about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #6,048 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of bill collectors in California and the second variable is Robberies in the US.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image

AI explanation

As the number of bill collectors in California decreased, there was a corresponding decrease in the amount of aggressive phone calls being made. This led to a reduction in overall stress levels across the state, as people no longer had to constantly dodge calls from debt collectors. With Californians feeling less on edge, there was a ripple effect across the country, leading to a decrease in general tension. As a result, potential robbers found that people were less likely to react with aggression or panic, making the prospect of committing a robbery less appealing. In essence, the lack of persistent bill collectors in California created a domino effect that ultimately contributed to a decrease in robberies nationwide.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a serene California landscape with bill collectors' phone calls represented by dark, tense cloud formations dissipating into peaceful, clear skies. As the calmness spreads, showcase the reduction of tension across the country through a visual transition from tense, edgy environments to tranquil scenes. Depict potential robbers encountering less reactive and panic-prone targets, symbolizing the decrease in nationwide robberies. This visual should exude a hyper-realistic ambiance, communicating the profound impact of reduced aggression and tension. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of bill collectors in California and Robberies in the US. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic Pop art Hyper-realistic Art nouveau Parallax art
ChatGPT: Hyper-realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of bill collectors in California and Robberies in the US, in the following situation: As the number of bill collectors in California decreased, there was a corresponding decrease in the amount of aggressive phone calls being made. This led to a reduction in overall stress levels across the state, as people no longer had to constantly dodge calls from debt collectors. With Californians feeling less on edge, there was a ripple effect across the country, leading to a decrease in general tension. As a result, potential robbers found that people were less likely to react with aggression or panic, making the prospect of committing a robbery less appealing. In essence, the lack of persistent bill collectors in California created a domino effect that ultimately contributed to a decrease in robberies nationwide.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In California, fewer bill collectors meant fewer aggressive phone calls. The state felt less tense as a result. This calmness spread across the country, reducing overall tension. With people less on edge, potential robbers found their targets less likely to react aggressively or panic. This led to a decrease in robberies nationwide.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Hyper-realistic ] and depicting this scene: In California, fewer bill collectors meant fewer aggressive phone calls. The state felt less tense as a result. This calmness spread across the country, reducing overall tension. With people less on edge, potential robbers found their targets less likely to react aggressively or panic. This led to a decrease in robberies nationwide. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a serene California landscape with bill collectors' phone calls represented by dark, tense cloud formations dissipating into peaceful, clear skies. As the calmness spreads, showcase the reduction of tension across the country through a visual transition from tense, edgy environments to tranquil scenes. Depict potential robbers encountering less reactive and panic-prone targets, symbolizing the decrease in nationwide robberies. This visual should exude a hyper-realistic ambiance, communicating the profound impact of reduced aggression and tension.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of bill collectors in California caused Robberies in the US to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Bill Collector Effect: Do More Debt Chasers Lead to More Cases of Safe Robbery Races?

Journal of Unconventional Socioeconomic Research

Jan 2024
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bill collectors in California and Robberies in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9091146 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Bill Collector Effect: Do More Debt Chasers Lead to More Cases of Safe Robbery Races?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 2003 to 2022, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9091146 and a significance level (p) of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a strong positive association between the two variables, indicating that an increase in the number of bill collectors in California is associated with a rise in the number of robberies nationwide.

While the traditional perspective may attribute this correlation to economic factors, our research digs deeper to uncover the intricate dynamic between debt collection and criminal activities. Our results, though surprising, provide compelling evidence for a potential indirect effect of persistent collection calls on the perpetration of property crimes.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the curious correlation between debt collection activities in the Golden State and larcenous incidents across the country. However, further research is warranted to understand the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected relationship and to explore the potential implications for crime prevention strategies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bill collectors in California and Robberies in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Bill Collector Effect: Do More Debt Chasers Lead to More Cases of Safe Robbery Races?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 2003 to 2022, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9091146 and a significance level (p) of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a strong positive association between the two variables, indicating that an increase in the number of bill collectors in California is associated with a rise in the number of robberies nationwide.

While the traditional perspective may attribute this correlation to economic factors, our research digs deeper to uncover the intricate dynamic between debt collection and criminal activities. Our results, though surprising, provide compelling evidence for a potential indirect effect of persistent collection calls on the perpetration of property crimes.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the curious correlation between debt collection activities in the Golden State and larcenous incidents across the country. However, further research is warranted to understand the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected relationship and to explore the potential implications for crime prevention strategies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between debt collection practices in California and the occurrence of robberies in the United States has long been a topic of interest among researchers and policymakers. While the connection may seem tenuous at first glance, our study delves into the entangled web of debt chasing and criminal behavior to uncover the potential impact of persistent bill collectors on the incidence of property crimes.

The state of California, often renowned for its golden sunshine and picturesque coastlines, also boasts a robust debt collection industry. As the land of opportunity for both debtors and creditors, California provides a fertile ground for investigating the curious link between the tenacious pursuit of outstanding debts and the perpetration of safe robberies.

Despite being overshadowed by more conventional factors such as economic inequality and demographic shifts, the influence of debt collection activities on the prevalence of robberies has not escaped our discerning gaze. While this association may seem far-fetched to the uninitiated, our investigation peels back the layers of this peculiar relationship to offer a fresh perspective on the intersection of consumer debt and criminal mischief.

As we embark on this analytical journey, the intriguing interplay between bill collectors and burglars unravels before us, presenting a conundrum that beckons for further exploration. Our endeavor seeks to illuminate this uncharted terrain and uncover the hidden connections between these seemingly disparate domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bill collectors in California and Robberies in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Bill Collector Effect: Do More Debt Chasers Lead to More Cases of Safe Robbery Races?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 2003 to 2022, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9091146 and a significance level (p) of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a strong positive association between the two variables, indicating that an increase in the number of bill collectors in California is associated with a rise in the number of robberies nationwide.

While the traditional perspective may attribute this correlation to economic factors, our research digs deeper to uncover the intricate dynamic between debt collection and criminal activities. Our results, though surprising, provide compelling evidence for a potential indirect effect of persistent collection calls on the perpetration of property crimes.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the curious correlation between debt collection activities in the Golden State and larcenous incidents across the country. However, further research is warranted to understand the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected relationship and to explore the potential implications for crime prevention strategies.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between debt collection practices in California and the occurrence of robberies in the United States has long been a topic of interest among researchers and policymakers. While the connection may seem tenuous at first glance, our study delves into the entangled web of debt chasing and criminal behavior to uncover the potential impact of persistent bill collectors on the incidence of property crimes.
The state of California, often renowned for its golden sunshine and picturesque coastlines, also boasts a robust debt collection industry. As the land of opportunity for both debtors and creditors, California provides a fertile ground for investigating the curious link between the tenacious pursuit of outstanding debts and the perpetration of safe robberies.
Despite being overshadowed by more conventional factors such as economic inequality and demographic shifts, the influence of debt collection activities on the prevalence of robberies has not escaped our discerning gaze. While this association may seem far-fetched to the uninitiated, our investigation peels back the layers of this peculiar relationship to offer a fresh perspective on the intersection of consumer debt and criminal mischief.
As we embark on this analytical journey, the intriguing interplay between bill collectors and burglars unravels before us, presenting a conundrum that beckons for further exploration. Our endeavor seeks to illuminate this uncharted terrain and uncover the hidden connections between these seemingly disparate domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

This literature review presents a comprehensive analysis of the existing research on the connection between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States. The authors have scoured a range of scholarly articles, government reports, and statistical analyses to provide a thorough understanding of this intriguing association.

Smith (2015) explores the economic ramifications of debt collection practices and their potential link to property crimes. Doe (2017) examines the sociological underpinnings of debt-related stress and its effects on criminal behavior, while Jones (2019) investigates the geographical distribution of debt collection agencies and their correlation with regional crime rates.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "Debtocracy" by Papadimitriou and Caffentzis (2011) offers a critical examination of debt collection practices and their impact on societal well-being. Similarly, "The Economics of Crime" by Becker (1968) provides a theoretical framework for understanding the relationship between economic activities and criminal behavior.

In the realm of fiction, works such as "The Debt Collector" by Amanda Hocking and "The Robbery" by Doug Magee (2006) provide fictional accounts that, while not directly related to the subject matter, underscore the enduring fascination with debt and crime in popular culture.

Further broadening the scope, the authors have also conducted an unconventional review, drawing insights from sources such as mundane Ancient Aliens episodes, IKEA assembly instructions, and even the cryptic hieroglyphics of CVS receipts. While these sources may appear tangential at first glance, their diverse perspectives have enriched the authors' understanding of the complex interplay between debt collection activities and larcenous inclinations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bill collectors in California and Robberies in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Bill Collector Effect: Do More Debt Chasers Lead to More Cases of Safe Robbery Races?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 2003 to 2022, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9091146 and a significance level (p) of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a strong positive association between the two variables, indicating that an increase in the number of bill collectors in California is associated with a rise in the number of robberies nationwide.

While the traditional perspective may attribute this correlation to economic factors, our research digs deeper to uncover the intricate dynamic between debt collection and criminal activities. Our results, though surprising, provide compelling evidence for a potential indirect effect of persistent collection calls on the perpetration of property crimes.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the curious correlation between debt collection activities in the Golden State and larcenous incidents across the country. However, further research is warranted to understand the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected relationship and to explore the potential implications for crime prevention strategies.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between debt collection practices in California and the occurrence of robberies in the United States has long been a topic of interest among researchers and policymakers. While the connection may seem tenuous at first glance, our study delves into the entangled web of debt chasing and criminal behavior to uncover the potential impact of persistent bill collectors on the incidence of property crimes.
The state of California, often renowned for its golden sunshine and picturesque coastlines, also boasts a robust debt collection industry. As the land of opportunity for both debtors and creditors, California provides a fertile ground for investigating the curious link between the tenacious pursuit of outstanding debts and the perpetration of safe robberies.
Despite being overshadowed by more conventional factors such as economic inequality and demographic shifts, the influence of debt collection activities on the prevalence of robberies has not escaped our discerning gaze. While this association may seem far-fetched to the uninitiated, our investigation peels back the layers of this peculiar relationship to offer a fresh perspective on the intersection of consumer debt and criminal mischief.
As we embark on this analytical journey, the intriguing interplay between bill collectors and burglars unravels before us, presenting a conundrum that beckons for further exploration. Our endeavor seeks to illuminate this uncharted terrain and uncover the hidden connections between these seemingly disparate domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The present study employed a rigorous methodology to examine the correlation between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States. Data on the number of bill collectors in California were obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, while the incidence of robberies in the United States was derived from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. The data spanned from 2003 to 2022, providing a comprehensive timeframe for the investigation of the relationship between these variables.

To establish the association between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States, a series of statistical analyses were conducted. Firstly, a Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between the two variables. The analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9091146, indicating a strong positive association between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States.

Furthermore, a significance test was performed to assess the probability of obtaining such a strong correlation coefficient by random chance. The p-value obtained was less than 0.01, indicating that the observed relationship is statistically significant. This provides compelling evidence for the presence of a meaningful association between the variables under investigation.

In addition to the quantitative analyses, a thorough review of existing literature on debt collection practices and crime trends was conducted to contextualize the findings within the broader scholarly discourse. This comprehensive approach allowed for a nuanced interpretation of the results and provided valuable insights into the potential mechanisms underlying the observed association.

Moreover, to ensure the robustness and reliability of the findings, sensitivity analyses were conducted to examine the stability of the observed relationship across different time periods and subpopulations. These supplementary analyses confirmed the consistency of the association between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States, further strengthening the validity of the study's conclusions.

Overall, the study's methodology combined quantitative analyses with a comprehensive review of the literature to provide a rigorous investigation of the relationship between debt collection activities in California and property crimes across the United States. The findings underscore the importance of considering unconventional factors in the study of criminal behavior and offer new insights into the complex interplay between debt collection practices and societal dynamics.

The above approach, though dry, is intended to illustrate the thorough and detailed methodology employed in the investigation of the relationship between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bill collectors in California and Robberies in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9091146, r-squared of 0.8264893, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Bill Collector Effect: Do More Debt Chasers Lead to More Cases of Safe Robbery Races?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 2003 to 2022, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9091146 and a significance level (p) of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a strong positive association between the two variables, indicating that an increase in the number of bill collectors in California is associated with a rise in the number of robberies nationwide.

While the traditional perspective may attribute this correlation to economic factors, our research digs deeper to uncover the intricate dynamic between debt collection and criminal activities. Our results, though surprising, provide compelling evidence for a potential indirect effect of persistent collection calls on the perpetration of property crimes.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the curious correlation between debt collection activities in the Golden State and larcenous incidents across the country. However, further research is warranted to understand the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected relationship and to explore the potential implications for crime prevention strategies.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between debt collection practices in California and the occurrence of robberies in the United States has long been a topic of interest among researchers and policymakers. While the connection may seem tenuous at first glance, our study delves into the entangled web of debt chasing and criminal behavior to uncover the potential impact of persistent bill collectors on the incidence of property crimes.
The state of California, often renowned for its golden sunshine and picturesque coastlines, also boasts a robust debt collection industry. As the land of opportunity for both debtors and creditors, California provides a fertile ground for investigating the curious link between the tenacious pursuit of outstanding debts and the perpetration of safe robberies.
Despite being overshadowed by more conventional factors such as economic inequality and demographic shifts, the influence of debt collection activities on the prevalence of robberies has not escaped our discerning gaze. While this association may seem far-fetched to the uninitiated, our investigation peels back the layers of this peculiar relationship to offer a fresh perspective on the intersection of consumer debt and criminal mischief.
As we embark on this analytical journey, the intriguing interplay between bill collectors and burglars unravels before us, presenting a conundrum that beckons for further exploration. Our endeavor seeks to illuminate this uncharted terrain and uncover the hidden connections between these seemingly disparate domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services revealed a notable correlation between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States. Over the period from 2003 to 2022, a correlation coefficient of 0.9091146 was calculated, with an r-squared value of 0.8264893 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between the two variables.

Through rigorous statistical analysis, our study provides empirical evidence of a compelling relationship between the abundance of debt chasers in the sunshine state and the occurrences of robberies across the nation. It appears that the pursuit of outstanding debts in California may indeed play a role in the perpetration of property crimes in other parts of the country, unveiling a surprising connection between financial pressures and criminal activities.

The scatterplot presented in Figure 1 depicts the strong association observed between the number of bill collectors in California and the frequency of robberies in the United States, further bolstering the robustness of our findings. The upward trend displayed in the graph visually underscores the intriguing link between the dogged pursuit of debtors and the incidences of larcenous activities, illustrating a curious dynamic that defies conventional wisdom.

These results, though unexpected, offer valuable insights into the unexplored relationship between debt collection practices and criminal behavior. While the causal mechanisms underlying this association warrant further investigation, our study sets the stage for a nuanced understanding of the intricate interplay between financial pressures and illicit activities.

In summary, our findings shed light on the enigmatic correlation between the activities of debt collectors in California and the perpetration of property crimes nationwide, challenging established perceptions and paving the way for future research to unravel the complexities of this intriguing nexus.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bill collectors in California and Robberies in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Bill Collector Effect: Do More Debt Chasers Lead to More Cases of Safe Robbery Races?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 2003 to 2022, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9091146 and a significance level (p) of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a strong positive association between the two variables, indicating that an increase in the number of bill collectors in California is associated with a rise in the number of robberies nationwide.

While the traditional perspective may attribute this correlation to economic factors, our research digs deeper to uncover the intricate dynamic between debt collection and criminal activities. Our results, though surprising, provide compelling evidence for a potential indirect effect of persistent collection calls on the perpetration of property crimes.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the curious correlation between debt collection activities in the Golden State and larcenous incidents across the country. However, further research is warranted to understand the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected relationship and to explore the potential implications for crime prevention strategies.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
This literature review presents a comprehensive analysis of the existing research on the connection between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States. The authors have scoured a range of scholarly articles, government reports, and statistical analyses to provide a thorough understanding of this intriguing association.
Smith (2015) explores the economic ramifications of debt collection practices and their potential link to property crimes. Doe (2017) examines the sociological underpinnings of debt-related stress and its effects on criminal behavior, while Jones (2019) investigates the geographical distribution of debt collection agencies and their correlation with regional crime rates.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "Debtocracy" by Papadimitriou and Caffentzis (2011) offers a critical examination of debt collection practices and their impact on societal well-being. Similarly, "The Economics of Crime" by Becker (1968) provides a theoretical framework for understanding the relationship between economic activities and criminal behavior.
In the realm of fiction, works such as "The Debt Collector" by Amanda Hocking and "The Robbery" by Doug Magee (2006) provide fictional accounts that, while not directly related to the subject matter, underscore the enduring fascination with debt and crime in popular culture.
Further broadening the scope, the authors have also conducted an unconventional review, drawing insights from sources such as mundane Ancient Aliens episodes, IKEA assembly instructions, and even the cryptic hieroglyphics of CVS receipts. While these sources may appear tangential at first glance, their diverse perspectives have enriched the authors' understanding of the complex interplay between debt collection activities and larcenous inclinations.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services revealed a notable correlation between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States. Over the period from 2003 to 2022, a correlation coefficient of 0.9091146 was calculated, with an r-squared value of 0.8264893 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between the two variables.
Through rigorous statistical analysis, our study provides empirical evidence of a compelling relationship between the abundance of debt chasers in the sunshine state and the occurrences of robberies across the nation. It appears that the pursuit of outstanding debts in California may indeed play a role in the perpetration of property crimes in other parts of the country, unveiling a surprising connection between financial pressures and criminal activities.
The scatterplot presented in Figure 1 depicts the strong association observed between the number of bill collectors in California and the frequency of robberies in the United States, further bolstering the robustness of our findings. The upward trend displayed in the graph visually underscores the intriguing link between the dogged pursuit of debtors and the incidences of larcenous activities, illustrating a curious dynamic that defies conventional wisdom.
These results, though unexpected, offer valuable insights into the unexplored relationship between debt collection practices and criminal behavior. While the causal mechanisms underlying this association warrant further investigation, our study sets the stage for a nuanced understanding of the intricate interplay between financial pressures and illicit activities.
In summary, our findings shed light on the enigmatic correlation between the activities of debt collectors in California and the perpetration of property crimes nationwide, challenging established perceptions and paving the way for future research to unravel the complexities of this intriguing nexus.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of the current study provide compelling evidence for a positive association between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States. Our results align with previous research that has examined the potential links between debt collection activities and criminal behavior. Smith's (2015) work, which delves into the economic ramifications of debt collection practices, is particularly relevant in light of our findings. Similarly, Doe (2017) highlights the sociological underpinnings of debt-related stress and its effects on criminal behavior, offering valuable insights that resonate with the indirect effect of persistent collection calls on property crimes revealed by our study.

The analysis of the data has shown a strong correlation, indicating that as the number of bill collectors in California increases, there is a corresponding rise in the number of robberies nationwide. This unexpected result challenges conventional wisdom and underscores the complex interplay between financial pressures and criminal activities. While this association may seem surprising, it underscores an intriguing dynamic that necessitates further investigation.

In addition to the scholarly work, it is worth acknowledging the unconventional sources cited in the literature review, such as mundane Ancient Aliens episodes and IKEA assembly instructions. While initially seemingly tangential, these sources have enriched our understanding of the intricate relationship between debt collection activities and larcenous inclinations. The cryptic hieroglyphics of CVS receipts, in particular, have contributed to a multifaceted perspective on the subject matter, reflecting the diverse influences that shape our perception of this phenomenon.

The upward trend depicted in the scatterplot visually underscores the intriguing link between the dogged pursuit of debtors and the incidences of larcenous activities. This visual representation poignantly captures the unexpected nature of our findings, challenging established perceptions and paving the way for future research to unravel the complexities of this intriguing nexus.

The current study has practical implications for crime prevention strategies and debt collection practices. Understanding the potential indirect influence of debt collection activities on property crimes can inform interventions aimed at reducing criminal behavior. Moreover, our findings suggest the need for a nuanced approach to debt collection practices and their potential repercussions on societal well-being.

In conclusion, our research sheds light on the enigmatic correlation between the activities of debt collectors in California and the perpetration of property crimes nationwide. The unexpected nature of this association underscores the need for further exploration to untangle the intricate mechanisms driving this curious relationship.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of bill collectors in California and Robberies in the US. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Bill Collector Effect: Do More Debt Chasers Lead to More Cases of Safe Robbery Races?

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the relationship between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 2003 to 2022, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9091146 and a significance level (p) of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a strong positive association between the two variables, indicating that an increase in the number of bill collectors in California is associated with a rise in the number of robberies nationwide.

While the traditional perspective may attribute this correlation to economic factors, our research digs deeper to uncover the intricate dynamic between debt collection and criminal activities. Our results, though surprising, provide compelling evidence for a potential indirect effect of persistent collection calls on the perpetration of property crimes.

In conclusion, our study sheds light on the curious correlation between debt collection activities in the Golden State and larcenous incidents across the country. However, further research is warranted to understand the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected relationship and to explore the potential implications for crime prevention strategies.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between debt collection practices in California and the occurrence of robberies in the United States has long been a topic of interest among researchers and policymakers. While the connection may seem tenuous at first glance, our study delves into the entangled web of debt chasing and criminal behavior to uncover the potential impact of persistent bill collectors on the incidence of property crimes.
The state of California, often renowned for its golden sunshine and picturesque coastlines, also boasts a robust debt collection industry. As the land of opportunity for both debtors and creditors, California provides a fertile ground for investigating the curious link between the tenacious pursuit of outstanding debts and the perpetration of safe robberies.
Despite being overshadowed by more conventional factors such as economic inequality and demographic shifts, the influence of debt collection activities on the prevalence of robberies has not escaped our discerning gaze. While this association may seem far-fetched to the uninitiated, our investigation peels back the layers of this peculiar relationship to offer a fresh perspective on the intersection of consumer debt and criminal mischief.
As we embark on this analytical journey, the intriguing interplay between bill collectors and burglars unravels before us, presenting a conundrum that beckons for further exploration. Our endeavor seeks to illuminate this uncharted terrain and uncover the hidden connections between these seemingly disparate domains.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services revealed a notable correlation between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States. Over the period from 2003 to 2022, a correlation coefficient of 0.9091146 was calculated, with an r-squared value of 0.8264893 and p < 0.01, indicating a strong positive association between the two variables.
Through rigorous statistical analysis, our study provides empirical evidence of a compelling relationship between the abundance of debt chasers in the sunshine state and the occurrences of robberies across the nation. It appears that the pursuit of outstanding debts in California may indeed play a role in the perpetration of property crimes in other parts of the country, unveiling a surprising connection between financial pressures and criminal activities.
The scatterplot presented in Figure 1 depicts the strong association observed between the number of bill collectors in California and the frequency of robberies in the United States, further bolstering the robustness of our findings. The upward trend displayed in the graph visually underscores the intriguing link between the dogged pursuit of debtors and the incidences of larcenous activities, illustrating a curious dynamic that defies conventional wisdom.
These results, though unexpected, offer valuable insights into the unexplored relationship between debt collection practices and criminal behavior. While the causal mechanisms underlying this association warrant further investigation, our study sets the stage for a nuanced understanding of the intricate interplay between financial pressures and illicit activities.
In summary, our findings shed light on the enigmatic correlation between the activities of debt collectors in California and the perpetration of property crimes nationwide, challenging established perceptions and paving the way for future research to unravel the complexities of this intriguing nexus.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has brought to the fore an unexpected and intriguing correlation between the number of bill collectors in California and the occurrences of robberies across the United States. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9091146 and a significance level (p) of less than 0.01 point to a strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables, defying conventional wisdom and leaving us pondering the curious dance between debt collection activities and criminal endeavors.

While the classic perspective might attribute this association to economic motives, our findings challenge this simplistic view and beckon us to explore the convoluted interconnection between the pursuit of outstanding debts and the commission of property crimes. Indeed, it appears that the persistent ringing of debt collectors' phones may set off a chain of events leading to larcenous activities in far-flung corners of the country, painting a picture of clandestine cooperation between creditors and culprits.

Our results, while eyebrow-raising, offer valuable insights into the murky waters of this unexpected relationship, urging us to untangle the web of debt collection and illegal appropriations further. The scatterplot in Figure 1 visually captures this bewildering connection, depicting a rising tide of robberies in tandem with the swelling ranks of bill collectors in the Golden State.

In unraveling this peculiar nexus, we have shed light on an understudied aspect of crime dynamics, but it is evident that further research is indispensable to fully grasp the intricacies of this enigmatic correlation. Hence, we advocate for additional scholarly pursuits to delve deeper into the underlying mechanisms orchestrating the bond between debt collection crusades and the perpetration of safe robberies.

In this vein, the veil shrouding the interplay between debt collection and criminal exploits remains only partially lifted, leaving us tantalizingly close to understanding the clandestine partnership between these seemingly incongruous domains. Nevertheless, for now, we can confidently assert that no further research is warranted in this area, as the mysteries of debt collectors' influence on robberies have been satisfactorily unraveled.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Bill Collector Effect: Do More Debt Chasers Lead to More Cases of Safe Robbery Races?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Unconventional Socioeconomic Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Bill Collector Effect: Do More Debt Chasers Lead to More Cases of Safe Robbery Races?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association for Quirky Economic Research and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Bill Collector Effect: Do More Debt Chasers Lead to More Cases of Safe Robbery Races? with an abstract of This study examines the relationship between the number of bill collectors in California and the incidence of robberies in the United States. Using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services spanning from 2003 to 2022, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9091146 and a significance level (p) of less than 0.01. Our findings suggest a strong positive association between the two variables, indicating that an increase in the number of bill collectors in California is associated with a rise in the number of robberies nationwide.
While the traditional perspective may attribute this correlation to economic factors, our research digs deeper to uncover the intricate dynamic between debt collection and criminal activities. Our results, though surprising, provide compelling evidence for a potential indirect effect of persistent collection calls on the perpetration of property crimes.
In conclusion, our study sheds light on the curious correlation between debt collection activities in the Golden State and larcenous incidents across the country. However, further research is warranted to understand the underlying mechanisms driving this unexpected relationship and to explore the potential implications for crime prevention strategies.

ChatGPT:

bill collectors, debt collectors, California, incidence of robberies, United States, Bureau of Labor Statistics, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, correlation coefficient, significance level, property crimes, debt collection activities, larcenous incidents, crime prevention strategies

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of bill collectors in California
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of bill and account collectors in California
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of bill collectors in California

Robberies in the US
Detailed data title: The robbery rate per 100,000 residents in United States
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Robberies in the US

Correlation r = 0.9091146 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8264893 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Robberies in the US) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of bill collectors in California) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.9E-8. 0.0000000287830686672307540000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 2.9E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 34,742,647 random variables You don't actually need 34 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.78, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of bill collectors in California (Laborers)4677043760454204299043140425804108041500407004028039320386603836036030297002251020350181802218019660
Robberies in the US (Robbery rate)142.5136.7140.8150148.3145.9133.1119.3113.9113.1109101.3102.2102.998.686.181.873.965.566.1




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([46770,43760,45420,42990,43140,42580,41080,41500,40700,40280,39320,38660,38360,36030,29700,22510,20350,18180,22180,19660,])
array_2 = np.array([142.5,136.7,140.8,150,148.3,145.9,133.1,119.3,113.9,113.1,109,101.3,102.2,102.9,98.6,86.1,81.8,73.9,65.5,66.1,])
array_1_name = "The number of bill collectors in California"
array_2_name = "Robberies in the US"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 6048 · Black Variable ID: 5519 · Red Variable ID: 20182
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0