about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #9,388 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Per capita consumption of margarine and the second variable is The number of bellhops in Pennsylvania.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2009, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As people switched to butter, the demand for bellhops to assist with carrying all the heavy, butter-laden dishes decreased, leading to a butter-tly noticeable decline in the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. It seems like these slippery statistics have taken quite a buttermilk plunge!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image that evokes a TIME magazine cover, featuring a scene set in a busy Pennsylvania hotel. The lobby is decorated with statues of bellhops, while in reality, there are fewer actual bellhops present. In the hotel restaurant, tables are adorned with sumptuous dishes laden with butter, with a noticeable decrease in the consumption of margarine as people favor butter instead. Capture the bustling atmosphere and contrast between the ornate statues and the reduced staff presence, as well as the shift from margarine to butter consumption in the restaurant. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Per capita consumption of margarine and The number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A TIME magazine cover image Parallax art inspired by bauhaus a funny image you would see on reddit Brutalism
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Per capita consumption of margarine and The number of bellhops in Pennsylvania, in the following situation: As people switched to butter, the demand for bellhops to assist with carrying all the heavy, butter-laden dishes decreased, leading to a butter-tly noticeable decline in the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. It seems like these slippery statistics have taken quite a buttermilk plunge!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Pennsylvania hotel, the lobby is adorned with statues of bellhops, but there are noticeably fewer of them in real life. Meanwhile, in the hotel restaurant, the tables are spread with delicious dishes laden with butter, but the margarine consumption has visibly decreased as people opt for butter instead.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Pennsylvania hotel, the lobby is adorned with statues of bellhops, but there are noticeably fewer of them in real life. Meanwhile, in the hotel restaurant, the tables are spread with delicious dishes laden with butter, but the margarine consumption has visibly decreased as people opt for butter instead. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image that evokes a TIME magazine cover, featuring a scene set in a busy Pennsylvania hotel. The lobby is decorated with statues of bellhops, while in reality, there are fewer actual bellhops present. In the hotel restaurant, tables are adorned with sumptuous dishes laden with butter, with a noticeable decrease in the consumption of margarine as people favor butter instead. Capture the bustling atmosphere and contrast between the ornate statues and the reduced staff presence, as well as the shift from margarine to butter consumption in the restaurant.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Per capita consumption of margarine caused The number of bellhops in Pennsylvania to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Marginal Margarine: Mapping the Mysterious Magnetism Between Margarine Consumption and the Magnitude of Bellhops in Pennsylvania

The Journal of Culinary Quirkiness

Feb 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Per capita consumption of margarine and The number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from US Department of Agriculture and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9636244 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2009.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Marginal Margarine: Mapping the Mysterious Magnetism Between Margarine Consumption and the Magnitude of Bellhops in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertook a rigorous investigation into the seemingly spurious link between per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. We delved into this dairy dilemma with the aim of shedding light on whether there exists any substantive correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors. Our research team utilized data from the US Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze the trends and patterns from 2003 to 2009.

Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9636244 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicative of a statistically significant association between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania during the specified timeframe. This unexpected finding raises the question, "Does margarine really butter up employment opportunities for bellhops?"

Such a peculiar correlation prompts us to consider potential underlying factors that could possibly explain this perplexing phenomenon. Perhaps there is a hidden relationship, analogous to the butter and margarine debate, which has remained concealed in the dairy aisle of statistical analysis. However, before jumping to any conclusions, we must exercise caution because, as the saying goes, correlation does not imply causation – unless, of course, one is doling out copious amounts of margarine to aspiring bellhops.

Our findings warrant further investigation into the intersecting dynamics of dietary habits and the labor market, as well as the potential societal implications of these curious correlations. Meanwhile, we hope that our work serves as a buttery spread of knowledge for future researchers and encourages them to ch-ewww-se their research subjects wisely.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Per capita consumption of margarine and The number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Marginal Margarine: Mapping the Mysterious Magnetism Between Margarine Consumption and the Magnitude of Bellhops in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertook a rigorous investigation into the seemingly spurious link between per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. We delved into this dairy dilemma with the aim of shedding light on whether there exists any substantive correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors. Our research team utilized data from the US Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze the trends and patterns from 2003 to 2009.

Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9636244 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicative of a statistically significant association between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania during the specified timeframe. This unexpected finding raises the question, "Does margarine really butter up employment opportunities for bellhops?"

Such a peculiar correlation prompts us to consider potential underlying factors that could possibly explain this perplexing phenomenon. Perhaps there is a hidden relationship, analogous to the butter and margarine debate, which has remained concealed in the dairy aisle of statistical analysis. However, before jumping to any conclusions, we must exercise caution because, as the saying goes, correlation does not imply causation – unless, of course, one is doling out copious amounts of margarine to aspiring bellhops.

Our findings warrant further investigation into the intersecting dynamics of dietary habits and the labor market, as well as the potential societal implications of these curious correlations. Meanwhile, we hope that our work serves as a buttery spread of knowledge for future researchers and encourages them to ch-ewww-se their research subjects wisely.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ladies and gentlemen, butter enthusiasts and bellhop aficionados, welcome to the bizarre but undoubtedly intriguing world of margarine consumption and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. As we dive into this conundrum, let me remind you that, in science, it's crucial to keep a margarine of error in mind – after all, we don't want to spread any false conclusions.

You may have heard the age-old adage, "As smooth as margarine." But have you ever stop(ped) to ponder the possible impact of margarine on the employment landscape? Perhaps it's time to churn up some unconventional thoughts, as we embark on our quest to unravel the marginal mysteries that our data has revealed.

Now, finding a connection between margarine consumption and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a haystack – or should I say, as unlikely as finding a stick of margarine in a haystack? But lo and behold, our statistical analysis has unearthed a correlation coefficient that would make even the most experienced statisticians do a double-take. It's as astounding as discovering a bellhop who's lactose intolerant – talk about being butter out of luck!

Casting aside the margarine puns for a moment, let's consider the gravity of these findings. How can we explain this unexpected relationship between a spreadable dairy product and the workforce of Pennsylvania's finest hotels? Could it be as simple as a case of 'butter luck next time' for the bellhop recruitments? Or is there a deeper, more profound connection waiting to be uncovered, much like a hidden treasure buried beneath layers of margarine?

Before we savor the buttery aroma of these correlations, we will need to exercise caution and remember that correlation does not always imply causation. We must tread carefully, like a person allergic to margarine navigating a bakery. Our mission is to separate fact from fiction, to separate the margarine from the milk – or should I say, to separate the margarine from the myths.

As we embark on this scientific escapade, let us not forget that, in research, the unexpected often proves to be the most enlightening. So, grab your statistical utensils, sharpen your critical thinking skills, and let's delve into this enigmatic world where margarine meets bellhops. After all, science waits for no one, but it does have a lot of patience – much like churning a tub of margarine!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Per capita consumption of margarine and The number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Marginal Margarine: Mapping the Mysterious Magnetism Between Margarine Consumption and the Magnitude of Bellhops in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertook a rigorous investigation into the seemingly spurious link between per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. We delved into this dairy dilemma with the aim of shedding light on whether there exists any substantive correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors. Our research team utilized data from the US Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze the trends and patterns from 2003 to 2009.

Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9636244 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicative of a statistically significant association between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania during the specified timeframe. This unexpected finding raises the question, "Does margarine really butter up employment opportunities for bellhops?"

Such a peculiar correlation prompts us to consider potential underlying factors that could possibly explain this perplexing phenomenon. Perhaps there is a hidden relationship, analogous to the butter and margarine debate, which has remained concealed in the dairy aisle of statistical analysis. However, before jumping to any conclusions, we must exercise caution because, as the saying goes, correlation does not imply causation – unless, of course, one is doling out copious amounts of margarine to aspiring bellhops.

Our findings warrant further investigation into the intersecting dynamics of dietary habits and the labor market, as well as the potential societal implications of these curious correlations. Meanwhile, we hope that our work serves as a buttery spread of knowledge for future researchers and encourages them to ch-ewww-se their research subjects wisely.


-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, butter enthusiasts and bellhop aficionados, welcome to the bizarre but undoubtedly intriguing world of margarine consumption and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. As we dive into this conundrum, let me remind you that, in science, it's crucial to keep a margarine of error in mind – after all, we don't want to spread any false conclusions.
You may have heard the age-old adage, "As smooth as margarine." But have you ever stop(ped) to ponder the possible impact of margarine on the employment landscape? Perhaps it's time to churn up some unconventional thoughts, as we embark on our quest to unravel the marginal mysteries that our data has revealed.
Now, finding a connection between margarine consumption and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a haystack – or should I say, as unlikely as finding a stick of margarine in a haystack? But lo and behold, our statistical analysis has unearthed a correlation coefficient that would make even the most experienced statisticians do a double-take. It's as astounding as discovering a bellhop who's lactose intolerant – talk about being butter out of luck!
Casting aside the margarine puns for a moment, let's consider the gravity of these findings. How can we explain this unexpected relationship between a spreadable dairy product and the workforce of Pennsylvania's finest hotels? Could it be as simple as a case of 'butter luck next time' for the bellhop recruitments? Or is there a deeper, more profound connection waiting to be uncovered, much like a hidden treasure buried beneath layers of margarine?
Before we savor the buttery aroma of these correlations, we will need to exercise caution and remember that correlation does not always imply causation. We must tread carefully, like a person allergic to margarine navigating a bakery. Our mission is to separate fact from fiction, to separate the margarine from the milk – or should I say, to separate the margarine from the myths.
As we embark on this scientific escapade, let us not forget that, in research, the unexpected often proves to be the most enlightening. So, grab your statistical utensils, sharpen your critical thinking skills, and let's delve into this enigmatic world where margarine meets bellhops. After all, science waits for no one, but it does have a lot of patience – much like churning a tub of margarine!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith and Jones (2010) proposed a fascinating conceptual framework for understanding the potential nexus between dietary habits and employment trends. The authors assert that seemingly disparate variables may exhibit unexpected correlations, much like the unassuming margarine and the seemingly unrelated number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. As we ponder the implications of their work, we must remember that in the world of statistics, sometimes the most implausible associations yield the most delectable insights.

"Dueling with the Dilemma: Analyzing the Antagonism Between Butter and Margarine" by Doe (2015) grapples with the historical and cultural context of margarine consumption and its potential impact on labor markets. This thought-provoking analysis raises the question: could the spreadability of margarine metaphorically mirror the fluctuations in bellhop employment, much like how a bellhop supplies a room key without a "butter-fingered" approach?

Shifting gears, let us briefly examine non-fiction works that might shed light on this incongruous alliance. "The Big Short" by Michael Lewis delves into the complexities of financial markets, drawing parallels to our study in its exploration of seemingly disconnected yet interwoven forces at play. Likewise, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers a fresh perspective on unconventional correlations, akin to the tangential link we explore between margarine consumption and bellhop numbers.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, "The Bell Jar" by Sylvia Plath strikes a curious chord with our investigation, prompting us to contemplate the glass ceiling that margarine may or may not have shattered in influencing employment. Similarly, "Butter" by Erin Jade Lange explores themes of transformation and resilience, providing a playful parallel to the metamorphosis of our statistical data into a comedic churn of margarine-related findings.

In a tangential yet relevant manner, films such as "Groundhog Day" and "Hotel Transylvania" offer whimsical insights into the cyclical nature of events akin to the recurring patterns observed in our data. These cinematic references serve as a lighthearted reminder that just as the characters in these films encounter unexpected twists, so too can statistical analyses uncover peculiar connections – much like an unexpected pat of margarine amidst a basket of dinner rolls.

In the wise words of an anonymous butter enthusiast, "You can't butter me up with flimsy correlations, but margarine might just spread some surprising tales." As we navigate through this literature, let us keep an open mind and a discerning eye, for in the dance between margarine consumption and bellhop numbers, there may be hidden layers waiting to be uncovered – much like a perfectly flaky croissant.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Per capita consumption of margarine and The number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Department of Agriculture and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2009

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Marginal Margarine: Mapping the Mysterious Magnetism Between Margarine Consumption and the Magnitude of Bellhops in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertook a rigorous investigation into the seemingly spurious link between per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. We delved into this dairy dilemma with the aim of shedding light on whether there exists any substantive correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors. Our research team utilized data from the US Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze the trends and patterns from 2003 to 2009.

Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9636244 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicative of a statistically significant association between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania during the specified timeframe. This unexpected finding raises the question, "Does margarine really butter up employment opportunities for bellhops?"

Such a peculiar correlation prompts us to consider potential underlying factors that could possibly explain this perplexing phenomenon. Perhaps there is a hidden relationship, analogous to the butter and margarine debate, which has remained concealed in the dairy aisle of statistical analysis. However, before jumping to any conclusions, we must exercise caution because, as the saying goes, correlation does not imply causation – unless, of course, one is doling out copious amounts of margarine to aspiring bellhops.

Our findings warrant further investigation into the intersecting dynamics of dietary habits and the labor market, as well as the potential societal implications of these curious correlations. Meanwhile, we hope that our work serves as a buttery spread of knowledge for future researchers and encourages them to ch-ewww-se their research subjects wisely.


[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, butter enthusiasts and bellhop aficionados, welcome to the bizarre but undoubtedly intriguing world of margarine consumption and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. As we dive into this conundrum, let me remind you that, in science, it's crucial to keep a margarine of error in mind – after all, we don't want to spread any false conclusions.
You may have heard the age-old adage, "As smooth as margarine." But have you ever stop(ped) to ponder the possible impact of margarine on the employment landscape? Perhaps it's time to churn up some unconventional thoughts, as we embark on our quest to unravel the marginal mysteries that our data has revealed.
Now, finding a connection between margarine consumption and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a haystack – or should I say, as unlikely as finding a stick of margarine in a haystack? But lo and behold, our statistical analysis has unearthed a correlation coefficient that would make even the most experienced statisticians do a double-take. It's as astounding as discovering a bellhop who's lactose intolerant – talk about being butter out of luck!
Casting aside the margarine puns for a moment, let's consider the gravity of these findings. How can we explain this unexpected relationship between a spreadable dairy product and the workforce of Pennsylvania's finest hotels? Could it be as simple as a case of 'butter luck next time' for the bellhop recruitments? Or is there a deeper, more profound connection waiting to be uncovered, much like a hidden treasure buried beneath layers of margarine?
Before we savor the buttery aroma of these correlations, we will need to exercise caution and remember that correlation does not always imply causation. We must tread carefully, like a person allergic to margarine navigating a bakery. Our mission is to separate fact from fiction, to separate the margarine from the milk – or should I say, to separate the margarine from the myths.
As we embark on this scientific escapade, let us not forget that, in research, the unexpected often proves to be the most enlightening. So, grab your statistical utensils, sharpen your critical thinking skills, and let's delve into this enigmatic world where margarine meets bellhops. After all, science waits for no one, but it does have a lot of patience – much like churning a tub of margarine!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the tangled web of margarine consumption and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania, our research team employed a multifaceted approach akin to peeling back the layers of an onion – or in this case, the layers of a butter substitute. We gathered data from the US Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, extracting information on per capita margarine consumption and the employment figures for bellhops in Pennsylvania from the years 2003 to 2009. Just like a diligent baker meticulously measuring ingredients for a delicate soufflé, we meticulously curated and compiled the data for rigorous analysis.

Our first step involved conducting an in-depth exploration of the temporal trends in per capita margarine consumption and the employment levels of bellhops. We wanted to see if these metrics waltzed in harmony or performed a discordant ballet. Much like a chef experimenting with a new recipe, we were poised to uncover whether these variables complemented each other or clashed like oil and water – or perhaps, margarine and bellhops!

Next, we employed statistical tools to quantify the potential relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. We utilized advanced regression analysis, aiming to discern whether there existed a linear relationship between per capita margarine consumption and the number of bellhops employed in Pennsylvania. Our regression model made Sherlock Holmes look like a mere amateur sleuth as we sleuthed out any hint of association between the two variables.

In addition to our regression analysis, we conducted a variety of statistical tests to confirm the strength and significance of any observed correlations. We dotted our i's and crossed our t's, ensuring that our findings were as robust as the viscosity of margarine on a cold winter day. We considered a wide array of potential confounding variables, striving to weed out any spurious relationships and separate the margarine from the myths.

Once we had meticulously combed through the data and performed our statistical wizardry, we stood in awe as the correlation coefficient revealed itself to us. To put it plainly, our results were as surprising as finding a bellhop who moonlights as a butter sculptor. We discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9636244 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicative of a statistically significant association between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. It seemed as improbable as finding a margarine sculpture at a hotel entrance – truly a sculpting feat worth celebrating!

Furthermore, we conducted sensitivity analyses and robustness checks to ensure that our findings were not merely a mirage in a margarine-filled desert. We wanted to confirm that our results were as reliable as a butter knife in a kitchen – sharp and indispensable for interpreting the culinary landscape of statistical predictions.

In conclusion, our methodology was akin to conducting a rigorous archaeological dig in the margarine-laden soils of Pennsylvania, unearthing a correlation that rivals the enigmatic allure of an ancient artifact. We dared to ask unconventional questions and to venture into uncharted statistical territories, uncovering a connection that challenges our preconceived notions about the subtle influence of margarine on the labor dynamics of bellhops. Just like a buttery spread on warm toast, our methodology paved the way for embracing the unexpected and savoring the tantalizing mysteries of statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Per capita consumption of margarine and The number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Department of Agriculture and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2009, you found a correlation 0.9636244, r-squared of 0.9285719, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Marginal Margarine: Mapping the Mysterious Magnetism Between Margarine Consumption and the Magnitude of Bellhops in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertook a rigorous investigation into the seemingly spurious link between per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. We delved into this dairy dilemma with the aim of shedding light on whether there exists any substantive correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors. Our research team utilized data from the US Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze the trends and patterns from 2003 to 2009.

Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9636244 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicative of a statistically significant association between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania during the specified timeframe. This unexpected finding raises the question, "Does margarine really butter up employment opportunities for bellhops?"

Such a peculiar correlation prompts us to consider potential underlying factors that could possibly explain this perplexing phenomenon. Perhaps there is a hidden relationship, analogous to the butter and margarine debate, which has remained concealed in the dairy aisle of statistical analysis. However, before jumping to any conclusions, we must exercise caution because, as the saying goes, correlation does not imply causation – unless, of course, one is doling out copious amounts of margarine to aspiring bellhops.

Our findings warrant further investigation into the intersecting dynamics of dietary habits and the labor market, as well as the potential societal implications of these curious correlations. Meanwhile, we hope that our work serves as a buttery spread of knowledge for future researchers and encourages them to ch-ewww-se their research subjects wisely.


-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen, butter enthusiasts and bellhop aficionados, welcome to the bizarre but undoubtedly intriguing world of margarine consumption and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. As we dive into this conundrum, let me remind you that, in science, it's crucial to keep a margarine of error in mind – after all, we don't want to spread any false conclusions.
You may have heard the age-old adage, "As smooth as margarine." But have you ever stop(ped) to ponder the possible impact of margarine on the employment landscape? Perhaps it's time to churn up some unconventional thoughts, as we embark on our quest to unravel the marginal mysteries that our data has revealed.
Now, finding a connection between margarine consumption and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a haystack – or should I say, as unlikely as finding a stick of margarine in a haystack? But lo and behold, our statistical analysis has unearthed a correlation coefficient that would make even the most experienced statisticians do a double-take. It's as astounding as discovering a bellhop who's lactose intolerant – talk about being butter out of luck!
Casting aside the margarine puns for a moment, let's consider the gravity of these findings. How can we explain this unexpected relationship between a spreadable dairy product and the workforce of Pennsylvania's finest hotels? Could it be as simple as a case of 'butter luck next time' for the bellhop recruitments? Or is there a deeper, more profound connection waiting to be uncovered, much like a hidden treasure buried beneath layers of margarine?
Before we savor the buttery aroma of these correlations, we will need to exercise caution and remember that correlation does not always imply causation. We must tread carefully, like a person allergic to margarine navigating a bakery. Our mission is to separate fact from fiction, to separate the margarine from the milk – or should I say, to separate the margarine from the myths.
As we embark on this scientific escapade, let us not forget that, in research, the unexpected often proves to be the most enlightening. So, grab your statistical utensils, sharpen your critical thinking skills, and let's delve into this enigmatic world where margarine meets bellhops. After all, science waits for no one, but it does have a lot of patience – much like churning a tub of margarine!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data collected from the US Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2003 to 2009 revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9636244 between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. This unexpected finding suggests a strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It's as surprising as finding a margarine sculpture at a dairy convention - truly unexpected!

The correlation coefficient of 0.9636244 indicates a very strong positive linear relationship between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. This kind of association is as unexpected as finding margarine in a bellhop's pocket - it's a curious combination, to say the least. The high correlation coefficient may raise a few eyebrows, much like seeing a bellhop spreading margarine on a roll at a hotel breakfast buffet.

Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.9285719 suggests that approximately 93% of the variation in the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania can be explained by the per capita consumption of margarine. It's as if margarine is shaping the employment landscape in Pennsylvania, quite like a bellhop shaping a pillow into a perfect peacock - unexpected and intriguing. This strong predictive power of margarine consumption on the number of bellhops is akin to a bellhop finely predicting a guest's needs before they ring the service bell.

With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings indicate a statistically significant association between these variables. This level of significance is as clear as seeing margarine fingerprints on a room service tray - there's no denying it. The p-value confirms that the correlation we found is highly unlikely to be a result of random chance, much like discovering that bellhops in Pennsylvania are statistically unlikely to be indifferent to margarine consumption.

Upon visualizing the relationship between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania, our scatterplot (Fig. 1) further illustrates the strong correlation we uncovered. It's as revealing as a magnifying glass focusing on a butter carving competition - you can't help but marvel at the unexpected connections when they're right in front of you.

In conclusion, our research has unveiled a surprising and statistically significant association between margarine consumption and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. It's as fascinating as discovering that bellhops are aficionados of margarine art. These unexpected findings open the door to further exploration of the interplay between dietary habits and the labor market. We hope our findings serve as a beacon of curiosity in the scientific community, much like a beacon of butter in a sea of statistical data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Per capita consumption of margarine and The number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Marginal Margarine: Mapping the Mysterious Magnetism Between Margarine Consumption and the Magnitude of Bellhops in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertook a rigorous investigation into the seemingly spurious link between per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. We delved into this dairy dilemma with the aim of shedding light on whether there exists any substantive correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors. Our research team utilized data from the US Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze the trends and patterns from 2003 to 2009.

Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9636244 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicative of a statistically significant association between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania during the specified timeframe. This unexpected finding raises the question, "Does margarine really butter up employment opportunities for bellhops?"

Such a peculiar correlation prompts us to consider potential underlying factors that could possibly explain this perplexing phenomenon. Perhaps there is a hidden relationship, analogous to the butter and margarine debate, which has remained concealed in the dairy aisle of statistical analysis. However, before jumping to any conclusions, we must exercise caution because, as the saying goes, correlation does not imply causation – unless, of course, one is doling out copious amounts of margarine to aspiring bellhops.

Our findings warrant further investigation into the intersecting dynamics of dietary habits and the labor market, as well as the potential societal implications of these curious correlations. Meanwhile, we hope that our work serves as a buttery spread of knowledge for future researchers and encourages them to ch-ewww-se their research subjects wisely.


[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith and Jones (2010) proposed a fascinating conceptual framework for understanding the potential nexus between dietary habits and employment trends. The authors assert that seemingly disparate variables may exhibit unexpected correlations, much like the unassuming margarine and the seemingly unrelated number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. As we ponder the implications of their work, we must remember that in the world of statistics, sometimes the most implausible associations yield the most delectable insights.
"Dueling with the Dilemma: Analyzing the Antagonism Between Butter and Margarine" by Doe (2015) grapples with the historical and cultural context of margarine consumption and its potential impact on labor markets. This thought-provoking analysis raises the question: could the spreadability of margarine metaphorically mirror the fluctuations in bellhop employment, much like how a bellhop supplies a room key without a "butter-fingered" approach?
Shifting gears, let us briefly examine non-fiction works that might shed light on this incongruous alliance. "The Big Short" by Michael Lewis delves into the complexities of financial markets, drawing parallels to our study in its exploration of seemingly disconnected yet interwoven forces at play. Likewise, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offers a fresh perspective on unconventional correlations, akin to the tangential link we explore between margarine consumption and bellhop numbers.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, "The Bell Jar" by Sylvia Plath strikes a curious chord with our investigation, prompting us to contemplate the glass ceiling that margarine may or may not have shattered in influencing employment. Similarly, "Butter" by Erin Jade Lange explores themes of transformation and resilience, providing a playful parallel to the metamorphosis of our statistical data into a comedic churn of margarine-related findings.
In a tangential yet relevant manner, films such as "Groundhog Day" and "Hotel Transylvania" offer whimsical insights into the cyclical nature of events akin to the recurring patterns observed in our data. These cinematic references serve as a lighthearted reminder that just as the characters in these films encounter unexpected twists, so too can statistical analyses uncover peculiar connections – much like an unexpected pat of margarine amidst a basket of dinner rolls.
In the wise words of an anonymous butter enthusiast, "You can't butter me up with flimsy correlations, but margarine might just spread some surprising tales." As we navigate through this literature, let us keep an open mind and a discerning eye, for in the dance between margarine consumption and bellhop numbers, there may be hidden layers waiting to be uncovered – much like a perfectly flaky croissant.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data collected from the US Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2003 to 2009 revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9636244 between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. This unexpected finding suggests a strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It's as surprising as finding a margarine sculpture at a dairy convention - truly unexpected!
The correlation coefficient of 0.9636244 indicates a very strong positive linear relationship between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. This kind of association is as unexpected as finding margarine in a bellhop's pocket - it's a curious combination, to say the least. The high correlation coefficient may raise a few eyebrows, much like seeing a bellhop spreading margarine on a roll at a hotel breakfast buffet.
Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.9285719 suggests that approximately 93% of the variation in the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania can be explained by the per capita consumption of margarine. It's as if margarine is shaping the employment landscape in Pennsylvania, quite like a bellhop shaping a pillow into a perfect peacock - unexpected and intriguing. This strong predictive power of margarine consumption on the number of bellhops is akin to a bellhop finely predicting a guest's needs before they ring the service bell.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings indicate a statistically significant association between these variables. This level of significance is as clear as seeing margarine fingerprints on a room service tray - there's no denying it. The p-value confirms that the correlation we found is highly unlikely to be a result of random chance, much like discovering that bellhops in Pennsylvania are statistically unlikely to be indifferent to margarine consumption.
Upon visualizing the relationship between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania, our scatterplot (Fig. 1) further illustrates the strong correlation we uncovered. It's as revealing as a magnifying glass focusing on a butter carving competition - you can't help but marvel at the unexpected connections when they're right in front of you.
In conclusion, our research has unveiled a surprising and statistically significant association between margarine consumption and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. It's as fascinating as discovering that bellhops are aficionados of margarine art. These unexpected findings open the door to further exploration of the interplay between dietary habits and the labor market. We hope our findings serve as a beacon of curiosity in the scientific community, much like a beacon of butter in a sea of statistical data.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have churned up some truly unexpected and intriguing findings. Our research uncovered a surprisingly strong correlation between per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. It's as unexpected as finding margarine in a bellhop's pocket - truly a curious combination, to say the least. Our findings not only support the empirical work of Smith and Jones (2010) but also align with the whimsical musings of an anonymous butter enthusiast who proclaimed, "You can't butter me up with flimsy correlations, but margarine might just spread some surprising tales."

Our statistical analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9636244, indicative of a very strong positive linear relationship between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. This level of association is as surprising as finding a margarine sculpture at a dairy convention - truly unexpected! The high correlation coefficient reinforces the intriguing notion proposed by Doe (2015) that the spreadability of margarine could metaphorically mirror fluctuations in bellhop employment, much like how a bellhop supplies a room key without a "butter-fingered" approach.

The r-squared value of 0.9285719 suggests that approximately 93% of the variation in the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania can be explained by the per capita consumption of margarine. It's as if margarine is shaping the employment landscape in Pennsylvania, quite like a bellhop shaping a pillow into a perfect peacock - unexpected and intriguing. This aligns with the thought-provoking analysis of "The Big Short" by Michael Lewis, which delves into seemingly disconnected yet interwoven forces at play in financial markets.

Furthermore, the statistically significant association, as confirmed by the p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the undeniable link between these variables. It's as clear as seeing margarine fingerprints on a room service tray - there's no denying it. The p-value confirms that the correlation we found is highly unlikely to be a result of random chance, much like discovering that bellhops in Pennsylvania are statistically unlikely to be indifferent to margarine consumption.

While our findings may seem as unexpected as a bellhop spreading margarine on a roll at a hotel breakfast buffet, they open the door to further exploration of the interplay between dietary habits and the labor market. We hope our research serves as a beacon of curiosity in the scientific community, much like a beacon of butter in a sea of statistical data. It's clear that the butter and margarine debate holds both culinary and career implications, and we look forward to the future research it will churn out.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Per capita consumption of margarine and The number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Marginal Margarine: Mapping the Mysterious Magnetism Between Margarine Consumption and the Magnitude of Bellhops in Pennsylvania

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we undertook a rigorous investigation into the seemingly spurious link between per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. We delved into this dairy dilemma with the aim of shedding light on whether there exists any substantive correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors. Our research team utilized data from the US Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze the trends and patterns from 2003 to 2009.

Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9636244 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicative of a statistically significant association between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania during the specified timeframe. This unexpected finding raises the question, "Does margarine really butter up employment opportunities for bellhops?"

Such a peculiar correlation prompts us to consider potential underlying factors that could possibly explain this perplexing phenomenon. Perhaps there is a hidden relationship, analogous to the butter and margarine debate, which has remained concealed in the dairy aisle of statistical analysis. However, before jumping to any conclusions, we must exercise caution because, as the saying goes, correlation does not imply causation – unless, of course, one is doling out copious amounts of margarine to aspiring bellhops.

Our findings warrant further investigation into the intersecting dynamics of dietary habits and the labor market, as well as the potential societal implications of these curious correlations. Meanwhile, we hope that our work serves as a buttery spread of knowledge for future researchers and encourages them to ch-ewww-se their research subjects wisely.


[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, butter enthusiasts and bellhop aficionados, welcome to the bizarre but undoubtedly intriguing world of margarine consumption and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. As we dive into this conundrum, let me remind you that, in science, it's crucial to keep a margarine of error in mind – after all, we don't want to spread any false conclusions.
You may have heard the age-old adage, "As smooth as margarine." But have you ever stop(ped) to ponder the possible impact of margarine on the employment landscape? Perhaps it's time to churn up some unconventional thoughts, as we embark on our quest to unravel the marginal mysteries that our data has revealed.
Now, finding a connection between margarine consumption and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania may seem as unlikely as finding a needle in a haystack – or should I say, as unlikely as finding a stick of margarine in a haystack? But lo and behold, our statistical analysis has unearthed a correlation coefficient that would make even the most experienced statisticians do a double-take. It's as astounding as discovering a bellhop who's lactose intolerant – talk about being butter out of luck!
Casting aside the margarine puns for a moment, let's consider the gravity of these findings. How can we explain this unexpected relationship between a spreadable dairy product and the workforce of Pennsylvania's finest hotels? Could it be as simple as a case of 'butter luck next time' for the bellhop recruitments? Or is there a deeper, more profound connection waiting to be uncovered, much like a hidden treasure buried beneath layers of margarine?
Before we savor the buttery aroma of these correlations, we will need to exercise caution and remember that correlation does not always imply causation. We must tread carefully, like a person allergic to margarine navigating a bakery. Our mission is to separate fact from fiction, to separate the margarine from the milk – or should I say, to separate the margarine from the myths.
As we embark on this scientific escapade, let us not forget that, in research, the unexpected often proves to be the most enlightening. So, grab your statistical utensils, sharpen your critical thinking skills, and let's delve into this enigmatic world where margarine meets bellhops. After all, science waits for no one, but it does have a lot of patience – much like churning a tub of margarine!

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data collected from the US Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of Labor Statistics from 2003 to 2009 revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9636244 between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. This unexpected finding suggests a strong association between these two seemingly unrelated variables. It's as surprising as finding a margarine sculpture at a dairy convention - truly unexpected!
The correlation coefficient of 0.9636244 indicates a very strong positive linear relationship between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. This kind of association is as unexpected as finding margarine in a bellhop's pocket - it's a curious combination, to say the least. The high correlation coefficient may raise a few eyebrows, much like seeing a bellhop spreading margarine on a roll at a hotel breakfast buffet.
Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.9285719 suggests that approximately 93% of the variation in the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania can be explained by the per capita consumption of margarine. It's as if margarine is shaping the employment landscape in Pennsylvania, quite like a bellhop shaping a pillow into a perfect peacock - unexpected and intriguing. This strong predictive power of margarine consumption on the number of bellhops is akin to a bellhop finely predicting a guest's needs before they ring the service bell.
With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings indicate a statistically significant association between these variables. This level of significance is as clear as seeing margarine fingerprints on a room service tray - there's no denying it. The p-value confirms that the correlation we found is highly unlikely to be a result of random chance, much like discovering that bellhops in Pennsylvania are statistically unlikely to be indifferent to margarine consumption.
Upon visualizing the relationship between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania, our scatterplot (Fig. 1) further illustrates the strong correlation we uncovered. It's as revealing as a magnifying glass focusing on a butter carving competition - you can't help but marvel at the unexpected connections when they're right in front of you.
In conclusion, our research has unveiled a surprising and statistically significant association between margarine consumption and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. It's as fascinating as discovering that bellhops are aficionados of margarine art. These unexpected findings open the door to further exploration of the interplay between dietary habits and the labor market. We hope our findings serve as a beacon of curiosity in the scientific community, much like a beacon of butter in a sea of statistical data.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has churned up some unexpected findings regarding the seemingly implausible connection between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. Our results have spread light on a correlation coefficient of 0.9636244 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant association between these two variables. This revelation might just be as surprising as finding a margarine sculpture at a dairy convention - a real game-changer in the realm of dairy art and statistical oddities!

The calculated r-squared value of 0.9285719 suggests that approximately 93% of the variation in the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania can be explained by the per capita consumption of margarine. It's as if margarine is shaping the employment landscape in Pennsylvania, quite like a bellhop shaping a pillow into a perfect peacock - truly an unexpected and intriguing connection!

With a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings indicate a statistically significant association between these variables. This level of significance is as clear as seeing margarine fingerprints on a room service tray - there's no denying it. The p-value confirms that the correlation we found is highly unlikely to be a result of random chance, much like discovering that bellhops in Pennsylvania are statistically unlikely to be indifferent to margarine consumption.

Moreover, our scatterplot (Fig. 1) further illustrates the strong correlation we uncovered. It's as revealing as a magnifying glass focusing on a butter carving competition - you can't help but marvel at the unexpected connections when they're right in front of you.

The unexpected and statistically significant association between margarine consumption and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania raises thought-provoking questions about the interplay between dietary habits and the labor market. But as we wrap up this buttery saga of statistical marvels, we must remember the wise words of a dairy connoisseur: "Do not cry over spilled milk, but do celebrate unexpected correlations, for they churn the wheels of knowledge."

In light of these findings, we firmly assert that further research in this peculiar territory is unnecessary. We have uncovered a gamut of gooey insights into the enigmatic world where margarine meets bellhops. It's time for the scientific community to spread its wings and churn toward new, unexplored frontiers. After all, in research, as in spreading margarine, sometimes one must know when to stop. And in this case, the time is "butter"ly right now!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Marginal Margarine: Mapping the Mysterious Magnetism Between Margarine Consumption and the Magnitude of Bellhops in Pennsylvania. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Culinary Quirkiness


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Marginal Margarine: Mapping the Mysterious Magnetism Between Margarine Consumption and the Magnitude of Bellhops in Pennsylvania. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Margarine Dynamics and Bellhop Quantification


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Marginal Margarine: Mapping the Mysterious Magnetism Between Margarine Consumption and the Magnitude of Bellhops in Pennsylvania with an abstract of In this study, we undertook a rigorous investigation into the seemingly spurious link between per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania. We delved into this dairy dilemma with the aim of shedding light on whether there exists any substantive correlation between these two seemingly unrelated factors. Our research team utilized data from the US Department of Agriculture and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze the trends and patterns from 2003 to 2009.
Surprisingly, our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9636244 with a p-value less than 0.01, indicative of a statistically significant association between the per capita consumption of margarine and the number of bellhops in Pennsylvania during the specified timeframe. This unexpected finding raises the question, "Does margarine really butter up employment opportunities for bellhops?"
Such a peculiar correlation prompts us to consider potential underlying factors that could possibly explain this perplexing phenomenon. Perhaps there is a hidden relationship, analogous to the butter and margarine debate, which has remained concealed in the dairy aisle of statistical analysis. However, before jumping to any conclusions, we must exercise caution because, as the saying goes, correlation does not imply causation – unless, of course, one is doling out copious amounts of margarine to aspiring bellhops.
Our findings warrant further investigation into the intersecting dynamics of dietary habits and the labor market, as well as the potential societal implications of these curious correlations. Meanwhile, we hope that our work serves as a buttery spread of knowledge for future researchers and encourages them to ch-ewww-se their research subjects wisely.

ChatGPT:

margarine consumption, bellhops Pennsylvania, correlation, dairy consumption, employment trends, statistical analysis, US Department of Agriculture data, Bureau of Labor Statistics, dietary habits, labor market, societal implications, research methodology

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Per capita consumption of margarine
Detailed data title: Per capita consumption of margarine in the United States
Source: US Department of Agriculture
See what else correlates with Per capita consumption of margarine

The number of bellhops in Pennsylvania
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of baggage porters and bellhops in Pennsylvania
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of bellhops in Pennsylvania

Correlation r = 0.9636244 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9285719 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of bellhops in Pennsylvania) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Per capita consumption of margarine) over the 7 years from 2003 through 2009.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00048. 0.0004752959335739196000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 0.048% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,104 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 6 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 6 because we have two variables measured over a period of 7 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.77, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009
Per capita consumption of margarine (Pounds of margarine)5.35.244.64.54.23.7
The number of bellhops in Pennsylvania (Laborers)2270198013601640142013401100




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5.3,5.2,4,4.6,4.5,4.2,3.7,])
array_2 = np.array([2270,1980,1360,1640,1420,1340,1100,])
array_1_name = "Per capita consumption of margarine"
array_2_name = "The number of bellhops in Pennsylvania"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 9388 · Black Variable ID: 26741 · Red Variable ID: 13713
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0