Download png, svg
AI explanation
Every time someone named Franklin tuned in to watch, they couldn't help but laugh at all the puns and dad jokes, creating a subconscious laugh track that boosted the ratings. Additionally, the influx of Franklins sparked a new fan theory that the show was secretly an allegory for Benjamin Franklin's life, leading to renewed interest and speculation. The name Franklin just had a magnetic pull on the success of the show, like a quirky sitcom magnet.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that reflects the vibe of a TIME magazine cover, featuring a bustling coffee shop scene. The scene should show a group of people congregating around a vibrant coffee shop adorned with a prominent sign reading "FRANKLIN" in captivating typography. In the background, include a television screen displaying the popular sitcom "Two and a Half Men," with a visible high star rating next to it. The people and surroundings should radiate an animated, lively atmosphere. Emphasize the energetic and diverse nature of the crowd, as well as the warm and inviting ambiance of the coffee shop. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Franklin and Season rating of "Two and a Half Men". Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Low poly A TIME magazine cover image Parallax art An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Celtic art
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Franklin and Season rating of "Two and a Half Men" together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the scene, a group of people gather around a coffee shop, with a large sign displaying the name "FRANKLIN" in bold letters. Meanwhile, in the background, a tv screen shows a popular sitcom "Two and a Half Men", with a high star rating displayed next to it.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In the scene, a group of people gather around a coffee shop, with a large sign displaying the name "FRANKLIN" in bold letters. Meanwhile, in the background, a tv screen shows a popular sitcom "Two and a Half Men", with a high star rating displayed next to it. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that reflects the vibe of a TIME magazine cover, featuring a bustling coffee shop scene. The scene should show a group of people congregating around a vibrant coffee shop adorned with a prominent sign reading "FRANKLIN" in captivating typography. In the background, include a television screen displaying the popular sitcom "Two and a Half Men," with a visible high star rating next to it. The people and surroundings should radiate an animated, lively atmosphere. Emphasize the energetic and diverse nature of the crowd, as well as the warm and inviting ambiance of the coffee shop.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Franklin caused Season rating of "Two and a Half Men" to increase. Make it feel plausible.
AI academic paper
Franklin, My Dear Watson: Exploring the Fickle Nature of Names and TV Fame in 'Two and a Half Men' Season Ratings The Journal of Pop Culture and Statistical Analysis Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Franklin and Season rating of "Two and a Half Men". Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8153372 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2015.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Franklin, My Dear Watson: Exploring the Fickle Nature of Names and TV Fame in 'Two and a Half Men' Season Ratings"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar and surprisingly intertwined world of first names and television ratings, focusing specifically on the perplexing correlation between the popularity of the name "Franklin" and the seasonal fortunes of the sitcom "Two and a Half Men." Taking a lighthearted and pun-filled approach, we utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia to explore this unusual relationship.
Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8153372, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2015. These statistical results not only shed light on the whims of naming trends but also provide food for thought on the unpredictable nature of TV show popularity. So, grab your data goggles and buckle up for an entertaining journey through the somewhat zany world of names and ratings!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Franklin and Season rating of "Two and a Half Men". Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Franklin, My Dear Watson: Exploring the Fickle Nature of Names and TV Fame in 'Two and a Half Men' Season Ratings"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar and surprisingly intertwined world of first names and television ratings, focusing specifically on the perplexing correlation between the popularity of the name "Franklin" and the seasonal fortunes of the sitcom "Two and a Half Men." Taking a lighthearted and pun-filled approach, we utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia to explore this unusual relationship.
Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8153372, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2015. These statistical results not only shed light on the whims of naming trends but also provide food for thought on the unpredictable nature of TV show popularity. So, grab your data goggles and buckle up for an entertaining journey through the somewhat zany world of names and ratings!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION
“What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet,” mused Shakespeare's Juliet. Well, Juliet, the scent of a rose might not change, but the popularity of a name certainly seems to have some amusing, if not confounding, effects on the world around us. In this paper, we embark on a delightfully odd journey into the realms of nomenclature and primetime television to uncover the surprising relationship between the first name "Franklin" and the roller coaster fortunes of the sitcom "Two and a Half Men."
The choice of a name is a reflection of individual and cultural trends, often influenced by a kaleidoscope of factors, including historical events, celebrity endorsements, and, in the case of the 1970s, perhaps questionable fashion choices. Meanwhile, TV audiences are a capricious lot, whose preferences and whims can sway the fortunes of a show faster than you can say "binge-watching." Merge these two seemingly disconnected worlds, and you find yourself amidst an uproarious and somewhat mind-boggling expedition, fueled by equal parts data and a penchant for the unexpected.
Our study sets out to examine the statistical relationship between the popularity of the name "Franklin," as documented by the US Social Security Administration, and the seasonal ratings of "Two and a Half Men," as compiled from the authoritative amphitheater that is Wikipedia. While the interplay between personal names and primetime entertainment may seem as tangential as a subplot in a sitcom, our findings provide an exuberantly enlightening insight into the capricious nature of cultural phenomena.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts as we embark on this rollicking, pun-laden investigation into the enigmatic intersection of nomenclature and Nielsen ratings. Let us journey into the labyrinthine world where the popularity of a name can make or break a TV show, and where statistical analyses are infused with a sprinkle of whimsy and a dash of the unexpected.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Franklin and Season rating of "Two and a Half Men". Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Franklin, My Dear Watson: Exploring the Fickle Nature of Names and TV Fame in 'Two and a Half Men' Season Ratings"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar and surprisingly intertwined world of first names and television ratings, focusing specifically on the perplexing correlation between the popularity of the name "Franklin" and the seasonal fortunes of the sitcom "Two and a Half Men." Taking a lighthearted and pun-filled approach, we utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia to explore this unusual relationship.
Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8153372, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2015. These statistical results not only shed light on the whims of naming trends but also provide food for thought on the unpredictable nature of TV show popularity. So, grab your data goggles and buckle up for an entertaining journey through the somewhat zany world of names and ratings!
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
“What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet,” mused Shakespeare's Juliet. Well, Juliet, the scent of a rose might not change, but the popularity of a name certainly seems to have some amusing, if not confounding, effects on the world around us. In this paper, we embark on a delightfully odd journey into the realms of nomenclature and primetime television to uncover the surprising relationship between the first name "Franklin" and the roller coaster fortunes of the sitcom "Two and a Half Men."
The choice of a name is a reflection of individual and cultural trends, often influenced by a kaleidoscope of factors, including historical events, celebrity endorsements, and, in the case of the 1970s, perhaps questionable fashion choices. Meanwhile, TV audiences are a capricious lot, whose preferences and whims can sway the fortunes of a show faster than you can say "binge-watching." Merge these two seemingly disconnected worlds, and you find yourself amidst an uproarious and somewhat mind-boggling expedition, fueled by equal parts data and a penchant for the unexpected.
Our study sets out to examine the statistical relationship between the popularity of the name "Franklin," as documented by the US Social Security Administration, and the seasonal ratings of "Two and a Half Men," as compiled from the authoritative amphitheater that is Wikipedia. While the interplay between personal names and primetime entertainment may seem as tangential as a subplot in a sitcom, our findings provide an exuberantly enlightening insight into the capricious nature of cultural phenomena.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts as we embark on this rollicking, pun-laden investigation into the enigmatic intersection of nomenclature and Nielsen ratings. Let us journey into the labyrinthine world where the popularity of a name can make or break a TV show, and where statistical analyses are infused with a sprinkle of whimsy and a dash of the unexpected.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of names and their impact on various societal phenomena has long captivated researchers, from the works of Smith and Doe to the more recent investigations by Jones and Johnson. Delving into the fascinating interplay between nomenclature and cultural phenomena, these studies have provided valuable insights into the influence of names on individual behavior, social dynamics, and even professional success. However, as we plunge into the peculiar realm of television ratings and first names, we find ourselves navigating a landscape as unpredictable and whimsical as the plot twists of a soap opera.
In "The Name Game: Deciphering the Subconscious Influences of Nomenclature," Smith et al. explore the psychological implications of given names, shedding light on the profound impact of nomenclature on personal identity and social interactions. Meanwhile, Doe's "The Surprising Significance of Surnames" offers a comprehensive analysis of the historical and cultural implications of family names, underscoring the intricate web of associations that names weave within society. Building on these foundations, Jones' seminal work "The Power of a Name: A Sociocultural Perspective" delves into the multifaceted nature of names as conduits of meaning, influence, and societal representation.
Turning our attention to more pop culture-focused literature, "The Encyclopedia of TV Show Ratings and Trivia" uncovers the idiosyncratic factors that can sway the fate of television programs, drawing attention to the enigmatic dance between viewer preferences and ratings success. In a similar vein, "The Hollywood Effect: Celebrity Culture and Its Impact on Television" offers a captivating exploration of how celebrity endorsements and cultural phenomena interlace with television programming, providing a tantalizing backdrop for our investigation.
As we veer into the more whimsical side of literary indulgence, the works of fiction must not be overlooked. Take, for instance, the fictional works "The Name Whisperer" by A. Novel and "Ratings Rhapsody" by P. Enthusiast. While these may not be academically rigorous sources, their themes of nomenclature and television ratings lend a jocular perspective to our scholarly discourse.
In a tangentially related sphere, the cinematic arts have also provided a source of inspiration. "The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus" and "Shakespeare in Love" are not only entertaining diversions but also offer subtle reflections on the fluid nature of identity and the capricious whims of public acclaim, serving as unwittingly apropos parallels to our investigation.
The literature presents a rich tapestry of insights into the influence of names and cultural phenomena, setting the stage for our delightful romp through the fickle cosmos of Franklin and "Two and a Half Men." So, fasten your seatbelts, dear reader, for the laughter and puns are only just beginning!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Franklin and Season rating of "Two and a Half Men". Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia . You used data from 2004 to 2015
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Franklin, My Dear Watson: Exploring the Fickle Nature of Names and TV Fame in 'Two and a Half Men' Season Ratings"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar and surprisingly intertwined world of first names and television ratings, focusing specifically on the perplexing correlation between the popularity of the name "Franklin" and the seasonal fortunes of the sitcom "Two and a Half Men." Taking a lighthearted and pun-filled approach, we utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia to explore this unusual relationship.
Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8153372, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2015. These statistical results not only shed light on the whims of naming trends but also provide food for thought on the unpredictable nature of TV show popularity. So, grab your data goggles and buckle up for an entertaining journey through the somewhat zany world of names and ratings!
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
“What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet,” mused Shakespeare's Juliet. Well, Juliet, the scent of a rose might not change, but the popularity of a name certainly seems to have some amusing, if not confounding, effects on the world around us. In this paper, we embark on a delightfully odd journey into the realms of nomenclature and primetime television to uncover the surprising relationship between the first name "Franklin" and the roller coaster fortunes of the sitcom "Two and a Half Men."
The choice of a name is a reflection of individual and cultural trends, often influenced by a kaleidoscope of factors, including historical events, celebrity endorsements, and, in the case of the 1970s, perhaps questionable fashion choices. Meanwhile, TV audiences are a capricious lot, whose preferences and whims can sway the fortunes of a show faster than you can say "binge-watching." Merge these two seemingly disconnected worlds, and you find yourself amidst an uproarious and somewhat mind-boggling expedition, fueled by equal parts data and a penchant for the unexpected.
Our study sets out to examine the statistical relationship between the popularity of the name "Franklin," as documented by the US Social Security Administration, and the seasonal ratings of "Two and a Half Men," as compiled from the authoritative amphitheater that is Wikipedia. While the interplay between personal names and primetime entertainment may seem as tangential as a subplot in a sitcom, our findings provide an exuberantly enlightening insight into the capricious nature of cultural phenomena.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts as we embark on this rollicking, pun-laden investigation into the enigmatic intersection of nomenclature and Nielsen ratings. Let us journey into the labyrinthine world where the popularity of a name can make or break a TV show, and where statistical analyses are infused with a sprinkle of whimsy and a dash of the unexpected.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
METHODOLOGY
Data Collection:
We began our merry odyssey by scouring the vast and wondrous expanses of the internet for data on the popularity of the name "Franklin" and the ratings of the sitcom "Two and a Half Men." After battling through hordes of memes, cat videos, and uncharted corners of the web, we stumbled upon the treasure troves of the US Social Security Administration and the hallowed halls of Wikipedia. These veritable repositories of knowledge provided us with the numerical chronicles of the name "Franklin's" popularity, and the winding narrative of "Two and a Half Men's" seasonal ratings, from the voyages of 2004 to 2015.
Data Analysis:
With our trusty abacus in hand and a plenitude of caffeinated beverages at the ready, we meticulously tabulated and cross-referenced the data from these sources. Our analytical foray involved calculating the correlation coefficient between the occurrences of the name "Franklin" and the seasonal ratings of "Two and a Half Men" using complex statistical techniques that would rival the enigmatic machinations of a sitcom plot twist.
Statistical Tests:
We subjected our data to rigorous statistical scrutiny, unleashing the formidable powers of correlation analysis. Relying on the hallowed traditions of Pearson's correlation coefficient, we sought to uncover the intertwined destinies of the name "Franklin" and the televised escapades of Charlie, Alan, and the infamous half-man. With bated breath and caffeinated nerves, we diligently crunched the numbers, eagerly anticipating the revelations that lay beyond the tumultuous mists of statistical significance.
Limitations:
As with all grand adventures, our noble quest was not without its inherent perils and limitations. The data we collected and analyzed were from specific time periods, and may not encompass the full breadth of naming trends and television viewership behavior. Additionally, our lighthearted approach, though undoubtedly charming, may have introduced an element of whimsy into our analyses, potentially influencing the outcomes in unexpected ways.
In conclusion, our intrepid journey through the labyrinthine landscapes of nomenclature and television ratings has led us to a striking revelation: the popularity of the name "Franklin" and the seasonal ratings of "Two and a Half Men" are bound together by a mysterious and statistically significant correlation. With our data-driven compass in hand and a glint of statistical wonder in our eyes, we eagerly present our findings in the hopes of shedding light on the hilariously perplexing relationship between names and TV fame. Let the data dance, and the laughter commence!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Franklin and Season rating of "Two and a Half Men". Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia .
For the time period 2004 to 2015, you found a correlation 0.8153372, r-squared of 0.6647748, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Franklin, My Dear Watson: Exploring the Fickle Nature of Names and TV Fame in 'Two and a Half Men' Season Ratings"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar and surprisingly intertwined world of first names and television ratings, focusing specifically on the perplexing correlation between the popularity of the name "Franklin" and the seasonal fortunes of the sitcom "Two and a Half Men." Taking a lighthearted and pun-filled approach, we utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia to explore this unusual relationship.
Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8153372, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2015. These statistical results not only shed light on the whims of naming trends but also provide food for thought on the unpredictable nature of TV show popularity. So, grab your data goggles and buckle up for an entertaining journey through the somewhat zany world of names and ratings!
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
“What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet,” mused Shakespeare's Juliet. Well, Juliet, the scent of a rose might not change, but the popularity of a name certainly seems to have some amusing, if not confounding, effects on the world around us. In this paper, we embark on a delightfully odd journey into the realms of nomenclature and primetime television to uncover the surprising relationship between the first name "Franklin" and the roller coaster fortunes of the sitcom "Two and a Half Men."
The choice of a name is a reflection of individual and cultural trends, often influenced by a kaleidoscope of factors, including historical events, celebrity endorsements, and, in the case of the 1970s, perhaps questionable fashion choices. Meanwhile, TV audiences are a capricious lot, whose preferences and whims can sway the fortunes of a show faster than you can say "binge-watching." Merge these two seemingly disconnected worlds, and you find yourself amidst an uproarious and somewhat mind-boggling expedition, fueled by equal parts data and a penchant for the unexpected.
Our study sets out to examine the statistical relationship between the popularity of the name "Franklin," as documented by the US Social Security Administration, and the seasonal ratings of "Two and a Half Men," as compiled from the authoritative amphitheater that is Wikipedia. While the interplay between personal names and primetime entertainment may seem as tangential as a subplot in a sitcom, our findings provide an exuberantly enlightening insight into the capricious nature of cultural phenomena.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts as we embark on this rollicking, pun-laden investigation into the enigmatic intersection of nomenclature and Nielsen ratings. Let us journey into the labyrinthine world where the popularity of a name can make or break a TV show, and where statistical analyses are infused with a sprinkle of whimsy and a dash of the unexpected.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis performed on the data revealed a noteworthy relationship between the popularity of the first name "Franklin" and the seasonal ratings of the television show "Two and a Half Men." The correlation coefficient of 0.8153372 indicates a strong positive correlation between these two seemingly unrelated entities, suggesting a surprisingly intertwined destiny that even the show's characters might find bewildering.
This remarkable correlation, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.6647748, indicates that approximately 66.48% of the variability in the seasonal ratings of "Two and a Half Men" can be explained by the popularity of the name "Franklin." It appears that dear Franklin wields far more influence over sitcom ratings than previously imagined – move over, Charlie Harper, there's a new star in town!
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed relationship between the name "Franklin" and the show's ratings is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. This discovery raises exciting questions about the impact of personal nomenclature on cultural phenomena, leaving us pondering the profound influence of names in the labyrinth of entertainment dynamics.
As a visual representation of this compelling correlation, Figure 1 presents a scatterplot showcasing the striking relationship between the popularity of the name "Franklin" and the seasonal ratings of "Two and a Half Men." The graph illustrates a clear and pronounced trend, with each data point adding to the whimsical saga of how a name can potentially sway the fate of a television show.
In conclusion, our findings not only underscore the rather unexpected correlation between personal names and television ratings but also add a dash of intrigue and humor to the often stately realm of statistical analyses. It seems that in the realm of entertainment, the name "Franklin" holds more sway than we ever dared to imagine. So, as we navigate the serendipitous seas of social science, let us not overlook the transformative power of naming conventions amid the mirth and madness of it all.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Franklin and Season rating of "Two and a Half Men". Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
"Franklin, My Dear Watson: Exploring the Fickle Nature of Names and TV Fame in 'Two and a Half Men' Season Ratings"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar and surprisingly intertwined world of first names and television ratings, focusing specifically on the perplexing correlation between the popularity of the name "Franklin" and the seasonal fortunes of the sitcom "Two and a Half Men." Taking a lighthearted and pun-filled approach, we utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia to explore this unusual relationship.
Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8153372, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2015. These statistical results not only shed light on the whims of naming trends but also provide food for thought on the unpredictable nature of TV show popularity. So, grab your data goggles and buckle up for an entertaining journey through the somewhat zany world of names and ratings!
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of names and their impact on various societal phenomena has long captivated researchers, from the works of Smith and Doe to the more recent investigations by Jones and Johnson. Delving into the fascinating interplay between nomenclature and cultural phenomena, these studies have provided valuable insights into the influence of names on individual behavior, social dynamics, and even professional success. However, as we plunge into the peculiar realm of television ratings and first names, we find ourselves navigating a landscape as unpredictable and whimsical as the plot twists of a soap opera.
In "The Name Game: Deciphering the Subconscious Influences of Nomenclature," Smith et al. explore the psychological implications of given names, shedding light on the profound impact of nomenclature on personal identity and social interactions. Meanwhile, Doe's "The Surprising Significance of Surnames" offers a comprehensive analysis of the historical and cultural implications of family names, underscoring the intricate web of associations that names weave within society. Building on these foundations, Jones' seminal work "The Power of a Name: A Sociocultural Perspective" delves into the multifaceted nature of names as conduits of meaning, influence, and societal representation.
Turning our attention to more pop culture-focused literature, "The Encyclopedia of TV Show Ratings and Trivia" uncovers the idiosyncratic factors that can sway the fate of television programs, drawing attention to the enigmatic dance between viewer preferences and ratings success. In a similar vein, "The Hollywood Effect: Celebrity Culture and Its Impact on Television" offers a captivating exploration of how celebrity endorsements and cultural phenomena interlace with television programming, providing a tantalizing backdrop for our investigation.
As we veer into the more whimsical side of literary indulgence, the works of fiction must not be overlooked. Take, for instance, the fictional works "The Name Whisperer" by A. Novel and "Ratings Rhapsody" by P. Enthusiast. While these may not be academically rigorous sources, their themes of nomenclature and television ratings lend a jocular perspective to our scholarly discourse.
In a tangentially related sphere, the cinematic arts have also provided a source of inspiration. "The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus" and "Shakespeare in Love" are not only entertaining diversions but also offer subtle reflections on the fluid nature of identity and the capricious whims of public acclaim, serving as unwittingly apropos parallels to our investigation.
The literature presents a rich tapestry of insights into the influence of names and cultural phenomena, setting the stage for our delightful romp through the fickle cosmos of Franklin and "Two and a Half Men." So, fasten your seatbelts, dear reader, for the laughter and puns are only just beginning!
[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis performed on the data revealed a noteworthy relationship between the popularity of the first name "Franklin" and the seasonal ratings of the television show "Two and a Half Men." The correlation coefficient of 0.8153372 indicates a strong positive correlation between these two seemingly unrelated entities, suggesting a surprisingly intertwined destiny that even the show's characters might find bewildering.
This remarkable correlation, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.6647748, indicates that approximately 66.48% of the variability in the seasonal ratings of "Two and a Half Men" can be explained by the popularity of the name "Franklin." It appears that dear Franklin wields far more influence over sitcom ratings than previously imagined – move over, Charlie Harper, there's a new star in town!
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed relationship between the name "Franklin" and the show's ratings is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. This discovery raises exciting questions about the impact of personal nomenclature on cultural phenomena, leaving us pondering the profound influence of names in the labyrinth of entertainment dynamics.
As a visual representation of this compelling correlation, Figure 1 presents a scatterplot showcasing the striking relationship between the popularity of the name "Franklin" and the seasonal ratings of "Two and a Half Men." The graph illustrates a clear and pronounced trend, with each data point adding to the whimsical saga of how a name can potentially sway the fate of a television show.
In conclusion, our findings not only underscore the rather unexpected correlation between personal names and television ratings but also add a dash of intrigue and humor to the often stately realm of statistical analyses. It seems that in the realm of entertainment, the name "Franklin" holds more sway than we ever dared to imagine. So, as we navigate the serendipitous seas of social science, let us not overlook the transformative power of naming conventions amid the mirth and madness of it all.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The far-reaching influence of first names on societal phenomena has been illuminated by various studies, from the psychological implications of given names to the historical and cultural associations of family names. Our investigation into the connection between the popularity of the first name "Franklin" and the seasonal ratings of "Two and a Half Men" has ventured into the ebullient and somewhat zany universe where names and television ratings intersect.
In a nod to the whimsical nature of the literature reviewed, we set out to examine how the fickle popularity of the name "Franklin" might affect the ebbs and flows of a beloved television sitcom. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8153372 that emerged from our analysis, combined with the pun-drenched allusions to the capricious dynamics of naming trends, lends empirical credence to the merry musings found in the fictional works "The Name Whisperer" by A. Novel and "Ratings Rhapsody" by P. Enthusiast. The discovery of this surprisingly intertwined destiny between the name "Franklin" and "Two and a Half Men" offers a refreshing slant to the ever-serious realm of statistical investigation.
Our findings corroborate the speculative jests of spectators and armchair critics alike, who, perhaps unknowingly, intuited the whimsical odyssey of first names and sitcom ratings. Like a witty retort in a convoluted plotline, the p-value of less than 0.01 delivers a resounding punchline, refuting the null hypothesis and underscoring the improbable nature of this correlation. Indeed, it appears that behind the facade of entertainment dynamics lies a nuanced tale of nomenclature's influence, full of twist and turns akin to a Shakespearean comedy.
The r-squared value of 0.6647748 reveals that approximately 66.48% of the variability in the seasonal ratings of "Two and a Half Men" can be attributed to the popularity of the name "Franklin." Such a revelation paves the way for a more enchanting narrative of the tumultuous tides of television fame, where the moniker "Franklin" emerges as an unconventional protagonist, capable of shaping the destiny of a beloved sitcom. With each data point in our scatterplot adding to the whimsical saga, it is evident that dear Franklin wields a more profound influence over television ratings than we ever imagined, asserting his presence in the pantheon of popular culture alongside the likes of Charlie Harper.
As we navigate the transformative power of naming conventions amid the mirth and madness of it all, it becomes increasingly clear that the seemingly incongruous domains of nomenclature and television ratings are more entwined than one might expect. Our research adds a dash of intrigue and humor to the stately realm of statistical analyses, prompting a reimagining of the cultural reverberations of first names. So, dear reader, let us pause momentarily in this scholarly discourse and revel in the delightful romp through the capricious cosmos of Franklin and "Two and a Half Men."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Franklin and Season rating of "Two and a Half Men". Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Franklin, My Dear Watson: Exploring the Fickle Nature of Names and TV Fame in 'Two and a Half Men' Season Ratings"
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the peculiar and surprisingly intertwined world of first names and television ratings, focusing specifically on the perplexing correlation between the popularity of the name "Franklin" and the seasonal fortunes of the sitcom "Two and a Half Men." Taking a lighthearted and pun-filled approach, we utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia to explore this unusual relationship.
Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8153372, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2015. These statistical results not only shed light on the whims of naming trends but also provide food for thought on the unpredictable nature of TV show popularity. So, grab your data goggles and buckle up for an entertaining journey through the somewhat zany world of names and ratings!
[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
“What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet,” mused Shakespeare's Juliet. Well, Juliet, the scent of a rose might not change, but the popularity of a name certainly seems to have some amusing, if not confounding, effects on the world around us. In this paper, we embark on a delightfully odd journey into the realms of nomenclature and primetime television to uncover the surprising relationship between the first name "Franklin" and the roller coaster fortunes of the sitcom "Two and a Half Men."
The choice of a name is a reflection of individual and cultural trends, often influenced by a kaleidoscope of factors, including historical events, celebrity endorsements, and, in the case of the 1970s, perhaps questionable fashion choices. Meanwhile, TV audiences are a capricious lot, whose preferences and whims can sway the fortunes of a show faster than you can say "binge-watching." Merge these two seemingly disconnected worlds, and you find yourself amidst an uproarious and somewhat mind-boggling expedition, fueled by equal parts data and a penchant for the unexpected.
Our study sets out to examine the statistical relationship between the popularity of the name "Franklin," as documented by the US Social Security Administration, and the seasonal ratings of "Two and a Half Men," as compiled from the authoritative amphitheater that is Wikipedia. While the interplay between personal names and primetime entertainment may seem as tangential as a subplot in a sitcom, our findings provide an exuberantly enlightening insight into the capricious nature of cultural phenomena.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelts as we embark on this rollicking, pun-laden investigation into the enigmatic intersection of nomenclature and Nielsen ratings. Let us journey into the labyrinthine world where the popularity of a name can make or break a TV show, and where statistical analyses are infused with a sprinkle of whimsy and a dash of the unexpected.
[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis performed on the data revealed a noteworthy relationship between the popularity of the first name "Franklin" and the seasonal ratings of the television show "Two and a Half Men." The correlation coefficient of 0.8153372 indicates a strong positive correlation between these two seemingly unrelated entities, suggesting a surprisingly intertwined destiny that even the show's characters might find bewildering.
This remarkable correlation, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.6647748, indicates that approximately 66.48% of the variability in the seasonal ratings of "Two and a Half Men" can be explained by the popularity of the name "Franklin." It appears that dear Franklin wields far more influence over sitcom ratings than previously imagined – move over, Charlie Harper, there's a new star in town!
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed relationship between the name "Franklin" and the show's ratings is unlikely to have occurred by mere chance. This discovery raises exciting questions about the impact of personal nomenclature on cultural phenomena, leaving us pondering the profound influence of names in the labyrinth of entertainment dynamics.
As a visual representation of this compelling correlation, Figure 1 presents a scatterplot showcasing the striking relationship between the popularity of the name "Franklin" and the seasonal ratings of "Two and a Half Men." The graph illustrates a clear and pronounced trend, with each data point adding to the whimsical saga of how a name can potentially sway the fate of a television show.
In conclusion, our findings not only underscore the rather unexpected correlation between personal names and television ratings but also add a dash of intrigue and humor to the often stately realm of statistical analyses. It seems that in the realm of entertainment, the name "Franklin" holds more sway than we ever dared to imagine. So, as we navigate the serendipitous seas of social science, let us not overlook the transformative power of naming conventions amid the mirth and madness of it all.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
CONCLUSION
In the immortal words of Shakespeare, "What's in a name?" Well, according to our statistical foray into the labyrinthine world of nomenclature and Nielsen ratings, the name "Franklin" seems to wield surprising clout over the seasonal fortunes of "Two and a Half Men." Our data has uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8153372 that not only defies easy explanation but also invites a myriad of quips about how Franklin becomes the true 'man' of the show!
Our findings suggest that the impact of a first name on the success of a TV series might be far more profound than previously thought. One might even venture to say that Franklin has become the unassuming yet formidable protagonist of this sitcom saga, usurping the spotlight from more traditional stars. Who would have thought that a single name could have such a zany influence?
The implications of our study extend beyond the whimsical world of television ratings, delving into the quirky dynamics of nomenclature and cultural phenomena. It seems that the choice of a name, much like a compelling plot twist, can shape the destiny of even the most seemingly unrelated entities.
In light of these revelatory findings, it is our fervent recommendation that no further research be conducted on this unusual correlation. To paraphrase the Bard himself, "The folly, dear researchers, lies not in our stars, but in our names."
In the grand theater of statistical oddities, we bid adieu to our curious exploration of "Franklin" and "Two and a Half Men," leaving behind a data trail as comedic and confounding as any sitcom script. As the curtains fall on this merry tale of names and Nielsen ratings, let us remember that in the world of academic inquiry, truth is often, indeed, stranger than fiction.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Franklin, My Dear Watson: Exploring the Fickle Nature of Names and TV Fame in 'Two and a Half Men' Season Ratings. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Pop Culture and Statistical Analysis
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Franklin, My Dear Watson: Exploring the Fickle Nature of Names and TV Fame in 'Two and a Half Men' Season Ratings. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Center for Quirky Cultural Analysis and Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Franklin, My Dear Watson: Exploring the Fickle Nature of Names and TV Fame in 'Two and a Half Men' Season Ratings with an abstract of This paper delves into the peculiar and surprisingly intertwined world of first names and television ratings, focusing specifically on the perplexing correlation between the popularity of the name "Franklin" and the seasonal fortunes of the sitcom "Two and a Half Men." Taking a lighthearted and pun-filled approach, we utilized data from the US Social Security Administration and Wikipedia to explore this unusual relationship.
Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8153372, accompanied by a p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2004 to 2015. These statistical results not only shed light on the whims of naming trends but also provide food for thought on the unpredictable nature of TV show popularity. So, grab your data goggles and buckle up for an entertaining journey through the somewhat zany world of names and ratings!
ChatGPT:
"Two and a Half Men" ratings, first names popularity, television show ratings, Franklin name popularity, TV show popularity correlation, naming trends, TV show season ratings, social security administration data, TV show popularity and first names, Franklin popularity correlation, first names and television ratings, US television season ratings
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Popularity of the first name FranklinDetailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Franklin
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Franklin
Season rating of "Two and a Half Men"
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Season rating of "Two and a Half Men"
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.6647748 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 66.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Season rating of "Two and a Half Men") is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Franklin) over the 12 years from 2004 through 2015.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0012. 0.0012290925334917753000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.12% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 814 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.45, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |
Popularity of the first name Franklin (Babies born) | 512 | 567 | 622 | 580 | 589 | 510 | 510 | 525 | 494 | 550 | 666 | 690 |
Season rating of "Two and a Half Men" (Rating) | 15 | 11 | 17 | 21 | 17 | 10 | 11 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 27 | 23 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([512,567,622,580,589,510,510,525,494,550,666,690,])
array_2 = np.array([15,11,17,21,17,10,11,17,11,11,27,23,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Franklin"
array_2_name = "Season rating of "Two and a Half Men""
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Popularity of the first name Franklin
- Line chart for only Season rating of "Two and a Half Men"
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Franklin, My Dear Watson: Exploring the Fickle Nature of Names and TV Fame in 'Two and a Half Men' Season Ratings
Your correlation rating is out of this world!
Correlation ID: 1403 · Black Variable ID: 2701 · Red Variable ID: 147