Report an error
Popularity of the first name Alanna correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The distance between Uranus and the moon | r=0.97 | 48yrs | No |
The distance between Uranus and Venus | r=0.96 | 48yrs | Yes! |
Electricity generation in Greece | r=0.95 | 42yrs | No |
Number of Las Vegas Hotel Room Check-Ins | r=0.94 | 39yrs | No |
Biomass power generated in United States | r=0.93 | 42yrs | Yes! |
Nuclear power generation in Spain | r=0.81 | 42yrs | No |
Air quality in Denver, Colorado | r=0.79 | 43yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.67 | 46yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Alanna also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)