about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,503 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Georgia and the second variable is Google searches for 'desktop background'.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the GMO cotton crops dwindled, so did the digital options for aesthetic enhancement - it's like the whole industry was felted up in a maze of pixelated confusion!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: "Generate an image inspired by a Discovery magazine cover, showcasing a vibrant field of lush green cotton plants in Georgia. In the foreground, depict workers tending to the crops with a sense of purpose and activity. In the background, visualize a group of people gathered around a computer, engrossed in searching for 'desktop background' on Google, with a curious and intrigued expression on their faces. Let the scene exude a sense of exploration, innovation, and harmony with nature." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy graphics Macabre Futuristic Cutsy art illustration A Discovery magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'desktop background' together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A field of lush green cotton plants in Georgia, with workers tending to the crops. In the background, a group of people gathered around a computer, searching for "desktop background" on Google.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: A field of lush green cotton plants in Georgia, with workers tending to the crops. In the background, a group of people gathered around a computer, searching for "desktop background" on Google. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: "Generate an image inspired by a Discovery magazine cover, showcasing a vibrant field of lush green cotton plants in Georgia. In the foreground, depict workers tending to the crops with a sense of purpose and activity. In the background, visualize a group of people gathered around a computer, engrossed in searching for 'desktop background' on Google, with a curious and intrigued expression on their faces. Let the scene exude a sense of exploration, innovation, and harmony with nature."

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in cotton in Georgia caused desktop background (Google searches for 'desktop background') to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Sowing Seeds of Curiosity: Exploring the Link Between GMO Cotton in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'

The Journal of Agricultural Technology and Internet Usage

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9041997 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Sowing Seeds of Curiosity: Exploring the Link Between GMO Cotton in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing correlation that may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a genetically modified haystack. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, we set out to investigate the potential relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in the state of Georgia and the behavior of internet users searching for 'desktop background'. The findings of our research unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9041997, with a significance level of p < 0.01, spanning from 2007 to 2022. Our analysis sheds light on the surprising connection between agricultural biotechnology and virtual aesthetic preferences, raising questions that may sprout further inquiries into the intersecting realms of crop cultivation and digital diversions. While the significance of such a correlation may seem as baffling as a disappearing crop circle, the implications of this serendipitous discovery prompt a harvest of new avenues for interdisciplinary investigation. We harvest the fruits of our study, yielding a playful yet thought-provoking perspective on the interconnectedness of agrarian innovation and cyber curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Sowing Seeds of Curiosity: Exploring the Link Between GMO Cotton in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing correlation that may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a genetically modified haystack. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, we set out to investigate the potential relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in the state of Georgia and the behavior of internet users searching for 'desktop background'. The findings of our research unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9041997, with a significance level of p < 0.01, spanning from 2007 to 2022. Our analysis sheds light on the surprising connection between agricultural biotechnology and virtual aesthetic preferences, raising questions that may sprout further inquiries into the intersecting realms of crop cultivation and digital diversions. While the significance of such a correlation may seem as baffling as a disappearing crop circle, the implications of this serendipitous discovery prompt a harvest of new avenues for interdisciplinary investigation. We harvest the fruits of our study, yielding a playful yet thought-provoking perspective on the interconnectedness of agrarian innovation and cyber curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The advent of genetically modified organism (GMO) crops has undeniably sparked widespread debates, with proponents touting its potential to address food security challenges and improve crop resilience, while skeptics raise concerns about ecological impacts and market monopolization. Amidst this polarized discourse, our study takes a peculiar turn down the cotton fields of Georgia, where we inadvertently stumbled upon a tangential correlation that seems as improbable as finding a needle in a biotechnologically enhanced haystack.

While conventional wisdom steers the discourse towards the agricultural and economic implications of GMO cotton adoption in Georgia, a whim of curiosity led us to explore the uncharted territory of internet search behavior. Specifically, our investigation delves into the enigmatic connection between the proliferation of GMO cotton and the peculiar penchant for internet users to seek out the perfect 'desktop background'.

It is important to soil our discussion with the acknowledgment that this exploration sprouts from a lighthearted inclination to weave a narrative between disparate domains, in the hopes of infusing a hint of levity into the often arid expanse of scholarly research. However, much like a genetically engineered plant, what appears whimsical or improbable at first glance may harbor elements of unsuspected insight that warrant diligent examination.

As we embark on this eccentric expedition, let us cultivate an open mind and an appreciation for the absurdity that often permeates the pursuit of knowledge. Thus, we invite you to join our journey into the tangled intertwining of agrarian innovation and cyber curiosities, for who knows what fruitful yield of knowledge may sprout from this seemingly whimsical juxtaposition. After all, as seasoned researchers, we recognize that sometimes the most serendipitous discoveries are, quite literally, right under our noses – or should we say, roots?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Sowing Seeds of Curiosity: Exploring the Link Between GMO Cotton in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing correlation that may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a genetically modified haystack. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, we set out to investigate the potential relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in the state of Georgia and the behavior of internet users searching for 'desktop background'. The findings of our research unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9041997, with a significance level of p < 0.01, spanning from 2007 to 2022. Our analysis sheds light on the surprising connection between agricultural biotechnology and virtual aesthetic preferences, raising questions that may sprout further inquiries into the intersecting realms of crop cultivation and digital diversions. While the significance of such a correlation may seem as baffling as a disappearing crop circle, the implications of this serendipitous discovery prompt a harvest of new avenues for interdisciplinary investigation. We harvest the fruits of our study, yielding a playful yet thought-provoking perspective on the interconnectedness of agrarian innovation and cyber curiosity.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The advent of genetically modified organism (GMO) crops has undeniably sparked widespread debates, with proponents touting its potential to address food security challenges and improve crop resilience, while skeptics raise concerns about ecological impacts and market monopolization. Amidst this polarized discourse, our study takes a peculiar turn down the cotton fields of Georgia, where we inadvertently stumbled upon a tangential correlation that seems as improbable as finding a needle in a biotechnologically enhanced haystack.
While conventional wisdom steers the discourse towards the agricultural and economic implications of GMO cotton adoption in Georgia, a whim of curiosity led us to explore the uncharted territory of internet search behavior. Specifically, our investigation delves into the enigmatic connection between the proliferation of GMO cotton and the peculiar penchant for internet users to seek out the perfect 'desktop background'.
It is important to soil our discussion with the acknowledgment that this exploration sprouts from a lighthearted inclination to weave a narrative between disparate domains, in the hopes of infusing a hint of levity into the often arid expanse of scholarly research. However, much like a genetically engineered plant, what appears whimsical or improbable at first glance may harbor elements of unsuspected insight that warrant diligent examination.
As we embark on this eccentric expedition, let us cultivate an open mind and an appreciation for the absurdity that often permeates the pursuit of knowledge. Thus, we invite you to join our journey into the tangled intertwining of agrarian innovation and cyber curiosities, for who knows what fruitful yield of knowledge may sprout from this seemingly whimsical juxtaposition. After all, as seasoned researchers, we recognize that sometimes the most serendipitous discoveries are, quite literally, right under our noses – or should we say, roots?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The exploration of seemingly unrelated phenomena has been a hallmark of scientific inquiry, often leading to serendipitous discoveries with profound implications. In "The Hidden Connections," Smith delves into the interconnectedness of disparate systems, highlighting the unsuspected links that underlie seemingly unrelated elements. This notion forms the crux of our investigation into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Georgia and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background'.

As we plow through the literature on GMO cotton, the works of Doe and Jones in "Agricultural Biotechnology and Its Impacts" provide a comprehensive view of the adoption and implications of GMO crops, primarily focusing on yield improvements and pest resistance. However, what they may not have anticipated is the potential impact of GMO cotton on the internet habits of virtual aesthetes. In a twist that rivals a crop rotation, our findings have uncovered a surprising alignment between the cultivation of biotechnologically modified cotton and the virtual quest for the perfect background for computer screens.

Shifting gears, the socio-economic dimensions of technology adoption and its impact on consumer behavior are examined in "The Long Tail" by Chris Anderson. Although Anderson's work primarily explores the digital marketplace, the concept of niche interests and the exploration of varied preferences resonates with our unearthing of an unexpected niche - the correlation between a specific agricultural practice and an unconventional online search behavior. Like a hybrid strain with unanticipated attributes, our study unveils a serendipitous hybridization of agricultural innovation and digital diversions, akin to stumbling upon an elusive genetic mutation in an ecosystem.

In the realm of fiction, the parallel development of complex, intertwined narratives bears semblance to the improbable link we have unearthed. In "The Cotton Patch" by Wallace, the interplay of characters and unforeseen connections mirrors the impromptu union of GMO cotton and digital questing that has emerged from our study. Similarly, the enigmatic search for truth and meaning in "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" by Haddon reflects the perplexing investigation that led to our unexpected revelation.

Embarking on a more contemporary avenue, social media exchanges have yielded threads of relevance to our peculiar discovery. In a Reddit post by user_GMOEnthusiast, an offhand remark about the proliferation of genetically modified cotton in Georgia sparked a lighthearted debate on the influence of agricultural practices on virtual desktop customization. This anecdotal exchange mirrors the conversational resonance of our study's unexpected juxtaposition, serving as a testament to the unanticipated connections that emerge in the digital agora.

As we delve into this inexplicably interconnected tapestry, our contributions meld the empirical with the absurd, the scholarly with the whimsical, yielding a harvest of insights that challenges traditional boundaries of inquiry. It is with equal parts incredulity and amusement that we present our findings, reaping the fruits of an investigation that has transgressed the conventional confines of scholarly exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2007 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Sowing Seeds of Curiosity: Exploring the Link Between GMO Cotton in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing correlation that may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a genetically modified haystack. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, we set out to investigate the potential relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in the state of Georgia and the behavior of internet users searching for 'desktop background'. The findings of our research unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9041997, with a significance level of p < 0.01, spanning from 2007 to 2022. Our analysis sheds light on the surprising connection between agricultural biotechnology and virtual aesthetic preferences, raising questions that may sprout further inquiries into the intersecting realms of crop cultivation and digital diversions. While the significance of such a correlation may seem as baffling as a disappearing crop circle, the implications of this serendipitous discovery prompt a harvest of new avenues for interdisciplinary investigation. We harvest the fruits of our study, yielding a playful yet thought-provoking perspective on the interconnectedness of agrarian innovation and cyber curiosity.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The advent of genetically modified organism (GMO) crops has undeniably sparked widespread debates, with proponents touting its potential to address food security challenges and improve crop resilience, while skeptics raise concerns about ecological impacts and market monopolization. Amidst this polarized discourse, our study takes a peculiar turn down the cotton fields of Georgia, where we inadvertently stumbled upon a tangential correlation that seems as improbable as finding a needle in a biotechnologically enhanced haystack.
While conventional wisdom steers the discourse towards the agricultural and economic implications of GMO cotton adoption in Georgia, a whim of curiosity led us to explore the uncharted territory of internet search behavior. Specifically, our investigation delves into the enigmatic connection between the proliferation of GMO cotton and the peculiar penchant for internet users to seek out the perfect 'desktop background'.
It is important to soil our discussion with the acknowledgment that this exploration sprouts from a lighthearted inclination to weave a narrative between disparate domains, in the hopes of infusing a hint of levity into the often arid expanse of scholarly research. However, much like a genetically engineered plant, what appears whimsical or improbable at first glance may harbor elements of unsuspected insight that warrant diligent examination.
As we embark on this eccentric expedition, let us cultivate an open mind and an appreciation for the absurdity that often permeates the pursuit of knowledge. Thus, we invite you to join our journey into the tangled intertwining of agrarian innovation and cyber curiosities, for who knows what fruitful yield of knowledge may sprout from this seemingly whimsical juxtaposition. After all, as seasoned researchers, we recognize that sometimes the most serendipitous discoveries are, quite literally, right under our noses – or should we say, roots?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
To plow through the fertile fields of data, we employed a combination of traditional and digital harvesting methods. Our research team cultivated a comprehensive dataset spanning from 2007 to 2022, utilizing information primarily sourced from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Georgia. The USDA data served as the bedrock of our agricultural inquiry, providing a robust foundation for understanding the prevalence and distribution of GMO cotton cultivation within the state. As for our exploration of cyber curiosities, our digital seedlings took root in the domain of Google searches. We leveraged Google Trends to unearth the ebbs and flows of searches for 'desktop background' within the same temporal span, exploring the ever-shifting landscape of virtual aesthetic questing.

Quantitative Analysis:
To till the soil of statistical inquiry, we employed a plow of quantitative analyses to elucidate the correlation between the adoption of GMO cotton and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Employing an array of statistical tools akin to a formidable agricultural arsenal, we computed correlation coefficients and p-values to measure the robustness of the observed relationship. Using the time series data gleaned from the USDA and Google Trends, we conducted a thorough analysis to unearth the unseen connections between rural biotechnology and virtual visual whimsy.

Control Variables:
Just as a diligent gardener tends to various factors influencing crop growth, we carefully considered potential confounding variables that could influence our findings. Factors such as technological advancements, internet penetration, and shifts in consumer preferences were meticulously pruned to ensure that our analysis did not inadvertently harvest spurious relationships.

Model Specification:
To plant the seeds of rigorous analysis, we employed a model that accounted for potential temporal dynamics and non-linear patterns in the data. By adopting a sophisticated econometric framework that harnessed the power of time series analysis, we endeavored to weed out any spurious relationships and promote a crop of robust findings.

Sensitivity Analysis:
In a bid to cultivate confidence in our findings, we conducted a sensitivity analysis akin to inspecting the vulnerabilities of a genetically modified crop. This entailed perturbing our statistical models and data assumptions to assess the stability of our results under varying conditions, reflecting the unforeseen gusts of uncertainty that often pervade empirical inquiries.

Ethical Considerations:
In the spirit of responsible research cultivation, our study adheres to the ethical guidelines prescribed by the academic community. We recognize the importance of transparency and integrity in the dissemination of our findings, ensuring that our research practices uphold the principles of scientific rigor and scholarly probity.

By employing this multidimensional approach, the seeds of our methodology blossom into a rich tapestry of interdisciplinary inquiry, sowing the grounds for a spirited exploration of the unanticipated ties between the agrarian and the virtual, and provoking laughter as heartily as the amusing mishap of a cow grazing on a "cover crop."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2007 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9041997, r-squared of 0.8175771, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Sowing Seeds of Curiosity: Exploring the Link Between GMO Cotton in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing correlation that may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a genetically modified haystack. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, we set out to investigate the potential relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in the state of Georgia and the behavior of internet users searching for 'desktop background'. The findings of our research unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9041997, with a significance level of p < 0.01, spanning from 2007 to 2022. Our analysis sheds light on the surprising connection between agricultural biotechnology and virtual aesthetic preferences, raising questions that may sprout further inquiries into the intersecting realms of crop cultivation and digital diversions. While the significance of such a correlation may seem as baffling as a disappearing crop circle, the implications of this serendipitous discovery prompt a harvest of new avenues for interdisciplinary investigation. We harvest the fruits of our study, yielding a playful yet thought-provoking perspective on the interconnectedness of agrarian innovation and cyber curiosity.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The advent of genetically modified organism (GMO) crops has undeniably sparked widespread debates, with proponents touting its potential to address food security challenges and improve crop resilience, while skeptics raise concerns about ecological impacts and market monopolization. Amidst this polarized discourse, our study takes a peculiar turn down the cotton fields of Georgia, where we inadvertently stumbled upon a tangential correlation that seems as improbable as finding a needle in a biotechnologically enhanced haystack.
While conventional wisdom steers the discourse towards the agricultural and economic implications of GMO cotton adoption in Georgia, a whim of curiosity led us to explore the uncharted territory of internet search behavior. Specifically, our investigation delves into the enigmatic connection between the proliferation of GMO cotton and the peculiar penchant for internet users to seek out the perfect 'desktop background'.
It is important to soil our discussion with the acknowledgment that this exploration sprouts from a lighthearted inclination to weave a narrative between disparate domains, in the hopes of infusing a hint of levity into the often arid expanse of scholarly research. However, much like a genetically engineered plant, what appears whimsical or improbable at first glance may harbor elements of unsuspected insight that warrant diligent examination.
As we embark on this eccentric expedition, let us cultivate an open mind and an appreciation for the absurdity that often permeates the pursuit of knowledge. Thus, we invite you to join our journey into the tangled intertwining of agrarian innovation and cyber curiosities, for who knows what fruitful yield of knowledge may sprout from this seemingly whimsical juxtaposition. After all, as seasoned researchers, we recognize that sometimes the most serendipitous discoveries are, quite literally, right under our noses – or should we say, roots?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9041997 between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Georgia and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background'. Astonishingly, this correlation exhibited a r-squared value of 0.8175771, indicating a substantial proportion of the variation in the search behavior being explained by the prevalence of GMO cotton in the state. The significance level (p < 0.01) further underscores the robustness of this unanticipated relationship, lending credence to the validity of the observed association.

Additionally, the scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually depicts the strong positive correlation between these two apparently unconnected variables, serving as a graphic testament to the surprising alignment of agricultural biotechnology and virtual aesthetic interests.

The magnitude of this correlation piqued our interest, akin to discovering a rare heirloom seed amidst a sea of hybrid varieties. One cannot help but marvel at the curious interplay between the cultivation of genetically modified cotton and the populace's predilection for seeking artistic inspiration in the digital realm. The findings of this study not only invite speculation but also fertilize the soil for future explorations into the idiosyncrasies of human behavior and the unforeseen repercussions of technological interventions in the agricultural landscape.

In conclusion, the results of our analysis unearth a captivating relationship that may have previously eluded scholarly consideration, prompting us to further plow the fertile ground of interdisciplinary research at the intersection of agrobiotechnology and cyber interactions. This unexpected correlation serves as a sprout of inspiration for future investigations and reinforces the notion that scholarly inquiry, much like a well-tended garden, often yields the most intriguing discoveries when sown with a sense of inquisitive playfulness.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Sowing Seeds of Curiosity: Exploring the Link Between GMO Cotton in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing correlation that may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a genetically modified haystack. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, we set out to investigate the potential relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in the state of Georgia and the behavior of internet users searching for 'desktop background'. The findings of our research unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9041997, with a significance level of p < 0.01, spanning from 2007 to 2022. Our analysis sheds light on the surprising connection between agricultural biotechnology and virtual aesthetic preferences, raising questions that may sprout further inquiries into the intersecting realms of crop cultivation and digital diversions. While the significance of such a correlation may seem as baffling as a disappearing crop circle, the implications of this serendipitous discovery prompt a harvest of new avenues for interdisciplinary investigation. We harvest the fruits of our study, yielding a playful yet thought-provoking perspective on the interconnectedness of agrarian innovation and cyber curiosity.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The exploration of seemingly unrelated phenomena has been a hallmark of scientific inquiry, often leading to serendipitous discoveries with profound implications. In "The Hidden Connections," Smith delves into the interconnectedness of disparate systems, highlighting the unsuspected links that underlie seemingly unrelated elements. This notion forms the crux of our investigation into the curious correlation between the use of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Georgia and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background'.
As we plow through the literature on GMO cotton, the works of Doe and Jones in "Agricultural Biotechnology and Its Impacts" provide a comprehensive view of the adoption and implications of GMO crops, primarily focusing on yield improvements and pest resistance. However, what they may not have anticipated is the potential impact of GMO cotton on the internet habits of virtual aesthetes. In a twist that rivals a crop rotation, our findings have uncovered a surprising alignment between the cultivation of biotechnologically modified cotton and the virtual quest for the perfect background for computer screens.
Shifting gears, the socio-economic dimensions of technology adoption and its impact on consumer behavior are examined in "The Long Tail" by Chris Anderson. Although Anderson's work primarily explores the digital marketplace, the concept of niche interests and the exploration of varied preferences resonates with our unearthing of an unexpected niche - the correlation between a specific agricultural practice and an unconventional online search behavior. Like a hybrid strain with unanticipated attributes, our study unveils a serendipitous hybridization of agricultural innovation and digital diversions, akin to stumbling upon an elusive genetic mutation in an ecosystem.
In the realm of fiction, the parallel development of complex, intertwined narratives bears semblance to the improbable link we have unearthed. In "The Cotton Patch" by Wallace, the interplay of characters and unforeseen connections mirrors the impromptu union of GMO cotton and digital questing that has emerged from our study. Similarly, the enigmatic search for truth and meaning in "The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time" by Haddon reflects the perplexing investigation that led to our unexpected revelation.
Embarking on a more contemporary avenue, social media exchanges have yielded threads of relevance to our peculiar discovery. In a Reddit post by user_GMOEnthusiast, an offhand remark about the proliferation of genetically modified cotton in Georgia sparked a lighthearted debate on the influence of agricultural practices on virtual desktop customization. This anecdotal exchange mirrors the conversational resonance of our study's unexpected juxtaposition, serving as a testament to the unanticipated connections that emerge in the digital agora.
As we delve into this inexplicably interconnected tapestry, our contributions meld the empirical with the absurd, the scholarly with the whimsical, yielding a harvest of insights that challenges traditional boundaries of inquiry. It is with equal parts incredulity and amusement that we present our findings, reaping the fruits of an investigation that has transgressed the conventional confines of scholarly exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9041997 between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Georgia and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background'. Astonishingly, this correlation exhibited a r-squared value of 0.8175771, indicating a substantial proportion of the variation in the search behavior being explained by the prevalence of GMO cotton in the state. The significance level (p < 0.01) further underscores the robustness of this unanticipated relationship, lending credence to the validity of the observed association.
Additionally, the scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually depicts the strong positive correlation between these two apparently unconnected variables, serving as a graphic testament to the surprising alignment of agricultural biotechnology and virtual aesthetic interests.
The magnitude of this correlation piqued our interest, akin to discovering a rare heirloom seed amidst a sea of hybrid varieties. One cannot help but marvel at the curious interplay between the cultivation of genetically modified cotton and the populace's predilection for seeking artistic inspiration in the digital realm. The findings of this study not only invite speculation but also fertilize the soil for future explorations into the idiosyncrasies of human behavior and the unforeseen repercussions of technological interventions in the agricultural landscape.
In conclusion, the results of our analysis unearth a captivating relationship that may have previously eluded scholarly consideration, prompting us to further plow the fertile ground of interdisciplinary research at the intersection of agrobiotechnology and cyber interactions. This unexpected correlation serves as a sprout of inspiration for future investigations and reinforces the notion that scholarly inquiry, much like a well-tended garden, often yields the most intriguing discoveries when sown with a sense of inquisitive playfulness.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

With many academics and farmers scratching their heads, it seems we have indeed struck pay dirt or rather, digital gold! Our findings have triumphantly confirmed the unexpected link between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Georgia and the fervent pursuit for the perfect digital backdrop. As we wade through this veritable sea of data, it's clear that this phenomenon is not just a mere case of correlation - it's a full-blown, groundbreaking association that could revolutionize the way we view both agricultural practices and virtual aesthetics.

Harking back to the offhand remark by user_GMOEnthusiast in the digital cornucopia of Reddit, we realize that the intersection of agricultural practices and online penchant for virtual desktop customization is not just a whimsical diversion but a serious subject of scholarly inquiry. Our results echo the sentiments of Wallace's "The Cotton Patch" - the unexpected connections we've unearthed are as complex and intertwined as any gripping narrative, and they have vast implications for both the agricultural and digital realms.

Furthermore, our study's alignment with the works of Smith and Anderson highlights the interconnectedness of seemingly diverse systems, showing that the tendrils of our findings reach far and wide, transcending conventional boundaries of research. Though the prospect of such an association may seem as unlikely as finding the proverbial needle in a crop of GMO cotton, our results have not only confirmed prior research but have also ploughed new ground for further interdisciplinary investigations.

Just as Anderson's 'The Long Tail' delved into niche interests in the digital marketplace, our study has brought to light an unexpected niche - the unconventional yet robust relationship between a specific agricultural practice and an idiosyncratic online search behavior. This unexpected connection, akin to discovering a rare heirloom seed, not only stands as a testament to the playfulness of scientific discovery but also provides fertile ground for future interdisciplinary research.

In a sense, the correlation coefficient of 0.9041997 is a badge of honor for serendipitous discovery, demonstrating that the most unexpected intersections can lead to truly remarkable insights. Our scatterplot, akin to a Mona Lisa made of data points, visually depicts the robust nature of this correlation, solidifying the veracity of this unusual connection in a visually stimulating manner.

Thus, emboldened by the robustness of our findings, we ready our intellectual plows for the cultivation of future inquiries into the uncharted territory that lies at the juncture of agricultural biotechnology and cyber whimsy. As both farmers and netizens look to this unexpected correlation with a mix of incredulity and amusement, we are encouraged to delve deeper into this fertile ground, confident that our labor will yield a bountiful harvest of scholarly insights and playful revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Georgia and Google searches for 'desktop background'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Sowing Seeds of Curiosity: Exploring the Link Between GMO Cotton in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the intriguing correlation that may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a genetically modified haystack. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, we set out to investigate the potential relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in the state of Georgia and the behavior of internet users searching for 'desktop background'. The findings of our research unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9041997, with a significance level of p < 0.01, spanning from 2007 to 2022. Our analysis sheds light on the surprising connection between agricultural biotechnology and virtual aesthetic preferences, raising questions that may sprout further inquiries into the intersecting realms of crop cultivation and digital diversions. While the significance of such a correlation may seem as baffling as a disappearing crop circle, the implications of this serendipitous discovery prompt a harvest of new avenues for interdisciplinary investigation. We harvest the fruits of our study, yielding a playful yet thought-provoking perspective on the interconnectedness of agrarian innovation and cyber curiosity.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The advent of genetically modified organism (GMO) crops has undeniably sparked widespread debates, with proponents touting its potential to address food security challenges and improve crop resilience, while skeptics raise concerns about ecological impacts and market monopolization. Amidst this polarized discourse, our study takes a peculiar turn down the cotton fields of Georgia, where we inadvertently stumbled upon a tangential correlation that seems as improbable as finding a needle in a biotechnologically enhanced haystack.
While conventional wisdom steers the discourse towards the agricultural and economic implications of GMO cotton adoption in Georgia, a whim of curiosity led us to explore the uncharted territory of internet search behavior. Specifically, our investigation delves into the enigmatic connection between the proliferation of GMO cotton and the peculiar penchant for internet users to seek out the perfect 'desktop background'.
It is important to soil our discussion with the acknowledgment that this exploration sprouts from a lighthearted inclination to weave a narrative between disparate domains, in the hopes of infusing a hint of levity into the often arid expanse of scholarly research. However, much like a genetically engineered plant, what appears whimsical or improbable at first glance may harbor elements of unsuspected insight that warrant diligent examination.
As we embark on this eccentric expedition, let us cultivate an open mind and an appreciation for the absurdity that often permeates the pursuit of knowledge. Thus, we invite you to join our journey into the tangled intertwining of agrarian innovation and cyber curiosities, for who knows what fruitful yield of knowledge may sprout from this seemingly whimsical juxtaposition. After all, as seasoned researchers, we recognize that sometimes the most serendipitous discoveries are, quite literally, right under our noses – or should we say, roots?

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9041997 between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Georgia and the frequency of Google searches for 'desktop background'. Astonishingly, this correlation exhibited a r-squared value of 0.8175771, indicating a substantial proportion of the variation in the search behavior being explained by the prevalence of GMO cotton in the state. The significance level (p < 0.01) further underscores the robustness of this unanticipated relationship, lending credence to the validity of the observed association.
Additionally, the scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually depicts the strong positive correlation between these two apparently unconnected variables, serving as a graphic testament to the surprising alignment of agricultural biotechnology and virtual aesthetic interests.
The magnitude of this correlation piqued our interest, akin to discovering a rare heirloom seed amidst a sea of hybrid varieties. One cannot help but marvel at the curious interplay between the cultivation of genetically modified cotton and the populace's predilection for seeking artistic inspiration in the digital realm. The findings of this study not only invite speculation but also fertilize the soil for future explorations into the idiosyncrasies of human behavior and the unforeseen repercussions of technological interventions in the agricultural landscape.
In conclusion, the results of our analysis unearth a captivating relationship that may have previously eluded scholarly consideration, prompting us to further plow the fertile ground of interdisciplinary research at the intersection of agrobiotechnology and cyber interactions. This unexpected correlation serves as a sprout of inspiration for future investigations and reinforces the notion that scholarly inquiry, much like a well-tended garden, often yields the most intriguing discoveries when sown with a sense of inquisitive playfulness.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In harvesting the fruits of our labor, we find ourselves not only amazed by the statistically significant correlation between GMO cotton adoption in Georgia and Google searches for 'desktop background', but also bemused by the whimsical nature of this unanticipated relationship. Who would have thought that the proliferation of biotechnologically enhanced cotton could sow the seeds of cyber curiosity, prompting users to seek digital aesthetic inspiration? As we reflect on the findings, it becomes evident that the intertwining of agrarian innovation and virtual predilections offers a garden of unconventional insights, ripe for further exploration.
However, in the spirit of scientific inquiry, we must exercise caution not to sow the seeds of overzealousness. As enticing as it may be to plow deeper into this unexpected correlation, we must acknowledge the limitations of our study, for research in this realm requires a delicate balance of curiosity and rigor. Therefore, we may conclude, with a lighthearted wink to the absurdity of scholarly pursuits, that no more research is needed in this ever-delightful yet enigmatic garden of GMO cotton and desktop backgrounds.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Sowing Seeds of Curiosity: Exploring the Link Between GMO Cotton in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Technology and Internet Usage


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Sowing Seeds of Curiosity: Exploring the Link Between GMO Cotton in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Innovation and Digital Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Sowing Seeds of Curiosity: Exploring the Link Between GMO Cotton in Georgia and Google Searches for 'Desktop Background' with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the intriguing correlation that may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a genetically modified haystack. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, we set out to investigate the potential relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in the state of Georgia and the behavior of internet users searching for 'desktop background'. The findings of our research unveiled a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9041997, with a significance level of p < 0.01, spanning from 2007 to 2022. Our analysis sheds light on the surprising connection between agricultural biotechnology and virtual aesthetic preferences, raising questions that may sprout further inquiries into the intersecting realms of crop cultivation and digital diversions. While the significance of such a correlation may seem as baffling as a disappearing crop circle, the implications of this serendipitous discovery prompt a harvest of new avenues for interdisciplinary investigation. We harvest the fruits of our study, yielding a playful yet thought-provoking perspective on the interconnectedness of agrarian innovation and cyber curiosity.

ChatGPT:

GMO cotton, Georgia, Google Trends, desktop background, USDA data, correlation coefficient, agricultural biotechnology, genetic modification, internet search behavior, cotton adoption, digital aesthetic preferences

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Georgia
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Georgia that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Georgia

Google searches for 'desktop background'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'desktop background' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'desktop background'

Correlation r = 0.9041997 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8175771 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'desktop background') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Georgia) over the 16 years from 2007 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.5E-6. 0.0000015365096145157719000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.00015% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 650,826 random variables You don't actually need 650 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.74, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in Georgia (GMO cotton %)1719202018135311411326
Google searches for 'desktop background' (Rel. search volume)81.833386.575.333366.166760.333354.7546.166741.916738.833330.583326.7523.916722.416724.752022.25




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([17,19,20,20,18,13,5,3,1,1,4,1,1,3,2,6,])
array_2 = np.array([81.8333,86.5,75.3333,66.1667,60.3333,54.75,46.1667,41.9167,38.8333,30.5833,26.75,23.9167,22.4167,24.75,20,22.25,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Georgia"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'desktop background'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 1503 · Black Variable ID: 770 · Red Variable ID: 1462
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0