Download png, svg

AI explanation

^{Show image generation prompt} Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A scene from a Pixar movie ] Using the style of a Pixar movie, let's depict a group of professors in a classroom dealing with deteriorating air quality and struggling to breathe. The atmosphere is hazy and smoggy, with the professors feeling visibly fatigued and reaching for water bottles. Throughout the scene, small bags of peanuts are on the desks, symbolizing the struggle with reduced salaries and the phrase "working for peanuts." The visual should have clear expressions of hardship and weariness on the professors' faces, while still maintaining the whimsical and expressive style of a Pixar movie. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.

---

This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the situation described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here is a situation: Breaking news: it seems the decrease in good air quality in Grand Rapids, Michigan has had a surprising impact on Associate Professor salaries across the US. It turns out, as the air quality worsened, professors were left gasping for breath, leading to decreased productivity and ultimately reduced salaries. Sources speculate that the phrase "working for peanuts" has taken on a whole new meaning as professors struggle to keep their heads above the smog.. Given that situation, which of the following image descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand and the tone of the explanation. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie inspired by bauhaus Art nouveau Celtic art Sci-fi fantacy
ChatGPT: A scene from a Pixar movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated and the explanation described. Do not reference graphs or charts; describe physical objects.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that depicts the following situation. Keep the description simple. Breaking news: it seems the decrease in good air quality in Grand Rapids, Michigan has had a surprising impact on Associate Professor salaries across the US. It turns out, as the air quality worsened, professors were left gasping for breath, leading to decreased productivity and ultimately reduced salaries. Sources speculate that the phrase "working for peanuts" has taken on a whole new meaning as professors struggle to keep their heads above the smog.
ChatGPT: Imagine a scene of a group of professors in a classroom, looking visibly tired and struggling to breathe as the air quality deteriorates around them. The atmosphere is hazy and smoggy, with the professors feeling fatigued and reaching for water bottles in an attempt to catch their breath. In the midst of this, there are small bags of peanuts placed on the desks, symbolizing the struggle with reduced salaries and the phrase "working for peanuts."

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from a Pixar movie ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a scene of a group of professors in a classroom, looking visibly tired and struggling to breathe as the air quality deteriorates around them. The atmosphere is hazy and smoggy, with the professors feeling fatigued and reaching for water bottles in an attempt to catch their breath. In the midst of this, there are small bags of peanuts placed on the desks, symbolizing the struggle with reduced salaries and the phrase "working for peanuts." Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A scene from a Pixar movie ] Using the style of a Pixar movie, let's depict a group of professors in a classroom dealing with deteriorating air quality and struggling to breathe. The atmosphere is hazy and smoggy, with the professors feeling visibly fatigued and reaching for water bottles. Throughout the scene, small bags of peanuts are on the desks, symbolizing the struggle with reduced salaries and the phrase "working for peanuts." The visual should have clear expressions of hardship and weariness on the professors' faces, while still maintaining the whimsical and expressive style of a Pixar movie.

---

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

AI academic paper

The Air-ly Bird Gets the Paycheck: A Breath of Fresh Air for Associate Professor Salaries The Journal of Financial Clout and Fresh Airconomics Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!

Problem variable:	Which variable has a problem? Air quality in Grand Rapids, Michigan Associate Professor salaries in the US Neither / both
Issue:	What is the issue? The data is incorrect The chart isn't displaying properly There is a typo The source link is incorrect A calculation is wrong Something else
Additional details: Optional
Confirm you are a human:

Data details

Why this works

1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably^Note Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
   no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple^Note Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
   p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.

Try it yourself

# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([76.1644,75.8904,70.411,64.2076,70.411,68.4931,70.9589,75.1366,77.8082,80,81.6438,82.2404,62.1918,])
array_2 = np.array([96455,95809,94408,93901,94454,95728,97231,97912,97897,97811,98509,96780,92222,])
array_1_name = "Air quality in Grand Rapids, Michigan"
array_2_name = "Associate Professor salaries in the US"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)

Reuseable content

• High resolution line chart ^Note The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
  
  If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
  
  Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape.
  
• High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
• Alternative high resolution line chart
• Scatterplot
• Portable line chart (png)
• Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
• Line chart for only Air quality in Grand Rapids, Michigan
• Line chart for only Associate Professor salaries in the US
• The spurious research paper: The Air-ly Bird Gets the Paycheck: A Breath of Fresh Air for Associate Professor Salaries