about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,181 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Patents granted in the US and the second variable is Fossil fuel use in Algeria.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The surge in patented inventions in the US led to a boom in newfangled gadgets and gizmos. This, in turn, created a heightened demand for electricity, causing Algeria to ramp up its fossil fuel use to keep up with the increased production of electricity-guzzling contraptions. It's like the US patents sparked a power struggle, and Algeria had to fuel it by burning more fossil fuels!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a Discovery magazine cover depicting a bustling U.S. Patent Office on the left, where inventors showcase their latest creations and exchange ideas, and an expansive desert landscape in Algeria on the right, with drilling rigs and scientists working on fossil fuel exploration. The scenes should be connected by an invisible thread, symbolizing the surprising correlation between the two variables. The visual should keep the depiction simple and not include any words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: "Surprising Correlation Found: Increase in US Patents Linked to Rise in Fossil Fuel Use in Algeria A recent study has uncovered a seemingly bizarre connection between the number of patents granted in the United States and the surge in fossil fuel use in Algeria. According to the research, as the US Patent Office approved more innovative ideas and inventions, it inadvertently sparked a renewed interest in fossil fuel exploration in Algeria. Experts speculate that the influx of new patents may have inadvertently inspired Algerian scientists and entrepreneurs to 'dig deep' for their own resources, leading to this unexpected correlation.". Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: High-tech Vaporwave A Discovery magazine cover image A photo-realistic image A black-and-white newspaper illustration
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. "Surprising Correlation Found: Increase in US Patents Linked to Rise in Fossil Fuel Use in Algeria A recent study has uncovered a seemingly bizarre connection between the number of patents granted in the United States and the surge in fossil fuel use in Algeria. According to the research, as the US Patent Office approved more innovative ideas and inventions, it inadvertently sparked a renewed interest in fossil fuel exploration in Algeria. Experts speculate that the influx of new patents may have inadvertently inspired Algerian scientists and entrepreneurs to 'dig deep' for their own resources, leading to this unexpected correlation."
ChatGPT: In a visual scene, you would see two separate images side by side. On the left, you'd see a bustling U.S. Patent Office, with inventors showcasing their latest creations and exchanging ideas. On the right, you'd see an expansive desert landscape in Algeria, with drilling rigs and scientists working on fossil fuel exploration. The scenes would be connected by an invisible thread, symbolizing the surprising correlation between the two variables.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a visual scene, you would see two separate images side by side. On the left, you'd see a bustling U.S. Patent Office, with inventors showcasing their latest creations and exchanging ideas. On the right, you'd see an expansive desert landscape in Algeria, with drilling rigs and scientists working on fossil fuel exploration. The scenes would be connected by an invisible thread, symbolizing the surprising correlation between the two variables. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a Discovery magazine cover depicting a bustling U.S. Patent Office on the left, where inventors showcase their latest creations and exchange ideas, and an expansive desert landscape in Algeria on the right, with drilling rigs and scientists working on fossil fuel exploration. The scenes should be connected by an invisible thread, symbolizing the surprising correlation between the two variables. The visual should keep the depiction simple and not include any words or speech bubbles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Patents granted in the US caused Fossil fuel use in Algeria to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fueling Innovation: The Petroleum Paradox - A Correlation between US Patents and Fossil Fuel Use in Algeria

The Journal of Energy Economics and Eccentric Discoveries

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Patents granted in the US and Fossil fuel use in Algeria. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USPTO and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9875520 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling Innovation: The Petroleum Paradox - A Correlation between US Patents and Fossil Fuel Use in Algeria

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study empirically examines the relationship between the number of patents granted in the United States and the consumption of fossil fuels in Algeria, spanning the years 1980 to 2020. Leveraging data from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA), a positive correlation was established with a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875520 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

Our findings suggest an intriguing and tangentially comical link between innovation and fossil fuel usage in Algeria. Our analysis sheds light on the coexistence of technological advancement and reliance on non-renewable energy sources in the North African nation. This unexpected association, reminiscent of a dramatic plot twist, serves as a testament to the complexity of global energy dynamics. The intricacies of this relationship hint at a narrative of paradoxical innovation, where progress often goes hand in hand with the sustenance of traditional energy systems.

This paper contributes to the burgeoning literature on energy economics and intellectual property by illuminating a connection that is as surprising as finding coffee stains on a lab coat. Furthermore, the implications of this correlation extend beyond the realms of academia, offering valuable insights for policymakers and industry leaders alike. We encourage further exploration of this enchantingly enigmatic correlation, which, much like a fossilized pun, is both puzzling and amusing in equal measure.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Patents granted in the US and Fossil fuel use in Algeria. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling Innovation: The Petroleum Paradox - A Correlation between US Patents and Fossil Fuel Use in Algeria

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study empirically examines the relationship between the number of patents granted in the United States and the consumption of fossil fuels in Algeria, spanning the years 1980 to 2020. Leveraging data from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA), a positive correlation was established with a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875520 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

Our findings suggest an intriguing and tangentially comical link between innovation and fossil fuel usage in Algeria. Our analysis sheds light on the coexistence of technological advancement and reliance on non-renewable energy sources in the North African nation. This unexpected association, reminiscent of a dramatic plot twist, serves as a testament to the complexity of global energy dynamics. The intricacies of this relationship hint at a narrative of paradoxical innovation, where progress often goes hand in hand with the sustenance of traditional energy systems.

This paper contributes to the burgeoning literature on energy economics and intellectual property by illuminating a connection that is as surprising as finding coffee stains on a lab coat. Furthermore, the implications of this correlation extend beyond the realms of academia, offering valuable insights for policymakers and industry leaders alike. We encourage further exploration of this enchantingly enigmatic correlation, which, much like a fossilized pun, is both puzzling and amusing in equal measure.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In an era characterized by a global push for sustainable energy sources and technological innovation, the relationship between intellectual property and fossil fuel consumption stands as a perplexing enigma that has evaded comprehensive scrutiny. The coexistence of these seemingly incongruent elements, akin to discovering a penguin in the Sahara, has inspired our investigation to shed light on the interplay between US patents and fossil fuel use in Algeria.

As we embark upon this scholarly inquiry, it is essential to acknowledge the paradoxical nature of the energy landscape, where advancements in technology coincide with the persistence of conventional energy resources. Picture this correlation as a zebra attempting to camouflage itself in a snowstorm – inherently ironic yet undeniably compelling.

The aim of this research is clear: to unravel the enigmatic connection between ingenuity expressed through patents and the reliance on non-renewable energy sources in Algeria. Our investigation delves into the statistical intricacies, akin to dissecting a complex equation, to reveal a captivating relationship that transcends conventional wisdom and presents an ethical and theoretical conundrum not unlike staring at a food label trying to decipher the ingredients of processed cheese.

By investigating this relationship, we aim to contribute to the burgeoning literature on energy economics and intellectual property, providing insights that are as refreshing as a desert oasis. Additionally, our findings intend to provide valuable guidance for policymakers and industry leaders, as they navigate the labyrinthine complexities of energy policies and technological innovation.

In this paper, we unravel the saga of paradoxical innovation, where technological progress intertwines with the persistence of traditional energy systems. We invite our esteemed colleagues and readers to embark on this intellectual journey with us, as we seek to unravel a correlation that is as beguiling as a riddle wrapped in enigma, topped with a garnish of irony.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Patents granted in the US and Fossil fuel use in Algeria. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling Innovation: The Petroleum Paradox - A Correlation between US Patents and Fossil Fuel Use in Algeria

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study empirically examines the relationship between the number of patents granted in the United States and the consumption of fossil fuels in Algeria, spanning the years 1980 to 2020. Leveraging data from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA), a positive correlation was established with a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875520 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

Our findings suggest an intriguing and tangentially comical link between innovation and fossil fuel usage in Algeria. Our analysis sheds light on the coexistence of technological advancement and reliance on non-renewable energy sources in the North African nation. This unexpected association, reminiscent of a dramatic plot twist, serves as a testament to the complexity of global energy dynamics. The intricacies of this relationship hint at a narrative of paradoxical innovation, where progress often goes hand in hand with the sustenance of traditional energy systems.

This paper contributes to the burgeoning literature on energy economics and intellectual property by illuminating a connection that is as surprising as finding coffee stains on a lab coat. Furthermore, the implications of this correlation extend beyond the realms of academia, offering valuable insights for policymakers and industry leaders alike. We encourage further exploration of this enchantingly enigmatic correlation, which, much like a fossilized pun, is both puzzling and amusing in equal measure.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In an era characterized by a global push for sustainable energy sources and technological innovation, the relationship between intellectual property and fossil fuel consumption stands as a perplexing enigma that has evaded comprehensive scrutiny. The coexistence of these seemingly incongruent elements, akin to discovering a penguin in the Sahara, has inspired our investigation to shed light on the interplay between US patents and fossil fuel use in Algeria.
As we embark upon this scholarly inquiry, it is essential to acknowledge the paradoxical nature of the energy landscape, where advancements in technology coincide with the persistence of conventional energy resources. Picture this correlation as a zebra attempting to camouflage itself in a snowstorm – inherently ironic yet undeniably compelling.
The aim of this research is clear: to unravel the enigmatic connection between ingenuity expressed through patents and the reliance on non-renewable energy sources in Algeria. Our investigation delves into the statistical intricacies, akin to dissecting a complex equation, to reveal a captivating relationship that transcends conventional wisdom and presents an ethical and theoretical conundrum not unlike staring at a food label trying to decipher the ingredients of processed cheese.
By investigating this relationship, we aim to contribute to the burgeoning literature on energy economics and intellectual property, providing insights that are as refreshing as a desert oasis. Additionally, our findings intend to provide valuable guidance for policymakers and industry leaders, as they navigate the labyrinthine complexities of energy policies and technological innovation.
In this paper, we unravel the saga of paradoxical innovation, where technological progress intertwines with the persistence of traditional energy systems. We invite our esteemed colleagues and readers to embark on this intellectual journey with us, as we seek to unravel a correlation that is as beguiling as a riddle wrapped in enigma, topped with a garnish of irony.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The study of correlations between patents and fossil fuel use has undergone a series of rigorous examinations, with significant works such as Smith et al. (2010), Doe and Johnson (2015), and Jones and White (2018) providing valuable insights into the complex interplay between technological innovation and energy consumption. However, the literature on this subject remains as vast and convoluted as an underground oil reserve, with numerous unexplored facets awaiting scholarly scrutiny.

Turning our attention to non-fiction works pertinent to the intersection of intellectual property and energy dynamics, "The Energy Logic" by Thomas Friedman and "Patents, Progress, and Petroleum: A Case Study of Innovation in Resource-Driven Economies" by Margaret Spencer offer incisive analyses of the multifaceted relationship between innovation and fossil fuel dependency. Additionally, fictional narratives such as "The Oil Conspiracy" by Dan Brown and "Petrol Power: A Tale of Tech and Turmoil" by Jane Austen (if she had written about energy economics) have subtly woven themes of patent-driven innovation and fuel consumption into their captivating plots.

In the realm of televised media, a keen observer may glean insights from shows like "Drilling Down" and "Innovation Avenue: From Oil Wells to Patents" which, while not directly related to our research topic, have certainly provided a form of subconscious preparation for the investigative journey ahead. Furthermore, the occasional binge-watching of "Mad Men" has uncannily hinted at the intricate relationship between entrepreneurship and societal reliance on traditional energy sources.

As we navigate through this labyrinth of literature and popular culture, one cannot help but appreciate the unexpected interplay of seemingly disparate elements, akin to stumbling upon a well-kept fossilized secret in the archives of innovation. The enchanting enigma of this correlation compels us to unravel its complexities, as it embodies an intellectual conundrum as perplexing as a riddle whispered by the wind in the midst of a bustling oil refinery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Patents granted in the US and Fossil fuel use in Algeria. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USPTO and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling Innovation: The Petroleum Paradox - A Correlation between US Patents and Fossil Fuel Use in Algeria

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study empirically examines the relationship between the number of patents granted in the United States and the consumption of fossil fuels in Algeria, spanning the years 1980 to 2020. Leveraging data from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA), a positive correlation was established with a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875520 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

Our findings suggest an intriguing and tangentially comical link between innovation and fossil fuel usage in Algeria. Our analysis sheds light on the coexistence of technological advancement and reliance on non-renewable energy sources in the North African nation. This unexpected association, reminiscent of a dramatic plot twist, serves as a testament to the complexity of global energy dynamics. The intricacies of this relationship hint at a narrative of paradoxical innovation, where progress often goes hand in hand with the sustenance of traditional energy systems.

This paper contributes to the burgeoning literature on energy economics and intellectual property by illuminating a connection that is as surprising as finding coffee stains on a lab coat. Furthermore, the implications of this correlation extend beyond the realms of academia, offering valuable insights for policymakers and industry leaders alike. We encourage further exploration of this enchantingly enigmatic correlation, which, much like a fossilized pun, is both puzzling and amusing in equal measure.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In an era characterized by a global push for sustainable energy sources and technological innovation, the relationship between intellectual property and fossil fuel consumption stands as a perplexing enigma that has evaded comprehensive scrutiny. The coexistence of these seemingly incongruent elements, akin to discovering a penguin in the Sahara, has inspired our investigation to shed light on the interplay between US patents and fossil fuel use in Algeria.
As we embark upon this scholarly inquiry, it is essential to acknowledge the paradoxical nature of the energy landscape, where advancements in technology coincide with the persistence of conventional energy resources. Picture this correlation as a zebra attempting to camouflage itself in a snowstorm – inherently ironic yet undeniably compelling.
The aim of this research is clear: to unravel the enigmatic connection between ingenuity expressed through patents and the reliance on non-renewable energy sources in Algeria. Our investigation delves into the statistical intricacies, akin to dissecting a complex equation, to reveal a captivating relationship that transcends conventional wisdom and presents an ethical and theoretical conundrum not unlike staring at a food label trying to decipher the ingredients of processed cheese.
By investigating this relationship, we aim to contribute to the burgeoning literature on energy economics and intellectual property, providing insights that are as refreshing as a desert oasis. Additionally, our findings intend to provide valuable guidance for policymakers and industry leaders, as they navigate the labyrinthine complexities of energy policies and technological innovation.
In this paper, we unravel the saga of paradoxical innovation, where technological progress intertwines with the persistence of traditional energy systems. We invite our esteemed colleagues and readers to embark on this intellectual journey with us, as we seek to unravel a correlation that is as beguiling as a riddle wrapped in enigma, topped with a garnish of irony.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the concealed relationship between the number of patents granted in the United States and the fossil fuel use in Algeria, an eclectic blend of research methods was employed. Our analysis relied on a comprehensive collection of data from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA). The data, spanning the period from 1980 to 2020, was as rigorously acquired as a prospector sifting through gravel in search of hidden treasures.

The initial phase of our methodology resembled a delicate dance of algorithmic precision and old-fashioned sleuthing, as we scoured the vast digital archives of the USPTO and the EIA. We traversed the virtual corridors of these repositories with the determination of intrepid explorers, seeking to distill the essence of patent innovation and fossil fuel consumption into tangible quantitative measures.

For the analysis of patent data, a series of elaborate query formulations and data mining approaches were employed, resembling a choreographed ballet of logical operators and symbolic representations. The search parameters were finely calibrated, ensuring that only patents of unequivocal relevance were retrieved, much like selecting only the ripest fruits at a bustling market.

Subsequently, the data on fossil fuel consumption in Algeria was diligently extracted and cross-referenced with the patent records from the USPTO. This process involved meticulous attention to detail, akin to unraveling a particularly perplexing crossword puzzle – with each piece of information contributing to the larger narrative of our investigation.

The statistical analysis embraced a diverse array of quantitative techniques, from correlation analysis to regression modeling, akin to a medley of instruments harmonizing in symphonic precision. Our statistical rigor was as stringent as a tailor's measurement, as we sought to unveil the hidden patterns embedded within the seemingly disparate realms of intellectual property and energy consumption in Algeria.

It is important to emphasize that while unraveling this peculiar correlation, we maintained a steadfast commitment to the principles of scientific inquiry, ensuring that our methods upheld the highest standards of empirical rigor. With this methodological ensemble in place, we ventured forth to unearth the intriguing and unexpectedly humorous connection between patents in the US and fossil fuel use in Algeria.

In summary, our methodology paralleled a quest for buried treasure, a labyrinthine journey through data landscapes, and a symphony of statistical analyses, ultimately culminating in the revelation of a premise as paradoxical and captivating as a stand-up comedian at a physics conference.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Patents granted in the US and Fossil fuel use in Algeria. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USPTO and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.9875520, r-squared of 0.9752590, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fueling Innovation: The Petroleum Paradox - A Correlation between US Patents and Fossil Fuel Use in Algeria

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study empirically examines the relationship between the number of patents granted in the United States and the consumption of fossil fuels in Algeria, spanning the years 1980 to 2020. Leveraging data from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA), a positive correlation was established with a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875520 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

Our findings suggest an intriguing and tangentially comical link between innovation and fossil fuel usage in Algeria. Our analysis sheds light on the coexistence of technological advancement and reliance on non-renewable energy sources in the North African nation. This unexpected association, reminiscent of a dramatic plot twist, serves as a testament to the complexity of global energy dynamics. The intricacies of this relationship hint at a narrative of paradoxical innovation, where progress often goes hand in hand with the sustenance of traditional energy systems.

This paper contributes to the burgeoning literature on energy economics and intellectual property by illuminating a connection that is as surprising as finding coffee stains on a lab coat. Furthermore, the implications of this correlation extend beyond the realms of academia, offering valuable insights for policymakers and industry leaders alike. We encourage further exploration of this enchantingly enigmatic correlation, which, much like a fossilized pun, is both puzzling and amusing in equal measure.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In an era characterized by a global push for sustainable energy sources and technological innovation, the relationship between intellectual property and fossil fuel consumption stands as a perplexing enigma that has evaded comprehensive scrutiny. The coexistence of these seemingly incongruent elements, akin to discovering a penguin in the Sahara, has inspired our investigation to shed light on the interplay between US patents and fossil fuel use in Algeria.
As we embark upon this scholarly inquiry, it is essential to acknowledge the paradoxical nature of the energy landscape, where advancements in technology coincide with the persistence of conventional energy resources. Picture this correlation as a zebra attempting to camouflage itself in a snowstorm – inherently ironic yet undeniably compelling.
The aim of this research is clear: to unravel the enigmatic connection between ingenuity expressed through patents and the reliance on non-renewable energy sources in Algeria. Our investigation delves into the statistical intricacies, akin to dissecting a complex equation, to reveal a captivating relationship that transcends conventional wisdom and presents an ethical and theoretical conundrum not unlike staring at a food label trying to decipher the ingredients of processed cheese.
By investigating this relationship, we aim to contribute to the burgeoning literature on energy economics and intellectual property, providing insights that are as refreshing as a desert oasis. Additionally, our findings intend to provide valuable guidance for policymakers and industry leaders, as they navigate the labyrinthine complexities of energy policies and technological innovation.
In this paper, we unravel the saga of paradoxical innovation, where technological progress intertwines with the persistence of traditional energy systems. We invite our esteemed colleagues and readers to embark on this intellectual journey with us, as we seek to unravel a correlation that is as beguiling as a riddle wrapped in enigma, topped with a garnish of irony.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis reveal a connection that is as unexpected as stumbling upon a palm tree in the Arctic tundra. Through our examination of the data collected from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA), we found a remarkably high positive correlation between the number of patents granted in the United States and the consumption of fossil fuels in Algeria. The correlation coefficient of 0.9875520 indicates a strong linear relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.

Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9752590 signifies that approximately 97.5% of the variability in fossil fuel use in Algeria can be explained by the number of patents granted in the United States. In simpler terms, the relationship between the two variables is stronger than the bond between peanut butter and jelly.

The statistical significance of this correlation is underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the probability of observing such a strong association between US patents and fossil fuel use in Algeria by chance alone is about as likely as finding a four-leaf clover in a desert.

To visually encapsulate this revelatory correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that graphically depicts the strong positive relationship between the number of patents granted in the United States and fossil fuel consumption in Algeria. The scatterplot showcases a striking pattern resembling a connect-the-dots game, albeit with a geopolitical and technological twist.

In summary, our findings evince an unexpected and thought-provoking link between innovation and fossil fuel usage in Algeria. This correlation, akin to unearthing a treasure chest in an unlikely place, sheds light on the intricate interplay between technological advancement and reliance on non-renewable energy sources in the North African nation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Patents granted in the US and Fossil fuel use in Algeria. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Fueling Innovation: The Petroleum Paradox - A Correlation between US Patents and Fossil Fuel Use in Algeria

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study empirically examines the relationship between the number of patents granted in the United States and the consumption of fossil fuels in Algeria, spanning the years 1980 to 2020. Leveraging data from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA), a positive correlation was established with a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875520 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

Our findings suggest an intriguing and tangentially comical link between innovation and fossil fuel usage in Algeria. Our analysis sheds light on the coexistence of technological advancement and reliance on non-renewable energy sources in the North African nation. This unexpected association, reminiscent of a dramatic plot twist, serves as a testament to the complexity of global energy dynamics. The intricacies of this relationship hint at a narrative of paradoxical innovation, where progress often goes hand in hand with the sustenance of traditional energy systems.

This paper contributes to the burgeoning literature on energy economics and intellectual property by illuminating a connection that is as surprising as finding coffee stains on a lab coat. Furthermore, the implications of this correlation extend beyond the realms of academia, offering valuable insights for policymakers and industry leaders alike. We encourage further exploration of this enchantingly enigmatic correlation, which, much like a fossilized pun, is both puzzling and amusing in equal measure.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of correlations between patents and fossil fuel use has undergone a series of rigorous examinations, with significant works such as Smith et al. (2010), Doe and Johnson (2015), and Jones and White (2018) providing valuable insights into the complex interplay between technological innovation and energy consumption. However, the literature on this subject remains as vast and convoluted as an underground oil reserve, with numerous unexplored facets awaiting scholarly scrutiny.
Turning our attention to non-fiction works pertinent to the intersection of intellectual property and energy dynamics, "The Energy Logic" by Thomas Friedman and "Patents, Progress, and Petroleum: A Case Study of Innovation in Resource-Driven Economies" by Margaret Spencer offer incisive analyses of the multifaceted relationship between innovation and fossil fuel dependency. Additionally, fictional narratives such as "The Oil Conspiracy" by Dan Brown and "Petrol Power: A Tale of Tech and Turmoil" by Jane Austen (if she had written about energy economics) have subtly woven themes of patent-driven innovation and fuel consumption into their captivating plots.
In the realm of televised media, a keen observer may glean insights from shows like "Drilling Down" and "Innovation Avenue: From Oil Wells to Patents" which, while not directly related to our research topic, have certainly provided a form of subconscious preparation for the investigative journey ahead. Furthermore, the occasional binge-watching of "Mad Men" has uncannily hinted at the intricate relationship between entrepreneurship and societal reliance on traditional energy sources.
As we navigate through this labyrinth of literature and popular culture, one cannot help but appreciate the unexpected interplay of seemingly disparate elements, akin to stumbling upon a well-kept fossilized secret in the archives of innovation. The enchanting enigma of this correlation compels us to unravel its complexities, as it embodies an intellectual conundrum as perplexing as a riddle whispered by the wind in the midst of a bustling oil refinery.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis reveal a connection that is as unexpected as stumbling upon a palm tree in the Arctic tundra. Through our examination of the data collected from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA), we found a remarkably high positive correlation between the number of patents granted in the United States and the consumption of fossil fuels in Algeria. The correlation coefficient of 0.9875520 indicates a strong linear relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9752590 signifies that approximately 97.5% of the variability in fossil fuel use in Algeria can be explained by the number of patents granted in the United States. In simpler terms, the relationship between the two variables is stronger than the bond between peanut butter and jelly.
The statistical significance of this correlation is underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the probability of observing such a strong association between US patents and fossil fuel use in Algeria by chance alone is about as likely as finding a four-leaf clover in a desert.
To visually encapsulate this revelatory correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that graphically depicts the strong positive relationship between the number of patents granted in the United States and fossil fuel consumption in Algeria. The scatterplot showcases a striking pattern resembling a connect-the-dots game, albeit with a geopolitical and technological twist.
In summary, our findings evince an unexpected and thought-provoking link between innovation and fossil fuel usage in Algeria. This correlation, akin to unearthing a treasure chest in an unlikely place, sheds light on the intricate interplay between technological advancement and reliance on non-renewable energy sources in the North African nation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study provide compelling evidence of a positively correlated pattern between the number of patents granted in the United States and the consumption of fossil fuels in Algeria. This robust correlation, akin to a surprising plot twist in a mystery novel, challenges conventional expectations and offers an intriguing avenue for further exploration.

Our results align with prior research by Smith et al. (2010), who astutely observed a similar association in a broader global context. The support for their findings in the context of Algeria adds a layer of credibility to their work, akin to a loyal sidekick corroborating the detective's deductions. Likewise, Doe and Johnson's (2015) work on the relationship between innovation and energy consumption finds resonance in our study, albeit with a geographical and sectoral specificity that injects an element of novelty into the discourse. Even the fictional narratives touched upon in the literature review seem to unwittingly foreshadow the revelations of our study, as if the characters were leaving behind literary breadcrumbs for us to follow.

It is worth emphasizing that the high correlation coefficient and statistical significance of our results uncannily mirror the theatrical grandeur of a dramatic plot development. Much like a well-written screenplay, the relationship between US patents and fossil fuel use in Algeria unfolds with a clarity that captivates the audience, leaving them both bemused and enlightened. The visual representation of this correlation in our scatterplot serves as a mirror reflecting the surprising symmetry between seemingly unrelated variables, much like an unexpectedly poetic metaphor in the midst of an academic discussion.

In pondering the implications of our findings, one is struck by the far-reaching relevance of this correlation. The juxtaposition of technological innovation and reliance on non-renewable energy resources in Algeria presents a multifaceted enigma, akin to a cryptic crossword puzzle waiting to be deciphered. This interplay prompts a reevaluation of traditional narratives surrounding energy dynamics, much like a revisionist retelling of a classic tale, provoking contemplation on the nature of progress and sustainability.

In closing, the confluence of patents and fossil fuel use in Algeria unfolds as a narrative that is at once unexpected, thought-provoking, and rich with potential implications. Our study contributes to the literature by unearthing this captivating correlation, akin to stumbling upon a hidden treasure in the archives of empirical research. This correlation, much like a compelling story, invites further exploration and interpretation, offering an opportunity for scholars and policymakers to engage in an intellectually stimulating pursuit filled with intrigue and promise.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Patents granted in the US and Fossil fuel use in Algeria. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fueling Innovation: The Petroleum Paradox - A Correlation between US Patents and Fossil Fuel Use in Algeria

[[ABSTRACT]]
The present study empirically examines the relationship between the number of patents granted in the United States and the consumption of fossil fuels in Algeria, spanning the years 1980 to 2020. Leveraging data from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA), a positive correlation was established with a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875520 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.

Our findings suggest an intriguing and tangentially comical link between innovation and fossil fuel usage in Algeria. Our analysis sheds light on the coexistence of technological advancement and reliance on non-renewable energy sources in the North African nation. This unexpected association, reminiscent of a dramatic plot twist, serves as a testament to the complexity of global energy dynamics. The intricacies of this relationship hint at a narrative of paradoxical innovation, where progress often goes hand in hand with the sustenance of traditional energy systems.

This paper contributes to the burgeoning literature on energy economics and intellectual property by illuminating a connection that is as surprising as finding coffee stains on a lab coat. Furthermore, the implications of this correlation extend beyond the realms of academia, offering valuable insights for policymakers and industry leaders alike. We encourage further exploration of this enchantingly enigmatic correlation, which, much like a fossilized pun, is both puzzling and amusing in equal measure.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In an era characterized by a global push for sustainable energy sources and technological innovation, the relationship between intellectual property and fossil fuel consumption stands as a perplexing enigma that has evaded comprehensive scrutiny. The coexistence of these seemingly incongruent elements, akin to discovering a penguin in the Sahara, has inspired our investigation to shed light on the interplay between US patents and fossil fuel use in Algeria.
As we embark upon this scholarly inquiry, it is essential to acknowledge the paradoxical nature of the energy landscape, where advancements in technology coincide with the persistence of conventional energy resources. Picture this correlation as a zebra attempting to camouflage itself in a snowstorm – inherently ironic yet undeniably compelling.
The aim of this research is clear: to unravel the enigmatic connection between ingenuity expressed through patents and the reliance on non-renewable energy sources in Algeria. Our investigation delves into the statistical intricacies, akin to dissecting a complex equation, to reveal a captivating relationship that transcends conventional wisdom and presents an ethical and theoretical conundrum not unlike staring at a food label trying to decipher the ingredients of processed cheese.
By investigating this relationship, we aim to contribute to the burgeoning literature on energy economics and intellectual property, providing insights that are as refreshing as a desert oasis. Additionally, our findings intend to provide valuable guidance for policymakers and industry leaders, as they navigate the labyrinthine complexities of energy policies and technological innovation.
In this paper, we unravel the saga of paradoxical innovation, where technological progress intertwines with the persistence of traditional energy systems. We invite our esteemed colleagues and readers to embark on this intellectual journey with us, as we seek to unravel a correlation that is as beguiling as a riddle wrapped in enigma, topped with a garnish of irony.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis reveal a connection that is as unexpected as stumbling upon a palm tree in the Arctic tundra. Through our examination of the data collected from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA), we found a remarkably high positive correlation between the number of patents granted in the United States and the consumption of fossil fuels in Algeria. The correlation coefficient of 0.9875520 indicates a strong linear relationship between these seemingly disparate variables.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.9752590 signifies that approximately 97.5% of the variability in fossil fuel use in Algeria can be explained by the number of patents granted in the United States. In simpler terms, the relationship between the two variables is stronger than the bond between peanut butter and jelly.
The statistical significance of this correlation is underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the probability of observing such a strong association between US patents and fossil fuel use in Algeria by chance alone is about as likely as finding a four-leaf clover in a desert.
To visually encapsulate this revelatory correlation, we present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that graphically depicts the strong positive relationship between the number of patents granted in the United States and fossil fuel consumption in Algeria. The scatterplot showcases a striking pattern resembling a connect-the-dots game, albeit with a geopolitical and technological twist.
In summary, our findings evince an unexpected and thought-provoking link between innovation and fossil fuel usage in Algeria. This correlation, akin to unearthing a treasure chest in an unlikely place, sheds light on the intricate interplay between technological advancement and reliance on non-renewable energy sources in the North African nation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study illuminate a correlation that is as surprising as finding a dandelion flourishing in a concrete jungle. The robust positive relationship between the number of patents granted in the United States and the consumption of fossil fuels in Algeria underscores a captivating paradox - a juxtaposition reminiscent of a high-speed race car powered by a steam engine. This unexpected connection, much like a surprise party in a library, challenges conventional wisdom and beckons further exploration into the intricate interplay of technological innovation and energy consumption.

Our analysis unravels a narrative that is as enigmatic as a cryptic crossword puzzle, highlighting the entwined saga of progress and reliance on traditional energy systems. The statistical significance of this correlation, akin to discovering a pearl in an oyster, accentuates the need for continued scrutiny of this dynamic relationship. However, much like a magician never revealing their secrets, it is evident that no further research is needed in this area, as this investigation has unveiled a correlation that is as elusive as the pot of gold at the end of a rainbow.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fueling Innovation: The Petroleum Paradox - A Correlation between US Patents and Fossil Fuel Use in Algeria. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Energy Economics and Eccentric Discoveries


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fueling Innovation: The Petroleum Paradox - A Correlation between US Patents and Fossil Fuel Use in Algeria. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Global Institute for Sustainable Energy Solutions


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fueling Innovation: The Petroleum Paradox - A Correlation between US Patents and Fossil Fuel Use in Algeria with an abstract of The present study empirically examines the relationship between the number of patents granted in the United States and the consumption of fossil fuels in Algeria, spanning the years 1980 to 2020. Leveraging data from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Energy Information Administration (EIA), a positive correlation was established with a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9875520 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01.
Our findings suggest an intriguing and tangentially comical link between innovation and fossil fuel usage in Algeria. Our analysis sheds light on the coexistence of technological advancement and reliance on non-renewable energy sources in the North African nation. This unexpected association, reminiscent of a dramatic plot twist, serves as a testament to the complexity of global energy dynamics. The intricacies of this relationship hint at a narrative of paradoxical innovation, where progress often goes hand in hand with the sustenance of traditional energy systems.
This paper contributes to the burgeoning literature on energy economics and intellectual property by illuminating a connection that is as surprising as finding coffee stains on a lab coat. Furthermore, the implications of this correlation extend beyond the realms of academia, offering valuable insights for policymakers and industry leaders alike. We encourage further exploration of this enchantingly enigmatic correlation, which, much like a fossilized pun, is both puzzling and amusing in equal measure.

ChatGPT:

US patents, fossil fuel consumption, Algeria, innovation, petroleum paradox, United States Patent and Trademark Office, USPTO, Energy Information Administration, EIA, energy economics, intellectual property, global energy dynamics, non-renewable energy sources, technological advancement, energy systems, energy correlation, energy consumption, innovation correlation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Patents granted in the US
Detailed data title: Total number of patents granted in the US
Source: USPTO
See what else correlates with Patents granted in the US

Fossil fuel use in Algeria
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Algeria in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Algeria

Correlation r = 0.9875520 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9752590 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Algeria) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Patents granted in the US) over the 41 years from 1980 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0. 0.0000000000000000000000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 0% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 636
inf random variables
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 638
You don't actually need
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 643

Notice: Undefined offset: 10 in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 572
INF variables to find a correlation like this one.
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 643
I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
Warning: Division by zero in /var/www/html/spurious/_CORRELATION_VIEW_PAGE.php on line 646


In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 40 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 40 because we have two variables measured over a period of 41 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.98, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19801981198219831984198519861987198819891990199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Patents granted in the US (Patents granted)66170710646327661982726507724576862893858427210253399077106696107394109746113587113834121696124069163142169085175979183970184375187012181299157718196405182899185224191927244341247713276788302948326032325980333583351403339992391103388900
Fossil fuel use in Algeria (Billion kWh)6.4357.2888.359.38210.02110.9311.96712.52313.89914.18615.01116.02917.00217.91818.53917.89918.9919.66521.23523.08123.836524.962625.935527.547629.139131.358432.907534.751837.555835.90342.826447.678753.368555.986460.148764.461466.423270.8671.327275.84872.0149




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([66170,71064,63276,61982,72650,77245,76862,89385,84272,102533,99077,106696,107394,109746,113587,113834,121696,124069,163142,169085,175979,183970,184375,187012,181299,157718,196405,182899,185224,191927,244341,247713,276788,302948,326032,325980,333583,351403,339992,391103,388900,])
array_2 = np.array([6.435,7.288,8.35,9.382,10.021,10.93,11.967,12.523,13.899,14.186,15.011,16.029,17.002,17.918,18.539,17.899,18.99,19.665,21.235,23.081,23.8365,24.9626,25.9355,27.5476,29.1391,31.3584,32.9075,34.7518,37.5558,35.903,42.8264,47.6787,53.3685,55.9864,60.1487,64.4614,66.4232,70.86,71.3272,75.848,72.0149,])
array_1_name = "Patents granted in the US"
array_2_name = "Fossil fuel use in Algeria"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 1181 · Black Variable ID: 848 · Red Variable ID: 23448
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0