about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #5,900 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Annual US household spending on used cars and the second variable is Solar power generated in Grenada.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As household spending on used cars goes up, more and more families end up with those 70s and 80s classics that come equipped with a solar panel calculator on the dashboard. As these vintage beauties hit the roads, their sun-soaking power contributes to a surge in solar energy production in Grenada, effectively reviving the island's solar power game one retro ride at a time! It's a shining example of how the path to a greener future might just be paved with a whole lot of old wheels and solar deals!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a quaint suburban street lined with neatly parked classic 70s and 80s cars, each adorned with a sleek retro solar panel on their dashboards. The sun's radiant rays beam down on the cars, highlighting the solar panels and casting a warm glow over the neighborhood. In the background, a futuristic energy collection station can be seen, capturing the solar power generated by the vintage cars and contributing to the surge in solar energy production in Grenada. The scene evokes a sense of harmonious coexistence between the nostalgic charm of old automobiles and the innovative advancement of solar technology. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on used cars and Solar power generated in Grenada. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Macabre Psychedelic Oragami Minimalism Sci-fi fantacy
ChatGPT: Sci-fi fantasy

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on used cars and Solar power generated in Grenada, in the following situation: As household spending on used cars goes up, more and more families end up with those 70s and 80s classics that come equipped with a solar panel calculator on the dashboard. As these vintage beauties hit the roads, their sun-soaking power contributes to a surge in solar energy production in Grenada, effectively reviving the island's solar power game one retro ride at a time! It's a shining example of how the path to a greener future might just be paved with a whole lot of old wheels and solar deals!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Picture a neighborhood street filled with classic 70s and 80s cars parked in driveways, each equipped with a retro solar panel on the dashboard. The sun's rays power up the solar panels, contributing to a surge in solar energy production in Grenada. This scene illustrates the connection between the increase in annual US household spending on used cars and the rise in solar power generated in Grenada.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Sci-fi fantasy ] and depicting this scene: Picture a neighborhood street filled with classic 70s and 80s cars parked in driveways, each equipped with a retro solar panel on the dashboard. The sun's rays power up the solar panels, contributing to a surge in solar energy production in Grenada. This scene illustrates the connection between the increase in annual US household spending on used cars and the rise in solar power generated in Grenada. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a quaint suburban street lined with neatly parked classic 70s and 80s cars, each adorned with a sleek retro solar panel on their dashboards. The sun's radiant rays beam down on the cars, highlighting the solar panels and casting a warm glow over the neighborhood. In the background, a futuristic energy collection station can be seen, capturing the solar power generated by the vintage cars and contributing to the surge in solar energy production in Grenada. The scene evokes a sense of harmonious coexistence between the nostalgic charm of old automobiles and the innovative advancement of solar technology.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Annual US household spending on used cars caused Solar power generated in Grenada to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From Exhaust to Electrifying: The Shining Connection between Used Cars and Solar Power

Journal of Eco-Vehicle Innovations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on used cars and Solar power generated in Grenada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9671687 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
From Exhaust to Electrifying: The Shining Connection between Used Cars and Solar Power

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to understanding household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada, one might initially think they have as much in common as a wrench and a sunbeam. However, our research sought to shine a light on the surprising relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Using comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Energy Information Administration, we delved into this puzzling connection and uncovered striking findings.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.9671687 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our study revealed a remarkably strong positive relationship between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in the picturesque Caribbean nation of Grenada. This unexpected link may leave one pondering, "Are households stocking up on used cars to gather more solar power or are they using solar power to charge their new electric cars?"

It's not just arbitrary numbers and calculations—the striking connection between used car spending and solar power may truly ignite curiosity in both the transportation and renewable energy sectors. No longer can we dismiss this relationship as mere coincidence; it seems there's an electrifying bond at play here. This study advances our understanding of consumer behavior and renewable energy adoption, shedding light on the unexpected intersections in the modern world.

As the old saying goes, "Why did the used car buy a solar panel? To get a charge out of life!" This research invites further exploration into the unanticipated associations that lurk within the labyrinth of economic variables and consumer preferences. So, let's buckle up and harness the power of the sun—it's time to drive towards a bright, sun-powered future.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on used cars and Solar power generated in Grenada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Exhaust to Electrifying: The Shining Connection between Used Cars and Solar Power

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to understanding household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada, one might initially think they have as much in common as a wrench and a sunbeam. However, our research sought to shine a light on the surprising relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Using comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Energy Information Administration, we delved into this puzzling connection and uncovered striking findings.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.9671687 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our study revealed a remarkably strong positive relationship between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in the picturesque Caribbean nation of Grenada. This unexpected link may leave one pondering, "Are households stocking up on used cars to gather more solar power or are they using solar power to charge their new electric cars?"

It's not just arbitrary numbers and calculations—the striking connection between used car spending and solar power may truly ignite curiosity in both the transportation and renewable energy sectors. No longer can we dismiss this relationship as mere coincidence; it seems there's an electrifying bond at play here. This study advances our understanding of consumer behavior and renewable energy adoption, shedding light on the unexpected intersections in the modern world.

As the old saying goes, "Why did the used car buy a solar panel? To get a charge out of life!" This research invites further exploration into the unanticipated associations that lurk within the labyrinth of economic variables and consumer preferences. So, let's buckle up and harness the power of the sun—it's time to drive towards a bright, sun-powered future.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

When pondering the concepts of household spending on used cars and solar power generated in Grenada, one may initially find themselves lost in a maze of disparate variables. However, as Dad always said, "When it comes to research, you've got to keep your output sunny and your assumptions shady." With this sage advice in mind, our investigation aimed to shed light on the surprising relationship between these seemingly unconnected phenomena.

As we embarked on this inquiry, we were reminded of the classic question: "What do you call a car that's solar-powered? A sunroof!" However, beyond the realm of whimsical wordplay, our research is rooted in rigorous statistical analysis. Leveraging comprehensive data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Energy Information Administration, we delved into the web of correlations and unearthed unexpected findings.

The correlation coefficient of 0.9671687 and a p-value of less than 0.01 that emerged from our study has left us contemplating the age-old riddle: "What do you get when you cross a solar panel with a used car? Plenty of energy for a sunny road trip!" It is evident that the connection between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada is more than just a mere happenstance—it is a robust and fascinating bond, ripe for exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on used cars and Solar power generated in Grenada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Exhaust to Electrifying: The Shining Connection between Used Cars and Solar Power

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to understanding household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada, one might initially think they have as much in common as a wrench and a sunbeam. However, our research sought to shine a light on the surprising relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Using comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Energy Information Administration, we delved into this puzzling connection and uncovered striking findings.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.9671687 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our study revealed a remarkably strong positive relationship between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in the picturesque Caribbean nation of Grenada. This unexpected link may leave one pondering, "Are households stocking up on used cars to gather more solar power or are they using solar power to charge their new electric cars?"

It's not just arbitrary numbers and calculations—the striking connection between used car spending and solar power may truly ignite curiosity in both the transportation and renewable energy sectors. No longer can we dismiss this relationship as mere coincidence; it seems there's an electrifying bond at play here. This study advances our understanding of consumer behavior and renewable energy adoption, shedding light on the unexpected intersections in the modern world.

As the old saying goes, "Why did the used car buy a solar panel? To get a charge out of life!" This research invites further exploration into the unanticipated associations that lurk within the labyrinth of economic variables and consumer preferences. So, let's buckle up and harness the power of the sun—it's time to drive towards a bright, sun-powered future.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
When pondering the concepts of household spending on used cars and solar power generated in Grenada, one may initially find themselves lost in a maze of disparate variables. However, as Dad always said, "When it comes to research, you've got to keep your output sunny and your assumptions shady." With this sage advice in mind, our investigation aimed to shed light on the surprising relationship between these seemingly unconnected phenomena.
As we embarked on this inquiry, we were reminded of the classic question: "What do you call a car that's solar-powered? A sunroof!" However, beyond the realm of whimsical wordplay, our research is rooted in rigorous statistical analysis. Leveraging comprehensive data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Energy Information Administration, we delved into the web of correlations and unearthed unexpected findings.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9671687 and a p-value of less than 0.01 that emerged from our study has left us contemplating the age-old riddle: "What do you get when you cross a solar panel with a used car? Plenty of energy for a sunny road trip!" It is evident that the connection between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada is more than just a mere happenstance—it is a robust and fascinating bond, ripe for exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Prior research has provided valuable insights into the individual realms of household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada. Smith et al. (2018) highlighted the influence of economic factors and consumer preferences on used car purchases, while Doe and Jones (2020) delved into the complexities of solar energy adoption in small island nations. These studies established a solid foundation for understanding the separate domains, akin to setting the stage for a classic joke setup – but little did they know, the punchline was yet to come.

Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Energy Economy: A Solar Odyssey" by Greenman (2017) and "Driven: A Journey into the World of Used Cars" by Miles (2019) have each contributed vital knowledge to the respective fields. Moreover, fictional works such as "The Sun-Kissed Drive" by Solaris (2015) and "The Electric Car Chronicles" by Volt (2020) have intriguingly nuanced titles that could almost pass off as relevant to our purported theme.

In our pursuit of understanding the interconnectedness between used cars and solar power, one cannot underestimate the value of popular culture references. From binging on "Pimp My Ride" to baking under the blazing sun while watching "Survivor: Grenada," the team drew inspiration from a diverse range of entertainment sources. While these TV shows may not be directly related to our topic, a lighthearted approach can sometimes enlighten the mind like a solar-powered lightbulb.

As the exploration of the literature culminates, it becomes evident that the intersection of annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada presents an enigmatic enigma. This unexpected connection, much like a surprising punchline, deserves further investigation and a cheerful acceptance of the whimsy that permeates the world of empirical research. And as Dad always said, "Why was the solar panel such a good student? Because it was outstanding in its field!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on used cars and Solar power generated in Grenada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2007 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Exhaust to Electrifying: The Shining Connection between Used Cars and Solar Power

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to understanding household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada, one might initially think they have as much in common as a wrench and a sunbeam. However, our research sought to shine a light on the surprising relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Using comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Energy Information Administration, we delved into this puzzling connection and uncovered striking findings.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.9671687 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our study revealed a remarkably strong positive relationship between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in the picturesque Caribbean nation of Grenada. This unexpected link may leave one pondering, "Are households stocking up on used cars to gather more solar power or are they using solar power to charge their new electric cars?"

It's not just arbitrary numbers and calculations—the striking connection between used car spending and solar power may truly ignite curiosity in both the transportation and renewable energy sectors. No longer can we dismiss this relationship as mere coincidence; it seems there's an electrifying bond at play here. This study advances our understanding of consumer behavior and renewable energy adoption, shedding light on the unexpected intersections in the modern world.

As the old saying goes, "Why did the used car buy a solar panel? To get a charge out of life!" This research invites further exploration into the unanticipated associations that lurk within the labyrinth of economic variables and consumer preferences. So, let's buckle up and harness the power of the sun—it's time to drive towards a bright, sun-powered future.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
When pondering the concepts of household spending on used cars and solar power generated in Grenada, one may initially find themselves lost in a maze of disparate variables. However, as Dad always said, "When it comes to research, you've got to keep your output sunny and your assumptions shady." With this sage advice in mind, our investigation aimed to shed light on the surprising relationship between these seemingly unconnected phenomena.
As we embarked on this inquiry, we were reminded of the classic question: "What do you call a car that's solar-powered? A sunroof!" However, beyond the realm of whimsical wordplay, our research is rooted in rigorous statistical analysis. Leveraging comprehensive data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Energy Information Administration, we delved into the web of correlations and unearthed unexpected findings.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9671687 and a p-value of less than 0.01 that emerged from our study has left us contemplating the age-old riddle: "What do you get when you cross a solar panel with a used car? Plenty of energy for a sunny road trip!" It is evident that the connection between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada is more than just a mere happenstance—it is a robust and fascinating bond, ripe for exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enthralling saga of the unexpected relationship between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada, we employed a methodological mosaic as intricate as a solar panel's circuitry. Our data collection and analysis journey began with a thorough excavation of information from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Energy Information Administration, akin to a treasure hunt for economic insights.

Once armed with a treasure trove of data spanning from 2007 to 2021, we set sail on a statistical odyssey, navigating the choppy seas of regression analysis and correlation studies. Like intrepid explorers charting uncharted territories, we braved the wilds of statistical software programs, embracing the intricate dance of coefficients and p-values with the determination of a car enthusiast seeking to restore a vintage automobile.

In the spirit of scientific innovation, we ingeniously concocted a conceptual framework akin to crafting a solar-powered vehicle with spare car parts and a dash of ingenuity. Drawing upon established theories of consumer behavior and energy consumption patterns, we crafted a theoretical tapestry that wove together the seemingly disparate threads of used car spending and solar power generation.

To ensure the robustness of our findings, we subjected our data to a battery of sensitivity analyses, akin to stress-testing a solar panel under the scorching Caribbean sun. This involved scrutinizing the data from multiple vantage points and conducting rigorous checks for outliers and anomalous patterns, much like a mechanic meticulously inspecting a car for signs of wear and tear.

In a lighthearted nod to the whimsical nature of our research subject, we also infused a "spark of creativity" into our methodology, incorporating puns and quips at every turn. As the saying goes, "Why don't solar panels go to school? Because they already have a lot of energy!"

Our journey of discovery culminated in the unearthing of an electrifying relationship between used car spending and solar power generation, illuminating the nexus of consumer choices and sustainable energy adoption. The methodology employed in this study stands as a testament to the adage that, much like a well-maintained car, rigorous research requires meticulous attention to detail and an occasional touch of humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on used cars and Solar power generated in Grenada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2007 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9671687, r-squared of 0.9354154, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Exhaust to Electrifying: The Shining Connection between Used Cars and Solar Power

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to understanding household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada, one might initially think they have as much in common as a wrench and a sunbeam. However, our research sought to shine a light on the surprising relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Using comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Energy Information Administration, we delved into this puzzling connection and uncovered striking findings.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.9671687 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our study revealed a remarkably strong positive relationship between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in the picturesque Caribbean nation of Grenada. This unexpected link may leave one pondering, "Are households stocking up on used cars to gather more solar power or are they using solar power to charge their new electric cars?"

It's not just arbitrary numbers and calculations—the striking connection between used car spending and solar power may truly ignite curiosity in both the transportation and renewable energy sectors. No longer can we dismiss this relationship as mere coincidence; it seems there's an electrifying bond at play here. This study advances our understanding of consumer behavior and renewable energy adoption, shedding light on the unexpected intersections in the modern world.

As the old saying goes, "Why did the used car buy a solar panel? To get a charge out of life!" This research invites further exploration into the unanticipated associations that lurk within the labyrinth of economic variables and consumer preferences. So, let's buckle up and harness the power of the sun—it's time to drive towards a bright, sun-powered future.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
When pondering the concepts of household spending on used cars and solar power generated in Grenada, one may initially find themselves lost in a maze of disparate variables. However, as Dad always said, "When it comes to research, you've got to keep your output sunny and your assumptions shady." With this sage advice in mind, our investigation aimed to shed light on the surprising relationship between these seemingly unconnected phenomena.
As we embarked on this inquiry, we were reminded of the classic question: "What do you call a car that's solar-powered? A sunroof!" However, beyond the realm of whimsical wordplay, our research is rooted in rigorous statistical analysis. Leveraging comprehensive data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Energy Information Administration, we delved into the web of correlations and unearthed unexpected findings.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9671687 and a p-value of less than 0.01 that emerged from our study has left us contemplating the age-old riddle: "What do you get when you cross a solar panel with a used car? Plenty of energy for a sunny road trip!" It is evident that the connection between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada is more than just a mere happenstance—it is a robust and fascinating bond, ripe for exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a strikingly strong positive correlation between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9671687. This relationship is so strong, it could power a car just with its energy! (Pun intended).

The R-squared value of 0.9354154 further underscores the robustness of this correlation, indicating that a significant proportion of the variation in solar power generated in Grenada can be explained by the variation in annual US household spending on used cars. It's almost as if solar power is fueled by the tire tracks of used cars!

Additionally, with a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings are statistically significant, reinforcing the validity of the observed correlation. This relationship is about as clear as daylight—the statistical evidence speaks for itself.

A visual representation of this compelling correlation is presented in Figure 1, a scatterplot depicting the strong association between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada. It's not just any old scatterplot; it's a shining example of the unexpected connections we can uncover through rigorous analysis. (The puns are simply inexhaustible!)

The strength of this correlation invites us to ponder the intriguing dynamics at play between consumer behavior and renewable energy adoption. It's time to rev up our understanding of these unexpected connections and harness the power of the sun for a brighter, more sustainable future.

The results of our study not only illuminate the surprising link between these two seemingly unrelated variables, but also spark further curiosity that drives us towards unlocking the untold mysteries of economic relationships. It's both an illuminating and electrifying discovery!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on used cars and Solar power generated in Grenada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
From Exhaust to Electrifying: The Shining Connection between Used Cars and Solar Power

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to understanding household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada, one might initially think they have as much in common as a wrench and a sunbeam. However, our research sought to shine a light on the surprising relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Using comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Energy Information Administration, we delved into this puzzling connection and uncovered striking findings.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.9671687 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our study revealed a remarkably strong positive relationship between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in the picturesque Caribbean nation of Grenada. This unexpected link may leave one pondering, "Are households stocking up on used cars to gather more solar power or are they using solar power to charge their new electric cars?"

It's not just arbitrary numbers and calculations—the striking connection between used car spending and solar power may truly ignite curiosity in both the transportation and renewable energy sectors. No longer can we dismiss this relationship as mere coincidence; it seems there's an electrifying bond at play here. This study advances our understanding of consumer behavior and renewable energy adoption, shedding light on the unexpected intersections in the modern world.

As the old saying goes, "Why did the used car buy a solar panel? To get a charge out of life!" This research invites further exploration into the unanticipated associations that lurk within the labyrinth of economic variables and consumer preferences. So, let's buckle up and harness the power of the sun—it's time to drive towards a bright, sun-powered future.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Prior research has provided valuable insights into the individual realms of household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada. Smith et al. (2018) highlighted the influence of economic factors and consumer preferences on used car purchases, while Doe and Jones (2020) delved into the complexities of solar energy adoption in small island nations. These studies established a solid foundation for understanding the separate domains, akin to setting the stage for a classic joke setup – but little did they know, the punchline was yet to come.
Turning to non-fiction literature, "The Energy Economy: A Solar Odyssey" by Greenman (2017) and "Driven: A Journey into the World of Used Cars" by Miles (2019) have each contributed vital knowledge to the respective fields. Moreover, fictional works such as "The Sun-Kissed Drive" by Solaris (2015) and "The Electric Car Chronicles" by Volt (2020) have intriguingly nuanced titles that could almost pass off as relevant to our purported theme.
In our pursuit of understanding the interconnectedness between used cars and solar power, one cannot underestimate the value of popular culture references. From binging on "Pimp My Ride" to baking under the blazing sun while watching "Survivor: Grenada," the team drew inspiration from a diverse range of entertainment sources. While these TV shows may not be directly related to our topic, a lighthearted approach can sometimes enlighten the mind like a solar-powered lightbulb.
As the exploration of the literature culminates, it becomes evident that the intersection of annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada presents an enigmatic enigma. This unexpected connection, much like a surprising punchline, deserves further investigation and a cheerful acceptance of the whimsy that permeates the world of empirical research. And as Dad always said, "Why was the solar panel such a good student? Because it was outstanding in its field!"

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a strikingly strong positive correlation between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9671687. This relationship is so strong, it could power a car just with its energy! (Pun intended).
The R-squared value of 0.9354154 further underscores the robustness of this correlation, indicating that a significant proportion of the variation in solar power generated in Grenada can be explained by the variation in annual US household spending on used cars. It's almost as if solar power is fueled by the tire tracks of used cars!
Additionally, with a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings are statistically significant, reinforcing the validity of the observed correlation. This relationship is about as clear as daylight—the statistical evidence speaks for itself.
A visual representation of this compelling correlation is presented in Figure 1, a scatterplot depicting the strong association between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada. It's not just any old scatterplot; it's a shining example of the unexpected connections we can uncover through rigorous analysis. (The puns are simply inexhaustible!)
The strength of this correlation invites us to ponder the intriguing dynamics at play between consumer behavior and renewable energy adoption. It's time to rev up our understanding of these unexpected connections and harness the power of the sun for a brighter, more sustainable future.
The results of our study not only illuminate the surprising link between these two seemingly unrelated variables, but also spark further curiosity that drives us towards unlocking the untold mysteries of economic relationships. It's both an illuminating and electrifying discovery!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has shed light on the unexpected yet remarkably strong relationship between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada. The findings not only corroborate earlier research but also provide a spark for further investigation into the intriguing dynamics of consumer behavior and renewable energy adoption. It seems that understanding the intersection of these disparate variables is like shifting gears in a solar-powered car – it requires some adjustments.

One might recall the fictional work "The Sun-Kissed Drive" by Solaris (2015), which, in an unexpected twist, may not be entirely unrelated to our research findings. The quirky title almost suggests a prescient awareness of the surprising connection we have unearthed. It appears that reality has outpaced fiction and given rise to a narrative worthy of a punchline, much like a good dad joke resonating with timeless wisdom.

The strong positive correlation we observed aligns with the expectations set by prior literature—although perhaps not those of fictional works unlikely to predict empirical data accurately. The robust statistical evidence supports the notion that this relationship is no laughing matter; it's as real as a well-maintained used car cruising under the tropical sun. This synergy between seemingly unrelated economic parameters beckons us to delve deeper into the labyrinth of consumer preferences and energy dynamics, much like a dynamic duo cruising through uncharted territory.

Turning our attention to popular culture references, the influence of TV shows like "Pimp My Ride" and "Survivor: Grenada" may not have been directly cited in academic literature, but their influence lingered in the background. They were a reminder that a lighthearted approach to research, much like a good dad joke, can enhance the curiosity and creativity of the scientific process. Indeed, the unexpected connections we uncover are akin to punchlines waiting to be delivered.

The findings of our study carry implications not only for the fields of economics and renewable energy but also for the larger tapestry of consumer behavior and environmental sustainability. It seems that a sun-powered future is not just an idealistic notion but rather a tangible outcome of the intricate interplay between seemingly disparate economic variables. Much like a good dad joke, this unexpected relationship invites further exploration, and maybe a few chuckles along the way as we navigate the twists and turns of empirical investigation.

In summary, it's time to embrace the unexpected connections and peculiar correlations that arise in the realm of empirical research. Our study has not only validated prior insights but also illuminated pathways toward a brighter, more sustainable future. As dad always said, "Why did the used car buy a solar panel? To get a charge out of life!" Indeed, it seems that this relationship has charged our enthusiasm for understanding the unanticipated intersections of household spending on used cars and solar power generation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on used cars and Solar power generated in Grenada. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
From Exhaust to Electrifying: The Shining Connection between Used Cars and Solar Power

[[ABSTRACT]]
When it comes to understanding household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada, one might initially think they have as much in common as a wrench and a sunbeam. However, our research sought to shine a light on the surprising relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Using comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Energy Information Administration, we delved into this puzzling connection and uncovered striking findings.

With a correlation coefficient of 0.9671687 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our study revealed a remarkably strong positive relationship between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in the picturesque Caribbean nation of Grenada. This unexpected link may leave one pondering, "Are households stocking up on used cars to gather more solar power or are they using solar power to charge their new electric cars?"

It's not just arbitrary numbers and calculations—the striking connection between used car spending and solar power may truly ignite curiosity in both the transportation and renewable energy sectors. No longer can we dismiss this relationship as mere coincidence; it seems there's an electrifying bond at play here. This study advances our understanding of consumer behavior and renewable energy adoption, shedding light on the unexpected intersections in the modern world.

As the old saying goes, "Why did the used car buy a solar panel? To get a charge out of life!" This research invites further exploration into the unanticipated associations that lurk within the labyrinth of economic variables and consumer preferences. So, let's buckle up and harness the power of the sun—it's time to drive towards a bright, sun-powered future.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
When pondering the concepts of household spending on used cars and solar power generated in Grenada, one may initially find themselves lost in a maze of disparate variables. However, as Dad always said, "When it comes to research, you've got to keep your output sunny and your assumptions shady." With this sage advice in mind, our investigation aimed to shed light on the surprising relationship between these seemingly unconnected phenomena.
As we embarked on this inquiry, we were reminded of the classic question: "What do you call a car that's solar-powered? A sunroof!" However, beyond the realm of whimsical wordplay, our research is rooted in rigorous statistical analysis. Leveraging comprehensive data obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Energy Information Administration, we delved into the web of correlations and unearthed unexpected findings.
The correlation coefficient of 0.9671687 and a p-value of less than 0.01 that emerged from our study has left us contemplating the age-old riddle: "What do you get when you cross a solar panel with a used car? Plenty of energy for a sunny road trip!" It is evident that the connection between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada is more than just a mere happenstance—it is a robust and fascinating bond, ripe for exploration.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a strikingly strong positive correlation between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9671687. This relationship is so strong, it could power a car just with its energy! (Pun intended).
The R-squared value of 0.9354154 further underscores the robustness of this correlation, indicating that a significant proportion of the variation in solar power generated in Grenada can be explained by the variation in annual US household spending on used cars. It's almost as if solar power is fueled by the tire tracks of used cars!
Additionally, with a p-value of less than 0.01, our findings are statistically significant, reinforcing the validity of the observed correlation. This relationship is about as clear as daylight—the statistical evidence speaks for itself.
A visual representation of this compelling correlation is presented in Figure 1, a scatterplot depicting the strong association between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada. It's not just any old scatterplot; it's a shining example of the unexpected connections we can uncover through rigorous analysis. (The puns are simply inexhaustible!)
The strength of this correlation invites us to ponder the intriguing dynamics at play between consumer behavior and renewable energy adoption. It's time to rev up our understanding of these unexpected connections and harness the power of the sun for a brighter, more sustainable future.
The results of our study not only illuminate the surprising link between these two seemingly unrelated variables, but also spark further curiosity that drives us towards unlocking the untold mysteries of economic relationships. It's both an illuminating and electrifying discovery!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a remarkably strong positive relationship between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada. This unexpected bond between gas guzzlers and sun-soakers may leave one pondering, "Are households stocking up on used cars to gather more solar power or are they using solar power to charge their new electric cars?" It seems the answer lies in the sun's rays illuminating the path to sustainable energy and transportation choices.

The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9671687 and a p-value of less than 0.01 shine a light on the robustness of this unexpected relationship. This calls to mind the timeless question, "Why don't solar panels ever get into arguments? Because they work with the power of the sun, not hot air!"

The strength of this correlation encourages us to consider the intriguing dynamics at play between consumer behavior and renewable energy adoption. It's time we gear up to drive towards a bright, sun-powered future, and leave fossil fuel-powered puns in the dust.

Therefore, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. Like a solar-powered car with a full battery, this connection has been thoroughly charged with insight and humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Exhaust to Electrifying: The Shining Connection between Used Cars and Solar Power. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Eco-Vehicle Innovations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Exhaust to Electrifying: The Shining Connection between Used Cars and Solar Power. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Alternative Energy and Eclectic Car Research (SAEECR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Exhaust to Electrifying: The Shining Connection between Used Cars and Solar Power with an abstract of When it comes to understanding household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in Grenada, one might initially think they have as much in common as a wrench and a sunbeam. However, our research sought to shine a light on the surprising relationship between these two seemingly unrelated variables. Using comprehensive data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Energy Information Administration, we delved into this puzzling connection and uncovered striking findings.
With a correlation coefficient of 0.9671687 and a p-value of less than 0.01, our study revealed a remarkably strong positive relationship between annual US household spending on used cars and the solar power generated in the picturesque Caribbean nation of Grenada. This unexpected link may leave one pondering, "Are households stocking up on used cars to gather more solar power or are they using solar power to charge their new electric cars?"
It's not just arbitrary numbers and calculations—the striking connection between used car spending and solar power may truly ignite curiosity in both the transportation and renewable energy sectors. No longer can we dismiss this relationship as mere coincidence; it seems there's an electrifying bond at play here. This study advances our understanding of consumer behavior and renewable energy adoption, shedding light on the unexpected intersections in the modern world.
As the old saying goes, "Why did the used car buy a solar panel? To get a charge out of life!" This research invites further exploration into the unanticipated associations that lurk within the labyrinth of economic variables and consumer preferences. So, let's buckle up and harness the power of the sun—it's time to drive towards a bright, sun-powered future.

ChatGPT:

used cars, solar power, household spending, renewable energy adoption, consumer behavior, correlation coefficient, p-value, transportation sector, electric cars, solar panel, consumer preferences, economic variables, energy information administration, bureau of labor statistics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Annual US household spending on used cars
Detailed data title: Average annual household spend on used cars
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on used cars

Solar power generated in Grenada
Detailed data title: Total solar power generated in Grenada in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Solar power generated in Grenada

Correlation r = 0.9671687 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9354154 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Solar power generated in Grenada) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on used cars) over the 15 years from 2007 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.1E-9. 0.0000000041208097297691225000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 4.1E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 242,670,753 random variables You don't actually need 242 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.9, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Annual US household spending on used cars (Household spend)156713151304131813391516166916891982191921012084237523602555
Solar power generated in Grenada (Billion kWh)0.00010.00010.00010.00010.00010.0009410.0009410.0009410.0013380.0023130.0030850.0032950.0040.0040.00488




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
  5. Outlandish outliers: There are "outliers" in this data. In concept, "outlier" just means "way different than the rest of your dataset." When calculating a correlation like this, they are particularly impactful because a single outlier can substantially increase your correlation.

    For the purposes of this project, I counted a point as an outlier if it the residual was two standard deviations from the mean.

    (This bullet point only shows up in the details page on charts that do, in fact, have outliers.)
    They stand out on the scatterplot above: notice the dots that are far away from any other dots. I intentionally mishandeled outliers, which makes the correlation look extra strong.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1567,1315,1304,1318,1339,1516,1669,1689,1982,1919,2101,2084,2375,2360,2555,])
array_2 = np.array([0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.0001,0.000941,0.000941,0.000941,0.001338,0.002313,0.003085,0.003295,0.004,0.004,0.00488,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on used cars"
array_2_name = "Solar power generated in Grenada"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!


Correlation ID: 5900 · Black Variable ID: 19928 · Red Variable ID: 23702
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0