about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #1,126 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is North American digital comic sales volume and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As people delved into the complex storylines and interconnected universes of digital comics, they found themselves unable to escape the pull of mathematical relationships. The dramatic arcs and sudden plot twists in the world of comics left them yearning for a sense of order and connection, much like the longing for a correlation coefficient in their statistical endeavors. The sheer volume of data in digital comics mirrored the vast array of characters and subplots, leading enthusiasts to seek guidance on how to calculate correlations and unravel the intricate web of storytelling hidden within the numbers. In a world where even the most fantastical elements can be graphed and analyzed, perhaps the true superpower was the ability to find patterns and associations in this newfound realm of electronic graphic narratives. And thus, as digital comic sales soared, so too did the quest for understanding the statistical relationships that lay hidden in the panels of this brave new digital world.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Cybernetic art ] Generate an image of a futuristic bookstore brimming with energy. In the center, there's a towering stack of digital comic books titled "North American digital comic sales," emitting a vibrant glow amidst the bustling crowd. People are engrossed in browsing the digital comics, while a group is clustered around a mesmerizing holographic computer display. They are fervently typing "how to calculate a correlation" into the Google search bar, sparking an atmosphere of exhilarating discovery and discussion. Within this dynamic scene, there's an unmistakable sense of anticipation as the group delves into the correlation between the frequency of Batman saying "I'm Batman" and the number of adversaries he triumphs over. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: The increase in North American digital comic sales volume caused an increase in Google searches for "how to calculate a correlation" because people were trying to figure out if the number of times Batman says "I'm Batman" is correlated with the number of villains he defeats.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Glitch art Charcoal Cutsy art illustration Cybernetic art An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'
ChatGPT: Cybernetic art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. The increase in North American digital comic sales volume caused an increase in Google searches for "how to calculate a correlation" because people were trying to figure out if the number of times Batman says "I'm Batman" is correlated with the number of villains he defeats.
ChatGPT: In a lively bookstore, we see a stack of digital comic books labeled "North American digital comic sales." As people browse through the comics, we notice a group of individuals huddled around a computer, typing "how to calculate a correlation" into the Google search bar. The excitement in the air suggests that they are discussing the correlation between the number of times Batman says "I'm Batman" and the number of villains he defeats.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cybernetic art ] and depicting this scene: In a lively bookstore, we see a stack of digital comic books labeled "North American digital comic sales." As people browse through the comics, we notice a group of individuals huddled around a computer, typing "how to calculate a correlation" into the Google search bar. The excitement in the air suggests that they are discussing the correlation between the number of times Batman says "I'm Batman" and the number of villains he defeats. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Cybernetic art ] Generate an image of a futuristic bookstore brimming with energy. In the center, there's a towering stack of digital comic books titled "North American digital comic sales," emitting a vibrant glow amidst the bustling crowd. People are engrossed in browsing the digital comics, while a group is clustered around a mesmerizing holographic computer display. They are fervently typing "how to calculate a correlation" into the Google search bar, sparking an atmosphere of exhilarating discovery and discussion. Within this dynamic scene, there's an unmistakable sense of anticipation as the group delves into the correlation between the frequency of Batman saying "I'm Batman" and the number of adversaries he triumphs over.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in North American digital comic sales volume caused how to calculate a correlation (Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation') to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Panel Perplexities: Addressing the Correlation Conundrum Between North American Digital Comic Sales and Google Searches for 'How to Calculate a Correlation'

The Journal of Quirky Quantitative Quandaries

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between North American digital comic sales volume and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from ICV2 and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9688187 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Panel Perplexities: Addressing the Correlation Conundrum Between North American Digital Comic Sales and Google Searches for 'How to Calculate a Correlation'

[[ABSTRACT]]
Can you really compute a correlation coefficient between digital comic sales and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'? It may seem like a punchline to a statistical joke, but our research team dove headfirst into this whimsical web of data to uncover some surprising findings. Using data from ICV2 and Google Trends, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9688187 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2009 to 2021. Our study sheds light on the intriguing relationship between the popularity of digital comics and the perplexing curiosity about correlation calculations, making a splash in the world of statistical humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between North American digital comic sales volume and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Panel Perplexities: Addressing the Correlation Conundrum Between North American Digital Comic Sales and Google Searches for 'How to Calculate a Correlation'

[[ABSTRACT]]
Can you really compute a correlation coefficient between digital comic sales and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'? It may seem like a punchline to a statistical joke, but our research team dove headfirst into this whimsical web of data to uncover some surprising findings. Using data from ICV2 and Google Trends, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9688187 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2009 to 2021. Our study sheds light on the intriguing relationship between the popularity of digital comics and the perplexing curiosity about correlation calculations, making a splash in the world of statistical humor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As digital comics continue to captivate the imagination of readers across North America, a curious phenomenon has emerged in the digital realm - a surge of interest in the technical intricacies of correlation calculations. While the connection between comic sales and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation' might initially seem like a whimsical pairing more suited for a graphic novel plotline, our study set out to investigate the statistical intersection of these seemingly unrelated domains.

In the realm of digital commerce, the popularity of digital comics has soared in recent years, captivating audiences with colorful characters and captivating story arcs. Simultaneously, the digital landscape has seen an intriguing uptick in the number of individuals turning to Google in search of guidance on calculating correlation coefficients - a statistical measure used to quantify the relationship between two variables. This whimsical web of data piqued our interest, leading us to embark on a statistical adventure to explore the underlying correlation conundrum.

This research aims to address the correlation conundrum between North American digital comic sales and the curious phenomenon of individuals seeking enlightenment on how to calculate a correlation. While the surface-level connection elicits a chuckle, peeling back the layers of data reveals a statistically significant relationship that both intrigues and amuses. As we delve into the world of data analysis, our goal is to shed light on this unconventional correlation and provide a deeper understanding of the statistical dynamics at play. Our investigation offers a blend of statistical rigor and a dash of whimsy, aiming to bring a smile to the faces of both comic enthusiasts and data aficionados alike.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between North American digital comic sales volume and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Panel Perplexities: Addressing the Correlation Conundrum Between North American Digital Comic Sales and Google Searches for 'How to Calculate a Correlation'

[[ABSTRACT]]
Can you really compute a correlation coefficient between digital comic sales and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'? It may seem like a punchline to a statistical joke, but our research team dove headfirst into this whimsical web of data to uncover some surprising findings. Using data from ICV2 and Google Trends, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9688187 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2009 to 2021. Our study sheds light on the intriguing relationship between the popularity of digital comics and the perplexing curiosity about correlation calculations, making a splash in the world of statistical humor.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As digital comics continue to captivate the imagination of readers across North America, a curious phenomenon has emerged in the digital realm - a surge of interest in the technical intricacies of correlation calculations. While the connection between comic sales and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation' might initially seem like a whimsical pairing more suited for a graphic novel plotline, our study set out to investigate the statistical intersection of these seemingly unrelated domains.
In the realm of digital commerce, the popularity of digital comics has soared in recent years, captivating audiences with colorful characters and captivating story arcs. Simultaneously, the digital landscape has seen an intriguing uptick in the number of individuals turning to Google in search of guidance on calculating correlation coefficients - a statistical measure used to quantify the relationship between two variables. This whimsical web of data piqued our interest, leading us to embark on a statistical adventure to explore the underlying correlation conundrum.
This research aims to address the correlation conundrum between North American digital comic sales and the curious phenomenon of individuals seeking enlightenment on how to calculate a correlation. While the surface-level connection elicits a chuckle, peeling back the layers of data reveals a statistically significant relationship that both intrigues and amuses. As we delve into the world of data analysis, our goal is to shed light on this unconventional correlation and provide a deeper understanding of the statistical dynamics at play. Our investigation offers a blend of statistical rigor and a dash of whimsy, aiming to bring a smile to the faces of both comic enthusiasts and data aficionados alike.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

A myriad of scholarly works has delved into the enigmatic realm of correlation calculations and digital commerce, providing valuable insights into the peculiar intersection of statistics and pop culture. Smith and Doe (2015) elucidated the principles of correlation coefficients with precision and clarity, establishing a robust foundation for our investigation. Moreover, Jones et al. (2018) expounded upon the complexities of digital market trends, offering a nuanced understanding of the ebb and flow of the online marketplace.

On a lighter note, several non-fiction works have brought a touch of humor to the world of correlation calculations and digital phenomena. In "Statistics Made Cool" by Lorem (2012), the author skillfully interweaves statistical principles with quirky anecdotes, reminding readers that even correlation coefficients can have a humorous side. Similarly, Ipsum's (2016) "The Joy of Digital Comics: An Analytical Odyssey" invites readers on a whimsical journey through the world of digital comics, accompanied by the occasional statistical pun and tongue-in-cheek correlation anecdotes.

Turning to the realm of fiction, one cannot overlook the influence of literature that seemingly tiptoes into statistical territories. Titles such as "The Correlation Chronicles" by FictionalAuthor A. (2014) and "Digital Dilemmas: A Statistical Saga" by FictionalAuthor B. (2017) blur the lines between statistical rigor and imaginative storytelling, offering an entertaining blend of comic sales and correlation conundrums.

As for cinematic influences, the authors find themselves drawn to tangentially related movies that have sparked moments of statistical introspection. Films such as "The Matrix" and "Inception" may not overtly delve into the whimsical world of digital comics and correlation calculations, but they certainly inspire contemplation on the interconnectedness of data and reality, stirring a mirthful pondering of statistical quirks amidst digital landscapes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between North American digital comic sales volume and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from ICV2 and Google Trends . You used data from 2009 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Panel Perplexities: Addressing the Correlation Conundrum Between North American Digital Comic Sales and Google Searches for 'How to Calculate a Correlation'

[[ABSTRACT]]
Can you really compute a correlation coefficient between digital comic sales and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'? It may seem like a punchline to a statistical joke, but our research team dove headfirst into this whimsical web of data to uncover some surprising findings. Using data from ICV2 and Google Trends, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9688187 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2009 to 2021. Our study sheds light on the intriguing relationship between the popularity of digital comics and the perplexing curiosity about correlation calculations, making a splash in the world of statistical humor.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As digital comics continue to captivate the imagination of readers across North America, a curious phenomenon has emerged in the digital realm - a surge of interest in the technical intricacies of correlation calculations. While the connection between comic sales and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation' might initially seem like a whimsical pairing more suited for a graphic novel plotline, our study set out to investigate the statistical intersection of these seemingly unrelated domains.
In the realm of digital commerce, the popularity of digital comics has soared in recent years, captivating audiences with colorful characters and captivating story arcs. Simultaneously, the digital landscape has seen an intriguing uptick in the number of individuals turning to Google in search of guidance on calculating correlation coefficients - a statistical measure used to quantify the relationship between two variables. This whimsical web of data piqued our interest, leading us to embark on a statistical adventure to explore the underlying correlation conundrum.
This research aims to address the correlation conundrum between North American digital comic sales and the curious phenomenon of individuals seeking enlightenment on how to calculate a correlation. While the surface-level connection elicits a chuckle, peeling back the layers of data reveals a statistically significant relationship that both intrigues and amuses. As we delve into the world of data analysis, our goal is to shed light on this unconventional correlation and provide a deeper understanding of the statistical dynamics at play. Our investigation offers a blend of statistical rigor and a dash of whimsy, aiming to bring a smile to the faces of both comic enthusiasts and data aficionados alike.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To tackle the intricacies of the correlation conundrum between North American digital comic sales and the surge of Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation', we embarked on a whimsical research journey infused with statistical rigor. The data for this study was collected from a variety of sources, primarily ICV2 for digital comic sales volume and Google Trends for the search interest in 'how to calculate a correlation'. These sources provided a rich tapestry of information covering the period from 2009 to 2021 - a timeframe that allowed us to capture the evolving trends in both digital comic consumption and statistical curiosity.

The first step in our data odyssey involved the careful extraction and curation of digital comic sales figures from ICV2, known for its comprehensive coverage of the comic industry. With a keen eye for detail, we painstakingly compiled the monthly sales volumes for digital comics, capturing the ebb and flow of this vibrant market.

Simultaneously, we delved into the surreal seas of Google Trends to harvest the search interest data for 'how to calculate a correlation'. This unconventional pairing of digital comics and statistical inquiries led us to navigate through the virtual labyrinth of internet searches, spanning from the dawn of the digital comic era to the modern-day digital renaissance.

With data in tow, we embarked on the statistical analysis, employing robust techniques to unravel the correlation conundrum. The cornerstone of our analysis was the computation of the correlation coefficient, utilizing the stalwart tool of Pearson's correlation to quantify the relationship between the sales volume of digital comics and the surge in searches for correlation calculations. This rigorous statistical approach allowed us to uncover the unexpected synergy between these seemingly unrelated domains, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.9688187 and a p-value less than 0.01.

In the spirit of statistical merriment, we also explored some quirky auxiliary analyses, including time series modeling to track the temporal evolution of digital comic sales and the escalating curiosity in correlation computations. These analyses added a touch of whimsy to our statistical repertoire, infusing a dash of lightheartedness into the otherwise rigorous investigative process.

Oh, the joys of traversing the statistical landscape with digital comics and correlation calculations as our trusty companions! Our methodological escapade enriches not only the realm of statistical inquiry but also brings a playful spin to the world of digital comic analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between North American digital comic sales volume and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from ICV2 and Google Trends .

For the time period 2009 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9688187, r-squared of 0.9386096, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Panel Perplexities: Addressing the Correlation Conundrum Between North American Digital Comic Sales and Google Searches for 'How to Calculate a Correlation'

[[ABSTRACT]]
Can you really compute a correlation coefficient between digital comic sales and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'? It may seem like a punchline to a statistical joke, but our research team dove headfirst into this whimsical web of data to uncover some surprising findings. Using data from ICV2 and Google Trends, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9688187 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2009 to 2021. Our study sheds light on the intriguing relationship between the popularity of digital comics and the perplexing curiosity about correlation calculations, making a splash in the world of statistical humor.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As digital comics continue to captivate the imagination of readers across North America, a curious phenomenon has emerged in the digital realm - a surge of interest in the technical intricacies of correlation calculations. While the connection between comic sales and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation' might initially seem like a whimsical pairing more suited for a graphic novel plotline, our study set out to investigate the statistical intersection of these seemingly unrelated domains.
In the realm of digital commerce, the popularity of digital comics has soared in recent years, captivating audiences with colorful characters and captivating story arcs. Simultaneously, the digital landscape has seen an intriguing uptick in the number of individuals turning to Google in search of guidance on calculating correlation coefficients - a statistical measure used to quantify the relationship between two variables. This whimsical web of data piqued our interest, leading us to embark on a statistical adventure to explore the underlying correlation conundrum.
This research aims to address the correlation conundrum between North American digital comic sales and the curious phenomenon of individuals seeking enlightenment on how to calculate a correlation. While the surface-level connection elicits a chuckle, peeling back the layers of data reveals a statistically significant relationship that both intrigues and amuses. As we delve into the world of data analysis, our goal is to shed light on this unconventional correlation and provide a deeper understanding of the statistical dynamics at play. Our investigation offers a blend of statistical rigor and a dash of whimsy, aiming to bring a smile to the faces of both comic enthusiasts and data aficionados alike.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between North American digital comic sales volume and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation', with a correlation coefficient of 0.9688187 and an r-squared value of 0.9386096. This indicates that over 93% of the variability in digital comic sales volume can be explained by the variation in Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation' from 2009 to 2021. The p-value of less than 0.01 denotes a highly significant relationship between the two variables, confirming that this correlation is not merely a statistical coincidence. It seems that the fascination with digital comics and the perplexity surrounding correlation calculations have become intertwined in the digital landscape, creating a statistical saga worthy of its own comic series.

As depicted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually illustrates the strong positive relationship between digital comic sales volume and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'. Each data point on the plot appears to whisper a statistical tale of intrigue and amusement, highlighting the unexpected connection between these seemingly disparate subjects. This robust correlation provides empirical evidence that the whimsical nature of statistical exploration can lead to unexpected discoveries, much like stumbling upon a hidden subplot in a comic book.

The findings from this study not only underscore the statistical significance of the relationship between digital comic sales and the curious quest for correlation comprehension but also serve as a reminder that the world of data analysis is filled with surprising twists and turns. It appears that while individuals may be captivated by the storylines within digital comics, they are equally intrigued by the statistical storyline woven into the fabric of online searches. Our research contributes to the evolving narrative of statistical inquiry and digital culture, demonstrating that even the most unlikely pairings can yield meaningful insights when examined through a statistical lens.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between North American digital comic sales volume and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Panel Perplexities: Addressing the Correlation Conundrum Between North American Digital Comic Sales and Google Searches for 'How to Calculate a Correlation'

[[ABSTRACT]]
Can you really compute a correlation coefficient between digital comic sales and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'? It may seem like a punchline to a statistical joke, but our research team dove headfirst into this whimsical web of data to uncover some surprising findings. Using data from ICV2 and Google Trends, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9688187 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2009 to 2021. Our study sheds light on the intriguing relationship between the popularity of digital comics and the perplexing curiosity about correlation calculations, making a splash in the world of statistical humor.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
A myriad of scholarly works has delved into the enigmatic realm of correlation calculations and digital commerce, providing valuable insights into the peculiar intersection of statistics and pop culture. Smith and Doe (2015) elucidated the principles of correlation coefficients with precision and clarity, establishing a robust foundation for our investigation. Moreover, Jones et al. (2018) expounded upon the complexities of digital market trends, offering a nuanced understanding of the ebb and flow of the online marketplace.
On a lighter note, several non-fiction works have brought a touch of humor to the world of correlation calculations and digital phenomena. In "Statistics Made Cool" by Lorem (2012), the author skillfully interweaves statistical principles with quirky anecdotes, reminding readers that even correlation coefficients can have a humorous side. Similarly, Ipsum's (2016) "The Joy of Digital Comics: An Analytical Odyssey" invites readers on a whimsical journey through the world of digital comics, accompanied by the occasional statistical pun and tongue-in-cheek correlation anecdotes.
Turning to the realm of fiction, one cannot overlook the influence of literature that seemingly tiptoes into statistical territories. Titles such as "The Correlation Chronicles" by FictionalAuthor A. (2014) and "Digital Dilemmas: A Statistical Saga" by FictionalAuthor B. (2017) blur the lines between statistical rigor and imaginative storytelling, offering an entertaining blend of comic sales and correlation conundrums.
As for cinematic influences, the authors find themselves drawn to tangentially related movies that have sparked moments of statistical introspection. Films such as "The Matrix" and "Inception" may not overtly delve into the whimsical world of digital comics and correlation calculations, but they certainly inspire contemplation on the interconnectedness of data and reality, stirring a mirthful pondering of statistical quirks amidst digital landscapes.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between North American digital comic sales volume and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation', with a correlation coefficient of 0.9688187 and an r-squared value of 0.9386096. This indicates that over 93% of the variability in digital comic sales volume can be explained by the variation in Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation' from 2009 to 2021. The p-value of less than 0.01 denotes a highly significant relationship between the two variables, confirming that this correlation is not merely a statistical coincidence. It seems that the fascination with digital comics and the perplexity surrounding correlation calculations have become intertwined in the digital landscape, creating a statistical saga worthy of its own comic series.
As depicted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually illustrates the strong positive relationship between digital comic sales volume and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'. Each data point on the plot appears to whisper a statistical tale of intrigue and amusement, highlighting the unexpected connection between these seemingly disparate subjects. This robust correlation provides empirical evidence that the whimsical nature of statistical exploration can lead to unexpected discoveries, much like stumbling upon a hidden subplot in a comic book.
The findings from this study not only underscore the statistical significance of the relationship between digital comic sales and the curious quest for correlation comprehension but also serve as a reminder that the world of data analysis is filled with surprising twists and turns. It appears that while individuals may be captivated by the storylines within digital comics, they are equally intrigued by the statistical storyline woven into the fabric of online searches. Our research contributes to the evolving narrative of statistical inquiry and digital culture, demonstrating that even the most unlikely pairings can yield meaningful insights when examined through a statistical lens.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has brought to light a striking association between North American digital comic sales and the Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9688187 and a highly significant p-value of less than 0.01 reinforce the notion that the perplexity surrounding correlation calculations is intricately linked with the burgeoning interest in digital comics. This unexpected correlation unfurls like an exciting plot twist in a comic book, capturing the attention of both statisticians and pop culture enthusiasts alike.

In the context of prior research, the findings of our study align with the scholarly works that have previously explored the intricate interplay of statistics and digital commerce. The precision and clarity established by Smith and Doe (2015) in elucidating the principles of correlation coefficients provide a solid foundation for our investigation. Additionally, the nuanced understanding of digital market trends presented by Jones et al. (2018) resonates with our own delineation of the influential connection between digital comic sales and the quest for correlation comprehension.

On a lighter note, our study pays homage to the unconventional yet delightful approaches taken by non-fiction and fictional works in bridging the realms of statistics and pop culture. The statistical puns and tongue-in-cheek correlation anecdotes scattered throughout Lorem's (2012) "Statistics Made Cool" and the whimsical statistical storytelling in Ipsum's (2016) "The Joy of Digital Comics" seem to embody the very essence of our findings. It is as if the data itself is weaving a tale of statistical intrigue and amusement, where the unpredictability of statistical exploration mirrors the excitement of stumbling upon a hidden subplot in a comic book.

Our results not only substantiate the previously established statistical significance of the relationship between digital comic sales and the curiosity about correlation calculations but also serve as a testament to the unexpected twists and turns that can emerge in the world of statistical inquiry. It appears that the statistical storyline intertwined with the fabric of online searches has become an integral part of the evolving narrative of statistical exploration and digital culture.

In essence, our study sheds light on the profound connection between statistics and pop culture, demonstrating that even the most whimsical of statistical queries can unveil meaningful insights. As we continue to unravel the statistical saga of digital comics and correlation conundrums, it becomes apparent that statistical exploration is rich with intriguing plot twists, much like a gripping comic series.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between North American digital comic sales volume and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Panel Perplexities: Addressing the Correlation Conundrum Between North American Digital Comic Sales and Google Searches for 'How to Calculate a Correlation'

[[ABSTRACT]]
Can you really compute a correlation coefficient between digital comic sales and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'? It may seem like a punchline to a statistical joke, but our research team dove headfirst into this whimsical web of data to uncover some surprising findings. Using data from ICV2 and Google Trends, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9688187 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2009 to 2021. Our study sheds light on the intriguing relationship between the popularity of digital comics and the perplexing curiosity about correlation calculations, making a splash in the world of statistical humor.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As digital comics continue to captivate the imagination of readers across North America, a curious phenomenon has emerged in the digital realm - a surge of interest in the technical intricacies of correlation calculations. While the connection between comic sales and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation' might initially seem like a whimsical pairing more suited for a graphic novel plotline, our study set out to investigate the statistical intersection of these seemingly unrelated domains.
In the realm of digital commerce, the popularity of digital comics has soared in recent years, captivating audiences with colorful characters and captivating story arcs. Simultaneously, the digital landscape has seen an intriguing uptick in the number of individuals turning to Google in search of guidance on calculating correlation coefficients - a statistical measure used to quantify the relationship between two variables. This whimsical web of data piqued our interest, leading us to embark on a statistical adventure to explore the underlying correlation conundrum.
This research aims to address the correlation conundrum between North American digital comic sales and the curious phenomenon of individuals seeking enlightenment on how to calculate a correlation. While the surface-level connection elicits a chuckle, peeling back the layers of data reveals a statistically significant relationship that both intrigues and amuses. As we delve into the world of data analysis, our goal is to shed light on this unconventional correlation and provide a deeper understanding of the statistical dynamics at play. Our investigation offers a blend of statistical rigor and a dash of whimsy, aiming to bring a smile to the faces of both comic enthusiasts and data aficionados alike.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong correlation between North American digital comic sales volume and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation', with a correlation coefficient of 0.9688187 and an r-squared value of 0.9386096. This indicates that over 93% of the variability in digital comic sales volume can be explained by the variation in Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation' from 2009 to 2021. The p-value of less than 0.01 denotes a highly significant relationship between the two variables, confirming that this correlation is not merely a statistical coincidence. It seems that the fascination with digital comics and the perplexity surrounding correlation calculations have become intertwined in the digital landscape, creating a statistical saga worthy of its own comic series.
As depicted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually illustrates the strong positive relationship between digital comic sales volume and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'. Each data point on the plot appears to whisper a statistical tale of intrigue and amusement, highlighting the unexpected connection between these seemingly disparate subjects. This robust correlation provides empirical evidence that the whimsical nature of statistical exploration can lead to unexpected discoveries, much like stumbling upon a hidden subplot in a comic book.
The findings from this study not only underscore the statistical significance of the relationship between digital comic sales and the curious quest for correlation comprehension but also serve as a reminder that the world of data analysis is filled with surprising twists and turns. It appears that while individuals may be captivated by the storylines within digital comics, they are equally intrigued by the statistical storyline woven into the fabric of online searches. Our research contributes to the evolving narrative of statistical inquiry and digital culture, demonstrating that even the most unlikely pairings can yield meaningful insights when examined through a statistical lens.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has undoubtedly unraveled the enigmatic correlation between North American digital comic sales and the quest for understanding correlation calculations. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9688187 between these seemingly unrelated phenomena has left us marveling at the statistical serendipity that unfolds in the digital realm. It seems that as digital comics weave intricate narratives, so too do the statistical patterns lurking behind Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation', creating a comedic dance of data that would make even the most stoic statistician crack a smile.

Our findings not only provide empirical evidence of this unexpected relationship but also serve as a reminder that statistical exploration can lead to surprising revelations, much like stumbling upon an Easter egg in a digital comic. The statistically significant link between these disparate domains demonstrates that even in the world of data analysis, there is room for serendipitous marvel.

But fear not, fellow researchers, for our statistical odyssey has come to an end. Our study has shed light on the whimsical correlation between digital comic sales and the fascination with correlation calculations, illuminating a statistical spectacle that intertwines the art of storytelling and the science of data. With our findings in hand, there is no need for further exploration of this peculiar pairing. Trust us - in the realm of statistical comedy, this correlation is the punchline that cannot be topped. We jest, of course, but in the spirit of statistical inquiry and merriment, we leave this correlation conundrum for the next generation of intrepid researchers to ponder.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Panel Perplexities: Addressing the Correlation Conundrum Between North American Digital Comic Sales and Google Searches for 'How to Calculate a Correlation'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Quantitative Quandaries


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Panel Perplexities: Addressing the Correlation Conundrum Between North American Digital Comic Sales and Google Searches for 'How to Calculate a Correlation'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Digital Entertainment Research and Analytics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Panel Perplexities: Addressing the Correlation Conundrum Between North American Digital Comic Sales and Google Searches for 'How to Calculate a Correlation' with an abstract of Can you really compute a correlation coefficient between digital comic sales and Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'? It may seem like a punchline to a statistical joke, but our research team dove headfirst into this whimsical web of data to uncover some surprising findings. Using data from ICV2 and Google Trends, we uncovered a robust correlation coefficient of 0.9688187 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2009 to 2021. Our study sheds light on the intriguing relationship between the popularity of digital comics and the perplexing curiosity about correlation calculations, making a splash in the world of statistical humor.

ChatGPT:

Panel Perplexities, Digital Comic Sales, Google Searches, Correlation Conundrum, Correlation Coefficient, Statistical Joke, ICV2, Google Trends, Digital Comics, Curiosity, Statistical Humor

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

North American digital comic sales volume
Source: ICV2
See what else correlates with North American digital comic sales volume

Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'

Correlation r = 0.9688187 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9386096 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., North American digital comic sales volume) over the 13 years from 2009 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.2E-8. 0.0000000521834465408094950000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 5.2E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 19,163,165 random variables You don't actually need 19 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.9, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
North American digital comic sales volume (US Dollars)1000000800000025000000700000009000000010000000090000000900000009000000010000000090000000160000000170000000
Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation' (Rel. search volume)1524.916725.532.083334.58334039.7535.333337.583336.583340.166755.583353.25




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1000000,8000000,25000000,70000000,90000000,100000000,90000000,90000000,90000000,100000000,90000000,160000000,170000000,])
array_2 = np.array([15,24.9167,25.5,32.0833,34.5833,40,39.75,35.3333,37.5833,36.5833,40.1667,55.5833,53.25,])
array_1_name = "North American digital comic sales volume"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to calculate a correlation'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 1126 · Black Variable ID: 272 · Red Variable ID: 1457
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0