Report an error
Fossil fuel use in Algeria correlates with...
Variable | Correlation | Years | Has img? |
Popularity of the first name Ellie | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
Annual US household spending on healthcare | r=0.99 | 22yrs | No |
Patents granted in the US | r=0.99 | 41yrs | Yes! |
Google searches for 'ice bath' | r=0.99 | 18yrs | No |
Associates degrees awarded in Liberal arts | r=0.99 | 11yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Luciano | r=0.99 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Eden | r=0.98 | 42yrs | No |
Popularity of the first name Raphael | r=0.91 | 42yrs | No |
Fossil fuel use in Algeria also correlates with...
<< Back to discover a correlation
You caught me! While it would be intuitive to sort only by "correlation," I have a big, weird database. If I sort only by correlation, often all the top results are from some one or two very large datasets (like the weather or labor statistics), and it overwhelms the page.
I can't show you *all* the correlations, because my database would get too large and this page would take a very long time to load. Instead I opt to show you a subset, and I sort them by a magic system score. It starts with the correlation, but penalizes variables that repeat from the same dataset. (It also gives a bonus to variables I happen to find interesting.)