about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #7,199 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the second variable is Accenture's stock price (ACN).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As household spending on meat and poultry rose, more people experienced the joy of sizzling bacon and clucking chicken. This joy led to an increase in overall happiness, causing a surge in productivity. With improved productivity, businesses like Accenture flourished, leading to a rise in their stock price. Who knew that the path to financial success was seasoned with a little extra oregano on your grilled salmon?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a cozy backyard setting with a high-tech twist. Show a family gathered around a sizzling barbecue, with a futuristic grill emitting a sleek, vibrant glow. The scene is filled with the delicious aroma of grilling meats and poultry, depicted through swirling, ethereal wisps of savory scents. The family's smiles are radiant and enhanced with subtle technological highlights reflecting their overall happiness. In the background, a digital ticker symbolizing the stock market displays the soaring price of Accenture, with a modern, dynamic representation of business growth and success. The visual should seamlessly blend the traditional warmth of a family barbecue with elements of cutting-edge technology, creating an evocative and visually striking scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and Accenture's stock price (ACN). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image Oragami Macabre High-tech Cyber folk
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and Accenture's stock price (ACN), in the following situation: As household spending on meat and poultry rose, more people experienced the joy of sizzling bacon and clucking chicken. This joy led to an increase in overall happiness, causing a surge in productivity. With improved productivity, businesses like Accenture flourished, leading to a rise in their stock price. Who knew that the path to financial success was seasoned with a little extra oregano on your grilled salmon?. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a cozy backyard, a family gathered around a sizzling barbecue, filling the air with the delicious aroma of grilling meats and poultry. As they savored the joy of their sumptuous meal, their smiles grew wider, and their overall happiness soared. Meanwhile, in the bustling city, the stock price of Accenture soared on the digital ticker, reflecting the flourishing success of businesses. The scent of sizzling bacon and clucking chicken seemed to infuse the air with a dose of productivity, causing both the family and the stock market to flourish in unison.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In a cozy backyard, a family gathered around a sizzling barbecue, filling the air with the delicious aroma of grilling meats and poultry. As they savored the joy of their sumptuous meal, their smiles grew wider, and their overall happiness soared. Meanwhile, in the bustling city, the stock price of Accenture soared on the digital ticker, reflecting the flourishing success of businesses. The scent of sizzling bacon and clucking chicken seemed to infuse the air with a dose of productivity, causing both the family and the stock market to flourish in unison. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a cozy backyard setting with a high-tech twist. Show a family gathered around a sizzling barbecue, with a futuristic grill emitting a sleek, vibrant glow. The scene is filled with the delicious aroma of grilling meats and poultry, depicted through swirling, ethereal wisps of savory scents. The family's smiles are radiant and enhanced with subtle technological highlights reflecting their overall happiness. In the background, a digital ticker symbolizing the stock market displays the soaring price of Accenture, with a modern, dynamic representation of business growth and success. The visual should seamlessly blend the traditional warmth of a family barbecue with elements of cutting-edge technology, creating an evocative and visually striking scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs caused Accenture's stock price (ACN) to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Meat-ing the Market: A Correlational Analysis of US Household Spending on Animal Proteins and Accenture's Stock Price

The Journal of Gastronomics and Finance

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and Accenture's stock price (ACN). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9610203 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Meat-ing the Market: A Correlational Analysis of US Household Spending on Animal Proteins and Accenture's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper seeks to investigate the curious relationship between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock performance of Accenture (ACN). Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), a thorough analysis spanning the period from 2002 to 2022 was conducted. The findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9610203, with a p-value of less than 0.01, thus indicating a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This paper elucidates the implications of such a correlation, pondering whether investment in animal proteins may hold the key to predicting Accenture's stock trajectory. It also invites further exploration into the whimsical world of market influences, where even the cluck of a chicken or the splash of a fish may hold sway over stock prices.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and Accenture's stock price (ACN). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Meat-ing the Market: A Correlational Analysis of US Household Spending on Animal Proteins and Accenture's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper seeks to investigate the curious relationship between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock performance of Accenture (ACN). Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), a thorough analysis spanning the period from 2002 to 2022 was conducted. The findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9610203, with a p-value of less than 0.01, thus indicating a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This paper elucidates the implications of such a correlation, pondering whether investment in animal proteins may hold the key to predicting Accenture's stock trajectory. It also invites further exploration into the whimsical world of market influences, where even the cluck of a chicken or the splash of a fish may hold sway over stock prices.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of investment is a complex and enigmatic realm, where the rise and fall of stock prices seem to dance to an invisible tune, influenced by an array of factors, both rational and obscure. While traditional analyses tend to focus on economic indicators, market trends, and company performance, there may be unexpected connections lurking beneath the surface. Our study delves into the uncharted territory of household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs, and its potential link to the stock price of Accenture, a global professional services company.

The premise of our investigation may seem, at first glance, as incongruous as a chicken wearing a tuxedo, but as the data unfurls before us, an intriguing pattern emerges. We retraced our steps through over two decades of data, crunching numbers with the precision of a sushi chef slicing sashimi, and the results were astonishing. The correlation coefficient of 0.9610203 between annual US household spending on animal proteins and Accenture's stock price not only raised eyebrows but also prompted us to reflect on the peculiar interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains.

As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, it is paramount to consider the potential implications of our findings. Could a carnivorous culinary inclination be a harbinger of stock market movements? Is there a surreal, symbiotic relationship between the sizzle of a steak and the ascent of a stock price? While the notion may initially provoke a chuckle or an arched eyebrow, it behooves us to delve deeper into the whimsical realm of market dynamics.

Stay tuned as we dissect the data, draw nuanced parallels, and, dare I say, relish in the uncanny correlation between protein-packed purchases and stock market swings. The findings of this study may not only add a dash of humor to the world of economics but also unveil a meaty revelation concealed within the labyrinth of market forces. After all, in the market's menu of influences, who's to say that a well-marbled steak isn't as potent as a fiscal report?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and Accenture's stock price (ACN). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Meat-ing the Market: A Correlational Analysis of US Household Spending on Animal Proteins and Accenture's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper seeks to investigate the curious relationship between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock performance of Accenture (ACN). Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), a thorough analysis spanning the period from 2002 to 2022 was conducted. The findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9610203, with a p-value of less than 0.01, thus indicating a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This paper elucidates the implications of such a correlation, pondering whether investment in animal proteins may hold the key to predicting Accenture's stock trajectory. It also invites further exploration into the whimsical world of market influences, where even the cluck of a chicken or the splash of a fish may hold sway over stock prices.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of investment is a complex and enigmatic realm, where the rise and fall of stock prices seem to dance to an invisible tune, influenced by an array of factors, both rational and obscure. While traditional analyses tend to focus on economic indicators, market trends, and company performance, there may be unexpected connections lurking beneath the surface. Our study delves into the uncharted territory of household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs, and its potential link to the stock price of Accenture, a global professional services company.
The premise of our investigation may seem, at first glance, as incongruous as a chicken wearing a tuxedo, but as the data unfurls before us, an intriguing pattern emerges. We retraced our steps through over two decades of data, crunching numbers with the precision of a sushi chef slicing sashimi, and the results were astonishing. The correlation coefficient of 0.9610203 between annual US household spending on animal proteins and Accenture's stock price not only raised eyebrows but also prompted us to reflect on the peculiar interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains.
As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, it is paramount to consider the potential implications of our findings. Could a carnivorous culinary inclination be a harbinger of stock market movements? Is there a surreal, symbiotic relationship between the sizzle of a steak and the ascent of a stock price? While the notion may initially provoke a chuckle or an arched eyebrow, it behooves us to delve deeper into the whimsical realm of market dynamics.
Stay tuned as we dissect the data, draw nuanced parallels, and, dare I say, relish in the uncanny correlation between protein-packed purchases and stock market swings. The findings of this study may not only add a dash of humor to the world of economics but also unveil a meaty revelation concealed within the labyrinth of market forces. After all, in the market's menu of influences, who's to say that a well-marbled steak isn't as potent as a fiscal report?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find that annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs has traditionally been a matter of sustenance and culinary preference. The confluence of economic factors, consumer behavior, and dietary habits underscores the significance of protein acquisition within the realm of household expenditures. Such a dynamic landscape prompts exploration into potential ramifications on financial markets, including the stock price performance of global entities such as Accenture.

On a related note, Doe's study underscores the multifaceted nature of consumer choices in the realm of protein consumption. The intricate interplay between dietary preferences, socio-economic status, and market trends offers an intriguing backdrop for our investigation into the correlation between household spending on animal proteins and stock prices. The findings of this study shed light on the intricate tapestry of consumer behavior and its potential reverberations in the domain of financial markets.

Moreover, Jones' research delves into the psychological underpinnings of consumer decision-making processes, particularly in the context of food choices. The nuanced interplay between perception, desire, and economic considerations within the sphere of protein purchases introduces an additional layer of complexity to our exploration.

Turning to the realm of literature, "Economics of Food and Agricultural Markets" and "The History of Food" present comprehensive analyses of consumer behavior in the context of food procurement. While not directly addressing our specific inquiry, these works offer valuable insights into the complexities of food-related preferences and their broader societal implications.

In a slightly more whimsical vein, the inclusion of "The Joy of Cooking" and "Like Water for Chocolate" in our literary landscape provides a nod to the intricate relationship between culinary arts and human experience. While these works may not directly underpin our investigation, they serve as a delightful reminder of the multifaceted nature of food and its potential influences on various facets of life, including economic phenomena.

Venturing into the realm of cinematic musings, the movies "Babette's Feast" and "Big Night" provide vivid portrayals of the significance of culinary experiences. While not directly linked to our examination of household spending on animal proteins and stock prices, these films offer a cinematic feast for the senses, inviting contemplation on the diverse influences of gastronomic pursuits.

Overall, the literature and cultural references surrounding the domains of food, consumer behavior, and culinary arts offer a rich backdrop for our exploration of the intriguing correlation between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock performance of Accenture. As we delve further into our analysis, it becomes evident that the realm of economics and market forces is not without its whimsical and unexpected intersections.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and Accenture's stock price (ACN). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Meat-ing the Market: A Correlational Analysis of US Household Spending on Animal Proteins and Accenture's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper seeks to investigate the curious relationship between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock performance of Accenture (ACN). Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), a thorough analysis spanning the period from 2002 to 2022 was conducted. The findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9610203, with a p-value of less than 0.01, thus indicating a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This paper elucidates the implications of such a correlation, pondering whether investment in animal proteins may hold the key to predicting Accenture's stock trajectory. It also invites further exploration into the whimsical world of market influences, where even the cluck of a chicken or the splash of a fish may hold sway over stock prices.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of investment is a complex and enigmatic realm, where the rise and fall of stock prices seem to dance to an invisible tune, influenced by an array of factors, both rational and obscure. While traditional analyses tend to focus on economic indicators, market trends, and company performance, there may be unexpected connections lurking beneath the surface. Our study delves into the uncharted territory of household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs, and its potential link to the stock price of Accenture, a global professional services company.
The premise of our investigation may seem, at first glance, as incongruous as a chicken wearing a tuxedo, but as the data unfurls before us, an intriguing pattern emerges. We retraced our steps through over two decades of data, crunching numbers with the precision of a sushi chef slicing sashimi, and the results were astonishing. The correlation coefficient of 0.9610203 between annual US household spending on animal proteins and Accenture's stock price not only raised eyebrows but also prompted us to reflect on the peculiar interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains.
As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, it is paramount to consider the potential implications of our findings. Could a carnivorous culinary inclination be a harbinger of stock market movements? Is there a surreal, symbiotic relationship between the sizzle of a steak and the ascent of a stock price? While the notion may initially provoke a chuckle or an arched eyebrow, it behooves us to delve deeper into the whimsical realm of market dynamics.
Stay tuned as we dissect the data, draw nuanced parallels, and, dare I say, relish in the uncanny correlation between protein-packed purchases and stock market swings. The findings of this study may not only add a dash of humor to the world of economics but also unveil a meaty revelation concealed within the labyrinth of market forces. After all, in the market's menu of influences, who's to say that a well-marbled steak isn't as potent as a fiscal report?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study was as meticulous as a surgeon's hand and as comprehensive as a seafood buffet. Data on annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs was extracted from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, encompassing the years 2002 to 2022. The utilization of this extensive timespan allowed for a panoramic view of consumer behavior across various economic climates, akin to surveying a school of fish as they navigate changing currents.

Furthermore, stock price data for Accenture (ACN) during the same period was sourced from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), ensuring a robust and reliable foundation for our analysis. This wealth of data was then scrutinized with the attentiveness of a butcher examining cuts of meat, taking care to identify any skew or anomaly that could taint the results.

To ascertain the relationship between household spending on animal proteins and Accenture's stock price, a correlation analysis was conducted with the precision of a needle threading through the eye of a financial needle. The robustness of this analysis was bolstered by its ability to capture both quantitative and qualitative nuances, akin to savoring the layered flavors of a delicately prepared dish.

While the precise statistical methodologies employed shall remain veiled, rest assured that they were as intricate as the patterns in a marbled steak, providing a rigorous framework to unearth any underlying associations between these seemingly disparate variables. Amidst the maze of data points and market fluctuations, our approach cut through the noise like a well-sharpened fillet knife, allowing the true relationship between meaty expenditures and stock performance to rise to the surface.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and Accenture's stock price (ACN). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9610203, r-squared of 0.9235601, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Meat-ing the Market: A Correlational Analysis of US Household Spending on Animal Proteins and Accenture's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper seeks to investigate the curious relationship between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock performance of Accenture (ACN). Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), a thorough analysis spanning the period from 2002 to 2022 was conducted. The findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9610203, with a p-value of less than 0.01, thus indicating a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This paper elucidates the implications of such a correlation, pondering whether investment in animal proteins may hold the key to predicting Accenture's stock trajectory. It also invites further exploration into the whimsical world of market influences, where even the cluck of a chicken or the splash of a fish may hold sway over stock prices.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of investment is a complex and enigmatic realm, where the rise and fall of stock prices seem to dance to an invisible tune, influenced by an array of factors, both rational and obscure. While traditional analyses tend to focus on economic indicators, market trends, and company performance, there may be unexpected connections lurking beneath the surface. Our study delves into the uncharted territory of household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs, and its potential link to the stock price of Accenture, a global professional services company.
The premise of our investigation may seem, at first glance, as incongruous as a chicken wearing a tuxedo, but as the data unfurls before us, an intriguing pattern emerges. We retraced our steps through over two decades of data, crunching numbers with the precision of a sushi chef slicing sashimi, and the results were astonishing. The correlation coefficient of 0.9610203 between annual US household spending on animal proteins and Accenture's stock price not only raised eyebrows but also prompted us to reflect on the peculiar interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains.
As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, it is paramount to consider the potential implications of our findings. Could a carnivorous culinary inclination be a harbinger of stock market movements? Is there a surreal, symbiotic relationship between the sizzle of a steak and the ascent of a stock price? While the notion may initially provoke a chuckle or an arched eyebrow, it behooves us to delve deeper into the whimsical realm of market dynamics.
Stay tuned as we dissect the data, draw nuanced parallels, and, dare I say, relish in the uncanny correlation between protein-packed purchases and stock market swings. The findings of this study may not only add a dash of humor to the world of economics but also unveil a meaty revelation concealed within the labyrinth of market forces. After all, in the market's menu of influences, who's to say that a well-marbled steak isn't as potent as a fiscal report?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our study revealed a striking correlation between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and Accenture's (ACN) stock price over the 20-year period from 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9610203 indicated a remarkably strong positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. This robust correlation coefficient raises questions that may make both economists and meat enthusiasts pause for a second glance.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9235601 suggests that approximately 92.35% of the variability in Accenture's stock price can be explained by the variation in annual US household spending on animal proteins. This finding underscores the substantive influence of meat, poultry, fish, and eggs on the fluctuations in ACN stock price, perhaps prompting investors to consider adding a side of bacon to their portfolio.

Importantly, the p-value of less than 0.01 highlights the statistically significant nature of this correlation, indicating that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by random chance is exceedingly low. This notable result underscores the need to delve deeper into the hidden dynamics of market influences, where the cluck of a chicken or the sizzle of a steak may hold more sway over stock prices than previously thought.

The figure (Fig. 1) illustrates the pronounced correlation between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and Accenture's stock price, providing a visual representation of the compelling relationship unearthed in this study. This correlation may spark further research into the unexpected interplay between consumer spending habits and stock market dynamics, adding a flavorful twist to the multifaceted world of economics and finance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and Accenture's stock price (ACN). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Meat-ing the Market: A Correlational Analysis of US Household Spending on Animal Proteins and Accenture's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper seeks to investigate the curious relationship between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock performance of Accenture (ACN). Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), a thorough analysis spanning the period from 2002 to 2022 was conducted. The findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9610203, with a p-value of less than 0.01, thus indicating a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This paper elucidates the implications of such a correlation, pondering whether investment in animal proteins may hold the key to predicting Accenture's stock trajectory. It also invites further exploration into the whimsical world of market influences, where even the cluck of a chicken or the splash of a fish may hold sway over stock prices.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs has traditionally been a matter of sustenance and culinary preference. The confluence of economic factors, consumer behavior, and dietary habits underscores the significance of protein acquisition within the realm of household expenditures. Such a dynamic landscape prompts exploration into potential ramifications on financial markets, including the stock price performance of global entities such as Accenture.
On a related note, Doe's study underscores the multifaceted nature of consumer choices in the realm of protein consumption. The intricate interplay between dietary preferences, socio-economic status, and market trends offers an intriguing backdrop for our investigation into the correlation between household spending on animal proteins and stock prices. The findings of this study shed light on the intricate tapestry of consumer behavior and its potential reverberations in the domain of financial markets.
Moreover, Jones' research delves into the psychological underpinnings of consumer decision-making processes, particularly in the context of food choices. The nuanced interplay between perception, desire, and economic considerations within the sphere of protein purchases introduces an additional layer of complexity to our exploration.
Turning to the realm of literature, "Economics of Food and Agricultural Markets" and "The History of Food" present comprehensive analyses of consumer behavior in the context of food procurement. While not directly addressing our specific inquiry, these works offer valuable insights into the complexities of food-related preferences and their broader societal implications.
In a slightly more whimsical vein, the inclusion of "The Joy of Cooking" and "Like Water for Chocolate" in our literary landscape provides a nod to the intricate relationship between culinary arts and human experience. While these works may not directly underpin our investigation, they serve as a delightful reminder of the multifaceted nature of food and its potential influences on various facets of life, including economic phenomena.
Venturing into the realm of cinematic musings, the movies "Babette's Feast" and "Big Night" provide vivid portrayals of the significance of culinary experiences. While not directly linked to our examination of household spending on animal proteins and stock prices, these films offer a cinematic feast for the senses, inviting contemplation on the diverse influences of gastronomic pursuits.
Overall, the literature and cultural references surrounding the domains of food, consumer behavior, and culinary arts offer a rich backdrop for our exploration of the intriguing correlation between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock performance of Accenture. As we delve further into our analysis, it becomes evident that the realm of economics and market forces is not without its whimsical and unexpected intersections.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study revealed a striking correlation between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and Accenture's (ACN) stock price over the 20-year period from 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9610203 indicated a remarkably strong positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. This robust correlation coefficient raises questions that may make both economists and meat enthusiasts pause for a second glance.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9235601 suggests that approximately 92.35% of the variability in Accenture's stock price can be explained by the variation in annual US household spending on animal proteins. This finding underscores the substantive influence of meat, poultry, fish, and eggs on the fluctuations in ACN stock price, perhaps prompting investors to consider adding a side of bacon to their portfolio.
Importantly, the p-value of less than 0.01 highlights the statistically significant nature of this correlation, indicating that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by random chance is exceedingly low. This notable result underscores the need to delve deeper into the hidden dynamics of market influences, where the cluck of a chicken or the sizzle of a steak may hold more sway over stock prices than previously thought.
The figure (Fig. 1) illustrates the pronounced correlation between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and Accenture's stock price, providing a visual representation of the compelling relationship unearthed in this study. This correlation may spark further research into the unexpected interplay between consumer spending habits and stock market dynamics, adding a flavorful twist to the multifaceted world of economics and finance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study offer substantial support for the prior research, particularly the curious implications observed through the lens of gastronomy and economics. In congruence with the previously cited works of Smith et al., Doe, and Jones, our analysis substantiates the intricate interplay between dietary choices and economic patterns. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9610203 aligns with the existing literature's recognition of the multifaceted nature of consumer behavior and its potential impact on financial indicators. It appears that the cluck of a chicken, the splash of a fish, and the sizzle of a steak may indeed hold intriguing power over the stock market, much to the amusement of both economists and culinary enthusiasts.

The r-squared value of 0.9235601 further bolsters the relevance of our findings, echoing the acknowledgment of meat, poultry, fish, and eggs as substantial influencers in the undulating tides of stock prices. This aligns with the broader understanding of consumer spending as a pivotal driver of economic dynamics, with our study shedding light on the previously underexplored domain of animal protein purchases as a potential harbinger of stock performance. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 accentuates the compelling nature of this correlation, signaling a departure from conventional market analyses and inviting a more nuanced consideration of culinary influences in investment decisions.

Thus, our results serve as a testament to the unexpected intersections between gastronomic pursuits and market forces, reminding us that the economic world is replete with flavorful surprises. As we contemplate the potential interplay between household spending on animal proteins and stock price movements, we are beckoned to delve further into the delightful complexities that underpin our understanding of market influences. This study not only expands the scope of economic inquiry but also infuses a dash of whimsy into the otherwise serious landscape of financial analyses.

In sum, the correlation between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and Accenture's stock price offers a captivating avenue for future exploration, beckoning both scholars and investors to consider the savory implications of protein purchases on market trends. The endearing peculiarity of this correlation prompts a reevaluation of the customary boundaries of market influences, ushering in a refreshing perspective that embraces the unexpected and the delectable in economic analyses.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and Accenture's stock price (ACN). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Meat-ing the Market: A Correlational Analysis of US Household Spending on Animal Proteins and Accenture's Stock Price

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper seeks to investigate the curious relationship between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock performance of Accenture (ACN). Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), a thorough analysis spanning the period from 2002 to 2022 was conducted. The findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9610203, with a p-value of less than 0.01, thus indicating a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This paper elucidates the implications of such a correlation, pondering whether investment in animal proteins may hold the key to predicting Accenture's stock trajectory. It also invites further exploration into the whimsical world of market influences, where even the cluck of a chicken or the splash of a fish may hold sway over stock prices.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of investment is a complex and enigmatic realm, where the rise and fall of stock prices seem to dance to an invisible tune, influenced by an array of factors, both rational and obscure. While traditional analyses tend to focus on economic indicators, market trends, and company performance, there may be unexpected connections lurking beneath the surface. Our study delves into the uncharted territory of household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs, and its potential link to the stock price of Accenture, a global professional services company.
The premise of our investigation may seem, at first glance, as incongruous as a chicken wearing a tuxedo, but as the data unfurls before us, an intriguing pattern emerges. We retraced our steps through over two decades of data, crunching numbers with the precision of a sushi chef slicing sashimi, and the results were astonishing. The correlation coefficient of 0.9610203 between annual US household spending on animal proteins and Accenture's stock price not only raised eyebrows but also prompted us to reflect on the peculiar interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated domains.
As we embark on this scholarly endeavor, it is paramount to consider the potential implications of our findings. Could a carnivorous culinary inclination be a harbinger of stock market movements? Is there a surreal, symbiotic relationship between the sizzle of a steak and the ascent of a stock price? While the notion may initially provoke a chuckle or an arched eyebrow, it behooves us to delve deeper into the whimsical realm of market dynamics.
Stay tuned as we dissect the data, draw nuanced parallels, and, dare I say, relish in the uncanny correlation between protein-packed purchases and stock market swings. The findings of this study may not only add a dash of humor to the world of economics but also unveil a meaty revelation concealed within the labyrinth of market forces. After all, in the market's menu of influences, who's to say that a well-marbled steak isn't as potent as a fiscal report?

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our study revealed a striking correlation between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and Accenture's (ACN) stock price over the 20-year period from 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9610203 indicated a remarkably strong positive relationship between these two seemingly disparate variables. This robust correlation coefficient raises questions that may make both economists and meat enthusiasts pause for a second glance.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9235601 suggests that approximately 92.35% of the variability in Accenture's stock price can be explained by the variation in annual US household spending on animal proteins. This finding underscores the substantive influence of meat, poultry, fish, and eggs on the fluctuations in ACN stock price, perhaps prompting investors to consider adding a side of bacon to their portfolio.
Importantly, the p-value of less than 0.01 highlights the statistically significant nature of this correlation, indicating that the likelihood of such a strong relationship occurring by random chance is exceedingly low. This notable result underscores the need to delve deeper into the hidden dynamics of market influences, where the cluck of a chicken or the sizzle of a steak may hold more sway over stock prices than previously thought.
The figure (Fig. 1) illustrates the pronounced correlation between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and Accenture's stock price, providing a visual representation of the compelling relationship unearthed in this study. This correlation may spark further research into the unexpected interplay between consumer spending habits and stock market dynamics, adding a flavorful twist to the multifaceted world of economics and finance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has elucidated a remarkably robust correlation between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and Accenture's (ACN) stock price. This unexpected interplay between carnivorous consumer habits and stock market fluctuations highlights the need to consider influences beyond traditional economic indicators. The remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9610203, with a p-value of less than 0.01, presents a tantalizing puzzle for economists to digest, akin to a well-seasoned stew with just a dash of statistical significance.

The findings of this study may serve as a sizzling reminder that market influences, much like a marinade, can be a delightful mixture of the predictable and the enigmatic. Perhaps it is time for investment strategists to ponder whether a prime ribeye might hold the key to understanding stock market movements, or if a surge in consumer spending on eggs is an omen for a bullish market. As we reflect on these curious correlations, it behooves us to acknowledge the potential impact of seemingly mundane choices on the ebbs and flows of the stock market, adding a pinch of irony to the economic landscape.

The r-squared value of 0.9235601 further underscores the substantive influence of consumer spending on animal proteins on the variability in Accenture's stock price, reminding us that the meat of the matter may hold more weight than previously imagined. It seems that the sizzle of a steak on the grill may reverberate beyond the confines of barbecue gatherings, leaving its imprint on the intricate dance of stock prices.

In light of these compelling findings, it may be time for investors to pay closer attention to the grocery carts of households, where the contents may hold subtle clues to the trajectory of stock prices. This study invites further exploration into the curious connections that lace the fabric of market dynamics, compelling scholars and investors alike to ponder whether the cluck of a chicken or the swirl of a fish may, indeed, hold more sway over financial markets than expected.

In the realm of statistical significance and culinary correlations, it is tempting to contemplate the potential for a carnivorous crystal ball dictating stock trajectories, or the notion that a chicken breast may herald more than just a hearty meal. However, it must be noted that correlation does not imply causation, and further research is needed to unravel the nuanced intricacies of these associations. Nonetheless, it is our firm conviction that no more research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Meat-ing the Market: A Correlational Analysis of US Household Spending on Animal Proteins and Accenture's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Gastronomics and Finance


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Meat-ing the Market: A Correlational Analysis of US Household Spending on Animal Proteins and Accenture's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Gastronomic Economics and Financial Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Meat-ing the Market: A Correlational Analysis of US Household Spending on Animal Proteins and Accenture's Stock Price with an abstract of This paper seeks to investigate the curious relationship between annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs and the stock performance of Accenture (ACN). Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), a thorough analysis spanning the period from 2002 to 2022 was conducted. The findings revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.9610203, with a p-value of less than 0.01, thus indicating a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This paper elucidates the implications of such a correlation, pondering whether investment in animal proteins may hold the key to predicting Accenture's stock trajectory. It also invites further exploration into the whimsical world of market influences, where even the cluck of a chicken or the splash of a fish may hold sway over stock prices.

ChatGPT:

US household spending, animal proteins, meat consumption, poultry spending, fish and eggs expenditure, Accenture stock price, stock performance correlation, Bureau of Labor Statistics, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv data, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, market influences, investment implications

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs
Detailed data title: Average annual household spend on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs

Accenture's stock price (ACN)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Accenture (ACN) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Accenture's stock price (ACN)

Correlation r = 0.9610203 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9235601 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Accenture's stock price (ACN)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.6E-12. 0.0000000000046127778124886404
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 4.6E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 216,789,110,738 random variables You don't actually need 216 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.9, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs (Household spend)798825880764797777846841784832852856892896890944961980107511151216
Accenture's stock price (ACN) (Stock price)26.91826.1526.9528.8436.5536.3832.5441.5248.6653.9267.5981.589.67102.62117.38153.5138.93210.86261414.66




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,237 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 636,906,169 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([798,825,880,764,797,777,846,841,784,832,852,856,892,896,890,944,961,980,1075,1115,1216,])
array_2 = np.array([26.9,18,26.15,26.95,28.84,36.55,36.38,32.54,41.52,48.66,53.92,67.59,81.5,89.67,102.62,117.38,153.5,138.93,210.86,261,414.66,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on meats, poultry, fish, and eggs"
array_2_name = "Accenture's stock price (ACN)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 7199 · Black Variable ID: 19888 · Red Variable ID: 1577
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0