about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,263 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Electricity generation in Antarctica and the second variable is Total runs scored in the World Series.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2013, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As electricity generation in Antarctica decreased, scientists believe that penguins became less distracted by bright lights and were able to focus more on playing baseball. This led to a decrease in errors and ultimately a decrease in the total runs scored in the World Series. With the penguins honing their baseball skills, it's no wonder the games became more competitive and lower scoring.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create a visually striking black-and-white newspaper illustration of a baseball stadium scene. Depict the bright floodlights casting dimmer-than-usual illumination onto the field. Show the players swinging their bats with determination, capturing the absence of the usual electrifying crackling sound indicating powerful hits. The crowd should be portrayed as subdued, with expressions of disappointment and surprise. The scoreboard, prominently displayed, should show a lower total of runs scored than expected. Finally, subtly illustrate the influence of the lack of polar power from Antarctica on the energy of the game. Capture the essence of the scene in a simple yet evocative design. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Because the decrease in electricity generation in Antarctica led to a shortage of polar power, the batters in the World Series couldn't catch a charge, resulting in fewer electrifying hits and lower total runs scored. It was a shocking turn of events as the players struggled to amp up their performance without the spark of Antarctic electricity to light up the game.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Vaporwave Art nouveau A black-and-white newspaper illustration 3D Pixar Style Futuristic
ChatGPT: A black-and-white newspaper illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Because the decrease in electricity generation in Antarctica led to a shortage of polar power, the batters in the World Series couldn't catch a charge, resulting in fewer electrifying hits and lower total runs scored. It was a shocking turn of events as the players struggled to amp up their performance without the spark of Antarctic electricity to light up the game.
ChatGPT: In a baseball stadium, the bright floodlights normally shining down on the field are dimmer than usual. The players are swinging their bats but the crackling sound of electrifying hits is noticeably absent. The crowd seems subdued, and the scoreboard shows a lower total of runs scored than expected. The lack of polar power from Antarctica has clearly affected the energy of the game.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A black-and-white newspaper illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a baseball stadium, the bright floodlights normally shining down on the field are dimmer than usual. The players are swinging their bats but the crackling sound of electrifying hits is noticeably absent. The crowd seems subdued, and the scoreboard shows a lower total of runs scored than expected. The lack of polar power from Antarctica has clearly affected the energy of the game. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create a visually striking black-and-white newspaper illustration of a baseball stadium scene. Depict the bright floodlights casting dimmer-than-usual illumination onto the field. Show the players swinging their bats with determination, capturing the absence of the usual electrifying crackling sound indicating powerful hits. The crowd should be portrayed as subdued, with expressions of disappointment and surprise. The scoreboard, prominently displayed, should show a lower total of runs scored than expected. Finally, subtly illustrate the influence of the lack of polar power from Antarctica on the energy of the game. Capture the essence of the scene in a simple yet evocative design.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Electricity generation in Antarctica caused Total runs scored in the World Series to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Shocking Statistics: Exploring the Electrifying Link Between Electricity Generation in Antarctica and Total Runs Scored in the World Series

The Journal of Polar Power and Baseball Metrics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Antarctica and Total runs scored in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7544545 and p < 0.05 for 2005 to 2013.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Statistics: Exploring the Electrifying Link Between Electricity Generation in Antarctica and Total Runs Scored in the World Series"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Electricity generation in Antarctica and total runs scored in the World Series may seem as unrelated as penguins and baseball, but our study delves into the shocking possible connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we embarked on a quest to illuminate this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7544545 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning 2005 to 2013. This paper presents the electrifying evidence and findings from our pun-intended "chilling" investigation into this unusual association.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Antarctica and Total runs scored in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Statistics: Exploring the Electrifying Link Between Electricity Generation in Antarctica and Total Runs Scored in the World Series"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Electricity generation in Antarctica and total runs scored in the World Series may seem as unrelated as penguins and baseball, but our study delves into the shocking possible connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we embarked on a quest to illuminate this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7544545 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning 2005 to 2013. This paper presents the electrifying evidence and findings from our pun-intended "chilling" investigation into this unusual association.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The burgeoning fields of energy economics and sports analytics have brought forth a multitude of unexpected and eccentric correlations that shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables. In this regard, our research seeks to uncover the hitherto overlooked connection between the production of electricity in Antarctica and the total runs scored in the World Series. While on the surface the juxtaposition of polar power generation and baseball may seem as incongruous as a snowball fight in the Sahara, our study aims to show that beneath this frosty facade lies a potentially electrifying relationship.

Over the years, researchers have passionately pursued statistical insights in the most unlikely of places, from the relationship between cheese consumption and the number of people who died from becoming tangled in their bedsheets (yes, that is a real study) to the connection between the number of serial killers and the consumption of margarine (no, we're not making this up). In the same spirit, we embarked on our own peculiar quest, navigating through troves of data and statistical analyses to explore this curious pairing of variables.

The overarching goal of our investigation is not only to highlight the statistical association between these two distinct phenomena but to also unravel the underlying mechanisms that may drive such a correlation. While some may view our pursuit as akin to trying to find a polar bear in a blizzard, our findings beckon us to challenge conventional thinking and consider the unexplored interplay between the icy continent's energy output and America's favorite pastime.

As we delve into the intricacies of this hitherto uncharted territory, it is imperative to approach this analysis with an open mind and a willingness to embrace the unexpected. Our endeavor, much like navigating through a maze of statistical significance, paves the way for a compelling exploration into the realms of both energy economics and sports statistics. So, let us embark on this scientific sleuthing expedition, armed with data, statistics, and perhaps a metaphorical pair of snowshoes, as we unravel the mystery behind the improbable correlation between Antarctic electricity generation and the total runs scored in the World Series.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Antarctica and Total runs scored in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Statistics: Exploring the Electrifying Link Between Electricity Generation in Antarctica and Total Runs Scored in the World Series"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Electricity generation in Antarctica and total runs scored in the World Series may seem as unrelated as penguins and baseball, but our study delves into the shocking possible connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we embarked on a quest to illuminate this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7544545 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning 2005 to 2013. This paper presents the electrifying evidence and findings from our pun-intended "chilling" investigation into this unusual association.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The burgeoning fields of energy economics and sports analytics have brought forth a multitude of unexpected and eccentric correlations that shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables. In this regard, our research seeks to uncover the hitherto overlooked connection between the production of electricity in Antarctica and the total runs scored in the World Series. While on the surface the juxtaposition of polar power generation and baseball may seem as incongruous as a snowball fight in the Sahara, our study aims to show that beneath this frosty facade lies a potentially electrifying relationship.
Over the years, researchers have passionately pursued statistical insights in the most unlikely of places, from the relationship between cheese consumption and the number of people who died from becoming tangled in their bedsheets (yes, that is a real study) to the connection between the number of serial killers and the consumption of margarine (no, we're not making this up). In the same spirit, we embarked on our own peculiar quest, navigating through troves of data and statistical analyses to explore this curious pairing of variables.
The overarching goal of our investigation is not only to highlight the statistical association between these two distinct phenomena but to also unravel the underlying mechanisms that may drive such a correlation. While some may view our pursuit as akin to trying to find a polar bear in a blizzard, our findings beckon us to challenge conventional thinking and consider the unexplored interplay between the icy continent's energy output and America's favorite pastime.
As we delve into the intricacies of this hitherto uncharted territory, it is imperative to approach this analysis with an open mind and a willingness to embrace the unexpected. Our endeavor, much like navigating through a maze of statistical significance, paves the way for a compelling exploration into the realms of both energy economics and sports statistics. So, let us embark on this scientific sleuthing expedition, armed with data, statistics, and perhaps a metaphorical pair of snowshoes, as we unravel the mystery behind the improbable correlation between Antarctic electricity generation and the total runs scored in the World Series.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the pursuit of understanding the electrically charged connection between electricity generation in Antarctica and the total runs scored in the World Series, researchers have scoured the academic landscape. Smith et al. (2010) examined the effects of environmental conditions on sporting events, albeit with a more earthly focus, and Doe (2015) shed light on the impact of solar energy on athletic performance. However, as our investigation veers into the realm of the hemispheric extreme, we find ourselves in uncharted territory, much like a bemused penguin encountering a baseball for the first time.

Turning to more general energy-related research, Jones et al. (2012) explored the economic implications of renewable energy sources in cold climates, capturing the essence of our Antarctic energy generation angle. Additionally, "The Economics of Ice and Fire" by Winter and Stark (2019) offers an insightful perspective on power dynamics in extreme environments, albeit of a more fictional ilk.

Drawing inspiration from the world of fiction and the playful twists of chance that bind our realities, we turn to "Icecapades: A Game of Cold Conundrums" and "The Baseball Paradox: A Tale of Two Curves" to infuse our exploration with a sense of whimsy and wonder. Who's to say that the icy tundras of Antarctica and the baseball diamonds of America can't share a cosmic connection?

As we tread through this icy maze of unlikely associations, we recall the uncanny intertwining of chance and strategy in board games such as "Power Grid: Antarctica Expansion" and "Baseball Highlights 2045," each containing a hint of the peculiar convergence we aim to tease out in our research.

The hunt for meaning in the midst of statistical obscurity has led us to view this convergence with not mere curiosity, but with a sportive sense of play. After all, if electricity in Antarctica and runs in the World Series can form an unexpected bond, what other fantastical fusions might the empirical world have in store for us? As we forge ahead in our quest for understanding, we must be prepared to embrace the unexpected, juggle a few puns along the way, and keep our sense of whimsy sharp – much like a well-honed ice pick in the hands of a determined yet slightly eccentric explorer.

And so, armed with knowledge ranging from the plausible to the delightfully improbable, we march forth to illuminate the electrifying connection that awaits us in this frosty and formidable mystery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Antarctica and Total runs scored in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia . You used data from 2005 to 2013

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Statistics: Exploring the Electrifying Link Between Electricity Generation in Antarctica and Total Runs Scored in the World Series"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Electricity generation in Antarctica and total runs scored in the World Series may seem as unrelated as penguins and baseball, but our study delves into the shocking possible connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we embarked on a quest to illuminate this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7544545 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning 2005 to 2013. This paper presents the electrifying evidence and findings from our pun-intended "chilling" investigation into this unusual association.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The burgeoning fields of energy economics and sports analytics have brought forth a multitude of unexpected and eccentric correlations that shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables. In this regard, our research seeks to uncover the hitherto overlooked connection between the production of electricity in Antarctica and the total runs scored in the World Series. While on the surface the juxtaposition of polar power generation and baseball may seem as incongruous as a snowball fight in the Sahara, our study aims to show that beneath this frosty facade lies a potentially electrifying relationship.
Over the years, researchers have passionately pursued statistical insights in the most unlikely of places, from the relationship between cheese consumption and the number of people who died from becoming tangled in their bedsheets (yes, that is a real study) to the connection between the number of serial killers and the consumption of margarine (no, we're not making this up). In the same spirit, we embarked on our own peculiar quest, navigating through troves of data and statistical analyses to explore this curious pairing of variables.
The overarching goal of our investigation is not only to highlight the statistical association between these two distinct phenomena but to also unravel the underlying mechanisms that may drive such a correlation. While some may view our pursuit as akin to trying to find a polar bear in a blizzard, our findings beckon us to challenge conventional thinking and consider the unexplored interplay between the icy continent's energy output and America's favorite pastime.
As we delve into the intricacies of this hitherto uncharted territory, it is imperative to approach this analysis with an open mind and a willingness to embrace the unexpected. Our endeavor, much like navigating through a maze of statistical significance, paves the way for a compelling exploration into the realms of both energy economics and sports statistics. So, let us embark on this scientific sleuthing expedition, armed with data, statistics, and perhaps a metaphorical pair of snowshoes, as we unravel the mystery behind the improbable correlation between Antarctic electricity generation and the total runs scored in the World Series.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To explore the potential connection between electricity generation in Antarctica and total runs scored in the World Series, we employed a multi-faceted methodology that involved equal parts scientific rigor and playful curiosity. Assembling a team of intrepid researchers with a shared penchant for both statistics and sports, we set out on this chilly, figurative journey to uncover any possible sparks flying between these two disparate domains.

Data Collection:
Our data collection process resembled a scientific scavenger hunt, with the internet serving as our sprawling playground. We scoured various sources, ranging from the authoritative Energy Information Administration to the occasionally dubious yet oddly reliable realm of Wikipedia. The energy generation figures for Antarctica were procured from reputable sources, albeit with a degree of trepidation, given the scarcity of readily available, standard datasets for an area known more for ice than kilowatts. Capturing the essence of serendipity, our pursuit also led us to the official record of total runs scored in each World Series game within the specimen years of 2005 to 2013. We then meticulously collated and cross-checked these datasets, treating each number with the solemnity befitting both statistical analysis and safari expedition trophies.

Statistical Analysis:
Unfurling the traditional statistical arsenal of correlation coefficients, p-values, and regression analyses, we sought to tease out any lurking relationships between the wattage of Antarctic power stations and the scoring antics of baseball players. Employing software revered by data wizards and feared by the faint-hearted, we subjected our datasets to rigorous scrutiny, keeping one eye on the results and the other on the clock, for fear of being consumed by the very Antarctic darkness we sought to understand.

Correlation Determination:
In homage to the suspense of Antarctic expeditions, we fervently navigated through the tangled web of statistical tests, ultimately arriving at a correlation coefficient that left us stunned like hapless explorers gazing upon an undiscovered crevasse. The tantalizing coefficient of 0.7544545 beckoned us to examine it with the same incredulous bewilderment as one might reserve for a penguin strolling into a baseball stadium. Accompanied by a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05, our findings thawed the boundaries of conventional statistical significance and propelled us into a realm of unanticipated correlation.

Overall, our methodology, like an adventurous odyssey through uncharted statistical territory, brought us face to face with an association that, while still shrouded in mystery, beckons for further investigation. Our findings are as surprising as finding an iceberg in a desert, and they stand as a testament to the unexpected connections that can emerge when one dares to explore the frosty frontiers of interdisciplinary research.

In the words of the great metaphorical explorer, "Statistically speaking, we've hit a home run in the Antarctic outfields of correlation."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Antarctica and Total runs scored in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2005 to 2013, you found a correlation 0.7544545, r-squared of 0.5692016, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Statistics: Exploring the Electrifying Link Between Electricity Generation in Antarctica and Total Runs Scored in the World Series"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Electricity generation in Antarctica and total runs scored in the World Series may seem as unrelated as penguins and baseball, but our study delves into the shocking possible connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we embarked on a quest to illuminate this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7544545 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning 2005 to 2013. This paper presents the electrifying evidence and findings from our pun-intended "chilling" investigation into this unusual association.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The burgeoning fields of energy economics and sports analytics have brought forth a multitude of unexpected and eccentric correlations that shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables. In this regard, our research seeks to uncover the hitherto overlooked connection between the production of electricity in Antarctica and the total runs scored in the World Series. While on the surface the juxtaposition of polar power generation and baseball may seem as incongruous as a snowball fight in the Sahara, our study aims to show that beneath this frosty facade lies a potentially electrifying relationship.
Over the years, researchers have passionately pursued statistical insights in the most unlikely of places, from the relationship between cheese consumption and the number of people who died from becoming tangled in their bedsheets (yes, that is a real study) to the connection between the number of serial killers and the consumption of margarine (no, we're not making this up). In the same spirit, we embarked on our own peculiar quest, navigating through troves of data and statistical analyses to explore this curious pairing of variables.
The overarching goal of our investigation is not only to highlight the statistical association between these two distinct phenomena but to also unravel the underlying mechanisms that may drive such a correlation. While some may view our pursuit as akin to trying to find a polar bear in a blizzard, our findings beckon us to challenge conventional thinking and consider the unexplored interplay between the icy continent's energy output and America's favorite pastime.
As we delve into the intricacies of this hitherto uncharted territory, it is imperative to approach this analysis with an open mind and a willingness to embrace the unexpected. Our endeavor, much like navigating through a maze of statistical significance, paves the way for a compelling exploration into the realms of both energy economics and sports statistics. So, let us embark on this scientific sleuthing expedition, armed with data, statistics, and perhaps a metaphorical pair of snowshoes, as we unravel the mystery behind the improbable correlation between Antarctic electricity generation and the total runs scored in the World Series.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the curious association between electricity generation in Antarctica and total runs scored in the World Series have yielded some truly electrifying findings. Employing rigorous statistical analyses, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7544545, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between the two variables. This unexpected connection between polar power and America's pastime has raised more than a few eyebrows in the scientific community.

The calculated r-squared value of 0.5692016 further underscores the substantial influence of Antarctic electricity generation on the total runs scored in the World Series. The proportion of variance in total runs scored that can be explained by the variance in electricity generation in Antarctica is indeed notable, prompting us to contemplate the potential implications of such an association.

In line with conventional statistical practices, our findings also revealed a p-value of less than 0.05, emphasizing the statistical significance of the observed relationship. This robust evidence challenges the notion that Antarctic electricity generation and the total runs scored in the World Series are independent phenomena and compels us to consider the possible mechanisms underlying this unexpected correlation.

The compelling nature of our results is succinctly encapsulated in Figure 1, which presents a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between electricity generation in Antarctica and total runs scored in the World Series. The graph unequivocally exhibits the pattern of association between the two variables, leaving little room for doubt regarding the existence of this remarkable link.

Our investigation has shed light on a connection so unexpected, it could give even the most seasoned statistician a "shock" of disbelief. The idea that the icy plains of Antarctica could be indirectly influencing the outcome of baseball games is truly a testament to the serendipitous nature of statistical analysis. This isn't just a statistical anomaly, it's a game-changer.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Antarctica and Total runs scored in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Statistics: Exploring the Electrifying Link Between Electricity Generation in Antarctica and Total Runs Scored in the World Series"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Electricity generation in Antarctica and total runs scored in the World Series may seem as unrelated as penguins and baseball, but our study delves into the shocking possible connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we embarked on a quest to illuminate this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7544545 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning 2005 to 2013. This paper presents the electrifying evidence and findings from our pun-intended "chilling" investigation into this unusual association.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the pursuit of understanding the electrically charged connection between electricity generation in Antarctica and the total runs scored in the World Series, researchers have scoured the academic landscape. Smith et al. (2010) examined the effects of environmental conditions on sporting events, albeit with a more earthly focus, and Doe (2015) shed light on the impact of solar energy on athletic performance. However, as our investigation veers into the realm of the hemispheric extreme, we find ourselves in uncharted territory, much like a bemused penguin encountering a baseball for the first time.
Turning to more general energy-related research, Jones et al. (2012) explored the economic implications of renewable energy sources in cold climates, capturing the essence of our Antarctic energy generation angle. Additionally, "The Economics of Ice and Fire" by Winter and Stark (2019) offers an insightful perspective on power dynamics in extreme environments, albeit of a more fictional ilk.
Drawing inspiration from the world of fiction and the playful twists of chance that bind our realities, we turn to "Icecapades: A Game of Cold Conundrums" and "The Baseball Paradox: A Tale of Two Curves" to infuse our exploration with a sense of whimsy and wonder. Who's to say that the icy tundras of Antarctica and the baseball diamonds of America can't share a cosmic connection?
As we tread through this icy maze of unlikely associations, we recall the uncanny intertwining of chance and strategy in board games such as "Power Grid: Antarctica Expansion" and "Baseball Highlights 2045," each containing a hint of the peculiar convergence we aim to tease out in our research.
The hunt for meaning in the midst of statistical obscurity has led us to view this convergence with not mere curiosity, but with a sportive sense of play. After all, if electricity in Antarctica and runs in the World Series can form an unexpected bond, what other fantastical fusions might the empirical world have in store for us? As we forge ahead in our quest for understanding, we must be prepared to embrace the unexpected, juggle a few puns along the way, and keep our sense of whimsy sharp – much like a well-honed ice pick in the hands of a determined yet slightly eccentric explorer.
And so, armed with knowledge ranging from the plausible to the delightfully improbable, we march forth to illuminate the electrifying connection that awaits us in this frosty and formidable mystery.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the curious association between electricity generation in Antarctica and total runs scored in the World Series have yielded some truly electrifying findings. Employing rigorous statistical analyses, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7544545, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between the two variables. This unexpected connection between polar power and America's pastime has raised more than a few eyebrows in the scientific community.
The calculated r-squared value of 0.5692016 further underscores the substantial influence of Antarctic electricity generation on the total runs scored in the World Series. The proportion of variance in total runs scored that can be explained by the variance in electricity generation in Antarctica is indeed notable, prompting us to contemplate the potential implications of such an association.
In line with conventional statistical practices, our findings also revealed a p-value of less than 0.05, emphasizing the statistical significance of the observed relationship. This robust evidence challenges the notion that Antarctic electricity generation and the total runs scored in the World Series are independent phenomena and compels us to consider the possible mechanisms underlying this unexpected correlation.
The compelling nature of our results is succinctly encapsulated in Figure 1, which presents a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between electricity generation in Antarctica and total runs scored in the World Series. The graph unequivocally exhibits the pattern of association between the two variables, leaving little room for doubt regarding the existence of this remarkable link.
Our investigation has shed light on a connection so unexpected, it could give even the most seasoned statistician a "shock" of disbelief. The idea that the icy plains of Antarctica could be indirectly influencing the outcome of baseball games is truly a testament to the serendipitous nature of statistical analysis. This isn't just a statistical anomaly, it's a game-changer.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The correlation between electricity generation in Antarctica and total runs scored in the World Series has indeed sparked a flurry of interest and speculation. Our findings not only confirm, but also augment the existing body of knowledge on this electrifying association, providing a fresh perspective on the interplay between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.

Building on the lighthearted literature review, which playfully acknowledged the whimsical nature of our investigation, it is worth noting how our results have lent credibility to what some may have initially considered a far-fetched connection. The scientific community, much like a perplexed penguin encountering a baseball, has been jolted by the unexpected coherence between these two disparate domains. Our study illuminates that even in the arena of statistical inquiry, there is room for surprise and delight, akin to stumbling upon a hidden Easter egg in a complex statistical model.

The literature review also made sly references to fictional works, subtly hinting at the uncanny parallels between our research and improbable scenarios. While the "Game of Cold Conundrums" and "The Baseball Paradox" were presented as whimsical musings, our results have lent credence to the notion that reality can indeed mirror the delightful incongruities of fiction. The unexpected fusion of Antarctic electricity and baseball runs is not just a statistical anomaly, but a testament to the enigmatic and capricious nature of empirical inquiry.

Furthermore, our exploration of board games such as "Power Grid: Antarctica Expansion" and "Baseball Highlights 2045" alludes to the playful spirit of our investigation. We have navigated through the statistical tundra much like a strategic player maneuvering through an ice-bound game board. Through this metaphorical lens, the emergent correlation becomes akin to a winning strategy, a calculated play that belies the apparent randomness, much like an unpredictably located hidden treasure in the wintry expanse of an exploration-based board game.

The robust r-squared value and statistically significant p-value in our results further reinforce the substantive influence of Antarctic electricity generation on the total runs scored in the World Series. This empirical substantiation not only provides clear evidence of the association but also accentuates the potential for leveraging statistical "power" to unravel hidden connections, much like igniting a beacon amid the obscure tundra of empirical inquiry.

In summary, our investigation into this remarkable association embodies the fusion of scholarly rigor with a spirit of unwavering playfulness. The connection between electricity generation in Antarctica and total runs scored in the World Series may have initially appeared as whimsical as an Antarctic ice maze, but our research has fortified the surprising coherence between these disparate realms, electrifying the landscape of statistical inquiry in the process.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Electricity generation in Antarctica and Total runs scored in the World Series. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Shocking Statistics: Exploring the Electrifying Link Between Electricity Generation in Antarctica and Total Runs Scored in the World Series"

[[ABSTRACT]]
Electricity generation in Antarctica and total runs scored in the World Series may seem as unrelated as penguins and baseball, but our study delves into the shocking possible connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we embarked on a quest to illuminate this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7544545 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning 2005 to 2013. This paper presents the electrifying evidence and findings from our pun-intended "chilling" investigation into this unusual association.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The burgeoning fields of energy economics and sports analytics have brought forth a multitude of unexpected and eccentric correlations that shed light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables. In this regard, our research seeks to uncover the hitherto overlooked connection between the production of electricity in Antarctica and the total runs scored in the World Series. While on the surface the juxtaposition of polar power generation and baseball may seem as incongruous as a snowball fight in the Sahara, our study aims to show that beneath this frosty facade lies a potentially electrifying relationship.
Over the years, researchers have passionately pursued statistical insights in the most unlikely of places, from the relationship between cheese consumption and the number of people who died from becoming tangled in their bedsheets (yes, that is a real study) to the connection between the number of serial killers and the consumption of margarine (no, we're not making this up). In the same spirit, we embarked on our own peculiar quest, navigating through troves of data and statistical analyses to explore this curious pairing of variables.
The overarching goal of our investigation is not only to highlight the statistical association between these two distinct phenomena but to also unravel the underlying mechanisms that may drive such a correlation. While some may view our pursuit as akin to trying to find a polar bear in a blizzard, our findings beckon us to challenge conventional thinking and consider the unexplored interplay between the icy continent's energy output and America's favorite pastime.
As we delve into the intricacies of this hitherto uncharted territory, it is imperative to approach this analysis with an open mind and a willingness to embrace the unexpected. Our endeavor, much like navigating through a maze of statistical significance, paves the way for a compelling exploration into the realms of both energy economics and sports statistics. So, let us embark on this scientific sleuthing expedition, armed with data, statistics, and perhaps a metaphorical pair of snowshoes, as we unravel the mystery behind the improbable correlation between Antarctic electricity generation and the total runs scored in the World Series.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the curious association between electricity generation in Antarctica and total runs scored in the World Series have yielded some truly electrifying findings. Employing rigorous statistical analyses, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7544545, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between the two variables. This unexpected connection between polar power and America's pastime has raised more than a few eyebrows in the scientific community.
The calculated r-squared value of 0.5692016 further underscores the substantial influence of Antarctic electricity generation on the total runs scored in the World Series. The proportion of variance in total runs scored that can be explained by the variance in electricity generation in Antarctica is indeed notable, prompting us to contemplate the potential implications of such an association.
In line with conventional statistical practices, our findings also revealed a p-value of less than 0.05, emphasizing the statistical significance of the observed relationship. This robust evidence challenges the notion that Antarctic electricity generation and the total runs scored in the World Series are independent phenomena and compels us to consider the possible mechanisms underlying this unexpected correlation.
The compelling nature of our results is succinctly encapsulated in Figure 1, which presents a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between electricity generation in Antarctica and total runs scored in the World Series. The graph unequivocally exhibits the pattern of association between the two variables, leaving little room for doubt regarding the existence of this remarkable link.
Our investigation has shed light on a connection so unexpected, it could give even the most seasoned statistician a "shock" of disbelief. The idea that the icy plains of Antarctica could be indirectly influencing the outcome of baseball games is truly a testament to the serendipitous nature of statistical analysis. This isn't just a statistical anomaly, it's a game-changer.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has illuminated a surprisingly "shocking" correlation between Antarctica's electricity generation and the total runs scored in the World Series. The statistical evidence of a moderately strong positive relationship (r = 0.7544545) and a notable explanatory power (r-squared = 0.5692016) has left the scientific community buzzing with a jolt of curiosity and disbelief. Our findings have not only challenged conventional thinking but have also sparked a surge of enthusiasm for uncovering unexpected connections in the vast landscape of statistical analyses.

The scatterplot presented in Figure 1 serves as a visual testament to the electrifying interplay between these seemingly disparate phenomena, proving that there's more to this association than meets the ohm. Even the most seasoned researchers may find themselves "watt"-ching this space with a newfound appreciation for the potential impact of Antarctic energy output on the grand stage of American baseball.

While our investigation may have initially seemed as unlikely as finding a polar bear in Florida, our results underscore the profound importance of approaching statistical inquiries with an open mind and an eagerness to embrace the unexpected. After all, in the realm of statistical analysis, it's the unexpected connections that provide the jolts of inspiration and novelty that keep the field "current."

In light of our findings, it is clear that further exploration into the mechanisms underlying this hair-raising correlation is not only warranted but also eagerly anticipated. Nevertheless, for now, our research has shed an illuminating spotlight on this unforeseen connection, leaving us with a "resistance" to the notion that polar power and the World Series are unrelated phenomena.

In the spirit of scientific discovery, we can confidently assert that no further research is needed in this specific area, but feel free to "conduct" your own investigations elsewhere.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Shocking Statistics: Exploring the Electrifying Link Between Electricity Generation in Antarctica and Total Runs Scored in the World Series. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Polar Power and Baseball Metrics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Shocking Statistics: Exploring the Electrifying Link Between Electricity Generation in Antarctica and Total Runs Scored in the World Series. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Institute for Polar Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Shocking Statistics: Exploring the Electrifying Link Between Electricity Generation in Antarctica and Total Runs Scored in the World Series with an abstract of Electricity generation in Antarctica and total runs scored in the World Series may seem as unrelated as penguins and baseball, but our study delves into the shocking possible connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Wikipedia, we embarked on a quest to illuminate this enigmatic relationship. Our findings revealed a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.7544545 with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.05 for the time period spanning 2005 to 2013. This paper presents the electrifying evidence and findings from our pun-intended "chilling" investigation into this unusual association.

ChatGPT:

electricity generation, Antarctica, total runs scored, World Series, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, Energy Information Administration, Wikipedia, association, relationship, data analysis, unexpected connection

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Electricity generation in Antarctica
Detailed data title: Total electricity generation in Antarctica in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Electricity generation in Antarctica

Total runs scored in the World Series
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Total runs scored in the World Series

Correlation r = 0.7544545 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.5692016 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 56.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total runs scored in the World Series) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Electricity generation in Antarctica) over the 9 years from 2005 through 2013.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.019. 0.0188150568684383600000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.75 in 1.9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 53 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 8 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 8 because we have two variables measured over a period of 9 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.18, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200520062007200820092010201120122013
Electricity generation in Antarctica (Billion kWh)0.0020.0020.0020.0020.0040.0040.0040.00050.0005
Total runs scored in the World Series (Runs scored)343339395941682241




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.004,0.004,0.004,0.0005,0.0005,])
array_2 = np.array([34,33,39,39,59,41,68,22,41,])
array_1_name = "Electricity generation in Antarctica"
array_2_name = "Total runs scored in the World Series"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 1263 · Black Variable ID: 23455 · Red Variable ID: 536
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0