It seems that GMOs and romance are "stalking" each other in unexpected ways, much like the characters in a suspenseful love story.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9432671 between the prevalence of GMOs in corn grown in Michigan and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics published from 2007 to 2023. This correlation implies a significant statistical relationship between these two seemingly unrelated domains, akin to finding a kernel of truth in a field of corn.
Furthermore, the computed r-squared value of 0.8897529 indicates that approximately 89% of the variation in the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics can be explained by the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn. This notable explanatory power of GMO prevalence on the romantic content of xkcd comics is as compelling as a well-crafted pun.
The significance level (p < 0.01) further substantiates the robustness of the observed relationship, providing strong evidence that the correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. This result is as rare as finding a genetically unmodified unicorn in a cornfield.
The accompanying scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation between the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn and the themes of romance in xkcd comics. The scatterplot illustrates the intertwined nature of these variables, underscoring the unexpected connection between agricultural practices and the portrayal of romantic relationships in popular culture. It's almost as if the corn and the comic are locked in a dance as enchanting as a moonlit stroll through a field of genetically modified sweethearts.
In conclusion, our findings highlight the fascinating association between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and the themes of romance in xkcd comics. This unanticipated correlation paves the way for further exploration into the influences of agricultural practices on cultural expression, demonstrating that what may appear as unrelated elements can indeed be intertwined in a delightfully intriguing manner. This research adds a new dimension to the discourse on GMOs and popular culture, reminding us that sometimes, the most unexpected connections can blossom like a cornstalk in the summer sun.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study confirm and extend prior research on the influence of agricultural practices on unexpected cultural domains, shedding light on the "ear-resistible" connection between GMO use in Michigan corn and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics. Our findings align with the work of Smith and colleagues (2015), who investigated the effects of GMOs on crop yields and pest resistance, and amplify the "corny" humor present in the relationship between agricultural practices and popular culture representations of romance.

The strong correlation coefficient of 0.9432671 between GMO prevalence in Michigan corn and romantic themes in xkcd comics supports and even "crops" the earlier observations made by Pollan (2006) and Schlosser (2001) about the far-reaching impact of agricultural practices on broader cultural narratives. It seems the influence of GMOs on popular culture is not just a "stalk" tale after all.

Our results also provide a "pop" of fresh insight into the broader conversation initiated by Atwood (2003) and the films "Food, Inc." (2008) and "King Corn" (2007). While these works delved into the consequences of genetic engineering and industrial agriculture, our findings reveal an unexpected link between GMO prevalence and the portrayal of romantic relationships in popular culture. It's as if the tendrils of GMOs have "kernelled" their way into the world of romance, creating a narrative as captivating as any found in literature or film.

The explanatory power of GMO prevalence on the romantic content of xkcd comics, as indicated by the computed r-squared value of 0.8897529, is as compelling as a well-crafted pun. This statistical evidence not only supports but also amplifies the "stalk" of the unexpected relationship between agricultural practices and romantic themes in popular culture. It seems that the correlation between GMO prevalence in Michigan corn and romance in xkcd comics is as hard to resist as a "corny" dad joke.

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a surprising and robust correlation between GMO use in Michigan corn and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics. This unexpected relationship invites further exploration into the influences of agricultural practices on cultural expression, demonstrating that what may appear as unrelated elements can indeed be intertwined in a delightfully intriguing manner. It seems that sometimes, the most unexpected connections can pop up in the most "corny" places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and xkcd comics published about romance. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
GMOs and Giggles: The Correlation between Corn Genetics in Michigan and Romance in xkcd Comics

[[ABSTRACT]]
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a topic of much controversy and concern, particularly in the realm of food production. This study delves into the correlation between the use of GMOs in the cultivation of corn in Michigan and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics. The research team employed data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to analyze the prevalence of GMOs in corn grown in Michigan, and utilized advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis to quantify and assess the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics published from 2007 to 2023.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9432671 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn and the themes of romance depicted in xkcd comics during the studied period. This unexpected connection prompts further exploration and raises intriguing questions about the influence of agricultural practices on the popular culture representation of romantic relationships. It seems the corny GMO jokes keep appearing in unexpected places, just like a-maize-ing romance in xkcd comics. Our research provides valuable insight into the intersection of food production and pop culture, shedding light on the unexpected connections that lurk beneath the surface.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a subject of intense debate. Critics fear the long-term consequences of tampering with nature, while proponents laud the potential for increased crop yield and resistance to pests. Meanwhile, in the realm of popular culture, xkcd comics have been serving up a delightful concoction of humor, science, and romance. It seems that GMOs and xkcd comics might share more than just a penchant for acronyms - they could be entangled in a corny romance of their own. It's like they say, "GMOs and romance - it's all in the husk!"
In this study, we set out to investigate the possible connection between the prevalence of GMOs in corn grown in Michigan and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics. Utilizing data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and employing advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis, we sought to unravel the mystery behind the potential link between agroengineering and comic romance. One might say we were determined to peel back the layers of this enigmatic relationship, just like shucking an ear of corn.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9432671 and p < 0.01 that emerged from our analysis was as surprising as finding a corny joke in a dad's repertoire. It appears that the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn is intertwined with the themes of romance depicted in xkcd comics. This unexpected correlation challenges conventional wisdom and provokes speculation about the impact of agricultural practices on the portrayal of romantic relationships in popular culture. It's almost as if the GMOs are whispering sweet nothings into the ears of xkcd comics, creating an unexpected symphony of love and maize.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong correlation coefficient of 0.9432671 between the prevalence of GMOs in corn grown in Michigan and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics published from 2007 to 2023. This correlation implies a significant statistical relationship between these two seemingly unrelated domains, akin to finding a kernel of truth in a field of corn.
Furthermore, the computed r-squared value of 0.8897529 indicates that approximately 89% of the variation in the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics can be explained by the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn. This notable explanatory power of GMO prevalence on the romantic content of xkcd comics is as compelling as a well-crafted pun.
The significance level (p < 0.01) further substantiates the robustness of the observed relationship, providing strong evidence that the correlation is unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. This result is as rare as finding a genetically unmodified unicorn in a cornfield.
The accompanying scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation between the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn and the themes of romance in xkcd comics. The scatterplot illustrates the intertwined nature of these variables, underscoring the unexpected connection between agricultural practices and the portrayal of romantic relationships in popular culture. It's almost as if the corn and the comic are locked in a dance as enchanting as a moonlit stroll through a field of genetically modified sweethearts.
In conclusion, our findings highlight the fascinating association between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and the themes of romance in xkcd comics. This unanticipated correlation paves the way for further exploration into the influences of agricultural practices on cultural expression, demonstrating that what may appear as unrelated elements can indeed be intertwined in a delightfully intriguing manner. This research adds a new dimension to the discourse on GMOs and popular culture, reminding us that sometimes, the most unexpected connections can blossom like a cornstalk in the summer sun.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unveiled a remarkably robust correlation between the prevalence of GMOs in corn cultivated in Michigan and the representation of romance in xkcd comics. The strong coefficient of 0.9432671 and p < 0.01 provide compelling evidence of a significant relationship, akin to finding a "stalk" of truth in a field of corny jokes. This unexpected connection underscores the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and cultural expression, revealing that GMOs and romantic musings may not be as distant as they seem. It's as if these elements are engaging in a "kernel romance," cultivating a relationship that transcends conventional boundaries.

Our findings invite further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this intriguing correlation, but for now, it seems that GMOs and xkcd comics have indeed found themselves entwined in a "maize-y" romance. Our research not only contributes to the understanding of GMO impacts but also adds a touch of humor to the scholarly discourse, proving that even in the world of academic research, there's room for a good dad joke or two.

Moreover, the results of this study prompt a reconsideration of the intertwining influences of agricultural practices and popular culture, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary perspectives in understanding these seemingly distinct domains. It's like finding unexpected kernels of wisdom in a cornfield of conventional thinking - a-maize-ing, isn't it?

Therefore, based on the compelling evidence presented, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. It appears that the corny romance between GMOs and xkcd comics is indeed a-maize-ingly definitive.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited GMOs and Giggles: The Correlation between Corn Genetics in Michigan and Romance in xkcd Comics. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Humor and Pop Culture


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited GMOs and Giggles: The Correlation between Corn Genetics in Michigan and Romance in xkcd Comics. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Applied Agricultural Amusement


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled GMOs and Giggles: The Correlation between Corn Genetics in Michigan and Romance in xkcd Comics with an abstract of Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a topic of much controversy and concern, particularly in the realm of food production. This study delves into the correlation between the use of GMOs in the cultivation of corn in Michigan and the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics. The research team employed data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to analyze the prevalence of GMOs in corn grown in Michigan, and utilized advanced artificial intelligence (AI) analysis to quantify and assess the portrayal of romance in xkcd comics published from 2007 to 2023.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9432671 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong relationship between the prevalence of GMOs in Michigan corn and the themes of romance depicted in xkcd comics during the studied period. This unexpected connection prompts further exploration and raises intriguing questions about the influence of agricultural practices on the popular culture representation of romantic relationships. It seems the corny GMO jokes keep appearing in unexpected places, just like a-maize-ing romance in xkcd comics. Our research provides valuable insight into the intersection of food production and pop culture, shedding light on the unexpected connections that lurk beneath the surface.

ChatGPT:

GMOs, genetically modified organisms, corn genetics, Michigan, xkcd comics, romance portrayal, USDA data, AI analysis, correlation coefficient, popular culture, agricultural practices, romantic relationships, food production, pop culture representation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Michigan
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Michigan that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Michigan

xkcd comics published about romance
Detailed data title: The number of xkcd comics published each year about romance
Source: AI analysis of xkcd comics
Additional Info: I designed a Python workflow to perform OCR on every xkcd comic, feed that text into a large language model, and ask the model whether this comic was about the category named in the title.

See what else correlates with xkcd comics published about romance

Correlation r = 0.9432671 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8897529 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89% of the change in the one variable (i.e., xkcd comics published about romance) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Michigan) over the 17 years from 2007 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.4E-8. 0.0000000140172927395030490000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 1.4E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 71,340,452 random variables You don't actually need 71 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.85, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in Michigan (GMO corn %)1915131111842231232322
xkcd comics published about romance (xkcd comics)38352128111834323115635




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([19,15,13,11,11,8,4,2,2,3,1,2,3,2,3,2,2,])
array_2 = np.array([38,35,21,28,11,18,3,4,3,2,3,1,1,5,6,3,5,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Michigan"
array_2_name = "xkcd comics published about romance"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 1558 · Black Variable ID: 714 · Red Variable ID: 20013
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0