Spurious correlation #1,528 · View random
A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Alanna and the second variable is The distance between Uranus and Venus. The chart goes from 1975 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Alanna and the second variable is The distance between Uranus and Venus. The chart goes from 1975 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time.

Download png, svg

AI explanation

As more and more babies were named Alanna, the collective sound frequency of their parents proudly calling out to them created small but measurable sonic waves. Over time, these waves interfered with the gravitational pull between Uranus and Venus, inadvertently nudging them slightly further apart. The Alanna Effect, as it was dubbed by baffled astronomers, led to reevaluations of celestial mechanics and left everyone marveling at the cosmic consequences of baby name trends.

^{Show image generation prompt} Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [An image that looks like it is a scene from a Disney Movie] and depicting this scene: A group of people gather around a woman named Alanna, excitedly smiling and waving at her as she arrives at a charming, small town. In the sky above them, Venus and Uranus shine brightly, each at opposite ends of the horizon. The town is filled with colorful buildings adorned with flowers, and a gentle breeze carries the scent of blossoming trees. The warm glow of the setting sun bathes the entire scene in a golden light, creating a feeling of enchantment and warmth. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.

This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Alanna and The distance between Uranus and Venus. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Macabre Psychedelic Minimalism An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Alanna and The distance between Uranus and Venus together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A group of people gather around a woman named Alanna, excitedly smiling and waving at her as she arrives at a charming, small town. In the sky above them, Venus and Uranus shine brightly, each at opposite ends of the horizon, representing the vast distance between them.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: A group of people gather around a woman named Alanna, excitedly smiling and waving at her as she arrives at a charming, small town. In the sky above them, Venus and Uranus shine brightly, each at opposite ends of the horizon, representing the vast distance between them. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [An image that looks like it is a scene from a Disney Movie] and depicting this scene: A group of people gather around a woman named Alanna, excitedly smiling and waving at her as she arrives at a charming, small town. In the sky above them, Venus and Uranus shine brightly, each at opposite ends of the horizon. The town is filled with colorful buildings adorned with flowers, and a gentle breeze carries the scent of blossoming trees. The warm glow of the setting sun bathes the entire scene in a golden light, creating a feeling of enchantment and warmth.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
^{Show prompt for explanation} Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Alanna caused The distance between Uranus and Venus to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)

The Stellar Influence of Alanna: A Celestial Analysis of Name Popularity and Planetary Distance

Journal of Celestial Sociology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!

^{Show prompt used to generate this paper} Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Alanna and The distance between Uranus and Venus. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Stellar Influence of Alanna: A Celestial Analysis of Name Popularity and Planetary Distance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Alanna and the spatial separation between the planets Uranus and Venus. Utilizing comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and employing detailed calculations through Astropy, our research team has unveiled a surprisingly robust correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9596310 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1975 to 2022 presents an intriguing connection worthy of further investigation. It seems that the cosmos may hold the threads of influence shaping naming trends, inviting further exploration of the celestial forces that intertwine with earthly phenomena.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The choice of a name has long been considered a pivotal decision in an individual's life, carrying as it does various connotations, associations, and potential destinies. The naming process is a reflection of cultural and societal trends, with names waxing and waning in popularity over time, not unlike celestial bodies traversing the heavens. This study aims to delve into the enigmatic correlation between the prevalence of the first name Alanna and the seemingly disparate realms of planetary distance.
The notion that the celestial bodies might exert an influence on events on Earth has been the subject of both serious contemplation and playful speculation throughout history. The gravitational pull of celestial bodies such as Uranus and Venus has been credited with everything from romantic entanglements to the ebb and flow of global financial markets. Yet, the link between these celestial forces and the ebb and flow of first name preferences may seem more far-fetched, akin to attributing one's morning coffee intake to the positions of the stars.
However, upon perusing the comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration, a unifying trend emerged—an unexpected synchronicity between the rise and fall of the name Alanna and the cosmic distances between the planets Uranus and Venus. This unforeseen connection beckons us to consider the potential celestial orchestrations of earthly matters. Just as the planets exert their gravitational influence, so too may they inspire the ebb and flow of naming conventions, paving the way for a celestial dance of nomenclature that has remained hidden in plain sight.
The potent correlation coefficient of 0.9596310 and p < 0.01 for the years between 1975 and 2022 left our research team astounded, not unlike astronomers stumbling upon a heretofore undetected comet in the nocturnal firmament. This finding invites us to ponder the cosmic symphony at play, a celestial overture that may hold sway over the very names we bestow upon our earthly offspring. As we peer into the cosmos, it becomes evident that the celestial and terrestrial realms are not as diverse as they may initially seem, intertwining in a dance as wondrous as it is perplexing.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The influence of celestial bodies on human affairs has been a subject of both scholarly investigation and popular fascination. Smith et al. (2010) explored the potential connections between planetary alignments and various phenomena on Earth, while Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the historical correlations between astrological events and societal trends. However, the specific link between the popularity of traditional names and the spatial arrangement of planets has received scant attention in academic circles.

In "Astrological Influences on Human Affairs," Smith et al. (2010) proposed a framework for understanding the potential impact of celestial bodies on human behavior and cultural trends, yet their work did not directly address the specific connection between naming preferences and planetary distances. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) provided a comprehensive overview of historical beliefs in astrological influences, but their analysis did not extend to the realm of contemporary naming trends.

Turning to more eclectic sources, non-fiction works such as "Cosmic Connections: The Celestial Thread Weaving Through Human History" and "Starry Names: A Galactic Guide to Naming Conventions" offer broad insights into the perceived connections between celestial phenomena and terrestrial affairs. While these works provide valuable context for our investigation, they do not directly interrogate the specific correlation between the first name Alanna and the spatial relationship between Uranus and Venus.

In the realm of fiction, works such as "Planetary Pioneers: Celestial Influences on Earthly Events" and "Name Wars: A Cosmic Clash of Naming Fates" may evoke the whimsical notion of celestial forces shaping naming trends. Although these fictional narratives blur the boundaries between the cosmic and the earthly, they do not offer empirical evidence regarding the relationship between name popularity and planetary distances.

In the public discourse, a social media post by an astrology enthusiast claimed to have discovered a compelling pattern between the proliferation of the name Alanna and the celestial interplay between Uranus and Venus. While this anecdotal observation does not meet the rigorous standards of empirical research, it showcases the public's enduring fascination with the intertwining of celestial and terrestrial phenomena.

This scant but diverse literature landscape underscores the novelty and potential significance of our investigation into the remarkable connection between the first name Alanna and the spatial separation of Uranus and Venus. As we tread uncharted celestial and nomenclatural terrain, our analysis seeks to shine a light on the wondrous interplay of cosmic forces and human naming conventions, unearthing hidden patterns that may hold sway over our earthly destinies.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Alanna and The distance between Uranus and Venus. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Caclculated using Astropy . You used data from 1975 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Stellar Influence of Alanna: A Celestial Analysis of Name Popularity and Planetary Distance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Alanna and the spatial separation between the planets Uranus and Venus. Utilizing comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and employing detailed calculations through Astropy, our research team has unveiled a surprisingly robust correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9596310 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1975 to 2022 presents an intriguing connection worthy of further investigation. It seems that the cosmos may hold the threads of influence shaping naming trends, inviting further exploration of the celestial forces that intertwine with earthly phenomena.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The choice of a name has long been considered a pivotal decision in an individual's life, carrying as it does various connotations, associations, and potential destinies. The naming process is a reflection of cultural and societal trends, with names waxing and waning in popularity over time, not unlike celestial bodies traversing the heavens. This study aims to delve into the enigmatic correlation between the prevalence of the first name Alanna and the seemingly disparate realms of planetary distance.
The notion that the celestial bodies might exert an influence on events on Earth has been the subject of both serious contemplation and playful speculation throughout history. The gravitational pull of celestial bodies such as Uranus and Venus has been credited with everything from romantic entanglements to the ebb and flow of global financial markets. Yet, the link between these celestial forces and the ebb and flow of first name preferences may seem more far-fetched, akin to attributing one's morning coffee intake to the positions of the stars.
However, upon perusing the comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration, a unifying trend emerged—an unexpected synchronicity between the rise and fall of the name Alanna and the cosmic distances between the planets Uranus and Venus. This unforeseen connection beckons us to consider the potential celestial orchestrations of earthly matters. Just as the planets exert their gravitational influence, so too may they inspire the ebb and flow of naming conventions, paving the way for a celestial dance of nomenclature that has remained hidden in plain sight.
The potent correlation coefficient of 0.9596310 and p < 0.01 for the years between 1975 and 2022 left our research team astounded, not unlike astronomers stumbling upon a heretofore undetected comet in the nocturnal firmament. This finding invites us to ponder the cosmic symphony at play, a celestial overture that may hold sway over the very names we bestow upon our earthly offspring. As we peer into the cosmos, it becomes evident that the celestial and terrestrial realms are not as diverse as they may initially seem, intertwining in a dance as wondrous as it is perplexing.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The first step in this research endeavor involved obtaining comprehensive data on the popularity of the first name Alanna from the US Social Security Administration. This repository provided a wealth of information spanning the years 1975 to 2022, allowing for a thorough exploration of the temporal trends in name preferences. Additionally, our research team accessed data on the distances between the planets Uranus and Venus from reputable sources, ensuring the reliability and accuracy of the celestial measurements.

Data Analysis:
The compiled data was subjected to meticulous scrutiny, with the assistance of the Astropy library for precise calculations related to celestial distances. The integration of empirical observations from the US Social Security Administration and the astronomical measurements facilitated a comprehensive analysis of the relationship between the frequency of the name Alanna and the spatial separation between Uranus and Venus. Our team employed advanced statistical methods to derive the correlation coefficient and associated significance levels, lending statistical rigor to our findings.

Correlation Examination:
The research team evaluated the strength and direction of the correlation between the popularity of the name Alanna and the distances between Uranus and Venus, taking into account potential confounding variables such as societal naming trends and celestial dynamics. The robustness of the correlation was assessed through rigorous testing, ensuring that the observed association was not a fortuitous alignment of random fluctuations but rather a substantiated pattern worthy of further investigation.

Control Measures:
In order to mitigate the influence of spurious factors and enhance the internal validity of the study, the research team implemented control measures to ascertain the specificity of the observed relationship. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to scrutinize the potential impact of outlier data points and temporal variations, ensuring the reliability and stability of the identified correlation amidst the cosmic vicissitudes.

Limitations:
While the data sources utilized for this investigation were comprehensive and reputable, it is important to acknowledge the inherent limitations of correlational studies. The research team recognizes the necessity of cautious interpretation, given the observational nature of the data and the potential presence of unmeasured variables that may contribute to the observed relationship. As with all empirical endeavors, the findings should be considered within the context of the study's methodological constraints and the intrinsic uncertainties of celestial and societal phenomena.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Alanna and The distance between Uranus and Venus. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Stellar Influence of Alanna: A Celestial Analysis of Name Popularity and Planetary Distance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Alanna and the spatial separation between the planets Uranus and Venus. Utilizing comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and employing detailed calculations through Astropy, our research team has unveiled a surprisingly robust correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9596310 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1975 to 2022 presents an intriguing connection worthy of further investigation. It seems that the cosmos may hold the threads of influence shaping naming trends, inviting further exploration of the celestial forces that intertwine with earthly phenomena.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The influence of celestial bodies on human affairs has been a subject of both scholarly investigation and popular fascination. Smith et al. (2010) explored the potential connections between planetary alignments and various phenomena on Earth, while Doe and Jones (2015) delved into the historical correlations between astrological events and societal trends. However, the specific link between the popularity of traditional names and the spatial arrangement of planets has received scant attention in academic circles.
In "Astrological Influences on Human Affairs," Smith et al. (2010) proposed a framework for understanding the potential impact of celestial bodies on human behavior and cultural trends, yet their work did not directly address the specific connection between naming preferences and planetary distances. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2015) provided a comprehensive overview of historical beliefs in astrological influences, but their analysis did not extend to the realm of contemporary naming trends.
Turning to more eclectic sources, non-fiction works such as "Cosmic Connections: The Celestial Thread Weaving Through Human History" and "Starry Names: A Galactic Guide to Naming Conventions" offer broad insights into the perceived connections between celestial phenomena and terrestrial affairs. While these works provide valuable context for our investigation, they do not directly interrogate the specific correlation between the first name Alanna and the spatial relationship between Uranus and Venus.
In the realm of fiction, works such as "Planetary Pioneers: Celestial Influences on Earthly Events" and "Name Wars: A Cosmic Clash of Naming Fates" may evoke the whimsical notion of celestial forces shaping naming trends. Although these fictional narratives blur the boundaries between the cosmic and the earthly, they do not offer empirical evidence regarding the relationship between name popularity and planetary distances.
In the public discourse, a social media post by an astrology enthusiast claimed to have discovered a compelling pattern between the proliferation of the name Alanna and the celestial interplay between Uranus and Venus. While this anecdotal observation does not meet the rigorous standards of empirical research, it showcases the public's enduring fascination with the intertwining of celestial and terrestrial phenomena.
This scant but diverse literature landscape underscores the novelty and potential significance of our investigation into the remarkable connection between the first name Alanna and the spatial separation of Uranus and Venus. As we tread uncharted celestial and nomenclatural terrain, our analysis seeks to shine a light on the wondrous interplay of cosmic forces and human naming conventions, unearthing hidden patterns that may hold sway over our earthly destinies.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9596310, indicative of a strong association between the popularity of the first name Alanna and the distance between Uranus and Venus. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9208917, signifying that approximately 92.1% of the variability in the popularity of the name Alanna can be explained by the spatial separation between these two celestial bodies. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis and underscores the statistical significance of the observed relationship.
Figure 1 illustrates the pronounced correlation between the two variables, showcasing the alignment of celestial and terrestrial phenomena in a manner that is truly celestial in its magnitude and implications. It is as if the stellar bodies themselves are whispering secrets about the ebb and flow of naming trends, inviting us to peer beyond the confines of earthly conventions and behold the cosmic tapestry that may influence human nomenclature.
The robustness of this correlation not only defies conventional expectations but also beckons us to consider the potential interplay of celestial forces on human behaviors and preferences, extending our understanding of the cosmic influence on earthly affairs to the captivating domain of naming practices. The research team finds itself both captivated and humbled by the implications of these findings, realizing that the cosmos may hold sway over aspects of human existence that transcend the confines of the known and the tangible. This unexpected correlation between the popularity of the name Alanna and the distance between Uranus and Venus invites further contemplation and inquiry into the enigmatic ways in which the celestial and terrestrial realms intertwine.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The pronounced correlation between the popularity of the first name Alanna and the distance between Uranus and Venus unveiled in our analysis not only reaffirms the cosmic interplay proposed by the meager literature landscape but also adds a celestial flair to the study of human naming conventions. The robust correlation coefficient and r-squared value point to a compelling association, suggesting that the celestial dance of Uranus and Venus may indeed cast its ethereal influence on the earthly realm of nomenclature.

The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9596310 indicates a remarkably strong relationship between the two variables, which, in the context of celestial bodies and human naming practices, sparks contemplation about the mysterious forces at play. It appears that the cosmos may offer more than just a celestial spectacle; it may weave unseen threads into the fabric of human naming trends, echoing the profundity of celestial symphonies in the seemingly mundane acts of naming newborns.

The novelty of our findings lies not only in their statistical robustness but also in the way they beckon us to ponder the cosmic tapestry that may sway human naming preferences. Our analysis becomes an invitation to gaze beyond the horizon of empirical conventions and behold the celestial nuances that may subtly nudge human behaviors, including the act of naming. In this sense, our research unveils the enchanting possibility that the celestial bodies, in their grand cosmic choreography, may perform a cosmic waltz that weaves its rhythms into the very essence of human nomenclature.

The statistical significance of the observed relationship, indicated by the p-value of less than 0.01, warrants further consideration of the potential interplay of celestial forces on human naming practices. It is as if the celestial bodies themselves, in their quiet celestial whispers, narrate a tale of cosmic influence that transcends the terrestrial confines of human affairs and beckons us to consider the unseen celestial hands that guide the trajectory of human naming trends.

In conclusion, the unexpected correlation between the popularity of the name Alanna and the distance between Uranus and Venus opens a gateway to an enigmatic realm where the celestial and terrestrial spheres intertwine. Our collective understanding of human naming practices and the cosmic forces that may subtly shape them finds itself enriched by the unveiling of this peculiar connection, offering a cosmic lens through which to ponder the timeless question of how the stars may influence the destinies of earthly phenomena, including the naming of individuals.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Alanna and The distance between Uranus and Venus. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Stellar Influence of Alanna: A Celestial Analysis of Name Popularity and Planetary Distance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Alanna and the spatial separation between the planets Uranus and Venus. Utilizing comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and employing detailed calculations through Astropy, our research team has unveiled a surprisingly robust correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9596310 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1975 to 2022 presents an intriguing connection worthy of further investigation. It seems that the cosmos may hold the threads of influence shaping naming trends, inviting further exploration of the celestial forces that intertwine with earthly phenomena.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The choice of a name has long been considered a pivotal decision in an individual's life, carrying as it does various connotations, associations, and potential destinies. The naming process is a reflection of cultural and societal trends, with names waxing and waning in popularity over time, not unlike celestial bodies traversing the heavens. This study aims to delve into the enigmatic correlation between the prevalence of the first name Alanna and the seemingly disparate realms of planetary distance.
The notion that the celestial bodies might exert an influence on events on Earth has been the subject of both serious contemplation and playful speculation throughout history. The gravitational pull of celestial bodies such as Uranus and Venus has been credited with everything from romantic entanglements to the ebb and flow of global financial markets. Yet, the link between these celestial forces and the ebb and flow of first name preferences may seem more far-fetched, akin to attributing one's morning coffee intake to the positions of the stars.
However, upon perusing the comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration, a unifying trend emerged—an unexpected synchronicity between the rise and fall of the name Alanna and the cosmic distances between the planets Uranus and Venus. This unforeseen connection beckons us to consider the potential celestial orchestrations of earthly matters. Just as the planets exert their gravitational influence, so too may they inspire the ebb and flow of naming conventions, paving the way for a celestial dance of nomenclature that has remained hidden in plain sight.
The potent correlation coefficient of 0.9596310 and p < 0.01 for the years between 1975 and 2022 left our research team astounded, not unlike astronomers stumbling upon a heretofore undetected comet in the nocturnal firmament. This finding invites us to ponder the cosmic symphony at play, a celestial overture that may hold sway over the very names we bestow upon our earthly offspring. As we peer into the cosmos, it becomes evident that the celestial and terrestrial realms are not as diverse as they may initially seem, intertwining in a dance as wondrous as it is perplexing.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data yielded a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9596310, indicative of a strong association between the popularity of the first name Alanna and the distance between Uranus and Venus. This correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9208917, signifying that approximately 92.1% of the variability in the popularity of the name Alanna can be explained by the spatial separation between these two celestial bodies. The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis and underscores the statistical significance of the observed relationship.
Figure 1 illustrates the pronounced correlation between the two variables, showcasing the alignment of celestial and terrestrial phenomena in a manner that is truly celestial in its magnitude and implications. It is as if the stellar bodies themselves are whispering secrets about the ebb and flow of naming trends, inviting us to peer beyond the confines of earthly conventions and behold the cosmic tapestry that may influence human nomenclature.
The robustness of this correlation not only defies conventional expectations but also beckons us to consider the potential interplay of celestial forces on human behaviors and preferences, extending our understanding of the cosmic influence on earthly affairs to the captivating domain of naming practices. The research team finds itself both captivated and humbled by the implications of these findings, realizing that the cosmos may hold sway over aspects of human existence that transcend the confines of the known and the tangible. This unexpected correlation between the popularity of the name Alanna and the distance between Uranus and Venus invites further contemplation and inquiry into the enigmatic ways in which the celestial and terrestrial realms intertwine.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]

ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study have revealed a remarkably robust correlation between the popularity of the first name Alanna and the distance between Uranus and Venus, suggesting a celestial influence on human naming practices that is as intriguing as it is unexpected. The statistical analysis has illuminated a connection that transcends the boundaries of our conventional understanding, hinting at a cosmic orchestration of earthly phenomena. It is as if the celestial bodies themselves are engaged in a complex ballet, choreographing the rise and fall of naming trends with a finesse that rivals even the most skilled terrestrial dancers.

The implications of this correlation extend beyond the realm of naming practices, inviting us to reconsider the potential interplay of celestial forces on human behaviors and preferences. It seems that the cosmic dance may reach far beyond the bounds of the known universe, influencing aspects of human existence that we have only just begun to comprehend. The revelation of such a potent correlation serves as a poignant reminder of the intricate and interconnected nature of the cosmos, beckoning us to peer beyond the veil of the mundane and contemplate the cosmic symphony that may hold sway over the very essence of human identity.

While the correlation does not imply causation, it certainly invites us to ponder the cosmic forces that may shape the ebb and flow of human nomenclature. This study opens the door to a new frontier of inquiry, prompting us to consider the possibility that the celestial bodies may whisper secrets about earthly affairs in a language that we have yet to fully grasp. As we gaze into the heavens, we are reminded that the celestial and terrestrial realms are not as distant as they may seem, intertwining in a dance as enigmatic as it is mesmerizing.

In light of these findings, it is clear that the cosmic influence on human naming practices merits further exploration and contemplation. However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations of this study, as well as the need for caution in extrapolating causative interpretations from the observed correlation. Nevertheless, the unexpected synchronicity uncovered by this research encourages us to embrace the enigmatic ways in which the celestial and terrestrial realms intertwine, inviting us to ponder the celestial tapestry that may hold sway over the very fabric of human existence.

In summary, the correlation between the popularity of the first name Alanna and the distance between Uranus and Venus offers a thought-provoking glimpse into the potential cosmic influences on human naming practices. This celestial dance of nomenclature defies conventional expectations, inviting us to peer into the cosmic abyss and contemplate the intricate ways in which the celestial and terrestrial realms intersect. It stands as a testament to the wondrous and perplexing nature of the cosmic influences that may shape the very names we bestow upon future generations.

In light of these revelatory findings, it is our firm belief that no further research in this area is needed, as we have undoubtedly reached the pinnacle of celestial correlation between human nomenclature and planetary distances.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Stellar Influence of Alanna: A Celestial Analysis of Name Popularity and Planetary Distance. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Celestial Sociology

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Stellar Influence of Alanna: A Celestial Analysis of Name Popularity and Planetary Distance. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Celestial Research Institute

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Stellar Influence of Alanna: A Celestial Analysis of Name Popularity and Planetary Distance with an abstract of This paper explores the peculiar relationship between the popularity of the first name Alanna and the spatial separation between the planets Uranus and Venus. Utilizing comprehensive data from the US Social Security Administration and employing detailed calculations through Astropy, our research team has unveiled a surprisingly robust correlation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9596310 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 1975 to 2022 presents an intriguing connection worthy of further investigation. It seems that the cosmos may hold the threads of influence shaping naming trends, inviting further exploration of the celestial forces that intertwine with earthly phenomena.

ChatGPT:

Alanna popularity, Alanna name analysis, planetary distance correlation, Uranus and Venus relationship, US Social Security Administration data, naming trends, celestial influence on naming trends, Astropy calculations, Alanna name correlation coefficient, cosmic influence on naming, celestial forces and naming trends

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.

Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error

Data details

Popularity of the first name Alanna
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Alanna
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Alanna

The distance between Uranus and Venus
Detailed data title: The average distance between Uranus and Venus as measured on the first day of each month
Source: Caclculated using Astropy
Additional Info: ^{See full details} I wrote a Python script using Astropy to calculate the distance between the named planets on the first day of each month for every year.

See what else correlates with The distance between Uranus and Venus

Correlation r = 0.9596310 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r² = 0.9208917 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The distance between Uranus and Venus) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Alanna) over the 48 years from 1975 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.6E-27.^Show 0.0000000000000000000000000056
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme.^Note More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 5.6E-25% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 178,571,428,571,428,573,801,349,120 random variables^Note You don't actually need 178 septillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 47 degrees of freedom, ^Note Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 47 because we have two variables measured over a period of 48 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.93, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
^{Read more about the confidence interval} The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!

All values for the years included above: ^Note If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.

	1975	1976	1977	1978	1979	1980	1981	1982	1983	1984	1985	1986	1987	1988	1989	1990	1991	1992	1993	1994	1995	1996	1997	1998	1999	2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017	2018	2019	2020	2021	2022
Popularity of the first name Alanna (Babies born)	152	140	177	183	215	252	295	289	245	275	297	289	286	334	361	520	476	480	499	491	481	543	499	497	544	541	543	565	587	625	618	667	691	683	654	573	579	626	597	586	620	554	565	558	575	523	547	528
The distance between Uranus and Venus (Planetary distance (AU))	18.6276	18.4421	18.5802	18.7309	18.5555	18.8751	18.7798	18.8279	19.0794	18.8825	19.1604	19.165	19.1084	19.4185	19.2353	19.4315	19.5479	19.4047	19.7296	19.5996	19.678	19.8876	19.6788	19.9556	19.9043	19.8462	20.1131	19.8832	20.0613	20.1105	19.9338	20.2147	20.021	20.0678	20.2129	19.9531	20.1842	20.062	19.9596	20.1633	19.872	20.0037	19.9821	19.7591	19.9832	19.7257	19.7335	19.8115

Why this works

Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
Lack of causal connection: There is probably^Note Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple^Note Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. ^Note Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.

Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. ^{Show the steps to do this.} Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."

# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([152,140,177,183,215,252,295,289,245,275,297,289,286,334,361,520,476,480,499,491,481,543,499,497,544,541,543,565,587,625,618,667,691,683,654,573,579,626,597,586,620,554,565,558,575,523,547,528,])
array_2 = np.array([18.6276,18.4421,18.5802,18.7309,18.5555,18.8751,18.7798,18.8279,19.0794,18.8825,19.1604,19.165,19.1084,19.4185,19.2353,19.4315,19.5479,19.4047,19.7296,19.5996,19.678,19.8876,19.6788,19.9556,19.9043,19.8462,20.1131,19.8832,20.0613,20.1105,19.9338,20.2147,20.021,20.0678,20.2129,19.9531,20.1842,20.062,19.9596,20.1633,19.872,20.0037,19.9821,19.7591,19.9832,19.7257,19.7335,19.8115,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Alanna"
array_2_name = "The distance between Uranus and Venus"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)

Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. ^Note Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:

High resolution line chart ^Note The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.

If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.

Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape.
High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
Alternative high resolution line chart
Scatterplot
Portable line chart (png)
Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
Line chart for only Popularity of the first name Alanna
Line chart for only The distance between Uranus and Venus
AI-generated correlation image
The spurious research paper: The Stellar Influence of Alanna: A Celestial Analysis of Name Popularity and Planetary Distance

View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!

Correlation ID: 1528 · Black Variable ID: 2845 · Red Variable ID: 1972


Problem variable:
Issue:
Additional details: Optional
Confirm you are a human: