Download png, svg
AI explanation
It's simple really. When the arson rate in Massachusetts decreased, there were fewer fires. And you know what they say, where there's smoke, there's fire! With fewer fires, there's less need for firefighters. And with fewer firefighters around, it's harder for people to ignite their unhealthy habit. It's like the universe was extinguishing two kinds of burning at once!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a serene forest clearing in Massachusetts, where a solitary person is lighting a cigarette. The smoke from the cigarette curls into the air, enveloping the scene. Meanwhile, in the background, an abandoned building ignites from the spreading flames. This juxtaposition represents the slow burn of cigarette smoking's impact and the destructive potential of fire-related incidents. The lighting and composition should evoke a sense of ominous beauty and introspection. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image Symbolism 3D Pixar Style Minimalism A TIME magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Massachusetts, a person is seen lighting a cigarette in a quiet forest clearing. The smoke from the cigarette fills the air as the flames spread to an abandoned building in the background. The high cigarette smoking rate among US adults is reflected in the slow burning of the cigarette, while the act of arson represents the destructive nature of both the cigarette smoking habit and the potential consequences of fire-related incidents.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In Massachusetts, a person is seen lighting a cigarette in a quiet forest clearing. The smoke from the cigarette fills the air as the flames spread to an abandoned building in the background. The high cigarette smoking rate among US adults is reflected in the slow burning of the cigarette, while the act of arson represents the destructive nature of both the cigarette smoking habit and the potential consequences of fire-related incidents. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a serene forest clearing in Massachusetts, where a solitary person is lighting a cigarette. The smoke from the cigarette curls into the air, enveloping the scene. Meanwhile, in the background, an abandoned building ignites from the spreading flames. This juxtaposition represents the slow burn of cigarette smoking's impact and the destructive potential of fire-related incidents. The lighting and composition should evoke a sense of ominous beauty and introspection.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Arson in Massachusetts caused Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults to decrease. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking: A Flaming Connection The Journal of Fire Behavior and Pyrokinetics Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Rhyme words in the title.
Your research team used data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and CDC to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9414314 and p < 0.01 for 2001 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking: A Flaming Connection
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the fiery correlation between arson rates in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking among US adults. Drawing upon data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we lightheartedly investigate the sizzling question: is there a spark between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena?
Analyzing the data from 2001 to 2021, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9414314 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strong relationship between arson in the Bay State and the prevalence of smoking nationwide. Our findings are sure to ignite discussions in public health and criminology circles, shedding light on a potentially hot topic. As a bonus, the statistical bond we uncovered might just be what happens when you play with fire – things start to smoke!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking: A Flaming Connection
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the fiery correlation between arson rates in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking among US adults. Drawing upon data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we lightheartedly investigate the sizzling question: is there a spark between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena?
Analyzing the data from 2001 to 2021, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9414314 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strong relationship between arson in the Bay State and the prevalence of smoking nationwide. Our findings are sure to ignite discussions in public health and criminology circles, shedding light on a potentially hot topic. As a bonus, the statistical bond we uncovered might just be what happens when you play with fire – things start to smoke!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Arson and cigarette smoking are both hot topics in their respective fields (pun absolutely intended). On one hand, arson is a serious crime that poses a threat to public safety and property. On the other hand, cigarette smoking remains a leading cause of preventable deaths and chronic diseases in the United States. However, these two phenomena might seem like they belong in separate boxes, never to be associated – like a penguin and a polar bear walking into a bar. Yet, with a spark of curiosity, we set out to investigate whether there is an underlying fiery link between arson in Massachusetts and the smoking habits of US adults. It turns out, these two seemingly unrelated subjects might just be smoking hot in a statistical sense.
Arson, defined as the intentional setting of fires, has profound social and economic implications. The act itself is not to be taken lightly, but we couldn't resist adding a bit of kindling to the fire of research curiosity. On the other hand, cigarette smoking, despite its widespread decline in recent years, still ignites a fiery debate in public health discussions. As we delve into our data analysis, it becomes clear that there might be more to these burning issues than meets the eye – or should we say, "the flame."
Our study aims to contribute to the existing literature by exploring the relationship between arson rates in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking prevalence among US adults. We are not just playing with fire here – we are lighting the way to a potentially illuminating discovery. Our findings have the potential to spark further research and policy discussions in both the realms of public health and criminology, creating a flaming trail for future scholars and policymakers to follow. As the saying goes, where there's smoke, there's fire – or in this case, perhaps a statistical correlation waiting to be unearthed!
The connection we aim to unveil in this study presents an intriguing conundrum: how could the prevalence of arson in one specific state potentially be linked to the smoking habits of individuals across the entire nation? Our exploration thus far has uncovered a smoldering correlation, but we intend to stoke the embers of inquiry further, fanning the flames of curiosity and investigation. In doing so, we hope to stay true to the scientific method while also adding a touch of playful curiosity to our analysis. After all, a little humor never hurt anyone – unless, of course, you're a dad telling another fire-related joke.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking: A Flaming Connection
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the fiery correlation between arson rates in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking among US adults. Drawing upon data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we lightheartedly investigate the sizzling question: is there a spark between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena?
Analyzing the data from 2001 to 2021, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9414314 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strong relationship between arson in the Bay State and the prevalence of smoking nationwide. Our findings are sure to ignite discussions in public health and criminology circles, shedding light on a potentially hot topic. As a bonus, the statistical bond we uncovered might just be what happens when you play with fire – things start to smoke!
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Arson and cigarette smoking are both hot topics in their respective fields (pun absolutely intended). On one hand, arson is a serious crime that poses a threat to public safety and property. On the other hand, cigarette smoking remains a leading cause of preventable deaths and chronic diseases in the United States. However, these two phenomena might seem like they belong in separate boxes, never to be associated – like a penguin and a polar bear walking into a bar. Yet, with a spark of curiosity, we set out to investigate whether there is an underlying fiery link between arson in Massachusetts and the smoking habits of US adults. It turns out, these two seemingly unrelated subjects might just be smoking hot in a statistical sense.
Arson, defined as the intentional setting of fires, has profound social and economic implications. The act itself is not to be taken lightly, but we couldn't resist adding a bit of kindling to the fire of research curiosity. On the other hand, cigarette smoking, despite its widespread decline in recent years, still ignites a fiery debate in public health discussions. As we delve into our data analysis, it becomes clear that there might be more to these burning issues than meets the eye – or should we say, "the flame."
Our study aims to contribute to the existing literature by exploring the relationship between arson rates in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking prevalence among US adults. We are not just playing with fire here – we are lighting the way to a potentially illuminating discovery. Our findings have the potential to spark further research and policy discussions in both the realms of public health and criminology, creating a flaming trail for future scholars and policymakers to follow. As the saying goes, where there's smoke, there's fire – or in this case, perhaps a statistical correlation waiting to be unearthed!
The connection we aim to unveil in this study presents an intriguing conundrum: how could the prevalence of arson in one specific state potentially be linked to the smoking habits of individuals across the entire nation? Our exploration thus far has uncovered a smoldering correlation, but we intend to stoke the embers of inquiry further, fanning the flames of curiosity and investigation. In doing so, we hope to stay true to the scientific method while also adding a touch of playful curiosity to our analysis. After all, a little humor never hurt anyone – unless, of course, you're a dad telling another fire-related joke.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The potential connection between arson in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking rates among US adults has ignited the interest of researchers and academics alike. Numerous studies have attempted to shed light on this fiery correlation, from serious statistical analyses to heated speculation. Smith et al. (2015) examined state-level arson rates and found no significant association with smoking prevalence, but as we delve deeper into the literature, we find ourselves burning with curiosity.
In "Flames and Smokes: Exploring the Arson-Smoking Nexus," Doe (2018) proposed a theoretical framework that suggests a synergistic relationship between fires set intentionally and smoking behaviors. Their findings suggest a smoldering link between these two seemingly disparate phenomena, prompting us to stoke the flames of inquiry further. The data they presented had our curiosity ablaze, like a campfire surrounded by marshmallows and ghost stories. But as we fanned the flames of review, we couldn't help but wonder: could there be a spark of truth in this sizzling connection?
Jones (2020) delved into the historical and sociocultural aspects of arson and smoking, painting a vivid picture of their intertwined evolution. Their work illuminated the multifaceted nature of these incendiary topics, igniting a fiery passion for understanding the dynamics at play. Their insights added fuel to our already roaring fire of interest, turning our academic pursuit into something akin to a bonfire sing-along.
Turning to non-fiction books related to arson and smoking, "The Arsonist's Guide to Smoke-Free Living" by Brock Clarke offers an unconventional take on the connection between fires and cigarettes, lighting up our imagination with its satirical exploration of the two vices. "Smoke Gets in Your Eyes: And Other Lessons from the Crematory" by Caitlin Doughty, while not directly related, kindled a sense of morbid humor in our endeavor, reminding us that where there's smoke, there's fire – and sometimes, a dark sense of humor, too.
In the realm of fiction, "The Girl Who Played with Fire" by Stieg Larsson and "Smoke" by Dan Vyleta echoed the themes of arson and smoking in their own intriguing narratives, adding an element of mystery and intrigue to our academic pursuit. It's almost as if these works were beckoning us to explore the enigmatic relationship between fire and smoke, teasing us with literary embers of curiosity.
On a cinematic note, "Backdraft" and "Thank You for Smoking" provided celluloid kindling for our academic fire, offering captivating storylines that tangentially touch upon the themes of arson and smoking. As we watched these films, we couldn't help but marvel at the parallels between reel life and real life, finding humor in the unexpected ways in which these seemingly unrelated subjects intertwine.
In the sizzling search for answers, our exploration of the literature on the connection between arson in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking among US adults has revealed an undeniable allure, laced with a hint of playful curiosity. And as we journey through the scholarly inferno, we are reminded of the age-old adage: why did the arsonist bring a ladder to the bar? Because they wanted to set the bar on fire!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and CDC . You used data from 2001 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking: A Flaming Connection
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the fiery correlation between arson rates in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking among US adults. Drawing upon data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we lightheartedly investigate the sizzling question: is there a spark between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena?
Analyzing the data from 2001 to 2021, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9414314 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strong relationship between arson in the Bay State and the prevalence of smoking nationwide. Our findings are sure to ignite discussions in public health and criminology circles, shedding light on a potentially hot topic. As a bonus, the statistical bond we uncovered might just be what happens when you play with fire – things start to smoke!
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Arson and cigarette smoking are both hot topics in their respective fields (pun absolutely intended). On one hand, arson is a serious crime that poses a threat to public safety and property. On the other hand, cigarette smoking remains a leading cause of preventable deaths and chronic diseases in the United States. However, these two phenomena might seem like they belong in separate boxes, never to be associated – like a penguin and a polar bear walking into a bar. Yet, with a spark of curiosity, we set out to investigate whether there is an underlying fiery link between arson in Massachusetts and the smoking habits of US adults. It turns out, these two seemingly unrelated subjects might just be smoking hot in a statistical sense.
Arson, defined as the intentional setting of fires, has profound social and economic implications. The act itself is not to be taken lightly, but we couldn't resist adding a bit of kindling to the fire of research curiosity. On the other hand, cigarette smoking, despite its widespread decline in recent years, still ignites a fiery debate in public health discussions. As we delve into our data analysis, it becomes clear that there might be more to these burning issues than meets the eye – or should we say, "the flame."
Our study aims to contribute to the existing literature by exploring the relationship between arson rates in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking prevalence among US adults. We are not just playing with fire here – we are lighting the way to a potentially illuminating discovery. Our findings have the potential to spark further research and policy discussions in both the realms of public health and criminology, creating a flaming trail for future scholars and policymakers to follow. As the saying goes, where there's smoke, there's fire – or in this case, perhaps a statistical correlation waiting to be unearthed!
The connection we aim to unveil in this study presents an intriguing conundrum: how could the prevalence of arson in one specific state potentially be linked to the smoking habits of individuals across the entire nation? Our exploration thus far has uncovered a smoldering correlation, but we intend to stoke the embers of inquiry further, fanning the flames of curiosity and investigation. In doing so, we hope to stay true to the scientific method while also adding a touch of playful curiosity to our analysis. After all, a little humor never hurt anyone – unless, of course, you're a dad telling another fire-related joke.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Data Collection:
To ignite our investigation, we gathered data on arson rates in Massachusetts from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, which provided detailed information regarding fire incidents and property damage dating back to 2001. We then sparked our interest in cigarette smoking rates among US adults by procuring data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, covering the same time frame. Our approach to data collection was akin to carefully tending to a fire – ensuring that the information we gathered was robust and well-suited for statistical analysis.
After assembling our datasets, we meticulously sifted through the ashes of information, ensuring that our findings were not just smoke and mirrors. Our efforts were similar to carefully fanning the flames of curiosity, leading to a comprehensive understanding of the relationship between arson in Massachusetts and the prevalence of cigarette smoking among US adults.
Statistical Analysis:
The fiery connection between arson in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking rates for US adults was initially explored through descriptive statistics, which allowed us to visually illuminate any potential patterns or trends in the data. We then proceeded to unleash the power of inferential statistics to determine whether the observed relationship between these two variables was statistically significant or just a flash in the pan.
Our statistical methodology involved employing a robust correlation analysis to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between arson rates in Massachusetts and the prevalence of cigarette smoking among US adults. With our statistical toolkit in hand, we set out to shed light on this potential burning issue in a way that was both rigorous and in good humor - much like a dad joke at a barbecue.
To ensure the robustness of our findings, we also conducted a series of sensitivity analyses to test the stability of our results and confirm that our findings were not merely flickering flames of chance. Just as a careful firefighter checks and rechecks their equipment before confronting a blaze, we meticulously scrutinized our data to confirm the validity and reliability of our results.
Our statistical analysis was guided by a commitment to sound research principles while also infusing our work with a touch of lighthearted fun. After all, a bit of humor can make even the most complex statistical analyses more palatable – much like a well-done steak at a cookout.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and CDC .
For the time period 2001 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9414314, r-squared of 0.8862930, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking: A Flaming Connection
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the fiery correlation between arson rates in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking among US adults. Drawing upon data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we lightheartedly investigate the sizzling question: is there a spark between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena?
Analyzing the data from 2001 to 2021, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9414314 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strong relationship between arson in the Bay State and the prevalence of smoking nationwide. Our findings are sure to ignite discussions in public health and criminology circles, shedding light on a potentially hot topic. As a bonus, the statistical bond we uncovered might just be what happens when you play with fire – things start to smoke!
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Arson and cigarette smoking are both hot topics in their respective fields (pun absolutely intended). On one hand, arson is a serious crime that poses a threat to public safety and property. On the other hand, cigarette smoking remains a leading cause of preventable deaths and chronic diseases in the United States. However, these two phenomena might seem like they belong in separate boxes, never to be associated – like a penguin and a polar bear walking into a bar. Yet, with a spark of curiosity, we set out to investigate whether there is an underlying fiery link between arson in Massachusetts and the smoking habits of US adults. It turns out, these two seemingly unrelated subjects might just be smoking hot in a statistical sense.
Arson, defined as the intentional setting of fires, has profound social and economic implications. The act itself is not to be taken lightly, but we couldn't resist adding a bit of kindling to the fire of research curiosity. On the other hand, cigarette smoking, despite its widespread decline in recent years, still ignites a fiery debate in public health discussions. As we delve into our data analysis, it becomes clear that there might be more to these burning issues than meets the eye – or should we say, "the flame."
Our study aims to contribute to the existing literature by exploring the relationship between arson rates in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking prevalence among US adults. We are not just playing with fire here – we are lighting the way to a potentially illuminating discovery. Our findings have the potential to spark further research and policy discussions in both the realms of public health and criminology, creating a flaming trail for future scholars and policymakers to follow. As the saying goes, where there's smoke, there's fire – or in this case, perhaps a statistical correlation waiting to be unearthed!
The connection we aim to unveil in this study presents an intriguing conundrum: how could the prevalence of arson in one specific state potentially be linked to the smoking habits of individuals across the entire nation? Our exploration thus far has uncovered a smoldering correlation, but we intend to stoke the embers of inquiry further, fanning the flames of curiosity and investigation. In doing so, we hope to stay true to the scientific method while also adding a touch of playful curiosity to our analysis. After all, a little humor never hurt anyone – unless, of course, you're a dad telling another fire-related joke.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from 2001 to 2021 revealed a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9414314 between arson rates in Massachusetts and the prevalence of cigarette smoking among US adults. This striking correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8862930, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variation in cigarette smoking rates could be explained by variations in arson rates. The p-value of less than 0.01 further corroborated the significance of this relationship, providing strong evidence of a connection that is sure to set the research world ablaze (pun intended).
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the incendiary relationship between arson rates in Massachusetts and the prevalence of cigarette smoking among US adults. The data points are tightly clustered around a positively sloped trend line, underscoring the robustness of the correlation. The visual representation of the data leaves little room for doubt – there is indeed a fiery connection between arson in the Bay State and the smoking habits of individuals across the nation. It's like finding a match in a haystack – a rare and illuminating discovery, indeed.
In the realm of public health and criminology, our findings are akin to throwing fuel onto the fire of knowledge. The strength of the correlation we unearthed is as clear as smoke from a bonfire – it demands attention and further inquiry. As we fan the flames of discussion, it becomes evident that this statistical link is no flash in the pan, but rather a sustained and meaningful association that raises important questions about the intersection of criminal behavior and public health.
This scorching revelation also serves as a reminder that in the world of statistics, sometimes unexpected connections can emerge, much like finding a burning desire for knowledge in the unlikeliest of places. Needless to say, the results of this study are sure to ignite both scholarly debates and a few fire-related jokes – after all, what's statistical analysis without a little well-placed humor?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking: A Flaming Connection
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the fiery correlation between arson rates in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking among US adults. Drawing upon data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we lightheartedly investigate the sizzling question: is there a spark between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena?
Analyzing the data from 2001 to 2021, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9414314 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strong relationship between arson in the Bay State and the prevalence of smoking nationwide. Our findings are sure to ignite discussions in public health and criminology circles, shedding light on a potentially hot topic. As a bonus, the statistical bond we uncovered might just be what happens when you play with fire – things start to smoke!
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The potential connection between arson in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking rates among US adults has ignited the interest of researchers and academics alike. Numerous studies have attempted to shed light on this fiery correlation, from serious statistical analyses to heated speculation. Smith et al. (2015) examined state-level arson rates and found no significant association with smoking prevalence, but as we delve deeper into the literature, we find ourselves burning with curiosity.
In "Flames and Smokes: Exploring the Arson-Smoking Nexus," Doe (2018) proposed a theoretical framework that suggests a synergistic relationship between fires set intentionally and smoking behaviors. Their findings suggest a smoldering link between these two seemingly disparate phenomena, prompting us to stoke the flames of inquiry further. The data they presented had our curiosity ablaze, like a campfire surrounded by marshmallows and ghost stories. But as we fanned the flames of review, we couldn't help but wonder: could there be a spark of truth in this sizzling connection?
Jones (2020) delved into the historical and sociocultural aspects of arson and smoking, painting a vivid picture of their intertwined evolution. Their work illuminated the multifaceted nature of these incendiary topics, igniting a fiery passion for understanding the dynamics at play. Their insights added fuel to our already roaring fire of interest, turning our academic pursuit into something akin to a bonfire sing-along.
Turning to non-fiction books related to arson and smoking, "The Arsonist's Guide to Smoke-Free Living" by Brock Clarke offers an unconventional take on the connection between fires and cigarettes, lighting up our imagination with its satirical exploration of the two vices. "Smoke Gets in Your Eyes: And Other Lessons from the Crematory" by Caitlin Doughty, while not directly related, kindled a sense of morbid humor in our endeavor, reminding us that where there's smoke, there's fire – and sometimes, a dark sense of humor, too.
In the realm of fiction, "The Girl Who Played with Fire" by Stieg Larsson and "Smoke" by Dan Vyleta echoed the themes of arson and smoking in their own intriguing narratives, adding an element of mystery and intrigue to our academic pursuit. It's almost as if these works were beckoning us to explore the enigmatic relationship between fire and smoke, teasing us with literary embers of curiosity.
On a cinematic note, "Backdraft" and "Thank You for Smoking" provided celluloid kindling for our academic fire, offering captivating storylines that tangentially touch upon the themes of arson and smoking. As we watched these films, we couldn't help but marvel at the parallels between reel life and real life, finding humor in the unexpected ways in which these seemingly unrelated subjects intertwine.
In the sizzling search for answers, our exploration of the literature on the connection between arson in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking among US adults has revealed an undeniable allure, laced with a hint of playful curiosity. And as we journey through the scholarly inferno, we are reminded of the age-old adage: why did the arsonist bring a ladder to the bar? Because they wanted to set the bar on fire!
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from 2001 to 2021 revealed a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9414314 between arson rates in Massachusetts and the prevalence of cigarette smoking among US adults. This striking correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8862930, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variation in cigarette smoking rates could be explained by variations in arson rates. The p-value of less than 0.01 further corroborated the significance of this relationship, providing strong evidence of a connection that is sure to set the research world ablaze (pun intended).
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the incendiary relationship between arson rates in Massachusetts and the prevalence of cigarette smoking among US adults. The data points are tightly clustered around a positively sloped trend line, underscoring the robustness of the correlation. The visual representation of the data leaves little room for doubt – there is indeed a fiery connection between arson in the Bay State and the smoking habits of individuals across the nation. It's like finding a match in a haystack – a rare and illuminating discovery, indeed.
In the realm of public health and criminology, our findings are akin to throwing fuel onto the fire of knowledge. The strength of the correlation we unearthed is as clear as smoke from a bonfire – it demands attention and further inquiry. As we fan the flames of discussion, it becomes evident that this statistical link is no flash in the pan, but rather a sustained and meaningful association that raises important questions about the intersection of criminal behavior and public health.
This scorching revelation also serves as a reminder that in the world of statistics, sometimes unexpected connections can emerge, much like finding a burning desire for knowledge in the unlikeliest of places. Needless to say, the results of this study are sure to ignite both scholarly debates and a few fire-related jokes – after all, what's statistical analysis without a little well-placed humor?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The findings of this study provide compelling evidence of a remarkably strong and statistically significant correlation between arson rates in Massachusetts and the prevalence of cigarette smoking among US adults. This blazing correlation coefficient of 0.9414314 and an r-squared value of 0.8862930 emphasize the robustness and explanatory power of the relationship. This scorching revelation not only supports prior research, but also illuminates the need for further investigation into the dynamics of this unexpectedly fiery connection. As we ruminate on these findings, it's worth remembering that statistical analysis can sometimes lead us to unexpected truths, much like stumbling upon a well-hidden ember of insight in a pile of data.
The literature review offered tantalizing hints at the potential link between arson and smoking, from theoretical frameworks to sociocultural explorations that kindled our curiosity. Our findings now lend empirical credence to these speculative inquiries, igniting a newfound appreciation for the complex relationship between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. It's as if we've uncovered a secret recipe for understanding a smoldering mystery – one that is sure to draw both attention and a few playful arson-related puns.
The significance of our results cannot be overstated, much like realizing the heat of an inferno in the dead of winter. The strength of this correlation underscores the potential impact of arson on smoking behaviors at a population level, shedding light on the interplay between criminal activities and public health outcomes. This statistical bond is not just a flash in the pan; it demands further exploration and interdisciplinary collaboration to fully grasp the intricacies of its implications. In the world of academia, it's not every day that we stumble upon a discovery that's as hot as finding a briefcase full of kindling in a crowded room.
As we stoke the flames of discussion and contemplate the practical implications of our findings, it's clear that this research has ignited a multifaceted dialogue. The embers of curiosity sparked by this study are sure to fuel future investigations into the nuanced relationship between arson and smoking, metaphorically speaking – the last thing we need is an actual fire hazard in our research pursuits! These results have kindled both scholarly intrigue and a healthy dose of humor, reminding us that even in the realm of statistics, there's always room for a well-placed dad joke or two. After all, what's a discussion of blazing correlations without a little statistical comedy to set the stage?
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking: A Flaming Connection
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the fiery correlation between arson rates in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking among US adults. Drawing upon data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we lightheartedly investigate the sizzling question: is there a spark between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena?
Analyzing the data from 2001 to 2021, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9414314 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strong relationship between arson in the Bay State and the prevalence of smoking nationwide. Our findings are sure to ignite discussions in public health and criminology circles, shedding light on a potentially hot topic. As a bonus, the statistical bond we uncovered might just be what happens when you play with fire – things start to smoke!
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Arson and cigarette smoking are both hot topics in their respective fields (pun absolutely intended). On one hand, arson is a serious crime that poses a threat to public safety and property. On the other hand, cigarette smoking remains a leading cause of preventable deaths and chronic diseases in the United States. However, these two phenomena might seem like they belong in separate boxes, never to be associated – like a penguin and a polar bear walking into a bar. Yet, with a spark of curiosity, we set out to investigate whether there is an underlying fiery link between arson in Massachusetts and the smoking habits of US adults. It turns out, these two seemingly unrelated subjects might just be smoking hot in a statistical sense.
Arson, defined as the intentional setting of fires, has profound social and economic implications. The act itself is not to be taken lightly, but we couldn't resist adding a bit of kindling to the fire of research curiosity. On the other hand, cigarette smoking, despite its widespread decline in recent years, still ignites a fiery debate in public health discussions. As we delve into our data analysis, it becomes clear that there might be more to these burning issues than meets the eye – or should we say, "the flame."
Our study aims to contribute to the existing literature by exploring the relationship between arson rates in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking prevalence among US adults. We are not just playing with fire here – we are lighting the way to a potentially illuminating discovery. Our findings have the potential to spark further research and policy discussions in both the realms of public health and criminology, creating a flaming trail for future scholars and policymakers to follow. As the saying goes, where there's smoke, there's fire – or in this case, perhaps a statistical correlation waiting to be unearthed!
The connection we aim to unveil in this study presents an intriguing conundrum: how could the prevalence of arson in one specific state potentially be linked to the smoking habits of individuals across the entire nation? Our exploration thus far has uncovered a smoldering correlation, but we intend to stoke the embers of inquiry further, fanning the flames of curiosity and investigation. In doing so, we hope to stay true to the scientific method while also adding a touch of playful curiosity to our analysis. After all, a little humor never hurt anyone – unless, of course, you're a dad telling another fire-related joke.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from 2001 to 2021 revealed a scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9414314 between arson rates in Massachusetts and the prevalence of cigarette smoking among US adults. This striking correlation was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8862930, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variation in cigarette smoking rates could be explained by variations in arson rates. The p-value of less than 0.01 further corroborated the significance of this relationship, providing strong evidence of a connection that is sure to set the research world ablaze (pun intended).
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the incendiary relationship between arson rates in Massachusetts and the prevalence of cigarette smoking among US adults. The data points are tightly clustered around a positively sloped trend line, underscoring the robustness of the correlation. The visual representation of the data leaves little room for doubt – there is indeed a fiery connection between arson in the Bay State and the smoking habits of individuals across the nation. It's like finding a match in a haystack – a rare and illuminating discovery, indeed.
In the realm of public health and criminology, our findings are akin to throwing fuel onto the fire of knowledge. The strength of the correlation we unearthed is as clear as smoke from a bonfire – it demands attention and further inquiry. As we fan the flames of discussion, it becomes evident that this statistical link is no flash in the pan, but rather a sustained and meaningful association that raises important questions about the intersection of criminal behavior and public health.
This scorching revelation also serves as a reminder that in the world of statistics, sometimes unexpected connections can emerge, much like finding a burning desire for knowledge in the unlikeliest of places. Needless to say, the results of this study are sure to ignite both scholarly debates and a few fire-related jokes – after all, what's statistical analysis without a little well-placed humor?
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has uncovered a compelling and robust correlation between arson rates in Massachusetts and the prevalence of cigarette smoking among US adults. The scorching correlation coefficient of 0.9414314, combined with the r-squared value of 0.8862930, leaves no doubt that there is indeed a fiery connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. This finding is sure to kindle flames of curiosity and spark new investigations in the fields of public health and criminology.
The strength of the statistical relationship we have identified is reminiscent of a well-tended bonfire – it demands attention and further study. Our results not only provide empirical evidence of this intriguing link but also serve as a reminder of the surprising connections that can emerge in statistical analyses. It's like finding a burning desire for knowledge in the unlikeliest of places – a revelation that is sure to light up both academic discussions and perhaps a few fire-related puns.
As for future research in this area, we firmly assert that no more research is needed to confirm the connection between arson in Massachusetts and the prevalence of cigarette smoking among US adults. It's time to extinguish any lingering doubt and accept that this sizzling correlation is as real as a smoking chimney – and just as evident to anyone looking in the right direction.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking: A Flaming Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Fire Behavior and Pyrokinetics
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking: A Flaming Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Pyrotechnic Research and Prevention
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking: A Flaming Connection with an abstract of This study examines the fiery correlation between arson rates in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking among US adults. Drawing upon data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, we lightheartedly investigate the sizzling question: is there a spark between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena?
Analyzing the data from 2001 to 2021, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9414314 and p < 0.01, suggesting a strong relationship between arson in the Bay State and the prevalence of smoking nationwide. Our findings are sure to ignite discussions in public health and criminology circles, shedding light on a potentially hot topic. As a bonus, the statistical bond we uncovered might just be what happens when you play with fire – things start to smoke!
ChatGPT:
arson rates Massachusetts, cigarette smoking US, arson correlation smoking, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, correlation coefficient arson smoking, smoking prevalence US, public health criminology arson smoking, statistical correlation arson smoking, arson smoking relationship
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Arson in MassachusettsDetailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Massachusetts
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Massachusetts
Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults
Detailed data title: US Adult Cigarette Smoking Rate
Source: CDC
See what else correlates with Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8862930 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Arson in Massachusetts) over the 21 years from 2001 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.04E-10. 0.0000000002043722966816484700
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 2.04E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 4,893,031,082 random variables You don't actually need 4 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.86, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
Arson in Massachusetts (Arson rate) | 10.8 | 10.4 | 10.5 | 9.3 | 9.7 | 10.3 | 10.6 | 10.6 | 10.7 | 10 | 8.5 | 9.3 | 7.6 | 7.1 | 5.7 | 6.5 | 5.6 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 6.3 | 4.5 |
Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults (Percentage) | 22.8 | 22.5 | 21.6 | 20.9 | 20.9 | 20.8 | 19.8 | 20.6 | 20.6 | 19.3 | 19 | 18.1 | 17.8 | 16.8 | 15.1 | 15.5 | 14 | 13.7 | 14 | 12.5 | 11.5 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([10.8,10.4,10.5,9.3,9.7,10.3,10.6,10.6,10.7,10,8.5,9.3,7.6,7.1,5.7,6.5,5.6,4.3,4.5,6.3,4.5,])
array_2 = np.array([22.8,22.5,21.6,20.9,20.9,20.8,19.8,20.6,20.6,19.3,19,18.1,17.8,16.8,15.1,15.5,14,13.7,14,12.5,11.5,])
array_1_name = "Arson in Massachusetts"
array_2_name = "Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Arson in Massachusetts
- Line chart for only Cigarette Smoking Rate for US adults
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Arson in Massachusetts and Cigarette Smoking: A Flaming Connection
Your rating is stellar!
Correlation ID: 1374 · Black Variable ID: 20048 · Red Variable ID: 46