about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,241 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Butter consumption and the second variable is Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA.  The chart goes from 1990 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As butter consumption increased, people's fingers got greasier, leading to a higher likelihood of slipping when trying to operate their Mercedes-Benz vehicles. This, in turn, prompted a spike in automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA for safety concerns related to slippery controls and buttery interior surfaces. It seems that as butter met its destiny on toast, it also inadvertently buttered up the car industry, creating a slippery situation for Mercedes-Benz.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a whimsical illustration of a person standing inside a car, spreading a thick layer of butter on a piece of toast while attempting to steer with butter-slick fingers. As they take a bite, their fingers become slick with butter, and the car's steering wheel slips from their grasp. Depict the car swerving uncontrollably, triggering a series of Mercedes-Benz cars being recalled in a whimsical and playful style. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Because butter consumption led to slippery fingers, causing drivers to lose control and trigger automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cyber folk Whimsical illustration An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Whimsical illustration Data cyber art
ChatGPT: Whimsical illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Because butter consumption led to slippery fingers, causing drivers to lose control and trigger automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA.
ChatGPT: Imagine a person spreading a thick layer of butter on a piece of toast. As they take a bite, their fingers become slick with butter, making it difficult for them to grasp the steering wheel. This results in the person losing control of the car, which then swerves and triggers a series of Mercedes-Benz cars being recalled.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Whimsical illustration ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a person spreading a thick layer of butter on a piece of toast. As they take a bite, their fingers become slick with butter, making it difficult for them to grasp the steering wheel. This results in the person losing control of the car, which then swerves and triggers a series of Mercedes-Benz cars being recalled. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a whimsical illustration of a person standing inside a car, spreading a thick layer of butter on a piece of toast while attempting to steer with butter-slick fingers. As they take a bite, their fingers become slick with butter, and the car's steering wheel slips from their grasp. Depict the car swerving uncontrollably, triggering a series of Mercedes-Benz cars being recalled in a whimsical and playful style.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Butter consumption caused Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Spreading the Butter: A Slippery Correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

Journal of Eccentric Engineering

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8533394 and p < 0.01 for 1990 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Butter: A Slippery Correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the unexpected relationship between butter consumption and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, combining datasets from the USDA's butter consumption statistics and US DOT's records of automotive recalls. Our research reveals a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8533394, with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This "buttery" correlation prompts further investigation into potential causal factors and mechanisms underlying this curious link. Our findings add a whimsical dimension to the world of empirical research, inviting further exploration of the unconventional interplay between dietary habits and automotive engineering.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Butter: A Slippery Correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the unexpected relationship between butter consumption and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, combining datasets from the USDA's butter consumption statistics and US DOT's records of automotive recalls. Our research reveals a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8533394, with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This "buttery" correlation prompts further investigation into potential causal factors and mechanisms underlying this curious link. Our findings add a whimsical dimension to the world of empirical research, inviting further exploration of the unconventional interplay between dietary habits and automotive engineering.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, unveiling peculiar relationships that challenge our preconceived notions. In the realm of empirical research, we constantly encounter the interplay of seemingly disparate variables, urging us to scrutinize the underlying connections with an inquisitive eye. Our present inquiry delves into the peculiar correlation between butter consumption and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, an enigmatic association that has eluded conventional scientific inquiry.

As researchers, we are accustomed to navigating through complex datasets, unveiling hidden patterns and unraveling cryptic relationships. However, the serendipitous discovery of the pronounced correlation coefficient of 0.8533394 between butter consumption and Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls has indeed left us buttered up, so to speak. Much like the elusive slippery slope, this correlation has raised eyebrows and piqued our curiosity, prompting a further probing into the potential underlying mechanisms at play – a quest that resonates with equal parts scientific rigor and whimsy.

This unexpected nexus between dietary indulgences and engineering oversights opens a veritable cornucopia of possibilities for exploration. As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we find ourselves at the intersection of two realms seemingly worlds apart, yet whimsically interwoven by the fabric of empirical evidence. The correlation coefficient is indeed a testament to the power of statistics to unearth the unlikeliest of associations, reminding us that in the vast tapestry of empirical research, there often lurks a sprinkle of surprise and an unexpected swirl of humor. We invite fellow researchers to join us in this lighthearted yet rigorous exploration, as we spread the butter and uncover the slippery correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls. Let's churn these findings and butter up the scientific community with a dollop of unconventional insight.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Butter: A Slippery Correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the unexpected relationship between butter consumption and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, combining datasets from the USDA's butter consumption statistics and US DOT's records of automotive recalls. Our research reveals a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8533394, with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This "buttery" correlation prompts further investigation into potential causal factors and mechanisms underlying this curious link. Our findings add a whimsical dimension to the world of empirical research, inviting further exploration of the unconventional interplay between dietary habits and automotive engineering.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, unveiling peculiar relationships that challenge our preconceived notions. In the realm of empirical research, we constantly encounter the interplay of seemingly disparate variables, urging us to scrutinize the underlying connections with an inquisitive eye. Our present inquiry delves into the peculiar correlation between butter consumption and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, an enigmatic association that has eluded conventional scientific inquiry.
As researchers, we are accustomed to navigating through complex datasets, unveiling hidden patterns and unraveling cryptic relationships. However, the serendipitous discovery of the pronounced correlation coefficient of 0.8533394 between butter consumption and Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls has indeed left us buttered up, so to speak. Much like the elusive slippery slope, this correlation has raised eyebrows and piqued our curiosity, prompting a further probing into the potential underlying mechanisms at play – a quest that resonates with equal parts scientific rigor and whimsy.
This unexpected nexus between dietary indulgences and engineering oversights opens a veritable cornucopia of possibilities for exploration. As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we find ourselves at the intersection of two realms seemingly worlds apart, yet whimsically interwoven by the fabric of empirical evidence. The correlation coefficient is indeed a testament to the power of statistics to unearth the unlikeliest of associations, reminding us that in the vast tapestry of empirical research, there often lurks a sprinkle of surprise and an unexpected swirl of humor. We invite fellow researchers to join us in this lighthearted yet rigorous exploration, as we spread the butter and uncover the slippery correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls. Let's churn these findings and butter up the scientific community with a dollop of unconventional insight.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To contextualize the unanticipated but distinctly buttery correlation between butter consumption and Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls, a comprehensive review of the existing literature is essential. This review aims to incorporate a range of sources, from scholarly articles to data-driven reports, in order to elucidate the enigmatic connection that has captivated the research community.

In "Butter and Its Role in Human Nutrition," Smith et al. provide a thorough examination of the nutritional components of butter, emphasizing its prevalence in Western dietary habits. The study offers valuable insights into the historical and contemporary consumption patterns of butter, laying the foundation for understanding its potential influence on diverse aspects of human life, including, as our research suggests, automotive engineering.

Doe and Jones, in their research on "Quality Control in Automotive Manufacturing," delve into the intricate processes involved in ensuring the safety and reliability of automotive products. Their meticulous analysis of engineering standards and production protocols offers a comprehensive overview of the multifaceted considerations that underpin automotive manufacturing, steering us toward potential explanations for the buttery correlation that has piqued our curiosity.

The intersection of gastronomy and automotive engineering, albeit peculiar, finds resonance in non-fiction works such as "The Butter Battle Book" by Dr. Seuss and "Like Water for Chocolate" by Laura Esquivel. The allegorical and culinary themes presented in these literary works evoke contemplation on the unorthodox relationship between dietary choices and mechanical prowess, providing a whimsical yet thought-provoking backdrop to our research inquiry.

In a more contemporary context, internet memes, such as the "Buttered Cat Paradox" and "Distracted Boyfriend," humorously illustrate unexpected juxtapositions and serendipitous correlations, echoing the essence of our findings. These memes, albeit lighthearted, encapsulate the essence of our scholarly escapade, reminding us of the delightful surprises that lurk within seemingly incongruous associations.

As we navigate through this research, we must not only grapple with the statistical significance and empirical data but also embrace the delightful idiosyncrasies that underscore our pursuit of knowledge. With this broadened perspective, we are poised to unravel the whimsical nuances of the buttery correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls, inviting fellow researchers to join us in this journey of scholarly inquiry and unanticipated humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and US DOT . You used data from 1990 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Butter: A Slippery Correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the unexpected relationship between butter consumption and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, combining datasets from the USDA's butter consumption statistics and US DOT's records of automotive recalls. Our research reveals a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8533394, with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This "buttery" correlation prompts further investigation into potential causal factors and mechanisms underlying this curious link. Our findings add a whimsical dimension to the world of empirical research, inviting further exploration of the unconventional interplay between dietary habits and automotive engineering.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, unveiling peculiar relationships that challenge our preconceived notions. In the realm of empirical research, we constantly encounter the interplay of seemingly disparate variables, urging us to scrutinize the underlying connections with an inquisitive eye. Our present inquiry delves into the peculiar correlation between butter consumption and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, an enigmatic association that has eluded conventional scientific inquiry.
As researchers, we are accustomed to navigating through complex datasets, unveiling hidden patterns and unraveling cryptic relationships. However, the serendipitous discovery of the pronounced correlation coefficient of 0.8533394 between butter consumption and Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls has indeed left us buttered up, so to speak. Much like the elusive slippery slope, this correlation has raised eyebrows and piqued our curiosity, prompting a further probing into the potential underlying mechanisms at play – a quest that resonates with equal parts scientific rigor and whimsy.
This unexpected nexus between dietary indulgences and engineering oversights opens a veritable cornucopia of possibilities for exploration. As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we find ourselves at the intersection of two realms seemingly worlds apart, yet whimsically interwoven by the fabric of empirical evidence. The correlation coefficient is indeed a testament to the power of statistics to unearth the unlikeliest of associations, reminding us that in the vast tapestry of empirical research, there often lurks a sprinkle of surprise and an unexpected swirl of humor. We invite fellow researchers to join us in this lighthearted yet rigorous exploration, as we spread the butter and uncover the slippery correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls. Let's churn these findings and butter up the scientific community with a dollop of unconventional insight.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

As we delved into the seemingly buttery world of empirical research, our methodology sought to unravel the tantalizing correlation between butter consumption and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Our research design blended a touch of whimsy with the rigors of scientific investigation, resulting in an approach that mirrored the enigmatic nature of our unexpected findings.

Data Collection:
Our first step involved trawling the digital expanse of the internet to gather an extensive dataset encompassing butter consumption and automotive recalls. We primarily relied on the illustrious sources of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for butter consumption statistics and the esteemed records of the United States Department of Transportation (US DOT) for automotive recalls. The data spanned a period from 1990 to 2021, capturing the rich tapestry of dietary proclivities and vehicular tribulations across over three decades.

Buttering Up the Variables:
To establish a robust foundation for our analysis, we meticulously assembled variables that reflected the nuances of butter consumption and automotive recalls. Our butter consumption variable encompassed per capita consumption of butter in pounds, encapsulating the creaminess of dietary habits across different regions and temporal epochs. On the vehicular front, the automotive recall variable spanned the number of recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, reflecting the vicissitudes of automotive engineering and the capriciousness of vehicular imperfections.

Baking the Correlation:
With our variables primed and our datasets curated, we embarked on the grand experiment of uncovering the correlation that lay hidden beneath the veils of statistical obscurity. Employing the venerable tool of Pearson's correlation coefficient, we set out to unravel the enigmatic interplay between butter consumption and automotive recalls. The resulting correlation coefficient of 0.8533394 emerged as the pièce de résistance, serving as the veritable cherry on top of our empirical confectionery.

Butterproofing the Analysis:
No confection is complete without a dash of methodological rigor. To affirm the robustness of our findings, we subjected our correlation analysis to the stern gaze of statistical significance testing. Employing the venerable p-value, we established a significance level of p < 0.01, fortifying our empirical delicacy with a shield of statistical credibility.

A Dollop of Causality:
While our correlation analysis has adorned the scientific tableau with its buttery allure, we recognize the need for a more nuanced exploration of potential causal mechanisms. Future explorations, perhaps through the prism of structural equation modeling or longitudinal analyses, could whisk us closer to unraveling the underlying connections between buttery indulgences and automotive engineering foibles.

In summary, our methodology has meticulously navigated the quixotic realms of butter consumption and automotive recalls, blending whimsical curiosity with the meticulous rigor of scientific inquiry. We welcome fellow scholars to partake in this journey, as we churn the creamy interplay between butter consumption and Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls. Let's spread the delightful findings and butter up the scientific endeavor with a liberally applied dollop of unconventional insight and perhaps a sprinkle of whimsy!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and US DOT .

For the time period 1990 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8533394, r-squared of 0.7281881, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Butter: A Slippery Correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the unexpected relationship between butter consumption and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, combining datasets from the USDA's butter consumption statistics and US DOT's records of automotive recalls. Our research reveals a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8533394, with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This "buttery" correlation prompts further investigation into potential causal factors and mechanisms underlying this curious link. Our findings add a whimsical dimension to the world of empirical research, inviting further exploration of the unconventional interplay between dietary habits and automotive engineering.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, unveiling peculiar relationships that challenge our preconceived notions. In the realm of empirical research, we constantly encounter the interplay of seemingly disparate variables, urging us to scrutinize the underlying connections with an inquisitive eye. Our present inquiry delves into the peculiar correlation between butter consumption and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, an enigmatic association that has eluded conventional scientific inquiry.
As researchers, we are accustomed to navigating through complex datasets, unveiling hidden patterns and unraveling cryptic relationships. However, the serendipitous discovery of the pronounced correlation coefficient of 0.8533394 between butter consumption and Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls has indeed left us buttered up, so to speak. Much like the elusive slippery slope, this correlation has raised eyebrows and piqued our curiosity, prompting a further probing into the potential underlying mechanisms at play – a quest that resonates with equal parts scientific rigor and whimsy.
This unexpected nexus between dietary indulgences and engineering oversights opens a veritable cornucopia of possibilities for exploration. As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we find ourselves at the intersection of two realms seemingly worlds apart, yet whimsically interwoven by the fabric of empirical evidence. The correlation coefficient is indeed a testament to the power of statistics to unearth the unlikeliest of associations, reminding us that in the vast tapestry of empirical research, there often lurks a sprinkle of surprise and an unexpected swirl of humor. We invite fellow researchers to join us in this lighthearted yet rigorous exploration, as we spread the butter and uncover the slippery correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls. Let's churn these findings and butter up the scientific community with a dollop of unconventional insight.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the curious relationship between butter consumption and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA has yielded some perplexing yet intriguing results. The analysis of data spanning from 1990 to 2021 has revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8533394, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.7281881. Moreover, the statistical significance of this correlation is underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust association that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.

Upon scrutinizing the scatterplot representation (Fig. 1) of the correlation between butter consumption and Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls, we are confronted with a visually compelling depiction of the seemingly incongruous relationship. The points on the scatterplot form a strikingly linear pattern, firmly establishing the robust nature of the observed correlation. This alignment of data points stands as a testament to the unexpected convergence of buttery indulgences and mechanical misgivings, drawing attention to the peculiar interplay between these seemingly disparate domains.

Our findings not only underscore the statistical robustness of the observed correlation but also beckon us to unravel the underlying mechanisms at play. The pronounced strength of the correlation coefficient implies a substantive relationship between butter consumption and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. This linkage invites speculation about the potential influence of dietary habits on engineering oversights, a notion that, while whimsical, warrants further exploration.

In light of these intriguing results, we cannot help but be intrigued by the enigmatic interplay between butter consumption and automotive engineering faux pas. This unexpected correlation adds a whimsical tint to the canvas of empirical research, embodying the spirit of scientific inquiry as an adventure filled with surprises and unforeseen connections. As we delve into the uncharted territory of butter-induced automotive maladies, we are reminded of the humorous undercurrents that enliven our pursuit of knowledge, prompting us to approach our investigation with equal measures of scientific rigor and lighthearted curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Butter: A Slippery Correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the unexpected relationship between butter consumption and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, combining datasets from the USDA's butter consumption statistics and US DOT's records of automotive recalls. Our research reveals a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8533394, with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This "buttery" correlation prompts further investigation into potential causal factors and mechanisms underlying this curious link. Our findings add a whimsical dimension to the world of empirical research, inviting further exploration of the unconventional interplay between dietary habits and automotive engineering.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To contextualize the unanticipated but distinctly buttery correlation between butter consumption and Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls, a comprehensive review of the existing literature is essential. This review aims to incorporate a range of sources, from scholarly articles to data-driven reports, in order to elucidate the enigmatic connection that has captivated the research community.
In "Butter and Its Role in Human Nutrition," Smith et al. provide a thorough examination of the nutritional components of butter, emphasizing its prevalence in Western dietary habits. The study offers valuable insights into the historical and contemporary consumption patterns of butter, laying the foundation for understanding its potential influence on diverse aspects of human life, including, as our research suggests, automotive engineering.
Doe and Jones, in their research on "Quality Control in Automotive Manufacturing," delve into the intricate processes involved in ensuring the safety and reliability of automotive products. Their meticulous analysis of engineering standards and production protocols offers a comprehensive overview of the multifaceted considerations that underpin automotive manufacturing, steering us toward potential explanations for the buttery correlation that has piqued our curiosity.
The intersection of gastronomy and automotive engineering, albeit peculiar, finds resonance in non-fiction works such as "The Butter Battle Book" by Dr. Seuss and "Like Water for Chocolate" by Laura Esquivel. The allegorical and culinary themes presented in these literary works evoke contemplation on the unorthodox relationship between dietary choices and mechanical prowess, providing a whimsical yet thought-provoking backdrop to our research inquiry.
In a more contemporary context, internet memes, such as the "Buttered Cat Paradox" and "Distracted Boyfriend," humorously illustrate unexpected juxtapositions and serendipitous correlations, echoing the essence of our findings. These memes, albeit lighthearted, encapsulate the essence of our scholarly escapade, reminding us of the delightful surprises that lurk within seemingly incongruous associations.
As we navigate through this research, we must not only grapple with the statistical significance and empirical data but also embrace the delightful idiosyncrasies that underscore our pursuit of knowledge. With this broadened perspective, we are poised to unravel the whimsical nuances of the buttery correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls, inviting fellow researchers to join us in this journey of scholarly inquiry and unanticipated humor.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the curious relationship between butter consumption and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA has yielded some perplexing yet intriguing results. The analysis of data spanning from 1990 to 2021 has revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8533394, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.7281881. Moreover, the statistical significance of this correlation is underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust association that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.
Upon scrutinizing the scatterplot representation (Fig. 1) of the correlation between butter consumption and Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls, we are confronted with a visually compelling depiction of the seemingly incongruous relationship. The points on the scatterplot form a strikingly linear pattern, firmly establishing the robust nature of the observed correlation. This alignment of data points stands as a testament to the unexpected convergence of buttery indulgences and mechanical misgivings, drawing attention to the peculiar interplay between these seemingly disparate domains.
Our findings not only underscore the statistical robustness of the observed correlation but also beckon us to unravel the underlying mechanisms at play. The pronounced strength of the correlation coefficient implies a substantive relationship between butter consumption and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. This linkage invites speculation about the potential influence of dietary habits on engineering oversights, a notion that, while whimsical, warrants further exploration.
In light of these intriguing results, we cannot help but be intrigued by the enigmatic interplay between butter consumption and automotive engineering faux pas. This unexpected correlation adds a whimsical tint to the canvas of empirical research, embodying the spirit of scientific inquiry as an adventure filled with surprises and unforeseen connections. As we delve into the uncharted territory of butter-induced automotive maladies, we are reminded of the humorous undercurrents that enliven our pursuit of knowledge, prompting us to approach our investigation with equal measures of scientific rigor and lighthearted curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The substantial association between butter consumption and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, as evidenced by our correlation coefficient of 0.8533394 and a p-value of less than 0.01, raises a "buttery" conundrum that tickles the imagination. These findings echo the idiosyncratic musings from the literature review, such as the weighty discourse on the nutritional aspects of butter and the whimsical tales of "The Butter Battle Book" and "Like Water for Chocolate." While seemingly comical, these references serve as poignant reminders of the multi-layered nature of our inquiry.

The statistically robust correlation strengthens and extends the initial observations of the unforeseen connections between culinary habits and automotive engineering missteps. It is intriguing to note how our results align with the lighthearted juxtapositions seen in internet memes, thus reaffirming the delightful idiosyncrasies that underpin empirical investigations. These unexpected revelations remind us that science is not always so cookie-cutter, and it's essential to butter up to the humorous anomalies that may lurk within statistical analyses.

Furthermore, the scatterplot depiction of the correlation between butter consumption and Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls provides a visually striking testament to this unexpected relationship, presenting a "buttery" linear pattern that piques the imagination. This visual representation whimsically underscores the robust nature of the correlation, urging future investigators to butter themselves up for the unexpected nuances embedded within such scientific inquiries.

As we sift through this whimsical interplay between butter consumption and automotive maladies, we are reminded of the eclectic nature of scholarly escapades, where scientific rigor harmonizes with lighthearted curiosity. The unexpected convergence of buttery indulgences and mechanical misgivings not only enriches our pursuit of knowledge but also infuses it with a sprinkle of whimsy. The "buttery" correlation demonstrates that empirical research is not always cut and dry; sometimes, it spreads into unexpected nooks, inviting us to savor the richness of unconventional discoveries.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Butter consumption and Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Spreading the Butter: A Slippery Correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examine the unexpected relationship between butter consumption and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, combining datasets from the USDA's butter consumption statistics and US DOT's records of automotive recalls. Our research reveals a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8533394, with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This "buttery" correlation prompts further investigation into potential causal factors and mechanisms underlying this curious link. Our findings add a whimsical dimension to the world of empirical research, inviting further exploration of the unconventional interplay between dietary habits and automotive engineering.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The pursuit of knowledge often leads us down unexpected paths, unveiling peculiar relationships that challenge our preconceived notions. In the realm of empirical research, we constantly encounter the interplay of seemingly disparate variables, urging us to scrutinize the underlying connections with an inquisitive eye. Our present inquiry delves into the peculiar correlation between butter consumption and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, an enigmatic association that has eluded conventional scientific inquiry.
As researchers, we are accustomed to navigating through complex datasets, unveiling hidden patterns and unraveling cryptic relationships. However, the serendipitous discovery of the pronounced correlation coefficient of 0.8533394 between butter consumption and Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls has indeed left us buttered up, so to speak. Much like the elusive slippery slope, this correlation has raised eyebrows and piqued our curiosity, prompting a further probing into the potential underlying mechanisms at play – a quest that resonates with equal parts scientific rigor and whimsy.
This unexpected nexus between dietary indulgences and engineering oversights opens a veritable cornucopia of possibilities for exploration. As we embark on this scholarly escapade, we find ourselves at the intersection of two realms seemingly worlds apart, yet whimsically interwoven by the fabric of empirical evidence. The correlation coefficient is indeed a testament to the power of statistics to unearth the unlikeliest of associations, reminding us that in the vast tapestry of empirical research, there often lurks a sprinkle of surprise and an unexpected swirl of humor. We invite fellow researchers to join us in this lighthearted yet rigorous exploration, as we spread the butter and uncover the slippery correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls. Let's churn these findings and butter up the scientific community with a dollop of unconventional insight.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the curious relationship between butter consumption and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA has yielded some perplexing yet intriguing results. The analysis of data spanning from 1990 to 2021 has revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8533394, coupled with an r-squared value of 0.7281881. Moreover, the statistical significance of this correlation is underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a robust association that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance.
Upon scrutinizing the scatterplot representation (Fig. 1) of the correlation between butter consumption and Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls, we are confronted with a visually compelling depiction of the seemingly incongruous relationship. The points on the scatterplot form a strikingly linear pattern, firmly establishing the robust nature of the observed correlation. This alignment of data points stands as a testament to the unexpected convergence of buttery indulgences and mechanical misgivings, drawing attention to the peculiar interplay between these seemingly disparate domains.
Our findings not only underscore the statistical robustness of the observed correlation but also beckon us to unravel the underlying mechanisms at play. The pronounced strength of the correlation coefficient implies a substantive relationship between butter consumption and the frequency of automotive recalls by Mercedes-Benz USA. This linkage invites speculation about the potential influence of dietary habits on engineering oversights, a notion that, while whimsical, warrants further exploration.
In light of these intriguing results, we cannot help but be intrigued by the enigmatic interplay between butter consumption and automotive engineering faux pas. This unexpected correlation adds a whimsical tint to the canvas of empirical research, embodying the spirit of scientific inquiry as an adventure filled with surprises and unforeseen connections. As we delve into the uncharted territory of butter-induced automotive maladies, we are reminded of the humorous undercurrents that enliven our pursuit of knowledge, prompting us to approach our investigation with equal measures of scientific rigor and lighthearted curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we wrap up our study on the “buttery” correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls, we find ourselves stirred, not shaken, by the unexpected union of dairy delights and vehicular vicissitudes. Our findings have whipped up a rich and creamy mousseline of statistical significance, leaving us with a taste for further exploration. While the results may seem like the ultimate spread of coincidence, the robust correlation coefficient and p-value suggest that we are not just churning air.

The visually striking scatterplot paints a picture of buttery indulgences and mechanical mishaps entwined in a dance of statistical significance, inviting us to ponder the flavors of causality and the butterfingers phenomenon. Yet, as we unfold the layers of this unorthodox correlation, we must exercise caution not to spread ourselves too thin in drawing causal inferences from the associations observed, as correlation does not imply causation, as all good bakers and researchers know.

In conclusion, our investigation into the relationship between butter consumption and Mercedes-Benz USA automotive recalls has highlighted the capricious whimsy that often accompanies empirical research, drawing attention to the unexpected harmonies that abide within seemingly incongruent domains. We are left with a profound sense of wonder and curiosity, akin to stumbling upon an enigmatic recipe for empirical intrigue. With this, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as we believe that we have thoroughly churned through the creamy depths of this subject matter.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Spreading the Butter: A Slippery Correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Eccentric Engineering


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Spreading the Butter: A Slippery Correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Advanced Dairy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Spreading the Butter: A Slippery Correlation with Mercedes-Benz USA Automotive Recalls with an abstract of In this study, we examine the unexpected relationship between butter consumption and automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA, combining datasets from the USDA's butter consumption statistics and US DOT's records of automotive recalls. Our research reveals a surprisingly robust correlation coefficient of 0.8533394, with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 1990 to 2021. This "buttery" correlation prompts further investigation into potential causal factors and mechanisms underlying this curious link. Our findings add a whimsical dimension to the world of empirical research, inviting further exploration of the unconventional interplay between dietary habits and automotive engineering.

ChatGPT:

"butter consumption statistics, automotive recalls, Mercedes-Benz USA, USDA butter consumption, US DOT automotive recalls, correlation coefficient, causal factors, mechanisms, dietary habits, automotive engineering"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Butter consumption
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of Butter in the US
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with Butter consumption

Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA
Detailed data title: Automotive recals issued by Mercedes-Benz USA
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA

Correlation r = 0.8533394 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7281881 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 72.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Butter consumption) over the 32 years from 1990 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.5E-10. 0.0000000005466759005300166000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 5.5E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,829,237,395 random variables You don't actually need 1 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 31 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 31 because we have two variables measured over a period of 32 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.72, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Butter consumption (Pounds per person)4.34.44.34.74.74.64.34.24.34.64.54.34.44.54.54.54.74.7554.95.45.55.55.55.65.75.766.26.36.5
Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA (Recalls)311322312446534553833484618233839333849




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.3,4.4,4.3,4.7,4.7,4.6,4.3,4.2,4.3,4.6,4.5,4.3,4.4,4.5,4.5,4.5,4.7,4.7,5,5,4.9,5.4,5.5,5.5,5.5,5.6,5.7,5.7,6,6.2,6.3,6.5,])
array_2 = np.array([3,1,1,3,2,2,3,1,2,4,4,6,5,3,4,5,5,3,8,3,3,4,8,4,6,18,23,38,39,33,38,49,])
array_1_name = "Butter consumption"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls issued by Mercedes-Benz USA"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 1241 · Black Variable ID: 557 · Red Variable ID: 1122
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0