about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,288 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts and the second variable is U.S. hotel industry occupancy rate.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2014, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts decreased, there was a surplus of expertise in handling complex systems. This expertise inadvertently led to a highly efficient and smooth operation of hotel equipment and facilities, resulting in a surge in the U.S. hotel industry occupancy rate. Who knew that mixing chemicals would lead to such a 'suite' success in the hotel industry!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a small industrial town in Massachusetts, with a row of idle chemical equipment in the foreground. Fewer workers are seen tending to the machines. Alongside the industrial setting, depict a local hotel with a steady stream of travelers entering, their suitcases thumping against the polished floor. The hotel lobby should be depicted as bustling with activity, showing guests seeking respite in the comfortable rooms, drawn by the promise of adventure and new beginnings. The entire scene should be depicted in a cute art illustration style, with attention to small details and vibrant colors. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: "Massachusetts chemical equipment operators and tenders decreased, leading to a surge in U.S. hotel industry occupancy rate. As chemical workers vanished, the scent of productivity wafted through the air, luring travelers to hotel rooms in search of the elusive aroma of success.". Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A Discovery magazine cover image Voxel art Cyber folk Cutsy art illustration Realistic
ChatGPT: Cutsy art illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. "Massachusetts chemical equipment operators and tenders decreased, leading to a surge in U.S. hotel industry occupancy rate. As chemical workers vanished, the scent of productivity wafted through the air, luring travelers to hotel rooms in search of the elusive aroma of success."
ChatGPT: In a small industrial town in Massachusetts, a row of chemical equipment sat idle, with fewer workers tending to the machines. As the machines grew quiet, a steady stream of travelers filled the local hotel, their suitcases thumping against the polished floor. The hotel lobby buzzed with activity, as guests sought respite in the comfortable rooms, drawn by the promise of adventure and new beginnings.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cutsy art illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a small industrial town in Massachusetts, a row of chemical equipment sat idle, with fewer workers tending to the machines. As the machines grew quiet, a steady stream of travelers filled the local hotel, their suitcases thumping against the polished floor. The hotel lobby buzzed with activity, as guests sought respite in the comfortable rooms, drawn by the promise of adventure and new beginnings. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a small industrial town in Massachusetts, with a row of idle chemical equipment in the foreground. Fewer workers are seen tending to the machines. Alongside the industrial setting, depict a local hotel with a steady stream of travelers entering, their suitcases thumping against the polished floor. The hotel lobby should be depicted as bustling with activity, showing guests seeking respite in the comfortable rooms, drawn by the promise of adventure and new beginnings. The entire scene should be depicted in a cute art illustration style, with attention to small details and vibrant colors.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts caused U.S. hotel industry occupancy rate to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Chemical Conundrum: An Examination of the Correlation Between Chemical Equipment Operators and Tenders in Massachusetts and U.S. Hotel Industry Occupancy Rates

The Journal of Occupational Chemistry and Hospitality Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts and U.S. hotel industry occupancy rate. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2014.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Chemical Conundrum: An Examination of the Correlation Between Chemical Equipment Operators and Tenders in Massachusetts and U.S. Hotel Industry Occupancy Rates

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in the state of Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we unravel the statistical intricacies that intertwine these seemingly disparate elements. Our analysis reveals a noteworthy correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2003 to 2014, shedding light on the intricate dance between chemical equipment operations and hotel accommodation tendencies. Join us as we uncover the unsuspected interplay between these industries, proving that even in the most unexpected places, the chemicals concoct an intriguing tale.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts and U.S. hotel industry occupancy rate. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Chemical Conundrum: An Examination of the Correlation Between Chemical Equipment Operators and Tenders in Massachusetts and U.S. Hotel Industry Occupancy Rates

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in the state of Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we unravel the statistical intricacies that intertwine these seemingly disparate elements. Our analysis reveals a noteworthy correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2003 to 2014, shedding light on the intricate dance between chemical equipment operations and hotel accommodation tendencies. Join us as we uncover the unsuspected interplay between these industries, proving that even in the most unexpected places, the chemicals concoct an intriguing tale.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Beneath the facade of routine statistical analyses and austere data points lies a tale of unlikely connections and covert correlations. This study sets out to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in the state of Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry. As we embark on this adventure, we must keep our beakers full and our minds open, for this journey promises to be a concoction of statistical intrigue and unexpected revelations.

The chemical industry, often perceived as the domain of lab coats and test tubes, dances an unexpected tango with the glitzy world of hospitality. While one deals with compounds and concoctions, the other spins a web of accommodation and hospitality. Yet, as the data elegantly unveils, these seemingly disparate industries undeniably intertwine in a beguiling symphony of numerals.

Our investigation spans the years 2003 to 2014, a period teeming with economic ebbs and flows, as well as chemical concoctions galore. With data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we meticulously dissect the statistical intricacies that bind these industries. With a correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 and statistical significance reaching the coveted p < 0.01, the symphony of numbers harmonize to reveal an unexpected rapport between chemical equipment operations and hotel occupancy tendencies.

As we embark on this voyage of discovery, let us keep our protective goggles on and our wit sharp, for the chemical conundrum we are about to unravel might just permeate our understanding of the intricate dance of industries. So, join us as we uncork the bottle of statistical intrigue and inhale the heady aroma of connections that transcend the bounds of conventional wisdom. After all, in the world of research, curiosity is the best catalyst to unlock the mysteries that permeate our everyday existence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts and U.S. hotel industry occupancy rate. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Chemical Conundrum: An Examination of the Correlation Between Chemical Equipment Operators and Tenders in Massachusetts and U.S. Hotel Industry Occupancy Rates

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in the state of Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we unravel the statistical intricacies that intertwine these seemingly disparate elements. Our analysis reveals a noteworthy correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2003 to 2014, shedding light on the intricate dance between chemical equipment operations and hotel accommodation tendencies. Join us as we uncover the unsuspected interplay between these industries, proving that even in the most unexpected places, the chemicals concoct an intriguing tale.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Beneath the facade of routine statistical analyses and austere data points lies a tale of unlikely connections and covert correlations. This study sets out to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in the state of Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry. As we embark on this adventure, we must keep our beakers full and our minds open, for this journey promises to be a concoction of statistical intrigue and unexpected revelations.
The chemical industry, often perceived as the domain of lab coats and test tubes, dances an unexpected tango with the glitzy world of hospitality. While one deals with compounds and concoctions, the other spins a web of accommodation and hospitality. Yet, as the data elegantly unveils, these seemingly disparate industries undeniably intertwine in a beguiling symphony of numerals.
Our investigation spans the years 2003 to 2014, a period teeming with economic ebbs and flows, as well as chemical concoctions galore. With data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we meticulously dissect the statistical intricacies that bind these industries. With a correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 and statistical significance reaching the coveted p < 0.01, the symphony of numbers harmonize to reveal an unexpected rapport between chemical equipment operations and hotel occupancy tendencies.
As we embark on this voyage of discovery, let us keep our protective goggles on and our wit sharp, for the chemical conundrum we are about to unravel might just permeate our understanding of the intricate dance of industries. So, join us as we uncork the bottle of statistical intrigue and inhale the heady aroma of connections that transcend the bounds of conventional wisdom. After all, in the world of research, curiosity is the best catalyst to unlock the mysteries that permeate our everyday existence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The enigmatic entanglement of seemingly unrelated industries has long been a source of intrigue for researchers and scholars alike. As we delve into the curious correlation between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry, we are met with a landscape rich in unexpected intersections and statistical serendipity. Smith et al. (2010) set the stage by examining the economic ramifications of chemical industry fluctuations on adjacent sectors, laying the groundwork for our exploration into the unanticipated dance between chemistry and accommodation.

Turning our attention to more theoretical underpinnings, the seminal work of Doe (2015) provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the complex web of connections that underpin industrial symbiosis. This work offers valuable insights into the intertwining of seemingly incongruent sectors, stretching the boundaries of traditional economic analysis.

As we prepare to wade deeper into this conundrum, let us not overlook the invaluable contributions of Jones (2018), whose meticulous study sheds light on the nuanced interplay between labor dynamics and the ebb and flow of hotel occupancy rates. The intricate web of statistical nuances uncovered by these esteemed authors forms the scaffolding upon which our investigation is built.

Steering towards a more unconventional trajectory, let us consider works that, although not directly related to our focal point, offer invaluable insights into the psyche of industries. In "The Chemistry of Connection" by Bond (2012), the author investigates the human propensity to form unexpected bonds, a phenomenon we dare say extends to industries themselves. Recognizing the anthropomorphic tendencies of industries might just be the key to unlocking the enigmatic correlation between chemical equipment operators and hotel occupancy rates.

The fictional realm, too, beckons us with intriguing prospects. "The Hotel Paradox" by Austen (1817) artfully conflates social intricacies with the aura of hospitality, offering an unorthodox lens through which to view our own investigation. On a more contemporary note, "The Chemical Conundrum" by Grisham (2019) reveals a world where legal intricacies meet the realm of chemical discoveries, mirroring, perhaps, the unexpected entanglements we seek to unravel in our own study.

In the realm of cinematic expressions, we cannot disregard the influence of visual narratives on our perception of industry dynamics. "Chemical Equilibrium" (2002) presents a poignant exploration of the delicate balance between opposing forces, a theme elusive yet tantalizingly familiar in our current pursuit.

As we embark on this journey, let us keep in mind that the most unexpected sources often harbor hidden connections. The whimsical interplay of literature, cinema, and empirical research offers us a vibrant palette to illuminate the intricate dance of industries. So, with our proverbial lab coats donned and our research goggles firmly in place, we venture forth into this chemical conundrum, knowing full well that beneath the veneer of statistical analysis lies a trove of unexpected surprises and maybe even a dash of statistical hilarity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts and U.S. hotel industry occupancy rate. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Statista . You used data from 2003 to 2014

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Chemical Conundrum: An Examination of the Correlation Between Chemical Equipment Operators and Tenders in Massachusetts and U.S. Hotel Industry Occupancy Rates

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in the state of Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we unravel the statistical intricacies that intertwine these seemingly disparate elements. Our analysis reveals a noteworthy correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2003 to 2014, shedding light on the intricate dance between chemical equipment operations and hotel accommodation tendencies. Join us as we uncover the unsuspected interplay between these industries, proving that even in the most unexpected places, the chemicals concoct an intriguing tale.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Beneath the facade of routine statistical analyses and austere data points lies a tale of unlikely connections and covert correlations. This study sets out to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in the state of Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry. As we embark on this adventure, we must keep our beakers full and our minds open, for this journey promises to be a concoction of statistical intrigue and unexpected revelations.
The chemical industry, often perceived as the domain of lab coats and test tubes, dances an unexpected tango with the glitzy world of hospitality. While one deals with compounds and concoctions, the other spins a web of accommodation and hospitality. Yet, as the data elegantly unveils, these seemingly disparate industries undeniably intertwine in a beguiling symphony of numerals.
Our investigation spans the years 2003 to 2014, a period teeming with economic ebbs and flows, as well as chemical concoctions galore. With data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we meticulously dissect the statistical intricacies that bind these industries. With a correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 and statistical significance reaching the coveted p < 0.01, the symphony of numbers harmonize to reveal an unexpected rapport between chemical equipment operations and hotel occupancy tendencies.
As we embark on this voyage of discovery, let us keep our protective goggles on and our wit sharp, for the chemical conundrum we are about to unravel might just permeate our understanding of the intricate dance of industries. So, join us as we uncork the bottle of statistical intrigue and inhale the heady aroma of connections that transcend the bounds of conventional wisdom. After all, in the world of research, curiosity is the best catalyst to unlock the mysteries that permeate our everyday existence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

For this study, we harnessed a potent mix of data collection methods and statistical techniques to unveil the nuanced relationship between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts and the U.S. hotel industry occupancy rates.

Data Collection:
Our research team scoured the digital landscape far and wide, employing a concoction of web scraping, data mining, and statistical alchemy to harvest data from reliable sources, such as the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista. The data spanned the years 2003 to 2014, capturing a wide expanse of economic and industrial phenomena.

Ingredient Identification:
With the data in hand, we meticulously sifted through the numerical brew, identifying the relevant variables pertinent to our inquiry. The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts formed the primary component, while the U.S. hotel industry occupancy rates served as the complementary garnish for our statistical feast.

Statistical Recipe:
Employing a blend of correlation analysis and regression modeling, we stirred the numerical stew to uncover hidden patterns and potential relationships between the variables. The statistical software acted as our trusty sous chef, aiding in the extraction of meaningful insights from the data concoction.

Delving into the Statistical Potions:
Our statistical journey began with the computation of correlation coefficients, allowing us to gauge the strength and direction of the relationship between chemical equipment operations and hotel occupancy tendencies. Following this, we dabbled in regression modeling to understand how changes in the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts could potentially influence the U.S. hotel industry occupancy rates.

Controlled Blending:
To ensure the robustness of our findings, we implemented stringent controls to account for extraneous variables that could potentially cloud the clarity of our statistical elixir. This involved delicately adjusting the statistical seasoning to remove any confounding factors that might skew our analyses.

Validity and Reliability Assurance:
As we concluded the statistical cooking process, we scrutinized our results to ascertain the validity and reliability of our findings. This involved subjecting our statistical dishes to rigorous tests and cross-validation procedures to ensure that the flavors of our inferences were not merely a result of statistical happenstance.

In summary, our methodology comprised a meticulous melange of data retrieval, statistical seasoning, and analytical alchemy to uncover the hidden interplay between chemical equipment operations and hotel occupancy tendencies. With our potions brewed and our statistical cauldron aglow, we were ready to serve up the findings that would, undoubtedly, whet the intellectual appetites of the academic palate.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts and U.S. hotel industry occupancy rate. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Statista .

For the time period 2003 to 2014, you found a correlation -0.8487466, r-squared of 0.7203707, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Chemical Conundrum: An Examination of the Correlation Between Chemical Equipment Operators and Tenders in Massachusetts and U.S. Hotel Industry Occupancy Rates

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in the state of Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we unravel the statistical intricacies that intertwine these seemingly disparate elements. Our analysis reveals a noteworthy correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2003 to 2014, shedding light on the intricate dance between chemical equipment operations and hotel accommodation tendencies. Join us as we uncover the unsuspected interplay between these industries, proving that even in the most unexpected places, the chemicals concoct an intriguing tale.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Beneath the facade of routine statistical analyses and austere data points lies a tale of unlikely connections and covert correlations. This study sets out to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in the state of Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry. As we embark on this adventure, we must keep our beakers full and our minds open, for this journey promises to be a concoction of statistical intrigue and unexpected revelations.
The chemical industry, often perceived as the domain of lab coats and test tubes, dances an unexpected tango with the glitzy world of hospitality. While one deals with compounds and concoctions, the other spins a web of accommodation and hospitality. Yet, as the data elegantly unveils, these seemingly disparate industries undeniably intertwine in a beguiling symphony of numerals.
Our investigation spans the years 2003 to 2014, a period teeming with economic ebbs and flows, as well as chemical concoctions galore. With data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we meticulously dissect the statistical intricacies that bind these industries. With a correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 and statistical significance reaching the coveted p < 0.01, the symphony of numbers harmonize to reveal an unexpected rapport between chemical equipment operations and hotel occupancy tendencies.
As we embark on this voyage of discovery, let us keep our protective goggles on and our wit sharp, for the chemical conundrum we are about to unravel might just permeate our understanding of the intricate dance of industries. So, join us as we uncork the bottle of statistical intrigue and inhale the heady aroma of connections that transcend the bounds of conventional wisdom. After all, in the world of research, curiosity is the best catalyst to unlock the mysteries that permeate our everyday existence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data gathered from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista unfurls a tale of shimmering correlations and unexpected liaisons. During the time period from 2003 to 2014, our research uncovered a substantial correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in the state of Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry. With this correlation coefficient came an r-squared value of 0.7203707, indicating the strength of the relationship between these seemingly incongruent domains.

The eye-catching figure (Fig. 1) featured in this paper illustrates the robust negative correlation, showcasing the unmistakably synchronized dance between the variables. This scatterplot showcases the inverse relationship between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts and the hotel industry occupancy rates. The figure is a testament to the unexpected synergy between these seemingly unrelated sectors and serves as a vivid visualization of the statistical intrigue at play.

The noteworthy statistical significance, with p < 0.01, further cements the statistical relevance of the correlation between these industries. This finding speaks volumes about the persuasive influence of chemical equipment operations on the hospitality domain, and underscores the remarkable tug-of-war between chemical compositions and hotel accommodations.

In conclusion, the results of this research not only shed light on the intertwined industries of chemical equipment operations and hotel occupancy but also serve as a reminder that, in the world of statistics, even the most unexpected pairs can dance to the same rhythm. Thus, the chemical conundrum reveals itself to be a cocktail of statistical serendipity and unanticipated revelations, demonstrating that behind the veneer of ordinary data lies a world of fascinating connections waiting to be uncovered.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts and U.S. hotel industry occupancy rate. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Chemical Conundrum: An Examination of the Correlation Between Chemical Equipment Operators and Tenders in Massachusetts and U.S. Hotel Industry Occupancy Rates

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in the state of Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we unravel the statistical intricacies that intertwine these seemingly disparate elements. Our analysis reveals a noteworthy correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2003 to 2014, shedding light on the intricate dance between chemical equipment operations and hotel accommodation tendencies. Join us as we uncover the unsuspected interplay between these industries, proving that even in the most unexpected places, the chemicals concoct an intriguing tale.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The enigmatic entanglement of seemingly unrelated industries has long been a source of intrigue for researchers and scholars alike. As we delve into the curious correlation between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry, we are met with a landscape rich in unexpected intersections and statistical serendipity. Smith et al. (2010) set the stage by examining the economic ramifications of chemical industry fluctuations on adjacent sectors, laying the groundwork for our exploration into the unanticipated dance between chemistry and accommodation.
Turning our attention to more theoretical underpinnings, the seminal work of Doe (2015) provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the complex web of connections that underpin industrial symbiosis. This work offers valuable insights into the intertwining of seemingly incongruent sectors, stretching the boundaries of traditional economic analysis.
As we prepare to wade deeper into this conundrum, let us not overlook the invaluable contributions of Jones (2018), whose meticulous study sheds light on the nuanced interplay between labor dynamics and the ebb and flow of hotel occupancy rates. The intricate web of statistical nuances uncovered by these esteemed authors forms the scaffolding upon which our investigation is built.
Steering towards a more unconventional trajectory, let us consider works that, although not directly related to our focal point, offer invaluable insights into the psyche of industries. In "The Chemistry of Connection" by Bond (2012), the author investigates the human propensity to form unexpected bonds, a phenomenon we dare say extends to industries themselves. Recognizing the anthropomorphic tendencies of industries might just be the key to unlocking the enigmatic correlation between chemical equipment operators and hotel occupancy rates.
The fictional realm, too, beckons us with intriguing prospects. "The Hotel Paradox" by Austen (1817) artfully conflates social intricacies with the aura of hospitality, offering an unorthodox lens through which to view our own investigation. On a more contemporary note, "The Chemical Conundrum" by Grisham (2019) reveals a world where legal intricacies meet the realm of chemical discoveries, mirroring, perhaps, the unexpected entanglements we seek to unravel in our own study.
In the realm of cinematic expressions, we cannot disregard the influence of visual narratives on our perception of industry dynamics. "Chemical Equilibrium" (2002) presents a poignant exploration of the delicate balance between opposing forces, a theme elusive yet tantalizingly familiar in our current pursuit.
As we embark on this journey, let us keep in mind that the most unexpected sources often harbor hidden connections. The whimsical interplay of literature, cinema, and empirical research offers us a vibrant palette to illuminate the intricate dance of industries. So, with our proverbial lab coats donned and our research goggles firmly in place, we venture forth into this chemical conundrum, knowing full well that beneath the veneer of statistical analysis lies a trove of unexpected surprises and maybe even a dash of statistical hilarity.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data gathered from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista unfurls a tale of shimmering correlations and unexpected liaisons. During the time period from 2003 to 2014, our research uncovered a substantial correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in the state of Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry. With this correlation coefficient came an r-squared value of 0.7203707, indicating the strength of the relationship between these seemingly incongruent domains.
The eye-catching figure (Fig. 1) featured in this paper illustrates the robust negative correlation, showcasing the unmistakably synchronized dance between the variables. This scatterplot showcases the inverse relationship between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts and the hotel industry occupancy rates. The figure is a testament to the unexpected synergy between these seemingly unrelated sectors and serves as a vivid visualization of the statistical intrigue at play.
The noteworthy statistical significance, with p < 0.01, further cements the statistical relevance of the correlation between these industries. This finding speaks volumes about the persuasive influence of chemical equipment operations on the hospitality domain, and underscores the remarkable tug-of-war between chemical compositions and hotel accommodations.
In conclusion, the results of this research not only shed light on the intertwined industries of chemical equipment operations and hotel occupancy but also serve as a reminder that, in the world of statistics, even the most unexpected pairs can dance to the same rhythm. Thus, the chemical conundrum reveals itself to be a cocktail of statistical serendipity and unanticipated revelations, demonstrating that behind the veneer of ordinary data lies a world of fascinating connections waiting to be uncovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study illuminate a captivating correlation between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry. Our findings not only confirm the earlier research conducted by Smith et al. (2010) on the economic impact of chemical industry fluctuations but also provide a statistical lens through which to appreciate the interplay between these seemingly incongruent domains. The substantial negative correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 and the r-squared value of 0.7203707 echo the assertions put forth by Doe (2015) regarding the complex web of connections that underpin industrial symbiosis. In particular, the statistical significance with p < 0.01 fortifies the empirical evidence for the unexpected dance between chemical equipment operations and hotel accommodations, underscoring the nuanced interplay recognized by Jones (2018). It seems that the intertwining of these industries may indeed be a chemical romance, maintaining a profoundly influential and inversely related dynamic.

Our findings further accentuate the idiosyncratic natures of industries, echoing the suppositions of Bond (2012) on the human penchant for forming unexpected bonds. Indeed, this is a reminder that industries themselves exhibit a proclivity for unexpected liaisons, inspiring a symphony of statistical elegance and noteworthy intrigue. This revelatory study stands as a testament to the serendipitous connections that underpin the intricate web of industrial dynamics, demonstrating that, much like the chemical compounds themselves, a curious dance of statistical associations is always in flux.

As we proceed in our endeavor to unravel the enigmatic link between chemical equipment operations and hotel occupancy rates, let us not forget that the most unexpected sources have often harbored hidden connections. Just as Grisham (2019) reveals a world where legal intricacies meet the sphere of chemical discoveries, this study uncovers a world where the chemical and accommodation industries engage in a complex dance of statistical significance. Thus, we are reminded that, beneath the veneer of statistical analyses, lies a trove of unexpected surprises, and maybe even a touch of statistical whimsy.

In our ongoing quest to illuminate the unexpected connections that underlie industrial dynamics, we must appreciate that statistical serendipity is often the precursor to profound revelations. So, with a nod to Austen's "The Hotel Paradox" and the poignant exploration of the delicate balance between opposing forces in "Chemical Equilibrium," we venture forth into this fascinating chemical conundrum, knowing full well that beneath the guise of ordinary data lies a world of captivating connections waiting to be uncovered. This study serves as a reminder that, in the world of statistics, even the most unexpected pairs can find harmony, and perhaps even a hint of statistical humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts and U.S. hotel industry occupancy rate. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Chemical Conundrum: An Examination of the Correlation Between Chemical Equipment Operators and Tenders in Massachusetts and U.S. Hotel Industry Occupancy Rates

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in the state of Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we unravel the statistical intricacies that intertwine these seemingly disparate elements. Our analysis reveals a noteworthy correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2003 to 2014, shedding light on the intricate dance between chemical equipment operations and hotel accommodation tendencies. Join us as we uncover the unsuspected interplay between these industries, proving that even in the most unexpected places, the chemicals concoct an intriguing tale.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Beneath the facade of routine statistical analyses and austere data points lies a tale of unlikely connections and covert correlations. This study sets out to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in the state of Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry. As we embark on this adventure, we must keep our beakers full and our minds open, for this journey promises to be a concoction of statistical intrigue and unexpected revelations.
The chemical industry, often perceived as the domain of lab coats and test tubes, dances an unexpected tango with the glitzy world of hospitality. While one deals with compounds and concoctions, the other spins a web of accommodation and hospitality. Yet, as the data elegantly unveils, these seemingly disparate industries undeniably intertwine in a beguiling symphony of numerals.
Our investigation spans the years 2003 to 2014, a period teeming with economic ebbs and flows, as well as chemical concoctions galore. With data sourced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we meticulously dissect the statistical intricacies that bind these industries. With a correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 and statistical significance reaching the coveted p < 0.01, the symphony of numbers harmonize to reveal an unexpected rapport between chemical equipment operations and hotel occupancy tendencies.
As we embark on this voyage of discovery, let us keep our protective goggles on and our wit sharp, for the chemical conundrum we are about to unravel might just permeate our understanding of the intricate dance of industries. So, join us as we uncork the bottle of statistical intrigue and inhale the heady aroma of connections that transcend the bounds of conventional wisdom. After all, in the world of research, curiosity is the best catalyst to unlock the mysteries that permeate our everyday existence.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data gathered from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista unfurls a tale of shimmering correlations and unexpected liaisons. During the time period from 2003 to 2014, our research uncovered a substantial correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in the state of Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry. With this correlation coefficient came an r-squared value of 0.7203707, indicating the strength of the relationship between these seemingly incongruent domains.
The eye-catching figure (Fig. 1) featured in this paper illustrates the robust negative correlation, showcasing the unmistakably synchronized dance between the variables. This scatterplot showcases the inverse relationship between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts and the hotel industry occupancy rates. The figure is a testament to the unexpected synergy between these seemingly unrelated sectors and serves as a vivid visualization of the statistical intrigue at play.
The noteworthy statistical significance, with p < 0.01, further cements the statistical relevance of the correlation between these industries. This finding speaks volumes about the persuasive influence of chemical equipment operations on the hospitality domain, and underscores the remarkable tug-of-war between chemical compositions and hotel accommodations.
In conclusion, the results of this research not only shed light on the intertwined industries of chemical equipment operations and hotel occupancy but also serve as a reminder that, in the world of statistics, even the most unexpected pairs can dance to the same rhythm. Thus, the chemical conundrum reveals itself to be a cocktail of statistical serendipity and unanticipated revelations, demonstrating that behind the veneer of ordinary data lies a world of fascinating connections waiting to be uncovered.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has uncorked a vintage bottle of statistical intrigue, revealing a compelling correlation between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry. The robust negative correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 has illuminated the unexpected tango between these seemingly incongruous industries. Our findings have highlighted the persuasive influence of chemical operations on the ebb and flow of hotel accommodations, showcasing an interplay that could rival any theatrical performance.

The visual depiction of this correlation in our scatterplot (Fig. 1) serves as a quaint reminder that even in the realm of statistics, unexpected pairs can waltz their way into a compelling narrative. This unanticipated connection between the chemical and hotel industries not only challenges conventional wisdom but also adds a nuanced dimension to our understanding of economic interdependencies.

As we bid adieu to this statistical symphony, it becomes evident that no more research is needed in this area. After all, we have stirred the statistical pot and uncovered a concoction of connections that will keep us pondering for years to come.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Chemical Conundrum: An Examination of the Correlation Between Chemical Equipment Operators and Tenders in Massachusetts and U.S. Hotel Industry Occupancy Rates. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Occupational Chemistry and Hospitality Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Chemical Conundrum: An Examination of the Correlation Between Chemical Equipment Operators and Tenders in Massachusetts and U.S. Hotel Industry Occupancy Rates. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for the Advancement of Chemical Industry Research (SACIR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Chemical Conundrum: An Examination of the Correlation Between Chemical Equipment Operators and Tenders in Massachusetts and U.S. Hotel Industry Occupancy Rates with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the curious relationship between the number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in the state of Massachusetts and the occupancy rates of the U.S. hotel industry. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Statista, we unravel the statistical intricacies that intertwine these seemingly disparate elements. Our analysis reveals a noteworthy correlation coefficient of -0.8487466 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2003 to 2014, shedding light on the intricate dance between chemical equipment operations and hotel accommodation tendencies. Join us as we uncover the unsuspected interplay between these industries, proving that even in the most unexpected places, the chemicals concoct an intriguing tale.

ChatGPT:

chemical equipment operators, tenders, Massachusetts, U.S. hotel industry, occupancy rates, correlation, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Statista, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, 2003-2014, chemical industry, hotel industry, Massachusetts industry data

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts

U.S. hotel industry occupancy rate
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with U.S. hotel industry occupancy rate

Correlation r = -0.8487466 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7203707 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 72% of the change in the one variable (i.e., U.S. hotel industry occupancy rate) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts) over the 12 years from 2003 through 2014.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.000481. 0.0004808765785474763500000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as -0.85 in 0.0481% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,080 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 11 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 11 because we have two variables measured over a period of 12 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ -0.96, -0.54 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014
The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts (Laborers)91073081081080085010501000800770660580
U.S. hotel industry occupancy rate (Rate Percentage)59.261.36363.262.859.854.657.559.961.362.363.8




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
  5. Inverted Y-axis: I inverted the Y-axis on the chart above so that the lines would move together. This is visually pleasing, but not at all intuitive. Below is a line graph that does not invert the Y-axis.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([910,730,810,810,800,850,1050,1000,800,770,660,580,])
array_2 = np.array([59.2,61.3,63,63.2,62.8,59.8,54.6,57.5,59.9,61.3,62.3,63.8,])
array_1_name = "The number of chemical equipment operators and tenders in Massachusetts"
array_2_name = "U.S. hotel industry occupancy rate"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 1288 · Black Variable ID: 9565 · Red Variable ID: 208
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0