about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,367 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and the second variable is Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo.  The chart goes from 2008 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

It turns out, GMO corn in Missouri has been secretly emitting LPG as a byproduct. So, as the GMO use decreased, there was a lot less corny LPG to go around, leaving Kosovo feeling a-maize-ingly cleaner.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a grayscale newspaper illustration of a vast cornfield in Missouri, with genetically modified corn towering high. In the foreground, farmers are seen meticulously tending to the crops. In the distance, a truck is being filled with liquefied petroleum gas in Kosovo, while workers prepare for the upcoming harvest season. The contrasting scenes of agricultural progress and industrial activity should be captured in a straightforward yet evocative manner, reminiscent of a classic newspaper illustration but with a modern twist. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image A black-and-white newspaper illustration A black-and-white newspaper illustration Voxel art A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
ChatGPT: A black-and-white newspaper illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo together. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sprawling cornfield in Missouri, farmers are using genetically modified seeds to grow abundant, healthy corn. In the distance, a truck is being filled with liquefied petroleum gas in Kosovo, while workers prepare for the upcoming harvest season.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A black-and-white newspaper illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a sprawling cornfield in Missouri, farmers are using genetically modified seeds to grow abundant, healthy corn. In the distance, a truck is being filled with liquefied petroleum gas in Kosovo, while workers prepare for the upcoming harvest season. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a grayscale newspaper illustration of a vast cornfield in Missouri, with genetically modified corn towering high. In the foreground, farmers are seen meticulously tending to the crops. In the distance, a truck is being filled with liquefied petroleum gas in Kosovo, while workers prepare for the upcoming harvest season. The contrasting scenes of agricultural progress and industrial activity should be captured in a straightforward yet evocative manner, reminiscent of a classic newspaper illustration but with a modern twist.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in Missouri caused Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Maizey Connections: Exploring the Correlation between GMO Corn in Missouri and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Kosovo

Journal of Transnational Crop Science

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from USDA and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9202476 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Maizey Connections: Exploring the Correlation between GMO Corn in Missouri and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Kosovo

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the often overlooked interplay between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo. Drawing on data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to elucidate this obscure connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9202476 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2008 to 2021 reveal a compelling relationship deserving of further inquiry. Our findings offer an intriguing insight into the unexpectedly far-reaching implications of agricultural practices, as well as energy usage patterns, on a global scale. This study underscores the importance of examining unconventional associations and not dismissing them as mere coincornidences.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Maizey Connections: Exploring the Correlation between GMO Corn in Missouri and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Kosovo

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the often overlooked interplay between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo. Drawing on data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to elucidate this obscure connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9202476 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2008 to 2021 reveal a compelling relationship deserving of further inquiry. Our findings offer an intriguing insight into the unexpectedly far-reaching implications of agricultural practices, as well as energy usage patterns, on a global scale. This study underscores the importance of examining unconventional associations and not dismissing them as mere coincornidences.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the realm of agricultural and energy studies, correlations between seemingly disparate variables often elude detection. However, our research aims to shed light on one such overlooked nexus: the relationship between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo. While the thought of GMO corn and LPG coming together may initially seem as incongruous as popcorn and cauliflower, our investigation has revealed a surprising connection worthy of scholarly attention.

The proliferation of genetically modified corn, often referred to as "GMO maize," has sparked debates as heated as a cob of corn itself. Conversely, the utilization of liquefied petroleum gas in Kosovo raises questions as to its ecological impact and the "earthy" repercussions. In this cornucopia of agricultural and energy inquiries, our study endeavors to analyze the correlation between these seemingly independent phenomena to discern any substantive linkages.

With a statistical correlation coefficient of 0.9202476 between the cultivation of GMO corn in Missouri and LPG usage in Kosovo, the data speaks volumes. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 unequivocally suggests a relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. This study thus represents a kernel of insight into the potential interplay between regional agricultural practices and their unanticipated influence on energy consumption patterns half a world away.

As we delve deeper into the unsuspected bond between GMO corn in the Show Me State and the LPG consumption in the Land of the Eagles, we invite readers to join us in uncovering the cobweb of connections that interlace our global agricultural and energy tapestry. Let us cultivate a deeper understanding of these intriguing interrelationships, while withholding any impulse to dismiss them as mere "cornspiracy theories."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Maizey Connections: Exploring the Correlation between GMO Corn in Missouri and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Kosovo

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the often overlooked interplay between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo. Drawing on data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to elucidate this obscure connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9202476 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2008 to 2021 reveal a compelling relationship deserving of further inquiry. Our findings offer an intriguing insight into the unexpectedly far-reaching implications of agricultural practices, as well as energy usage patterns, on a global scale. This study underscores the importance of examining unconventional associations and not dismissing them as mere coincornidences.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of agricultural and energy studies, correlations between seemingly disparate variables often elude detection. However, our research aims to shed light on one such overlooked nexus: the relationship between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo. While the thought of GMO corn and LPG coming together may initially seem as incongruous as popcorn and cauliflower, our investigation has revealed a surprising connection worthy of scholarly attention.
The proliferation of genetically modified corn, often referred to as "GMO maize," has sparked debates as heated as a cob of corn itself. Conversely, the utilization of liquefied petroleum gas in Kosovo raises questions as to its ecological impact and the "earthy" repercussions. In this cornucopia of agricultural and energy inquiries, our study endeavors to analyze the correlation between these seemingly independent phenomena to discern any substantive linkages.
With a statistical correlation coefficient of 0.9202476 between the cultivation of GMO corn in Missouri and LPG usage in Kosovo, the data speaks volumes. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 unequivocally suggests a relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. This study thus represents a kernel of insight into the potential interplay between regional agricultural practices and their unanticipated influence on energy consumption patterns half a world away.
As we delve deeper into the unsuspected bond between GMO corn in the Show Me State and the LPG consumption in the Land of the Eagles, we invite readers to join us in uncovering the cobweb of connections that interlace our global agricultural and energy tapestry. Let us cultivate a deeper understanding of these intriguing interrelationships, while withholding any impulse to dismiss them as mere "cornspiracy theories."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Exploring the intersection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo has led researchers to consult a variety of sources on seemingly unrelated topics that, upon further examination, have surprising connective threads to this enigmatic phenomenon. In "The Dynamics of GMO Adoption: Implications for Developing Countries," Smith et al. offer insight into the implications of GMO adoption, albeit in a context removed from the surreal juxtaposition of corn and gas. Similarly, Doe's "Energy and Society: An Introduction" contains pertinent discussions on energy usage patterns, though it does not explicitly address the specific linkage at hand. These serious works lay a foundation, but they only scratch the surface of this unanticipated nexus.

Branching out from traditional academic sources, inquiries into the relationship between agricultural practices and energy consumption often lead down unexpected pathways. "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan explores modern agriculture and its consequences, providing a cornucopia of insights relevant to the GMO corn component of the study. Additionally, "The Corn Maiden and Other Nightmares" by Joyce Carol Oates offers a gripping fictional exploration of the symbolic significance of corn, serving as an eerie reminder of the omnipresence of this seemingly innocuous grain. While these sources may appear tangential to the investigation at hand, they have proven essential in understanding the broader cultural implications of maize and energy resource utilization.

In conducting this literature review, the research team has left no kernel unturned, delving into unconventional avenues in the pursuit of a comprehensive understanding. Beyond the realm of scholarly discourse, the authors have also drawn from fictional works, including "Children of the Corn" by Stephen King. While this chilling tale of cornfields possessed by supernatural forces may appear wholly unrelated to the subject matter, it has provided unexpected inspiration for contemplating the mystical forces that may underlie the baffling connection between GMO corn in Missouri and LPG consumption in Kosovo.

To ensure a thorough review of the literature, the authors have not hesitated to explore unconventional sources, including the labels of corn-based snack products and even the backs of shampoo bottles, where kernels of wisdom pertaining to agricultural and energy topics have been serendipitously discovered.

In synthesizing these divergent sources, the research team remains committed to shedding light on this inexplicable correlation while injecting a kernel of humor into the scholarly discourse. After all, exploring the surreal interplay between GMO corn and LPG consumption should not prevent a few lighthearted puns from popping up along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2008 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Maizey Connections: Exploring the Correlation between GMO Corn in Missouri and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Kosovo

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the often overlooked interplay between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo. Drawing on data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to elucidate this obscure connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9202476 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2008 to 2021 reveal a compelling relationship deserving of further inquiry. Our findings offer an intriguing insight into the unexpectedly far-reaching implications of agricultural practices, as well as energy usage patterns, on a global scale. This study underscores the importance of examining unconventional associations and not dismissing them as mere coincornidences.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of agricultural and energy studies, correlations between seemingly disparate variables often elude detection. However, our research aims to shed light on one such overlooked nexus: the relationship between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo. While the thought of GMO corn and LPG coming together may initially seem as incongruous as popcorn and cauliflower, our investigation has revealed a surprising connection worthy of scholarly attention.
The proliferation of genetically modified corn, often referred to as "GMO maize," has sparked debates as heated as a cob of corn itself. Conversely, the utilization of liquefied petroleum gas in Kosovo raises questions as to its ecological impact and the "earthy" repercussions. In this cornucopia of agricultural and energy inquiries, our study endeavors to analyze the correlation between these seemingly independent phenomena to discern any substantive linkages.
With a statistical correlation coefficient of 0.9202476 between the cultivation of GMO corn in Missouri and LPG usage in Kosovo, the data speaks volumes. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 unequivocally suggests a relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. This study thus represents a kernel of insight into the potential interplay between regional agricultural practices and their unanticipated influence on energy consumption patterns half a world away.
As we delve deeper into the unsuspected bond between GMO corn in the Show Me State and the LPG consumption in the Land of the Eagles, we invite readers to join us in uncovering the cobweb of connections that interlace our global agricultural and energy tapestry. Let us cultivate a deeper understanding of these intriguing interrelationships, while withholding any impulse to dismiss them as mere "cornspiracy theories."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Data Collection:
The data for this study was harvested from various sources, predominantly the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration. The use of these sources ensured that the data was as fresh as the produce in a farmer's market, spanning the years 2008 to 2021. Care was taken to select data sets free from any kernels of doubt or ambiguity, ensuring a bushel of reliable information for analysis.

Correlation Analysis:
To establish a link between the use of GMO corn in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo, a rigorous correlation analysis was conducted. The correlation coefficient was calculated with the precision of a meticulous maize farmer, resulting in a coefficient of 0.9202476. Not only did this reveal a strong association, but it also demonstrated a consistency as reliable as the yearly harvest.

Statistical Testing:
In addition to the correlation analysis, statistical testing was employed to substantiate the findings. The p-value, likened to the rare heirloom variety, turned out to be less than 0.01. Such an elusive p-value indicated that the relationship between GMO corn production in Missouri and LPG consumption in Kosovo was not simply a trick of the corn stalks, but a genuine connection deserving of scholarly agronomic attention.

Control Variables:
A number of control variables were introduced to ensure that the identified correlation was not a result of any extraneous factors, such as weather patterns resembling a storm in a teacup. Variables such as economic indicators, political events, and dietary trends were included in the analysis to weed out any spurious associations, leaving behind only the ripest of relationships to explore.

Sensitivity Analysis:
To ensure the robustness of the findings, sensitivity analyses were conducted, transplanting the statistical models into different contexts to see if the connection held steady. This scrutiny was as essential as checking for signs of ripeness in a field of maize, confirming that the observed association was not a mere fluke, but a steadfast connection worthy of further cultivation.

Overall, the methodology employed in this study not only provided a thorough examination of the connection between GMO corn in Missouri and LPG usage in Kosovo but also offered a refreshing approach to exploring the often unexpected and undervalued interdependencies in the agricultural and energy spheres.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2008 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9202476, r-squared of 0.8468556, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Maizey Connections: Exploring the Correlation between GMO Corn in Missouri and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Kosovo

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the often overlooked interplay between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo. Drawing on data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to elucidate this obscure connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9202476 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2008 to 2021 reveal a compelling relationship deserving of further inquiry. Our findings offer an intriguing insight into the unexpectedly far-reaching implications of agricultural practices, as well as energy usage patterns, on a global scale. This study underscores the importance of examining unconventional associations and not dismissing them as mere coincornidences.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of agricultural and energy studies, correlations between seemingly disparate variables often elude detection. However, our research aims to shed light on one such overlooked nexus: the relationship between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo. While the thought of GMO corn and LPG coming together may initially seem as incongruous as popcorn and cauliflower, our investigation has revealed a surprising connection worthy of scholarly attention.
The proliferation of genetically modified corn, often referred to as "GMO maize," has sparked debates as heated as a cob of corn itself. Conversely, the utilization of liquefied petroleum gas in Kosovo raises questions as to its ecological impact and the "earthy" repercussions. In this cornucopia of agricultural and energy inquiries, our study endeavors to analyze the correlation between these seemingly independent phenomena to discern any substantive linkages.
With a statistical correlation coefficient of 0.9202476 between the cultivation of GMO corn in Missouri and LPG usage in Kosovo, the data speaks volumes. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 unequivocally suggests a relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. This study thus represents a kernel of insight into the potential interplay between regional agricultural practices and their unanticipated influence on energy consumption patterns half a world away.
As we delve deeper into the unsuspected bond between GMO corn in the Show Me State and the LPG consumption in the Land of the Eagles, we invite readers to join us in uncovering the cobweb of connections that interlace our global agricultural and energy tapestry. Let us cultivate a deeper understanding of these intriguing interrelationships, while withholding any impulse to dismiss them as mere "cornspiracy theories."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The rigorous statistical analysis of the data collected from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration has led to the revelation of a remarkably strong correlation between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo. The calculated correlation coefficient of 0.9202476 suggests an exceptionally robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, leaving little room for skepticism.

Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8468556 indicates that approximately 84.69% of the variability in LPG usage in Kosovo can be explained by the variation in GMO corn production in Missouri. This substantial explanatory power emphasizes the substantial influence of GMO corn production on the patterns of LPG consumption across time and space.

The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the significance of the observed correlation, affirming that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by mere chance is exceedingly slim. This statistically significant result demands attention and raises intriguing questions regarding the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected connection.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the undeniable association between the use of GMO corn in Missouri and LPG consumption in Kosovo, serving as a compelling visual testament to the strength of this correlation. The unmistakable clustering of data points along the trendline vividly illustrates the coherence between these two variables, leaving little room for doubt or alternative explanations.

In essence, the investigation has unraveled a fascinating and substantial linkage between the agricultural practices in Missouri and the energy consumption patterns in Kosovo. This unexpected connection challenges conventional assumptions and underscores the intricate interdependencies weaving through our global agricultural and energy landscape. This study not only corroborates the influential role of GMO corn production in shaping energy usage afar but also encourages further exploration into the unanticipated ramifications of agricultural practices on energy dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Maizey Connections: Exploring the Correlation between GMO Corn in Missouri and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Kosovo

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the often overlooked interplay between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo. Drawing on data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to elucidate this obscure connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9202476 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2008 to 2021 reveal a compelling relationship deserving of further inquiry. Our findings offer an intriguing insight into the unexpectedly far-reaching implications of agricultural practices, as well as energy usage patterns, on a global scale. This study underscores the importance of examining unconventional associations and not dismissing them as mere coincornidences.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Exploring the intersection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo has led researchers to consult a variety of sources on seemingly unrelated topics that, upon further examination, have surprising connective threads to this enigmatic phenomenon. In "The Dynamics of GMO Adoption: Implications for Developing Countries," Smith et al. offer insight into the implications of GMO adoption, albeit in a context removed from the surreal juxtaposition of corn and gas. Similarly, Doe's "Energy and Society: An Introduction" contains pertinent discussions on energy usage patterns, though it does not explicitly address the specific linkage at hand. These serious works lay a foundation, but they only scratch the surface of this unanticipated nexus.
Branching out from traditional academic sources, inquiries into the relationship between agricultural practices and energy consumption often lead down unexpected pathways. "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan explores modern agriculture and its consequences, providing a cornucopia of insights relevant to the GMO corn component of the study. Additionally, "The Corn Maiden and Other Nightmares" by Joyce Carol Oates offers a gripping fictional exploration of the symbolic significance of corn, serving as an eerie reminder of the omnipresence of this seemingly innocuous grain. While these sources may appear tangential to the investigation at hand, they have proven essential in understanding the broader cultural implications of maize and energy resource utilization.
In conducting this literature review, the research team has left no kernel unturned, delving into unconventional avenues in the pursuit of a comprehensive understanding. Beyond the realm of scholarly discourse, the authors have also drawn from fictional works, including "Children of the Corn" by Stephen King. While this chilling tale of cornfields possessed by supernatural forces may appear wholly unrelated to the subject matter, it has provided unexpected inspiration for contemplating the mystical forces that may underlie the baffling connection between GMO corn in Missouri and LPG consumption in Kosovo.
To ensure a thorough review of the literature, the authors have not hesitated to explore unconventional sources, including the labels of corn-based snack products and even the backs of shampoo bottles, where kernels of wisdom pertaining to agricultural and energy topics have been serendipitously discovered.
In synthesizing these divergent sources, the research team remains committed to shedding light on this inexplicable correlation while injecting a kernel of humor into the scholarly discourse. After all, exploring the surreal interplay between GMO corn and LPG consumption should not prevent a few lighthearted puns from popping up along the way.

[[RESULTS]]
The rigorous statistical analysis of the data collected from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration has led to the revelation of a remarkably strong correlation between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo. The calculated correlation coefficient of 0.9202476 suggests an exceptionally robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, leaving little room for skepticism.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8468556 indicates that approximately 84.69% of the variability in LPG usage in Kosovo can be explained by the variation in GMO corn production in Missouri. This substantial explanatory power emphasizes the substantial influence of GMO corn production on the patterns of LPG consumption across time and space.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the significance of the observed correlation, affirming that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by mere chance is exceedingly slim. This statistically significant result demands attention and raises intriguing questions regarding the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected connection.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the undeniable association between the use of GMO corn in Missouri and LPG consumption in Kosovo, serving as a compelling visual testament to the strength of this correlation. The unmistakable clustering of data points along the trendline vividly illustrates the coherence between these two variables, leaving little room for doubt or alternative explanations.
In essence, the investigation has unraveled a fascinating and substantial linkage between the agricultural practices in Missouri and the energy consumption patterns in Kosovo. This unexpected connection challenges conventional assumptions and underscores the intricate interdependencies weaving through our global agricultural and energy landscape. This study not only corroborates the influential role of GMO corn production in shaping energy usage afar but also encourages further exploration into the unanticipated ramifications of agricultural practices on energy dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study provide empirical support for the speculative connections identified in the literature review. While one might have initially dismissed the surreal juxtaposition of GMO corn in Missouri and LPG consumption in Kosovo as mere coincornidences, the robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value unearthed in the present analysis lend credence to the legitimacy of this seemingly bizarre association.

The literature review, although unconventional with its inclusion of fictional works and non-academic sources, has proven to be surprisingly prescient in identifying the potential interplay between agricultural practices and energy consumption. In particular, Joyce Carol Oates' "The Corn Maiden and Other Nightmares" and Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" have provided an eerie yet insightful framework to tangentially approach the intricate nexus between GMO corn and LPG usage. Perhaps it was no mere corn-incidence that these works, while seemingly tangential, offered kernels of wisdom relevant to the investigation at hand.

Moreover, the scatterplot visually depicts the undeniable association between the use of GMO corn in Missouri and LPG consumption in Kosovo, leaving little room for skepticism or cornfusion. The clustering of data points along the trendline paints a compelling picture of the coherence between these two variables, proving that this intriguing correlation is not to be dismissed as a mere stalk of luck. The statistically significant result serves as a kernel of truth that demands acknowledgment and further inquiry.

In summary, the results of this study underscore the unexpectedly far-reaching implications of agricultural practices, namely GMO corn cultivation, on energy dynamics on a global scale. This research highlights the necessity of keeping an open mind and not shucking off unconventional associations as mere corn-undrums. The insight garnered from this investigation encourages a deeper understanding of the intricate interdependencies between seemingly disparate components of our global agricultural and energy landscape. Further research must endeavor to peel back the layers of this enigmatic connection, for it is clear that the maizey connections between GMO corn and LPG consumption transcend mere corn-ceptualizations and deserve further exploration.

The unexpected correlates and enigmatic relationships unearthed in this study serve as a reminder of the serendipitous discoveries that can emerge from scholarly inquiry. After all, as the saying goes, "Where there's a kernel, there's a way."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Missouri and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Maizey Connections: Exploring the Correlation between GMO Corn in Missouri and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Kosovo

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the often overlooked interplay between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo. Drawing on data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to elucidate this obscure connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9202476 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2008 to 2021 reveal a compelling relationship deserving of further inquiry. Our findings offer an intriguing insight into the unexpectedly far-reaching implications of agricultural practices, as well as energy usage patterns, on a global scale. This study underscores the importance of examining unconventional associations and not dismissing them as mere coincornidences.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of agricultural and energy studies, correlations between seemingly disparate variables often elude detection. However, our research aims to shed light on one such overlooked nexus: the relationship between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo. While the thought of GMO corn and LPG coming together may initially seem as incongruous as popcorn and cauliflower, our investigation has revealed a surprising connection worthy of scholarly attention.
The proliferation of genetically modified corn, often referred to as "GMO maize," has sparked debates as heated as a cob of corn itself. Conversely, the utilization of liquefied petroleum gas in Kosovo raises questions as to its ecological impact and the "earthy" repercussions. In this cornucopia of agricultural and energy inquiries, our study endeavors to analyze the correlation between these seemingly independent phenomena to discern any substantive linkages.
With a statistical correlation coefficient of 0.9202476 between the cultivation of GMO corn in Missouri and LPG usage in Kosovo, the data speaks volumes. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 unequivocally suggests a relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere coincidence. This study thus represents a kernel of insight into the potential interplay between regional agricultural practices and their unanticipated influence on energy consumption patterns half a world away.
As we delve deeper into the unsuspected bond between GMO corn in the Show Me State and the LPG consumption in the Land of the Eagles, we invite readers to join us in uncovering the cobweb of connections that interlace our global agricultural and energy tapestry. Let us cultivate a deeper understanding of these intriguing interrelationships, while withholding any impulse to dismiss them as mere "cornspiracy theories."

[[RESULTS]]
The rigorous statistical analysis of the data collected from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration has led to the revelation of a remarkably strong correlation between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo. The calculated correlation coefficient of 0.9202476 suggests an exceptionally robust relationship between these seemingly disparate variables, leaving little room for skepticism.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8468556 indicates that approximately 84.69% of the variability in LPG usage in Kosovo can be explained by the variation in GMO corn production in Missouri. This substantial explanatory power emphasizes the substantial influence of GMO corn production on the patterns of LPG consumption across time and space.
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the significance of the observed correlation, affirming that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by mere chance is exceedingly slim. This statistically significant result demands attention and raises intriguing questions regarding the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected connection.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the undeniable association between the use of GMO corn in Missouri and LPG consumption in Kosovo, serving as a compelling visual testament to the strength of this correlation. The unmistakable clustering of data points along the trendline vividly illustrates the coherence between these two variables, leaving little room for doubt or alternative explanations.
In essence, the investigation has unraveled a fascinating and substantial linkage between the agricultural practices in Missouri and the energy consumption patterns in Kosovo. This unexpected connection challenges conventional assumptions and underscores the intricate interdependencies weaving through our global agricultural and energy landscape. This study not only corroborates the influential role of GMO corn production in shaping energy usage afar but also encourages further exploration into the unanticipated ramifications of agricultural practices on energy dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has brought to light the compelling correlation between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo. This unexpected connection between the cornfields of Missouri and the LPG tanks of Kosovo serves as a poignant reminder of the intricate web of interdependence that characterizes our global agricultural and energy systems. The statistically significant correlation coefficient and p-value, akin to two peas in a pod, leave little doubt regarding the robustness of this relationship, prompting us to resist the temptation to dismiss it as a mere "cornspiracy."

The substantial explanatory power of GMO corn production on LPG consumption in Kosovo, illustrated by the coefficient of determination, speaks volumes about the far-reaching influence of agricultural practices on energy dynamics. It seems that the impact of GMO corn production extends beyond the agricultural realm, reaching across continents to shape energy consumption patterns in unexpected ways, much like a cornstalk stretching towards the sun.

As we reap the fruits of our analytical labor, it is clear that this study offers a ripe opportunity for further exploration of the unforeseen connections between seemingly disparate variables. However, given the strength and significance of the observed correlation, it appears that no additional research in this area is warranted. Sometimes, as in the case of GMO corn and LPG usage, the most unexpected pairings yield the most fruitful insights, and it is sometimes best to leave them be, like a well-pollinated cornfield that needs no further tending.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Maizey Connections: Exploring the Correlation between GMO Corn in Missouri and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Kosovo. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Transnational Crop Science


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Maizey Connections: Exploring the Correlation between GMO Corn in Missouri and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Kosovo. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Institute for Global Agricultural Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Maizey Connections: Exploring the Correlation between GMO Corn in Missouri and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Kosovo with an abstract of This paper investigates the often overlooked interplay between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Missouri and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Kosovo. Drawing on data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Energy Information Administration, our research team employed rigorous statistical analysis to elucidate this obscure connection. The correlation coefficient of 0.9202476 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning 2008 to 2021 reveal a compelling relationship deserving of further inquiry. Our findings offer an intriguing insight into the unexpectedly far-reaching implications of agricultural practices, as well as energy usage patterns, on a global scale. This study underscores the importance of examining unconventional associations and not dismissing them as mere coincornidences.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn in Missouri, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) usage in Kosovo, correlation, genetically modified organisms, corn production, Missouri, consumption, energy patterns, agricultural practices, global implications, statistical analysis, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, p-value, 2008-2021, unconventional associations.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Missouri
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Missouri that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Missouri

Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo
Detailed data title: Volume of liquefied petroleum gas used consumed in Kosovo in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo

Correlation r = 0.9202476 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8468556 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Missouri) over the 14 years from 2008 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.1E-6. 0.0000031228541695907287000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.00031% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 320,220 random variables You don't actually need 320 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.76, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in corn grown in Missouri (GMO corn %)211719222016109887785
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo (Million Barrels/Day)1.394541.461921.430141.461921.362841.144110.9852051.112331.1241.040310.9852050.9534250.8755470.920674




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([21,17,19,22,20,16,10,9,8,8,7,7,8,5,])
array_2 = np.array([1.39454,1.46192,1.43014,1.46192,1.36284,1.14411,0.985205,1.11233,1.124,1.04031,0.985205,0.953425,0.875547,0.920674,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Missouri"
array_2_name = "Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 1367 · Black Variable ID: 731 · Red Variable ID: 24602
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0