Report an error
Popularity of the first name Franklin correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Solar power generated in Aruba | r=0.96 | 12yrs | No |
The Walt Disney Company's stock price (DIS) | r=0.92 | 21yrs | No |
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals' stock price (REGN) | r=0.92 | 21yrs | No |
Popularity of the 'this is fine' meme | r=0.87 | 17yrs | No |
The number of motorcycle mechanics in Maine | r=0.86 | 20yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'dollar store near me' | r=0.86 | 19yrs | No |
Season rating of "Two and a Half Men" | r=0.82 | 12yrs | Yes! |
Popularity of the first name Franklin also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)