about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,262 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic matches and the second variable is Google searches for 'skydiving accident'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Vincent Kompany's cumulative goals in domestic matches decreased, opposing teams were so relieved that they decided to take up skydiving instead of playing, leading to fewer skydiving accidents. Remember, safety first, whether you're on the pitch or in the sky!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image that combines a futuristic soccer field with a disappointed team captain and grounded skydivers. In the image, Vincent Kompany, the team's captain, stands in the center of a vibrant, high-tech soccer field. He is captured in a moment of reflection, with a subtle expression of disappointment. Behind him, a futuristic scoreboard displays his declining number of goals in domestic matches. In the sky above, there are fewer parachutes descending, while a group of skydivers remains grounded, looking on with visible disappointment. A prominent figure, resembling an expert, points at Kompany, emphasizing his lack of scoring as the reason for the decrease in skydiving accidents. The entire scene exudes a sense of futuristic melancholy and disappointment, juxtaposing the world of sports with the impact on aerial activities. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: The Decrease in Cumulative Goals Scored by Vincent Kompany in Domestic Matches Leads to Decrease in Skydiving Accidents: Expert Claims Kompany's Lack of Scoring Caused Skydivers to Stay Grounded. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Art nouveau Brutalism Futuristic Scalar art Art nouveau
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. The Decrease in Cumulative Goals Scored by Vincent Kompany in Domestic Matches Leads to Decrease in Skydiving Accidents: Expert Claims Kompany's Lack of Scoring Caused Skydivers to Stay Grounded
ChatGPT: You see a soccer field with Vincent Kompany, the team's captain, scoring fewer goals in domestic matches. In the sky, there are fewer parachutes descending, and the skydivers are seen standing on the ground, looking disappointed. An expert is pointing at Kompany's lack of scoring as the reason for the decrease in skydiving accidents, claiming that the disappointment of the fans kept skydivers from taking to the skies.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: You see a soccer field with Vincent Kompany, the team's captain, scoring fewer goals in domestic matches. In the sky, there are fewer parachutes descending, and the skydivers are seen standing on the ground, looking disappointed. An expert is pointing at Kompany's lack of scoring as the reason for the decrease in skydiving accidents, claiming that the disappointment of the fans kept skydivers from taking to the skies. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image that combines a futuristic soccer field with a disappointed team captain and grounded skydivers. In the image, Vincent Kompany, the team's captain, stands in the center of a vibrant, high-tech soccer field. He is captured in a moment of reflection, with a subtle expression of disappointment. Behind him, a futuristic scoreboard displays his declining number of goals in domestic matches. In the sky above, there are fewer parachutes descending, while a group of skydivers remains grounded, looking on with visible disappointment. A prominent figure, resembling an expert, points at Kompany, emphasizing his lack of scoring as the reason for the decrease in skydiving accidents. The entire scene exudes a sense of futuristic melancholy and disappointment, juxtaposing the world of sports with the impact on aerial activities.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic matches caused skydiving accident (Google searches for 'skydiving accident') to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident'

Journal of Sports Psychology and Internet Behavior

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic matches and Google searches for 'skydiving accident'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.5054666 and p < 0.05 for 2004 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
"Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident'"

The relationship between the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic football matches and the frequency of Google searches for 'skydiving accident' has been a topic of lively debate and speculation. This study sought to investigate this peculiar association, combining the realms of sports and internet search behavior in a quest for understanding. It appears that when Kompany scores, people may be more likely to think about plummeting from the sky – figuratively or literally!

Using data sourced from Wikipedia and Google Trends, our research team undertook a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2020. The results revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.5054666 and a p-value of less than 0.05, indicating a moderate positive correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. It seems that, as Kompany finds the back of the net, more people take a dive into the world of skydiving mishaps.

This unexpected correlation prompts the question: could there be an underlying psychological mechanism at play, or is it simply a curious quirk of human behavior? There’s certainly a lot to unpack here – and it’s not just parachute cords!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic matches and Google searches for 'skydiving accident'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
"Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident'"

The relationship between the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic football matches and the frequency of Google searches for 'skydiving accident' has been a topic of lively debate and speculation. This study sought to investigate this peculiar association, combining the realms of sports and internet search behavior in a quest for understanding. It appears that when Kompany scores, people may be more likely to think about plummeting from the sky – figuratively or literally!

Using data sourced from Wikipedia and Google Trends, our research team undertook a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2020. The results revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.5054666 and a p-value of less than 0.05, indicating a moderate positive correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. It seems that, as Kompany finds the back of the net, more people take a dive into the world of skydiving mishaps.

This unexpected correlation prompts the question: could there be an underlying psychological mechanism at play, or is it simply a curious quirk of human behavior? There’s certainly a lot to unpack here – and it’s not just parachute cords!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between individuals' search behavior and external events has been a subject of interest across various fields, from economics to health research. In the world of sports, the influence of a player's performance on internet search activity has become a topic of intrigue. In the case of Vincent Kompany, the former Manchester City footballer, the link between his cumulative goals in domestic matches and searches for 'skydiving accident' on Google has raised eyebrows – and perhaps even led to a few raised heart rates for those with a fear of heights.

Some might wonder if there’s a "free fall" when it comes to internet search interests, especially when mixed with the thrill of a goal on the football field. Not to "parachute" around the issue, but this association between Kompany's feats on the pitch and the alarming queries about skydiving accidents has left many scratching their heads – and wondering if they should check their parachute for the next game.

It is in this light that this study seeks to delve into the statistical relationship between Vincent Kompany's goal-scoring prowess and the public's sudden preoccupation with skydiving mishaps. This unexpected connection raises the fascinating possibility that individuals’ online behaviors may be influenced by events seemingly unrelated to their search queries. A correlation between the ascent of a football and the descent of a search term could open up a new area of investigation – and perhaps lead us to "flying" conclusions.

Stay tuned as we navigate through the data to unveil the potential reasons behind this curious correlation. The goal of this study is not just to score points in the realm of statistical analysis, but also to shed light on the mysterious ways in which human curiosity and internet surfing can intersect – or take a plunge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic matches and Google searches for 'skydiving accident'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
"Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident'"

The relationship between the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic football matches and the frequency of Google searches for 'skydiving accident' has been a topic of lively debate and speculation. This study sought to investigate this peculiar association, combining the realms of sports and internet search behavior in a quest for understanding. It appears that when Kompany scores, people may be more likely to think about plummeting from the sky – figuratively or literally!

Using data sourced from Wikipedia and Google Trends, our research team undertook a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2020. The results revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.5054666 and a p-value of less than 0.05, indicating a moderate positive correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. It seems that, as Kompany finds the back of the net, more people take a dive into the world of skydiving mishaps.

This unexpected correlation prompts the question: could there be an underlying psychological mechanism at play, or is it simply a curious quirk of human behavior? There’s certainly a lot to unpack here – and it’s not just parachute cords!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between individuals' search behavior and external events has been a subject of interest across various fields, from economics to health research. In the world of sports, the influence of a player's performance on internet search activity has become a topic of intrigue. In the case of Vincent Kompany, the former Manchester City footballer, the link between his cumulative goals in domestic matches and searches for 'skydiving accident' on Google has raised eyebrows – and perhaps even led to a few raised heart rates for those with a fear of heights.
Some might wonder if there’s a "free fall" when it comes to internet search interests, especially when mixed with the thrill of a goal on the football field. Not to "parachute" around the issue, but this association between Kompany's feats on the pitch and the alarming queries about skydiving accidents has left many scratching their heads – and wondering if they should check their parachute for the next game.
It is in this light that this study seeks to delve into the statistical relationship between Vincent Kompany's goal-scoring prowess and the public's sudden preoccupation with skydiving mishaps. This unexpected connection raises the fascinating possibility that individuals’ online behaviors may be influenced by events seemingly unrelated to their search queries. A correlation between the ascent of a football and the descent of a search term could open up a new area of investigation – and perhaps lead us to "flying" conclusions.
Stay tuned as we navigate through the data to unveil the potential reasons behind this curious correlation. The goal of this study is not just to score points in the realm of statistical analysis, but also to shed light on the mysterious ways in which human curiosity and internet surfing can intersect – or take a plunge.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors find that in "Smith et al. (2015)," the correlation between the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic football matches and Google searches for 'skydiving accident' is the subject of recent investigation. The study posits a potential link between the two seemingly disparate phenomena, invoking a sense of curiosity and a desire to delve deeper into the underlying psychological mechanisms at play. However, the authors stop short of making any definitive conclusions, leaving the door open for further exploration.

Dad Joke #1: Why don't skydivers ever listen to music?
Because they're afraid of dropping a beat!

Subsequently, in "Doe and Jones (2017)," a comprehensive analysis of internet search behavior in relation to sporting events sheds light on the surprising connection between Kompany's goal-scoring prowess and the sudden surge in queries about skydiving accidents. This study offers valuable insights into the potential impact of a footballer's achievements on the public's online activities, provoking contemplation on the intricate interplay between sports performance and internet search trends.

As we venture further into the realm of potential influences on search behavior, it is essential to consider the broader context of human psychology and the impact of external stimuli. This prompts contemplation, not only on the statistically significant correlation coefficients but also on the intriguing possibility of uncovering a hitherto unexplored aspect of human cognition – one that is, quite literally, sky-high.

Moving beyond the confines of academic literature, non-fiction works such as "Extreme Sports and Psychology" by John Smith and "The Science of Search: Understanding Online Behavior" by Jane Doe offer valuable perspectives on the intricate interplay between sporting achievements and internet search patterns. These insightful publications contribute to a deeper understanding of the potential psychological underpinnings of the observed correlation, paving the way for further exploration and analysis.

Dad Joke #2: Why did the skydiver bring a pencil to the jump?
In case they needed to draw their own conclusions!

In addition to rigorous academic research and scholarly discourse, fiction works such as "The Skydiver's Dilemma" by Adam Jones and "Goal Rush: A Footballer's Adventures" by Emily Doe offer a more imaginative exploration of the potential intertwining of sports and adrenaline-inducing activities. While these works are not grounded in empirical evidence, they serve to ignite the imagination and inspire curiosity about the unexpected connections that may exist in the world of sports and internet search behavior.

Furthermore, it is worth noting the influence of popular culture phenomena, such as the "Surprised Pikachu" meme, which encapsulates the unexpected nature of correlations in a lighthearted and relatable manner. This meme serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely associations can capture public attention and spark intrigue, mirroring the puzzled expressions of those pondering the connection between Kompany's goals and searches for skydiving mishaps.

Dad Joke #3: Why are skydivers so bad at cards?
They always fold before they jump!

In conclusion, the literature review illuminates a diverse array of perspectives on the correlation between Vincent Kompany's goals and Google searches for 'skydiving accident,' ranging from scholarly investigations to imaginative works and popular internet culture. This multifaceted approach sets the stage for a comprehensive exploration of the topic, inviting researchers to consider not only statistical analyses but also the humor, creativity, and unexpected twists that characterize this peculiar correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic matches and Google searches for 'skydiving accident'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
"Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident'"

The relationship between the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic football matches and the frequency of Google searches for 'skydiving accident' has been a topic of lively debate and speculation. This study sought to investigate this peculiar association, combining the realms of sports and internet search behavior in a quest for understanding. It appears that when Kompany scores, people may be more likely to think about plummeting from the sky – figuratively or literally!

Using data sourced from Wikipedia and Google Trends, our research team undertook a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2020. The results revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.5054666 and a p-value of less than 0.05, indicating a moderate positive correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. It seems that, as Kompany finds the back of the net, more people take a dive into the world of skydiving mishaps.

This unexpected correlation prompts the question: could there be an underlying psychological mechanism at play, or is it simply a curious quirk of human behavior? There’s certainly a lot to unpack here – and it’s not just parachute cords!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between individuals' search behavior and external events has been a subject of interest across various fields, from economics to health research. In the world of sports, the influence of a player's performance on internet search activity has become a topic of intrigue. In the case of Vincent Kompany, the former Manchester City footballer, the link between his cumulative goals in domestic matches and searches for 'skydiving accident' on Google has raised eyebrows – and perhaps even led to a few raised heart rates for those with a fear of heights.
Some might wonder if there’s a "free fall" when it comes to internet search interests, especially when mixed with the thrill of a goal on the football field. Not to "parachute" around the issue, but this association between Kompany's feats on the pitch and the alarming queries about skydiving accidents has left many scratching their heads – and wondering if they should check their parachute for the next game.
It is in this light that this study seeks to delve into the statistical relationship between Vincent Kompany's goal-scoring prowess and the public's sudden preoccupation with skydiving mishaps. This unexpected connection raises the fascinating possibility that individuals’ online behaviors may be influenced by events seemingly unrelated to their search queries. A correlation between the ascent of a football and the descent of a search term could open up a new area of investigation – and perhaps lead us to "flying" conclusions.
Stay tuned as we navigate through the data to unveil the potential reasons behind this curious correlation. The goal of this study is not just to score points in the realm of statistical analysis, but also to shed light on the mysterious ways in which human curiosity and internet surfing can intersect – or take a plunge.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Our research team employed a mixed-methods approach to analyze the correlation between Vincent Kompany's cumulative goals in domestic football matches and the frequency of Google searches for 'skydiving accident'. This methodology combined quantitative analysis of statistical data with a qualitative exploration of potential psychological and behavioral underpinnings, as we sought to unearth the causal mechanisms behind this intriguing association.

To commence the analysis, we collected comprehensive data on Vincent Kompany's goals in domestic matches from reliable sources, including but not limited to football databases, official match reports, and the lofty peaks of Wikipedia. The compilation of this information was no mean feat, akin to a precise, well-timed header into the net amidst a clutter of defenders.

Simultaneously, we extracted temporal Google search trends for the phrase 'skydiving accident' using the Google Trends platform, spanning the period from 2004 to 2020. The search frequency data was then meticulously scrutinized for any peaks and valleys, akin to the ebb and flow of a skydiver's trajectory, and cross-referenced with the timeline of Vincent Kompany's goal-scoring exploits.

Utilizing robust statistical techniques, including correlation analysis and regression models, we quantified the relationship between the accumulation of Vincent Kompany's goals and fluctuations in Google searches for 'skydiving accident'. Our calculations were carried out with the precision of a well-placed penalty kick, ensuring that no statistical infraction disrupted the integrity of our findings.

Furthermore, recognizing the potential for confounding variables, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to assess the stability of the observed correlation under varying conditions. This exercise aimed to differentiate between a true association and mere statistical happenstance, akin to distinguishing a genuine freefall from a simulated skydiving experience.

In tandem with our quantitative examination, we delved into the realm of qualitative inquiry to explore the potential psychological and behavioral mechanisms underlying the unexpected correlation. This qualitative exploration involved in-depth interviews with a select group of football enthusiasts, parachute aficionados, and individuals with a keen interest in internet search behavior. These discussions provided valuable insights into the subjective experiences and perceptions that may underpin the statistical association uncovered in our analysis.

As we endeavored to untangle the enigmatic web of correlations and explore the depths of human curiosity, our methodology combined the rigor of statistical inquiry with the nuanced understanding of human behavior. By bridging the gap between the football pitch and the digital world, we aimed to shed light on this curious connection and illuminate the path for future investigations. After all, when it comes to uncovering the mysteries of human behavior, sometimes it takes a "leap of faith" to truly understand the unexpected correlations that "skydive" into our research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic matches and Google searches for 'skydiving accident'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.5054666, r-squared of 0.2554964, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
"Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident'"

The relationship between the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic football matches and the frequency of Google searches for 'skydiving accident' has been a topic of lively debate and speculation. This study sought to investigate this peculiar association, combining the realms of sports and internet search behavior in a quest for understanding. It appears that when Kompany scores, people may be more likely to think about plummeting from the sky – figuratively or literally!

Using data sourced from Wikipedia and Google Trends, our research team undertook a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2020. The results revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.5054666 and a p-value of less than 0.05, indicating a moderate positive correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. It seems that, as Kompany finds the back of the net, more people take a dive into the world of skydiving mishaps.

This unexpected correlation prompts the question: could there be an underlying psychological mechanism at play, or is it simply a curious quirk of human behavior? There’s certainly a lot to unpack here – and it’s not just parachute cords!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between individuals' search behavior and external events has been a subject of interest across various fields, from economics to health research. In the world of sports, the influence of a player's performance on internet search activity has become a topic of intrigue. In the case of Vincent Kompany, the former Manchester City footballer, the link between his cumulative goals in domestic matches and searches for 'skydiving accident' on Google has raised eyebrows – and perhaps even led to a few raised heart rates for those with a fear of heights.
Some might wonder if there’s a "free fall" when it comes to internet search interests, especially when mixed with the thrill of a goal on the football field. Not to "parachute" around the issue, but this association between Kompany's feats on the pitch and the alarming queries about skydiving accidents has left many scratching their heads – and wondering if they should check their parachute for the next game.
It is in this light that this study seeks to delve into the statistical relationship between Vincent Kompany's goal-scoring prowess and the public's sudden preoccupation with skydiving mishaps. This unexpected connection raises the fascinating possibility that individuals’ online behaviors may be influenced by events seemingly unrelated to their search queries. A correlation between the ascent of a football and the descent of a search term could open up a new area of investigation – and perhaps lead us to "flying" conclusions.
Stay tuned as we navigate through the data to unveil the potential reasons behind this curious correlation. The goal of this study is not just to score points in the realm of statistical analysis, but also to shed light on the mysterious ways in which human curiosity and internet surfing can intersect – or take a plunge.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.5054666 between the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic football matches and the frequency of Google searches for 'skydiving accident'. This moderate positive correlation suggests that as Kompany's goal-scoring prowess increased, so did the public's interest in skydiving mishaps. It seems that the thrill of a goal on the pitch may lead to a surge in virtual free falls.

The observed correlation is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.2554964, indicating that approximately 25.55% of the variability in Google searches for 'skydiving accident' can be explained by the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany. While this association may seem like a sky-high leap in logic, the statistical evidence backs up this unexpected link.

The p-value of less than 0.05 adds weight to these findings, providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no correlation between Kompany's goal-scoring performance and the occurrence of skydiving accident searches. This result is more "airtight" than a parachute canopy!

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation between the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany and the frequency of Google searches for 'skydiving accident'. The data points cluster around a clear upward trend, reinforcing the notion that as goals ascend, so do searches related to aerial descents. This relationship may lead one to ponder: do Kompany's goals serve as a catalyst for metaphorical plunges or simply pique the public's interest in airborne escapades?

It appears that this study, while rooted in the seemingly distant realms of football and skydiving mishaps, has uncovered a notable statistical relationship. The unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the psychological and behavioral underpinnings of this association. As the data takes a nosedive into the depths of statistical analysis, it becomes increasingly clear that the intersection of sports performance and internet search behavior may hold more surprises than meets the eye. This peculiar relationship seems to hint at the unexplored intricacies of human curiosity and its digital manifestations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic matches and Google searches for 'skydiving accident'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
"Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident'"

The relationship between the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic football matches and the frequency of Google searches for 'skydiving accident' has been a topic of lively debate and speculation. This study sought to investigate this peculiar association, combining the realms of sports and internet search behavior in a quest for understanding. It appears that when Kompany scores, people may be more likely to think about plummeting from the sky – figuratively or literally!

Using data sourced from Wikipedia and Google Trends, our research team undertook a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2020. The results revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.5054666 and a p-value of less than 0.05, indicating a moderate positive correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. It seems that, as Kompany finds the back of the net, more people take a dive into the world of skydiving mishaps.

This unexpected correlation prompts the question: could there be an underlying psychological mechanism at play, or is it simply a curious quirk of human behavior? There’s certainly a lot to unpack here – and it’s not just parachute cords!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors find that in "Smith et al. (2015)," the correlation between the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic football matches and Google searches for 'skydiving accident' is the subject of recent investigation. The study posits a potential link between the two seemingly disparate phenomena, invoking a sense of curiosity and a desire to delve deeper into the underlying psychological mechanisms at play. However, the authors stop short of making any definitive conclusions, leaving the door open for further exploration.
Dad Joke #1: Why don't skydivers ever listen to music?
Because they're afraid of dropping a beat!
Subsequently, in "Doe and Jones (2017)," a comprehensive analysis of internet search behavior in relation to sporting events sheds light on the surprising connection between Kompany's goal-scoring prowess and the sudden surge in queries about skydiving accidents. This study offers valuable insights into the potential impact of a footballer's achievements on the public's online activities, provoking contemplation on the intricate interplay between sports performance and internet search trends.
As we venture further into the realm of potential influences on search behavior, it is essential to consider the broader context of human psychology and the impact of external stimuli. This prompts contemplation, not only on the statistically significant correlation coefficients but also on the intriguing possibility of uncovering a hitherto unexplored aspect of human cognition – one that is, quite literally, sky-high.
Moving beyond the confines of academic literature, non-fiction works such as "Extreme Sports and Psychology" by John Smith and "The Science of Search: Understanding Online Behavior" by Jane Doe offer valuable perspectives on the intricate interplay between sporting achievements and internet search patterns. These insightful publications contribute to a deeper understanding of the potential psychological underpinnings of the observed correlation, paving the way for further exploration and analysis.
Dad Joke #2: Why did the skydiver bring a pencil to the jump?
In case they needed to draw their own conclusions!
In addition to rigorous academic research and scholarly discourse, fiction works such as "The Skydiver's Dilemma" by Adam Jones and "Goal Rush: A Footballer's Adventures" by Emily Doe offer a more imaginative exploration of the potential intertwining of sports and adrenaline-inducing activities. While these works are not grounded in empirical evidence, they serve to ignite the imagination and inspire curiosity about the unexpected connections that may exist in the world of sports and internet search behavior.
Furthermore, it is worth noting the influence of popular culture phenomena, such as the "Surprised Pikachu" meme, which encapsulates the unexpected nature of correlations in a lighthearted and relatable manner. This meme serves as a reminder that even the most unlikely associations can capture public attention and spark intrigue, mirroring the puzzled expressions of those pondering the connection between Kompany's goals and searches for skydiving mishaps.
Dad Joke #3: Why are skydivers so bad at cards?
They always fold before they jump!
In conclusion, the literature review illuminates a diverse array of perspectives on the correlation between Vincent Kompany's goals and Google searches for 'skydiving accident,' ranging from scholarly investigations to imaginative works and popular internet culture. This multifaceted approach sets the stage for a comprehensive exploration of the topic, inviting researchers to consider not only statistical analyses but also the humor, creativity, and unexpected twists that characterize this peculiar correlation.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.5054666 between the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic football matches and the frequency of Google searches for 'skydiving accident'. This moderate positive correlation suggests that as Kompany's goal-scoring prowess increased, so did the public's interest in skydiving mishaps. It seems that the thrill of a goal on the pitch may lead to a surge in virtual free falls.
The observed correlation is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.2554964, indicating that approximately 25.55% of the variability in Google searches for 'skydiving accident' can be explained by the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany. While this association may seem like a sky-high leap in logic, the statistical evidence backs up this unexpected link.
The p-value of less than 0.05 adds weight to these findings, providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no correlation between Kompany's goal-scoring performance and the occurrence of skydiving accident searches. This result is more "airtight" than a parachute canopy!
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation between the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany and the frequency of Google searches for 'skydiving accident'. The data points cluster around a clear upward trend, reinforcing the notion that as goals ascend, so do searches related to aerial descents. This relationship may lead one to ponder: do Kompany's goals serve as a catalyst for metaphorical plunges or simply pique the public's interest in airborne escapades?
It appears that this study, while rooted in the seemingly distant realms of football and skydiving mishaps, has uncovered a notable statistical relationship. The unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the psychological and behavioral underpinnings of this association. As the data takes a nosedive into the depths of statistical analysis, it becomes increasingly clear that the intersection of sports performance and internet search behavior may hold more surprises than meets the eye. This peculiar relationship seems to hint at the unexplored intricacies of human curiosity and its digital manifestations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study support the previous research that has hinted at a potential link between the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic football matches and the frequency of Google searches for 'skydiving accident'. The statistically significant correlation coefficient and the p-value of less than 0.05 in the current study align with the preliminary investigations, suggesting that there may indeed be a moderate positive correlation between Kompany's scoring achievements and the public's interest in skydiving mishaps.

The observed association may seem to defy gravity, but it mirrors the unpredictability of skydiving mishaps themselves. The results lend credence to the notion that as Kompany's goal-scoring prowess rises, so does the virtual free fall of online searches for skydiving accidents. It appears that there is more than meets the eye in the interplay between a footballer's performance on the pitch and the public's online behavior – perhaps there's a case of "free-fall" transfer from the sporting realm to the digital domain!

The r-squared value of approximately 25.55% further supports the premise that there is a tangible relationship between Kompany's goals and the frequency of searches for skydiving accidents. This suggests that a quarter of the variability in Google searches for skydiving accidents can be explained by Kompany's scoring exploits – a significant proportion that should not be taken with a pinch of salt, or with a jump off a plane for that matter!

The visual representation of the strong positive correlation in the scatterplot illustrates the upward trend of online searches as Kompany's goals ascend. This not only supports the quantitative findings but also serves as a vivid portrayal of the unexpected interconnectedness between the world of football and the fascination with the perils of skydiving. It's as if the data itself is taking a daring leap into uncharted territory!

The statistical evidence presented in this study, while seemingly lighthearted in its juxtaposition of football and skydiving mishaps, indicates a notable relationship. As the academic community delves into the unexplored intricacies of human curiosity and its digital manifestations, it seems that the unexpected connection between sports performance and internet search behavior may hold more surprises than previously thought. It wouldn't be a stretch to say that this correlation is nothing short of a "sky-high" revelation in the realm of unconventional associations.

The unexpected yet statistically sound connection between Vincent Kompany's goals and Google searches for 'skydiving accident' raises intriguing questions about the potential psychological and behavioral underpinnings of this phenomenon. Is this correlation merely a statistical oddity, or does it reflect a deeper aspect of human cognition and curiosity? There's certainly plenty of "airtime" for further investigation into this captivating confluence of disparate realms.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic matches and Google searches for 'skydiving accident'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
"Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident'"

The relationship between the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic football matches and the frequency of Google searches for 'skydiving accident' has been a topic of lively debate and speculation. This study sought to investigate this peculiar association, combining the realms of sports and internet search behavior in a quest for understanding. It appears that when Kompany scores, people may be more likely to think about plummeting from the sky – figuratively or literally!

Using data sourced from Wikipedia and Google Trends, our research team undertook a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2020. The results revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.5054666 and a p-value of less than 0.05, indicating a moderate positive correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. It seems that, as Kompany finds the back of the net, more people take a dive into the world of skydiving mishaps.

This unexpected correlation prompts the question: could there be an underlying psychological mechanism at play, or is it simply a curious quirk of human behavior? There’s certainly a lot to unpack here – and it’s not just parachute cords!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between individuals' search behavior and external events has been a subject of interest across various fields, from economics to health research. In the world of sports, the influence of a player's performance on internet search activity has become a topic of intrigue. In the case of Vincent Kompany, the former Manchester City footballer, the link between his cumulative goals in domestic matches and searches for 'skydiving accident' on Google has raised eyebrows – and perhaps even led to a few raised heart rates for those with a fear of heights.
Some might wonder if there’s a "free fall" when it comes to internet search interests, especially when mixed with the thrill of a goal on the football field. Not to "parachute" around the issue, but this association between Kompany's feats on the pitch and the alarming queries about skydiving accidents has left many scratching their heads – and wondering if they should check their parachute for the next game.
It is in this light that this study seeks to delve into the statistical relationship between Vincent Kompany's goal-scoring prowess and the public's sudden preoccupation with skydiving mishaps. This unexpected connection raises the fascinating possibility that individuals’ online behaviors may be influenced by events seemingly unrelated to their search queries. A correlation between the ascent of a football and the descent of a search term could open up a new area of investigation – and perhaps lead us to "flying" conclusions.
Stay tuned as we navigate through the data to unveil the potential reasons behind this curious correlation. The goal of this study is not just to score points in the realm of statistical analysis, but also to shed light on the mysterious ways in which human curiosity and internet surfing can intersect – or take a plunge.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.5054666 between the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic football matches and the frequency of Google searches for 'skydiving accident'. This moderate positive correlation suggests that as Kompany's goal-scoring prowess increased, so did the public's interest in skydiving mishaps. It seems that the thrill of a goal on the pitch may lead to a surge in virtual free falls.
The observed correlation is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.2554964, indicating that approximately 25.55% of the variability in Google searches for 'skydiving accident' can be explained by the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany. While this association may seem like a sky-high leap in logic, the statistical evidence backs up this unexpected link.
The p-value of less than 0.05 adds weight to these findings, providing strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no correlation between Kompany's goal-scoring performance and the occurrence of skydiving accident searches. This result is more "airtight" than a parachute canopy!
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation between the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany and the frequency of Google searches for 'skydiving accident'. The data points cluster around a clear upward trend, reinforcing the notion that as goals ascend, so do searches related to aerial descents. This relationship may lead one to ponder: do Kompany's goals serve as a catalyst for metaphorical plunges or simply pique the public's interest in airborne escapades?
It appears that this study, while rooted in the seemingly distant realms of football and skydiving mishaps, has uncovered a notable statistical relationship. The unexpected correlation prompts further investigation into the psychological and behavioral underpinnings of this association. As the data takes a nosedive into the depths of statistical analysis, it becomes increasingly clear that the intersection of sports performance and internet search behavior may hold more surprises than meets the eye. This peculiar relationship seems to hint at the unexplored intricacies of human curiosity and its digital manifestations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study provide robust evidence of a significant positive correlation between the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic football matches and the frequency of Google searches for 'skydiving accident'. It appears that as Kompany's ability to find the back of the net soared, so did the public's curiosity about abrupt descents. One might say that he has truly made a "plunge" into the world of statistical correlations.

The results of this research shed light on the intriguing ways in which seemingly unrelated events can influence public search behavior. It seems that Kompany's success on the football pitch may trigger an interest in the less fortunate experiences of skydivers. One could say the correlation is as clear as the sky on a sunny day – or as murky as a parachute deployment on a stormy one.

Given the unexpected nature of this correlation, further exploration of the underlying mechanisms driving this phenomenon is warranted. Perhaps there are psychological, emotional, or even subconscious factors at play here. It seems we may need to dig deeper for answers, much like a skydiver searching for a soft landing.

However, it is important to note that correlation does not imply causation, and it is essential to approach this relationship with caution. As we navigate the enigmatic realm of human behavior and internet search patterns, we must be mindful of the potential for confounding variables and spurious associations. After all, just because one scores a goal, it doesn't mean one should jump to conclusions – but perhaps one could consider a skydiving metaphor or two.

Therefore, while this study has provided fascinating insights into the unusual connection between Kompany's goals and skydiving accident searches, it also underscores the need for careful interpretation and further investigation. However, one thing is clear: no more research is needed in this area; we have reached the "zenith" of understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Sports Psychology and Internet Behavior


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Interdisciplinary Research on Athletic Achievement and Extreme Leisure Activities


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident' with an abstract of Scoring High and Diving Low: The Correlation Between Vincent Kompany's Goals and Searches for 'Skydiving Accident'"
The relationship between the cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic football matches and the frequency of Google searches for 'skydiving accident' has been a topic of lively debate and speculation. This study sought to investigate this peculiar association, combining the realms of sports and internet search behavior in a quest for understanding. It appears that when Kompany scores, people may be more likely to think about plummeting from the sky – figuratively or literally!
Using data sourced from Wikipedia and Google Trends, our research team undertook a comprehensive analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2020. The results revealed a statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.5054666 and a p-value of less than 0.05, indicating a moderate positive correlation between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. It seems that, as Kompany finds the back of the net, more people take a dive into the world of skydiving mishaps.
This unexpected correlation prompts the question: could there be an underlying psychological mechanism at play, or is it simply a curious quirk of human behavior? There’s certainly a lot to unpack here – and it’s not just parachute cords!

ChatGPT:

Vincent Kompany, goals, Google searches, skydiving accident, correlation, sports, internet search behavior, Wikipedia, Google Trends, analysis, psychological mechanism, human behavior.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic matches
Detailed data title: Cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic matches for Anderlecht, Hamburg SV, and Manchester City
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic matches

Google searches for 'skydiving accident'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'skydiving accident' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'skydiving accident'

Correlation r = 0.5054666 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.2554964 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 25.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'skydiving accident') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic matches) over the 17 years from 2004 through 2020.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.038. 0.0384682885739807200000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.51 in 3.8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 26 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.03, 0.79 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic matches (Goals scored)22203120314023111
Google searches for 'skydiving accident' (Rel. search volume)17.7524.583316.916713.416721.416715.514.916719.916723.833325.166728.2518.333316.083317.166713.2516.166710.5




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2,2,2,0,3,1,2,0,3,1,4,0,2,3,1,1,1,])
array_2 = np.array([17.75,24.5833,16.9167,13.4167,21.4167,15.5,14.9167,19.9167,23.8333,25.1667,28.25,18.3333,16.0833,17.1667,13.25,16.1667,10.5,])
array_1_name = "Cumulative goals scored by Vincent Kompany in domestic matches"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'skydiving accident'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 1262 · Black Variable ID: 306 · Red Variable ID: 1409
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0