Report an error
Electricity generation in Antarctica correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
The number of septic tank servicers and sewer pipe cleaners in Alabama | r=0.91 | 12yrs | Yes! |
The number of bridge and lock tenders in Massachusetts | r=0.88 | 12yrs | Yes! |
The number of school teachers in Alaska | r=0.87 | 7yrs | No |
Total runs scored in the World Series | r=0.75 | 9yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'why do i have green poop' | r=0.75 | 12yrs | No |
Wins for the New York Yankees | r=0.75 | 12yrs | No |
Runs Scored by Winning Team in World Series | r=0.74 | 9yrs | Yes! |
Total seasons Darren Fletcher played for Manchester United | r=0.71 | 12yrs | Yes! |
Runs Scored by the losing team in the World Series | r=0.7 | 9yrs | Yes! |
Electricity generation in Antarctica also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)