about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,531 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Associates degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies and the second variable is Google searches for 'tummy ache'.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The sheer breadth of knowledge encompassed in Multi/interdisciplinary studies led to graduates developing a 'full spectrum' understanding of all the potential causes of stomach discomfort, from existential angst to the aerodynamics of burrito consumption. In other words, they had a 'holistic' grasp of digestive dilemmas!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] In a cozy library, a smiling graduate in a cap and gown receives an Associates degree in Multi/interdisciplinary studies from a professor. Nearby, a concerned parent sits in an armchair using a laptop to search "tummy ache" on Google, as their child rests their head on their lap. The library shelves are filled with books, and warm sunlight streams in through the windows, creating a comforting atmosphere. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Associates degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic A photo-realistic image A scene from Skyrim Glitch art Cubism
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Associates degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies and Google searches for 'tummy ache' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy library, a smiling graduate in a cap and gown receives an Associates degree in Multi/interdisciplinary studies from a professor. Nearby, a concerned parent uses a laptop to search "tummy ache" on Google, as their child rests their head on their lap.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy library, a smiling graduate in a cap and gown receives an Associates degree in Multi/interdisciplinary studies from a professor. Nearby, a concerned parent uses a laptop to search "tummy ache" on Google, as their child rests their head on their lap. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] In a cozy library, a smiling graduate in a cap and gown receives an Associates degree in Multi/interdisciplinary studies from a professor. Nearby, a concerned parent sits in an armchair using a laptop to search "tummy ache" on Google, as their child rests their head on their lap. The library shelves are filled with books, and warm sunlight streams in through the windows, creating a comforting atmosphere.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Associates degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies caused tummy ache (Google searches for 'tummy ache') to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Belly of the Beast: An Examination of the Association Between Associates Degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'

Journal of Whimsical Interdisciplinary Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9828226 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Belly of the Beast: An Examination of the Association Between Associates Degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the conferring of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches related to 'tummy ache' over a decade. Leveraging data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our analysis yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9828226 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. While one might argue that this correlation is purely coincidental, the findings prompt a closer examination of the gastro-intestinal implications of academic pursuits, and perhaps, the lingering effects of stress-induced snacking among interdisciplinary scholars. This research paves the way for a broader discussion on the subtle yet palpable impact of academic endeavors on the well-being of both aspiring scholars and the broader populace. The study also offers a gentle reminder that even the most seemingly unrelated subjects may have unexpected connections - both within academia and the realm of digestive discomfort.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Belly of the Beast: An Examination of the Association Between Associates Degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the conferring of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches related to 'tummy ache' over a decade. Leveraging data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our analysis yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9828226 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. While one might argue that this correlation is purely coincidental, the findings prompt a closer examination of the gastro-intestinal implications of academic pursuits, and perhaps, the lingering effects of stress-induced snacking among interdisciplinary scholars. This research paves the way for a broader discussion on the subtle yet palpable impact of academic endeavors on the well-being of both aspiring scholars and the broader populace. The study also offers a gentle reminder that even the most seemingly unrelated subjects may have unexpected connections - both within academia and the realm of digestive discomfort.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The realm of academia is often characterized by its dedication to uncovering the complex, the obscure, and the unexpected. Within this context, we find ourselves drawn to the curious connection between the conferral of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. At first glance, one might be inclined to dismiss this correlation as purely coincidental. However, as with any scientific inquiry, we cannot overlook the possibility of an intriguing relationship waiting to be unveiled.

As we delve into this study, we are compelled to contemplate the gastronomic implications of academic pursuits. We are left to ponder the potential stresses and strains experienced by those venturing into the multifaceted landscape of interdisciplinary studies. Could it be that the pursuit of knowledge and the integration of varied subject matters manifest themselves in the form of gastrointestinal unease? Or perhaps, the correlation lies in the equally perplexing realm of stress-induced snacking among the scholarly elite. While these notions may elicit a chuckle, we must not overlook the potential significance of this correlation, no matter how amusing it may seem at first glance.

One cannot help but revel in the unconventional nature of this inquiry. After all, who would have thought that associates degrees and tummy aches could be entwined in such an intriguing dance of data and statistics? Our compulsion to dissect this improbable relationship serves as a testament to the boundless realms of inquiry that await us, even in the most unexpected corners of human experience. Indeed, the convergence of academia and gastrointestinal discomfort may seem like a comical coincidence. Still, this convergence serves as a gentle reminder of the intricate and often amusing interplay between seemingly unrelated variables within the tapestry of scientific exploration.

As we embark on this academic odyssey, we are reminded that even the most seemingly trivial and whimsical connections may harbor unexpected insights. It is in the spirit of curiosity, humor, and robust inquiry that we present our findings and invite fellow seekers of knowledge to join us in this peculiar yet enlightening expedition through the curious terrain of academic pursuit and digestive disquiet.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Belly of the Beast: An Examination of the Association Between Associates Degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the conferring of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches related to 'tummy ache' over a decade. Leveraging data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our analysis yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9828226 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. While one might argue that this correlation is purely coincidental, the findings prompt a closer examination of the gastro-intestinal implications of academic pursuits, and perhaps, the lingering effects of stress-induced snacking among interdisciplinary scholars. This research paves the way for a broader discussion on the subtle yet palpable impact of academic endeavors on the well-being of both aspiring scholars and the broader populace. The study also offers a gentle reminder that even the most seemingly unrelated subjects may have unexpected connections - both within academia and the realm of digestive discomfort.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The realm of academia is often characterized by its dedication to uncovering the complex, the obscure, and the unexpected. Within this context, we find ourselves drawn to the curious connection between the conferral of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. At first glance, one might be inclined to dismiss this correlation as purely coincidental. However, as with any scientific inquiry, we cannot overlook the possibility of an intriguing relationship waiting to be unveiled.
As we delve into this study, we are compelled to contemplate the gastronomic implications of academic pursuits. We are left to ponder the potential stresses and strains experienced by those venturing into the multifaceted landscape of interdisciplinary studies. Could it be that the pursuit of knowledge and the integration of varied subject matters manifest themselves in the form of gastrointestinal unease? Or perhaps, the correlation lies in the equally perplexing realm of stress-induced snacking among the scholarly elite. While these notions may elicit a chuckle, we must not overlook the potential significance of this correlation, no matter how amusing it may seem at first glance.
One cannot help but revel in the unconventional nature of this inquiry. After all, who would have thought that associates degrees and tummy aches could be entwined in such an intriguing dance of data and statistics? Our compulsion to dissect this improbable relationship serves as a testament to the boundless realms of inquiry that await us, even in the most unexpected corners of human experience. Indeed, the convergence of academia and gastrointestinal discomfort may seem like a comical coincidence. Still, this convergence serves as a gentle reminder of the intricate and often amusing interplay between seemingly unrelated variables within the tapestry of scientific exploration.
As we embark on this academic odyssey, we are reminded that even the most seemingly trivial and whimsical connections may harbor unexpected insights. It is in the spirit of curiosity, humor, and robust inquiry that we present our findings and invite fellow seekers of knowledge to join us in this peculiar yet enlightening expedition through the curious terrain of academic pursuit and digestive disquiet.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the realm of academic inquiry, the peculiar and unexpected often beckon to be explored. This study of the association between the conferral of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache' embarks upon a journey that may initially appear whimsical, but holds the potential for enlightening insights.

Smith and Doe (2015) assert that interdisciplinary studies contribute to the cultivation of critical thinking and adaptability, suggesting that the pursuit of such degrees may stimulate cognitive processes extending beyond disciplinary boundaries. Jones et al. (2018) further delve into the multifaceted nature of interdisciplinary education, highlighting the cognitive flexibility and heightened problem-solving abilities that might result from navigating diverse academic realms.

However, as we venture deeper into the enigmatic relationship between academic pursuits and gastronomic expressions of unease, our exploration encounters unexpected companions. "The Interdisciplinary Mind: An Inquiry into Academic Versatility" by R. Eadrem delves into the intricacies of cognitive integration across disciplines, shedding light on the potential mental gymnastics undertaken by students of Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies. Additionally, "Mind Over Matter: Integrating Spheres of Knowledge" by K. E. Ero then beckons the reader to contemplate the mental and, by extension, gastrointestinal acrobatics intertwined with academic expansion.

As our quest for knowledge transcends traditional boundaries, we confront the unexpected intermingling of fiction and academic discourse. "The Uncharted Digestive Realms: An Epic of Gastronomic Adventure" by Y. R. Hunge leads us through a whimsical yet insightful tale exploring the perils and triumphs of gastronomic exploration, paralleling the uncharted territories of interdisciplinary academia. Furthermore, "The Digestive Chronicles: Tales of Unlikely Connections" by A. S. Earch comments on the intertwining of seemingly unrelated elements, mirroring the journey of our own inquiry.

Turning to unexpected sources for illumination, the authors have engaged with children's cartoons and shows, such as "The Stomach Saga" and "Tummy Troubles with Timmy," to gain a lighthearted but meaningful understanding of the ways in which popular culture portrays and possibly perpetuates narratives surrounding gastric discomfort. These seemingly innocuous encounters have provided valuable perspectives, demonstrating the unexpected intersections between childhood whimsy and scholarly pursuits.

As we navigate this scholarly odyssey, ever aware of the unexpected tangents that inform our journey, we are reminded of the whimsical yet profoundly enlightening pathways that entwine seemingly unrelated topics. This synthesis of academic pursuit and digestive incongruity underscores the delightful, and at times absurd, interplay between the most unexpected variables within the tapestry of scientific exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Belly of the Beast: An Examination of the Association Between Associates Degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the conferring of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches related to 'tummy ache' over a decade. Leveraging data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our analysis yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9828226 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. While one might argue that this correlation is purely coincidental, the findings prompt a closer examination of the gastro-intestinal implications of academic pursuits, and perhaps, the lingering effects of stress-induced snacking among interdisciplinary scholars. This research paves the way for a broader discussion on the subtle yet palpable impact of academic endeavors on the well-being of both aspiring scholars and the broader populace. The study also offers a gentle reminder that even the most seemingly unrelated subjects may have unexpected connections - both within academia and the realm of digestive discomfort.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The realm of academia is often characterized by its dedication to uncovering the complex, the obscure, and the unexpected. Within this context, we find ourselves drawn to the curious connection between the conferral of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. At first glance, one might be inclined to dismiss this correlation as purely coincidental. However, as with any scientific inquiry, we cannot overlook the possibility of an intriguing relationship waiting to be unveiled.
As we delve into this study, we are compelled to contemplate the gastronomic implications of academic pursuits. We are left to ponder the potential stresses and strains experienced by those venturing into the multifaceted landscape of interdisciplinary studies. Could it be that the pursuit of knowledge and the integration of varied subject matters manifest themselves in the form of gastrointestinal unease? Or perhaps, the correlation lies in the equally perplexing realm of stress-induced snacking among the scholarly elite. While these notions may elicit a chuckle, we must not overlook the potential significance of this correlation, no matter how amusing it may seem at first glance.
One cannot help but revel in the unconventional nature of this inquiry. After all, who would have thought that associates degrees and tummy aches could be entwined in such an intriguing dance of data and statistics? Our compulsion to dissect this improbable relationship serves as a testament to the boundless realms of inquiry that await us, even in the most unexpected corners of human experience. Indeed, the convergence of academia and gastrointestinal discomfort may seem like a comical coincidence. Still, this convergence serves as a gentle reminder of the intricate and often amusing interplay between seemingly unrelated variables within the tapestry of scientific exploration.
As we embark on this academic odyssey, we are reminded that even the most seemingly trivial and whimsical connections may harbor unexpected insights. It is in the spirit of curiosity, humor, and robust inquiry that we present our findings and invite fellow seekers of knowledge to join us in this peculiar yet enlightening expedition through the curious terrain of academic pursuit and digestive disquiet.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection and Processing
Our research endeavors commenced with an expedition through the virtual expanse of data repositories and search engine archives, akin to intrepid explorers venturing into uncharted terrain. We sourced data pertaining to the conferral of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), sifting through their archives with meticulous attention to detail. Concurrently, we immersed ourselves in the troves of Google Trends, tracking the ebb and flow of 'tummy ache' searches over the same temporal expanse. This virtual odyssey through the digital labyrinth yielded a plethora of quantitative nuggets, each capturing a fleeting moment in the annals of academic achievement and gastrointestinal distress.

Selection of Temporal Bounds
Much like sketching the boundaries of uncharted territories, we consciously delineated the temporal bounds of our study to encapsulate the years from 2011 to 2021. This period was chosen with the precision of a culinary maestro, aiming to encompass a decade teeming with socio-educational flux and digital ripples. The significance of this temporal span lies not merely in its numerical variance but also in the nuances it harbors, akin to the subtle flavors that permeate a well-crafted dish.

Statistical Analysis
In the spirit of disentangling the enigmatic threads of our data, we harnessed the power of statistical tools with the finesse of a seasoned maestro. The Spearman rank correlation coefficient emerged as our compass through the maze of associative patterns, guiding us with its unerring arrow to the heart of the numerical concordance. To ascertain the strength and direction of the relationship between Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and Google searches for 'tummy ache', this coefficient became our unwavering lodestar, illuminating the path towards clarity amidst the statistical obscurity. Additionally, within the realm of statistical significance, we set our sights on a p-value threshold of p < 0.01, akin to the discerning palate of a seasoned gourmet, ensuring that only the most compelling relationships would be deemed worthy of attention.

Ethical Considerations
As scholars wading through the murky waters of research, we remained steadfast in our commitment to ethical rigor and academic integrity. All data utilized in our study were harnessed with due diligence and respect for the integrity of their origins, akin to sommeliers cherishing the provenance of fine wine. Moreover, the principles of transparency and reproducibility guided every facet of our methodology, ensuring that our journey through the realms of statistical synthesis and academic inquiry remained unwaveringly anchored in ethical prudence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9828226, r-squared of 0.9659402, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Belly of the Beast: An Examination of the Association Between Associates Degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the conferring of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches related to 'tummy ache' over a decade. Leveraging data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our analysis yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9828226 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. While one might argue that this correlation is purely coincidental, the findings prompt a closer examination of the gastro-intestinal implications of academic pursuits, and perhaps, the lingering effects of stress-induced snacking among interdisciplinary scholars. This research paves the way for a broader discussion on the subtle yet palpable impact of academic endeavors on the well-being of both aspiring scholars and the broader populace. The study also offers a gentle reminder that even the most seemingly unrelated subjects may have unexpected connections - both within academia and the realm of digestive discomfort.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The realm of academia is often characterized by its dedication to uncovering the complex, the obscure, and the unexpected. Within this context, we find ourselves drawn to the curious connection between the conferral of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. At first glance, one might be inclined to dismiss this correlation as purely coincidental. However, as with any scientific inquiry, we cannot overlook the possibility of an intriguing relationship waiting to be unveiled.
As we delve into this study, we are compelled to contemplate the gastronomic implications of academic pursuits. We are left to ponder the potential stresses and strains experienced by those venturing into the multifaceted landscape of interdisciplinary studies. Could it be that the pursuit of knowledge and the integration of varied subject matters manifest themselves in the form of gastrointestinal unease? Or perhaps, the correlation lies in the equally perplexing realm of stress-induced snacking among the scholarly elite. While these notions may elicit a chuckle, we must not overlook the potential significance of this correlation, no matter how amusing it may seem at first glance.
One cannot help but revel in the unconventional nature of this inquiry. After all, who would have thought that associates degrees and tummy aches could be entwined in such an intriguing dance of data and statistics? Our compulsion to dissect this improbable relationship serves as a testament to the boundless realms of inquiry that await us, even in the most unexpected corners of human experience. Indeed, the convergence of academia and gastrointestinal discomfort may seem like a comical coincidence. Still, this convergence serves as a gentle reminder of the intricate and often amusing interplay between seemingly unrelated variables within the tapestry of scientific exploration.
As we embark on this academic odyssey, we are reminded that even the most seemingly trivial and whimsical connections may harbor unexpected insights. It is in the spirit of curiosity, humor, and robust inquiry that we present our findings and invite fellow seekers of knowledge to join us in this peculiar yet enlightening expedition through the curious terrain of academic pursuit and digestive disquiet.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The investigation into the association between the conferring of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache' has yielded results as intriguing as they are unexpected. Our study uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9828226 between these seemingly disparate variables, with an r-squared value of 0.9659402 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021.

In Figure 1, the scatterplot portrays the strikingly linear relationship between the conferral of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of 'tummy ache' searches on Google. The sight of this graph might lead one to believe that academia's impact on gastrointestinal well-being is nothing short of a gut-wrenching revelation.

The correlation discovered is not only statistically significant but also prompts a closer examination of the gastro-intestinal implications of academic pursuits. One might jest that the pursuit of interdisciplinary knowledge has led to a collective "tummy ache" among scholars, but there may be more to this association than meets the gastrointestinal tract.

The strength of this correlation elicits a chuckle and raises eyebrows, much like a surprising punchline in the traditionally serious arena of academic research. However, the findings underscore the intricate interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains – a reminder that in the vast and often whimsical landscape of data analysis, the most unexpected relationships may reveal profound insights that tickle both the intellect and the funny bone.

The robustness of this correlation between academic pursuits and the frequency of searches for 'tummy ache' invites speculation about the potential stress-induced snacking among the interdisciplinary scholar community. Whether this leads to a newfound appreciation for the psychological impact of statistical analyses or perhaps an increased awareness of the complex relationship between stress, academia, and digestive discomfort, only time and further research will tell.

Overall, this research lays the foundation for a broader discussion on the subtle yet substantive impact of academic endeavors on the bodily well-being of both aspiring scholars and the general public. It serves as an amiable nudge to remind us that while the correlation coefficient may startle and amuse, it also offers a gentle push towards a deeper understanding of the whimsical interconnectedness of our academic pursuits and our very human experiences.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Belly of the Beast: An Examination of the Association Between Associates Degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the conferring of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches related to 'tummy ache' over a decade. Leveraging data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our analysis yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9828226 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. While one might argue that this correlation is purely coincidental, the findings prompt a closer examination of the gastro-intestinal implications of academic pursuits, and perhaps, the lingering effects of stress-induced snacking among interdisciplinary scholars. This research paves the way for a broader discussion on the subtle yet palpable impact of academic endeavors on the well-being of both aspiring scholars and the broader populace. The study also offers a gentle reminder that even the most seemingly unrelated subjects may have unexpected connections - both within academia and the realm of digestive discomfort.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the realm of academic inquiry, the peculiar and unexpected often beckon to be explored. This study of the association between the conferral of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache' embarks upon a journey that may initially appear whimsical, but holds the potential for enlightening insights.
Smith and Doe (2015) assert that interdisciplinary studies contribute to the cultivation of critical thinking and adaptability, suggesting that the pursuit of such degrees may stimulate cognitive processes extending beyond disciplinary boundaries. Jones et al. (2018) further delve into the multifaceted nature of interdisciplinary education, highlighting the cognitive flexibility and heightened problem-solving abilities that might result from navigating diverse academic realms.
However, as we venture deeper into the enigmatic relationship between academic pursuits and gastronomic expressions of unease, our exploration encounters unexpected companions. "The Interdisciplinary Mind: An Inquiry into Academic Versatility" by R. Eadrem delves into the intricacies of cognitive integration across disciplines, shedding light on the potential mental gymnastics undertaken by students of Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies. Additionally, "Mind Over Matter: Integrating Spheres of Knowledge" by K. E. Ero then beckons the reader to contemplate the mental and, by extension, gastrointestinal acrobatics intertwined with academic expansion.
As our quest for knowledge transcends traditional boundaries, we confront the unexpected intermingling of fiction and academic discourse. "The Uncharted Digestive Realms: An Epic of Gastronomic Adventure" by Y. R. Hunge leads us through a whimsical yet insightful tale exploring the perils and triumphs of gastronomic exploration, paralleling the uncharted territories of interdisciplinary academia. Furthermore, "The Digestive Chronicles: Tales of Unlikely Connections" by A. S. Earch comments on the intertwining of seemingly unrelated elements, mirroring the journey of our own inquiry.
Turning to unexpected sources for illumination, the authors have engaged with children's cartoons and shows, such as "The Stomach Saga" and "Tummy Troubles with Timmy," to gain a lighthearted but meaningful understanding of the ways in which popular culture portrays and possibly perpetuates narratives surrounding gastric discomfort. These seemingly innocuous encounters have provided valuable perspectives, demonstrating the unexpected intersections between childhood whimsy and scholarly pursuits.
As we navigate this scholarly odyssey, ever aware of the unexpected tangents that inform our journey, we are reminded of the whimsical yet profoundly enlightening pathways that entwine seemingly unrelated topics. This synthesis of academic pursuit and digestive incongruity underscores the delightful, and at times absurd, interplay between the most unexpected variables within the tapestry of scientific exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the association between the conferring of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache' has yielded results as intriguing as they are unexpected. Our study uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9828226 between these seemingly disparate variables, with an r-squared value of 0.9659402 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot portrays the strikingly linear relationship between the conferral of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of 'tummy ache' searches on Google. The sight of this graph might lead one to believe that academia's impact on gastrointestinal well-being is nothing short of a gut-wrenching revelation.
The correlation discovered is not only statistically significant but also prompts a closer examination of the gastro-intestinal implications of academic pursuits. One might jest that the pursuit of interdisciplinary knowledge has led to a collective "tummy ache" among scholars, but there may be more to this association than meets the gastrointestinal tract.
The strength of this correlation elicits a chuckle and raises eyebrows, much like a surprising punchline in the traditionally serious arena of academic research. However, the findings underscore the intricate interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains – a reminder that in the vast and often whimsical landscape of data analysis, the most unexpected relationships may reveal profound insights that tickle both the intellect and the funny bone.
The robustness of this correlation between academic pursuits and the frequency of searches for 'tummy ache' invites speculation about the potential stress-induced snacking among the interdisciplinary scholar community. Whether this leads to a newfound appreciation for the psychological impact of statistical analyses or perhaps an increased awareness of the complex relationship between stress, academia, and digestive discomfort, only time and further research will tell.
Overall, this research lays the foundation for a broader discussion on the subtle yet substantive impact of academic endeavors on the bodily well-being of both aspiring scholars and the general public. It serves as an amiable nudge to remind us that while the correlation coefficient may startle and amuse, it also offers a gentle push towards a deeper understanding of the whimsical interconnectedness of our academic pursuits and our very human experiences.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The revelation of a robust correlation between the conferral of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache' offers a delightful conundrum that showcases the palindromic relationship between academic pursuits and gastro-intestinal concerns. It is clear that the findings resonate with the charming whimsy and unexpected serendipity that often permeate the realm of scientific exploration.

In revisiting the literature on the cognitive acrobatics underlying interdisciplinary studies, we are confronted with the unexpected companions of gastronomic contemplation. The study by R. Eadrem underscored the mental gymnastics that may occur in the pursuit of multi-disciplinary knowledge, a feat perhaps not dissimilar to the navel-gazing introspections prompted by aches and grumbles in the gut. Additionally, the works of K. E. Ero lead us to contemplate the mental and gastrointestinal acrobatics intertwined with academic expansion, providing a riveting parallel to our own findings.

The amusing yet statistically robust correlation uncovered in this study aligns with prior research suggesting the cognitive flexibilities, heightened problem-solving abilities, and mental gymnastics that may be provoked by interdisciplinary education. The results might comically imply that the pursuit of multi-disciplinary knowledge induces a collective indigestion among scholars, though this association may bear more weight than meets the gut.

The linear relationship portrayed in the scatterplot prompts a whimsical yet thought-provoking reflection on the potential gastro-intestinal tribulations of the interdisciplinary scholar community. This correlation, while eliciting a chuckle, highlights the intertwined and often surprising connections between the pursuit of academic knowledge and the human experience. It emphasizes the endearing and at times amusing interconnectedness of our intellectual endeavors and the idiosyncrasies of our very human experiences.

The study invites playful speculation about the potential sources of stress-induced snacking among aspiring interdisciplinary scholars, injecting a lighthearted tone into the traditionally serious arena of academic research. This research paves the way for a broader dialogue on the subtle yet palpable impact of academic pursuits, intriguingly suggesting that the pursuit of knowledge may venture beyond intellectual exercise to influence the very functioning of the digestive system. It serves as a charming nudge to remind us that, amid the statistical analyses, the most unexpected relationships may offer both enlightening insights and the occasional good-natured chuckle.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies and Google searches for 'tummy ache'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Belly of the Beast: An Examination of the Association Between Associates Degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the curious relationship between the conferring of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches related to 'tummy ache' over a decade. Leveraging data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our analysis yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9828226 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. While one might argue that this correlation is purely coincidental, the findings prompt a closer examination of the gastro-intestinal implications of academic pursuits, and perhaps, the lingering effects of stress-induced snacking among interdisciplinary scholars. This research paves the way for a broader discussion on the subtle yet palpable impact of academic endeavors on the well-being of both aspiring scholars and the broader populace. The study also offers a gentle reminder that even the most seemingly unrelated subjects may have unexpected connections - both within academia and the realm of digestive discomfort.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The realm of academia is often characterized by its dedication to uncovering the complex, the obscure, and the unexpected. Within this context, we find ourselves drawn to the curious connection between the conferral of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. At first glance, one might be inclined to dismiss this correlation as purely coincidental. However, as with any scientific inquiry, we cannot overlook the possibility of an intriguing relationship waiting to be unveiled.
As we delve into this study, we are compelled to contemplate the gastronomic implications of academic pursuits. We are left to ponder the potential stresses and strains experienced by those venturing into the multifaceted landscape of interdisciplinary studies. Could it be that the pursuit of knowledge and the integration of varied subject matters manifest themselves in the form of gastrointestinal unease? Or perhaps, the correlation lies in the equally perplexing realm of stress-induced snacking among the scholarly elite. While these notions may elicit a chuckle, we must not overlook the potential significance of this correlation, no matter how amusing it may seem at first glance.
One cannot help but revel in the unconventional nature of this inquiry. After all, who would have thought that associates degrees and tummy aches could be entwined in such an intriguing dance of data and statistics? Our compulsion to dissect this improbable relationship serves as a testament to the boundless realms of inquiry that await us, even in the most unexpected corners of human experience. Indeed, the convergence of academia and gastrointestinal discomfort may seem like a comical coincidence. Still, this convergence serves as a gentle reminder of the intricate and often amusing interplay between seemingly unrelated variables within the tapestry of scientific exploration.
As we embark on this academic odyssey, we are reminded that even the most seemingly trivial and whimsical connections may harbor unexpected insights. It is in the spirit of curiosity, humor, and robust inquiry that we present our findings and invite fellow seekers of knowledge to join us in this peculiar yet enlightening expedition through the curious terrain of academic pursuit and digestive disquiet.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the association between the conferring of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache' has yielded results as intriguing as they are unexpected. Our study uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9828226 between these seemingly disparate variables, with an r-squared value of 0.9659402 and a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021.
In Figure 1, the scatterplot portrays the strikingly linear relationship between the conferral of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of 'tummy ache' searches on Google. The sight of this graph might lead one to believe that academia's impact on gastrointestinal well-being is nothing short of a gut-wrenching revelation.
The correlation discovered is not only statistically significant but also prompts a closer examination of the gastro-intestinal implications of academic pursuits. One might jest that the pursuit of interdisciplinary knowledge has led to a collective "tummy ache" among scholars, but there may be more to this association than meets the gastrointestinal tract.
The strength of this correlation elicits a chuckle and raises eyebrows, much like a surprising punchline in the traditionally serious arena of academic research. However, the findings underscore the intricate interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains – a reminder that in the vast and often whimsical landscape of data analysis, the most unexpected relationships may reveal profound insights that tickle both the intellect and the funny bone.
The robustness of this correlation between academic pursuits and the frequency of searches for 'tummy ache' invites speculation about the potential stress-induced snacking among the interdisciplinary scholar community. Whether this leads to a newfound appreciation for the psychological impact of statistical analyses or perhaps an increased awareness of the complex relationship between stress, academia, and digestive discomfort, only time and further research will tell.
Overall, this research lays the foundation for a broader discussion on the subtle yet substantive impact of academic endeavors on the bodily well-being of both aspiring scholars and the general public. It serves as an amiable nudge to remind us that while the correlation coefficient may startle and amuse, it also offers a gentle push towards a deeper understanding of the whimsical interconnectedness of our academic pursuits and our very human experiences.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In summary, our research has unveiled a surprising and statistically robust correlation between the conferral of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches for 'tummy ache'. While the discovery of such a strong connection may initially elicit a chuckle or two, it also invites us to ponder the potential implications and underlying mechanisms of this unexpected association.

The sight of the strikingly linear relationship depicted in the scatterplot may indeed lead one to believe that pursuing an interdisciplinary degree could be more gut-wrenching than anticipated. This correlation, with its robust statistical significance, presents a compelling case for further exploration into the gastro-intestinal implications of academic pursuits. Perhaps this will lead to a newfound appreciation for the psychological impact of statistical analyses, as well as an increased awareness of the complex relationship between stress, academia, and digestive discomfort – not to mention, the potential role of stress-induced snacking among the scholarly elite.

As we reflect on the results, it is clear that this peculiar association offers a gentle reminder of the whimsical interconnectedness of our academic pursuits and our very human experiences. Nevertheless, in the spirit of robust inquiry and with a subtle twinkle in our academic eye, we boldly declare that no further research is needed in this area. After all, in the realm of statistical oddities, this improbable correlation between Associate degrees and 'tummy ache' searches is a deliciously satisfying conclusion.

With that, we bid adieu to the curious terrain of academic pursuit and digestive disquiet, secure in the knowledge that our findings have left no stone unturned – or stomach unsettled – in this amusing yet enlightening expedition.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Belly of the Beast: An Examination of the Association Between Associates Degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Whimsical Interdisciplinary Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Belly of the Beast: An Examination of the Association Between Associates Degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Applied Navel Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Belly of the Beast: An Examination of the Association Between Associates Degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and Google Searches for 'Tummy Ache' with an abstract of This study delves into the curious relationship between the conferring of Associates degrees in Multi/Interdisciplinary Studies and the frequency of Google searches related to 'tummy ache' over a decade. Leveraging data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our analysis yielded a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9828226 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2011 to 2021. While one might argue that this correlation is purely coincidental, the findings prompt a closer examination of the gastro-intestinal implications of academic pursuits, and perhaps, the lingering effects of stress-induced snacking among interdisciplinary scholars. This research paves the way for a broader discussion on the subtle yet palpable impact of academic endeavors on the well-being of both aspiring scholars and the broader populace. The study also offers a gentle reminder that even the most seemingly unrelated subjects may have unexpected connections - both within academia and the realm of digestive discomfort.

ChatGPT:

associates degree, multi-interdisciplinary studies, interdisciplinary education, Google searches, tummy ache, correlation coefficient, National Center for Education Statistics, Google Trends, stress-induced snacking, academic stress, gastro-intestinal health, academic impact on well-being

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Associates degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies
Detailed data title: Associate's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions with a field of study of Multi/interdisciplinary studies
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associates degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies

Google searches for 'tummy ache'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'tummy ache' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'tummy ache'

Correlation r = 0.9828226 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9659402 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 96.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'tummy ache') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Associates degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.5E-8. 0.0000000651644542451575900000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 6.5E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 15,345,790 random variables You don't actually need 15 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.93, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Associates degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies (Degrees awarded)2372927263274072816729139304823078031102333903379132915
Google searches for 'tummy ache' (Rel. search volume)42.66675155.58336065.416769.083371.166777.916782.583383.583.5833




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([23729,27263,27407,28167,29139,30482,30780,31102,33390,33791,32915,])
array_2 = np.array([42.6667,51,55.5833,60,65.4167,69.0833,71.1667,77.9167,82.5833,83.5,83.5833,])
array_1_name = "Associates degrees awarded in Multi/interdisciplinary studies"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'tummy ache'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 1531 · Black Variable ID: 1246 · Red Variable ID: 1345
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0