about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,256 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and the second variable is Hollister retail store count worldwide.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the corn grew taller thanks to those genetically modified traits, it inadvertently stalked and pulled in more customers for Hollister, leading to a global expansion. It seems the secret to growing a successful clothing chain is just a-MAIZE-ing!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that showcases a picturesque rural cornfield in Iowa illuminated by the warm glow of the sun. The sky is a vivid shade of blue and the genetically modified cornstalks stand tall and dense, swaying gently in the breeze. A group of fashionably dressed teenagers explore the field, dressed in trendy, distressed denim jeans and jackets featuring Hollister logos. In the distance, a new Hollister storefront is being set up, signifying the commercial impact of the teenagers' interest in the fashion brand. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: "Genetically Modified Corn in Iowa Leads to Global Expansion of Hollister Stores as Teens Develop Unexplainable Obsession with Distressed Denim". Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie A scene from Skyrim A photo-realistic image a Polaroid photo Cyber folk
ChatGPT: a scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. "Genetically Modified Corn in Iowa Leads to Global Expansion of Hollister Stores as Teens Develop Unexplainable Obsession with Distressed Denim"
ChatGPT: In a sunny, rural cornfield in Iowa, tall stalks of genetically modified corn sway gently in the breeze. The vibrant green leaves rustle as they reach for the blue sky above. In the distance, a group of teenagers gathers on the edge of the field, examining the crops with intense curiosity. Their clothing catches the eye - they all wear trendy, distressed denim jeans and jackets, adorned with Hollister logos. As they chatter excitedly, a pair of Hollister store employees set up a new storefront nearby, preparing to cater to the sudden surge in demand for the popular brand's products.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In a sunny, rural cornfield in Iowa, tall stalks of genetically modified corn sway gently in the breeze. The vibrant green leaves rustle as they reach for the blue sky above. In the distance, a group of teenagers gathers on the edge of the field, examining the crops with intense curiosity. Their clothing catches the eye - they all wear trendy, distressed denim jeans and jackets, adorned with Hollister logos. As they chatter excitedly, a pair of Hollister store employees set up a new storefront nearby, preparing to cater to the sudden surge in demand for the popular brand's products. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that showcases a picturesque rural cornfield in Iowa illuminated by the warm glow of the sun. The sky is a vivid shade of blue and the genetically modified cornstalks stand tall and dense, swaying gently in the breeze. A group of fashionably dressed teenagers explore the field, dressed in trendy, distressed denim jeans and jackets featuring Hollister logos. In the distance, a new Hollister storefront is being set up, signifying the commercial impact of the teenagers' interest in the fashion brand.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Iowa caused Hollister retail store count worldwide to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Maize to Model-Worthy Apparel: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Store Count

The Journal of Agricultural Fashionology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9865479 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Maize to Model-Worthy Apparel: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Store Count"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unexpected link between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores. Tackling this quirky conundrum with verve, our study utilized USDA and Statista data to analyze the correlation between GMO corn production in Iowa and the spiky growth of cool, beach-themed fashion outlets worldwide. We calculated a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9865479 and p < 0.01, indicating a striking relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. While initially confounding, our findings shed light on the potential influence of agricultural innovation on the retail landscape, all while sprinkling in a few kernel of puns for good measure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maize to Model-Worthy Apparel: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Store Count"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unexpected link between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores. Tackling this quirky conundrum with verve, our study utilized USDA and Statista data to analyze the correlation between GMO corn production in Iowa and the spiky growth of cool, beach-themed fashion outlets worldwide. We calculated a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9865479 and p < 0.01, indicating a striking relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. While initially confounding, our findings shed light on the potential influence of agricultural innovation on the retail landscape, all while sprinkling in a few kernel of puns for good measure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Corn, a staple of the American heartland and a symbol of agricultural prowess, reigns supreme in fields across the state of Iowa. However, amidst the amber waves of grain, a surprising revelation emerged from our research: a compelling correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Iowa's corn production and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. Yes, you read that right - we're about to embark on a journey from the humble maize crop to the domain of trendy apparel, exploring the unlikeliest of connections with the gravity of a scientist and the humor of a stand-up comedian.

The allure of Hollister stores, with their beach-inspired aesthetic and perpetually dim lighting, has long mystified shoppers and analysts alike. Meanwhile, GMOs, with their genetic modifications and scientific complexity, have been at the center of heated debates about agriculture and food systems. One might find it hard to believe that these two seemingly unrelated subjects could converge in a meaningful way. But as they say, truth can often be stranger than fiction.

As we dive into this perplexing puzzle, our intention is not only to entertain with quips and jests but to rigorously analyze and uncover the potential ties between two vastly different realms. By applying statistical scrutiny and leveraging data from reputable sources, we seek to unmask the underlying connection between the agricultural innovation taking place in the heartland and the global spread of surf-themed retail outlets.

Our findings promise to offer a mix of enlightenment and levity, shedding light on an unexpected relationship that may prompt an eyebrow raise or two. So, grab your lab coat and your best beach attire. It's time to unravel the corny connection between GMOs and Hollister store count.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maize to Model-Worthy Apparel: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Store Count"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unexpected link between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores. Tackling this quirky conundrum with verve, our study utilized USDA and Statista data to analyze the correlation between GMO corn production in Iowa and the spiky growth of cool, beach-themed fashion outlets worldwide. We calculated a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9865479 and p < 0.01, indicating a striking relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. While initially confounding, our findings shed light on the potential influence of agricultural innovation on the retail landscape, all while sprinkling in a few kernel of puns for good measure.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Corn, a staple of the American heartland and a symbol of agricultural prowess, reigns supreme in fields across the state of Iowa. However, amidst the amber waves of grain, a surprising revelation emerged from our research: a compelling correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Iowa's corn production and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. Yes, you read that right - we're about to embark on a journey from the humble maize crop to the domain of trendy apparel, exploring the unlikeliest of connections with the gravity of a scientist and the humor of a stand-up comedian.
The allure of Hollister stores, with their beach-inspired aesthetic and perpetually dim lighting, has long mystified shoppers and analysts alike. Meanwhile, GMOs, with their genetic modifications and scientific complexity, have been at the center of heated debates about agriculture and food systems. One might find it hard to believe that these two seemingly unrelated subjects could converge in a meaningful way. But as they say, truth can often be stranger than fiction.
As we dive into this perplexing puzzle, our intention is not only to entertain with quips and jests but to rigorously analyze and uncover the potential ties between two vastly different realms. By applying statistical scrutiny and leveraging data from reputable sources, we seek to unmask the underlying connection between the agricultural innovation taking place in the heartland and the global spread of surf-themed retail outlets.
Our findings promise to offer a mix of enlightenment and levity, shedding light on an unexpected relationship that may prompt an eyebrow raise or two. So, grab your lab coat and your best beach attire. It's time to unravel the corny connection between GMOs and Hollister store count.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the realm of agricultural innovation, Smith et al. (2018) uncovered fascinating insights into the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their impact on crop yields. Their meticulous study, published in the "Journal of Agricultural Science," delved into the complex interplay of genetic modifications and corn production, providing a solid foundation for understanding the implications of GMO usage in the heartland of the United States.

Furthermore, Doe and Jones (2020) conducted a comprehensive analysis of retail trends in their seminal work, "Retail Revolution: Unraveling the Mysteries of Consumer Behavior." Their exploration of the ever-evolving landscape of retail outlets unraveled intricate patterns, though they perhaps did not anticipate stumbling upon the curious correlation we are about to unveil.

Moving beyond the scholarly realm, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "GMO Sapiens" by Kristin N. Zimet both shed light on the broader societal discourse surrounding GMOs and their implications for food systems. While these works may not overtly touch on the retail sector, their discussions provide a thought-provoking backdrop for our investigation.

On the fiction front, even the realm of literary imagination offers inklings of relevance. Consider "The Corn Is Green" by Emlyn Williams and "The Retail Apocalypse" by David P. Warren. While these works may not explicitly tackle the corny connection we are exploring, one cannot help but ponder the intertwined nature of agriculture and consumerism.

But wait, there's more! In the digital sphere, social media echoes with rumblings of speculative musings. A tweeted hypothesis by @FashionistaForLife suggests a tantalizing link between GMO corn and the sudden surge of Hollister stores in beach-deprived locales, while a Reddit thread titled "GMOs: The Secret to Retail Domination?" teems with conspiracy theories and playful conjectures.

As we wade deeper into this unconventional nexus, we mustn't lose sight of the fact that truth can, indeed, be stranger than fiction. The rich tapestry of literature and discourse surrounding GMOs and retail phenomena may indeed hold clues to our corny conundrum.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maize to Model-Worthy Apparel: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Store Count"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unexpected link between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores. Tackling this quirky conundrum with verve, our study utilized USDA and Statista data to analyze the correlation between GMO corn production in Iowa and the spiky growth of cool, beach-themed fashion outlets worldwide. We calculated a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9865479 and p < 0.01, indicating a striking relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. While initially confounding, our findings shed light on the potential influence of agricultural innovation on the retail landscape, all while sprinkling in a few kernel of puns for good measure.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Corn, a staple of the American heartland and a symbol of agricultural prowess, reigns supreme in fields across the state of Iowa. However, amidst the amber waves of grain, a surprising revelation emerged from our research: a compelling correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Iowa's corn production and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. Yes, you read that right - we're about to embark on a journey from the humble maize crop to the domain of trendy apparel, exploring the unlikeliest of connections with the gravity of a scientist and the humor of a stand-up comedian.
The allure of Hollister stores, with their beach-inspired aesthetic and perpetually dim lighting, has long mystified shoppers and analysts alike. Meanwhile, GMOs, with their genetic modifications and scientific complexity, have been at the center of heated debates about agriculture and food systems. One might find it hard to believe that these two seemingly unrelated subjects could converge in a meaningful way. But as they say, truth can often be stranger than fiction.
As we dive into this perplexing puzzle, our intention is not only to entertain with quips and jests but to rigorously analyze and uncover the potential ties between two vastly different realms. By applying statistical scrutiny and leveraging data from reputable sources, we seek to unmask the underlying connection between the agricultural innovation taking place in the heartland and the global spread of surf-themed retail outlets.
Our findings promise to offer a mix of enlightenment and levity, shedding light on an unexpected relationship that may prompt an eyebrow raise or two. So, grab your lab coat and your best beach attire. It's time to unravel the corny connection between GMOs and Hollister store count.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To decipher the enigmatic association between GMO corn cultivation in Iowa and the burgeoning presence of Hollister retail stores worldwide, our research team embarked on a labyrinthine journey through the realms of statistical analysis and data gathering, armed with nothing but curiosity and a fondness for puns.

First and foremost, we scoured the digital expanse, traversing the virtual fields of the internet in search of pertinent data sources. Our primary harvest of information was gleaned from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, as these repositories bore the ripest fruits of agricultural and retail statistics. We focused our data collection efforts on the years spanning from 2000 to 2022, aiming to capture a comprehensive snapshot of the GMO corn landscape and the evolution of Hollister store counts across the globe.

With the raw data in hand, we wielded the formidable tools of quantitative analysis to peel back the layers of this intriguing conundrum. Employing robust statistical methods, we calculated correlation coefficients and conducted regression analyses with the gusto of adventurers delving into uncharted territory. Our aim was to reveal any significant patterns or relationships hidden within the tumultuous seas of numerical data, all the while sowing the seeds of scientific inquiry and sartorial humor.

In order to fortify our findings against the winds of skepticism, we scrutinized the statistical significance of our results, ensuring that any observed correlations between GMO corn production and the proliferation of Hollister stores were substantial enough to withstand the fierce scrutiny of the scholarly community. Moreover, we employed various sensitivity analyses and data visualization techniques to present our results with clarity and flair, much like a fashion designer showcasing a bold new collection.

While our research methods may not have involved literal corn mazes or non-GMO lab coats, they were nonetheless imbued with the spirit of adventure, curiosity, and a touch of whimsy. As we unraveled the intertwining strands of agricultural innovation and retail expansion, we remained vigilant in our pursuit of scientific rigor, all while sprinkling in a dash of levity to make the journey more vibrant and engaging.

In the end, our methodology served as a trusty compass, guiding us through the uncharted terrain of agricultural and retail data to unearth the surprising relationship between GMO corn growth in Iowa and the global propagation of Hollister stores. With our approach firmly rooted in empirical investigation and a penchant for the unexpected, we fervently hope that our findings plant the seeds of curiosity and amusement in the fertile minds of fellow researchers and enthusiasts alike.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9865479, r-squared of 0.9732767, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maize to Model-Worthy Apparel: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Store Count"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unexpected link between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores. Tackling this quirky conundrum with verve, our study utilized USDA and Statista data to analyze the correlation between GMO corn production in Iowa and the spiky growth of cool, beach-themed fashion outlets worldwide. We calculated a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9865479 and p < 0.01, indicating a striking relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. While initially confounding, our findings shed light on the potential influence of agricultural innovation on the retail landscape, all while sprinkling in a few kernel of puns for good measure.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Corn, a staple of the American heartland and a symbol of agricultural prowess, reigns supreme in fields across the state of Iowa. However, amidst the amber waves of grain, a surprising revelation emerged from our research: a compelling correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Iowa's corn production and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. Yes, you read that right - we're about to embark on a journey from the humble maize crop to the domain of trendy apparel, exploring the unlikeliest of connections with the gravity of a scientist and the humor of a stand-up comedian.
The allure of Hollister stores, with their beach-inspired aesthetic and perpetually dim lighting, has long mystified shoppers and analysts alike. Meanwhile, GMOs, with their genetic modifications and scientific complexity, have been at the center of heated debates about agriculture and food systems. One might find it hard to believe that these two seemingly unrelated subjects could converge in a meaningful way. But as they say, truth can often be stranger than fiction.
As we dive into this perplexing puzzle, our intention is not only to entertain with quips and jests but to rigorously analyze and uncover the potential ties between two vastly different realms. By applying statistical scrutiny and leveraging data from reputable sources, we seek to unmask the underlying connection between the agricultural innovation taking place in the heartland and the global spread of surf-themed retail outlets.
Our findings promise to offer a mix of enlightenment and levity, shedding light on an unexpected relationship that may prompt an eyebrow raise or two. So, grab your lab coat and your best beach attire. It's time to unravel the corny connection between GMOs and Hollister store count.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

RESULTS

The results of our analysis revealed a strikingly robust correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores from 2000 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9865479 and an r-squared value of 0.9732767 indicate a remarkably strong relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Not to toot our own horn, but we've certainly uncovered a-maize-ing findings that may surprise even the most seasoned researchers.

Figure 1 displays the scatterplot demonstrating the significant correlation, resembling a carefully organized cornfield with rows of data points neatly aligning themselves to the trend line. It's almost as if the GMO corn and Hollister store count are engaged in a coordinated dance, with each kernel of data swaying to the beat of our statistical analysis.

The high correlation coefficient and r-squared value emphasize the consistency and predictability of the relationship between GMO usage in Iowa's corn production and the proliferation of Hollister stores worldwide. While we're used to seeing "corny" jokes at the expense of GMOs, this correlation might just take the cake for being the corniest yet, in the most unexpected way.

In conclusion, our findings highlight a surprising and intriguing connection between agricultural innovation and the retail sector, underscoring the potential impact of GMOs on global fashion trends. This unanticipated relationship between GMO corn and Hollister stores adds a refreshing twist to the otherwise conventional narratives surrounding the agricultural and retail industries.

This discovery not only expands our understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate sectors but also adds a touch of whimsy to the often serious world of scientific investigation. Our research may have begun with a kernel of curiosity, but it has undoubtedly led to a cob-full of compelling insights and a healthier dose of humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Maize to Model-Worthy Apparel: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Store Count"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unexpected link between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores. Tackling this quirky conundrum with verve, our study utilized USDA and Statista data to analyze the correlation between GMO corn production in Iowa and the spiky growth of cool, beach-themed fashion outlets worldwide. We calculated a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9865479 and p < 0.01, indicating a striking relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. While initially confounding, our findings shed light on the potential influence of agricultural innovation on the retail landscape, all while sprinkling in a few kernel of puns for good measure.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the realm of agricultural innovation, Smith et al. (2018) uncovered fascinating insights into the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their impact on crop yields. Their meticulous study, published in the "Journal of Agricultural Science," delved into the complex interplay of genetic modifications and corn production, providing a solid foundation for understanding the implications of GMO usage in the heartland of the United States.
Furthermore, Doe and Jones (2020) conducted a comprehensive analysis of retail trends in their seminal work, "Retail Revolution: Unraveling the Mysteries of Consumer Behavior." Their exploration of the ever-evolving landscape of retail outlets unraveled intricate patterns, though they perhaps did not anticipate stumbling upon the curious correlation we are about to unveil.
Moving beyond the scholarly realm, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "GMO Sapiens" by Kristin N. Zimet both shed light on the broader societal discourse surrounding GMOs and their implications for food systems. While these works may not overtly touch on the retail sector, their discussions provide a thought-provoking backdrop for our investigation.
On the fiction front, even the realm of literary imagination offers inklings of relevance. Consider "The Corn Is Green" by Emlyn Williams and "The Retail Apocalypse" by David P. Warren. While these works may not explicitly tackle the corny connection we are exploring, one cannot help but ponder the intertwined nature of agriculture and consumerism.
But wait, there's more! In the digital sphere, social media echoes with rumblings of speculative musings. A tweeted hypothesis by @FashionistaForLife suggests a tantalizing link between GMO corn and the sudden surge of Hollister stores in beach-deprived locales, while a Reddit thread titled "GMOs: The Secret to Retail Domination?" teems with conspiracy theories and playful conjectures.
As we wade deeper into this unconventional nexus, we mustn't lose sight of the fact that truth can, indeed, be stranger than fiction. The rich tapestry of literature and discourse surrounding GMOs and retail phenomena may indeed hold clues to our corny conundrum.

[[RESULTS]]
RESULTS
The results of our analysis revealed a strikingly robust correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores from 2000 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9865479 and an r-squared value of 0.9732767 indicate a remarkably strong relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Not to toot our own horn, but we've certainly uncovered a-maize-ing findings that may surprise even the most seasoned researchers.
Figure 1 displays the scatterplot demonstrating the significant correlation, resembling a carefully organized cornfield with rows of data points neatly aligning themselves to the trend line. It's almost as if the GMO corn and Hollister store count are engaged in a coordinated dance, with each kernel of data swaying to the beat of our statistical analysis.
The high correlation coefficient and r-squared value emphasize the consistency and predictability of the relationship between GMO usage in Iowa's corn production and the proliferation of Hollister stores worldwide. While we're used to seeing "corny" jokes at the expense of GMOs, this correlation might just take the cake for being the corniest yet, in the most unexpected way.
In conclusion, our findings highlight a surprising and intriguing connection between agricultural innovation and the retail sector, underscoring the potential impact of GMOs on global fashion trends. This unanticipated relationship between GMO corn and Hollister stores adds a refreshing twist to the otherwise conventional narratives surrounding the agricultural and retail industries.
This discovery not only expands our understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate sectors but also adds a touch of whimsy to the often serious world of scientific investigation. Our research may have begun with a kernel of curiosity, but it has undoubtedly led to a cob-full of compelling insights and a healthier dose of humor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings provide robust support to the perplexing yet intriguing connection between GMO usage in corn grown in Iowa and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. Unearthing this unlikely correlation, our results underscore the potential impact of agricultural innovations on the global retail landscape, challenging conventional paradigms and injecting some much-needed lightheartedness into the realm of scholarly inquiry.

The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9865479, with a p-value of less than 0.01, corroborates the earlier work by Smith et al. (2018), who emphasized the transformative influence of GMOs on crop yields. It appears that the reach of GMOs extends beyond mere agricultural productivity to influence unexpected domains, much like discovering a hidden pocket in a pair of trendy cargo pants.

Moreover, our findings resonate with the retail trends analysis of Doe and Jones (2020), hinting at the previously uncharted territory of retail revolution. Who knew that beneath the glitzy façade of consumer behavior lay a field of genetically modified corn sowing the seeds of retail expansion? Perhaps this revelation might prompt a reimagining of "retail therapy" as "agri-retail therapy" – a concept worth pondering for its potential to revolutionize both the fashion and agricultural industries.

As for the “fiction front” within our literature review, the unexpected correlation between GMO corn and Hollister stores parallels the unpredictability of a plot twist in "The Corn Is Green." It seems that reality has, once again, proven itself to be the most creative storyteller, weaving a narrative that defies expectations and leaves us, much like the characters in a gripping novel, eager to decipher its underlying mystery.

In this unconventional nexus of agricultural innovation and global retail patterns, our research sheds light on the remarkable interconnectedness of seemingly disparate sectors. It appears that the relationship between GMO corn and Hollister stores is not merely a kernel of truth hidden amidst the chaff but, to our amazement, a fully grown cob of statistical significance – perhaps even the “ear”-resistible punchline in the grand joke of academic inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Maize to Model-Worthy Apparel: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Store Count"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper delves into the unexpected link between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores. Tackling this quirky conundrum with verve, our study utilized USDA and Statista data to analyze the correlation between GMO corn production in Iowa and the spiky growth of cool, beach-themed fashion outlets worldwide. We calculated a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9865479 and p < 0.01, indicating a striking relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. While initially confounding, our findings shed light on the potential influence of agricultural innovation on the retail landscape, all while sprinkling in a few kernel of puns for good measure.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Corn, a staple of the American heartland and a symbol of agricultural prowess, reigns supreme in fields across the state of Iowa. However, amidst the amber waves of grain, a surprising revelation emerged from our research: a compelling correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Iowa's corn production and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. Yes, you read that right - we're about to embark on a journey from the humble maize crop to the domain of trendy apparel, exploring the unlikeliest of connections with the gravity of a scientist and the humor of a stand-up comedian.
The allure of Hollister stores, with their beach-inspired aesthetic and perpetually dim lighting, has long mystified shoppers and analysts alike. Meanwhile, GMOs, with their genetic modifications and scientific complexity, have been at the center of heated debates about agriculture and food systems. One might find it hard to believe that these two seemingly unrelated subjects could converge in a meaningful way. But as they say, truth can often be stranger than fiction.
As we dive into this perplexing puzzle, our intention is not only to entertain with quips and jests but to rigorously analyze and uncover the potential ties between two vastly different realms. By applying statistical scrutiny and leveraging data from reputable sources, we seek to unmask the underlying connection between the agricultural innovation taking place in the heartland and the global spread of surf-themed retail outlets.
Our findings promise to offer a mix of enlightenment and levity, shedding light on an unexpected relationship that may prompt an eyebrow raise or two. So, grab your lab coat and your best beach attire. It's time to unravel the corny connection between GMOs and Hollister store count.

[[RESULTS]]
RESULTS
The results of our analysis revealed a strikingly robust correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores from 2000 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9865479 and an r-squared value of 0.9732767 indicate a remarkably strong relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Not to toot our own horn, but we've certainly uncovered a-maize-ing findings that may surprise even the most seasoned researchers.
Figure 1 displays the scatterplot demonstrating the significant correlation, resembling a carefully organized cornfield with rows of data points neatly aligning themselves to the trend line. It's almost as if the GMO corn and Hollister store count are engaged in a coordinated dance, with each kernel of data swaying to the beat of our statistical analysis.
The high correlation coefficient and r-squared value emphasize the consistency and predictability of the relationship between GMO usage in Iowa's corn production and the proliferation of Hollister stores worldwide. While we're used to seeing "corny" jokes at the expense of GMOs, this correlation might just take the cake for being the corniest yet, in the most unexpected way.
In conclusion, our findings highlight a surprising and intriguing connection between agricultural innovation and the retail sector, underscoring the potential impact of GMOs on global fashion trends. This unanticipated relationship between GMO corn and Hollister stores adds a refreshing twist to the otherwise conventional narratives surrounding the agricultural and retail industries.
This discovery not only expands our understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate sectors but also adds a touch of whimsy to the often serious world of scientific investigation. Our research may have begun with a kernel of curiosity, but it has undoubtedly led to a cob-full of compelling insights and a healthier dose of humor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

CONCLUSION

Amidst the cornstalks and clothing racks, our research has unveiled a kernel of truth in the unlikely relationship between GMO use in Iowa's corn production and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores. Our robust findings point to a significantly strong correlation, leaving no room for cob fusion about the existence of this connection. It seems the strands of our statistical analysis woven into this quirky narrative have yielded an a-maize-ing tapestry of results, showcasing the intertwined nature of agricultural innovation and the retail landscape. No need for more research - the verdict is in: GMOs and Hollister are as entwined as a cornstalk in a maze.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Maize to Model-Worthy Apparel: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Store Count. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Fashionology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Maize to Model-Worthy Apparel: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Store Count. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agri-Fashion Studies and Sustainability


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Maize to Model-Worthy Apparel: The Corny Connection Between GMOs and Hollister Store Count with an abstract of This research paper delves into the unexpected link between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores. Tackling this quirky conundrum with verve, our study utilized USDA and Statista data to analyze the correlation between GMO corn production in Iowa and the spiky growth of cool, beach-themed fashion outlets worldwide. We calculated a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9865479 and p < 0.01, indicating a striking relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. While initially confounding, our findings shed light on the potential influence of agricultural innovation on the retail landscape, all while sprinkling in a few kernel of puns for good measure.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn, Iowa, Hollister, retail stores, correlation, corn production, fashion outlets, USDA data, Statista, agricultural innovation, global proliferation, correlation coefficient, p-value, fashion retail landscape

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Iowa
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Iowa that is genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Iowa

Hollister retail store count worldwide
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Hollister retail store count worldwide

Correlation r = 0.9865479 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9732767 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hollister retail store count worldwide) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Iowa) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.3E-18. 0.0000000000000000052890383994
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 5.3E-16% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 189,070,285,463,127,328 random variables You don't actually need 189 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.97, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in corn grown in Iowa (GMO corn %)3032414554606478848690909191959392939392909393
Hollister retail store count worldwide (Store count)53288167249309383447510525540571589587568553543538542546497505529




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([30,32,41,45,54,60,64,78,84,86,90,90,91,91,95,93,92,93,93,92,90,93,93,])
array_2 = np.array([5,32,88,167,249,309,383,447,510,525,540,571,589,587,568,553,543,538,542,546,497,505,529,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Iowa"
array_2_name = "Hollister retail store count worldwide"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 1256 · Black Variable ID: 755 · Red Variable ID: 176
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0