Report an error
Yearly Total Gross Income of US Farms correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Number of Public Library Members in the UK | r=0.98 | 12yrs | No |
Google searches for 'who is the doctor' | r=0.97 | 19yrs | Yes! |
Petroluem consumption in Morocco | r=0.95 | 22yrs | No |
Inflation in the US | r=0.95 | 23yrs | No |
Yogurt consumption | r=0.94 | 22yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Violet | r=0.92 | 23yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Romeo | r=0.91 | 23yrs | No |
Chipotle Mexican Grill's stock price (CMG) | r=0.88 | 16yrs | No |
US household spending on eggs | r=0.8 | 23yrs | No |
The number of actuaries in Minnesota | r=0.79 | 20yrs | No |
Yearly Total Gross Income of US Farms also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)