Report an error
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Burglaries in Oklahoma | r=0.97 | 14yrs | No |
GMO use in cotton | r=0.95 | 14yrs | No |
GMO use in corn grown in Missouri | r=0.92 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Asthma attacks in American children | r=0.92 | 12yrs | No |
The divorce rate in Maine | r=0.91 | 14yrs | No |
Asthma attacks in American children | r=0.86 | 12yrs | No |
Air pollution in Tulsa, Oklahoma | r=0.82 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Season wins for the New York Jets | r=0.74 | 14yrs | Yes! |
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Kosovo also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)