about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,453 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Yogurt consumption and the second variable is Yearly Total Gross Income of US Farms.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The probiotic bacteria in yogurt formed a secret alliance with the crops, leading to a bumper harvest and increased farm income.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a high-tech farmer, taking a break amid a futuristic agricultural setting. The farmer, dressed in advanced agricultural gear, sits against an ultra-modern irrigation system, enjoying a bowl of freshly made yogurt. In the background, advanced robotics are seen harvesting the year's crops with precision and efficiency. The atmosphere should portray a high-tech yet natural and serene ambiance, with the farmer's stoic expression conveying the hard work and dedication that goes into running the technologically advanced farm. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Yogurt consumption and Yearly Total Gross Income of US Farms. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy graphics Oragami A TIME magazine cover image High-tech High-tech
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Yogurt consumption and Yearly Total Gross Income of US Farms together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A farmer takes a break from tending the fields to enjoy a bowl of freshly made yogurt, while nearby, the year's crops are being harvested in preparation for sale. The sweat on the farmer's brow indicates the hard work that goes into producing the yearly total gross income of the farm.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: A farmer takes a break from tending the fields to enjoy a bowl of freshly made yogurt, while nearby, the year's crops are being harvested in preparation for sale. The sweat on the farmer's brow indicates the hard work that goes into producing the yearly total gross income of the farm. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a high-tech farmer, taking a break amid a futuristic agricultural setting. The farmer, dressed in advanced agricultural gear, sits against an ultra-modern irrigation system, enjoying a bowl of freshly made yogurt. In the background, advanced robotics are seen harvesting the year's crops with precision and efficiency. The atmosphere should portray a high-tech yet natural and serene ambiance, with the farmer's stoic expression conveying the hard work and dedication that goes into running the technologically advanced farm.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humerus responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Yogurt consumption caused Yearly Total Gross Income of US Farms to increase. Make it silly.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Culture of Yogurt: Exploring the Wheyward Connection Between Yogurt Consumption and US Farm Income

The Journal of Probiotic Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Yogurt consumption and Yearly Total Gross Income of US Farms. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9390802 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Culture of Yogurt: Exploring the Wheyward Connection Between Yogurt Consumption and US Farm Income

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the unexpected and downright curd-ious relationship between yogurt consumption and the yearly total gross income of US farms. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, our research team delved into the world of yogurt and farm finances to unravel this dairy dilemma. After analyzing the numbers from 2000 to 2021, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9390802 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong link between the two. So, grab a spoonful of yogurt and join us on this creamy journey as we dig into the delightful dairy science that transcends the bottom line of US farm income!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Yogurt consumption and Yearly Total Gross Income of US Farms. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Culture of Yogurt: Exploring the Wheyward Connection Between Yogurt Consumption and US Farm Income

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the unexpected and downright curd-ious relationship between yogurt consumption and the yearly total gross income of US farms. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, our research team delved into the world of yogurt and farm finances to unravel this dairy dilemma. After analyzing the numbers from 2000 to 2021, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9390802 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong link between the two. So, grab a spoonful of yogurt and join us on this creamy journey as we dig into the delightful dairy science that transcends the bottom line of US farm income!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Welcome, dairy enthusiasts and financial fro-yo fanatics! Today, we embark on a journey that takes us from the creamy landscapes of yogurt consumption to the churning whirlwind of US farm income. In a dairy-related twist on the renowned "you are what you eat" adage, we are about to explore just how much "you are what you yogurt" might reveal about the economic fortunes of US farms.

The connection between yogurt and farm income may initially seem about as straightforward as finding a needle in a haystack made of cheese, yet our investigation has revealed a delightfully cheesy correlation that is not to be underestimated. While some may speculate that this link is as improbable as finding a four-leaf clover in a pasture, our data – oh-so-beautifully captured by the USDA and Statista – tells a different story.

As we delve into the delightful world of dairy and dollars, our research will unpick the intricacies of yogurt consumption, not just in terms of its gastronomic appeal, but also in relation to its potential impact on the financial fortunes of US farms. We'll be navigating through the statistical pastures, braving the treacherous terrain of correlation coefficients and p-values as we seek to separate the cream from the whey.

So, grab your lab coat and a spoonful of your favorite yogurt flavor, and join us in this study that takes us from the science lab to the barnyard – a journey where the "cultures" we'll explore are just as likely to refer to probiotics as they are to denote anthropological customs. Let's not cry over spilled milk, for this investigation is bound to be udderly enlightening and quite the "whey" to spend our time!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Yogurt consumption and Yearly Total Gross Income of US Farms. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Culture of Yogurt: Exploring the Wheyward Connection Between Yogurt Consumption and US Farm Income

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the unexpected and downright curd-ious relationship between yogurt consumption and the yearly total gross income of US farms. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, our research team delved into the world of yogurt and farm finances to unravel this dairy dilemma. After analyzing the numbers from 2000 to 2021, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9390802 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong link between the two. So, grab a spoonful of yogurt and join us on this creamy journey as we dig into the delightful dairy science that transcends the bottom line of US farm income!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome, dairy enthusiasts and financial fro-yo fanatics! Today, we embark on a journey that takes us from the creamy landscapes of yogurt consumption to the churning whirlwind of US farm income. In a dairy-related twist on the renowned "you are what you eat" adage, we are about to explore just how much "you are what you yogurt" might reveal about the economic fortunes of US farms.
The connection between yogurt and farm income may initially seem about as straightforward as finding a needle in a haystack made of cheese, yet our investigation has revealed a delightfully cheesy correlation that is not to be underestimated. While some may speculate that this link is as improbable as finding a four-leaf clover in a pasture, our data – oh-so-beautifully captured by the USDA and Statista – tells a different story.
As we delve into the delightful world of dairy and dollars, our research will unpick the intricacies of yogurt consumption, not just in terms of its gastronomic appeal, but also in relation to its potential impact on the financial fortunes of US farms. We'll be navigating through the statistical pastures, braving the treacherous terrain of correlation coefficients and p-values as we seek to separate the cream from the whey.
So, grab your lab coat and a spoonful of your favorite yogurt flavor, and join us in this study that takes us from the science lab to the barnyard – a journey where the "cultures" we'll explore are just as likely to refer to probiotics as they are to denote anthropological customs. Let's not cry over spilled milk, for this investigation is bound to be udderly enlightening and quite the "whey" to spend our time!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The study of the wheyward connection between yogurt consumption and US farm income has garnered increasing attention in recent years. Smith, et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of yogurt consumption patterns and their potential influence on agricultural economics. Their findings indicated a positive correlation between yogurt consumption per capita and the yearly total gross income of US farms, highlighting the potential impact of dairy delights on financial outcomes in the agricultural sector.

Building on this foundation, Doe and Johnson (2018) explored the contextual factors influencing yogurt consumption, shedding light on the socio-economic dynamics that intertwine with dairy product preferences. Their work elucidates the multifaceted nature of consumer behavior, emphasizing the need to consider not only the nutritional aspects but also the cultural and economic dimensions of yogurt consumption.

In "The Yogurt Economy: A Creamy Perspective" by Jones (2017), the author presents a holistic examination of the dairy industry, delving into the ramifications of yogurt market trends on agricultural revenue. The study underscores the complex interplay between consumer demand, production costs, and farm income, illustrating the intricate dance of supply and demand in the creamy marketplace.

Turning to non-fiction works with insights relevant to our investigation, Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" offers thought-provoking perspectives on food production and its economic repercussions. While not specifically focused on yogurt, Pollan's exploration of the agricultural landscape provides valuable context for understanding the broader forces at play in the food industry.

In a fictional twist, the dystopian novel "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley may seem far removed from the realm of dairy economics at first glance. However, Huxley's portrayal of a stratified society, with distinct class divisions and consumer behaviors, prompts contemplation of the societal influences on food consumption patterns and, by extension, their impact on agricultural economics.

As the literature review expanded, our research team delved into unexpected sources of insight, including the backs of random shampoo bottles, in a desperate attempt to unearth any shred of relevance to our investigation. Though the shampoo bottles offered no substantive contributions to the yogurt-farm income nexus, the endeavor did provide an amusing diversion and a newfound appreciation for the unintentional humor found in cosmetic product descriptions.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Yogurt consumption and Yearly Total Gross Income of US Farms. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista . You used data from 2000 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Culture of Yogurt: Exploring the Wheyward Connection Between Yogurt Consumption and US Farm Income

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the unexpected and downright curd-ious relationship between yogurt consumption and the yearly total gross income of US farms. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, our research team delved into the world of yogurt and farm finances to unravel this dairy dilemma. After analyzing the numbers from 2000 to 2021, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9390802 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong link between the two. So, grab a spoonful of yogurt and join us on this creamy journey as we dig into the delightful dairy science that transcends the bottom line of US farm income!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Welcome, dairy enthusiasts and financial fro-yo fanatics! Today, we embark on a journey that takes us from the creamy landscapes of yogurt consumption to the churning whirlwind of US farm income. In a dairy-related twist on the renowned "you are what you eat" adage, we are about to explore just how much "you are what you yogurt" might reveal about the economic fortunes of US farms.
The connection between yogurt and farm income may initially seem about as straightforward as finding a needle in a haystack made of cheese, yet our investigation has revealed a delightfully cheesy correlation that is not to be underestimated. While some may speculate that this link is as improbable as finding a four-leaf clover in a pasture, our data – oh-so-beautifully captured by the USDA and Statista – tells a different story.
As we delve into the delightful world of dairy and dollars, our research will unpick the intricacies of yogurt consumption, not just in terms of its gastronomic appeal, but also in relation to its potential impact on the financial fortunes of US farms. We'll be navigating through the statistical pastures, braving the treacherous terrain of correlation coefficients and p-values as we seek to separate the cream from the whey.
So, grab your lab coat and a spoonful of your favorite yogurt flavor, and join us in this study that takes us from the science lab to the barnyard – a journey where the "cultures" we'll explore are just as likely to refer to probiotics as they are to denote anthropological customs. Let's not cry over spilled milk, for this investigation is bound to be udderly enlightening and quite the "whey" to spend our time!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the yogurt-yielding secrets of US farm income, a plethora of data-driven ingredients were carefully mixed and churned by our research team to concoct a methodology as rich and creamy as a full-fat Greek yogurt.

First, we harnessed the power of technology to harvest a cornucopia of statistical data on yogurt consumption and US farm income from the seemingly endless pastures of the internet. After careful curation, data primarily sourced from the USDA and Statista was transformed into the main ingredients of our flavorful analysis, spanning the years 2000 to 2021.

With these vital nutrients at our disposal, the data underwent a rigorous churn, akin to the process of transforming milk into the delectable delight that is yogurt. We employed a variety of statistical tools, including correlation analysis and regression modeling, to whip our ingredients into a harmonious blend, seeking to uncover any underlying patterns.

To ensure that our findings were not merely a fluke or a statistical quirk, we employed a flavor of rigorous significance testing that makes the taste of a scorching hot chili sauce seem tame by comparison. We aimed for a palatable level of statistical significance, setting the bar high at p < 0.01, to ensure that the reported relationships between yogurt consumption and US farm income were not mere statistical bubbles that would burst upon closer examination.

In addition to scrutinizing the direct relationship between yogurt consumption and US farm income, we also explored the potential confounding effects of various covariates, such as milk prices, farm subsidies, and even weather patterns. This was akin to examining the array of toppings and mix-ins available at a frozen yogurt stand – an exploration that added layers of complexity to our dairy-filled narrative.

Finally, to ensure that our results would stand the test of time and avoid the souring effects of spurious correlations, we engaged in rigorous sensitivity analyses and cross-validation procedures. This was akin to fortifying our findings against the potential ravages of time and ensuring that they would remain as robust and resistant to decay as a jar of long-lasting, probiotic-rich yogurt.

Armed with the scientific ladle of statistical analysis and the culinary curiosity of a master chef, we embarked on a dairy-filled adventure that took us from the pastures of data collection to the creamy landscapes of fruitful analysis. So, grab your lab coat and a spoon, for our methodology was as rich, flavorful, and data-driven as a well-made yogurt parfait!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Yogurt consumption and Yearly Total Gross Income of US Farms. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista .

For the time period 2000 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9390802, r-squared of 0.8818717, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Culture of Yogurt: Exploring the Wheyward Connection Between Yogurt Consumption and US Farm Income

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the unexpected and downright curd-ious relationship between yogurt consumption and the yearly total gross income of US farms. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, our research team delved into the world of yogurt and farm finances to unravel this dairy dilemma. After analyzing the numbers from 2000 to 2021, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9390802 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong link between the two. So, grab a spoonful of yogurt and join us on this creamy journey as we dig into the delightful dairy science that transcends the bottom line of US farm income!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Welcome, dairy enthusiasts and financial fro-yo fanatics! Today, we embark on a journey that takes us from the creamy landscapes of yogurt consumption to the churning whirlwind of US farm income. In a dairy-related twist on the renowned "you are what you eat" adage, we are about to explore just how much "you are what you yogurt" might reveal about the economic fortunes of US farms.
The connection between yogurt and farm income may initially seem about as straightforward as finding a needle in a haystack made of cheese, yet our investigation has revealed a delightfully cheesy correlation that is not to be underestimated. While some may speculate that this link is as improbable as finding a four-leaf clover in a pasture, our data – oh-so-beautifully captured by the USDA and Statista – tells a different story.
As we delve into the delightful world of dairy and dollars, our research will unpick the intricacies of yogurt consumption, not just in terms of its gastronomic appeal, but also in relation to its potential impact on the financial fortunes of US farms. We'll be navigating through the statistical pastures, braving the treacherous terrain of correlation coefficients and p-values as we seek to separate the cream from the whey.
So, grab your lab coat and a spoonful of your favorite yogurt flavor, and join us in this study that takes us from the science lab to the barnyard – a journey where the "cultures" we'll explore are just as likely to refer to probiotics as they are to denote anthropological customs. Let's not cry over spilled milk, for this investigation is bound to be udderly enlightening and quite the "whey" to spend our time!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon analyzing the data collected from 2000 to 2021, our research team found a udderly striking correlation between yogurt consumption and the yearly total gross income of US farms. The correlation coefficient of 0.9390802 sent us into a scientific frenzy, leaving us feeling butterly amazed at the strength of the relationship. In addition, the r-squared value of 0.8818717 confirmed that a whopping 88.18% of the variability in farm income can be attributed to the consumption of this dairy delight. We were utterly whey-sted with excitement!

Oh, but wait – we haven't even mentioned the 'p' word yet! That's right, folks, the p-value was less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant connection between yogurt consumption and US farm income. It seems there's more to this relationship than meets the eye, or should we say "the taste buds"?

And now, the pièce de résistance, the star of the paper – Fig. 1. Behold, as we present to you a majestic scatterplot showing the strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's a thing of beauty, almost as appealing as a perfectly swirled cup of yogurt!

In conclusion, our findings bring to light a delightful "yogurtonomics" relationship that extends beyond the breakfast table. It's clear that the culture of yogurt may have a whey with influencing the bottom line of US farms. So, fellow enthusiasts, let's raise a spoon to the unexpected interplay between dairy consumption and economic success. This research has certainly stirred up more questions than answers and left us yearning for a deeper understanding of this dairy enigma.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Yogurt consumption and Yearly Total Gross Income of US Farms. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Culture of Yogurt: Exploring the Wheyward Connection Between Yogurt Consumption and US Farm Income

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the unexpected and downright curd-ious relationship between yogurt consumption and the yearly total gross income of US farms. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, our research team delved into the world of yogurt and farm finances to unravel this dairy dilemma. After analyzing the numbers from 2000 to 2021, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9390802 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong link between the two. So, grab a spoonful of yogurt and join us on this creamy journey as we dig into the delightful dairy science that transcends the bottom line of US farm income!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of the wheyward connection between yogurt consumption and US farm income has garnered increasing attention in recent years. Smith, et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of yogurt consumption patterns and their potential influence on agricultural economics. Their findings indicated a positive correlation between yogurt consumption per capita and the yearly total gross income of US farms, highlighting the potential impact of dairy delights on financial outcomes in the agricultural sector.
Building on this foundation, Doe and Johnson (2018) explored the contextual factors influencing yogurt consumption, shedding light on the socio-economic dynamics that intertwine with dairy product preferences. Their work elucidates the multifaceted nature of consumer behavior, emphasizing the need to consider not only the nutritional aspects but also the cultural and economic dimensions of yogurt consumption.
In "The Yogurt Economy: A Creamy Perspective" by Jones (2017), the author presents a holistic examination of the dairy industry, delving into the ramifications of yogurt market trends on agricultural revenue. The study underscores the complex interplay between consumer demand, production costs, and farm income, illustrating the intricate dance of supply and demand in the creamy marketplace.
Turning to non-fiction works with insights relevant to our investigation, Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" offers thought-provoking perspectives on food production and its economic repercussions. While not specifically focused on yogurt, Pollan's exploration of the agricultural landscape provides valuable context for understanding the broader forces at play in the food industry.
In a fictional twist, the dystopian novel "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley may seem far removed from the realm of dairy economics at first glance. However, Huxley's portrayal of a stratified society, with distinct class divisions and consumer behaviors, prompts contemplation of the societal influences on food consumption patterns and, by extension, their impact on agricultural economics.
As the literature review expanded, our research team delved into unexpected sources of insight, including the backs of random shampoo bottles, in a desperate attempt to unearth any shred of relevance to our investigation. Though the shampoo bottles offered no substantive contributions to the yogurt-farm income nexus, the endeavor did provide an amusing diversion and a newfound appreciation for the unintentional humor found in cosmetic product descriptions.


[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data collected from 2000 to 2021, our research team found a udderly striking correlation between yogurt consumption and the yearly total gross income of US farms. The correlation coefficient of 0.9390802 sent us into a scientific frenzy, leaving us feeling butterly amazed at the strength of the relationship. In addition, the r-squared value of 0.8818717 confirmed that a whopping 88.18% of the variability in farm income can be attributed to the consumption of this dairy delight. We were utterly whey-sted with excitement!
Oh, but wait – we haven't even mentioned the 'p' word yet! That's right, folks, the p-value was less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant connection between yogurt consumption and US farm income. It seems there's more to this relationship than meets the eye, or should we say "the taste buds"?
And now, the pièce de résistance, the star of the paper – Fig. 1. Behold, as we present to you a majestic scatterplot showing the strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's a thing of beauty, almost as appealing as a perfectly swirled cup of yogurt!
In conclusion, our findings bring to light a delightful "yogurtonomics" relationship that extends beyond the breakfast table. It's clear that the culture of yogurt may have a whey with influencing the bottom line of US farms. So, fellow enthusiasts, let's raise a spoon to the unexpected interplay between dairy consumption and economic success. This research has certainly stirred up more questions than answers and left us yearning for a deeper understanding of this dairy enigma.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings not only curd-ify, but also churn up the existing research on the correlation between yogurt consumption and US farm income. The results not only support previous works by Smith, et al. and Doe and Johnson but also shed light on the unexpected potency of this connection. It's clear that the yogurt-farm income link isn't just a dairy tale; it's a statistical and economic reality.

The staggering correlation coefficient we uncovered sends a clear signal – the whey in which yogurt consumption affects farm income is undeniably strong. It's almost like a symbiotic relationship, where the prosperity of one relies on the creaminess of the other. The r-squared value of 0.8818717 further emphasizes the udderly compelling nature of this connection, demonstrating that a large chunk of the variation in farm income can be attributed to yogurt consumption. It's moo-ving, really.

The significance of the p-value less than 0.01 can't be overlooked. It's not just a statistical nuance; it's a nod to the robustness of this relationship. It's as if statistics itself is saying, "Hey, this yogurt-farm income thing isn't just a fluke – it's a real, meaningful association."

Our scatterplot, that masterpiece of visual representation, captures the essence of this unexpected correlation. It's like a Picasso painting, with yogurt consumption and farm income beautifully intertwined in a way no one could have imagined. It's a reminder that sometimes the most unexpected pairings – like peanut butter and jelly, or salted caramel and ice cream – can create the most satisfying outcomes.

So, where do we go from here? One might say we need to dig deeper into the creamy layers of yogurt consumption and its ramifications on the agricultural economy. This study has merely scratched the surface of the yogurt-farm income connection. It's time to bring in the big scoops of data analysis, a dollop of behavioral economics, and perhaps a sprinkle of qualitative research to truly understand the nuances of this dairy enigma.

The culture of yogurt, it seems, extends far beyond the breakfast bowl and into the very fabric of economic success. As we ponder the implications of this unexpected association, let's not forget to raise a spoon to the delicious interplay between dairy and economics. It's a reminder that in the world of research, just like in the world of flavor combinations, sometimes the most unexpected pairings yield the most intriguing results.

In light of our dairy-affirming findings, we must acknowledge that this research has left us hungry for more – not just for yogurt but also for a deeper understanding of the creamy influences on the agricultural landscape. As our investigation continues, we're excited to uncover more dairy revelations and, perhaps, milk this connection for all it's worth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Yogurt consumption and Yearly Total Gross Income of US Farms. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Culture of Yogurt: Exploring the Wheyward Connection Between Yogurt Consumption and US Farm Income

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper explores the unexpected and downright curd-ious relationship between yogurt consumption and the yearly total gross income of US farms. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, our research team delved into the world of yogurt and farm finances to unravel this dairy dilemma. After analyzing the numbers from 2000 to 2021, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9390802 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong link between the two. So, grab a spoonful of yogurt and join us on this creamy journey as we dig into the delightful dairy science that transcends the bottom line of US farm income!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Welcome, dairy enthusiasts and financial fro-yo fanatics! Today, we embark on a journey that takes us from the creamy landscapes of yogurt consumption to the churning whirlwind of US farm income. In a dairy-related twist on the renowned "you are what you eat" adage, we are about to explore just how much "you are what you yogurt" might reveal about the economic fortunes of US farms.
The connection between yogurt and farm income may initially seem about as straightforward as finding a needle in a haystack made of cheese, yet our investigation has revealed a delightfully cheesy correlation that is not to be underestimated. While some may speculate that this link is as improbable as finding a four-leaf clover in a pasture, our data – oh-so-beautifully captured by the USDA and Statista – tells a different story.
As we delve into the delightful world of dairy and dollars, our research will unpick the intricacies of yogurt consumption, not just in terms of its gastronomic appeal, but also in relation to its potential impact on the financial fortunes of US farms. We'll be navigating through the statistical pastures, braving the treacherous terrain of correlation coefficients and p-values as we seek to separate the cream from the whey.
So, grab your lab coat and a spoonful of your favorite yogurt flavor, and join us in this study that takes us from the science lab to the barnyard – a journey where the "cultures" we'll explore are just as likely to refer to probiotics as they are to denote anthropological customs. Let's not cry over spilled milk, for this investigation is bound to be udderly enlightening and quite the "whey" to spend our time!

[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data collected from 2000 to 2021, our research team found a udderly striking correlation between yogurt consumption and the yearly total gross income of US farms. The correlation coefficient of 0.9390802 sent us into a scientific frenzy, leaving us feeling butterly amazed at the strength of the relationship. In addition, the r-squared value of 0.8818717 confirmed that a whopping 88.18% of the variability in farm income can be attributed to the consumption of this dairy delight. We were utterly whey-sted with excitement!
Oh, but wait – we haven't even mentioned the 'p' word yet! That's right, folks, the p-value was less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant connection between yogurt consumption and US farm income. It seems there's more to this relationship than meets the eye, or should we say "the taste buds"?
And now, the pièce de résistance, the star of the paper – Fig. 1. Behold, as we present to you a majestic scatterplot showing the strong correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. It's a thing of beauty, almost as appealing as a perfectly swirled cup of yogurt!
In conclusion, our findings bring to light a delightful "yogurtonomics" relationship that extends beyond the breakfast table. It's clear that the culture of yogurt may have a whey with influencing the bottom line of US farms. So, fellow enthusiasts, let's raise a spoon to the unexpected interplay between dairy consumption and economic success. This research has certainly stirred up more questions than answers and left us yearning for a deeper understanding of this dairy enigma.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In wrapping up our dairy-licious investigation into the intriguing connection between yogurt consumption and US farm income, it's clear that this research has churned up some udderly fascinating findings. The strong correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value have left us feeling like we've stumbled upon the cream of the crop in terms of unexpected relationships. It's safe to say that the evidence supports the idea that a spoonful of yogurt might indeed have the whey to positively impact the yearly total gross income of US farms.

As we bid adieu to this yogurt-yielding adventure, it's worth noting that our results have not only unveiled an unexpected connection but also sparked a surge of curiosity in the wonderful world of "yogurtonomics." While our analysis has been fruitful, we dare say there’s no need for further research in this area – we’ve whipped up quite the tasty conclusion, and we wouldn’t want to milk this topic dry!

So, let's raise a proverbial spoon to the marvelous mysteries of yogurt, where the creamy cultures of science and economics intertwine to create a flavor-packed journey that's simply "gouda" be true. And remember, when it comes to unlocking the dairy secrets of economic success, sometimes the proof really is in the pudding – or in this case, the yogurt!



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Culture of Yogurt: Exploring the Wheyward Connection Between Yogurt Consumption and US Farm Income. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Probiotic Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Culture of Yogurt: Exploring the Wheyward Connection Between Yogurt Consumption and US Farm Income. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Probiotic Research and Culinary Advancement


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Culture of Yogurt: Exploring the Wheyward Connection Between Yogurt Consumption and US Farm Income with an abstract of This paper explores the unexpected and downright curd-ious relationship between yogurt consumption and the yearly total gross income of US farms. Utilizing data from the USDA and Statista, our research team delved into the world of yogurt and farm finances to unravel this dairy dilemma. After analyzing the numbers from 2000 to 2021, we discovered a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9390802 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong link between the two. So, grab a spoonful of yogurt and join us on this creamy journey as we dig into the delightful dairy science that transcends the bottom line of US farm income!

ChatGPT:

yogurt consumption, US farm income, dairy industry, agricultural economics, dairy products, USDA data, Statista, correlation coefficient, farm finances, farm profitability, dairy science

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Yogurt consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Yogurt in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Yogurt consumption

Yearly Total Gross Income of US Farms
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Yearly Total Gross Income of US Farms

Correlation r = 0.9390802 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8818717 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Yearly Total Gross Income of US Farms) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Yogurt consumption) over the 22 years from 2000 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.9E-11. 0.0000000000986795235598673700
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 9.9E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 10,133,814,635 random variables You don't actually need 10 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.86, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Yogurt consumption (Pounds per person)6.5788.69.210.311.111.611.712.513.413.61414.914.914.413.713.713.613.413.614.3
Yearly Total Gross Income of US Farms (Billion USD)241.7249.9230.6258.7294.9298.5290.2339.6377.7343.3365.6420.4449.8483.8483.1440.8412.3425.4424.9427.7452.2513.2




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6.5,7,8,8.6,9.2,10.3,11.1,11.6,11.7,12.5,13.4,13.6,14,14.9,14.9,14.4,13.7,13.7,13.6,13.4,13.6,14.3,])
array_2 = np.array([241.7,249.9,230.6,258.7,294.9,298.5,290.2,339.6,377.7,343.3,365.6,420.4,449.8,483.8,483.1,440.8,412.3,425.4,424.9,427.7,452.2,513.2,])
array_1_name = "Yogurt consumption"
array_2_name = "Yearly Total Gross Income of US Farms"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 1453 · Black Variable ID: 568 · Red Variable ID: 294
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0