about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,489 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and the second variable is Violent crime rates.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As GMO use in Missouri corn decreased, it led to a decline in the production of high-fructose corn syrup. With less of this sweet, sweet nectar of processed foods available, people experienced a collective mellowing out as their blood sugar levels stabilized. This, in turn, reduced the frequency of hangry outbursts and contributed to a statewide decrease in violent crime rates. It seems that the saying is true: you really are what you eat, and in this case, less genetically modified corn may have just created a more peaceful stalk-ation.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s. The scene depicts a field in Missouri with tall rows of genetically modified corn stretching into the distance. In the midst of the crops, a police car is parked, and officers are investigating a scene of a recent violent crime. The visual should capture the simplicity of the comic book style, with attention to details such as the texture of the cornfield and the classic muted color palette reminiscent of the 1960s. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and Violent crime rates. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre Cutsy art illustration Low poly A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Voxel art
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and Violent crime rates together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a field in Missouri, tall rows of genetically modified corn stretch out into the distance. Among the crops, a police car is parked, with officers investigating a scene of a recent violent crime.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a field in Missouri, tall rows of genetically modified corn stretch out into the distance. Among the crops, a police car is parked, with officers investigating a scene of a recent violent crime. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s. The scene depicts a field in Missouri with tall rows of genetically modified corn stretching into the distance. In the midst of the crops, a police car is parked, and officers are investigating a scene of a recent violent crime. The visual should capture the simplicity of the comic book style, with attention to details such as the texture of the cornfield and the classic muted color palette reminiscent of the 1960s.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in Missouri caused Violent crime rates to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Genetically Modified Corn: Is There a Link with Corny Crimes in Missouri?

The Journal of Agricultural Anomalies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and Violent crime rates. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7917998 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Corn: Is There a Link with Corny Crimes in Missouri?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential association between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Missouri and the prevalence of violent crimes. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we delved into the tangled cornfield to shed light on this captivating correlation. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7917998 and a p-value < 0.01, spanning the years from 2000 to 2022.

It's no kernel of corn-cern that genetically modified corn and crime may seem like a cob-ber... but we were a-maize-d by what we uncovered! While causation is indeed a tough nut to crack, our analysis suggests a noteworthy statistical relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the incidence of violent crimes in the Show-Me State. So, the next time you hear someone say, "That's corny!" you might want to consider the corn growing nearby and its potential impact on local crime rates.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and Violent crime rates. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Corn: Is There a Link with Corny Crimes in Missouri?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential association between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Missouri and the prevalence of violent crimes. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we delved into the tangled cornfield to shed light on this captivating correlation. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7917998 and a p-value < 0.01, spanning the years from 2000 to 2022.

It's no kernel of corn-cern that genetically modified corn and crime may seem like a cob-ber... but we were a-maize-d by what we uncovered! While causation is indeed a tough nut to crack, our analysis suggests a noteworthy statistical relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the incidence of violent crimes in the Show-Me State. So, the next time you hear someone say, "That's corny!" you might want to consider the corn growing nearby and its potential impact on local crime rates.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their potential influence on crime rates is as intriguing as a detective novel set in a cornfield. As GMOs continue to proliferate in agricultural practices, it's natural to wonder about the broader implications beyond crop yields and pest resistance. In a state like Missouri, where corn is a staple crop and the crime rates have their own corny charm, the potential connection between GMO use and violent crimes is as ripe for investigation as a juicy ear of corn.

Now, let's not get too corn-fused - we're not suggesting that GMOs have criminal intentions! But we can't deny that the potential impact of agricultural practices on society is a-maize-ing in all its implications. As the saying goes, "You can't make an omelet without breaking eggs" - and in this case, we're looking at the kernels of truth behind the relationship between GMOs and criminal behavior. It's a-maize-ing to think about how something as seemingly innocent as a corn kernel could have broader effects on the social fabric.

Moving beyond the puns and jokes, the relevance of this study is paramount. As genetically modified corn has become ubiquitous in modern agriculture, understanding any potential societal effects is not just an academic curiosity - it has substantial policy and economic implications. Plus, who wouldn't want to crack the case of the corny crimes in Missouri?

Our study aims to fill this gap in the literature by delving deep into the heart of the cornfield, metaphorically speaking of course, to examine the potential relationship between GMO use in corn and violent crime rates in Missouri. While one might think this correlation is as implausible as a corny superhero, our findings may just shuck that notion. So, put on your detective hats and buckle up - we're about to uncover some corny crimes and their potential connection to genetically modified corn in the Show-Me State!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and Violent crime rates. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Corn: Is There a Link with Corny Crimes in Missouri?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential association between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Missouri and the prevalence of violent crimes. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we delved into the tangled cornfield to shed light on this captivating correlation. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7917998 and a p-value < 0.01, spanning the years from 2000 to 2022.

It's no kernel of corn-cern that genetically modified corn and crime may seem like a cob-ber... but we were a-maize-d by what we uncovered! While causation is indeed a tough nut to crack, our analysis suggests a noteworthy statistical relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the incidence of violent crimes in the Show-Me State. So, the next time you hear someone say, "That's corny!" you might want to consider the corn growing nearby and its potential impact on local crime rates.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their potential influence on crime rates is as intriguing as a detective novel set in a cornfield. As GMOs continue to proliferate in agricultural practices, it's natural to wonder about the broader implications beyond crop yields and pest resistance. In a state like Missouri, where corn is a staple crop and the crime rates have their own corny charm, the potential connection between GMO use and violent crimes is as ripe for investigation as a juicy ear of corn.
Now, let's not get too corn-fused - we're not suggesting that GMOs have criminal intentions! But we can't deny that the potential impact of agricultural practices on society is a-maize-ing in all its implications. As the saying goes, "You can't make an omelet without breaking eggs" - and in this case, we're looking at the kernels of truth behind the relationship between GMOs and criminal behavior. It's a-maize-ing to think about how something as seemingly innocent as a corn kernel could have broader effects on the social fabric.
Moving beyond the puns and jokes, the relevance of this study is paramount. As genetically modified corn has become ubiquitous in modern agriculture, understanding any potential societal effects is not just an academic curiosity - it has substantial policy and economic implications. Plus, who wouldn't want to crack the case of the corny crimes in Missouri?
Our study aims to fill this gap in the literature by delving deep into the heart of the cornfield, metaphorically speaking of course, to examine the potential relationship between GMO use in corn and violent crime rates in Missouri. While one might think this correlation is as implausible as a corny superhero, our findings may just shuck that notion. So, put on your detective hats and buckle up - we're about to uncover some corny crimes and their potential connection to genetically modified corn in the Show-Me State!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith (2015) explored the potential impact of genetically modified corn on agricultural practices and crop yields, shedding light on the widespread adoption of GMOs in the United States. Doe and Jones (2018) extended this line of research to investigate the socioeconomic implications of GMO use in staple crops, noting the complex interplay between agricultural innovation and societal dynamics. While these studies provide valuable insights into the agricultural landscape, they certainly didn't anticipate the correlation we're about to uncover - it's a-maize-ing!

Lorem and Ipsum (2020) delved into the statistical link between corn production and crime rates, but their focus was not specifically on genetically modified corn. However, their findings laid the groundwork for our investigation, guiding us through the cornstalks of data to discern a potential connection that might have been as elusive as a corn maze in the dark. A-maize-ing, isn't it?

Moving beyond the scholarly literature, books such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Fast Food Nation" by Eric Schlosser have brought attention to the broader implications of agricultural practices on society. These works, while not directly addressing genetically modified corn and crime, offer a thought-provoking backdrop for our investigation. It's clear that the cornfield isn't just a setting for bucolic tales - it's a stage for societal drama and potential criminal intrigue!

Turning to fictional works, novels like "Children of the Corn" by Stephen King and "Corn Country" by Homer C. Castle provide a more dramatic and, dare we say, corny perspective on life in rural settings. While purely works of fiction, these books prompt us to consider the role of corn in shaping narratives - both real and imagined. After all, a little fictional inspiration can't hurt when unraveling the mysteries of genetically modified corn and its potential ties to crime, right?

In our quest for insight, watching TV shows such as "American Crime Story" and "Mindhunter" has provided a voyeuristic glimpse into the world of criminal investigations and behavioral analysis. While not directly related to agricultural practices, the motifs of crime and investigation certainly add an enticing layer to our exploration. Perhaps we could use some of their sleuthing techniques to crack the case of the corny crimes in Missouri - or at least have a good chuckle along the way!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and Violent crime rates. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Corn: Is There a Link with Corny Crimes in Missouri?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential association between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Missouri and the prevalence of violent crimes. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we delved into the tangled cornfield to shed light on this captivating correlation. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7917998 and a p-value < 0.01, spanning the years from 2000 to 2022.

It's no kernel of corn-cern that genetically modified corn and crime may seem like a cob-ber... but we were a-maize-d by what we uncovered! While causation is indeed a tough nut to crack, our analysis suggests a noteworthy statistical relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the incidence of violent crimes in the Show-Me State. So, the next time you hear someone say, "That's corny!" you might want to consider the corn growing nearby and its potential impact on local crime rates.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their potential influence on crime rates is as intriguing as a detective novel set in a cornfield. As GMOs continue to proliferate in agricultural practices, it's natural to wonder about the broader implications beyond crop yields and pest resistance. In a state like Missouri, where corn is a staple crop and the crime rates have their own corny charm, the potential connection between GMO use and violent crimes is as ripe for investigation as a juicy ear of corn.
Now, let's not get too corn-fused - we're not suggesting that GMOs have criminal intentions! But we can't deny that the potential impact of agricultural practices on society is a-maize-ing in all its implications. As the saying goes, "You can't make an omelet without breaking eggs" - and in this case, we're looking at the kernels of truth behind the relationship between GMOs and criminal behavior. It's a-maize-ing to think about how something as seemingly innocent as a corn kernel could have broader effects on the social fabric.
Moving beyond the puns and jokes, the relevance of this study is paramount. As genetically modified corn has become ubiquitous in modern agriculture, understanding any potential societal effects is not just an academic curiosity - it has substantial policy and economic implications. Plus, who wouldn't want to crack the case of the corny crimes in Missouri?
Our study aims to fill this gap in the literature by delving deep into the heart of the cornfield, metaphorically speaking of course, to examine the potential relationship between GMO use in corn and violent crime rates in Missouri. While one might think this correlation is as implausible as a corny superhero, our findings may just shuck that notion. So, put on your detective hats and buckle up - we're about to uncover some corny crimes and their potential connection to genetically modified corn in the Show-Me State!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the potential link between GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and the prevalence of violent crimes, our research team employed a curious combination of data acquisition and statistical analyses. We dipped our toes into the whirlwind of agricultural data, plucked ears of information from the fields of crime statistics, and traversed the maze of correlations to uncover the kernels of truth behind this intriguing relationship.

First, we gathered extensive data on the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation in Missouri from 2000 to 2022. We diligently scoured the USDA databases, extracting information on the prevalence of GMO corn varieties, acreage under cultivation, and dispersion across different counties within the state. Our team even joked that we needed to be as methodical as a cornstalk to navigate through the copious amounts of agricultural data.

Next, to examine the prevalence of violent crimes and their potential association with GMO use in the cornfields, we tapped into the abundant resources of the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. With a kernel of curiosity and a bushel of data, we navigated through crime rates, offense types, and geographic patterns, all the while making sure not to get lost in the stalks of statistics.

Now, here's where the research takes a hilarious turn – bear with me. We decided to employ a statistical approach that was as unconventional as a mutant corn stalk. We created a “cloning” algorithm that took the data on GMO use and crime rates, and essentially cross-pollinated them to identify any patterns that might have “sprouted” from this relationship. We even joked that we were growing a statistical cornfield to cultivate our findings.

Following this, our team performed a series of regression analyses, using the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation as the independent variable and violent crime rates as the dependent variable. We also took into account various potential confounding variables such as population density, economic indicators, and demographic factors as we sought to weed out any spurious associations. We had to make sure this research didn't turn into a corny conspiracy theory!

In addition to these analyses, we employed geographic information system (GIS) mapping techniques to visually chart the distribution of GMO corn cultivation and the spatial patterns of violent crime rates across Missouri. This allowed us to see the corn-crime landscape in an entirely new light – we were almost tempted to don gardening hats and take up a side career in corn field research!

As we ventured through this quirky terrain of statistical analysis and data crunching, we were careful to account for potential sources of bias and ensure that our findings were as robust as a sturdy cornstalk in a summer breeze. We certainly didn't want to yield to the temptation of presenting half-baked results!

In summary, our methodology embraced the unexpected twists and turns of GMO and crime data, weaving together statistical analyses, spatial mapping, and a touch of unconventional humor to uncover the potential link between genetically modified corn and violent crimes in the state of Missouri. It was an a-maize-ing journey, and we're excited to share the corny yet compelling results with the academic and agricultural community – after all, who wouldn't want to know if there's an ear-resistible connection between GMOs and crime in the Show-Me State?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and Violent crime rates. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7917998, r-squared of 0.6269469, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Corn: Is There a Link with Corny Crimes in Missouri?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential association between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Missouri and the prevalence of violent crimes. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we delved into the tangled cornfield to shed light on this captivating correlation. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7917998 and a p-value < 0.01, spanning the years from 2000 to 2022.

It's no kernel of corn-cern that genetically modified corn and crime may seem like a cob-ber... but we were a-maize-d by what we uncovered! While causation is indeed a tough nut to crack, our analysis suggests a noteworthy statistical relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the incidence of violent crimes in the Show-Me State. So, the next time you hear someone say, "That's corny!" you might want to consider the corn growing nearby and its potential impact on local crime rates.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their potential influence on crime rates is as intriguing as a detective novel set in a cornfield. As GMOs continue to proliferate in agricultural practices, it's natural to wonder about the broader implications beyond crop yields and pest resistance. In a state like Missouri, where corn is a staple crop and the crime rates have their own corny charm, the potential connection between GMO use and violent crimes is as ripe for investigation as a juicy ear of corn.
Now, let's not get too corn-fused - we're not suggesting that GMOs have criminal intentions! But we can't deny that the potential impact of agricultural practices on society is a-maize-ing in all its implications. As the saying goes, "You can't make an omelet without breaking eggs" - and in this case, we're looking at the kernels of truth behind the relationship between GMOs and criminal behavior. It's a-maize-ing to think about how something as seemingly innocent as a corn kernel could have broader effects on the social fabric.
Moving beyond the puns and jokes, the relevance of this study is paramount. As genetically modified corn has become ubiquitous in modern agriculture, understanding any potential societal effects is not just an academic curiosity - it has substantial policy and economic implications. Plus, who wouldn't want to crack the case of the corny crimes in Missouri?
Our study aims to fill this gap in the literature by delving deep into the heart of the cornfield, metaphorically speaking of course, to examine the potential relationship between GMO use in corn and violent crime rates in Missouri. While one might think this correlation is as implausible as a corny superhero, our findings may just shuck that notion. So, put on your detective hats and buckle up - we're about to uncover some corny crimes and their potential connection to genetically modified corn in the Show-Me State!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

In examining the potential connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Missouri and the prevalence of violent crimes, our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.7917998. This suggests a strong positive relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the incidence of violent crimes in the state. It's like they say, "You can't escape the corn-nection!"

The r-squared value of 0.6269469 further emphasizes the noteworthy statistical relationship identified in our research. This indicates that approximately 62.69% of the variation in violent crime rates in Missouri can be explained by the variation in GMO use in corn cultivation. Talk about corn-clusive evidence!

Of course, with a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings are statistically significant. This means that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation between GMO use in corn and violent crime rates by mere chance is as slim as finding a needle in a corn maze.

Fig. 1 illustrates the undeniable correlation between GMO use in corn and violent crime rates in Missouri. It's a visual representation that speaks louder than words, much like a dad joke at the dinner table. And if a picture is worth a thousand words, this scatterplot is surely worth a "corn-ucopia" of insights!

In summary, our research findings suggest a compelling link between genetically modified corn and violent crime in Missouri. This correlation may just be the kernel of truth that researchers and policymakers need to consider when evaluating the broader societal impacts of GMO use in agriculture. It seems that in the case of GMOs and crime, the corn definitely knows!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and Violent crime rates. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Corn: Is There a Link with Corny Crimes in Missouri?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential association between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Missouri and the prevalence of violent crimes. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we delved into the tangled cornfield to shed light on this captivating correlation. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7917998 and a p-value < 0.01, spanning the years from 2000 to 2022.

It's no kernel of corn-cern that genetically modified corn and crime may seem like a cob-ber... but we were a-maize-d by what we uncovered! While causation is indeed a tough nut to crack, our analysis suggests a noteworthy statistical relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the incidence of violent crimes in the Show-Me State. So, the next time you hear someone say, "That's corny!" you might want to consider the corn growing nearby and its potential impact on local crime rates.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith (2015) explored the potential impact of genetically modified corn on agricultural practices and crop yields, shedding light on the widespread adoption of GMOs in the United States. Doe and Jones (2018) extended this line of research to investigate the socioeconomic implications of GMO use in staple crops, noting the complex interplay between agricultural innovation and societal dynamics. While these studies provide valuable insights into the agricultural landscape, they certainly didn't anticipate the correlation we're about to uncover - it's a-maize-ing!
Lorem and Ipsum (2020) delved into the statistical link between corn production and crime rates, but their focus was not specifically on genetically modified corn. However, their findings laid the groundwork for our investigation, guiding us through the cornstalks of data to discern a potential connection that might have been as elusive as a corn maze in the dark. A-maize-ing, isn't it?
Moving beyond the scholarly literature, books such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Fast Food Nation" by Eric Schlosser have brought attention to the broader implications of agricultural practices on society. These works, while not directly addressing genetically modified corn and crime, offer a thought-provoking backdrop for our investigation. It's clear that the cornfield isn't just a setting for bucolic tales - it's a stage for societal drama and potential criminal intrigue!
Turning to fictional works, novels like "Children of the Corn" by Stephen King and "Corn Country" by Homer C. Castle provide a more dramatic and, dare we say, corny perspective on life in rural settings. While purely works of fiction, these books prompt us to consider the role of corn in shaping narratives - both real and imagined. After all, a little fictional inspiration can't hurt when unraveling the mysteries of genetically modified corn and its potential ties to crime, right?
In our quest for insight, watching TV shows such as "American Crime Story" and "Mindhunter" has provided a voyeuristic glimpse into the world of criminal investigations and behavioral analysis. While not directly related to agricultural practices, the motifs of crime and investigation certainly add an enticing layer to our exploration. Perhaps we could use some of their sleuthing techniques to crack the case of the corny crimes in Missouri - or at least have a good chuckle along the way!

[[RESULTS]]
In examining the potential connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Missouri and the prevalence of violent crimes, our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.7917998. This suggests a strong positive relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the incidence of violent crimes in the state. It's like they say, "You can't escape the corn-nection!"
The r-squared value of 0.6269469 further emphasizes the noteworthy statistical relationship identified in our research. This indicates that approximately 62.69% of the variation in violent crime rates in Missouri can be explained by the variation in GMO use in corn cultivation. Talk about corn-clusive evidence!
Of course, with a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings are statistically significant. This means that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation between GMO use in corn and violent crime rates by mere chance is as slim as finding a needle in a corn maze.
Fig. 1 illustrates the undeniable correlation between GMO use in corn and violent crime rates in Missouri. It's a visual representation that speaks louder than words, much like a dad joke at the dinner table. And if a picture is worth a thousand words, this scatterplot is surely worth a "corn-ucopia" of insights!
In summary, our research findings suggest a compelling link between genetically modified corn and violent crime in Missouri. This correlation may just be the kernel of truth that researchers and policymakers need to consider when evaluating the broader societal impacts of GMO use in agriculture. It seems that in the case of GMOs and crime, the corn definitely knows!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation into the potential relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Missouri and the prevalence of violent crimes has yielded fascinating results. The remarkably strong correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value accentuate a compelling association, reminiscent of a "corny" punchline that hits just right.

The findings of our study align with prior research by Smith (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), who highlighted the widespread adoption of GMOs in staple crops and the complex interplay between agricultural innovation and societal dynamics. While their focus was not on crime rates, our results extend and support their work by revealing an unexpected connection that may have eluded prior investigations – It's like we uncovered the corn in a cornfield! This remarkable correspondence between GMO use in corn and violent crime rates underscores the importance of considering agricultural practices in the broader context of societal outcomes. It's as clear as day – the cultivation of corn, particularly genetically modified varieties, may have more far-reaching implications than previously anticipated.

Moreover, Lorem and Ipsum's (2020) statistical exploration of corn production and crime rates laid the groundwork for our investigation, guiding us through the intricate "cornstalks" of data. We were able to build upon their insights and leverage their foundational work to discern a potential link that, much like a captivating corn maze, required methodical navigation. Our findings not only validate but also build upon their groundwork, shedding light on the elusive connection between genetically modified corn and crime rates. It's like we found the perfect balance of corniness and seriousness in our research findings – a-maize-ing, isn't it?

Our results also offer a refreshing perspective on the broader context of agricultural practices and societal outcomes, resonating with the thought-provoking backdrop set by Pollan, Schlosser, and even fictional works like "Children of the Corn" and "Corn Country." These sources, which initially seemed a-maize-ingly tangential, have become unexpectedly relevant to our study. We've learned that the cornfield isn't just a passive backdrop; it's an active player in shaping society, much like a kernel of truth that's been hiding in plain sight all along.

In summary, the whimsical interplay of corn and crime in Missouri may have seemed like a jest, but our research unearths a compelling and serious association, akin to a dad joke that suddenly becomes the talk of the town. As researchers, it's essential to remain open to unexpected discoveries and embrace the synergies between seemingly disparate subjects. Our investigation has certainly demonstrated that sometimes, the most surprising "corn-nections" hold the key to understanding complex societal dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and Violent crime rates. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Genetically Modified Corn: Is There a Link with Corny Crimes in Missouri?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper investigates the potential association between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Missouri and the prevalence of violent crimes. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we delved into the tangled cornfield to shed light on this captivating correlation. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7917998 and a p-value < 0.01, spanning the years from 2000 to 2022.

It's no kernel of corn-cern that genetically modified corn and crime may seem like a cob-ber... but we were a-maize-d by what we uncovered! While causation is indeed a tough nut to crack, our analysis suggests a noteworthy statistical relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the incidence of violent crimes in the Show-Me State. So, the next time you hear someone say, "That's corny!" you might want to consider the corn growing nearby and its potential impact on local crime rates.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their potential influence on crime rates is as intriguing as a detective novel set in a cornfield. As GMOs continue to proliferate in agricultural practices, it's natural to wonder about the broader implications beyond crop yields and pest resistance. In a state like Missouri, where corn is a staple crop and the crime rates have their own corny charm, the potential connection between GMO use and violent crimes is as ripe for investigation as a juicy ear of corn.
Now, let's not get too corn-fused - we're not suggesting that GMOs have criminal intentions! But we can't deny that the potential impact of agricultural practices on society is a-maize-ing in all its implications. As the saying goes, "You can't make an omelet without breaking eggs" - and in this case, we're looking at the kernels of truth behind the relationship between GMOs and criminal behavior. It's a-maize-ing to think about how something as seemingly innocent as a corn kernel could have broader effects on the social fabric.
Moving beyond the puns and jokes, the relevance of this study is paramount. As genetically modified corn has become ubiquitous in modern agriculture, understanding any potential societal effects is not just an academic curiosity - it has substantial policy and economic implications. Plus, who wouldn't want to crack the case of the corny crimes in Missouri?
Our study aims to fill this gap in the literature by delving deep into the heart of the cornfield, metaphorically speaking of course, to examine the potential relationship between GMO use in corn and violent crime rates in Missouri. While one might think this correlation is as implausible as a corny superhero, our findings may just shuck that notion. So, put on your detective hats and buckle up - we're about to uncover some corny crimes and their potential connection to genetically modified corn in the Show-Me State!

[[RESULTS]]
In examining the potential connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Missouri and the prevalence of violent crimes, our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.7917998. This suggests a strong positive relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the incidence of violent crimes in the state. It's like they say, "You can't escape the corn-nection!"
The r-squared value of 0.6269469 further emphasizes the noteworthy statistical relationship identified in our research. This indicates that approximately 62.69% of the variation in violent crime rates in Missouri can be explained by the variation in GMO use in corn cultivation. Talk about corn-clusive evidence!
Of course, with a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings are statistically significant. This means that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation between GMO use in corn and violent crime rates by mere chance is as slim as finding a needle in a corn maze.
Fig. 1 illustrates the undeniable correlation between GMO use in corn and violent crime rates in Missouri. It's a visual representation that speaks louder than words, much like a dad joke at the dinner table. And if a picture is worth a thousand words, this scatterplot is surely worth a "corn-ucopia" of insights!
In summary, our research findings suggest a compelling link between genetically modified corn and violent crime in Missouri. This correlation may just be the kernel of truth that researchers and policymakers need to consider when evaluating the broader societal impacts of GMO use in agriculture. It seems that in the case of GMOs and crime, the corn definitely knows!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has shucked the notion that the relationship between genetically modified corn and violent crime in Missouri is nothing more than a tall tale. Our findings reveal a statistically significant correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7917998 and a r-squared value of 0.6269469. It's as if the GMOs proclaimed, "We will kernel you with kindness - or crime!"

The visual representation in Fig. 1 leaves no room for doubt - the correlation between GMO use in corn and violent crime rates in Missouri is as clear as day, much like a cornstalk in the sunlight. It's like the cornfields are whispering, "You can hide, but you can't cob-ver up the truth!"

As we wrap up this study, we must acknowledge the limitations, such as potential confounding variables and the inability to establish causation. However, as they say, "When life gives you GMO corn, make cornbread, not criminal mischief!" It's important to consider the societal implications and continue examining the ripple effects of agricultural practices on the fabric of our communities.

Nevertheless, with the evidence we've gleaned, it's safe to say that no more research is needed in this area. It's time to pop the corn and accept that GMO use in corn cultivation in Missouri may indeed be correlated with violent crime rates. It's a-maize-ing!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Genetically Modified Corn: Is There a Link with Corny Crimes in Missouri?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Anomalies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Genetically Modified Corn: Is There a Link with Corny Crimes in Missouri?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agricultural Anomalies Research and Investigation


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Genetically Modified Corn: Is There a Link with Corny Crimes in Missouri? with an abstract of This research paper investigates the potential association between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Missouri and the prevalence of violent crimes. Leveraging data from the USDA and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we delved into the tangled cornfield to shed light on this captivating correlation. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.7917998 and a p-value < 0.01, spanning the years from 2000 to 2022.
It's no kernel of corn-cern that genetically modified corn and crime may seem like a cob-ber... but we were a-maize-d by what we uncovered! While causation is indeed a tough nut to crack, our analysis suggests a noteworthy statistical relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation and the incidence of violent crimes in the Show-Me State. So, the next time you hear someone say, "That's corny!" you might want to consider the corn growing nearby and its potential impact on local crime rates.

ChatGPT:

genetically modified corn, GMOs, corn cultivation, Missouri, violent crimes, USDA data, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, correlation coefficient, statistical relationship, local crime rates

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Missouri
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Missouri that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Missouri

Violent crime rates
Detailed data title: The violent crime rate per 100,000 residents in United States
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Violent crime rates

Correlation r = 0.7917998 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6269469 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 62.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Violent crime rates) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Missouri) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.8E-6. 0.0000067608055102442450000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.79 in 0.00068% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 147,911 random variables You don't actually need 147 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.56, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in corn grown in Missouri (GMO corn %)202327323237383027231527185454222223
Violent crime rates (Violent crime)506.5504.5494.4475.8463.2469479.3471.8458.6431.9404.5387.1387.8369.1361.6373.7397.5394.9383.4380.8398.5387380.7




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([20,23,27,32,32,37,38,30,27,23,15,27,18,5,4,5,4,2,2,2,2,2,3,])
array_2 = np.array([506.5,504.5,494.4,475.8,463.2,469,479.3,471.8,458.6,431.9,404.5,387.1,387.8,369.1,361.6,373.7,397.5,394.9,383.4,380.8,398.5,387,380.7,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Missouri"
array_2_name = "Violent crime rates"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 1489 · Black Variable ID: 716 · Red Variable ID: 20220
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0