about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,251 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and the second variable is Google searches for 'i cant even'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The corn became so a-maize-ing that it caused a kernel of existential crisis in anyone who consumed it. It's like they say, you are what you eat, and in this case, people were feeling corn-fused and just couldn't cob with the overwhelming sense of bewilderment. It was an ear-ational experience that left everyone in a state of utter husk-steria.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Concept art ] Generate an illustration of a vast Indiana countryside, with a sprawling cornfield dominating the landscape. The corn stalks loom prominently, standing tall and verdant against the clear blue sky. As the wind gently rustles the stalks, some of them appear to be contorting in curious, almost anthropomorphic ways, exuding an aura of bewilderment. Meanwhile, in the background, individuals can be observed, engrossed in their phones, their expressions transforming from curiosity to incredulity as they react to a flurry of bizarre search results. The juxtaposition between the serene countryside and the surreal behavior of the cornfield, alongside the puzzlement of the onlookers, should be the focal point of the image. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: The increase in GMO use in Indiana corn caused a surge in "i cant even" Google searches because the corn stalks started expressing their existential angst, leading to a contagious wave of confusion and disbelief among internet users.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre Scalar art Concept art Celtic art A black-and-white newspaper illustration
ChatGPT: Concept art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. The increase in GMO use in Indiana corn caused a surge in "i cant even" Google searches because the corn stalks started expressing their existential angst, leading to a contagious wave of confusion and disbelief among internet users.
ChatGPT: Imagine a cornfield stretching across the Indiana countryside under a clear sky. The corn stalks are tall and green, swaying gently in the breeze. Suddenly, some of the stalks start shaking and bending oddly, as if in a state of confusion. Nearby, people are seen staring at their phones, their expressions turning incredulous as they scroll through a barrage of strange search results.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a cornfield stretching across the Indiana countryside under a clear sky. The corn stalks are tall and green, swaying gently in the breeze. Suddenly, some of the stalks start shaking and bending oddly, as if in a state of confusion. Nearby, people are seen staring at their phones, their expressions turning incredulous as they scroll through a barrage of strange search results. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Concept art ] Generate an illustration of a vast Indiana countryside, with a sprawling cornfield dominating the landscape. The corn stalks loom prominently, standing tall and verdant against the clear blue sky. As the wind gently rustles the stalks, some of them appear to be contorting in curious, almost anthropomorphic ways, exuding an aura of bewilderment. Meanwhile, in the background, individuals can be observed, engrossed in their phones, their expressions transforming from curiosity to incredulity as they react to a flurry of bizarre search results. The juxtaposition between the serene countryside and the surreal behavior of the cornfield, alongside the puzzlement of the onlookers, should be the focal point of the image.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Indiana caused i cant even (Google searches for 'i cant even') to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
A-maize-ing Craze: GMOs Growing 'I Can't Even' in the Heartland

The Journal of Agricultural Absurdities

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8999290 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
A-maize-ing Craze: GMOs Growing 'I Can't Even' in the Heartland

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents the unexpected link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even'. Data from the USDA and Google Trends were utilized to establish and quantify this connection. The results revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8999290 and p < 0.01 from 2004 to 2023, suggesting a clear association between GMO corn production and this internet meme-related search term. Our findings raise important questions about the impact of agricultural practices on societal attitudes and behaviors, in addition to a few eyebrows. The implications of this study leave us corn-fused, reminding us to keep an ear to the ground for unexpected connections and to always husk for alternate explanations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A-maize-ing Craze: GMOs Growing 'I Can't Even' in the Heartland

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents the unexpected link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even'. Data from the USDA and Google Trends were utilized to establish and quantify this connection. The results revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8999290 and p < 0.01 from 2004 to 2023, suggesting a clear association between GMO corn production and this internet meme-related search term. Our findings raise important questions about the impact of agricultural practices on societal attitudes and behaviors, in addition to a few eyebrows. The implications of this study leave us corn-fused, reminding us to keep an ear to the ground for unexpected connections and to always husk for alternate explanations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The cultivation and consumption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a hot potato in both scientific and societal circles. While the debate over their potential impact on human health and the environment continues to simmer, little attention has been given to the potential connection between GMOs and pop culture phenomena. In this study, we focus on the unexpected marriage of GMO corn production in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even', a phrase synonymous with exasperation and disbelief, often accompanied by copious eye-rolling and heavy sighs.

As researchers, we are accustomed to peeling back the layers of complex relationships, but the uncanny correlation we uncovered between GMO use in corn and the 'i cant even' searches left us feeling like we had stumbled upon a kernel of truth in a haystack of data. The sheer un-cob-ventional nature of this association challenged our preconceived notions about the reach of agricultural practices into the digital realm. Refusing to shy away from the corny puns, we aim to share our findings without shucking any of the complexity of this intriguing interplay.

While the call for more empirical understanding of GMOs continues to ring out like a dinner bell in the research community, the scope of this study invites us to consider the potential ripple effects of agricultural decisions on the collective psyche of internet users. As we delve into the findings, it becomes clear that there is more than meets the husk in the GMO-corn-'i cant even' relationship. This research not only serves as a-maize-ing food for thought but also unveils the importance of approaching data analysis with an open mind and a willingness to embrace the seemingly absurd. So, let us harvest the fruits of our labor and dissect this synchronicity with a discerning eye, while also keeping our sense of humor intact.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A-maize-ing Craze: GMOs Growing 'I Can't Even' in the Heartland

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents the unexpected link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even'. Data from the USDA and Google Trends were utilized to establish and quantify this connection. The results revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8999290 and p < 0.01 from 2004 to 2023, suggesting a clear association between GMO corn production and this internet meme-related search term. Our findings raise important questions about the impact of agricultural practices on societal attitudes and behaviors, in addition to a few eyebrows. The implications of this study leave us corn-fused, reminding us to keep an ear to the ground for unexpected connections and to always husk for alternate explanations.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The cultivation and consumption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a hot potato in both scientific and societal circles. While the debate over their potential impact on human health and the environment continues to simmer, little attention has been given to the potential connection between GMOs and pop culture phenomena. In this study, we focus on the unexpected marriage of GMO corn production in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even', a phrase synonymous with exasperation and disbelief, often accompanied by copious eye-rolling and heavy sighs.
As researchers, we are accustomed to peeling back the layers of complex relationships, but the uncanny correlation we uncovered between GMO use in corn and the 'i cant even' searches left us feeling like we had stumbled upon a kernel of truth in a haystack of data. The sheer un-cob-ventional nature of this association challenged our preconceived notions about the reach of agricultural practices into the digital realm. Refusing to shy away from the corny puns, we aim to share our findings without shucking any of the complexity of this intriguing interplay.
While the call for more empirical understanding of GMOs continues to ring out like a dinner bell in the research community, the scope of this study invites us to consider the potential ripple effects of agricultural decisions on the collective psyche of internet users. As we delve into the findings, it becomes clear that there is more than meets the husk in the GMO-corn-'i cant even' relationship. This research not only serves as a-maize-ing food for thought but also unveils the importance of approaching data analysis with an open mind and a willingness to embrace the seemingly absurd. So, let us harvest the fruits of our labor and dissect this synchronicity with a discerning eye, while also keeping our sense of humor intact.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a topic of great interest and controversy in recent years. Studies show that GMOs are widely used in the cultivation of various crops, including corn, with the aim of increasing yield and resistance to pests. However, little attention has been given to the potential impact of GMO use on societal attitudes and behaviors, let alone on internet search trends for internet memes such as 'i cant even'.

Doe and Jones discuss the influence of agricultural practices on public perception and behavior in their seminal work. Their findings suggest that people's attitudes and emotional responses can be influenced by various external factors, including but not limited to the consumption of GMO products. However, their research did not delve into the specific relationship between GMO corn production and the prevalence of 'i cant even' searches.

The works of famous non-fiction authors such as Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" and Eric Schlosser's "Fast Food Nation" have shed light on the complex dynamics of food production and its implications for society. Although these works do not directly address the connection between GMOs in corn and internet search behavior, they provide valuable context for understanding the broader impact of agricultural practices on human behavior and cultural phenomena.

Turning to the realm of fiction, the novels of Margaret Atwood, particularly "Oryx and Crake," explore dystopian scenarios involving genetic engineering and its unintended consequences. While these works are speculative in nature, they offer imaginative insights into the potential societal repercussions of tampering with the genetic makeup of food crops.

Furthermore, the visual medium of cinema has depicted the intersection of scientific advancements and societal implications in films such as "Jurassic Park" and "Gattaca." While these films may not directly relate to the specific topic at hand, they serve as reminders of the unforeseen consequences that can arise from manipulating the natural order of things, be it through genetic engineering or otherwise.

The juxtaposition of these varied sources underscores the need for further investigation into the unanticipated link between GMO corn production and the frequency of 'i cant even' searches. The following sections present our empirical findings, probing the depths of this intriguing and somewhat corn-founding connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A-maize-ing Craze: GMOs Growing 'I Can't Even' in the Heartland

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents the unexpected link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even'. Data from the USDA and Google Trends were utilized to establish and quantify this connection. The results revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8999290 and p < 0.01 from 2004 to 2023, suggesting a clear association between GMO corn production and this internet meme-related search term. Our findings raise important questions about the impact of agricultural practices on societal attitudes and behaviors, in addition to a few eyebrows. The implications of this study leave us corn-fused, reminding us to keep an ear to the ground for unexpected connections and to always husk for alternate explanations.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The cultivation and consumption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a hot potato in both scientific and societal circles. While the debate over their potential impact on human health and the environment continues to simmer, little attention has been given to the potential connection between GMOs and pop culture phenomena. In this study, we focus on the unexpected marriage of GMO corn production in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even', a phrase synonymous with exasperation and disbelief, often accompanied by copious eye-rolling and heavy sighs.
As researchers, we are accustomed to peeling back the layers of complex relationships, but the uncanny correlation we uncovered between GMO use in corn and the 'i cant even' searches left us feeling like we had stumbled upon a kernel of truth in a haystack of data. The sheer un-cob-ventional nature of this association challenged our preconceived notions about the reach of agricultural practices into the digital realm. Refusing to shy away from the corny puns, we aim to share our findings without shucking any of the complexity of this intriguing interplay.
While the call for more empirical understanding of GMOs continues to ring out like a dinner bell in the research community, the scope of this study invites us to consider the potential ripple effects of agricultural decisions on the collective psyche of internet users. As we delve into the findings, it becomes clear that there is more than meets the husk in the GMO-corn-'i cant even' relationship. This research not only serves as a-maize-ing food for thought but also unveils the importance of approaching data analysis with an open mind and a willingness to embrace the seemingly absurd. So, let us harvest the fruits of our labor and dissect this synchronicity with a discerning eye, while also keeping our sense of humor intact.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the perplexing link between GMO corn production in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even', our research team embarked on a voyage through the virtual cornfields of internet data. We navigated the vast expanse of information with the aid of primary data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Google Trends, plowing through years of data from 2004 to 2023.

Our methodological approach involved harnessing the power of quantitative analysis to glean insights from this unexplored terrain. We harvested data on GMO corn production in Indiana from USDA sources, meticulously separating the modified from the unmodified. Armed with this agricultural bounty, we then reaped the temporal patterns of Google searches for 'i cant even' using Google Trends, carefully sieving through the digital haystack for relevant data nuggets.

The next step in our plow through the data involved aligning the temporal dimensions of GMO corn production and 'i cant even' searches to facilitate a fruitful comparison. We employed statistical analyses, including correlation coefficients and time-series modeling, to gauge the strength and direction of the association between these seemingly incongruous phenomena. Additionally, we cultivated a coterie of control variables to husk out any alternate explanations that might have otherwise stalked our findings like a silent crop thief in the night.

Furthermore, we conducted a sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of our findings, poring over the nuances of the data landscape to ensure our conclusions were firmly rooted in the empirical soil. Through an iterative process of data refinement, we aimed to weed out spurious associations and separate the proverbial GMO wheat from the chaff of statistical noise.

In cultivating this unorthodox research endeavor, we recognized the need to plow new ground and embrace unconventional methodologies. While traditional research practices may have planted doubt, we sowed the seeds of innovation and reaped a bountiful harvest of intriguing results. As we present the fruits of our labor, we encourage our scholarly peers to reap inspiration from our approach and consider sowing the seeds of inquiry in unexpected fields of study.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8999290, r-squared of 0.8098722, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
A-maize-ing Craze: GMOs Growing 'I Can't Even' in the Heartland

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents the unexpected link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even'. Data from the USDA and Google Trends were utilized to establish and quantify this connection. The results revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8999290 and p < 0.01 from 2004 to 2023, suggesting a clear association between GMO corn production and this internet meme-related search term. Our findings raise important questions about the impact of agricultural practices on societal attitudes and behaviors, in addition to a few eyebrows. The implications of this study leave us corn-fused, reminding us to keep an ear to the ground for unexpected connections and to always husk for alternate explanations.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The cultivation and consumption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a hot potato in both scientific and societal circles. While the debate over their potential impact on human health and the environment continues to simmer, little attention has been given to the potential connection between GMOs and pop culture phenomena. In this study, we focus on the unexpected marriage of GMO corn production in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even', a phrase synonymous with exasperation and disbelief, often accompanied by copious eye-rolling and heavy sighs.
As researchers, we are accustomed to peeling back the layers of complex relationships, but the uncanny correlation we uncovered between GMO use in corn and the 'i cant even' searches left us feeling like we had stumbled upon a kernel of truth in a haystack of data. The sheer un-cob-ventional nature of this association challenged our preconceived notions about the reach of agricultural practices into the digital realm. Refusing to shy away from the corny puns, we aim to share our findings without shucking any of the complexity of this intriguing interplay.
While the call for more empirical understanding of GMOs continues to ring out like a dinner bell in the research community, the scope of this study invites us to consider the potential ripple effects of agricultural decisions on the collective psyche of internet users. As we delve into the findings, it becomes clear that there is more than meets the husk in the GMO-corn-'i cant even' relationship. This research not only serves as a-maize-ing food for thought but also unveils the importance of approaching data analysis with an open mind and a willingness to embrace the seemingly absurd. So, let us harvest the fruits of our labor and dissect this synchronicity with a discerning eye, while also keeping our sense of humor intact.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Google Trends unearthed a surprising and statistically significant relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even'. The calculated correlation coefficient, a staggering 0.8999290, echoed through the research team like an unexpected pop of corn in a quiet microwave, leaving us momentarily startled and admittedly a-maize-d at the magnitude of this connection. This coefficient indicates a strong positive relationship between GMO corn production and the prevalence of exasperated internet users seeking solace in the digital chorus of 'i cant even'.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8098722 further corn-firmed the solidity of this association, illustrating that approximately 81% of the variability in the frequency of 'i cant even' searches can be explained by the use of GMOs in corn cultivation. This unexpected level of explained variation left us shell-shocked and confronted with the realization that perhaps there is more than just corn stalks growing in the fertile soil of Indiana.

The significance level, with p < 0.01, lowered the likelihood that this extraordinary association is due to random chance, highlighting the un-ear-thly nature of this correlation. The probability of these findings occurring by mere coincidence is as low as the chances of finding a non-GMO corn kernel in a bag of genetically modified ones.

Fig. 1 illustrates the corn-nection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Google searches for 'i cant even' with a striking scatterplot. The vigorous positive correlation between these variables is visually encapsulated in this figure, providing a pixelated portrait of the unexpected synchronicity discovered in this investigation.

In conclusion, the findings of the present study prod at the corn-ers of our understanding of the interplay between agricultural practices and digital culture, leaving us with a sense of intrigue and a chuckle at the whimsical nature of data analysis. The results emphasize the potential impact of seemingly unrelated factors on societal behaviors, urging us to remain vigilant and ever-curious about the unexplored avenues of influence.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
A-maize-ing Craze: GMOs Growing 'I Can't Even' in the Heartland

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents the unexpected link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even'. Data from the USDA and Google Trends were utilized to establish and quantify this connection. The results revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8999290 and p < 0.01 from 2004 to 2023, suggesting a clear association between GMO corn production and this internet meme-related search term. Our findings raise important questions about the impact of agricultural practices on societal attitudes and behaviors, in addition to a few eyebrows. The implications of this study leave us corn-fused, reminding us to keep an ear to the ground for unexpected connections and to always husk for alternate explanations.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a topic of great interest and controversy in recent years. Studies show that GMOs are widely used in the cultivation of various crops, including corn, with the aim of increasing yield and resistance to pests. However, little attention has been given to the potential impact of GMO use on societal attitudes and behaviors, let alone on internet search trends for internet memes such as 'i cant even'.
Doe and Jones discuss the influence of agricultural practices on public perception and behavior in their seminal work. Their findings suggest that people's attitudes and emotional responses can be influenced by various external factors, including but not limited to the consumption of GMO products. However, their research did not delve into the specific relationship between GMO corn production and the prevalence of 'i cant even' searches.
The works of famous non-fiction authors such as Michael Pollan's "The Omnivore's Dilemma" and Eric Schlosser's "Fast Food Nation" have shed light on the complex dynamics of food production and its implications for society. Although these works do not directly address the connection between GMOs in corn and internet search behavior, they provide valuable context for understanding the broader impact of agricultural practices on human behavior and cultural phenomena.
Turning to the realm of fiction, the novels of Margaret Atwood, particularly "Oryx and Crake," explore dystopian scenarios involving genetic engineering and its unintended consequences. While these works are speculative in nature, they offer imaginative insights into the potential societal repercussions of tampering with the genetic makeup of food crops.
Furthermore, the visual medium of cinema has depicted the intersection of scientific advancements and societal implications in films such as "Jurassic Park" and "Gattaca." While these films may not directly relate to the specific topic at hand, they serve as reminders of the unforeseen consequences that can arise from manipulating the natural order of things, be it through genetic engineering or otherwise.
The juxtaposition of these varied sources underscores the need for further investigation into the unanticipated link between GMO corn production and the frequency of 'i cant even' searches. The following sections present our empirical findings, probing the depths of this intriguing and somewhat corn-founding connection.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Google Trends unearthed a surprising and statistically significant relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even'. The calculated correlation coefficient, a staggering 0.8999290, echoed through the research team like an unexpected pop of corn in a quiet microwave, leaving us momentarily startled and admittedly a-maize-d at the magnitude of this connection. This coefficient indicates a strong positive relationship between GMO corn production and the prevalence of exasperated internet users seeking solace in the digital chorus of 'i cant even'.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8098722 further corn-firmed the solidity of this association, illustrating that approximately 81% of the variability in the frequency of 'i cant even' searches can be explained by the use of GMOs in corn cultivation. This unexpected level of explained variation left us shell-shocked and confronted with the realization that perhaps there is more than just corn stalks growing in the fertile soil of Indiana.
The significance level, with p < 0.01, lowered the likelihood that this extraordinary association is due to random chance, highlighting the un-ear-thly nature of this correlation. The probability of these findings occurring by mere coincidence is as low as the chances of finding a non-GMO corn kernel in a bag of genetically modified ones.
Fig. 1 illustrates the corn-nection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Google searches for 'i cant even' with a striking scatterplot. The vigorous positive correlation between these variables is visually encapsulated in this figure, providing a pixelated portrait of the unexpected synchronicity discovered in this investigation.
In conclusion, the findings of the present study prod at the corn-ers of our understanding of the interplay between agricultural practices and digital culture, leaving us with a sense of intrigue and a chuckle at the whimsical nature of data analysis. The results emphasize the potential impact of seemingly unrelated factors on societal behaviors, urging us to remain vigilant and ever-curious about the unexplored avenues of influence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study suggest a striking correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even'. Our findings support the prior research that has highlighted the potentially influential role of agricultural practices on societal attitudes and behaviors. Furthermore, this unexpected connection aligns with the broader context provided by Doe and Jones, who proposed that external factors, including the consumption of GMO products, can impact people's emotional responses and attitudes.

Interestingly, while our investigation may seem unconventional, it underscores the need for further exploration of the unanticipated and seemingly comical links between agricultural practices and digital culture. The corn-nection uncovered in our study extends the discussion initiated by non-fiction authors such as Michael Pollan and Eric Schlosser, urging us to consider the uncharted territories of societal repercussions arising from genetic engineering in food crops.

The substantial correlation coefficient obtained in our analysis echoes the sentiments expressed by Margaret Atwood in her speculative novel "Oryx and Crake," which delves into dystopian scenarios attributable to genetic engineering. Through our empirical findings, we have provided real-world evidence of the potential societal impact of manipulating the genetic makeup of crops, albeit in a more light-hearted domain of internet memes. This unexpected twist adds a layer of complexity to the implications of GMO use and serves as a corn-starch reminder of the unforeseen consequences of tampering with the natural order of things.

Our study also aligns with the absurdity depicted in films such as "Jurassic Park" and "Gattaca," reminding us of the potential ramifications that may stem from scientific advancements and genetic manipulation. The parallel drawn between these cinematic depictions and our real-world findings emphasizes the need to remain vigilant and open-minded as we navigate the dynamic interplay between scientific progress, agricultural practices, and societal trends.

In conclusion, our study not only strengthens the understanding of the unexpected link between GMO corn production and the frequency of 'i cant even' searches but also raises a metaphorical ear of corn to the intriguing and somewhat comical nature of these unexpected connections. This investigation rekindles the importance of staying a-maize-d by the whimsical nature of data analysis and the unforeseen pathways through which seemingly disparate elements may intersect.

(500 words)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
A-maize-ing Craze: GMOs Growing 'I Can't Even' in the Heartland

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents the unexpected link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even'. Data from the USDA and Google Trends were utilized to establish and quantify this connection. The results revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8999290 and p < 0.01 from 2004 to 2023, suggesting a clear association between GMO corn production and this internet meme-related search term. Our findings raise important questions about the impact of agricultural practices on societal attitudes and behaviors, in addition to a few eyebrows. The implications of this study leave us corn-fused, reminding us to keep an ear to the ground for unexpected connections and to always husk for alternate explanations.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The cultivation and consumption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have been a hot potato in both scientific and societal circles. While the debate over their potential impact on human health and the environment continues to simmer, little attention has been given to the potential connection between GMOs and pop culture phenomena. In this study, we focus on the unexpected marriage of GMO corn production in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even', a phrase synonymous with exasperation and disbelief, often accompanied by copious eye-rolling and heavy sighs.
As researchers, we are accustomed to peeling back the layers of complex relationships, but the uncanny correlation we uncovered between GMO use in corn and the 'i cant even' searches left us feeling like we had stumbled upon a kernel of truth in a haystack of data. The sheer un-cob-ventional nature of this association challenged our preconceived notions about the reach of agricultural practices into the digital realm. Refusing to shy away from the corny puns, we aim to share our findings without shucking any of the complexity of this intriguing interplay.
While the call for more empirical understanding of GMOs continues to ring out like a dinner bell in the research community, the scope of this study invites us to consider the potential ripple effects of agricultural decisions on the collective psyche of internet users. As we delve into the findings, it becomes clear that there is more than meets the husk in the GMO-corn-'i cant even' relationship. This research not only serves as a-maize-ing food for thought but also unveils the importance of approaching data analysis with an open mind and a willingness to embrace the seemingly absurd. So, let us harvest the fruits of our labor and dissect this synchronicity with a discerning eye, while also keeping our sense of humor intact.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Google Trends unearthed a surprising and statistically significant relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn grown in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even'. The calculated correlation coefficient, a staggering 0.8999290, echoed through the research team like an unexpected pop of corn in a quiet microwave, leaving us momentarily startled and admittedly a-maize-d at the magnitude of this connection. This coefficient indicates a strong positive relationship between GMO corn production and the prevalence of exasperated internet users seeking solace in the digital chorus of 'i cant even'.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8098722 further corn-firmed the solidity of this association, illustrating that approximately 81% of the variability in the frequency of 'i cant even' searches can be explained by the use of GMOs in corn cultivation. This unexpected level of explained variation left us shell-shocked and confronted with the realization that perhaps there is more than just corn stalks growing in the fertile soil of Indiana.
The significance level, with p < 0.01, lowered the likelihood that this extraordinary association is due to random chance, highlighting the un-ear-thly nature of this correlation. The probability of these findings occurring by mere coincidence is as low as the chances of finding a non-GMO corn kernel in a bag of genetically modified ones.
Fig. 1 illustrates the corn-nection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Google searches for 'i cant even' with a striking scatterplot. The vigorous positive correlation between these variables is visually encapsulated in this figure, providing a pixelated portrait of the unexpected synchronicity discovered in this investigation.
In conclusion, the findings of the present study prod at the corn-ers of our understanding of the interplay between agricultural practices and digital culture, leaving us with a sense of intrigue and a chuckle at the whimsical nature of data analysis. The results emphasize the potential impact of seemingly unrelated factors on societal behaviors, urging us to remain vigilant and ever-curious about the unexplored avenues of influence.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

The connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even' has undoubtedly popped some kernels of curiosity. The un-cob-vering of a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.8999290, akin to finding a perfectly popped corn kernel in a bag of un-popped ones, has raised eyebrows and elicited more than a few corn-y puns among the research team. This finding suggests that GMO corn production and the exasperated internet users seeking solace in the digital chorus of 'i cant even' are as closely linked as kernels on a cob.

The r-squared value of 0.8098722 resonates like the sound of kernels falling into a popcorn bowl, indicating that a-maize-ingly, approximately 81% of the variability in the frequency of 'i cant even' searches can be explained by the use of GMOs in corn cultivation. The significance level, with p < 0.01, lowers the likelihood that this extraordinary association is due to random chance, highlighting the un-ear-thly nature of this correlation. It's as clear as the kernels on an ear of corn that more research in this area is popping unnecessary, as we've certainly husked this topic to its core.

In a world full of surprises, the un-ex-pected marriage of GMO corn production and the frequency of 'i cant even' searches serves as a whimsical reminder of the a-maize-ing and uncharted territories in empirical research. Let this study stand as a reminder to embrace the unexpected in data analysis, and to never underestimate the potential for kernels of truth to be found in the seemingly un-poppable realms of research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited A-maize-ing Craze: GMOs Growing 'I Can't Even' in the Heartland. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Absurdities


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited A-maize-ing Craze: GMOs Growing 'I Can't Even' in the Heartland. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Anomalies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled A-maize-ing Craze: GMOs Growing 'I Can't Even' in the Heartland with an abstract of This research paper presents the unexpected link between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Indiana and the frequency of Google searches for 'i cant even'. Data from the USDA and Google Trends were utilized to establish and quantify this connection. The results revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8999290 and p < 0.01 from 2004 to 2023, suggesting a clear association between GMO corn production and this internet meme-related search term. Our findings raise important questions about the impact of agricultural practices on societal attitudes and behaviors, in addition to a few eyebrows. The implications of this study leave us corn-fused, reminding us to keep an ear to the ground for unexpected connections and to always husk for alternate explanations.

ChatGPT:

GMOs, genetically modified organisms, corn cultivation, Indiana, Google searches, 'i cant even', USDA, Google Trends, correlation coefficient, internet meme, search term, agricultural practices, societal attitudes, societal behaviors, unexpected connections

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Indiana
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Indiana genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Indiana

Google searches for 'i cant even'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i cant even' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i cant even'

Correlation r = 0.8999290 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8098722 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i cant even') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Indiana) over the 20 years from 2004 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.6E-8. 0.0000000661465263456361100000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 6.6E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 15,117,952 random variables You don't actually need 15 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.76, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in Indiana (GMO corn %)24123055555656607378767575777674787978
Google searches for 'i cant even' (Rel. search volume)11.83332433.58333234.7537.560.2563.333354.333363.2570.833374.7571.166772.41676355.916764.08336572.083382.1111




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2,4,12,30,55,55,56,56,60,73,78,76,75,75,77,76,74,78,79,78,])
array_2 = np.array([11.8333,24,33.5833,32,34.75,37.5,60.25,63.3333,54.3333,63.25,70.8333,74.75,71.1667,72.4167,63,55.9167,64.0833,65,72.0833,82.1111,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Indiana"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i cant even'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 1251 · Black Variable ID: 740 · Red Variable ID: 1525
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0